Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
351-363, 1990
Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
l. INTRODUCTION
352
orientation relationship, separated by a planar interface with normal n. A symmetry operation performed
on this system with an operator that is common to
both crystals in this orientation will restore precipitate and matrix crystals independently to congruence,
but transform the normal n to an orientation n',
crystallographically equivalent to the original. If this
procedure is repeated for all such common symmetry
elements, then all possible orientations of the interface will be defined, generating a form for the precipitate crystal that is compatible with symmetry.
Those point symmetry elements common to precipitate and matrix crystals in the observed orientation relationship constitute the intersection point
group, H. The point group H defines [1] effectively the
symmetry of the Wulff plot, which is commonly
employed to define the equilibrium shape of a precipitate nucleus [3, 4]. The proposal which thus emerges
is that the morphology of a solid state precipitate
must be consistent with the symmetry of the intersection group, H. The intersection point group
may be determined simply by inspection of superimposed stereographic projections of the precipitate
and matrix crystals in the observed orientation relationship. This symmetry analysis has been applied
to precipitates in a limited range of metallic and
ceramic alloys [1, 5-10] and shown to account successfully for the observed morphologies. The purpose
of the present work was to determine the applicability
of the analysis to the range of precipitate forms
observed in the AI-Ge system.
The A I - G e system has a number of features which
make it interesting for study in this context. The
equilibrium phase diagram is a simple eutectic with
the terminal phases comprising an Al-based solid
solution and nominally pure Ge. The solid solubility
of Ge in A1 is a maximum 6.9 wt% [11] at the eutectic
temperature (424C) and decreases rapidly with decreasing temperature to < 0 . 5 w t % at 200C. For
dilute alloys of Ge in AI, solution treated, quenched
and aged in the temperature range 50-250C, precipitates of essentially pure Ge form directly from
supersaturated solid solution, apparently without formation of any intermediate metastable phases. These
precipitates adopt a variety of morphologies depending largely on the conditions of heat treatment
[6-8,11-13]. In a study of a 4 . 5 w t % G e alloy,
Lorimer and Nicholson [11, 13] have reported that
samples aged at 140C contained predominantly triangular platelets of Ge on {111}A~planes with edges
parallel to (110)AI, and truncated {1 l l}A1 platelets
with edges parallel to both (110)Al and (100)Ai.t In
each case the Ge lattice was reported to have an
identity (or cube-cube) orientation relationship with
that of the matrix phase. For ageing at higher temperatures ( > 200C), rod-like precipitates parallel to
(100)al were more commonly observed. K6ster [14]
fThis result is recorded as reported [11], but it is noted that
(100)A t directions do not lie in {111}Aj habit planes.
353
Fig. 1. Transmission electron mirographs showing Ge precipitates of predominantly triangular plate morphology
projected normal to (a) (111 )Al, and (b) (110)Ai zone axes.
appearance by an operation of inversion (or a rotation of 180 about the habit plane normal). Electron
microdiffraction patterns recorded from individual
triangular plates parallel to (111)A1 and (001 )AI zone
axes are reproduced in Fig. 2, indexed in accordance
with the f.c.c. (a = 0.4050 nm) and diamond cubic
(a = 0.5658 nm) lattices of pure AI and Ge respectively. The superimposed (111) patterns, Fig. 2(a),
do not permit an unambiguous solution for the
orientation relationship.? However, the patterns in
Fig. 2(b) indicate that [00116e and [001]A~ zone axes
are also parallel, confirming that the orientation
relationship is cube-cube.
354
+I
++
+1
m +
+0
+
+l
m+o +
0+
0+
+ + +
++ 0+ +
+0
o+
+m
+
+
0+
+
+
AI [-{11] zone
Ge ~ 1 1 ] zone
~)i!i
+
+
Q%
*
Q
+
t
+
+
++
++
+
+
+
020Ai
m~
+~'~-040Go
+
- - ~ " - -+- ' - - r+~ 220Ge
200AI
~
+
+
+ + ~/+
#
++
+000+
+ + +
+
+
+ +
o*
~_
+ +
+
:e
4OO
+
+
AI [001] zone
Ge [001] zone
Fig. 2. Electron microdiffraction patterns for Ge precipitates of triangular plate morphology showing:
(a) [I1 l]c~//[I11]A1 and (b) [001]c,,//[001]AI.
++
++
II
+
355
m000
1
+
020A ~
++
~_
200AI
- +
022GO
220Ge
++
O+
~-
250 nm
AI [0011 zone
Ge ~11] zone
I1
.,~---~11Ge
+ 1
OR
+O- ~
000
002A I
DO
200AI
220Ge
AI [010] zone
Ge [172] zone
Fig. 4. (a) Broad (I00)AI Ge lath and corresponding microdiffraction patterns in which [TI 1]~//[001]A6
(b) narrow (100)A ~ Ge lath (centrefield) and corresponding rnicrodiffraction patterns in which
[1r2]c~//[0]'0]A~.
356
a.
1111]Ge
b.
[oo~l~
[100]~ ~
[010]~
Fig. 5. Schematic representation of (a) (100)A I lath morphology for Ge precipitates and associated orientation
relationship, and (b) six variants of lath morphology distinguishable macroscopically in a given matrix orientation.
microdiffraction patterns recorded from the rod in
Fig. 7 may, for example, be indexed in accordance
with an orientation relationship in which
(I10)Gd/(001)~a and
[110]c~//[110]m//rod axis.
This relationship is shown in stereographic projection
in Fig. 8. In contrast, the patterns recorded from the
rod in Fig. 9 indicate an orientation relationship in
which
(~21)Ge//(001)A l and
[110]c~//[110]Al//rod axis.
These two relationships differ by a rotation of 19.5
about the common ( l l 0 ) directions parallel to the
rod axis, Fig. 8. Examples were also detected of a
third relationship in which [l 10]Ge//[110]AIand (I 11)c~
is approximately parallel to (001)~. It would seem
that the ( l l 0 ) A | rods may adopt a range of orientation relationships characterized by a common rod
axis (i.e. [ll0]Gd/[ll0]~), but in which the relative
rotation of precipitate and matrix lattices about this
axis is not determined uniquely.
(il 1)ce//(il
[21 l]Ge//[110]A I.
71o-
357
_ _
221a,
gg...._._.~ 2 ~ a 0
1TOAI
Axis
221Ge
110AI
001AI
110AI
221Ge
Fig. 8. Steregraphic projection showing orientation relationship for (110)k I Ge rods in which (]'10)c.e//(001)g I and
[ll0]6e//[ll0]A1. The relative rotation about the rod axis
[ l l 0 ] g I required to produce the alternative relationship,
(~21)Ge//(001)AI and [11016e//[110]AI, is indicated.
v -I..
+
+-_-_
b
"~+ +
I~
+
~+
+
+ -~
-~
+ 0+ +
[]
+ ++
+
+ +O +
++
+
[] +
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
0
+
~
+0+
+
++ * + + +,
+
+
o+o0+ + + * %
+
++-+~
+ ~
~
+/--,/,o
+_
+
++
O+
+l, +-
+ +. / + ++/+/~+/o+ \+o+ +o
+
[]
/+
//+
/+
+~
220Get-220AI
AI [001] zone
Ge [110] zone
358
luu nm
B--- 001
0 ~ AI
Ge
220
.
000
202Ge
I
022Ge
000
220 AI
422Ge
220A1
422Ge
111 Ge
359
n 311AI
T~TAI
d
202 AI
Fig. 12. (a), (b) Electron microdiffraction patterns from hexagonal precipitate plate of the type shown in
Fig. I1, (c) schematic solution to (a) with [Tll]~//[Tll]AI, and (d) schematic solution to (b) with
[~13]c~//[T12]aj. The schematic patterns have been computed for a hexagonal structure derived from the
Ge diamond cubic lattice by regular twinning on every five (T11)c~planes. Note that only those reflections
occurring in normal [T11]c~and [~13]~ zone axis patterns are indexed; the additional reflections arise from
fine-scale twinning or faulting parallel to (I1 l)c~.
faulting at regular, periodic intervals. It was not
possible to readily simulate diffraction patterns for
structures arising from random twinning or faulting.
However, it is to be anticipated that similar results
would be achieved lbr structures randomly twinned
or faulted, provided that the average separation of
the planar defects was on the same scale.
For an hexagonal plate observed parallel to the
[l12]A ~ zone axis and with the above orientation
relationship between precipitate and matrix phases,
the electron beam will be close to a [~13]Ge zone axis
in the precipitate phase. The expected electron
diffraction pattern for the two variants of the precipitate phase which are twin-related across (Tll)o e is
shown in Fig. 13. Comparison with the observed
diffraction pattern, Fig. 12(b) indicates that significant amounts of both variants are present in the
precipitate. This suggests that the structure is
twinned, for if the disruption to the (11 I)Ge stacking
was due to stacking faults alone, the expected diffraction pattern would show strong reflections for a single
variant only, with much weaker intensity for those
reflections corresponding to the alternative variant,
360
-1+
I
and vacancies in appropriate ratios. It has been
@ +0
+
0
suggested [8] that the variation in precipitate mor+ @+
0
+ + + +
+ + + 4-t+
phology may be associated with differences in the
required vacancy concentration for a given form and
1000
I~@422 Ge
local variations in vacancy supersaturation in the
+ + 4- +
+
+
+ + +~+
matrix phase. It appears likely that the restricted size
0 4- +
0
e1"11Ge 0 + ~ O
of each of the observed shapes is to be attributed to
+
I I~'IAI
+~1220AI
the large volume accommodation that must accom4-Ipany growth.
+
+ + 4-I+
4- + + +
A summary is presented in Table 1 of those
orientation relationships that have been observed for
Ge precipitates in A1-Ge solid solution and the
AI ~12] zone
precipitate morphologies associated with them. The
PRECIPITATES IN AN AI Ge ALLOY--I
361
Fig. 14. Sequence of micrographs showing small tetrahedral precipitate tilted systematically about [110]AI .
(a) [l12]A], (b) ~7 from [TI2]A 1 towards [00I]AI, (C) ~23 from []'12]Al towards [001]At, (d) [00I]AI,
(e) corresponding [001]A 1 z o n e axis pattern, (f) ~ 16 from [001]AI towards [l]'2]g].
apparently increases the misfit in interatomic spacing
along parallel directions within these planes. Careful
analysis of microdiffraction patterns from individual
Ge precipitates in this orientation indicates that the
plates are twinned parallel to the habit plane on the
scale of approximately every 4-5 (lll)Ge planes.
There are thus a potential eight crystallographically
equivalent variants of the precipitate phase in a given
orientation of the matrix phase.
Those orientation relationships (3-5, Table 1)
differing from cube-cube by relative rotations of
362
1I
30 Rolation
I
~;
I[111] Gel/ ~11]A I I HexagnalPlatesnO11)Al
Tetra . ra ou . .(1111.,
--
,50Rotation
R::a7n
[ (~11)Ge fl ~11)A!
I [211] Ge// [110]AI
[OOl1Ge// [OOll~j
(~11)Ge // (001)AI
[1101Ge// [110]AI
45o Rotation
I (~11)Ge# (O01)AI
11101Ge// IIOOIAI
/
15"8 /
[1101Ge// [1101Aj
Rotation
(221)Ge// (O01)AI
[11o1Ge// [1101Ai
I 9.7o
Rotation
('110)Ge// (011)AI
[110} Ge// [100]AI
[lOO]At Rods
[110]AI Rods
01
19.5
Rotation
[1101Ge/,I [IO0]AI
[1101Ge # 11101Ai
l 450
1110]Ge fl [100]AI Rolation
I
11101AI Rods
8/
Plateson (O01)AI
relationship (6) by rotations about this axis. A relative rotation of the Ge lattice by 9.7 renders
(T10)Ge//(011)AI, and a further rotation of 45
has (001)Ge//(001)A 1. The corresponding precipitate
morphologies appear to be rods parallel to [100]AI and
platelets on (001)A 1 respectively, although the latter
has only been justified on the basis of symmetry
analysis [6] and has yet to be confirmed experimentally. Observed parallel to the long axis, the (100)A ~
rods or laths invariably contain internal twins on
{ l l l } G e planes parallel to the long axis [6-8]. For
s o m e ( 1 0 0 ) A 1 rods, complex multiple twins with
approximate 5-fold symmetry have been detected
[7, 8] along the rod axis; such twinning was not
observed in the present work.
It is finally interesting to note that those orientation relationships designated 5 and 7 in the present
survey (Table 1) are equivalent crystallographically,
but associated with rod-shaped precipitates parallel
to different directions in the matrix phase. Further
discussion of the variation in orientation relationship
and precipitate morphology will follow the symmetry
analysis reported in Part II [22].
REFERENCES
363