Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Paul Rosenberg
How to Be One
of the Good Guys
It started with an article of ours entitled, The Good Guys are NOT Coming to Save Us, in which I wrote
the following:
A lot of Americans know that the US government is out of control. Anyone who has cared
enough to study the US Constitution even a little knows this. Still, very few of these people
are taking any significant action, and largely because of one error: They are waiting for the
good guys to show up and fix things.
Some think that certain groups of politicians will pull it together and fix things, or that one
magnificent politician will ride in to fix things. Others think that certain members of the
military will step in and slap the politicians back into line. And, Im sure there are other
variations.
There are several problems with this. Ill start with the small issues:
It doesnt happen. A lot of good people have latched on to one grand possibility
after another, waiting for a good guy to save the day, and it just doesnt happen.
Thousands of hours of reading, writing and waiting are burned with each new
great light who comes along with a promise to run the system in the right way,
and give us liberty and truth. (Or whatever.) Lots of decent folks grab on to one
pleasant dream after another, only to end up right back where they started but
poorer in time, energy and finances.
Hope is a scam. Its a dream of someday, somehow, getting something for nothing.
People who hope do not act they wait for other people to act. Hope is a tool to
neuter a natural opposition: they sit and hope, and never act against you. Even the
biblical meaning of hope is something more like expectation (or sometimes waiting)
than the modern use of hope.
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 1
Paul Rosenberg
Petitioning an abuser for compassion. The good guys are considered to be a few
people inside the abusive government. But if the good guys were really good,
wouldnt they have dissociated themselves with an abuser some time ago? By
pleading for the good guys to rise up, people are asking one sub-group of the abusers
to save them from the rest of the abusers. However, they all work for the same
operation; they all get paid out of the same offices; according to the same rulebook.
And if the good guys were so willing to turn against their employers, why would they
have waited until now?
Movies. We all grew up in the company of movie heroes who rode in at the last
minute to save the noble victims. From John Wayne to Star Trek to Bruce Willis, the
story line differs little. These are pleasant stories, of course, but cinema is not reality,
and hoping for it to become reality is something that we should get over prior to
adulthood. But, as I say, those are the smaller issues. Lets move on to the serious
ones.
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 2
Paul Rosenberg
Washington DC was unleashed with Marbury v. Madison. What made it almighty was the
17th Amendment of 1913, which took the powers of the states and transferred them to
Washington, by mandating the popular election of senators.
With senators being elected directly by the populace, the states were entirely cut-out of the
equation. In their place, political parties gained massive power, and nearly all power was
consolidated in the city of Washington.
And so it is today. Washington is an unfettered beast. The system will NOT fix itself; the
mechanisms to do that were lost a long time ago.
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 3
Paul Rosenberg
That message seemed to resonate with many people as more resources for free thinkers picked it up
from lewrockwell.com to alt-market.com, to fromthetrenchesworldreport.com to zerohedge.com.
And while it was gratifying to see my work spread throughout the Internet, it also raised a lot of
questions about the crucial follow-up about the DOING.
After all, if there are no Good Guys riding in to save us, then it falls to us to act on behalf of ourselves
and our families. And that is what we must do. But acting is of no value unless we act in ways that will
get us what we want. Not just any action will do. And in order to act correctly, we have to understand
our situation.
Unfortunately, the world we live in is very confusing. Even those people who try the hardest to figure it
all out come to wildly different conclusions. Their problem is not that they are lazy or stupid or ignorant
(usually they are none of the above), it's that they are focused on the daily outrages and the current
loud debates.
What we need most in a situation like this is perspective. It's very hard to understand the movement of a
hurricane while you are inside of it; you have to look at it from a great distance like a satellite view to
understand it.
And it precisely that type of satellite view that we can get from something that I call the Great
Calendar
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 4
Paul Rosenberg
Imagine what life would be like if the seasons were each 400 years long, instead of a few months. We
might spend all of our lives in winter, following our parents and grandparents, eight generations deep,
who all lived the same way. We almost certainly would not have progressed into an informed, scientific
age.
In all likelihood, most people would consider stories of warm ages to be myths. We would also think that
our problems with shivering and frostbite were due to our own inadequacies, not being suited to nature.
People who said, its not our bodies that are maladapted, it's the world that's out of season would be
ridiculed and called crazy.
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 5
Paul Rosenberg
With no great calendar to refer to, we would be living in a state of permanent confusion, unsure of why
we were unsuited to the world and tending to blame ourselves... until an effective calendar came along,
of course. Then we would be able to see where we were in the cycle, and to make sense of our lives in
this world.
The odd diagram you see above is that great calendar. The seasons are those of civilization, not of
weather, but the effects upon us are almost the same. The great value of this calendar is this:
Once you know where you are on the calendar,
the world around you finally makes sense.
The inner ring shows the dominating concerns or responses of individuals at the various stages
of the cycle.
The middle ring shows the changes in institutions (states, kingdoms, dominating religions) at the
various stages of the cycle.
The outer ring shows the stages of an entropy cycle (explained below) that correspond to the
stages of the other rings.
There's nothing new about cycles of civilization, by the way: The best historians almost always have
theories on the cycles of history. It's actually hard to avoid; the parallels jump out at you as you read the
histories of Rome, or Greece, or Sumer, or others.
The stages of civilizations that the historians have defined tend to be very similar, and the middle ring of
this chart is not terribly different from those.
By adding the other two rings, however, we can see the underlying mechanism that creates the pattern,
and that makes a big difference. Once you understand why history moves as it does, you know in
advance what is likely to occur; you can protect yourself and even profit from the changes.
If you understand, you can use history as a tool.
If you do not understand, history is a series of surprises that happen to you.
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 6
Paul Rosenberg
What Entropy Is
The real key to understanding this civilizational cycle is the fact that it is an entropy cycle,
operating like an engine that runs on heat.
Entropy is the dispersal of energy. It is not a loss
of energy; it's a dispersion of energy.
When ice is dropped into a glass of warm water,
the temperature difference between the water
and the ice can be used by a properly constructed motor to perform work. But as the ice
melts, the amount of work that can be extracted from the temperature difference
decreases, until the temperature evens out and no further work can be obtained. We then
say that entropy in the glass has increased.
The motor would work like this:
RECHARGE: Drop ice into the glass.
WORK: The motor turns.
ENTROPY: The ice melts, the temperature evens out and the motor slows down.
FAILURE: The motor stops and work stops.
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 7
Paul Rosenberg
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 8
Paul Rosenberg
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 9
Paul Rosenberg
Systemic breakdown
As the civilization approaches breakdown, corruption and rot are
clearly seen and a few defections from the shared schema of
meaning occur. But, these defections are few; most people hold
tightly to the self-esteem of identification with the empire. They
find reasons to claim that the old virtues still mean something.
Rather than facing the rot of the whole, people prefer to blame
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 10
Paul Rosenberg
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 11
Paul Rosenberg
These two irrefutable facts lie at the heart of the entropy cycle, which arises from the interactions
between individuals and institutions.
Think of individual will as the proverbial square peg, and institutions as the proverbial round hole. The
two do not fit together naturally. Forcing the square peg into a round hole will always tend to damage
the square peg.
Insects, like bees, are naturally suited to institutional living; humans are not. The proof of this is found in
the things people complain about. While human complaints are massively varied, you will find, if you
examine them, that a high percentage are reactions to institutionally-ordered or institutionallyinfluenced things that people find insulting or irritating.
Individuals and institutions are not fully compatible. Forcing the two together causes problems, and
that's what drives the entropy cycle of civilizations. These are simple factors, but they play themselves
out in billions of lives every day. That gives them incredible power.
At the beginning of the great cycle (the Recharge phase), individual will is unrestrained and human
energy functions freely. This is followed by production. (The Work phase.) As institutions form and grow,
however, they limit human will and energy. (Entropy phase.) When institutions grow massive, they
choke human energy until the civilization grinds to a halt. (Failure phase.)
All productive energy in our world comes, ultimately, through humans. Certainly we have learned to use
animals and fuels to obtain raw power, but those sources are only of value when individual humans
decide to make use of them. Someone must train and feed the horse. Individuals must decide to get out
of bed in the morning and dig oil wells, build and maintain pipelines, run refineries, deliver gasoline, and
so on. Remove individual will from the equation and everything falls down.
People who run institutions like to see humans as groups, but in reality, all that exist are individuals.
These individuals may be convinced to act together, but each of them must make his or her choice,
every morning, as to what they will do.
Here are two very simple and very true statements about human energy. They cannot be ignored by any
accurate model of human life:
#1: All humans operate individually. I have an overflow of sensory input from my own body and
none from yours. The same happens to you. No amount of training, or guilt, or coercion will ever
change that we're supposed to be this way. We are individuals by structure.
#2: All creativity all goodness comes from the individual. I think my own set of thoughts and
compare them to my own mental database; you do the same. We may cooperate and
communicate with each other, but every valuable idea must form separately in each mind.
To this, we must add just one further statement:
If the production of individuals is reduced, the production of the whole is reduced.
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 12
Paul Rosenberg
Output can never, ever, be greater than input. If we restrain or damage the output of individuals, the
output of the whole must fall also.
Creating Entropy
The situation we are describing is this:
All productive energy comes through individual humans, but those humans are forced to
operate inside of institutions, and this creates entropy.
Our hypothesis here is that human energy is dispersed and nullified by institutions. Let's see how that
happens, starting with this: Hierarchy non-local control always causes entropy.
Merely handing information and orders back and forth wastes enormous amounts of time and energy.
These losses are obvious, but there are more important types of entropy:
The entropy of will, via hierarchy. Inside any institution, our willful actions are restricted. But in
institutions, our wills are not limited by natural forces like gravity; they are limited by the wills of
other people. We all know what this is like; it's insulting and demoralizing. Most of us were
forced to accept this arrangement before we were able to object very much, but the effects
continue all the same: we are far more reluctant to use our will than we should be; it is
instinctively frightening to us.
The entropy of cooperation, via power structures. Humans interact exceedingly well as
individuals. We can consider each other's preferences, strengths and weaknesses, and each
other's current emotional states. By having an independent view of the goal, we can interpret
the words of our coworkers and fill in blanks. In other words, we enjoy very rich
communications. Within hierarchy, however, that communication is stripped, almost bare, every
time it passes from one level to another.
The entropy of discovery, via enforced memorization. There is a radical difference between the
person who discovers things and the one who has facts forced upon him or her. Discovery is
thrilling and encouraging, creating a virtuous cycle. Forced learning causes frustration, the
surrender of will, or both. By replacing the thrill of discovery, rigid systems drain human energy
and cause mass entropy.
The entropy of intellectual partnering. Since humans are thinking, willful beings, keeping them
together requires more than fences and orders it requires the institution to influence the
minds of its people. In particular, it needs those people to identify with the institution; to see it
as necessary and right. If the institution fails to do this, enforcing the collection of fees and other
forms of cooperation is too expensive to sustain. So, institutions always establish themselves as
intellectual partners with their people. This restrains more productive avenues of thought.
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 13
Paul Rosenberg
The entropy of systemic rigidity. Because institutions must be considered legitimate by their
people, they are slow to adapt. Because their way, is held to be good, right, and inevitable
(why else would people sacrifice treasure and blood to protect it?), it cannot be changed.
Altering a sacred structure calls its sacredness into question. Important adaptations are
disallowed.
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 14
Paul Rosenberg
Get to know your neighbors: A strong local group of neighbors to help you when needed (and
you providing help when needed) can pay huge dividends to everyone involved.
Get involved with the local community: Volunteer if needed and get to know the producers in
your community. In times of trouble, the stronger the local community, the greater the chances
youll come of it alright.
Invest locally: When possible, allocate a certain percentage of your portfolio to helping local
businesses that are already established and need a small amount of capital for expansion to
buy new machinery or other capital goods that can be used as collateral. Not only does it
strengthen your bond with local business owners (the producers), but it gives you some safety in
case the worlds major financial institutions start wobbling (remember MFGlobal?).
Mentally step out of the consumer culture we live in: Turn off the TV and go outside. Read
books and visit websites that support the bigger person inside of you not the ones that pander
to our animal-instinct emotions like fear and worry.
Mere talk, however impressive, will not work; you must live differently. That is how we break out of the
cycle. We must use our own energy, our own way. And you cannot do that inside the institutions.
The great examples of this were the early Christians. They didn't fight Rome; they simply stopped living
Rome's way. They didn't try to reform Rome; they ignored it and lived their own way, convincing other
men and women one at a time that there was a different and better way to live.
These people were not reforming anything except themselves. They endlessly repeated phrases like
our kingdom is not of this world. They were stepping outside of the cycle and living a new way.
This idea of separation is found throughout the entire Judeo-Christian tradition, by the way. Abraham,
for example, was ordered to leave everything he had ever known and to start a new way.
What really changes the world is active, individual will will that does not sacrifice itself to institutions.
To pull ourselves out of the civilizational cycle, we must withdraw and be different. If we do not do this,
we will be dragged down with the masses.
The Great Calendar is accurate, and the decline of our time will be no different than those which
preceded it, save for the details. The choice is either to remain inside the cycle or to step outside of it.
Whether or not that is pleasant, it is what history teaches.
I leave you with a thought from one of the great, unappreciated philosophers of our time:
The meaning of life is that it is to be lived, and it is not to be traded and conceptualized and
squeezed into a pattern of systems.
-- Bruce Lee
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 15
Paul Rosenberg
http://www.freemansperspective.com/letters/join-freemans-perspective.php
Freemans Perspective is unlike any paid newsletter I subscribe to. It isnt full of the usual
investment ideas and get-rich schemes. It is, however, full of unbelievably interesting and
heavily researched insights pulled from the pages of history. And by better understanding
history, philosophy, and politics, you can form a better personal foundation upon which to
build wealth in your life in a truly enlightened way. Its worth every penny.
Jeff Berwick, Founder, The Dollar Vigilante
Free-Man's Perspective is not only totally sound, but it's both entertaining and instructive. I
read every issue.
Doug Casey, Best-selling Author and International Speculator
I enjoy reading Free-Man's Perspective immensely. Paul Rosenberg has an encyclopedic
knowledge of history, along with the communication skills to apply historical lessons to
today's world.
Mark Nestmann, LL.M. International Tax Law,
President, The Nestmann Group, Ltd.
www.FreemansPerspective.com
Page 16