Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
Appellant
CASE INFORMATION
Initiating Document:
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Active
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Criminal
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Perjury
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
No
No
Lock, Joshua D.
Goldberg Katzman, P.C.
Goldberg Katzman PC
4250 Crums Mill Rd Ste 301
Harrisburg, PA 17112-2889
(717) 234-4161
Phone No:
Amicus
Pro Se:
Fax No:
Caterbone, Stanley J.
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Yes
Stanley J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
4:36 P.M.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
No
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Steele, Kevin R.
Montgomery County District Attorney's Office
PO Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
(610) 278-3098
Fax No:
Phone No:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
11/22/2016
Notice of Appeal
85.50 11/30/2016
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
2016-SPR-E-002063
85.50
Court Below:
County:
Order Appealed From:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Judge
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Filed Date
Content Description
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
4:36 P.M.
Filed Date
December 9, 2016
Other
Participant Type
Filed By
Eldridge, Lisa A.
Document Name: Per TC Judge's chambers - Extension granted throught 1/6/17 to file 1925(b) statement.
Comment: Opinion will be filed by 3/6/17.
December 16, 2016
Order
Per Curiam
Comment: Upon consideration of the Petitioner's "Request The Courtesy Of The Court To Appear Pro Se And To
File An Amicus Curaie [sic] Brief In Support Of The Following," filed by "Stan J. Caterbone," the
petitioner shall not be permitted to present oral argument.
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :
v.
KATHLEEN KANE
Page 1 of 4
amicus brief does not support the position of any party, as for the appellant.
(b) Oral argument.Oral argument may be presented by amicus curiae only as the appellate court
may direct. Requests for leave to present oral argument shall be by application and will be granted
only for extraordinary reasons.
Official Note
Where the amicus cannot comply with the requirements of this rule because of ignorance of the
pendency of the question, relief may be sought under Rule 105(b). The last eight words of the rule
are new. In Piccirilli Bros. v. Lewis, 282 Pa. 328, 336, 127 Atl. 832, 835 (1925) the court noted the
applicability of this rule to public officers who are represented by official counsel with an adverse
position.
The 2011 amendment to the rule clarified when those filing amicus curiae briefs should serve and file
their briefs when the appellant has chosen or the parties have been directed to proceed under the
rules related to large records (Rule 2154(b)), advance text (Rule 2187(b)) and definitive copies (Rule
2185(c)). Under those rules, the appellant may defer preparation of the reproduced record until after
the briefs have been served. The parties serve on one another (but do not file) advance texts of their
briefs within the times required by Rule 2187. At the time they file their advance texts, each party
includes certified record designations for inclusion in the reproduced record. The appellant must then
prepare and file the reproduced record within 21 days of service of the appellees advance text (Rule
2186(a)(2)). Within 14 days of the filing of the reproduced record, each party that served a brief in
advance text may file and serve definitive copies of their briefs. The definitive copy must include
references to the pages of the reproduced record, but it may not otherwise include changes from the
advance text other than correction of typographical errors. Those filing amicus curiae briefs may
choose to serve an advance text and then file and serve definitive copies according to the procedure
required of the parties or they may choose to file a definitive brief without citations to the reproduced
record.
January 18, 2017
Respectfully,
____________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
Page 2 of 4
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed,
and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct
and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to
Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation
and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and
expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks
on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and
some communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced
Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How
long can Lancaster County and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the
ISC Scandel (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?
Page 3 of 4
I hereby certify that on or about January 18, 2017 SERVICE VIA USPS REGULAR OR
PRIORITY MAIL WAS SENT TO THE FOLLOWING:
Lock, Joshua D.
Law Firm: Goldberg Katzman, P.C.
Address: Goldberg Katzman PC
4250 Crums Mill Rd Ste 301
Harrisburg, PA 17112-2889
Phone No: (717) 234-4161
Served: Kevin R. Steele
Service Method: Email
Email: ksteele@montcopa.org
Service Date: July 13, 2016
Address:
Phone: 610-278-3098
Representing: Appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Page 4 of 4
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :
v.
KATHLEEN KANE
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
2. In support of any other relief this Court deems just and proper.
The following Amicus should provide this Court with the proper jurisdiction for legal standing
to consider this Amicus according to Rule 531 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Procedure.
Page 1 of 23
(2) In an appeal proceeding under Rules 2154(b), 2185(c) and 2187(b), any amicus curiae shall file
and serve its brief within the time allowed by these rules for service of the advance text of the brief
by the party whose position as to affirm and or reversal the amicus brief will support or, if the amicus
brief does not support the position of any party, within the time allowed by these rules for service of
the advance text by the appellant. Alternatively, the amicus curiae may, but is not required to, serve
an advance text and then file and serve a definitive copy of its brief. If the amicus curiae chooses to
serve an advance copy and then file and serve a definitive copy, its deadlines for each are the same
as for the party whose position as to affirm and or reversal the amicus brief supports or, if the
amicus brief does not support the position of any party, as for the appellant.
(b) Oral argument.Oral argument may be presented by amicus curiae only as the appellate court
may direct. Requests for leave to present oral argument shall be by application and will be granted
only for extraordinary reasons.
Official Note
Where the amicus cannot comply with the requirements of this rule because of ignorance of the
pendency of the question, relief may be sought under Rule 105(b). The last eight words of the rule
are new. In Piccirilli Bros. v. Lewis, 282 Pa. 328, 336, 127 Atl. 832, 835 (1925) the court noted the
applicability of this rule to public officers who are represented by official counsel with an adverse
position.
The 2011 amendment to the rule clarified when those filing amicus curiae briefs should serve and file
their briefs when the appellant has chosen or the parties have been directed to proceed under the
rules related to large records (Rule 2154(b)), advance text (Rule 2187(b)) and definitive copies (Rule
2185(c)). Under those rules, the appellant may defer preparation of the reproduced record until after
the briefs have been served. The parties serve on one another (but do not file) advance texts of their
briefs within the times required by Rule 2187. At the time they file their advance texts, each party
includes certified record designations for inclusion in the reproduced record. The appellant must then
prepare and file the reproduced record within 21 days of service of the appellees advance text (Rule
2186(a)(2)). Within 14 days of the filing of the reproduced record, each party that served a brief in
advance text may file and serve definitive copies of their briefs. The definitive copy must include
references to the pages of the reproduced record, but it may not otherwise include changes from the
advance text other than correction of typographical errors. Those filing amicus curiae briefs may
choose to serve an advance text and then file and serve definitive copies according to the procedure
required of the parties or they may choose to file a definitive brief without citations to the reproduced
record.
Page 2 of 23
____________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed,
and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct
and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to
Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation
and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and
expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks
on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and
some communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced
Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How
long can Lancaster County and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the
ISC Scandel (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?
Page 3 of 23
Page 4 of 23
In 2009 THE AMICUS Proposed an ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS
HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster,
Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work
of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these
horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to individuals who are being
harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep
individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency
devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons. THE AMICUS again
reintroduced the bill to the Pennsylvania General Assembly in 2015 and frequented the
Pennsylvania Capitol trying to find support and a sponsor; which THE AMICUS still does to this
day.
In 2006 THE AMICUS began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is
listed as "FULT" on the NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group,
Ltd., a full service financial firm, Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the
strategic vision for his company and the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public
offering efforts in dealing with Fulton Financial. THE AMICUS has been in recent discussions with
the Fulton Financial Board of Directors with regards to various complaints dealing with such issues
as the Resource Bank acquisition and the subprime failures. THE AMICUS believes that Fulton
Financial needs management to become more aggressive in it's strategic planning and the
performance it expects from it's management team in order to increase shareholder value.
Expanding the footprint of the regional bank has not yielded an increase to the bottom line that is
consistent with the expectations of shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local banking
institutions acquired by larger regional banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton Financial will
see in it's local marketplace as well as in it's regional footprint.
In 2005 THE AMICUS, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in
current litigation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the
United States Third District Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania
Superior Court, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. These litigations include violations of intellectual property rights,
anti-trust violations, and interference of contracts relating to several business interests. Central to
this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG
Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal
Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion
Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates
back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was solicited by ISC executives for
professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of RICO Civil Complaint in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288.
In 2005 Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn for their attempts to withhold the
Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center & Marriot.
We also proposed an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel Brunswick and
Lancaster Square to all of the major stakeholders. The Lancaster County Convention Center is
finally under construction with a March 2009 Opening date.
In 2005 THE AMICUS was selected to attend the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City
after submission of an essay with and application. THE AMICUS received the invitation from
Bruce R. Lindsey, Chief Executive Officer of the William J. Clinton Foundation.
In 2005 THE AMICUS began our philanthropic endeavors by spending our energies and working
with such organizations as; ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org, The Clinton Global
Initiative, Lancaster Convention Center Authority, Lancaster Chamber of Commerce, Toms Project
Hope, People to People International, GlobalWarming.org, Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide
Page 5 of 23
Page 6 of 23
In 1991 THE AMICUS was elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador
Program, which was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was
founded to To give specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together
and effectively communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-toface scientific, technical, and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961, under
President John F. Kennedy, the State Department established a non-profit private foundation to
administer the program. We were scheduled to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to
discuss printing and publishing technologies with scientists and technicians around the world.
In 1990 THE AMICUS had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the governments
technology think tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). THE AMICUS coauthored the article Escaping the Unix Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was published in
the magazine DISC, then one of the leading publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most
all call centers deploy that technology whenever you call an 800 number, and voice recognition is
prevalent in all types of applications involving telecommunications.
In 1989 THE AMICUS had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S.
domestic companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with
commercial companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign companies.
THE AMICUS performed services and contracts for the Department of Defense, NASA, National
Institution of Standards & Technology (NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence
Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft, AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, and
a host of others. THE AMICUS also was working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was
developing various interactive mapping technologies, which is now a major asset of Map Quest.
Map Quest is the premier provider of mapping software and applications for the internet and is
often used in delivering maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had arranged for
High Industries to sell American Helix, the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly. We
had brokered a deal and the executives from Donnellys Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to
discuss the deal and perform due diligence of the manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield
Industrial Park.
In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York and Tony Bongiovi retained me as executive
producer of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a
digital format; the first of its kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and
created the concept for the Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the
copyright and marketing formula of the DOLBY technology trademark.
We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and
commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording
industry featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of
Philadelphia was the lead patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station
Studios was the brainchild of Tony Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown
when he was 15. Tony and Power Station Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the
country, and were responsible for developing Bon Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients
included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper, Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones,
Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station Studios had produced the original
Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture. It was released for distribution and was
the number one Sound Track recording of its time.
Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We
had developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the
Digital Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the
commercialization of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry
simultaneously with the release of the Digital Movie.
Page 7 of 23
THE AMICUS also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark
logo for the technology, similar to the DOLBY sound systems trademark. The acronyms stand for
the Power Station Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies
on a portable medium, a compact disc.
In 1987 THE AMICUS had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was
funded by a major banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from
$3 to $100 million dollars. Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received
solicitations from developers across the country. We were also very attractive to companies that
wanted to raise capital that include both debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could
raise equity funding through private placements, and debt funding through FMG Mortgage
Banking. We were retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood, California to secure financing of
their postproduction Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North Carolina. We had secured
refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the midst of replacing
the current loan that was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and discussions
with Drew Anton of the Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We were
quickly seeking commitments for real estate deals from New York to California. We also had a
number of other prominent local developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen
Kugal, High Industries, and the Marty Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt.
30 Outlets). We were constantly told that our financing packages were more competitive than
local institutions.
In 1986 THE AMICUS had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial
services organization comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had
developed a stock purchase program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership
in the new firm. FMG had financial planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys,
realtors, liability insurance services, tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of our
corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we had 24 people on staff, had approximately
12 offices in Pennsylvania, and
several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and
our advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees
from the other professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at
about $3 to $4 million.
In 1985 THE AMICUS developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent
Camp for the Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams
scouting departments. (See Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps
were dependant on the team scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had
developed a strategy of video taping the camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the
teams, to all of the scouting departments for teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My
brother was signed at that camp by the Ottawa Roughriders of the CFL, and went on to be a
leading receiver while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues most prominent quarterbacks. My brother
also played 2 years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino was starting quarterback. We were
a Certified Agent for the National Football League Players Association. Gene Upshaw, the President
of the NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp, while we were at a Conference for
agents of the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article about our camp and associated it
with other camps that were questionable about their practices. Actually, that was the very reason
for our camp. We had attended many other camps around the country that were not very well
organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants, with one player coming
from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a professional
production company filming the entire camp, while THE AMICUS did the editing and produced the
video. The well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the
Dallas Cowboys, had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him
and said he looked forward to reviewing the tapes for any hopeful recruits.
Page 8 of 23
In 1985 THE AMICUS was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the
International Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing
membership 3to 4 times. We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally
syndicated Financial Planner, Ms. Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major
fundraiser. More than 150 professionals attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden
Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong discussed financial planning and how all of the
professions needed to work together in order to be most effective for their clients. We attracted a
wide variety of professionals including; brokers, lawyers, accountants, realtors, tax specialists,
estate planners, bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has become evident that financial
planning was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us from Blue Ball National
Bank to help them develop a Financial Planning department within their bank.
In 1984 THE AMICUS had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President
of Citi Group (the largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to
help advise on the future of Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and the
investment industry at large. Mr. Weil was performing due diligence for the merger of American
Express and IDS (Investors Diversified Services). We were at that time a national leader in the
company in delivering Fee Based Financial Planning Services, which was a new concept in the
investment community and mainstream investors. That concept is now widely held by most
investment advisers.
Page 9 of 23
dismissed without any convictions, most without any trials, which according to law are false arrests and
false imprisonments. The MOVANT was a Federal Whistleblower in the United States v. International
Signal and Control, Plc., case of 1991.
This amicus provides a voice for the Movant as well as providing another perspective and opinion
that should benefit the courts; the parties; and the public-at-large.
amicus have a direct relevancy in the disposition of this case as it does in the Attorney General's
(Kathleen Kane) fight to restore integrity and equity to the Judicial System of Pennsylvania, which
affects all of the residents of the COMMONWEALTH. The
she is in a battle with the 'old boys' network' of Pennsylvania and the MOVANT has written extensively
about this same select group over the years beginning in 1998. In an interview with Brian Taff of WPVI
on February 16, 2016 the Attorney General is quoted as saying Everybody makes mistakes. I
knew there was a good old boy network, everyone does. I had no idea how deep and how
powerful that network actually ran. The fact that I took it on and I wasn't silent about it and
that I am determined to tear that down, I think that's what my legacy will show.
In a 1998 narrative the MOVANT wrote the following This story was perpetuated through a
gross miscarriage of justice: a tenure of malicious wrongdoing by both the law enforcement
community of Lancaster County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as well as
community leaders. A process that continues to obstruct Stan Caterbone's rights for justice.
It's mannerisms reach into the inner soul of political and judicial corruption. All in the name
of greed, and all in the honor of continuing the status quo of the "Good Ole Boy's" club of
Lancaster County. A process obsessed with keeping it's disclosure from escaping beyond the
confines of "Pandora's Box". It's a tenure of power that evolved from the days of this
country's earliest settlers, but an evolution that has somewhere strayed away from the
intent of our constitution; with total disregard for the law, in total disrespect for the
Page 10 of 23
Constitution, and void of many of our civil liberties. This atrocity, like the Lambert case,
would have made our founding forefathers revel in disgust and bellow in despair. In
fact, their spirits and energies probably are!
In 2009 Opednews.com printed the narrative in full and the MOVANT wishes this said court
to consider it's content in it's final deliberations in support of dismissing all prosecutions against
the Attorney General of Pennsylvania.
EXHIBITS.
Diary: Lancaster County, The CIA, and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control ,
http://www.opednews.com/populum/diarypagem.php?f=Lancaster-County-The-CIAby-Stan-Caterbone-091125-169.html
In addition the MOVANT wrote to the ATTORNEY GENERAL on November 12, 2015 and
stated the following Back in 1998 I had a meeting with an NSA (National Security
Agency, Ft. Meade, Md) operative in a parking lot of a former car dealer in York, PA. I
had just attended a job fair and he approached me as I was about to get into my car. He
introduced himself as being from the NSA and I questioned him about why they would
not leave me alone. His response was "It is not US (NSA) it's the Good Ole Boys". I also
have a huge problem with modified, stolen, and planted documents. We parted ways in
an amicable fashion.
The ATTORNEY GENERAL returned a letter the following day that stated Dear Mr.
Caterbone, Thank You for your correspondence to the Office of Attorney General, we
will keep your information in our files.
Page 11 of 23
knowledge
of
the
MOVANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the
MOVANT's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No. 0523059. The MOVANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings, however
this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls on the shoulders of all those in the
government that ignored the MOVANT'S pleas for help to resolve these issues dating back to the
days immediately following the meeting with International Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive
Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.
This information could explain the COINTELPRO attributes of my situation and persons
under oath of law must refer this to the U.S. Attorney's Office and provide me with relief.
I am currently a recipient of the following type(s) of Benefits from the Social Security
Administration for Long Term Disability Benefits for illnesses and symptoms relating to U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control as evidenced by my documentation and the fact that no medical reports
or physicians were reported in the entire application process and there was never a psychiatric
evaluation for the same said purposes.
have been since April of 2008 and was declared disabled in December of 2005, the same said
month that I reported that I became the victim of full-time synthetic telepathy, as well as other
related symptoms and illnesses.
Page 12 of 23
If the Court would consider the leqal circumstances surrounding my Whistleblowing activities and
the Federal False Claims Act filing of the Petitioner as it relates to the past 28 years and the
myriad of violations of the Lancaster County District Attorney. The Petitioner wil argue that it is
wholly unfair and unconstitutional not to grant the Petitioner In Forma Pauperis Status. The
Petitioner has filed ample evidence of a pattern and relentless cycle of earning and accumulating
capital and assets, as well building substantial worth through his business interests, only to have
it all extorted through an elaborate civil and criminal scheme to defruad.
Therefore any
attempt to subject the Petitioner to more court related fees is only a continuation of
that same said fraud.
Consideration should be given to Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District,
where the courts interpreted due process, as Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what due
process means. Furthermore, the United States District Courts in Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F
2d. 644) have concluded the following:
defendant being deprived of his due process rights. The focus of these claims are recorded in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 05-2288 and 06-4650. In
addition the Petioner is the MOVANT in the Lisa Michelle Lambrerrt Case and recently filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment, 04-2559, which was recently appealed to the Third Circuit Court
of Appeals.
The preceding cases have been preserved by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in
Page 13 of 23
The 29 False Arrests, which under Pennsylvania Law, constitute a conspiracy that may be
proved by circumstantial evidence that is by acts and circumstances sufficient to warrant an
inference that the unlawful combination has been in front of
charged. See Walcker v. North Wales Boro, 395 F. Supp. 2d. 219. In the same case the following
was supported: Arrestees allegations that the township (Conestoga) and its police officers were
acting in concert and conspiracy and with the purpose of violating arrestees constitutional rights
by subjecting him to unreasonable force, arrest, search, and malicious prosecution and the two
(2) or more officers acted together in throwing arrestee to the ground (April 5 th, 2006 and August
4th, 2006) and forcing him to take two (2) blood tests and holding him in custody. The preceding
pleaded civil conspiracy claims under Pennsylvania Law.
13. In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under Pennsylvania Law,
a plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree or combine with lawful intent to
do an unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act by unlawful means, with proof of malice
with intent to injure the person, his/her property and or business. In the case of United
States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple
conspiracies by the following: Governments, without committing variance between single
conspiracy charges in an indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at
continuing core conspiracy which attracts different members at different times and which
involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan. 1983 Civil
Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the
scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations
to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations
when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to
strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement and
protection from state and local government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241,
242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982,
1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes27 federal crimes and
8 state crimeswithin a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the case,
has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering.
Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in
prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business
gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that
allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages. When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone
under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the
Page 14 of 23
References
RICO Suave (http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/rico.asp) . Snopes.com: (21 December
2004). Retrieved on 2006-03-26. 1.
External links
RICO Act from Cornell University'sU. S. Code database
(http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_96.html) Detail of Tanya
Andersen's claim against Atlantic Records (http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2005/10/oregonriaa-victim-fights-back- sues.html) Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act Categories: Articles with
weasel words | United States federal legislation | Organized crime terminology
Page 15 of 23
EXHIBIT FOR
CONSIDERATION
with accompanying DVD Titled
KANE AMICUS DVD
Page 16 of 23
DVD EXHIBIT
3575
EDA 2016
FILE
- AMICUS
LIST BRIEF
Page
Page17
3 of 23
4
Wednesday
Friday December 23,
21, 2016
DVD EXHIBIT
3575
EDA 2016
FILE
- AMICUS
LIST BRIEF
Page
Page18
4 of 23
4
Wednesday
Friday December 23,
21, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
Page 19 of 23
In the article by By Rahul D. Manchanda, Esq. Dated Aug 22, 2016, The
Page 20 of 23
(2) Psychological warfare: The FBI and police used myriad "dirty tricks" to
undermine progressive movements. They planted false media stories and published
bogus leaflets and other publications in the name of targeted groups. They forged
correspondence, sent anonymous letters, and made anonymous telephone calls. They
spread misinformation about meetings and events, set up pseudo movement groups run
by government agents, and manipulated or strong armed parents, employers, landlords,
school officials and others to cause trouble for activists. They used bad jacketing to
create suspicion about targeted activists, sometimes with lethal consequences;
(3) Harassment via the legal system: The FBI and police abused the legal system to
harass dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave
perjured testimony and presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and
wrongful imprisonment. They discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government
regulations and used conspicuous surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand
jury subpoenas in an effort to intimidate activists and silence their supporters;
(4) Illegal force: The FBI conspired with local police departments to threaten
dissidents; to conduct illegal break ins in order to search dissident homes; and to
commit vandalism, assaults, beatings and assassinations. The object was to frighten or
eliminate dissidents and disrupt their movements.
Unfortunately I cannot leave my home with being stalked, harassed and threatened by
neighbors, passerby's, etc., On a daily basis I have someone, or groups of people entering my
home, vandalizing, stealing, and poisoning my food. To make matters worse, this protocol
follows me in federal, state, and local courthouses. Every electronic device that I have and use
is compromised and hacked in some fashion. Every online account is the same, and every
financial account, including checking accounts, vendor accounts, utilities, etc., contains some
form of fraud and theft by deception costing me money.
Well, the following links are my supporting evidence, and NOW I WISH YOU AND YOUR
FAMILY A VERY HAPPY AND MERRY CHRISTMAS. DON'T EVER TAKE YOUR FREEDOM FOR
GRANTED, SIR! I WISH I HAD THE FREEDOM YOU AND YOUR FAMILY ENJOYS.
STAN J. CATERBONE and CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION Monday November 14, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/331068312/Stan-J-Caterbone-andConflicts-With-the-Trump-Administration-Monday-November-14-2016
Page 21 of 23
U.S. SUPREME COURT DOCKET, U.S. SUPREME COURT PEITIION, AND Letter
REQUEST FOR COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to
President Obama, November 15, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/331393349/Supreme-Court-of-theUnited-States-Case-No-16-8822-DOCKET-and-COMMUTATION-LETTER-toOBAMA-Re-CATERBONE-v-Allison-Hallet-Re-Lisa-Lambert-Habeus-Nove
Respectfully,
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed,
and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct
and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to
Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation
and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and
expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks
on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and
some communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced
Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How
long can Lancaster County and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the
ISC Scandel (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?
Page 22 of 23
PROOF
SERVICE
IN SUPPORT OF QUASHING
THEOF
CHARGES
IN MONTGOMERY COURT CASE NO. CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
I hereby certify that on or about December 23, 2016 SERVICE VIA ELECTRONIC
MAIL WAS SENT TO THE FOLLOWING:
Lock, Joshua D.
Law Firm: Goldberg Katzman, P.C.
Address: Goldberg Katzman PC
4250 Crums Mill Rd Ste 301
Harrisburg, PA 17112-2889
Phone No: (717) 234-4161
Served: Kevin R. Steele
Service Method: Email
Email: ksteele@montcopa.org
Service Date: July 13, 2016
Address:
Phone: 610-278-3098
Representing: Appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Served: Robert Martin Falin
Service Method: Email
Email: rfalin@montcopa.org
Service Date: July 13, 2016
Address:
Phone: 610-278-3102
Representing: Appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Served: Robert Martin Falin
Service Method: eService
Email: rfalin@montcopa.org
Service Date:July 13, 2016
Address: Montgomery County Courthouse
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
Phone: 610-278-3104
Representing: Appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Page 23 of 23
4:36 P.M.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
Appellant
CASE INFORMATION
Initiating Document:
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Decided/Active
Awaiting Remittal
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Criminal
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Perjury
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
No
No
Lock, Joshua D.
Goldberg Katzman, P.C.
Goldberg Katzman PC
4250 Crums Mill Rd Ste 301
Harrisburg, PA 17112-2889
(717) 234-4161
Phone No:
Amicus
Pro Se:
Fax No:
Caterbone, Stanley J.
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Yes
Stanley J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
Neither the Appellate Courts nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability
for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on the docket sheets.
4:36 P.M.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
No
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Steele, Kevin R.
Montgomery County District Attorney's Office
PO Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
(610) 278-3098
Fax No:
Phone No:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
11/22/2016
Notice of Appeal
85.50 11/30/2016
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
2016-SPR-E-002064
Court Below:
County:
Order Appealed From:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Judge
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Filed Date
Content Description
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
Caterbone, Stanley J.
Neither the Appellate Courts nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability
for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on the docket sheets.
85.50
4:36 P.M.
Filed Date
December 9, 2016
Other
Participant Type
Filed By
Eldridge, Lisa A.
Document Name: Per TC Judge's chambers - Extension of time granted through 1/6/17 to file 1925(b) statement
Comment: Opinion will be filed by 3/6/17.
December 16, 2016
Order
Per Curiam
DISPOSITION INFORMATION
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Yes
Disposition Comment:
Dispositional Filing:
Filed Date:
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
Per Curiam
December 22, 2016
Neither the Appellate Courts nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability
for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on the docket sheets.
4:37 P.M.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
Appellant
CASE INFORMATION
Initiating Document:
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Active
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Criminal
Case Type(s):
Perjury
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
No
No
Lock, Joshua D.
Goldberg Katzman, P.C.
Goldberg Katzman PC
4250 Crums Mill Rd Ste 301
Harrisburg, PA 17112-2889
(717) 234-4161
Phone No:
Appellee
Pro Se:
Fax No:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
No
Steele, Kevin R.
Montgomery County District Attorney's Office
PO Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
(610) 278-3098
Fax No:
Falin, Robert Martin
Montgomery County District Attorney's Office
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404
(610) 278-3102
Fax No: (610) 278-3841
Neither the Appellate Courts nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability
for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on the docket sheets.
4:37 P.M.
Fee Dt
Fee Name
11/22/2016
Notice of Appeal
85.50 11/30/2016
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
2016-SPR-E-002063
Court Below:
County:
Order Appealed From:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Judge
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Filed Date
Content Description
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
December 9, 2016
Other
Eldridge, Lisa A.
Document Name: Per TC Judge's chambers - Extension granted throught 1/6/17 to file 1925(b) statement.
Comment: Opinion will be filed by 3/6/17.
December 16, 2016
Neither the Appellate Courts nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability
for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on the docket sheets.
85.50
P
usps.com
062S0000000309
Click-N-Ship
12/23/2016
0006
C047
STAN CATERBONE
AMG
1250 FREMONT ST
LANCASTER PA 17603-6812
PHILADELPHIA PA 19106-3623
SHIP PROTHONOTARY
TO: PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT
530 WALNUT ST
STE 315
USPS TRACKING #
Instructions
USPS TRACKING # :
From:
To:
393774810
12/23/2016
12/23/2016
$6.45
$6.45
12/28/2016
STAN CATERBONE
AMG
1250 FREMONT ST
LANCASTER PA 17603-6812
PROTHONOTARY
PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT
530 WALNUT ST
STE 315
PHILADELPHIA PA 19106-3623
* Retail Pricing Priority Mail rates apply. There is no fee for USPS Tracking service
on Priority Mail service with use of this electronic rate shipping label. Refunds for
unused postage paid labels can be requested online 30 days from the print date.
Thank you for shipping with the United States Postal Service!
Check the status of your shipment on the USPS Tracking page at usps.com
Shipment Confirmation
Acceptance Notice
A. Mailer Action
Note To Mailer:
12/23/16
Shipment Date:_______________________________
Shipped From:
STAN CATERBONE
AMG
1250 FREMONT ST
LANCASTER PA 17603-6812
Type of Mail
Volume
Priority Mail
International Mail*
Other
0
Total Volume
*Start time for products with service guarantees will begin when mail arrives at the local Post Office
and items receive individual processing and acceptance scans.
B. USPS Action
USPS EMPLOYEE: Please scan upon pickup or receipt of mail. Leave form with customer or in customer's mail receptacle.
Employee verifies the package volume count on the Package Pickup Carrier Manifest.
- If the volume on the manifest matches the volume being collected from the customer, the employee should make the 1:YES selection
by pressing the number 1 on the keypad of the handheld scanner, or on the keyboard of the POS ONE terminal.
- If the volume on the manifest does not match the volume being collected from the customer, the employee should make the 2:NO
selection. The mail should still be collected and dispatched as normal.
USPS SCAN