You are on page 1of 1

The trial court found Michelle's testimony to be straightforward, credible and truthful.

We find no
reason to overturn that conclusion and to withhold credence from the testimony of Michelle. We note
that, at her mother's instance, Michelle underwent physical examination at the hands of a physician.
The results of the medical examination conducted upon her are consistent with the charge that she
had been sexually assaulted. The medical certificate sets out the following findings:
Fresh blood oozing from vagina
Hymen with hematoma, laceration fresh at 7, 9, and 3:00 o'clock position with
moderate amount of bleeding
vaginal smear for spermatozoa, negative. 5
The physician who had examined testified in court to the following effect:
FISCAL DE JESUS: (DIRECT EXAMINATION)
Q What might have been the cause of this hematoma, what object,
for example?
DOCTOR MEDY AUXILLOS:
A Any blunt instrument that could introduce force in that area could
cause hematoma.
Q You consider man's penis as an instrument that could cause that
hematoma?
A Yes, Sir.
xxx xxx xxx
Q And what might be the probable cause of these lacerations in those
different positions?
A That might have been caused by a blunt object inserted in the
vagina.
Q And man's penis could be a probable cause for these lacerations?
A Yes, Sir. 6