Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
EDIT 720
The authors discussed what the three phases of instructional design are. They are analysis,
strategy, and evaluation (Smith & Ragan, 1999, p. 7). The three categories are intertwined with
one another. It is not a linear approach (Smith & Ragan, 1999, p. 8). It was mentioned in the
article that when selecting the best instructional strategy, it is good to select the best one for
learning concepts (Smith & Ragan, 1999, p. 8). Having consistency is important in producing
results in education. Faulty congruence happens and as the designers, that falls into our hands.
There are advantages of systematic instructional design. Some of those advantages are:
encourages the advocacy of a learner, facilitates congruency with objectives, activities, and
assessment, and helps with learning problems (Smith & Ragan, 1999, pgs. 8-9). However, some
limitations to instructional design are the learning goals and particular goals cannot be identified
beforehand (Smith & Ragan, 1999, p. 9). Trainers and teachers could be identified as some
designers. Using the systematic instructional design process, enhances learning in many different
ways (Smith & Ragan, 1999, p. 11).
#4: Smith & Ragan (1999). Foundations of Instructional Design. Instructional Design (pp. 1329). New York: Wiley.
The authors discuss philosophy and theory in Instructional Design. One of the reasons for
studying philosophy and theory is that it helps designers understand why they make the decisions
they do (Smith & Ragan, 1999, p. 14). There are three different philosophical perspectives of
instructional design. They are constructivism, empiricism, and pragmatism.
Constructivism is categorized into a larger category of philosophies. In that philosophy it is,
the belief that reason is the primary source of knowledge and that reality is constructed rather
than discovered. (Smith & Ragan, 1999, p. 15). There is individual constructivism, social
constructivism, and contextualism. A misinterpretation of constructivism is when learners are
engaged and enthusiastic they are learning (Smith & Ragan, 1999, p. 17). This is not true.
Learners may not even have an idea of what the learning goal was.
Empiricism is when knowledge is obtained by experience (Smith & Ragan, 1999, p. 17).
Pragmatism could be considered in between constructivism and empiricism (Smith & Ragan,
1999, p. 17). Pragmatists also believe knowledge is obtained by experience, but also that
knowledge is interpreted by reason (Smith & Ragan, 1999, p. 17).
There were different theories mentioned: learning theories, cognitive learning theories,
developmental theories, and instructional theories.
#5: Anderson, S., Yu-Chang, H., & Kinney, J. (2016). Using Importance-Performance Analysis to
Guide Instructional Design of Experiential Learning Activities. Online Learning, 20(4), 33-47.
I selected this article because after reading about the different theories that played a role in the
instructional design process in Smith & Ragan (1999), I gained an interest in the topic. In this
article it focuses on experiential learning. In this theory it focus on the holistic approach for
learning. John Dewey was also mentioned in the text about how he developed a philosophy of
education. Kolbs experiential learning theory was based off of Dewey and Piagets approach.
EDIT 720
What I discovered in this article was that Kolbs theory had four learning activities. Those
learning activities were concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization,
and active experimentation (Anderson, Yu-Chang, & Kinney, 2016, p. 35). In the article, there
was a study completed on online experiential learning. The study was successful and students
were able to connect classroom concepts to the real world (Anderson, Yu-Chang, & Kinney,
2016, p. 42).
There were some limitations in the study that could have hindered the results. Those limitations
were sample size and that the course students were taking (Anderson, Yu-Chang, & Kinney,
2016, p. 43).