Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Arranged By :
Andi Dermawan
PREFACE
Thank to Almighty God who has given His bless to the writer for finishing the
final project of semantics. The writer also wish to express his deep and sincere
gratitude for those who have guided in completing this paper.
The author realizes that in the preparation of this paper is still far from
perfection . Therefore , criticism and suggestions that are build so we expected from
all parties for the perfection of our next paper . The author also hopes this paper can
be useful for readers.
Bulukumba, January 2016
Writer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER.............................................................................................
PREFACE.......................................................................................... i
TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................ii
CHAPTER I......................................................................................1
Background...........................................................................................1
Problem Statements..............................................................................1
CHAPTER II.....................................................................................2
General Definition................................................................................2
Speech Act Theory By J.L. Austin........................................................2
Speech Act Theory By Searle...............................................................5
When Speech Act Is Successful............................................................6
CHAPTER III....................................................................................7
Conculusion..........................................................................................7
APPENDIX.......................................................................................9
CHAPTER I
A. Background
Language is a social interaction tool or a tool of human
communication. In any human communication that can convey information to
each other in the form of thoughts, ideas, intentions, feelings, and emotions
directly. According to the real experience, the language it always appears in
the form of individual speech acts or behavior. Therefore each study the
structure of the language should be started from the assessment of speech acts.
Speech act is a concrete manifestation of the functions of language, which is
the basis of pragmatic analysis (Rahardi, 2005).
Speech act is the individual psychological symptoms and sustainability
are determined by the language ability of speakers in a given situation. In a
speech act is seen in meaning or action in the utter. The sentence "Here is very
hot!" May have various meanings in different situations. Could be, the
speaker simply stating the fact that the current state of the air, asking others to
open the windows or turn on the air conditioner, or even a grievance /
complaint. Therefore, the ability of sociolinguistics, including the
understanding of speech acts is indispensable in communicating because
human will often faced with the need to understand and use different types of
speech acts, where each type can be realized through a variety of strategies.
There are several prominent figures related to speech act theory, Mass J.L.
Austin, J.R. Searle, G.N. Leech, and L.P. Grice.
B. Problem Statement
1. General Definition of Speech Act
2. Speech Act Theory by Austin
3. Speech Act theory by Searle
4. When speech act is successful ?
CHAPTER II
(Discussion)
1
determining the truth conditions for such statements as "I promise to do soand-so."
Austin pointed out that we use language to do things as well as to
assert things, and that the utterance of a statement like "I promise to do soand-so" is best understood as doing something making a promise rather than
making an assertion about anything. Hence the name of one of his best-known
works How to Do Things with Words.
Austin (1962) states that the speech act is an act that appears when
utter something. Austin distinguish speech act analysis into three parts:
1. Locutionary Act, take action to say something. Locutions action contains
the literal sense. A locutionary act has to do with the simple act of a
speaker saying something, i.e. the act of producing a meaningful linguistic
expression. It consists of three sub-acts. they are (i) a phonic act of
producing an utterance-inscription, (ii) a phatic act of composing a
particular linguistic expression in a particular language, and (iii) a rhetic
act of contextualizing the utterance-inscription.
Example:
Boss
: Under cover? This is not your private army. Is she OK?
Dalziel
: She's good. In fact she spent half her childhood on a horse.
In the speech above there are some locutions, such Under cover? This is
not your private army. Is she OK?. Forms sentence consists of two
interrogative sentence and one sentence negative.
Locutions of speech Dalziel is She's good. In fact she spent half her
childhood on a horse. The form is positive.
2. Illocutionary Act, In speech-act theory, an illocutionary act is the way in
which a sentence is used to express an attitude with a certain function or
"force" (called illocutionary force).
A direct illocutionary act is performed when a speaker utters a certain
meaningful sentence (correctly, literally, etc.) with certain intentions. For
example, I directly assert that rocks are hard when I use the English
sentence 'Rocks are hard' with the intention of describing rocks as being
hard. I directly direct my addressee to come home when I use the English
CHAPTER III
(Conclusion)
In everyday communication, a variety of different Speech Acts are used.
Without being linguists, usually people are able understand what the speaker wants to
say. Speech acts reveal the intentions of speakers and the effects the speakers
utterances and expressions have on the hearers. In brief when speakers are saying
words, they not only produce utterance containing words and grammatical structure,
but they also perform action in those utterances.
REFERENCES
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mizu, Ambar. Tindak Tutur (Austin dan Searle).
https://ambarmizu2013.wordpress.com/sosiolingusitik-tindak-tutur-austin-dan-searle/
(diakses tanggal 19 Januari 2017)
Dewi, Diana Melisa. Penggunaan speech act (tindak tutur).
http://derraparindra.blogspot.co.id/2010/12/speech-acts-tindak-tutur-by-diana.html
(diakses tanggal 19 Januari 2017)
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
8