7

cerriricate or Bond Reduction/Reconsideration

F T-k 5 ru

Dear Judge Stelzer.

Comes now the defendant Michael Fullilove now known as Marshawn Sha'ul 1422-CR00351-01

me elthrough and by Legal counselto request of this Honorable court the urgency of a hearing

for the reconsideration of the bond in question which has deprived the defendant of his
liberties from 120 days pursuing to date of this motion. The defendant is a white and Native
American Cherokee Moor Flesh and Blood Man, who has completed 40 solar cycle (40 years of
age). His is an lndigenous autochthon who lives on Cahokia Missouria Turtle lsland. Article L0 of
the UNDRIP says that lndigenous people shall not be forcefully removed from their lands or
territories. No relocation shall take place without the free, prior and inform and consent of the
lndigenous people concerned and after agreement on just and fair compensation and, where
possible with the option of return. Removing the defendant from his homeland and relocation
him to the MSI Medium Security lnstitution without his free, prior and inform consent
.
l- -.-^---r^r.-L--^^1.-t:-l-----^
-t -:,1-r:-----i*l-L-tr,--1,--^.--.-^--:-l--rv+, )C LUil
l[t(]ttefious Itt,Iil.s,
Ilutltiln
Iltnt5,
Iluu5e JUlnt resuruLrun ldi
vtotattons ot
cons[tlules- ot
resolution 25, Presidential Executive order 73107 Congressional Records may L1, L955. lt says
in article 13 paragraph 2. That states shall take effective measures to insure that this right is
protected and also to insure that lndigenous Peoples can understand and be understood
political legal, and administrative procedures when necessary though the provisions of
interpretations or by other appropriate means. The allege warrant 16-STFTA-165 was never
served, showed upon request, no affidavit to validate the warrant which constitutes false arrest
and kidnapping, title 18 usc 1201 violations. Not only was the defendant not taking properly to
a magistrate/judge as require by law, confirmation can be found in the Mc Nabb doctrine,
Michael Kellan Mullen refuse to see the defendant despite the request for a public hearing and
to dismiss, both which were Tender enter on the record while Michael kellan Mullen
was still in division 16. This was clearly a miscarriage of justice on upon judge Mlchael Kellan
Mullen. Defendant has a treaty with the govern Via his statutory declaration his also confirm
by title 28 usc L3 section 1360 (b), which has been tender to Michael Kellan Mullan and the
courts. The defendant is Native to this Land and is Not a Flight risk. The defendant is on a bio
cellular electrical diet which consist of non hybrid fresh fruits, and vegetables no starch no
process foods and filter water PH (7) or higher. This diet is in harmony and his rights article 24
on the UNDRIP, were at says, lndigenous peoples have the right to their traditional medicine
and to maintain their health practice, including the conservation of their vital medicinal plants,
animal and minerals. lndigenous individual also have the right to access, without any
discrimination, to all social and health services. 2. lndigenous peoples have an equal right to the
enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. States shall take
the necessary steps with a view to achieving progressively the full realization of this. Dale Glass
and this staff or Not respecting this right and It is causing many health concerns causing
a motion

,:

=--

deteriorating of the defendant health. This incarceration deprives the defendant to be present
in dealing with the family court, to reunite him with his children. This institution as no law
:_'iii iii,J,!b-,
::
': : -'
iiiiiivUti
vLiUrrv
tjr rriU ii$rtL Lv
iiUaai-y

WiliCir

ucpitvcu

riis

iriCiruqrrr

PrvpUrij

matter. This is a violation of article 14 of the international political rights. His mail in being
obstructed and tempered with as well. As such a urgent appeal is sought by this court to release
the defendant on his own recognizance as there is no victim or injured party involve in this
matter. The most that can reasonable can be posted at this time would be 10,000 at 1A% (1000)
which would be with the assisted of many family and friends giving what they can share. The
defendant and his mate respectfully seek the assistant of this Honorable court in true spirit of
justice for his prompt release...

Cc: Gorrernor of MissoLtri (Chief Magistrate)

Jurat
United Nations Declaration on the right of Indigenous Peoples(http://www.un.arg./esa/socdevlunpfii/documents/DRlPS en.p3l) United Nations Convention on
Economic, Social & cultural Rights, United Nations Charter; Article 55 & 56, Presidential
proclamation 7500,H.J.R. 194, S. Con. Res. 26 S. 1200, HJR-3

Affirmed to and subscribed before me this

Oay of

2017

By:

Affiant UCC
,XtDe rr'ttt ,i'

*l'

uce Identification

'6,;1 { rtNotary /

Type and # ID

y/l.,/Zu

308

without prej

'16(oazr

My Commission Expires

Public

UNDER

the Missouri Sunshine Law 610.010

r... I Sion a Haley now known as

Moor on
ul me el lndigenous
the behalf of Michael Fullilove now known as Marshawn Sha ul me el. Request the oath of Office,
lndemnity Bond, EIN for transparency of government in the true spirit of justice; as a Judge is to be fair
and impartial as a public ofticial while administering his public duties... This infor.mation can be
forwarded to C/O PO box 775133l63t771Thank you for your Time....

ffi*.ry#m

Cc: Governor (Chief Magistrate)

goJuotctAl

ctflflrr

C8rcUfr C&ERKSOFFICE

qf,

DEPUTy

Jurat
United Nations Declaration on the right of Indigenous Peoples&tto://rn,rvw.un.orq./esa/soqdeviunpfiildocumentslDRl United Nations Convention on
Economic, Social & cultural Rights, United Nations Charter; Article 55 & 56, Presidential
proclamation 7500,H.J.R. 194, S. Con. Res. 26 S. 1200, HJR-3

Affrrmed to and subscribed before

*" tftir&

day of Jan

2017

Affiant U

r<
Public

Producetdentification

ff
Notary

'r/- i
'/

Type and # ID

Du

without prejudice

1-3

-l
I

/6 &*c>zr

fnA
ot/nr/2n t3

Decei-nber i9, 2009. The Apoiogy Resclution was inciuCed as Section 8113 in the 201C Defense
Approprrations Act, l-.l.R. 3325, Public Law No. 111-118.
The Apotogy Resclution had criEinally been 9[ansSi-ed in the Senate by Senatcr Sam Brownback (R(S) as S..r. R.es. 14. A ccnrpanion measure, H.l. Res. 46, was aiso been introduced in the House by
Dan Boren (D-OK) eariier this year. Senatcr Brownback successfu!ly added the Apclogy
to the Defense Apprcpriations Act as an amendment cn the Senate floor on Octcber 1,
2009.

cr 3rcwnback said that he intrcduced the rneasure "to officraliy apologize for the past iiiived poiicies by the iJS Gover;r;irent tcwarC the Native Peoples of thrs iand and re-aflirrn cur
conrmitrne:rt tovvard healing cur nation's wcunds and worktng toward establishing better reiationships
rooted in reccnciiiation."
Apologv Resclution states that the UniteC States, "apclogizes cn behalf of the people cf the i.Jnitei
es tc all Native Peoples fcr the many instances of violence, maltreatment, and neglect inflicted cn
t'Iaiive Peoples by citizens cf the United States."
Apoi.ogy Resoluticn also "ui'ges tne President to acknowledge the wrongs oF the United States
nst lnCian tribes in the histcry of lne Unrted States in order to bring heating tc th!s land."

Apology Resolution comes with a disclaimer that nothing in the Resoiution authorizes or supports
legai clalms agalnst the United States and that the Resoiution does not settie any ciair,ns aEainst

Unliei States.
A,poicgy R.esolution does not inciude the lengthy Preanrble that was part of S.J R.es. 14 inLroduced
earlier this year by Senator 3r'ownback. The Preambie recites the history of U.S. - tribal reiations

including the asslstance provided tc the settlers by Native Americans, the kiliing of Indian women and
ren, the Trail of Tears, the Lcng Walk, lhe Sand Creek Massacre, and Wounded Knee, the theft of
I lanCs and i'escr:rces, the breaking of treaties, and the removal of Indian children to boarding

Announcement of U.S. Support for the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of lndigenous Peoples
lnitiatives to promote the Government-to-Government Relationship & lmprove the Lives of lndigenous
Heritage Month, President Obama recommitted -to supporting tribal self-determination, security and
prosperity for all Native Americans. He recognized that -[w]hile we cannot erase the scourges or
joint
broken promises of our past, we will move ahead together in writing a new, brighter chapter in our
history. lt is in this spirit that the United States today proudly lends its support to the United Nations
Declaration on the Rights of lndigenous Peoples (Declaration). ln September 2007, at the United
countries voted in favor of the Declaration. The United States did not. Today, in response
to the many calls from Native Americans throughout this country and in order to further U.S. policy on
indigenous issues, President Obama announced that the United States has changed its position. The
Nations,

1"43

United States supports the Declaration, which-while not legalty binding or a statement of current
international law-has both moral and political force. lt expresses both the aspirations of indigenous
peoples around the world and those of States in seeking to improve their relations with indigenous
peoples. Most importantly, it expresses aspirations of the United States, aspirations that this country
seeks to achieve within the structure of the U.S. Constitution, laws, and international obligations, while
also seeking, where appropriate, to improve our laws and policies. U.S. support for the Declaration goes
hand in hand with the U.S. commitment to address the consequences of a history in which, as President
Obama recognizeci, -few have been more marginaiized anci ignoreci by Washington foi'as iong as
Native Americans*our First Americans. That commitment is reflected in the many policies and

programs that are being implemented by U.S. agencies in response to concerns raised by Native
Americans, including poverty, unemployment, environmentaldegradation, health care gaps, violent
crime, and discrimination. ll. The Review of the U.S. Position on the Declaration The decision to review
the U.S. positiononthe Declaration came in responseto callsfrom manytribes, individual Native
Americans, civil society, and others in the United States, who believed that U.S. support for the
Declaration would make an important contribution to U.S. policy and practice with respect to Native

American issues. The decision by the United States to support the Declaration was the result of a
thorough review of the Declaration by the relevant federal agencies. 2 ln conducting its review of the
Declaration, U.S. agencies consulted extensively with tribal leaders during three rounds of consultations,
one in Rapid City, South Dakota, and two in Washington, D.C. ln addition, the agencies conducted
outreach to indigenous organizations, civil society, and other interested individuals. Tribal leaders and
others contributed to the review through their attendance at the consultation and outreach sessions,
participation in those sessions by means of conference calls, and written submissions. ln total, over
3,000 written comments were received and reviewed. Tribes, groups, and individuals who participated
in the review of the U.S. position on the Declaration presented a wide range of views on the meaning
and importance of the Declaration. While they could not all be directly reflected in the U.S' position on

the Declaration, they were all considered in the process. lll. The Declaration and U.S. lnitiatives on
Native American Issues The United States is home to over two million Native Americans, 565 federally
recognized lndian tribes, and other indigenous communities. U.S. support for the Declaration reflects
the U.S. commitment to work with those tribes, individuals, and communities to address the many
challenges they face. The United States aspires to improve relations with indigenous peoples by looking
to the principles embodied in the Declaration in its dealings with federally recognized tribes, while also

working, as appropriate, with alI indigenous individuals and communities in the United States.
Moreover, the United States is committed to serving as a modelin the internationalcommunitrT in

;;:*.:A=re=X#

;j;;;11;=*;=.::

individuals. The United States underlines its support for the Declaration's recognition in the preamble
that indigenous individuals are entitled without discrimination to all human rights recognized in
international law, and that indigenous peoples possess certain additional, collective rights. The United
States reads allof the provisions of the Declaration in light of this understanding of hurnan rights and
collective rights. U.S. agencies are currently engaged in numerous initiatives to address the concerns
raised by Native American leaders and issues addressed in the Declaration. Many involve the
continuation of activities highlighted in the White House Tribal Nations Conference Progress Report
released in June 2010. Additional efforts to strengthen the government-to-government relationship,
protect lands and the environment and provide redress, address health care gaps, prornote sustainable

economic development, and protect Native American cultures are addressed below. lll. L Strengthening
can't - and
the Government-to-Government Relationship As President Obama noted:

-Washington

- dictate a policy agenda for lndian Country. Tribal nations do better when they make their
own decisions. The record over the forty years since the United States adopted its poliay of greater
tribal autonomy is clear 3 - tribal self-determination has enabted tribal governments to establish,
shouldn't

develop, and enhance tdbal institutions and infrastructure ranging from those addressing the health,
education, and welfare of their communities to those such as tribal courts, fire protection, and law
enforcement. The clear lesson is that empowering tribes to deal with the challenges they face and that
taking advantage of the available opportunities will result in tribal comrnunities that thrive. The United
States is therefore pleased to support the Declaration's callto promote the development of a new and

distinct international concept of self-determination specific to indigenous peoples. The Declaration's call
is to promote the development of a concept of self determination for indigenous peoples that is
different from the existing right of self determination in international law. The purpose of the
Declaration was not to change or define ttre existing right of selfdetermination under international iaw.
Further, as explained in Article 46, the Declaration does not imply any right to take any action that
would dismember or impair, totally or in part, the territorial integrity or political unity of sovereign and
independent States. For the United States, the Declaration's concept of self-determination is consistent
with the United States'existing recognition of, and relationship with, federally recognized tribes as
political entities that have inherent sovereign powers of self-gwernance. This recognition is the basis for
the special legal and plitical relationship, including the government-to-government relationship,
established between the United States and federally recognized tribes, pursuant to which the United
States supports, protects, and promotes tribal governrnental authority over a broad range of internal
and territorial affairs, including membership, culture, language, religion, education, information, social
welfare, community and public safety, family relations, economic activities, lands and resource

management, environment and entry by non-members, as well as ways and means for financing these
autonomous governmentalfunctions. Federal agencies are engaged in a wide range of activities to
enhance tribal self determination in areas crucial to the well-being of tribal mernbers. The Department
of Justice (DOJ), for example, is deeply committed to strengthening tribal police and judicial systems.