COMMON LAW

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION

COMPLAINANT:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

RESPONDENT:
Blah Blah Blah
(in the right of Her purported Royal Highness
“Queen Elizabeth II of Australia”
Buckingham Palace
London ENGLAND SW1A 1AA)

In respect of Parole Conditions imposed by the Queensland Parole Board the

Complainant states the following:

TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to the following facts the Complainant is not
subject to any law, Act, Regulation, Rule or other instrument issued, decreed, given Royal
Assent to or any way otherwise enlivened, enacted and or introduced, in respect of
Australia which has, or had, its or their basis of legality and or power and or authority
seated in a Foreign Parliament and or Power.

The Complainant, in the absence of any legitimate enforceable laws, other than the laws
of the Sovereign Origine Peoples of Gondwanna Land, being proven to be in effect in
Australia at law, relies upon His Traditional and Customary Nunukul law, International
law and non-fiction fact as the grounds of this Notice.

Due to the significant International disputation over the legality of the use of the Act (63  &  
64     VICTORIA,   CHAPTER   12)   An   Act   to   constitute   the   Commonwealth   of  
Australia.(9th July 1900)UK (Long Title) within Australia in respect of and against
the freedoms and rights and privileges of the Sovereign Independent Origine Peoples of
Gondwanna Land (Australia), the Complainant places no faith in the integrity of, and refuses
the recognise the legality of the purported government of the State of Queensland nor the
“Judicial” system until they can provide the evidence sought by the Complainant in respect of
their legality to force the Complainant to comply with the domestic law of the Parliament of
the United Kingdom, which, since at least the 10th of January 1920, has been an illegal
practice under International Law within Australia.

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 1

JULY 2008
FACTS:
1: The Complainant is not required at law to comply with:
1.1: any Notice of any offence alleged by the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND
nor any of its agents, officers assigns or representatives, including the
Queensland Parole Board”
1.1.1: prior to the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” providing to the
Complainant documented proof as to its legal basis, and,

1.1.2: allowing the Complainant sufficient time to have such

documented proof of such alleged legal basis assessed and
verified in writing by:
1.1.2.1: the authorities documented as to have given said
authority to the STATE OF QUEENSLAND.

1.1.2.2: (In respect of any suggested and or purported

authority, which is suggested and or purported to
have been granted by any acknowledged foreign
power including but not limited to the United
Kingdom, its’ parliament and monarch) having that
suggested and or purported authority validated by
the United Nations, and the Foreign Power
concerned in respect of that authority or powers’
supposed and or purported lawful application
against the Complainant as an Indigenous Sovereign
Australian Citizen.

2: The Complainant is not required at law to comply with an opinion of any “Court”
unless it is an opinion of that Court, AT LAW, with that opinion complying with
the obligations of the Court, the State and the Commonwealth under International
Law pursuant to any and all UN Human Rights and or other treaties and
Covenants and Protocols to which the Commonwealth of Australia is a State
Party.

3: The Complainant is not required at law to comply with any assertion that any
purported “Court” is a “court” unless that “court” can, prior to the
commencement or continuance of any hearing in respect of any matter
concerning the Complainant in that purported “court”, provides to the
Complainant evidence of:
3.1: the “courts” Source of power.

3.2: the “courts” Head of power

3.3: the “courts” authority

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 2

JULY 2008
 3.4: the “courts” Jurisdiction.

3.4: the validity of any State or Federal “Constitution” or other document

relied upon by the “court” to evidence the points listed in 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and
3.3 above.

4: The Complainant can not be forced to defend any Notice of any offence alleged
by the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND”
4.1: prior to the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” providing to the
Complainant documented proof as to its legal basis, and,

4.2: allowing the Complainant sufficient time to have such documented proof
of such alleged legal basis assessed and verified by:
4.2.1: the authorities documented as to have given said
authority to the STATE OF QUEENSLAND.
And, or,
4.2.2: (In respect of any suggested and or purported authority or
power, which is suggested and or purported to have been
issued by any foreign power, whether a government,
parliament and or a monarch, in respect of any allegation
made against the Complainant:) having that suggested and or
purported authority validated by the United Nations or other
RELEVANT competent entity), in respect of the supposed
and or purported lawful application against the Complainant
as an Origine Sovereign Australian Citizen of that
purported authority or power, including:
4.2.2.1: The Government of the United Kingdom,

4.2.2.2: “The Queen of Australia” – being -Queen

Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom at
Buckingham Palace, London SW1A 1AA.

4.2.2.3: The United Nations.

4.2.2.4: The European Union Government (which

owns ALL British legislation “Whenever it
was created”).

4.2.2.5: All governments of the Commonwealth and

States and Territories of the Commonwealth of
Australia.

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 3

JULY 2008
5: If any purported “Court” of any State or Territory of the Commonwealth of
Australia or the Commonwealth of Australia believes the Act to Constitute the
Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK is legitimately binding upon the
Complainant, The Complainant reserves the right to demand this matter to be
referred to the High Court pursuant to Section 75(i) of the “Constitution”, as the
Complainant contests the Queensland Parole Boards’ claim to lawful or legal
Jurisdiction over the Complainant on the basis of the obligations of the
Commonwealth and States to the Complainant pursuant to various Treaties to
which Australia is a Party.

6: No purported or actual “court” within the Commonwealth of Australia” has a

legal capacity to hear any matter and or execute any judgment against the
Complainant in respect of any matter brought before any “Court” if that “court”
can not or does not provide to the Complainant lawful and examinable evidence
of its’ :
6.1: Legal basis, and,

6.2: Head of Authority, and,

6.3: Head of Power.

7: The evidence required to prove the Legal Basis, Head of Authority and Head of
Power of any “court” in Australia which is proposing to hear any matter
concerning the Complainant must:
7.1: be compliant to Australias’ obligations under the Charter of the United
Nations, and,

7.2: be compliant with Australias’ obligations pursuant to International Treaties

to which Australia is a Party, and,

7.3: be compliant with International Law, and,

7.4: be provided in document form to the satisfaction of the Complainant.

8: Neither the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” nor its agents, assigns, officers nor
representatives have the authority to:
8.1: exercise any authority under any Act or Law against or in respect of the
Complainant which is subordinate to the Act “An Act to Constitute the
Commonwealth of Australia 1900 (UK)” as:
8.1.1: this Act is an Act of the Parliament of Great Brittain and Northern
Ireland which has its’ seat of power at Westminster, London,
England, and,

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 4

JULY 2008
 8.1.2: The Act “An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia
Act 1900 (UK)” is ultra vires to commonwealth and states and
territories of Australia.

8.1.3: No officer or agent of the Commonwealth of Australia or any State

and or Territory of the Commonwealth of Australia can exercise
any authority derived from the British Act “An Act to Constitute
the Commonwealth of Australia” (a Law owned by a power
foreign to the Commonwealth of Australia) over a Sovereign,
Independent, Origine man, woman or child.

9: No officer, agent, assignee, representative nor employee of the “STATE OF

QUEENSLAND” has the authority to:
9.1: exercise any authority under any Act or Law which is subaltern to the Act
“An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 (UK)” as:
9.1.1: this Act is an Act of the Parliament of Great Brittain and Northern
Ireland which has its’ seat of power at Westminster, London,
England, and,

9.1.2: The Act “An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act
1900 (UK)” is ultra vires to commonwealth of Australia.

10: Any officer or agent of the Commonwealth of Australia, or of any State and or
Territory of the Commonwealth of Australia, who exercises any authority derived
from the British Act “An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia” or
any other Act of any other foreign power over any Independent Origine and or
non-Origine Individual Sovereign man, woman or child is in breach of the rights
(both Civil, Political, Human and Social) - as bound in the various International
Treaties to which Australia is a State Party - of that Independent Origine or non-
Origine Individual Sovereign man, woman or child.

11: At no point in time did the Complainant consent to the ALLEGED AND AS
YET UNSUBSTANTIATED presumption that the Complainant is or ever
was subject to the jurisdiction of the British or quasi-British-Australian
parliaments or their agents, assigns, representatives or officers.

12: ALL “Courts” at ALL levels including the ILLEGITIMATE and ILLEGAL
“Courts” of Australia are obliged to protect my rights:
12.1: in accordance with Divine Law, and,

12.2: in accordance with Natural Law, and,

12.3: in accordance with the Common Law, and,

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 5

JULY 2008
 12.4: in accordance with Statute Law: in that order.

13: The United Nations International Covenant on Economic, Social and

Cultural Rights, Part 1, Article 1, Section 1 states:
13.1: “All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right
they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their
economic, social and cultural development.”

14: The United Nations Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights, Article 1, states:
14.1: “A State Party to the Covenant that becomes a Party to the present
Protocol recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and
consider communications from individuals subject to its jurisdiction who
claim to be victims of a violation by that State Party of any of the rights
set forth in the Covenant. No communication shall be received by the
Committee if it concerns a State Party to the Covenant, which is not a
Party to the present Protocol.”

15: The Charter of the United Nations, Article 2, Sections 1, 2, and 4 state:
15.1: (Section 1) The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign
equality of all its Members.

15.2: (Section 2) All Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and
benefits resulting from membership, shall fulfill in good faith the
obligations assumed by them in accordance with the present Charter.

15.3: (Section 4) All Members shall refrain in their international relations

from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political
independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the
Purposes of the United Nations.

16: For any “Court” which is convened pursuant to any “law” given “Royal Assent”
under the provisions of the British Act entitled “An Act to Constitute the
Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK) to hear any matter against the
Complainant, as an Independent, Individual, Indigenous, Sovereign, Australian
Citizen is to breach Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations and to commit
and Act of War against the Complainant.

17: The Geneva Convention, Chapter 1, Article 2, states:

17.1: Chapter 1, Article 2:
“In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in peacetime,
the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any
other armed conflict which may arise between two or more of the High
Contracting Parties, even if the state of war is not recognized by one of
them.”

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 6

JULY 2008
 “The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total
occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party, even if the said
occupation meets with no armed resistance.”

“Although one of the Powers in conflict may not be a party to the

present Convention, the Powers who are parties thereto shall remain
bound by it in their mutual relations. They shall furthermore be bound
by the Convention in relation to the said Power, if the latter accepts and
applies the provisions thereof.”

18: All the above items of International Law, or International Agreements, or

International Treaties have been signed by the Government of Australia.

19: Various past and the present Executive Governments of Australia, as the purported
servants of the people who constitute the Commonwealth of Australia, have
signed International Treaties and Covenants with the intent that committal to these
Treaties and Covenants (which the Complainant relies upon in respect of his
defense in these matters) give rise to a legitimate expectation that these Treaties
and Covenants have the purpose of protecting the Complainants rights pursuant to
these Treaties and Covenants.

20: These Covenants and Treaties have also been entered into Australian Law under
Acts bearing titles similar to the titles of the International Agreements. (E.g., The
Geneva Convention Act, The Charter of the United Nations Act, The Human
Rights Commission Act etc.)

21: Australia became a belligerent Independent Sovereign State on the 28th of June
1919 when the then Prime Minister of Australia (William Hughes) signed the
Treaty of Versailles.

22: This FACT was FURTHER evidenced in October 1919, when this fact was
recorded in the Hansard of the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.

23: This FACT was FURTHER ratified on the 10th of January 1920 when Mr
Hughes and the Australian Deputy Prime Minister (Sir Joseph Cook) signed the
League of Nations Covenant, making the Commonwealth of Australia a
foundation Member.

24: This FACT was FURTHER ratified in June 1945, when Australia became a
foundation member of the United Nations by signing the United Nations Charter.

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 7

JULY 2008
25: The actions as detailed in paragraphs 21, 22, 23 and 24 above, declared to the
World that the Commonwealth of Australia was an Independent, Sovereign Nation
Member State of the League of Nations, with EQUAL Nation Status as the United
Kingdom, and as such Australian People were, at the least from the 10th of January
1920, FREE FROM THE IMPOSITION OF ANY BRITISH LAW -
including “An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900
UK)”.

26: This was written into Australia law on September 14, 1945 via the Charter of the
United Nations Act 1945.

27: From October 1, 1919, or January 10, 1920, or at the very least, June 26, 1945, it
became an offence under International Law to enforce foreign law, including the
Domestic Law of the United Kingdom) upon the Australian people who are the
government of the country, not the parliaments.
28: To do so is to commit an act of treason against the Australian People.

NOTE: Apparently only the “Australian” Judiciary, Police and the obviously corrupt
political systems within Australia itself have problems in recognizing these facts

This refusal to accept these facts apparently stems from an illegitimate and or
private/personal intent by the Judiciary, Police and political systems to oblige
the United Kingdom Parliament and Monarch in their continued raping and
pillaging of the natural wealth and resources of the Sovereign Indigenous
Australian people.

29: The Full Bench of the High Court of Australia has ruled that the United Kingdom
is a power foreign to Australia. (See Sue v Hill, 1999.)

30: For the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, or the Government of

any State or Territory of the Commonwealth of Australia to permit, encourage and
or allow the practice by Australian “Courts” to exercise, enforce or other wise use
any law which stems from any British Act – regardless of when that Act was
enacted – is to COMMIT TREASON against the Sovereign Origine/Indigenous
Peoples of Australia.

31: The Full Bench of the High Court of Australia has ruled that International Treaties
are binding on all courts within Australia. (see Teoh)

32: The Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
consists of the House of Commons, the House of Lords, and the Queen (Queen
Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland).

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 8

JULY 2008
33: British Law, being the Act of Settlement 1701 UK, paragraph 7, stipulates that the
Queen of the United Kingdom is the Queen of the United Kingdom ONLY and
can not take her Sovereignty outside the dominions of England, Scotland or
Ireland without the consent of the Parliament, which was specifically denied,
statute barring the Monarchs from extending or construing to extend their
sovereignty into the Australasian colonies and Pacific Islands.

34: This Act has never been repealed.

35: She CANNOT, under law, be the Queen of anywhere else in the world, other than
England, Scotland and or Ireland.

36: Under British Law if she is the Queen of anywhere else she is committing an act
of treason against the British people, and is assuming the role of an Absolute
Monarch by usurping the authority of the Parliament of the United Kingdom to
which the Monarch has been subjective since the time Charles I lost his head in
1649.

37: Following the Restoration, in 1689 William and Mary of Orange came to the
throne of England.

38: Before they were crowned, in January 1689, they signed the Declaration of Right
which removed from the Monarch, the power of absolute Monarchy and made the
monarch subjective to the UK parliament, or in other words the Monarch became
a “Monarch in Parliament” as opposed to a “Monarch in Counsel”.

39: In October 1690 the Bill of Rights was passed which, among other things, gave
Executive Power in the United Kingdom to the United Kingdom Parliament. (This
was the birth of the ‘Constitutional Monarchy’, where the Executive Power no
longer lay with the monarch.)

40: This has never been changed in British Law.

41: The Journal of Captain Arthur Phillip, leader of the first fleet, shows his
Commission and Instructions under the Act of Parliament Establishing the
Colony state, in respect of “Aboriginal” People, the following:
41.1: “to endeavour by every possible means to open an intercourse with the
natives, and to conciliate their affections, enjoining all Our subjects to
live in amity and kindness with them. And if any of Our subjects shall
wantonly destroy them, or give them any unnecessary interruption in the
exercise of their several occupations, it is Our will and pleasure that you
do cause such offenders to be brought to punishment.”

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 9

JULY 2008
42: The Journal of the Judge Advocate General of the first fleet, Captain Collins, in a
1796 entry shows the following admission of ownership of the land by the
Origine Peoples, and the fact the Origine People had their own system of land
ownership and title over their own private real estates prior to the arrival of the
first fleet:
42.1: Their spears and shields, their clubs and lines etc are their own property;
they are manufactured by themselves and are the whole of their personal
estate. But, strangely as it may appear, they have also their real estates.
Bennelong, before he went to England and since his return, often assured
me that the island Memel, called by us Goat Island, close by Sydney Cove,
was his own property; that it was his fathers’, and that he should give it to
Bygone, his particular friend and companion. To this little spot he
appeared much attached and we have often seen him and his wife
Barrangaroo feasting and enjoying themselves on it. He told us of other
people who possessed this kind of hereditary property, which they retained
undisturbed.”

43: In the Address to Select Committee Of The House Of Commons On The

Aborigines Wherever British Settlements Are Made” , of July 1834, it was
recorded that:
43.1: the Kings’ “faithful Commons in Parliament assembled are deeply
impressed with the duty of acting upon the principals of justice and
humanity in the intercourse and relation of this country (the United
Kingdom) with the native inhabitants of its colonial settlements – of
affording them protection in the enjoyment of their civil rights, and of
imparting to them that degree of civilization, and that religion with which
Providence has blessed this nation; and it humbly prays, that his Majesty
will take such measures and give such directions to the Governors and
Officers of his Majestys’ settlements and plantations, as shall secure to the
natives the due observance, and the protection of their rights – promote
the spread of civilization amongst them, and lead them to the peaceful and
voluntary reception of the Christian religion.”

44: The then Chancellor of the Exchequor observed, and was recorded as stating that,
in respect of the statement in paragraph 43 above, British Settlements Are Made”,
and as stated:
44.1: “So far from being the expression of any new principal, only embodies
and recognizes principles on which the British Government has for a
considerable time been disposed to act”.

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 10

JULY 2008
45: The same Report of the Select Committee Of The House Of Commons On The
Aborigines Wherever British Settlements Are Made” also states:
45.1: It might be presumed that the native inhabitants of any land, have an
incontrovertible right to their own soil; it is a plain and sacred right
which seems not to have been understood. Europeans have entered their
borders uninvited, and when there, have not only acted as if they were the
undoubted lords of the soil, but have punished the natives as aggressors if
they have evinced a disposition to live in their own country.”

46: Justice Willis, of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, on 16 September 1841
in a Judgment of the court stated:
46.1: To elucidate so far as I am able the point for decision, I will first briefly
trace the history of this colony and of the settlement of this district, at the
same time remarking on the character which has been given of the
aborigines; and in the second place, state so much of the acknowledged
law of nations and the manner it has been acted upon with regard to
Aborigines, as it seems to me to bear on the subject, adding a few notices
of the manner in which uncivilized tribes have been treated with in other
British Colonies, and steps taken in Colonies where English law was in
force. I will premise that policy, or impolicy of an existing system can
avail nothing in the present instance. I can never permit the end to justify
any undue means for its accomplishment. This may be policy and wisdom
in a statesman, but it is little less than treason in a judge. He must not
wrest the law to his authority, or do a great right through a little wrong.”

47: In the same Report of the Select Committee Of The House Of Commons On The
Aborigines Wherever British Settlements Are Made”Mr Saxe Bannister, formerly
Attorney-General of the colony of New South Wales, is on the record as to have
stated to the committee on 31st August 1835, in respect of Origine law in the
Colony:
47.1: “We ought forthwith to begin, at least, to reduce the laws and usages of
the Aboriginal tribes to language, print them, and direct our courts of
justice to respect those laws in proper cases.”

48: During the Committees hearings, Mr Saxe Bannister handed a paper to Mr T.F.
Buxton, Chairman of the Committee, dated 19 August 1835, which, under the
heading of “Measures Affecting the Swan River and other New Australian
Colonies”, stated:
48.1: “Make treaties with the natives before proceeding further.”

49: The Complainant, in His Sovereign capacity, has offered to Treaty with the State
of Queensland, but this offer was refused by the State of Queensland, thus,

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 11

JULY 2008
 vitiating and negating any opportunity for the State of Queensland to extend, and
therefore exercise over the Complainant, any jurisdiction.

50: The same Report of the Select Committee Of The House Of Commons On The
Aborigines Wherever British Settlements Are Made” also states:
50.1: “…it is the recollection of many living men that every part of this territory
was the undisputed property of the aborigines.”

51: The same Report of the Select Committee Of The House Of Commons On The
Aborigines Wherever British Settlements Are Made” also states:
51.1: Much will depend on the manner in which this colony is considered to
have been acquired, and this brings me in the second place to advert to
the law of nations as acknowledged by the British Government, with
regard to Colonial possessions.

Colonies, says Mr Clark, in his summary of Colonial Law, and stated at

the Bar by Mr Barry , are acquired by conquest, by cession under treaty,
or by occupancy. By occupancy where an uninhabited country is
discovered by British subjects, and is upon such discovery, adopted or
recognized by the British Crown as part of its possessions. In case a
colony be acquired by occupancy, (he adds) the law of England then in
being, is immediately and ipso facto in force in the new settlement.

He further states, New South Wales and Van Diemens Land, were acquired
by discovery or simple occupation. New South Wales was not, however,
unoccupied, as we have seen, at the time it was taken possession of by the
colonists, for, “a body of the aborigines appeared on the shore, armed
with spears, which they through down as soon as they found the
strangers had no hostile intention.” This being the case, it does not
appear there was any conquest, and it is admitted there has hitherto been
cession under treaty.

52: The same Report of the Select Committee Of The House Of Commons On The
Aborigines Wherever British Settlements Are Made” also states:
52.1: This colony then stands on a different footing from some others for it was
neither an unoccupied place, nor was it obtained by right of conquest and
driving out the natives, nor by treaties. Indeed, as Mr Vattel very justly
says, “whoever agrees that robbery is a crime, and that we are not
allowed to take forcible possession of our nieghbours property, will
acknowledge without any further proof, that no nation has the right to
expel another people from the country they inhabit in order to settle it
herself.”

53: Further to the limitations imposed upon the “crown”/monarch of the UK

Parliament under the Act of Settlement 1701 UK, there are further, more clearly

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 12

JULY 2008
 defined limitations on the purported right of the “Crown”/monarch of that
parliament in respect of the purported legality of its’ extension or construed
extension of its’ sovereignty and or dominion into Gondwanna Land (Australia).

54: Section 6 of the Pacific Islander Protection Act 1872-75 clearly limits the
purported jurisdiction of the UK Parliament and its’ monarch to British Subjects
ONLY.

55: Section 7 of the Pacific Islander Protection Act 1872-75 states:

55.1: Nothing herein or in any such Order in Council shall extend or be
construed to extend to invest Her Majesty with any claim or title
whatsoever to dominion or sovereignty over any such islands (ie: the
Pacific Islands) or places as aforesaid (ie: the Australasian Colonies
including Australia and NZ), or to derogate from the rights of the tribes or
people inhabiting such islands or places, or of the Chiefs or rulers thereof,
to such sovereignty or dominion……….”
Clearly excluding the extension of the purported sovereignty of the parliament of
the United Kingdom into the Australasian “Colonies” and Pacific Islands.

56: The Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900, Chapter 1, Part 1,
Paragraph 1, STILL states:
56.1: “The legislative power of the Commonwealth shall be vested in a Federal
Parliament, which shall consist of the Queen, a Senate, and a House of
Representatives, and which is herein-after called “The Parliament” or
“The Parliament of the Commonwealth.”

57: It is clear and irrefutable that the “Queen” referred to in The Act to Constitute the
Commonwealth of Australia 1900, Chapter 1, Part 1, Paragraph 1, is the
“Queen” of the Parliament of the Untied Kingdom – not the purported and illegal
Queen of Australia.

58: The Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 [63 & 64 Vict.]
(Chapter 12) Paragraph 2, states:
58.1: “The provisions of this Act referring to the Queen shall extend to Her
Majesty’s heirs and successors in the Sovereignty of the United
Kingdom.”

59: The Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900, Chapter 1, Part 1,
Paragraph 2, states:
59.1: “A Governor-General appointed by the Queen shall be Her Majesty’s
representative in the Commonwealth, and shall have, and may exercise in
the Commonwealth during the Queen’s pleasure, but subject to this
Constitution, such powers and functions of the Queen as Her Majesty may
be pleased to assign to him.”

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 13

JULY 2008
60: The person or entity referred to in The Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of
Australia 1900, Chapter 1, Part 1, Paragraph 2, must be the “Queen” of the
Parliament of the Untied Kingdom which has been acknowledged as being a
Foreign Power – see Sue –v- Hill – High Court 1999.

61: Therefore, section 61 of Clause 9 of the Australian Constitution, which confers

Executive Power on the Queen of the United Kingdom through the various
Governors-General, in actual FACT confers executive power in Australia on the
Parliament of the United Kingdom as the Queen cannot, under UK law, bestow
any commissions of appointment (including Writs of Commission for
“Australian” Magistrates etc…) without the approval of the UK Parliament.

62: When it was realized that following Australian Independence in 1920, and
following the Balfour Declaration in 1927, the United Kingdom no longer had
any executive power over any other independent nation (eg: Australia), the UK
Parliament passed legislation separating the Queen and the UK Parliament from
the Governors-General of Australia.

63: The Governors-General, the Governors, and the Australian Parliament from then
on dealt with the British Foreign Office, not the British Colonial Office, as did
all other independent nations.

64: This was as a result of Australia being recognized by the Parliament and the
Monarch of the United Kingdom as being Independent of the Sovereign control
and or authority of the Parliament and or the Monarch of the British Parliament.

65: The Royal Styles and Titles Act 1973 removed the title ‘Queen of the United
Kingdom in Australia’ and substituted the title ‘Queen of Australia”.

66: Either title is a deception as they both suggest that “Queen Elizabeth II” of
London England, Monarch of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, can, does or
ever did hold any Executive, Royal, Legal, Constitutional and or any other right,
entitlement or authority over the Australian people.

67: Apart from the Royal Styles and Titles Act 1973 being illegal (as it confers a
“Royal Right” which no longer exists at law), The Act to Constitute the
Commonwealth of Australia recognizes ONLY the “Queen of the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland”.

68: The ‘Queen of Australia’ has no executive or other power within Australia as this
person is not recognized by the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia.

69: The Queen of the United Kingdom has no executive power within the UK, as she
was, is and always will be a Foreign Power in respect of the Commonwealth of
Australia.

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 14

JULY 2008
70: Executive power within the UK lies with the UK Parliament and not with the
Monarch.

71: Unless specifically agreed to, and or asked for, by the Australian people through
their elected representatives, via a federal referendum, no Executive power of
the Parliament and or the Monarch of the Untied Kingdom has any lawful control
over the Independent, Individual Sovereign, Australian people, but even more so
is the case in respect of the Independent, Individual, Indigenous Sovereign
Australian people, who have at NO TIME have willingly acquiesced to ANY
Colonial or other British “Law” and at no time have been party to any treaty
with the United Kingdom or “Australian” governments indicating such.

72: The Monarch of the Parliament of the United Kingdom in her purported capacity
as Queen of Australia or any other alleged or purported capacity cannot confer
any delegated executive powers to the Governors-General of Australia, or
Governors of the States, that she herself does not possess !!!, including:
72.1: Regal and or Vice-Regal authority for ANY person to act in the
purported official capacity of:
72.1.1: the Governor General of the Commonwealth of Australia,
and or;

72.1.2: the Governor of any of the States and or Territories of the

Commonwealth o Australia.

73: Halsburys Laws of England, Volume II, paragraphs 9 (11) to 9 (25) states, Quote:
“the Royal Sign Manual is a power of the United Kingdom Parliament under
such various acts as the Great Seal Act, the Crown Offices Act, the Clerk of the
Crown and Chancery Act, and the Crown Seal Offices Act etc.”

74: Therefore, NO appointments or commissions made by the “Queen of England”

(who is recognized in the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia Act
1900 UK), or the “Queen of Australia” (who is not recognized in the
Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK), that are not
signed by senior members of the UK Parliament are valid appointments as the
monarch has not had the power to make appointments of her own volition since
1690.

75: The last purportedly valid appointments made by a British Monarch were made
by Queen Victoria who died in 1901.

76: Under UK law, Royal appointments, authorities and commissions die with the
Monarch.

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 15

JULY 2008
77: There have never been any Royal Appointments, authorities or commissions
made in accordance with United Kingdom law since that time.

78: Therefore, all bills presented to the Australian parliaments since that time have
never received ‘Royal Assent’ as required in the Commonwealth Constitution, and
therefore remain as Bills and have never become laws.

79: Under Section 128 of the Australian Constitution, the Parliament of Australia had
no power to appoint a new Head of State in the guise of “Queen of Australia”. To
do so is to claim sovereignty over the People of Australia without the permission
of the people of Australia.

80: No such permission was ever given. (See Australian Parliament House website,
Referendum Results).

81: In a reply to a request made of the Australian Federal Attorney General by a Mr

Ian Henke under the Freedom of Information Act it was stated:
81.1: “I refer to your request to this department of 11 April 2001 pursuant to the
Freedom of Information Act 1982, for a copy of the document or
documents by which the Sovereign people of Australia, after the
attainment of independence and Australian Sovereignty, confer or
conferred Executive Authority on the “Queen of Australia”, in particular
the authority to appoint and empower, under section 2 of the Constitution,
a Governor-General to hold and exercise Executive Power under section
61 of the Constitution. I am, pursuant to arrangements by the secretary of
this department under sub-section 23 (1) of the Act, authorized to make
decisions on behalf of this department in relation to this matter.”

“I have accordingly reached the conclusion that no such document as

described by you exists.”

82: A second request for information made by Mr Henke to the Federal Attorney
General under the Freedom of Information Act, included a request for the
following:

82.1: “The empowering documents or legislation issued by the United Kingdom

Government or Parliament empowering the Queen of Australia to use the
Royal Prerogatives granted to the Queen of the United Kingdom, in
particular the Royal Sign Manual.”

83: In reply, under the hand of the Attorney General it was stated:

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 16

JULY 2008
 83.1: “I have reached the conclusion that no such document as described by
you in your request, exists.”

84: The Australian Parliaments:

84.1: did not get the power to appoint a Governor-General from the United
Kingdom, and,

84.2: did not get the power to appoint a Governor-General from the Australian
people.

85: Officers of the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND POLICE SERVICE” have sworn

allegiance to:

85.1: “the Government of the State of STATE OF QUEENSLAND” and or ,

85.2: “the Queen of Australia” (Queen Elizabeth II, of London).

86: By swearing such allegiance they have sworn allegiance to a power foreign to the
Individual Sovereign people of Australia.

87: Section 6 of the British “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act
1900 (UK)” clearly declares to the whole world that the British “Act to Constitute
the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 (UK)” refers to the “States” in their
PREVIOUS , and now untenable capacities as Colonies of the United Kingdom.

88: The following is the Oath of Allegiance sworn by ALL purported “Australian”
Parliamentarians of both the House and the Senate, as contained within the British
“Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 (UK)”.
88.1:
OATH
I, A.B., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true 
allegiance   to   Her   Majesty   Queen   Victoria,   Her   heirs   and 
successors according to law. SO HELP ME GOD)
                                  AFFIRMATION.
I, A.B., do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that 
I   will   be   faithful   and   bear   true   allegiance   to   Her 
Majesty Queen Victoria, Her heirs and successors according 
to law.

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 17

JULY 2008
 (NOTE.­The   name   of   the   King   or   Queen   of   the   United 
Kingdom  of  Great  Britain and Ireland  for the time being 
is to be substituted from time to time.)

89: The “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK” was not
amended prior to Australia becoming an Independent Sovereign Nation Member
State of the League of Nations (coinciding with the last purported Monarch of
Australias’ declaration of Australias’ Independence from the United Kingdom on
the 10th January 1920) to reflect the acknowledgement of Indigenous Australians
as part of the “number of the people of the Commonwealth or of a State or
other part of the Commonwealth” therefore:
89.1: Indigenous Australians are not a party to, nor obligated under the
“Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 UK” to
comply with any:
89.1.1: Law,

89.1.2: Rule,

89.1.3: Regulation, or other obligation,

any of which has the “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of
Australia 1900 UK” as the basis of its’ authority.

90: Origine/Indigenous Australians, are NOT:

90.1: part of any Australian or United Kingdom Colony (as defined
in the “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900
UK”), nor,

90.2: a “possession of the Queen (of the United Kingdom)” (as

defined by the “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia
1900 UK”), nor,

90.3: subject to ANY purported or actual law or other legality enacted or

otherwise given any power either:
90.3.1: by the (United Kingdoms’) Queen's most Excellent
Majesty, or,

90.3.2: by “Her heirs and or successors, or,

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 18

JULY 2008
 90.3.3: by and or with the advice and consent of the Lords
Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in the
United Kingdom Parliament.

94: Origine/Indigenous Australians are not, and never have been, lawfully subject to
any authority or authorities of ANY foreign power and or powers including the
invading British Monarchy, and or their heirs and or successors.

95: Sovereign Origine/Indigenous Australians are not, and never have been, legally
required to acknowledge, be subservient to, or be in any way obliging to and or
governed by and or subservient to either:

95.1: the Queen of the United Kingdom (whether Queen Victoria or

Elizabeth II), nor,

95.2: ANY of their “heir and or successors”,

whether as the Monarch of the Parliament of the Untied Kingdom, or the
purported monarch of the Commonwealth of Australia.

96: The reasons the Complainant demands the evidence of the seat of power and or
authority of the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND include, but are not limited to:

96.1: the COMPLAINANT has NO INTENTION of breaching ANY

LAWFUL LAW, and,

96.2: the Complainant is now, in possession of substantial documented

evidence which clearly shows the “Corrective Services Act 2006,
and all other Acts of the State, Territory and Commonwealth are
unenforceable due to legal problems in the legal effecting of these
Acts due to their authority coming from a power recognised by the
High Court of Australia as being a Foreign Power, and,

96.3: the Complainant was (and the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” was

aware that the Complainant was), at all times, reliant upon the
relying on his rights pursuant to His Sovereign traditional and
customary Nunukul Law, the common law and International Law
in the absence of any lawful “Australian” statute to the contrary.

96.4: the Complainant is a father, grandfather and great-grandfather and

respected Elder in His Nunukul community, and he is aware that he
has a social obligation to instil in his children, by both deed and
word, the necessity to obey lawful laws, and to peaceably protest
those which are oppressive, unjust, unlawful, unethical or immoral,
including those laws of a Foreign Power which are exercised in
Gondwanna Land, against the will of the Sovereign Origine

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 19

JULY 2008
 Peoples, but with the consent of the UK Parliament, in direct
contravention to all International law.

96.5: The Complainant is well respected in his community and seeks the
information demanded from the STATE OF QUEENSLAND in
order to validate its purported authority over the Complainant in
the Complainants lands, so as to be sure that the laws the STATE
OF QUEENSLAND is acting under are, in fact, legitimate and
lawful within Minjerrabah (the Complainants local tribal lands)
and Gondwanna Land.

97: At no point in time since nor before the Complainant first demanded the STATE
OF QUEENSLAND treaty with him, has the STATE OF QUEENSLAND
provided any evidence to disprove the Complainants claims to Social and Political
rights under International and the Common Law, nor has the STATE OF
QUEENSLAND provided the Complainant with any DOCUMENTED
EVIDENCE of either,
97.1: ANY of the alleged documented authority of the “STATE OF
QUEENSLAND” which the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND,
through senior officers, has declared exists.

97.2: ANY of the alleged existent documented evidence of the Authority

of the State and or Commonwealth Constitutions.

98: At all times since the Complainant first began contesting the legality of the
enforcement of the UK Act “An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia
1900 UK” or any law which looks to it for their legitimacy within Australia, the
“STATE OF QUEENSLAND” has maintained that the Complainants’ legal
argument was untenable, but never offered coherent, written evidence to the
support its contentions against the Complainants facts.

99: The Complainant relies upon his Legitimate Expectation under International Law,
that, until such times as the agents, assigns, officers and representatives of the
STATE OF QUEENSLAND have provided the evidence sought by the
Complainant evidencing the authority of the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND, its’
agents, assigns, officers and representatives, that He has the right to legitimately
expect that the legal position, as the Complainant puts forth in this NOTICE OF
WANT OF JURISDICTION, is true and correct.

100: The Complainant relies upon the fact that,

100.1: if the Complainants’ understanding of the Constitutional situation in
Australia – as detailed herein - is incorrect the STATE OF

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 20

JULY 2008
 QUEENSLAND, its agents, assigns, officers and representatives have a
Duty of Care Obligation to the Plaintiff to detail their evidence to the
contrary to the Complainant.

101: For the STATE OF QUEENSLAND to fail to provide the requested documented
evidence of the Head of authority of the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” to the
Complainant, whilst patently, clearly knowing the Complainant was waiting upon
such information to be provided in order to make a decision(s) (based upon such
information if it could be provided) to comply with the laws the “STATE OF
QUEENSLAND purport to be legitimate, and then after failing to provide such
information, to summarily deprive the Complainant of his rights pursuant to
International Law is both:
101.1: negligent, and

101.2: incompetent, and,

101.3: criminal, and,

101.4: illegal, and,

101.5: damaging to the Complainant.

102: The “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” owes a Duty of Care to the Complainant to

provide the evidence that the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” relies upon to
evidence its’ Head of authority etc.. PRIOR to further exercising its’ illegal statute
and other laws and its’ absent jurisdiction against the Complainant immediately.

103: The Complainant has, in writing, verbally and by action, notified the “STATE OF
QUEENSLAND” that the Complainant has no intention of breaching any
reasonable LAWFUL Law.

104: The Complainant has no intention of recognizing nor complying with any law
which derives its’ authority from:
104.1: a foreign power, and or,

104.2: a foreign government, and or,

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 21

JULY 2008
 104.3: an illegal government.

105: The Complainant has every intention of defending his Human Rights, including
those as recognized under International Law.

106: The Complainant intends to,

106.1: comply with Common Law, and,

106.2: comply with legitimate statute law, and,

106.3: live peaceably with his fellow Sovereign Independent Individual,

Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian Citizens.

107: The Complainant, has never had, does not have, and cannot perceive a time when,
the Complainant has, does or will willfully breach any law that can be evidenced
to be lawful and enforceable in respect of the Complainant pursuant to
International Law (the same basis upon which Australia as part of the “coalition
of the willing” entered Iraq).

108: In the High Courts’ Teoh case the majority extended this principle to say that
unincorporated treaties could give rise to a legitimate expectation that decision-
makers would act in accordance with the Convention. The following extracts
indicate the approach that was adopted.
108.1: Mason CJ and Deane J said:
'ratification by Australia of an international Convention is not to be
dismissed as a merely platitudinous or ineffectual act, particularly
when the instrument evidences internationally accepted standards to
be applied by courts and administrative authorities……………….
Rather, ratification of a Convention is a positive statement by the
executive government of this country to the world and to the
Australian people that the executive government and its agencies will
act in accordance with the Convention.

It is not necessary that a person seeking to set up such a legitimate

expectation should be aware of the Convention or should personally
entertain the expectation; it is enough that the expectation is
reasonable in the sense that there are adequate materials to support
it.'

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 22

JULY 2008
109: SECT 6 of the British “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act
1900 (UK)”, states:
109.1: 6. "The Commonwealth" shall mean the Commonwealth of Australia as
established under this Act.

"The States" shall mean such of the colonies of New South Wales, New
Zealand, Queensland, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia, and South
Australia, including the northern territory of South Australia, as for the
time being are parts of the Commonwealth, and such colonies or
territories as may be admitted into or established by the Commonwealth
as States; and each of such parts of the Commonwealth shall be called "a
State."

110: Section 80 of the Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 UK”
states:
110.1: Trial by jury
80. The trial on indictment of any offence against any law 
of the Commonwealth shall be by jury, and every such trial 
shall be held in the State where the offence was committed, 
and if the offence was not committed within any State the 
trial   shall   be   held   at   such   place   or   places   as   the 
Parliament prescribes.

111: Pursuant to the above facts the Complainant is not legally bound
to acknowledge the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” or “STATE OF
QUEENSLAND government” agent, assign, officer or
representative as having been created pursuant to any legal
authority or created upon any legal basis, unless and until the
requested documented evidence of such purported legal authority
is provided and the Complainant has been afforded an
opportunity to validate or disprove such evidence.

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 23

JULY 2008
 Pursuant to the above facts:
The Complainant DEMANDS:
1: That the matters concerning the Complainant be held Sine Die (including all
correspondence, Judgments, orders and or actions) until the STATE OF
QUEENSLAND satisfies the Complainants’ valid concerns regarding the:

1.1: Source of power, and,

.
1.2: Head of power, and,

1.3: Authority
of the STATE OF QUEENSLAND over the Complainant.

2: That, in relation to the Complainant, before ANY further legal action is

commenced and or continued by the STATE OF QUEENSLAND, that the STATE
OF QUEENSLAND provide to the Complainant those documents which are
required and necessary to prove the claim to jurisdiction over the Complainant,
including:

2.1: Letters Patent establishing the “Office of Governor – General for the
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Irelands’ Colony of The
Commonwealth of Australia” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal
Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the
office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the
Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and
Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.

2.2: Letters Patent establishing the “Colony of STATE OF

QUEENSLAND” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed
with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland
and Dominions thereto, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the
Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto

2.3: Letters Patent establishing the “Office of Governor for the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland’s Colony of STATE OF
QUEENSLAND” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed
with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland
and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of
Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the
Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and
Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 24

JULY 2008
2.4: The Writ of Commission for the “Governor General of The UK
Colony of the Commonwealth of Australia” under the Royal Sign
Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging,
recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor,
in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at
Westminster, London England.

2.5: The Writ of Commission for the “Governor of The UK Colony of

STATE OF QUEENSLAND”, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal
Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the
office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the
Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and
Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.

2.6: The Writ of Commission for the “Chief Justice of the UK Colony of
The Commonwealth of Australia”, under the Royal Sign Manual and
Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled
in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court
of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and
Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.

2.7: The Writ of Commission for the “Chief Justice of The UK Colony of
STATE OF QUEENSLAND”, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal
Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the
office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the
Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and
Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.

2.8: The Writ of Commission for the Police Commissioner of the “UK
Colony of STATE OF QUEENSLAND” under the Royal Sign Manual
and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and
filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High
Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 25

JULY 2008
 Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London
England.

2.9: The Writ of Commission for the “Minister of The Crown, known as
the Attorney General” of The UK Colony of STATE OF
QUEENSLAND” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed
with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland
and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of
Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the
Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and
Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England.

2.10: The Writ of Commission for the “Minister of The Crown, known as
the Attorney General” of The UK Commonwealth of Australia”,
under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal
of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions
thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the
Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging,
located at Westminster, London England.

2.11: The Writ of Commission for the “Senior Registrar of the Magistrates
Court of The UK Colony of STATE OF QUEENSLAND”, under the
Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto
belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High
Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at
Westminster, London

2.12: All documents you personally, and individually, rely on to establish your
“head of Power” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed
with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland
and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filed in the office of
Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the
Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and
Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London

2.13: All documents you personally, and individually rely on to establish “your
claimed Authority” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed
with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland
and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filed in the office of

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 26

JULY 2008
 Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the
Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and
Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London

2.14: All documents you personally, and individually rely on to establish your
claimed “Jurisdiction” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet,
sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office
of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the
Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and
Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London

2.15: A clear printed text of the oath sworn by any Judicial officer who hears
and or proposes to hear any matter in relation to the Complainants’ matter.

2.16: A current, legally binding, valid and legitimate Constitution; written and
approved BY ALL the individual Independent Sovereign People of the
independent entity Member State of the United Nations, Internationally
recognized as “The Commonwealth of Australia”: expressing their
freely given will of SELF- DETERMINATION under a Referendum
(Plebiscite) conducted with the Authorised blessing of the International
Community and International law; stating the source of that
AUTHORITY, the date of APPROVAL and REGISTRATION with The
Secretariat of The United Nations which shows acquiescence by the
Australian people to any Domestic British legislation.”.

2.17: A current, legally binding, valid and legitimate Constitution; written and
approved BY ALL the individual Independent Sovereign People in the
“STATE of STATE OF QUEENSLAND” evidencing their freely
expressed will of SELF- DETERMINATION to be subject to ANY
“government”, “law”, “court”, “judge”, “magistrate”, “justice of the
peace”, “police officer”, “prison officer”, “officer of the court”, “clerk of
the court”, agents”, or ANY other thing or person which is subaltern to the
Parliament of the United Kingdom, proven by a Referendum (Plebiscite)
conducted with the AUTHORISED blessing of the International
Community and International law; stating the source of that
AUTHORITY, the date of APPROVAL and REGISTRATION with The
Secretariat of The United Nations.

2.18: The Document whereby ALL the Individual Independent Sovereign

People of the Commonwealth of Australia requested Queen Elizabeth the
second, on the Throne, (re-established by ALL Sessions I & II William and
Mary 1688), in The High Court of The Regent’s Parliament of The United

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 27

JULY 2008
 Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging,
to represent them as their Sovereign.
2.19: Either:
2.19.1: A current legal and binding Treaty, dated BEFORE the 10th of
January 1920, between the Aboriginal Nations and Peoples of
Australia and the Parliament of the United Kingdom of England
and Ireland, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed
with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in
the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High
Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at
Westminster, London, which Treaty evidences the acquiescence to
British Colonial or other Law by the Independent, Sovereign,
Indigenous Nations and Peoples of Australia,

or,
2.19.2: A current legal and binding Treaty, dated AFTER the 10th of
January 1920, between the Aboriginal Nations and Peoples of
Australia and the Colonial Government of Australia and or the
Governments of the States of the Commonwealth of Australia,
which Treaty evidences the acquiescence to Australian Statutory
law and or British Colonial and or other law by the Independent,
Sovereign, Indigenous Nations and Peoples of Australia.

3: Should the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” not be able to produce all the above
required and purportedly existent and purportedly “available” EVIDENCE OF
THE PURPORTED AUTHORITY of the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” and
or the court or courts it is proposed will hear these matters, to the
Complainants’ COMPLETE SATISFACTION by the Friday 15th August 2008,
the Complainant demands that the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” provide Certified
Documentation evidencing:

3.1: Written permission from the United Nations to use Foreign Law, including
British Domestic Law, in contravention of Article 2: paragraphs 1 and 4 of
the United Nations Charter of 1945;

3.2: Written permission from the League of Nations to use Foreign Law in the
Commonwealth of Australia in direct contravention of Articles I, X and XX
of the League of Nations Covenant of 1919.

3.3: Permissions, in writing, from The United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Ireland Parliament to continue to use United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Ireland Law in the Independent Sovereign Nation State of The
Commonwealth of Australia, Assented to, and Duly Signed and Sealed,
under The Great Seal of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland,

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 28

JULY 2008
 by King George the Fifth, and Counter-Signed by The Lord High Chancellor
of The High Court of Parliament of The United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Ireland; and
3.3.1: including an Authentic, Certified Copy of Documentation
evidencing the Registration of same by The Office of the Clerk of
The Crown in Chancery of The High Court of The Parliament of
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland at Westminster,
prior to January 10, 1920.

4: Clear written evidence of the freely expressed permission by ALL the Individual
Independent Sovereign People of The Commonwealth of Australia, for the
continued use of Foreign Colonial Law, within:

4.1: The Commonwealth of Australia, and,

4.2: the State of STATE OF QUEENSLAND , and,

4.3: within the Boundary of the land area within the continent of Australia,
after January 10, 1920; (when clearly ALL FOREIGN LAW (Colonial,
Imperial or otherwise) was deemed to be ABROGATED and ultravirus with
respect of Australia at International Law under the TERMS AND
CONDITIONS of Membership to the League of Nations, under The
Covenant of The League of Nations Covenant 1919, Upon the several
Independent Nations Entity States signing The Covenant at the Peace
Conference at Versailles.
4.3.1: Both The Commonwealth of Australia and The United Kingdom of
Great Britain and) Ireland were ORIGINAL Independent Signatory
Nation Member States.

5: Clear written Certified evidence of Full General Assembly of The United Nations’
Revocation of its Resolution 2625 (XXV) of October 24, 1970 Declaring ALL
British Acts (both Colonial and Imperial) as legal and binding on the Individual,
Independent Sovereign people of Australia.

6: Evidence that;
6.1: All Constitutions (including Australian 1900 UK & WA, SA, Vic, Tas,
NSW and Queensland).

6.2: The Statute of Westminster 1931,

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 29

JULY 2008
 6.3: Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942, and,

6.4: The Australian Acts (UK and CTA),

are not NULL AND VOID in respect of the Commonwealth of Australia..

7: Full written Certified evidence of WHY the British Colony of the Commonwealth
of Australia Constitution Act 1900 UK of the Parliament of the United Kingdom
of England and Ireland, assented by the Regent on the Throne in the High Court
of THAT Parliament at Westminster, being a FOREIGN ACT OF A FOREIGN
NATION, IS NOT registered at the United Nations in Geneva nor New York,
as a RECIPROCAL MUTUAL TREATY which is required under International
Law before it (as a Foreign Law) can be exercised within the land of the
Commonwealth of Australia.

8: That the any other “court” other than the purported High Court of Australia, so as
to facilitate this matter being determined by the only purported “Australian” court
which is purportedly authorised to hear challenges to the purported “Australian
Constitution” and or defences taken pursuant to International Treaties, pursuant to
Section 80 of the “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900
UK” , set this matter aside for hearing by the purported High Court of Australia,
which, pursuant to the particulars of this NOTICE OF WANT OF
JURISDICTION, is the ONLY purported “court” in Australia which might
purportedly possibly have the purported authority to hear this matter under
“Australia’s” purported “Constitution” (ie: the “Act to Constitute the
Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK”).

9: That the STATE OF QUEENSLAND, its’ agents, assigns, officers and

representatives accept, acknowledge and comply with the Complainants rights as
a Sovereign on Gondwanna Land (Australia).

10: That the STATE OF QUEENSLAND, its’ agents, assigns, officers and
representatives accept, acknowledge and comply with the Complainants do not
interfere with the rights of the Complainant to exercise His Sovereign rights
within and upon His Sovereign land, Minjerrabah, within Gondwanna Land
(Australia)

Pursuant to the above FACTS and DEMANDS:

TAKE NOTICE that if you fail to produce the required documented evidence of the
purported authority of the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” by the Friday 15th August 2008
and or fail to comply with the aforesaid Demands OR demonstrate a proper DEFENCE
against ALL the FACTS upon which this NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION is
founded, then it shall be taken that the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” ADMITS:

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 30

JULY 2008
1: THAT the facts as stated in this NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION are true
and correct AND,

2: THAT the demands arising from those facts are proper and reasonable AND,

3: THAT the Demands of this NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION must be

complied with AND,

4: THAT the Complainant is entitled to costs and damages for any breach of the
Complainants rights as stated herein as afforded by the Schedule of Fees
forwarded to the Office of the Premier of the STATE OF QUEENSLAND, AND,

5: THAT any public or private harassment and intimidation of the Complainant and
his family and community by officers the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” its’
agents, assigns, officers and or representatives under direction of the Queen of the
Parliament of the Untied Kingdom of England and Ireland in her illegal purported
capacity of the “Queen of Australia” are remedial by way of an action
determinable by the Elders’ Council of the Complainants Nation.

6: THAT it understands, and accepts that actions against those officers referred to in
paragraph 5 (immediately above) would be taken against those officers
personally.

7: THAT it has no authority at law to use any law which has its’ head of authority in
either the;
7.1: Parliament of the Untied Kingdom,
and or,
7.2: the Monarch of the Parliament of the United Kingdom,
and or,
7.3: Parliaments of THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA or any state
and or territory thereof,
and or,
7.4: the Queen of the Parliament of the United Kingdom in her purported and
illegal capacity as the “queen of Australia”.

………………………………..
Dennis Bruce Walker

Signed before me this ……. Day

of ………………………….2008

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 31

JULY 2008
At ………………………….. NSW 2………, ………………………………..JP.

NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION 32

JULY 2008