Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Reference Standard:
AS9100
Product Assessment
This Product Audit has been conducted by Fairchild Controls to determine the extent of product conformity demonstrated by the supplier
based on criteria selected from the SAE Aerospace Standard, AS9100. Fairchild Controls has assessed the capability and readiness of
the Suppliers Production Management Process and its ability to ensure compliant product in accordance with Purchase Order
requirements. We have evaluated the effectiveness of the manufacturing processes and their ability to meet these specified objectives.
During this audit we have reviewed the Quality Management System, Process Documentation, Manufacturing Processes and Process
Controls directly related to Fairchild Controls product. The following audit results have been reviewed with the suppliers authorized
representative.
Audit Participants
Names & Titles
General Information
Supplier ID No.
Supplier Name
Street Address
City
State
Zip Code
Phone
Fax
Active P/N
Description
Inspection Codes
SF-QA079 7/11
Page 1 of 10
(ASAP Checklist)
Dynamics Reviewed:
Significant/Applicable Revisions to the Suppliers Process Management System
Comment:
Summary Results:
- - Opportunities for Improvement
- - Observations
(PC)
Partially Compliant A significant number of process indicators are compliant, however some indicators
fail to meet expectations
(NC)
Not Compliant A significant number of process indicators are not compliant and no appropriate actions are
being taken or planned. Overall process controls fail to meet expectations.
(N/A)
The noted process indicator is not applicable to the product manufactured for Fairchild Controls
Audit Findings:
Strengths
SF-QA079 7/11
Page 2 of 10
(ASAP Checklist)
Nonconformance:
When, during the audit, conditions are identified that indicate the requirements of the Standard are not fully compliant, the nonconforming condition
shall be included in this report and documented on a Corrective Action Request (CAR) in accordance with GEN-QAI1401. The nonconformance will
be classified according to risk, as Major or Minor. Observations will be documented in this report for follow-up at a later date.
Major Nonconformance:
The requirement has not been met. Evidence indicates one or more of the following:
Systemic failure of the Management System
Condition could result in the delivery of nonconforming product
Condition could result in the failure or reduced usability of product or service
Major Findings
Minor Nonconformance:
The requirement has not been fully met. Evidence indicates one or more of the following:
a. Non-Systemic, not likely to result in the failure of the Management System
b. Condition is an isolated occurrence
Minor Findings
Observations:
The requirement has been marginally met. No corrective action is required at this time. Follow-up in this specific area is required during the next audit period or as indicated in this section
of the report to ensure stability of the process.
Observations
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Comments:
SF-QA079 7/11
Page 3 of 10
Not Applicable
Description
Do Not Comply
Claus
e
Partially Compliant
Fully Compliant
(ASAP Checklist)
PC
NC
N/A
Comments
Work Instructions
Which of the following did the supplier indicate on their last Fairchild
Quality Management System Survey:
General
Info
General
Info
4.2.3
4.2.3
4.2.3
4.2.3
4.2.1d
4.2.1d
N/A
SF-QA079 7/11
Page 4 of 10
(ASAP Checklist)
Other:
4.2.1d
7.5.1b
4.2.1d
7.5.1k
4.2.3a,
b, &
5.5.1
7. Has the supplier provided Fairchild with a copy of their most current
drawing
7.2.1
9. Are all Fairchild dwg requirements, dwg notes, and specs incorporated
correctly into the suppliers work instructions
7.5.1b
10. Are the work instructions available to the person performing the task
7.5.1g
8.3
8.3
4.2.1
Best
Practice
4.2.3
4.2.1c,
7.5.1a
&b
7.4.2
7.4.3
7.4.3a
Purchased Materials
14. Does the suppliers PO capture and flow down all applicable
Fairchild requirements to sub-tier suppliers, including inspection codes,
and M&TE
15. Does the supplier provide applicable PO requirements to R/I and
does objective evidence indicate sub-tier suppliers product is compliant
16. Does the supplier maintain objective evidence of the quality of
product from sub-tier suppliers, i.e., documentation, C of C, test reports,
etc.
Outside Processes
7.4.1
7.4.2
19. Does the supplier maintain objective evidence that their outside
processors services meet all applicable requirements
7.4.3 &
8.2.4
Special Processes
6.2.2,
7.5.2, &
7.5.3
SF-QA079 7/11
Page 5 of 10
(ASAP Checklist)
6.2.2,
7.5.2, &
7.5.3
7.5.2 &
7.5.3
22. Are specific process materials, tools, and equipment stated in the
process instructions and are they used by the operator
7.5.2 &
7.5.3
7.5.2 &
7.5.3
4.2.3,
7.5.2, &
7.5.3
4.2.3,
7.5.2, &
7.5.3
4.2.3,
7.5.2, &
7.5.3
4.2.3,
7.5.2, &
7.5.3
7.5.2 &
7.5.3
7.5.2 &
7.5.3
7.5.2 &
7.5.3
7.5.2 &
7.5.3
7.5.2 &
7.5.3
7.5.2 &
7.5.3
7.5.2 &
7.5.3
7.2.1 &
8.4.2
7.2.1 &
8.4.2
Inspection Methods
8.2.4
8.2.4
7.2.1 &
8.4.2
SF-QA079 7/11
Page 6 of 10
(ASAP Checklist)
7.2.1 &
8.4.2
c. If one (1) reject is found in a lot is the entire lot inspected for that
defect
7.2.1 &
8.4.2
8.2.4.2
32. Are inspection records maintained for FAI to validate new parts or
following any subsequent change that invalidates the previous FAI result
33. Are all tools used for measuring the acceptance of product calibrated
a. If calibrated tools are being used, are they specified in the work
instructions
b. Are calibrated tools available when they are specified in the work
instructions
a. If special tools are being used, are they specified in the work
instructions
b. Are special tools available when they are specified in the work
instructions
37. Are cleaning processes sequenced for optimum benefit and are they
effective
6.4 &
7.6
SF-QA079 7/11
Page 7 of 10
(ASAP Checklist)
Best
Practice
7.5.1i
7.5.1i
41. Does the supplier have an implementation method that provides for
product effectivity of configuration changes
b. Do change notices describe how to implement the change for work-inprocess (WIP), and how is it handled
7.5.3
7.5.3
Product Controls
4.2.3g
4.3
7.5.1.2
4.2.3g
4.3
7.5.1.2
4.2.3g
4.3
7.5.1.2
4.2.3g
4.3
7.5.1.2
4.2.3c
4.2.3g
4.3
7.5.1.2
7.5.3
Best
Practice
7.1c &
7.5.1a
8.2.4
4.2.3
7.2.1a
45. Is the ATP in use approved in writing by Fairchild and is it on file with
Fairchild
46. Does the supplier have a standard method for preparing test
procedures and is it utilized
47. Is there a method of review, approval, and config control for test
procedures, changes to test procedures, and is the method utilized
6.2.2
49. Does the supplier have training and, when required, certification and
re-certification program for test personnel
6.2.2
50. Are ATPs performed only by trained and, when required, certified
test personnel
7.5.1a
&b
Test Procedures
Best
Practice
4.2.3
Best
Practice
SF-QA079 7/11
Page 8 of 10
(ASAP Checklist)
52. Does the test procedure specify all the equipment, special tools
and/or computers to be used
53. Is test software revision controlled and both the revision and name
are specified in the ATP
54. Does the test procedure specify the equipment accuracy for generic
M&TE, and meet Fairchilds PO requirement.
57. Do test data sheets contain the ATP #, Rev, P/N, S/N, test date,
testers stamp or signature, results of each parameter or functions tested,
and failure report #, if applicable
Best
Practice
59. Does the test data sheet format utilize mistake proofing
Best
Practice
Best
Practice
Best
Practice
Best
Practice
4.2.3
60. Does the supplier protect the master CNC program, is a backup copy
maintained, and is access limited to only authorized personnel
7.5.1b
7.5.1b
7.5.1b
7.5.1c
7.5.1.3
7.5.1c
4.3
7.2.1a
7.1c &
8.2.4
8.3
7.5.3 &
8.2.4
4.2.1
66. Does the supplier protect the master CMM program, is a backup
copy maintained, and is access limited to only authorized personnel
SF-QA079 7/11
Page 9 of 10
(ASAP Checklist)
7.5.1b
7.5.1b
7.5.1b
7.5.1c
7.5.1.3
4.2.3
72. Does the supplier protect the master Test program, is a backup copy
maintained, and is access limited to only authorized personnel
7.5.1b
7.5.1b
7.5.1b
7.5.1c
7.5.1c
8.5.2
8.5.3
5.2.2d
8.5.2
8.5.3
5.2.2d
8.5.2
8.5.3
Test Software
SF-QA079 7/11
Page 10 of 10