thriving. They had many resources and a peaceful society. One day, Community B a community that had outgrown its available resourceswent roaming with a large military. Community B encountered Community A and became envious of their abundant supplies of food, water and shelter. Community B invaded and stole Community As means of gathering resources. Community B enslaved Community A, requiring them to either labor for resources, or be killed. This is the beginning of history ever since then, history has been a series of two things: the Haves stealing from the Have Nots, or the Have Nots taking back. However, history is not primarily about the seizing of resources and products. History is primarily about the seizing of the means of production for instance, lets say a trucker (who owns his own truck), has a semitrailer full of goods. As you are sleeping, a group of bandits steals the goods in the semitrailer. This is simple theft, because the trucker still control the means of production: the truck. However, if you are a trucker and a group of bandits steal your truck, they are seizing the means of your production. Those bandits
now not only own the goods in the
semitrailer, they also control the means for any future production of economic value the way this works in a capitalist economy, exemplified by the U$A, is through your employers wages. Lets imagine a trucker again, with a single truck. After earning $1000 for every delivery, the trucker earns enough money to buy another truck. He then hires an employee to drive the second truck. However, the employee doesnt get $1000 for every delivery. The trucker who owns both trucks gets the money, and then gives as little as possible to the employee. Since the owner of the trucks is getting more money, he is able to buy more trucks. Fast forward and the owner now has 100s of trucks. He hasnt actually driven a truck in years, and yet profits greatly from the labor of his employees. The trucker has gone from gentle laborer, earning money honestly, to bourgeoisie, controlling the means of production and stealing as much of the true laborer's earnings as possible so, what is the rhetorical question of history? It is this: why have we still not achieved equality, liberation and peace? it is a rhetorical question because it is asked by the bourgeoisie, and they know the answer, while hoping we dont catch on: Exploitation of the People. Unfortunately
for them, We know were exploited, and WE
ARE PISSED OFF Capital is dead labor, which, vampire-like, lives only by sucking living labor, and lives the more, the more labor it sucks. - Marx
2. the rhetorical question in practice
a common misunderstanding is that the true economic divide is between rich and poor, or between blue collar and white collar. This has been a helpful tool for the bourgeoisie to divide the proletariat against each other. However, the union plumber and the upper-middle class accountant are both exploited for their labor, even if, for social
and economic reasons, the accountant is
more easily placated with higher wages. Once the rich proletariat acknowledge that they are exploited workers, and not aligned with the bourgeoisie, class consciousness can be achieved a major tenet of communism (that seems particularly concerning to Americans) is the abolition of property. This concept is of course misrepresented by the bourgeoisie to discourage curious workers from looking into alternatives. Under communism, strangers wont be able to walk into your home and use your stuff. You would not need to share a toothbrush. You will still have possessions. Capitalism trains us to believe property and possessions are
synonymous. Property is any potential
means of production. This is why houses are property: they can be exploited for capital by charging tenets to live there. Your toothbrush is not your property, its your possessionsyou dont profit from labor exploitation if you possess a toothbrush. You profit off labor exploitation when you control means of production property damage is not violence. In fact, property violence is in many ways not a legitimate crime. Property is simply the belongings of the people, that have been seized by the wealthy agents of an illegitimate nation (the U$A). Their property was built by laborers, for laborers to use, and they shouldnt have the right to control this property. property damage, therefore, is the people destroying their own belongings that were seized by the rich The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. - Marx
3. the people's answer
the American Dream, and similar ideological tools used by capitalism, is rooted in the idea that someday, with enough hard work, the trucker can become the bourgeoisie. This once was true for some, and still is true for very few. But, the U$A harps on this idea so strongly that for many Americans, they
keep banking on deferred prosper until their
dying breath. we must reject the American Dream, and embrace the Class that we were coerced into. We must reject a system that only values us as long as we labor, and leaves us to die when we no longer can Will you side with the gentle laborer on each side of you, selling 40+ hours of their time and labor to the same greedy master as you? Or will you be a thug for the anti-Union, anti-Worker Porky, leeching off you and trading the fruit of your labor for excesses like foie gras, limousins, yachts, and jets. Will you side with the banker who owns many houses internationally, when you have to save money all year for a week-long vacation, one state away? Do you side with Robespierre and the Jacobins or do you side with the ancien rgime? History is converging in this very moment, WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON? If the U.S. monopoly capitalist groups persist in pushing their policies of aggression and war, the day is bound to come when they will be hanged by the people of the whole world. The same fate awaits the accomplices of the United States. - Chairman Mao