STAN CATERBONE NAMED AMICUS FOR KATHLEEN KANE Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 3575 EDA 2016 FRIDAY JANUARY 20, 2017

4:36 P.M.
Appeal Docket Sheet
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Docket Number: 3575 EDA 2016

Page 1 of 3
January 20, 2017
CAPTION
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
Appellant
CASE INFORMATION
Initiating Document:
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Active
Case Processing Status:
November 30, 2016
Awaiting Original Record
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Criminal
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Perjury
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
3576 EDA 2016

Related
Same Case - Diff Docket
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type: Original Record Received
Next Event Due Date: January 23, 2017

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
Kane, Kathleen Granahan
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
No
No
Lock, Joshua D.
Goldberg Katzman, P.C.
Goldberg Katzman PC
4250 Crums Mill Rd Ste 301
Harrisburg, PA 17112-2889
(717) 234-4161
Phone No:
Amicus
Pro Se:
Fax No:
Caterbone, Stanley J.
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Yes
Stanley J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
the Appellate Courts nor the Administrative

Office
3575 EDA 2016 DOCKETNeither
REPORT
Page 1 of
37of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability
Friday January 20, 2017
for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on the docket sheets.
4:36 P.M.
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 3
January 20, 2017
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellee
Pro Se:
No
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Steele, Kevin R.
Montgomery County District Attorney's Office
PO Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
(610) 278-3098
Fax No:
Phone No:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Falin, Robert Martin

P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404
(610) 278-3102
Fax No: (610) 278-3841
Phone No:
FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
Fee Amt Receipt Dt
11/22/2016
Notice of Appeal
85.50 11/30/2016
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
2016-SPR-E-002063
85.50
AGENCY/TRIAL COURT INFORMATION
Court Below:
County:
Order Appealed From:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):
Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas

Montgomery
Division:
October 24, 2016
Judicial District:
November 30, 2016
Notice of Appeal Filed:
Judgment of Sentence
T6863802
T7090322
Lower Ct Docket No(s):
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Judge
Montgomery County Criminal Division

38
November 22, 2016
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ORIGINAL RECORD CONTENT
Original Record Item
Filed Date
Content Description
Date of Remand of Record:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Docket Entry / Representing
November 30, 2016
Notice of Appeal Docketed
November 30, 2016
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
Docketing Statement Exited (Criminal)


Office
REPORT
Page 2 of
4:36 P.M.
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 3
January 20, 2017
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
December 9, 2016
Other
Participant Type
Filed By
Eldridge, Lisa A.
Document Name: Per TC Judge's chambers - Extension granted throught 1/6/17 to file 1925(b) statement.
Comment: Opinion will be filed by 3/6/17.
December 16, 2016
Docketing Statement Received (Criminal)

Appellant
Application for Leave to File Amicus Brief

Appellant
Comment: Stan J. Caterbone, Advanced Media Group
December 28, 2016
January 19, 2017
Order
Per Curiam
Comment: Upon consideration of the Petitioner's "Request The Courtesy Of The Court To Appear Pro Se And To
File An Amicus Curaie [sic] Brief In Support Of The Following," filed by "Stan J. Caterbone," the
petitioner shall not be permitted to present oral argument.

Office
REPORT
Page 3 of
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:
:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :
v.

Lower Court Docket CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
KATHLEEN KANE
EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT OF THE AMICUS BRIEF

DVD TITLED 16-cv-4014 AMENDED COMPLAINT DVD
Rule 531. Participation by Amicus Curiae.
(a) Briefs.Anyone interested in the questions involved in any matter pending in an appellate court,
excluding Petitions for Allowance of Appeal, although not a party, may, without applying for leave to
do so, file a brief amicus curiae in regard to those questions.
(1) Unless otherwise ordered by the court, any amicus curiae shall file and serve its brief in the
manner and number required and within the time allowed by these rules with respect to the party
whose position as to affirm and or reversal the amicus brief will support, or with respect to the
appellant, if the amicus brief does not support the position of any party.
(2) In an appeal proceeding under Rules 2154(b), 2185(c) and 2187(b), any amicus curiae shall file
and serve its brief within the time allowed by these rules for service of the advance text of the brief
by the party whose position as to affirm and or reversal the amicus brief will support or, if the amicus
brief does not support the position of any party, within the time allowed by these rules for service of
the advance text by the appellant. Alternatively, the amicus curiae may, but is not required to, serve
an advance text and then file and serve a definitive copy of its brief. If the amicus curiae chooses to
serve an advance copy and then file and serve a definitive copy, its deadlines for each are the same
as for the party whose position as to affirm and or reversal the amicus brief supports or, if the
3575 EDA 2016 - AMICUS EXHIBIT
Page 1 of 4
Wednesday January 18, 2017
amicus brief does not support the position of any party, as for the appellant.
(b) Oral argument.Oral argument may be presented by amicus curiae only as the appellate court
may direct. Requests for leave to present oral argument shall be by application and will be granted
only for extraordinary reasons.
Official Note
Where the amicus cannot comply with the requirements of this rule because of ignorance of the
pendency of the question, relief may be sought under Rule 105(b). The last eight words of the rule
are new. In Piccirilli Bros. v. Lewis, 282 Pa. 328, 336, 127 Atl. 832, 835 (1925) the court noted the
applicability of this rule to public officers who are represented by official counsel with an adverse
position.
The 2011 amendment to the rule clarified when those filing amicus curiae briefs should serve and file
their briefs when the appellant has chosen or the parties have been directed to proceed under the
rules related to large records (Rule 2154(b)), advance text (Rule 2187(b)) and definitive copies (Rule
2185(c)). Under those rules, the appellant may defer preparation of the reproduced record until after
the briefs have been served. The parties serve on one another (but do not file) advance texts of their
briefs within the times required by Rule 2187. At the time they file their advance texts, each party
includes certified record designations for inclusion in the reproduced record. The appellant must then
prepare and file the reproduced record within 21 days of service of the appellees advance text (Rule
2186(a)(2)). Within 14 days of the filing of the reproduced record, each party that served a brief in
advance text may file and serve definitive copies of their briefs. The definitive copy must include
references to the pages of the reproduced record, but it may not otherwise include changes from the
advance text other than correction of typographical errors. Those filing amicus curiae briefs may
choose to serve an advance text and then file and serve definitive copies according to the procedure
required of the parties or they may choose to file a definitive brief without citations to the reproduced
record.
January 18, 2017
Respectfully,
____________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-528-2200
Page 2 of 4
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed,
and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct
and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to
Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation
and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and
expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks
on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and
some communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced
Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How
long can Lancaster County and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the
ISC Scandel (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?
ACTIVE COURT CASES

1. J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re
ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
2. U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
3. U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
4. U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
5. U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1325 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR
EMERGENCY RELIEF; Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
6. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
7. Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen
Kane
8. Superior Court of Pennsylvania Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for
Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219
Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
9. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
10. U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Page 3 of 4
Case No. 16-10157
I hereby certify that on or about January 18, 2017 SERVICE VIA USPS REGULAR OR
PRIORITY MAIL WAS SENT TO THE FOLLOWING:
Lock, Joshua D.
Law Firm: Goldberg Katzman, P.C.
Address: Goldberg Katzman PC
Phone No: (717) 234-4161
Served: Kevin R. Steele
Service Method: Email
Email: ksteele@montcopa.org
Service Date: July 13, 2016
Address:
Phone: 610-278-3098
Representing: Appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
DATE: JANUARY 18, 2017

____________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-528-2200
Page 4 of 4
IN SUPPORT OF QUASHING THE CHARGES IN MONTGOMERY COURT CASE NO. CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:
:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :
v.

Lower Court Docket CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
KATHLEEN KANE
REQUEST THE COURTESY OF THE COURT TO APPEAR PRO SE AND TO FILE

AN AMICUS CURAIE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE FOLLOWING
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID COURT:
AND NOW comes before the said court Stanley J. Caterbone, appearing Pro Se, and Advanced
Media Group, request for Appearance to file an Amicus in the above captioned case to support the
following:
1. Quashing the charges in case Montgomery Court Case No.
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
2. In support of any other relief this Court deems just and proper.
The following Amicus should provide this Court with the proper jurisdiction for legal standing
to consider this Amicus according to Rule 531 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Procedure.
Rule 531. Participation by Amicus Curiae.

(a) Briefs.Anyone interested in the questions involved in any matter pending in an appellate court,
excluding Petitions for Allowance of Appeal, although not a party, may, without applying for leave to
do so, file a brief amicus curiae in regard to those questions.
(1) Unless otherwise ordered by the court, any amicus curiae shall file and serve its brief in the
manner and number required and within the time allowed by these rules with respect to the party
whose position as to affirm and or reversal the amicus brief will support, or with respect to the
appellant, if the amicus brief does not support the position of any party.
3575 EDA 2016 - AMICUS BRIEF
Page 1 of 23
Friday December 23, 2016
(2) In an appeal proceeding under Rules 2154(b), 2185(c) and 2187(b), any amicus curiae shall file
and serve its brief within the time allowed by these rules for service of the advance text of the brief
by the party whose position as to affirm and or reversal the amicus brief will support or, if the amicus
brief does not support the position of any party, within the time allowed by these rules for service of
the advance text by the appellant. Alternatively, the amicus curiae may, but is not required to, serve
an advance text and then file and serve a definitive copy of its brief. If the amicus curiae chooses to
serve an advance copy and then file and serve a definitive copy, its deadlines for each are the same
as for the party whose position as to affirm and or reversal the amicus brief supports or, if the
amicus brief does not support the position of any party, as for the appellant.
(b) Oral argument.Oral argument may be presented by amicus curiae only as the appellate court
may direct. Requests for leave to present oral argument shall be by application and will be granted
only for extraordinary reasons.
Official Note
Where the amicus cannot comply with the requirements of this rule because of ignorance of the
pendency of the question, relief may be sought under Rule 105(b). The last eight words of the rule
are new. In Piccirilli Bros. v. Lewis, 282 Pa. 328, 336, 127 Atl. 832, 835 (1925) the court noted the
applicability of this rule to public officers who are represented by official counsel with an adverse
position.
The 2011 amendment to the rule clarified when those filing amicus curiae briefs should serve and file
their briefs when the appellant has chosen or the parties have been directed to proceed under the
rules related to large records (Rule 2154(b)), advance text (Rule 2187(b)) and definitive copies (Rule
2185(c)). Under those rules, the appellant may defer preparation of the reproduced record until after
the briefs have been served. The parties serve on one another (but do not file) advance texts of their
briefs within the times required by Rule 2187. At the time they file their advance texts, each party
includes certified record designations for inclusion in the reproduced record. The appellant must then
prepare and file the reproduced record within 21 days of service of the appellees advance text (Rule
2186(a)(2)). Within 14 days of the filing of the reproduced record, each party that served a brief in
advance text may file and serve definitive copies of their briefs. The definitive copy must include
references to the pages of the reproduced record, but it may not otherwise include changes from the
advance text other than correction of typographical errors. Those filing amicus curiae briefs may
choose to serve an advance text and then file and serve definitive copies according to the procedure
required of the parties or they may choose to file a definitive brief without citations to the reproduced
record.
Page 2 of 23
December 23, 2016

Respectfully,
____________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-528-2200
ACTIVE COURT CASES

3. J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re
ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
4. U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
5. U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
6. U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
7. U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1325 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR
EMERGENCY RELIEF; Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
8. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
9. Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen
Kane
10. Superior Court of Pennsylvania Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for
Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219
Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
11. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
12. U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Page 3 of 23
Case No. 16-10157
Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group Biography

Present - Advanced Media Group, President, Owner, and Founder.
In 1987 AMICUS became a federal whistleblower for the case of local defense contractor
International Signal and Control, or ISC. ISC was a black ops program for the NSA and CIA that
was convicted in 1992 for an elaborate scheme to arm Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries
with a broad array of weapons, most notably cluster bombs. It was the third larges fraud in U.S.
History at that time. I have been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of
electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005. I had also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005
the U.S. Sponsored Mind Control turned into an all-out assault of mental telepathy; synthetic
telepathy; hacking of all electronic devices; vandilism and thefts of personal property, extortions,
intellectual property violations, obstruction of justice; violations of due process; thefts and
modifications of court documents; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy
devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted
victim. This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the
federal action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv2288. This assault began after the handlers remotely trained/sychronized Stan J. Caterbone with
mental telepathy. The main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that
THE AMICUS is connected 24/7 with the same person who declares telepathically she is a known
celebrity. Over the course of 10 years THE AMICUS has been telepathic with at least 20 known
persons and have spent 10 years trying to validate and confirm their identities without success.
Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and
the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment and act on the numerous formal complaints that are
filed in their respective offices. Most complaints are focused on the routine victimization's of a
targeted individual including but not limited to stalking, harassment, threats, vandalism, thefts,
extortion, burglaries, false imprisonments, fabricated mental health warrants or involuntary
commitments, pain and torture to the body, and most often the cause of obstruction of justice is
the computer hacking.
THE AMICUS has a very sophisticated and authentic library of evidence of the use of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control technologies on my father and brother that dates back to the 1940's
while my father was in the U.S. Navy after he graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in
Florida, including an affidavit motorized and authenticated by my father in 1996. My brother
served in the U.S. Air force and was victim to LSD experiments of the infamous MKULTRA program
in the late 1960's.
In 2016 THE AMICUS was the AMICUS for Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane in the
Pennsylvania Superior Court Case No. 1164 EDA 2016 in the COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
v. Kane which included perjury charges during the alleged leaking of grand jury information.
Kathleen Kane took on the Good Old Boy network regarding judicial reform in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in an effort to rid the state of the long standing public corruption
ring that was evident from local law enforcement to Supreme Court Justices, and everyone in
between.
In 2015 THE AMICUS filed an amicus curie on behalf of Lisa Michelle Lambert who was
convicted in 1992 of the murder of Laurie Show, both of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. THE AMICUS
currently am in litigation in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals and in February of 2016 Lisa
Michelle Lambert published her book titled Corruption in Lancaster County My Story, which is
available in bookstores and on Amazon.com. THE AMICUS is in frequent contact with her coauthor, Dave Brown of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Page 4 of 23
In 2009 THE AMICUS Proposed an ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS
HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster,
Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work
of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these
horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to individuals who are being
harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep
individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency
devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons. THE AMICUS again
reintroduced the bill to the Pennsylvania General Assembly in 2015 and frequented the
Pennsylvania Capitol trying to find support and a sponsor; which THE AMICUS still does to this
day.
In 2006 THE AMICUS began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is
listed as "FULT" on the NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group,
Ltd., a full service financial firm, Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the
strategic vision for his company and the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public
offering efforts in dealing with Fulton Financial. THE AMICUS has been in recent discussions with
the Fulton Financial Board of Directors with regards to various complaints dealing with such issues
as the Resource Bank acquisition and the subprime failures. THE AMICUS believes that Fulton
Financial needs management to become more aggressive in it's strategic planning and the
performance it expects from it's management team in order to increase shareholder value.
Expanding the footprint of the regional bank has not yielded an increase to the bottom line that is
consistent with the expectations of shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local banking
institutions acquired by larger regional banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton Financial will
see in it's local marketplace as well as in it's regional footprint.
In 2005 THE AMICUS, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in
current litigation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the
United States Third District Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania
Superior Court, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. These litigations include violations of intellectual property rights,
anti-trust violations, and interference of contracts relating to several business interests. Central to
this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG
Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal
Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion
Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates
back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was solicited by ISC executives for
professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of RICO Civil Complaint in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288.
In 2005 Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn for their attempts to withhold the
Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center & Marriot.
We also proposed an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel Brunswick and
Lancaster Square to all of the major stakeholders. The Lancaster County Convention Center is
finally under construction with a March 2009 Opening date.
In 2005 THE AMICUS was selected to attend the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City
after submission of an essay with and application. THE AMICUS received the invitation from
Bruce R. Lindsey, Chief Executive Officer of the William J. Clinton Foundation.
In 2005 THE AMICUS began our philanthropic endeavors by spending our energies and working
with such organizations as; ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org, The Clinton Global
Initiative, Lancaster Convention Center Authority, Lancaster Chamber of Commerce, Toms Project
Hope, People to People International, GlobalWarming.org, Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide
Page 5 of 23
Hotline, Schreiber Pediatric Center, and numerous others.

In 2004 THE AMICUS embarked on our past endeavors in the music and entertainment
industries with an emphasis on assisting for the fair and equitable distribution of artists rights and
royalties in the fight against electronic piracy. We have attempted to assist in developing new
business models to address the convergence of physical and electronic mediums; as it displaces
royalties and revenues for those creating, promoting, and delivering a range of entertainment
content via wireless networks.
In 2000 to 2002 THE AMICUS developed an array of marketing and communication tools for
wholesalers of the AIM Investment Group and managed several communication programs for
several of the company wholesalers throughout the United States and Costa Rica. We also began
a Day Trading project that lasted until 2004 with success.
In 1999 THE AMICUS developed a comprehensive business plan to develop the former Sprecher
Brewery, known as the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This plan
was developed in conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the
Revitalization of Downtown Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the
former Watt & Shand building.
In 1999 THE AMICUS contributed to the debate, research, and implementation of strategies to
counter the effects of the global Y2K threat to the worlds computer technologies. THE AMICUS
attended the U.S. Sponsored Y2K symposium and Conference in Washington, D.C. hosted by the
Senate Y2K Subcommittee and Senator William Bennett.
In 1998 THE AMICUS had began to administer the charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a nonprofit organization promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention.
We had provided funding for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster
(The 24/7 Suicide Prevention Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable
organizations and faith based charities. The video "Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to
schools, non profit organizations, faith based initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational
support for the prevention of suicide and to bring awareness to mental illness problems.
In 1996 THE AMICUS had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the time that
THE AMICUS was controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., THE AMICUS was retained by Gallo
Rosso Restaurant and Bar to computerized their accounting and records management from top to
bottom. THE AMICUS had also provided consulting for the computerization of accounting and
payroll for Lancaster Container, Inc., of Washington Boro. THE AMICUS was retained to evaluate
and develop an action plan to migrate the Informations Technologies of the Jay Group, formally of
Ronks, PA, now relocated to a new $26 Million Dollar headquarters located in West Hempfield
Township of Lancaster County. The Jay Group had been using IBM mainframe technologies hosted
by the AS 400 computer and server. THE AMICUS was consulting on the merits of migrating to a
PC based real time networking system throughout the entire organization. Currently the Jay Group
employees some 500 employees with revenues in excess of $50 Million Dollars per year.
In 1993 THE AMICUS was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was
responsible for saving the company from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several
unpaid contracts, the company was facing extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding
insurance company. We were responsible for implementing computerized accounting, accounting
and contract policies and procedures, human resource policies and procedures, marketing
strategies, performance measurement reporting, and negotiate for the payment of unpaid
contracts. The bonding company was especially problematic, since it was the lifeline to continue
work and bidding for public contracts. The Bank of Lancaster County demanded a complete
accounting of the operations in order to stave off a default on the notes and loans it was holding.
We essentially revamped the entire operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in
profits of 3 to 4 times its previous years, and record revenues.
Page 6 of 23
In 1991 THE AMICUS was elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador
Program, which was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was
founded to To give specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together
and effectively communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-toface scientific, technical, and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961, under
President John F. Kennedy, the State Department established a non-profit private foundation to
administer the program. We were scheduled to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to
discuss printing and publishing technologies with scientists and technicians around the world.
In 1990 THE AMICUS had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the governments
technology think tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). THE AMICUS coauthored the article Escaping the Unix Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was published in
the magazine DISC, then one of the leading publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most
all call centers deploy that technology whenever you call an 800 number, and voice recognition is
prevalent in all types of applications involving telecommunications.
In 1989 THE AMICUS had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S.
domestic companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with
commercial companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign companies.
THE AMICUS performed services and contracts for the Department of Defense, NASA, National
Institution of Standards & Technology (NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence
Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft, AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, and
a host of others. THE AMICUS also was working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was
developing various interactive mapping technologies, which is now a major asset of Map Quest.
Map Quest is the premier provider of mapping software and applications for the internet and is
often used in delivering maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had arranged for
High Industries to sell American Helix, the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly. We
had brokered a deal and the executives from Donnellys Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to
discuss the deal and perform due diligence of the manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield
Industrial Park.
In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York and Tony Bongiovi retained me as executive
producer of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a
digital format; the first of its kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and
created the concept for the Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the
copyright and marketing formula of the DOLBY technology trademark.
We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and
commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording
industry featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of
Philadelphia was the lead patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station
Studios was the brainchild of Tony Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown
when he was 15. Tony and Power Station Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the
country, and were responsible for developing Bon Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients
included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper, Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones,
Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station Studios had produced the original
Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture. It was released for distribution and was
the number one Sound Track recording of its time.
Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We
had developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the
Digital Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the
commercialization of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry
simultaneously with the release of the Digital Movie.
Page 7 of 23
THE AMICUS also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark
logo for the technology, similar to the DOLBY sound systems trademark. The acronyms stand for
the Power Station Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies
on a portable medium, a compact disc.
In 1987 THE AMICUS had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was
funded by a major banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from
$3 to $100 million dollars. Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received
solicitations from developers across the country. We were also very attractive to companies that
wanted to raise capital that include both debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could
raise equity funding through private placements, and debt funding through FMG Mortgage
Banking. We were retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood, California to secure financing of
their postproduction Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North Carolina. We had secured
refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the midst of replacing
the current loan that was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and discussions
with Drew Anton of the Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We were
quickly seeking commitments for real estate deals from New York to California. We also had a
number of other prominent local developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen
Kugal, High Industries, and the Marty Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt.
30 Outlets). We were constantly told that our financing packages were more competitive than
local institutions.
In 1986 THE AMICUS had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial
services organization comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had
developed a stock purchase program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership
in the new firm. FMG had financial planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys,
realtors, liability insurance services, tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of our
corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we had 24 people on staff, had approximately
12 offices in Pennsylvania, and
several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and
our advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees
from the other professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at
about $3 to $4 million.
In 1985 THE AMICUS developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent
Camp for the Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams
scouting departments. (See Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps
were dependant on the team scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had
developed a strategy of video taping the camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the
teams, to all of the scouting departments for teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My
brother was signed at that camp by the Ottawa Roughriders of the CFL, and went on to be a
leading receiver while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues most prominent quarterbacks. My brother
also played 2 years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino was starting quarterback. We were
a Certified Agent for the National Football League Players Association. Gene Upshaw, the President
of the NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp, while we were at a Conference for
agents of the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article about our camp and associated it
with other camps that were questionable about their practices. Actually, that was the very reason
for our camp. We had attended many other camps around the country that were not very well
organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants, with one player coming
from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a professional
production company filming the entire camp, while THE AMICUS did the editing and produced the
video. The well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the
Dallas Cowboys, had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him
and said he looked forward to reviewing the tapes for any hopeful recruits.
Page 8 of 23
In 1985 THE AMICUS was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the
International Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing
membership 3to 4 times. We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally
syndicated Financial Planner, Ms. Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major
fundraiser. More than 150 professionals attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden
Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong discussed financial planning and how all of the
professions needed to work together in order to be most effective for their clients. We attracted a
wide variety of professionals including; brokers, lawyers, accountants, realtors, tax specialists,
estate planners, bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has become evident that financial
planning was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us from Blue Ball National
Bank to help them develop a Financial Planning department within their bank.
In 1984 THE AMICUS had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President
of Citi Group (the largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to
help advise on the future of Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and the
investment industry at large. Mr. Weil was performing due diligence for the merger of American
Express and IDS (Investors Diversified Services). We were at that time a national leader in the
company in delivering Fee Based Financial Planning Services, which was a new concept in the
investment community and mainstream investors. That concept is now widely held by most
investment advisers.
Page 9 of 23
AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF KATHLEEN KANE'S (ATTORNEY GENERAL) MOTION

TO DISMISS CHARGES BASED ON SELECTIVE AND VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID COURT:
AND NOW comes before the said court Stanley J. Caterbone, appearing Pro Se, and Advanced
Media Group, as Movant, to file an Amicus in the above captioned case.
The Movant has an interest in this case as also being a victim of SELECTIVE AND VINDICTIVE
PROSECUTION by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Lancaster County District Attorney's
Office dating back to the myriad of prosecutions by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 1987, 2005,
and 2006 while a resident of the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Most of which have been
dismissed without any convictions, most without any trials, which according to law are false arrests and
false imprisonments. The MOVANT was a Federal Whistleblower in the United States v. International
Signal and Control, Plc., case of 1991.
This amicus provides a voice for the Movant as well as providing another perspective and opinion
that should benefit the courts; the parties; and the public-at-large.
The matters presented in this
amicus have a direct relevancy in the disposition of this case as it does in the Attorney General's
(Kathleen Kane) fight to restore integrity and equity to the Judicial System of Pennsylvania, which
affects all of the residents of the COMMONWEALTH. The
Attorney General has been quoted as saying
she is in a battle with the 'old boys' network' of Pennsylvania and the MOVANT has written extensively
about this same select group over the years beginning in 1998. In an interview with Brian Taff of WPVI
on February 16, 2016 the Attorney General is quoted as saying Everybody makes mistakes. I
knew there was a good old boy network, everyone does. I had no idea how deep and how
powerful that network actually ran. The fact that I took it on and I wasn't silent about it and
that I am determined to tear that down, I think that's what my legacy will show.
In a 1998 narrative the MOVANT wrote the following This story was perpetuated through a
gross miscarriage of justice: a tenure of malicious wrongdoing by both the law enforcement
community of Lancaster County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as well as
community leaders. A process that continues to obstruct Stan Caterbone's rights for justice.
It's mannerisms reach into the inner soul of political and judicial corruption. All in the name
of greed, and all in the honor of continuing the status quo of the "Good Ole Boy's" club of
Lancaster County. A process obsessed with keeping it's disclosure from escaping beyond the
confines of "Pandora's Box". It's a tenure of power that evolved from the days of this
country's earliest settlers, but an evolution that has somewhere strayed away from the
intent of our constitution; with total disregard for the law, in total disrespect for the
Page 10 of 23
Constitution, and void of many of our civil liberties. This atrocity, like the Lambert case,
would have made our founding forefathers revel in disgust and bellow in despair. In
fact, their spirits and energies probably are!
In 2009 Opednews.com printed the narrative in full and the MOVANT wishes this said court
to consider it's content in it's final deliberations in support of dismissing all prosecutions against
the Attorney General of Pennsylvania.
In addition attached are supporting documents to
advanced the credibility and integrity of the MOVANT.
These documents are attached as
EXHIBITS.
Diary: Lancaster County, The CIA, and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control ,
http://www.opednews.com/populum/diarypagem.php?f=Lancaster-County-The-CIAby-Stan-Caterbone-091125-169.html
In addition the MOVANT wrote to the ATTORNEY GENERAL on November 12, 2015 and
stated the following Back in 1998 I had a meeting with an NSA (National Security
Agency, Ft. Meade, Md) operative in a parking lot of a former car dealer in York, PA. I
had just attended a job fair and he approached me as I was about to get into my car. He
introduced himself as being from the NSA and I questioned him about why they would
not leave me alone. His response was "It is not US (NSA) it's the Good Ole Boys". I also
have a huge problem with modified, stolen, and planted documents. We parted ways in
an amicable fashion.
The ATTORNEY GENERAL returned a letter the following day that stated Dear Mr.
Caterbone, Thank You for your correspondence to the Office of Attorney General, we
will keep your information in our files.
Page 11 of 23
HISTORY AND BACKGROUND OF MOVANT AND THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM

In 2015 the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas began a campaign of DENYING In
Forma Pauperis Applications, and demanding that current cases with legitimate In Forma Pauperis
Status be DENIED in an effort to again subvert the laws of due process and obstruction of justice.
The Superior Court had followed, as did the U.S. District Court in this case by Judge Diamond.
This was an outright effort to extort monies from the MOVANT and in the long term make service
of the complaints cost prohibitive due to the fact that Pro Se Litigants with In Forma Pauperis
Status, by law, receive free service from the Lancaster County Sheriffs and the U.S. Marshalls.
This tactic, in the end, would have effectively dismissed all legitimate claims of the MOVANT. The
Judges used the excuse of monies in bank accounts as the rationale for the illegal tactic, however,
attached are 5 cases of GRANTED In Forma Pauperis applications in both the Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas, the Pennsylvania Superior Court, and the United States District Court
with financial affidavits containing amounts of monies in bank accounts exceeding $10,000.00, all
prior to 2015.
This exhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court understand the
complexity of the MOVANT'S obligation to provide the Court with the evidence and insight to
support the MOVANT'S claims and statements. These documents will also provide the Court with
sufficient
knowledge
of
the
MOVANT'S
claim
of
the
value
of
the
MOVANT's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No. 0523059. The MOVANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings, however
this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls on the shoulders of all those in the
government that ignored the MOVANT'S pleas for help to resolve these issues dating back to the
days immediately following the meeting with International Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive
Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.
This information could explain the COINTELPRO attributes of my situation and persons
under oath of law must refer this to the U.S. Attorney's Office and provide me with relief.
I am currently a recipient of the following type(s) of Benefits from the Social Security
Administration for Long Term Disability Benefits for illnesses and symptoms relating to U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control as evidenced by my documentation and the fact that no medical reports
or physicians were reported in the entire application process and there was never a psychiatric
evaluation for the same said purposes.
I am receiving a net monthly benefit of $1330.00 and
have been since April of 2008 and was declared disabled in December of 2005, the same said
month that I reported that I became the victim of full-time synthetic telepathy, as well as other
related symptoms and illnesses.
Page 12 of 23
If the Court would consider the leqal circumstances surrounding my Whistleblowing activities and
the Federal False Claims Act filing of the Petitioner as it relates to the past 28 years and the
myriad of violations of the Lancaster County District Attorney. The Petitioner wil argue that it is
wholly unfair and unconstitutional not to grant the Petitioner In Forma Pauperis Status. The
Petitioner has filed ample evidence of a pattern and relentless cycle of earning and accumulating
capital and assets, as well building substantial worth through his business interests, only to have
it all extorted through an elaborate civil and criminal scheme to defruad.
Therefore any
attempt to subject the Petitioner to more court related fees is only a continuation of
that same said fraud.
Consideration should be given to Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District,
where the courts interpreted due process, as Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what due
process means. Furthermore, the United States District Courts in Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F
2d. 644) have concluded the following:
Even the probability of unfairness can result in a
defendant being deprived of his due process rights. The focus of these claims are recorded in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 05-2288 and 06-4650. In
addition the Petioner is the MOVANT in the Lisa Michelle Lambrerrt Case and recently filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment, 04-2559, which was recently appealed to the Third Circuit Court
of Appeals.
The preceding cases have been preserved by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in
case no. 07-4474, see attached.

The prosecutorial misconduct the the Petitioner has been subject to has violated his
constitutional rights, but more importantly the abuse or process has prevented the Petitioner from
completing a wealth of claims in both state and federal Courts. 1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18
U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting
constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide
for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are
ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of
individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local government from
federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5,
15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
A case can be made for a RICO violation as defined in the case of United States v. Holck,
389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the
following: Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in an
indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which
attracts different members at different times and which involves different subgroups committing
acts in furtherance of an overall plan. This illustrates the legal analysis of the 1987 conspiracy to
cover-up my International Signal & Control, Plc., whistle blowing activities.
Page 13 of 23
The 29 False Arrests, which under Pennsylvania Law, constitute a conspiracy that may be
proved by circumstantial evidence that is by acts and circumstances sufficient to warrant an
inference that the unlawful combination has been in front of
facts formed for the purpose
charged. See Walcker v. North Wales Boro, 395 F. Supp. 2d. 219. In the same case the following
was supported: Arrestees allegations that the township (Conestoga) and its police officers were
acting in concert and conspiracy and with the purpose of violating arrestees constitutional rights
by subjecting him to unreasonable force, arrest, search, and malicious prosecution and the two
(2) or more officers acted together in throwing arrestee to the ground (April 5 th, 2006 and August
4th, 2006) and forcing him to take two (2) blood tests and holding him in custody. The preceding
pleaded civil conspiracy claims under Pennsylvania Law.
13. In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under Pennsylvania Law,
a plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree or combine with lawful intent to
do an unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act by unlawful means, with proof of malice
with intent to injure the person, his/her property and or business. In the case of United
States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple
conspiracies by the following: Governments, without committing variance between single
conspiracy charges in an indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at
continuing core conspiracy which attracts different members at different times and which
involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan. 1983 Civil
Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the
scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations
to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations
when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to
strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement and
protection from state and local government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241,
242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982,
1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes27 federal crimes and
8 state crimeswithin a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the case,
has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering.
Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in
prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business
gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that
allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages. When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone
under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the
Page 14 of 23
transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a

performance bond. This provision is intended to force a defendant to plead guilty before
indictment. There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business
or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There must also be an "enterprise." The
defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not
one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s)
and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like all Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or
State court. http://www.dealer-magazine.com/index.asp?article=481
Where RICO laws might be applied1
Although some of the RICO predicate acts are extortion and blackmail, one of the most
Successful applications of the RICO laws has been the ability to indict or sanction individuals for
their behavior and actions committed against witnesses and victims in alleged retaliation or
retribution for cooperating with law enforcement or intelligence agencies. The RICO laws can be
alleged in cases where civil lawsuits or criminal charges are brought against individuals or
corporations in retaliation for said individuals or corporations working with law enforcement, or
against individuals or corporations who have sued or filed criminal charges against a defendant.
Anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) laws can be applied in
an attempt to curb alleged abuses of the legal system by individuals or corporations
who utilize the courts as a weapon to retaliate against whistle blowers, victims, or to
silence another's speech. RICO could be alleged if it can be shown that lawyers and/or
their clients conspired and collaborated to concoct fictitious legal complaints solely in
retribution and retaliation for themselves having been brought before the courts. These
laws also apply to victims of clergy abuse where statute of limitations has run out.
References
RICO Suave (http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/rico.asp) . Snopes.com: (21 December
2004). Retrieved on 2006-03-26. 1.
External links
RICO Act from Cornell University'sU. S. Code database
(http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_96.html) Detail of Tanya
Andersen's claim against Atlantic Records (http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2005/10/oregonriaa-victim-fights-back- sues.html) Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act Categories: Articles with
weasel words | United States federal legislation | Organized crime terminology
Page 15 of 23
EXHIBIT FOR
CONSIDERATION
with accompanying DVD Titled
KANE AMICUS DVD
Page 16 of 23
EXHIBIT DOCUMENT FILE LIST (38)

1. 0-LETTER to JAMES COMEY, DIRECTOR of FBI re PRO SE BILLINGS INVOICE Wednesday November 30, 2016.pdf
05.12.2016
624713 pdf
2. 01-COINTELPRO - Case Law The Assassination of Fred Hampton 47 Years Later , by Flint Taylor Attorney,
December 5, 2016.pdf 05.12.2016
34916121
pdf
3. 1-The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking Program - Lancaster City Police
Stregic Plan, August 24, 2016.pdf
05.12.2016
280796 pdf
4. 2-STAN J. CATERBONE and CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION - Monday November 14, 2016.pdf
05.12.2016
12736810
pdf
5. 3-FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence Agencies November 12, 2016.pdf
05.12.2016
90810967
pdf
6. 4-Amici Curiae Filed by Stan J. Caterbone 2007 to 2016 - Kathleen Kane - The National Security Agency NSA Lisa Michelle Lambert - Mehgan Liappatt - May 18, 2016.pdf 05.12.2016
6145848
pdf
7. 5-FEDS PROBE FULTON BANK and 3 other SUBSIDIARY BANKS of FULTON FINANCIAL with STAN J. CATERBONE
CIVIL ACTIONS and Mind Control Research of Monday November 7, 2016.pdf 05.12.2016
41215673
pdf
8. 6-Stan J. Caterbone LOCAL, STATE, and FEDERAL COURT DOCKET SHEETS as of November 12, 2016.pdf
05.12.2016
52519867
pdf
9. 7-Stan J. Caterbone United Nations Human Rights Council of Geneva Switzerland Complaint and Exhibit re U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control, Oct 4, 2009.pdf.pdf 05.12.2016
36042567
pdf
10. 8-CATERBONE v. the United States of America, et.al., COMPLAINT July 20, 2016 ver 3.0 July 22, 2016.pdf
05.12.2016
22161323
pdf
11. 9-MEMORANDUM FOR PRESIDENT OBAMA re Leniency for Edward Snowden by 15 FORMER INTELLIGENCE
MEMBERS November 28, 2016 with Director Comey Letter December 1, 2016.pdf
05.12.2016
2628625
pdf
12. 10-Superior Court Case No. Case No. 1219 MDA 2016 BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL AND GRANTING OF
INJUNCTION Thursday December 1, 2016.pdf 05.12.2016
3166268
pdf
13. 11-Superior Court Case No. Case No. 1219 MDA 2016 MOTION TO CLARIFY RECORD FROM LOWER COURT
December 2, 2016.pdf 05.12.2016
1351274
pdf
14. 12-Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 3576 EDA 2016 REQUEST FOR APPEARANCE re Kathleen Kane
Amicus in Support of Motion to DISMISS Charges November 30, 2016.pdf
05.12.2016
532479 pdf
15. 13 - Advanced Media Group ORIGINAL INVOICES and ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES for November 30, 2016 Updated
December 1, 2016.pdf 05.12.2016
16735360
pdf
16. 14-Invoice to SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ASH CARTER for Victimization of U.S. Sponsored Torture Program
December 2, 2016.pdf 05.12.2016
3104639
pdf
17. 15-LETTER and DOCUMENT to Cappello & Noel, LLP of Santa Barbara, CA Friday November 25, 2016.pdf
05.12.2016
35068104
pdf
18. 16-Federal False Claim Act Filing of October 19 2006 4200 AUTHENTIC ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS November 26,
2016.pdf
05.12.2016
588809867
pdf
19. 17-Stan J. Caterbone BOOKMARKS and HISTORY December 5, 2016.pdf
05.12.2016
4212654
pdf
20. 18-Supreme Court of the United States Case No. 16-8822 COMPLETE FILE re CATERBONE v. Allison Hallet, re
Lisa Lambert Habeus November 22, 2016.pdf 05.12.2016
12700920
pdf
21. 19-Samuel Caterbone Jr Naval Air Gunners School Honors 1943.pdf 20.12.2016
258417 pdf
22. 20-Samuel Caterbone Jr Naval Air Gunners School Certificate 1.pdf
20.12.2016
104409 pdf
23. 21-Naval Air Gunners Training Manual June 1 1943.pdf
20.12.2016
3701618
pdf
24. 22-Samuel P. Caterbone (My Father) Criminal Charges.pdf
20.12.2016
70766 pdf
25. 23-Naval Air Technical Training Center Photo Album.pdf
20.12.2016
5899658
pdf
26. 24 Criminal Charges Dismissed 1987 to 2007.pdf
20.12.2016
347656 pdf
27. 24-Samuel Caterbone Naval Air Gunners Honors 1943.pdf
20.12.2016
139674 pdf
28. 25-Dismissed Criminal Charges April 6 2007.pdf
20.12.2016
1317168
pdf
29. 26-1975 United States Senate Select Hearings on MKultra.pdf 20.12.2016
1828709
pdf
30. 27-ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Mark Zuckerberg and his FACEBOOK MIND CONTROL STRATEGIES and KNOWN
ATHEIST Tuesday August 30, 2016.pdf 20.12.2016
2551914
pdf
31. 28-Authentic and ORIGINAL Documents of 1987 RESTORED ON DECEMBER 15, 2016.pdf
20.12.2016
71690158
pdf
32. 29-Calhoun Private Criminal Complaint Sept 22 2007.pdf
20.12.2016
245271 pdf
33. 30-Dave Plummer offers counsel in a crisis.pdf 20.12.2016
99087 pdf
34. 31-David Schuyler Franklin & Marshall - Reunion 2007 Schedule of Events.pdf 20.12.2016
930201 pdf
35. 32-Electronic Mind Control & Timothy McVeigh jan 3 2008.pdf 20.12.2016
132969 pdf
36. 33-Email to Paul Cambell re 3179-06 Appeal April 5 2008 CORRUPTION IN THE FLEEING CRIMINAL CASE AND
APPEAL June 28, 2016.pdf
20.12.2016
142674 pdf
37. 34-Exhibit D of Duke Street Samuel Caterbone Criminal File Mar 4, 2009.pdf 20.12.2016
3248306
pdf
38. 35-Letter to Epic Card re Complaint of Bonnie Lee Polygraph Solutions August11, 2015.pdf
20.12.2016
28004831
pdf
DVD EXHIBIT
3575
EDA 2016
FILE
- AMICUS
LIST BRIEF
Page
Page17
3 of 23
4
Wednesday
Friday December 23,
21, 2016
EXHIBIT AUDIO FILE LIST (28)

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
ALTANA Rooftop Bar June 25, 2016 - Conspiracy to Commit

Appointment with Dr. Brian Sullivan of Abbeyville Family Medicine-LGH re Pain Management of March
Audio Appointment with Psychiatrist Al Shulz in January of 1998 in his Office in York, Pennsylvania
Audio of Call to KENS TV5 re Broadcast of Dr. John Hall March 8, 2010
Audio of FFCHS Conference Call with Orville re Survey of TI's on Surge of EXTREME PAIN and TERROR on March
11, 2010
6. AUDIO of Fulton Bank Harassment on EXTREME PAIN and TERROR on March 11, 2010.mp3
7. Audio Recordings of 1987 - PA SEC-PA Atty Gen-Gamillion Film Studios-Power Station Studios-Sandra Gray Atty
8. Call to Assistant U.S. Attorney Chrystie Fawcett During Serving of 302 Petition on April 8, 2010
9. Conversation and Plea for Help with Pennsylvania Attorney Bodan on October 19, 1987
10. Conversation With Attorney David Drubner on July 10, 1987
11. Conversation With Lancaster Aviation President Chuck Smith re Illegal Reposession of Aircraft on
12. Dr. John Hall Radio Show of FFCHS Press Conference of April 19, 2010 in Louisville Kentucky
13. FFCHS Conference Call re Takeover December 15, 2015
14. Harassment and Malic at NovaCare Rehabilitation for Physical Therapy on April 1, 2010
15. Meeting With Attorney Sandra Grey in San Diego on February 24, 1988
16. Meeting with Howard Eisler, Investigator With The Pennsylvania Securities Commission re ISC of September 29,
1987
17. Meeting With Pennsylvania Securities Commission Agent Howard Eisler of September 29, 1987
18. Message from Liapatt Attorney Julie Cooper re Email March 15, 2010
19. Message From Lt. Detective Clark Bearinger re Psychiatric Appointment of April 23, 2010
20. My Appearance on FFCHS Talkshoe Conference with Orville April 1, 2010 Online Chat
21. Phone Conversation With Pennsylvania Securities Commission Agent Howard Eisler on October 17, 1987
22. Recording of Dale Graff on Coast to Coast re Remote Viewing - Project Stargate - DIA with My Commentary
February 17, 2010
23. Return Call from U.S. Attorney Christie Fawcett on February 22, 2010 9-58AM
24. Second Conversation With Atty Drubner & Meeting With Film Studio Gamillion Studios of Hollywood Jul
25. Segments of My Appearence and Interview on FFCHS Talkshoe Conference with Orville April 1, 2010
26. Sgt. Busser of Southern Regional Police 302 Fleeing Arrest AUDIO Recording With Commentary of Apr
27. The Jim Guest Show Week 3 with Dr. Hall and Dr. Robertson re Electromagnetic Weapons November 29, 2009
28. TS-340595 4-01-2010-My Appearence on FFCHS Talkshoe Conference with Orville April 1, 2010 Online Chat
DVD EXHIBIT
3575
EDA 2016
FILE
- AMICUS
LIST BRIEF
Page
Page18
4 of 23
4
Wednesday
Friday December 23,
21, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
November 28, 2016
James Comey, Director
FBI Headquarters
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
(202) 324-3000
Re:
ALLEGATION: COINTELPRO PROGRAM WITH HARASSMENT USED TO OBSTRUCT

JUSTICE IN MY CIVIL AND CRIMINAL COURT PROCEEDINGS
Dear Director Comey,

It comes with great regret and frustration that I must write you this unfortunate letter,
however, I see no other way to stop these attacks against me while I attempt to litigate in
Federal, State, and Local Courts. My most recent case, US Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822.
For your information COINTELPRO is defined as this:
COINTELPRO (a portmanteau derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a series of
covert, and at times illegal,[1][2] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic
political organizations.[3]
FBI records show that COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the FBI
deemed subversive,[4] including anti-Vietnam War organizers, activists of the Civil Rights
Movement or Black Power movement (e.g., Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Black Panther
Party), feminist organizations, anti-colonial movements (such as Puerto Rican independence
groups like the Young Lords), and a variety of organizations that were part of the broader New
Left.
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover issued directives governing COINTELPRO, ordering FBI agents to
"expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, neutralize or otherwise eliminate" the activities of these
movements and especially their leaders.[5][6] Under Hoover, the agent in charge of
COINTELPRO was William C. Sullivan.[7] Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy personally
authorized some of these programs.[8] Although Kennedy only gave written approval for
limited wiretapping of King's phones "on a trial basis, for a month or so",[9] Hoover extended
the clearance so his men were "unshackled" to look for evidence in any areas of King's life they
deemed worthy.[10]
Obstruction of Justice is defined as this as it relates to me and this dire situation:
(1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill another person with intent to retaliate against any person
for
(A) the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony given or
any record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an official proceeding; or
(B) providing to a law enforcement officer any information relating to the commission or
possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation, supervised
release, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings.
Page 19 of 23
In the article by By Rahul D. Manchanda, Esq. Dated Aug 22, 2016, The
Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking

Program
linked here:
http://moderndiplomacy.eu/index.phpoption=com_k2&view=item&id=1686:thesurreptitious-reincarnation-of-cointelpro-with-the-cops-gang-stalkingprogram&Itemid=488
Mr. Manchanda writes,
In 1975 Senator Frank Church convened a joint senatorial/congressional
inquiry into the egregious human rights and civil liberties violations of the
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA), as well
as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) against people both foreign and
domestic. Such blatant transgressions included the neutralization and
elimination of political dissidents, enemies of the state, real or imagined
threats to National Security, and anyone else on the proverbial shit list of the
Military Industrial Complex (MIC).
The Church Committee was the United States Senate Select Committee to Study
Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a U.S. Senate
committee chaired by Senator Frank Church (D ID) in 1975. A precursor to the U.S.
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the committee investigated intelligence
gathering for illegality by the aforementioned agencies after certain activities had been
revealed by the Watergate affair.
Some famous examples which have since emerged include: (1) the FBI sending letters
to Martin Luther King Jr encouraging him to kill himself or else they would tell the world
about his sexual proclivities; (2) the planned or successful assassinations of foreign
leaders such as Fidel Castro, Patrice Lumumba, and countless other South American,
Middle Eastern or Asian leaders; (3) the wholesale undermining of entire foreign
economies if they democratically elected someone at odds with the elite power structure
deep state of the United States such as what occurred against Salvatore Allende of
Guatemala; (4) the possible assassination of John F Kennedy; (5) revelations of
Christopher Pyle in January 1970 of the U.S. Army's spying on the civilian population;
(6) the December 22, 1974 New York Times article by Seymour Hersh detailing
operations engaged in by the CIA over the years that had been dubbed the "family
jewels, involving covert action programs involving assassination attempts against
foreign leaders and covert attempts to subvert foreign governments were reported for
the first time; (7) efforts by intelligence agencies to collect information on the political
activities of US citizens; and (8) countless other examples, both overseas and
domestically.
The end result of the Church Committee Hearings was the outright banning on CIA
assassinations as well as the FBI/DOJ COINTELPRO gang-stalking programs. In 1975
and 1976, the Church Committee published fourteen reports on various U.S. intelligence
agencies' formation, operations, and the alleged abuses of law and of power that they
had committed, with recommendations for reform, some of which were later put in
place.
According to attorney Brian Glick in his book War at Home, the FBI used four
main methods during COINTELPRO:
(1) Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their
main purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine
trust and scare off potential supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear
genuine activists as agents;
Page 20 of 23
(2) Psychological warfare: The FBI and police used myriad "dirty tricks" to
undermine progressive movements. They planted false media stories and published
bogus leaflets and other publications in the name of targeted groups. They forged
correspondence, sent anonymous letters, and made anonymous telephone calls. They
spread misinformation about meetings and events, set up pseudo movement groups run
by government agents, and manipulated or strong armed parents, employers, landlords,
school officials and others to cause trouble for activists. They used bad jacketing to
create suspicion about targeted activists, sometimes with lethal consequences;
(3) Harassment via the legal system: The FBI and police abused the legal system to
harass dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave
perjured testimony and presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and
wrongful imprisonment. They discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government
regulations and used conspicuous surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand
jury subpoenas in an effort to intimidate activists and silence their supporters;
(4) Illegal force: The FBI conspired with local police departments to threaten
dissidents; to conduct illegal break ins in order to search dissident homes; and to
commit vandalism, assaults, beatings and assassinations. The object was to frighten or
eliminate dissidents and disrupt their movements.
Unfortunately I cannot leave my home with being stalked, harassed and threatened by
neighbors, passerby's, etc., On a daily basis I have someone, or groups of people entering my
home, vandalizing, stealing, and poisoning my food. To make matters worse, this protocol
follows me in federal, state, and local courthouses. Every electronic device that I have and use
is compromised and hacked in some fashion. Every online account is the same, and every
financial account, including checking accounts, vendor accounts, utilities, etc., contains some
form of fraud and theft by deception costing me money.
Well, the following links are my supporting evidence, and NOW I WISH YOU AND YOUR
FAMILY A VERY HAPPY AND MERRY CHRISTMAS. DON'T EVER TAKE YOUR FREEDOM FOR
GRANTED, SIR! I WISH I HAD THE FREEDOM YOU AND YOUR FAMILY ENJOYS.
STAN J. CATERBONE and CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION Monday November 14, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/331068312/Stan-J-Caterbone-andConflicts-With-the-Trump-Administration-Monday-November-14-2016
FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence

Agencies November 12, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/330869219/False-Imprisonments-andIllegal-Interrogations-by-U-S-Intelligence-Agencies-November-12-2016
Stan J. Caterbone LOCAL, STATE, and FEDERAL COURT DOCKET SHEETS as of

November 12, 2016 - https://www.scribd.com/document/330921500/Stan-JCaterbone-Local-State-And-Federal-Court-811-Pages-Bookmarks-DocketSheets-as-of-November-12-2016
FEDS PROBE FULTON BANK and 3 other SUBSIDIARY BANKS of FULTON

FINANCIAL with STAN J. CATERBONE CIVIL ACTIONS and Mind Control
Research of Monday November 7, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/330528930/Feds-Probe-Fulton-Bankand-3-Other-Subsidiary-Banks-of-Fulton-Financial-With-Stan-J-CaterboneCivil-Actions-and-Mind-Control-Research-of-Monday-Novem
Page 21 of 23
U.S. SUPREME COURT DOCKET, U.S. SUPREME COURT PEITIION, AND Letter
REQUEST FOR COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to
President Obama, November 15, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/331393349/Supreme-Court-of-theUnited-States-Case-No-16-8822-DOCKET-and-COMMUTATION-LETTER-toOBAMA-Re-CATERBONE-v-Allison-Hallet-Re-Lisa-Lambert-Habeus-Nove
Stan J. Caterbone United Nations Human Rights Council of Geneva Switzerland

Complaint and Exhibit re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, Oct 4, 2009.pdf
https://www.scribd.com/document/291083335/Stan-J-Caterbone-UnitedNations-Human-Rights-Council-of-Geneva-Switzerland-Complaint-and-Exhibitre-U-S-Sponsored-Mind-Control-October-4-2009-pdf
CATERBONE v. Unted States of America, et.al., Case No. 16-cv-0414 in the

United States Disctrict Court for Eastern Pennsylvania
https://www.scribd.com/document/318862497/CATERBONE-v-the-UnitedStates-of-America-Et-al-COMPLAINT-July-20-2016-Ver-2-0-Full
Respectfully,
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Page 22 of 23
PROOF
SERVICE
IN SUPPORT OF QUASHING
THEOF
CHARGES
IN MONTGOMERY COURT CASE NO. CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
I hereby certify that on or about December 23, 2016 SERVICE VIA ELECTRONIC
MAIL WAS SENT TO THE FOLLOWING:
Lock, Joshua D.
Law Firm: Goldberg Katzman, P.C.
Address: Goldberg Katzman PC
Phone No: (717) 234-4161
Served: Kevin R. Steele
Email: ksteele@montcopa.org
Address:
Phone: 610-278-3098
Served: Robert Martin Falin
Email: rfalin@montcopa.org
Address:
Phone: 610-278-3102
Served: Robert Martin Falin
Service Method: eService
Email: rfalin@montcopa.org
Service Date:July 13, 2016
Address: Montgomery County Courthouse
P.O. Box 311
Phone: 610-278-3104
DATE: DECEMBER 23, 2016

____________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-528-2200
Page 23 of 23
4:36 P.M.
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 3
December 23, 2016
CAPTION
v.
Appellant
CASE INFORMATION
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Decided/Active
December 22, 2016
Awaiting Remittal
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Criminal
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Perjury
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
3575 EDA 2016

Related
SCHEDULED EVENT

Next Event Type: Record Remitted

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
No
No
Lock, Joshua D.
Goldberg Katzman PC
(717) 234-4161
Phone No:
Amicus
Pro Se:
Fax No:
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Yes
Stanley J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
Neither the Appellate Courts nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability
4:36 P.M.
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 3
December 23, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellee
Pro Se:
No
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Steele, Kevin R.
PO Box 311
(610) 278-3098
Fax No:
Phone No:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:

P.O. Box 311
(610) 278-3102
Fax No: (610) 278-3841
Phone No:
FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
Fee Amt Receipt Dt
11/22/2016
Notice of Appeal
85.50 11/30/2016
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
2016-SPR-E-002064
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Montgomery
Division:
October 24, 2016
Judicial District:
November 30, 2016
T6863802
T7090322
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Judge

38
November 22, 2016
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Filed Date
Content Description

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
November 30, 2016
November 30, 2016
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant

November 30, 2016
Application for Leave to File Amicus Brief

Amicus
85.50
4:36 P.M.
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 3
December 23, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
December 9, 2016
Other
Participant Type
Filed By
Eldridge, Lisa A.
Document Name: Per TC Judge's chambers - Extension of time granted through 1/6/17 to file 1925(b) statement
December 16, 2016
December 21, 2016

Appellant
Order
Per Curiam
Comment: Upon consideration of the Petitioner's "Request The Courtesy Of The

Court To Appear Pro Se And To File An Amicus Curaie [sic] Brief In Support
Of The Following," filed by "Stan J. Caterbone," the petitioner shall not be
permitted to present oral argument.
December 22, 2016
Dismissed Sua Sponte

Per Curiam
Comment: This appeal is hereby dismissed as duplicative of the appeal docketed at

No. 3575 EDA 2016.
DISPOSITION INFORMATION
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Yes
Disposition Comment:
This appeal is hereby dismissed as duplicative of the appeal docketed at

No. 3575 EDA 2016.
Filing Author:
Dispositional Filing:
Filed Date:
Disposed Before Decision

Dismissed Sua Sponte
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
Per Curiam
December 22, 2016
4:37 P.M.
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 2
December 23, 2016
CAPTION
v.
Appellant
CASE INFORMATION
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Active
November 30, 2016
Awaiting Original Record
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Criminal
Case Type(s):
Perjury
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
3576 EDA 2016

Related
SCHEDULED EVENT

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
No
No
Lock, Joshua D.
Goldberg Katzman PC
(717) 234-4161
Phone No:
Appellee
Pro Se:
Fax No:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
No
Steele, Kevin R.
PO Box 311
(610) 278-3098
Fax No:
P.O. Box 311
(610) 278-3102
Fax No: (610) 278-3841
4:37 P.M.
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 2
December 23, 2016
FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
Fee Amt Receipt Dt
11/22/2016
Notice of Appeal
85.50 11/30/2016
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
2016-SPR-E-002063
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Montgomery
Division:
October 24, 2016
Judicial District:
November 30, 2016
T6863802
T7090322
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Judge

38
November 22, 2016
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Filed Date
Content Description

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
November 30, 2016
November 30, 2016
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant

December 9, 2016
Other
Eldridge, Lisa A.
Document Name: Per TC Judge's chambers - Extension granted throught 1/6/17 to file 1925(b) statement.
December 16, 2016

Appellant
85.50
P
usps.com
Legal Flat Rt Env
062S0000000309
Click-N-Ship
Mailed from 17603
9405 5036 9930 0460 2286 85 0064 5000 0021 9106

$6.45
US POSTAGE
12/23/2016
0006
Expected Delivery Date: 12/28/16
C047
PRIORITY MAIL 2-DAY
STAN CATERBONE
AMG
1250 FREMONT ST
LANCASTER PA 17603-6812
Carrier -- Leave if No Response
PHILADELPHIA PA 19106-3623
SHIP PROTHONOTARY
TO: PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT
530 WALNUT ST
STE 315
USPS TRACKING #
9405 5036 9930 0460 2286 85
Electronic Rate Approved #038555749
Cut on dotted line.
Click-N-Ship Label Record
Instructions
1. Each Click-N-Ship label is unique. Labels are to be
USPS TRACKING # :
used as printed and used only once. DO NOT PHOTO

COPY OR ALTER LABEL.
2. Place your label so it does not wrap around the edge of

the package.
3. Adhere your label to the package. A self-adhesive label
is recommended. If tape or glue is used, DO NOT TAPE
OVER BARCODE. Be sure all edges are secure.
4. To mail your package with PC Postage, you
may schedule a Package Pickup online, hand to
your letter carrier, take to a Post Office, or
drop in a USPS collection box.
5. Mail your package on the "Ship Date" you
selected when creating this label.
9405 5036 9930 0460 2286 85

Trans. #:
Print Date:
Ship Date:
Expected
Delivery Date:
From:
To:
393774810
12/23/2016
12/23/2016
Priority Mail Postage:

Total
$6.45
$6.45
12/28/2016
STAN CATERBONE
AMG
1250 FREMONT ST
PROTHONOTARY
PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT
530 WALNUT ST
STE 315
PHILADELPHIA PA 19106-3623
* Retail Pricing Priority Mail rates apply. There is no fee for USPS Tracking service
on Priority Mail service with use of this electronic rate shipping label. Refunds for
unused postage paid labels can be requested online 30 days from the print date.
Thank you for shipping with the United States Postal Service!
Check the status of your shipment on the USPS Tracking page at usps.com
Shipment Confirmation
Acceptance Notice
A. Mailer Action
Note To Mailer:
The labels and volume associated to this form

online, must match the labeled packages being presented to the
USPS employee with this form.
12/23/16
Shipment Date:_______________________________
Shipped From:
STAN CATERBONE
AMG
1250 FREMONT ST
Type of Mail
Volume
Priority Mail
Priority Mail Express*
International Mail*
Other
0
Total Volume
*Start time for products with service guarantees will begin when mail arrives at the local Post Office
and items receive individual processing and acceptance scans.
B. USPS Action
USPS EMPLOYEE: Please scan upon pickup or receipt of mail. Leave form with customer or in customer's mail receptacle.
Employee verifies the package volume count on the Package Pickup Carrier Manifest.
- If the volume on the manifest matches the volume being collected from the customer, the employee should make the 1:YES selection
by pressing the number 1 on the keypad of the handheld scanner, or on the keyboard of the POS ONE terminal.
- If the volume on the manifest does not match the volume being collected from the customer, the employee should make the 2:NO
selection. The mail should still be collected and dispatched as normal.
USPS SCAN
9475 7036 9930 0208 0640 73
PS Form 5630, PSN 7530-08-000-4335, July 5, 2006

STAN CATERBONE NAMED AMICUS FOR KATHLEEN KANE Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 3575 EDA 2016 FRIDAY JANUARY 20, 2017

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

STAN CATERBONE NAMED AMICUS FOR KATHLEEN KANE Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 3575 EDA 2016 FRIDAY JANUARY 20, 2017

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

4:36 P.M.

Appeal Docket Sheet

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Docket Number: 3575 EDA 2016

Case Processing Status:

November 30, 2016

Awaiting Original Record

3576 EDA 2016

Next Event Type: Original Record Received

Next Event Due Date: January 23, 2017

Kane, Kathleen Granahan

the Appellate Courts nor the Administrative

Appeal Docket Sheet

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Docket Number: 3575 EDA 2016

Falin, Robert Martin

Fee Amt Receipt Dt

AGENCY/TRIAL COURT INFORMATION

Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas

Lower Ct Docket No(s):

Montgomery County Criminal Division

ORIGINAL RECORD CONTENT

Original Record Item

Date of Remand of Record:

Docket Entry / Representing

November 30, 2016

Notice of Appeal Docketed

November 30, 2016

Kane, Kathleen Granahan

Docketing Statement Exited (Criminal)

the Appellate Courts nor the Administrative

Appeal Docket Sheet

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Docket Number: 3575 EDA 2016

Docket Entry / Representing

Docketing Statement Received (Criminal)

Application for Leave to File Amicus Brief

Kane, Kathleen Granahan

December 28, 2016

January 19, 2017

Kane, Kathleen Granahan

the Appellate Courts nor the Administrative

Freedom From Covert Harassment &

1250 Fremont Street

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Docket Number: 3575 EDA 2016

EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT OF THE AMICUS BRIEF

Wednesday January 18, 2017

1250 Fremont Street

Wednesday January 18, 2017

ACTIVE COURT CASES

10. U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania

3575 EDA 2016 - AMICUS EXHIBIT

Case No. 16-10157

Wednesday January 18, 2017

DATE: JANUARY 18, 2017

1250 Fremont Street

3575 EDA 2016 - AMICUS EXHIBIT

Wednesday January 18, 2017

IN SUPPORT OF QUASHING THE CHARGES IN MONTGOMERY COURT CASE NO. CP-46-CR-0006239-2015

Freedom From Covert Harassment &

1250 Fremont Street

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA