BP Final Report

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF A SIX STORIED
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH THREE BEDROOM

FLATS
Bachelor of Technology Project (7th semester)
Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the Degree
of Bachelor of Technology in Civil Engineering
Submitted by:
Rohitashav Agarwal (13-1-1-057)
Mrigakshee Sarmah (13-1-1-058)
Bhawarnab Gautam (13-1-1-059)
Brijesh Singh Satyal (13-1-1-060)
Under the supervision of
Dr. M. L. Vara Prasad, Assistant Professor
Dr. Debjit Bhowmik, Assistant Professor
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, SILCHAR
DECEMBER 2016
Department of Civil Engineering

National Institute of Technology, Silchar
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the project entitled Analysis and Design of a six storied
Residential Building with Three Bedroom Flats submitted for the partial
fulfilment of the award of the Degree for Bachelor of Technology in Civil
Engineering, under the Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of
Technology, Silchar, has been carried out by the undersigned students of 7 th
semester, B. Tech, under the supervision and guidance of Dr. M. L. Vara Prasad
and Dr. Debjit Bhowmik.
Rohitashav Agarwal (13-1-1-057)
Mrigakshee Sarmah (13-1-1-058)
Bhawarnab Gautam (13-1-1-059)
Brijesh Singh Satyal (13-1-1-060)

Certified that the above work has been carried out under my supervision.
Dr. Upendra Kumar

Head of the Department
Dr. M. L. Vara Prasad

Assistant Professor
Dr. Debjit Bhowmik

Assistant Professor

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the faculty members of Civil
Engineering Department for their kind support and guidance in the execution
and completion of the project.
We are highly indebted to Dr. M. L. Vara Prasad and Dr. Debjit Bhowmik for
their supervision and assistance in every step of the project. We are greatly
obliged to Dr. Upendra Kumar, Head of the Department, Civil Engineering, for
his constant support and guidance.
We sincerely acknowledge the help extended by our friends in the completion
of the project.
Rohitashav Agarwal
Mrigakshee Sarmah
Bhawarnab Gautam
Brijesh Singh Satyal

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Load calculation for beams for live load
Table 2: Fixed end moments on beams for LL
Table 3: Calculation of Distribution Factors for beams
Table 4: Calculation of Distribution Factors for columns
Table 5: Maximum negative moments at supports for LL
Table 6: Positive moment at mid span of beams for LL
Table 7: Maximum moments in columns for LL
Table 8: Shear force in beams for LL

Table 9: Axial forces in columns for LL
Table 10: Load calculation for beams for dead load
Table 11: Fixed end moments on beams for DL
Table 12: Negative moments at supports for DL
Table 13: Positive moment at mid span for DL
Table 13: Moments in columns for DL
Table 14: Shear force in beams for DL
Table 15: Axial forces in columns for DL
Table 16: Calculation of earthquake lateral loads
Table 17: Seismic load Analysis for Frame 1
Table 18: Calculation of axial forces in columns for seismic load
Table 19: Calculation of pressure coefficients for wind load
Table 20: Analysis for Frame 2for wind load
Table 30: Maximum Live Load values
Table 31: Maximum Dead Load values
Table 32: Maximum Seismic Load Values
Table 33: Maximum Wind Load Values
Table 34: Load combinations for beams at roof level
Table 35: Load combinations for 5th floor beams

Table 37: Load combinations for 3rd floor beams
Table 38: Load combinations for 2nd floor beams
Table 39: Load combinations for 1st floor beams
Table 40: Load Combinations for 6th storey columns
Table 43: Load Combinations for 3rd storey columns
Table 44: Load Combinations for 2nd storey columns
Table 45: Load Combinations for 1st storey columns
Table 46: Table showing primary load cases for Staad Pro
Table 47: Combination load cases for Staad Pro
Table 48: Table showing reaction envelopes

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Diagram showing Building Plan
Figure 2: Diagram showing Front View Elevation of Building
Figure 3(a): Diagram showing Side View Elevation of Building
Figure 3(b): Diagram showing Beam Column Layout
Figure 4(a): Detailing diagram for slab S1 (Roof Level)
Figure 4(b): Detailing diagram of slab S2 (Roof Level)
Figure 4(c): Detailing diagram of Slab S3 (Roof Level)
Figure 4(d): Detailing diagram of Slab S4 (Roof Level)
Figure 4(e): Detailing diagram for Slab S5 (Roof Level)
Figure 4(f): Detailing diagram of Slab S6 (Roof Level)
Figure 4(g): Detailing diagram of slab S7 (Roof Level)
Figure 4(h): Detailing diagram of Slab S8 (Roof Level)
Figure 4(i): Detailing diagram of Slab S9 (Roof Level)
Figure 5(a): Detailing diagram of Slab S1 (Intermediate Floor Level)
Figure 5(b): Detailing diagram of Slab S2 (Intermediate Floor Level)
Figure 5(c): Detailing diagram of Slab S3 (Intermediate Floor Level)
Figure 5(d): Detailing diagram for Slab S4 (Intermediate Floor Level).
Figure 5(e): Detailing diagram of Slab S5 (Intermediate Floor Level)
Figure 5(f): Detailing diagram of Slab S6 (Intermediate Floor Level)
Figure 5(g): Detailing diagram of Slab S7 (Intermediate Floor Level)
Figure 5(h): Detailing diagram of Slab S8 (Intermediate Floor Level)
Figure 5(i): Detailing diagram of Slab S9 (Intermediate Floor Level)
Figure 6(a): Bending Moment diagram for Live Load in beams (Frame 1)
Figure 6(b): Bending Moment diagram for Live Load in columns (Frame 1)
Figure 6(c): Shear Force diagram for Live Load in beams (Frame 1)
Figure 7(a): Bending Moment diagram for Dead Load in beams (Frame 1)
Figure 7(b): Bending Moment diagram for Dead Load in columns (Frame 1)

Figure 7(c): Shear Force diagram for Dead Load in columns (Frame 1)
Figure 8(a): Diagram showing Lateral Forces acting on Frame 1(Seismic Load)
Figure 8(b): Diagram showing Lateral Forces acting on Frame 2 (Seismic
Load)
Figure 8(c): Diagram showing Bending Moment acting on beams and columns
for Frame 1 (Seismic Load)
Figure 8(d): Diagram showing Bending Moment acting on beams and columns
for Frame 2 (Seismic Load)
Figure 8(e): Diagram showing Shear Force acting on beams for Frame 1
(Seismic Load)
Figure 8(f): Diagram showing Shear Force acting on beams for Frame 2
(Seismic Load)
Figure 9(a): Diagram showing Lateral Wind Load acting on Frame 2 (Wind
Load)
Figure 9(b): Diagram showing Bending Moment acting on beams and columns
for Frame 2 (Wind Load)
Figure 9(c): Diagram showing Shear Force acting on beams for Frame 2 (Wind
Load)
Figure 10(a): Cross section of roof level beam
Figure 10(b): Beam Column Junction at roof level
Figure 10(c): Cross section of intermediate level beam
Figure 10(d): Beam Column Junction at roof level
Figure 10(e): Cross section of intermediate level beam
Figure 10(f): Beam Column Junction at roof level
Figure 11(a): Cross section of 6th storey column
Figure 11(b): Beam Column Junction of 6th Storey columns
Figure 11(c): Cross section of 5th storey column
Figure 11(d): Beam Column Junction of 5th Storey columns
Figure 11(e): Cross sectional area of 4th storey column
Figure 11(f): Beam Column Junction of 4th storey column

Figure 11(g): Cross section of 3rd storey column

Figure 11(h): Beam Column Junction of 3rd storey columns
Figure 11(i): Cross section of 2nd storey column
Figure 11(j): Beam Column Junction of 2nd storey columns
Figure 11(k): Cross section of 1st storey column
Figure 11(l): Beam Column Junction of 1st storey columns
Figure 12(a): Figure showing plan of staircase
Figure 12(b): Figure showing first flight of stairs
Figure 12(c): Figure showing second flight of stairs
Figure 13(a): Figure showing Plan of Raft Footing
Figure 13(b): Figure showing cross section of Raft Footing
Figure A1: Front View of Staad Pro Design
Figure A2: Top View of Staad Pro Design

CONTENTS
ABSTRACT.................................................................................1
INTRODUCTION........................................................................2
PRELIMINARY DESIGN DATA...............................................7
SLAB DESIGN............................................................................8
LIVE LOAD ANALYSIS............................................................80
DEAD LOAD ANALYSIS..........................................................85
SEISMIC ANALYSIS................................................................. 89
WIND LOAD ANALYSIS...........................................................94
LOAD COMBINATIONS............................................................97
BEAM DESIGN...........................................................................108
COLUMN DESIGN.....................................................................119
STAIRCASE DESIGN.................................................................141
FOOTING DESIGN.....................................................................145
STAAD PRO DESIGN.................................................................149
CONCLUSION ............................................................................159
REFERENCE................................................................................160
ANNEXURE I...............................................................................161

Page |1
ABSTRACT
The objective of this project is to plan, analyze and design a six storied
residential building with three bedroom flats. Assumptions are made as per the
requirements of the Indian Standard Codes. The load acting on the beams,
columns and frames are determined and the critical values obtained from load
combinations are utilized in the design of the building. The frames are analyzed
by moment distribution method. For seismic and wind analysis, portal method is
adopted. The design of components such as slabs, beams, columns, staircase
and footings are done by the Limit State Method of Design. The detailing shows
the placement of reinforcement in the various components.
The IS Codes used are IS 456: 2000 for Reinforced concrete design, IS: 875
(Part 3) 1987 for wind load design, IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002 for seismic load
design, SP 16: 1980 for steel requirements and IS 13920: 1993 for ductile
detailing.
Finally, the manual analysis done is compared with the analysis results of
STAAD Pro. The detailing of structural elements is done using Auto CAD.
Keywords: Reinforced concrete design, wind analysis, seismic analysis, load

combinations, moment distribution, portal frame, limit state method, STAAD
Pro.

Page |2
INTRODUCTION
Reinforced cement concrete occupies a leading position in the modern
construction of buildings, bridges and other similar structures. Due to the rising
population and excessive demand for land, it has become inevitable for both
residential as well as office purposes to opt for the construction of multi storied
buildings.
For multi storied buildings, the conventional load bearing structures become
uneconomical as they require larger sections to resist huge moments and loads.
But, in a framed structure, the building frame consists of a network of beams
and columns, which are built monolithically and rigidly at their joints. Because
of this rigidity at the joints, there will be reduction in moments and also the
structure tends to distribute the loads more uniformly and eliminate the
excessive effects of localised loads. Therefore in non-load bearing framed
structures, the moments and forces become less which in turn reduces the
sections of the members. As the walls dont take any load, they are also of
thinner dimensions. So, the lighter structural components and walls reduce the
self weight of the whole structure which necessitates a cheaper foundation.
Also, the lighter walls which can be easily shifted provide flexibility in space
utilisation. In addition to the above mentioned advantages the framed structure
is more effective in resisting wind loads and earthquake loads.
Work done in this project:
A plot of area of 300 m2 is considered for the construction of the residential
building. The load analysis and design has been carried out according to the
guidelines stated in IS 456: 2000 for Reinforced concrete design, IS: 875 (Part
3) 1987 for wind load design, IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2002 for seismic load design,
SP 16: 1980 for steel requirements and IS 13920: 1993 for ductile detailing.
Methods of design:
A reinforced concrete structure should be designed such that it fulfils its
intended purpose during its intended lifetime with:
1. Adequate safety, in terms of strength and stability.
2. Adequate serviceability, in terms of stiffness and durability.
3. Reasonable economy.
Commonly used methods of design of reinforced concrete structures are:
1. The Modular Ratio Method or the Working Stress Method
2. The Load Factor Method or the Ultimate Load Method
Page |3
3. The Limit State Method

Working Stress Method (WSM):
This method is based on linear elastic theory or classical elastic theory. This
method ensures adequate safety by suitably restricting the stresses in the
materials (concrete and steel) induced by the expected working loads on the
structure. The assumption of linear elastic behaviour is considered justifiable
since the specified permissible stresses are kept well below the ultimate strength
of the material. The ratio of yield stress of steel reinforcement or the cube
strength of concrete to the corresponding permissible or working stress is
usually called the factor of safety. The WSM uses a factor of safety of about 3
with respect to the cube strength of concrete and a factor of safety of about 1.8
with respect to the yield strength of steel.
Ultimate Load Method:
The ultimate load method (ULM) was developed as an alternative to the WSM.
The method is based on the ultimate strength of reinforced concrete at ultimate
load. The ultimate load is obtained by enhancing the service load by some factor
referred to as load factor for giving a desired margin of safety.
In the ULM method, stress condition at the state of impending collapse of the
structure is analysed, thus using the non linear stress strain curves of concrete
and steel. The safety measure in the design is obtained by the use of proper load
factor. This makes it possible to use different load factors under combined
loading conditions. However, satisfactory strength performance at ultimate
loads does not guarantee satisfactory serviceability performance at normal
service loads.
Limit State Method:
While the WSM gives satisfactory performance of the structure at working
loads, it is unsatisfactory at ultimate state of collapse. Similarly, while the ULM
provides a realistic assessment of safety, it does not guarantee the satisfactory
serviceability requirements at service loads. The limit state method is an ideal
method which takes into account not only the ultimate strength of the structure,
but also the serviceability and durability requirements. In the limit state method,
a structure is designed for safety against collapse and checked for serviceability
against working loads, thus rendering the structure fit for its intended use.
Page |4
All work done in the present project is based on the limit state method of
design.
Methods used in the Analysis of the Structure:
1. Moment Distribution Method
2. Method of Substitute Frames
3. Portal Frame Method
Moment Distribution Method:

The moment distribution method is a structural analysis method for the
structurally indeterminate beams and frames developed by Prof. Hardy Cross.
This method accounts for only flexural effects and ignores the shear and axial
effects.
Carry Over Theorem:
When a moment M is applied to produce rotation without translation at the near
supported end B of a beam whose far end A is fixed, the carry over moment Ma
at the farther end is one half of the applied moment M and is of the same sense
as that of the applied moment.
Stiffness of the member:
When a structural member of uniform section is subjected to a moment at one
end only, then the moment required so as to rotate that end to produce unit
slope, is called stiffness of the member.
The Distribution Theorem:
A moment which is applied to a structural joint to produce rotation without
translation gets distributed among the connecting members at the joint in the
same proportion as their stiffness.
Distribution Factor:
The distribution factor for a member at a joint is the ratio of the stiffness of the
member to the total stiffness of all the members meeting at that joint. In
mathematical terms, distribution factor of member k framed at joint j is given
by:

Page |5
=
=
Where, n is the number of members framed at the joint.
Substitute Frame Method (Two cycle Method):

In this method, only a part of the frame is considered for the analysis. The part
considered is called the substitute frame. The moments for each floor are
separately computed. It will be assumed that the moments transferred from one
floor to another are small. Each floor will be taken as connected to columns
above and below with their far ends fixed. The frame taken this way is analyzed
for the moments and shears in the beams and columns.
The moment distribution for the substitute frame is performed only for two
cycles, and hence, this method is sometimes referred to as the two cycle
method.
Portal Frame Method:
A frame is liable to be subjected to horizontal forces due to wind and seismic
effects. Such forces introduce direct loads on columns and bending moments in
all the members of the frame. Since these effects are small, an elaborate and
rigorous method of analysis is not required. Moments and shears due to the
above forces may be determined by approximate methods.
The approximate method used in this project is the portal frame method. The
assumptions involved are as follows:
1. Points of contraflexure occur at the middle points of the members of the
frame.
2. Horizontal shear taken by each interior column is double the horizontal
shear taken by each of the external columns.
Description of the Indian Standard Codes used in the project:
IS 456:2000 Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Practice is an Indian
Standard code of practice for general structural use of plain and reinforced
concrete. The latest revision of this standard was done in year 2000, reaffirmed
2005. This code uses the limit state design approach as well working stress
Page |6
design approach. It is written for use in India. It gives extensive information on

the various aspects of concrete.
It contains five sections and eight annexures:
Section 1: General
Section 2: Materials, Workmanship, Inspection and Testing
Section 3: General Design Considerations
Section 4: Special Design Requirements for Structural Members and
Systems
Section 5: Structural Design (Limit State Method)
IS: 875 (Part 3): 1987 deals with wind loads to be considered when designing
buildings, structures and components. This standard gives wind forces and their
effects (static and dynamic) that should be taken into account when designing
structures.
IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002 deals with assessment of seismic loads on various
structures and earthquake resistant design of buildings. Its basic provisions are
applicable to buildings, elevated structures, industrial and stack like structures,
bridges, concrete masonry and earth dams, embankments and retaining walls
and other structures.
SP 16: 1980: Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS: 456-1978 is a
structural practice handbook that has tables and charts that helps structural
engineers to rapidly design simple sections.
IS 13920: 1993 is the standard code which covers the requirements for
designing and detailing of monolithic reinforced concrete buildings so as to give
them adequate toughness and ductility to resist severe earthquake shocks
without collapse.
Figure for Building Plan is shown in Figure 1 of Annexure I.
Figure for Front View Elevation is shown in Figure 2 of Annexure I.
Figure for Side View Elevation is shown in Figure 3(a) of Annexure I.
Figure for Beam Column Layout is shown in Figure 3(b) of Annexure I.

Page |7
PRELIMINARY DESIGN DATA

The preliminary design data used in the design of the structure is summarized
below:
General Properties:
Size of plot:
10 m x 30 m
Type of building:
Residential Building
Type of structure:
6 storied RCC rigid jointed frame structure (G + 5)
Dimensions of walls:
Outer wall of thickness 300 mm and inner wall of
thickness 150 mm including plaster.
Earthquake load analysis:
According to IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002
Wind load analysis:
According to IS: 875 (Part 3) : 1987
Ductile detailing:
According to IS 13920: 1993
Seismic Zone:
Zone V
Wind Zone:
Wind speed 55 m/s on plain terrain.
Type of soil:
Medium soil
Safe bearing capacity of soil: At 1.5 m below ground level: 160 kN/m2.
Material Properties:
Grade of concrete:
M30
Type of steel :
HYSD of grade Fe 415
Geometric Properties:
Height of each floor:
3.3 m
Depth of slab:
120 mm for all floors including roof.
Column size:
400 mm x 400 mm
Beam size:
300 mm x 500 mm

Page |8
SLAB DESIGN
SLAB S1 (FOR ROOF LEVEL)
Lx = 3000 mm, Ly = 5000 mm
Ly / Lx = 1.67 < 2, hence it is a two way slab.
Clear cover = 15 mm
Condition: Two adjacent edges discontinuous
Depth calculation from l/d ratio:
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 93.75 mm
Overall depth = 93.75 + 15 = 108.75 mm.
Let us assume overall depth as 120 mm.
Calculation of load:
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Live load = 1.5 kN/m2
Floor finish = 1.5kN/m2
Total load = 6 kN/m2
Factored load, w = 6 x 1.5 = 9 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 3000 + 120 15 = 3105 mm
Effective Ly = 5000 + 120 15 = 5105 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.644
Bending moment coefficients are:
Page |9
Along shorter span:

x (+) = 0.06, x (-) = 0.079
Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.035, y (-) = 0.047
(Computed according to IS 456: 2000, Table 26)
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 5.206 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 6.854 kNm
(According to IS 456: 2000, clause D-2.1)
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 3.037 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 4.078 kNm
Maximum design moment, Md= 6.854 kNm
Check for depth provided:
d (Required) =
= 40.7 mm < 100 mm
Hence, depth provided is safe.

Reinforcement design:
For short span:
Width of middle strip =
Width of edge strip =
= 3828.75 mm
= 638.125 mm

P a g e | 10
Available depth = D 15 5 = 100 mm

Steel required for middle strip, Ast =
= 147.267 mm2
Check for spacing:

Let us assume 10 mm diameter steel bars for middle and end strips.
Spacing provided =
= 533.317 mm
Spacing should not be greater than the lesser of:

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm
Hence, spacing provided = 300 mm.
Ast provided for middle strip =

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
.
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 147.267 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 195.224 mm2
= 402.308 mm
Provided spacing as per previous requirements = 300 mm
Hence, Ast provided for edge strip =
= 261.8 mm2
Alternate bottom bars are curtailed at distance of 0.15 x Ly = 765.75 mm from

the centre of discontinuous edge and 0.25 x Ly = 1276.25 mm from the face of
continuous edge.
Top bars are extended at distance of 0.3 x Ly = 1531.5 mm from the end of
continuous edge.
For long span:
Available depth = 100 5 = 95 mm
= 2328.75 mm
= 388.125 mm

P a g e | 11
= 89.758 mm2
Spacing required for middle strip =
= 857.018 mm
Providing spacing of 300 mm as per previous requirements, A st provided =
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 89.758 mm2
required
for
.
Required spacing =
edge
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 121.092 mm2
= 648.597 mm
Providing 300 mm spacing, Ast provided for edge strip =

mm2
= 261.8
Alternate bottom bars are curtailed at distance of 0.15 x Lx = 465.75 mm from

the centre of discontinuous edge and 0.25 x Lx = 776.25 mm from the face of
continuous edge.
Top bars are extended at distance of 0.3 x Lx = 931.5 mm from the end of
continuous edge.
Check for deflection:
Percentage of tension reinforcement provided =
Service stress, fs = .
Modification factor = 2
= 0.2618
= 135.398
(From IS 456: 2000, clause 23.2.1, figure 4)

max =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
=
Lx
< 64.
Detailing diagram for slab S1 is given in Figure 4(a) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 12

Lx = 2625 mm, Ly = 3000 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Condition: One short edge continuous
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 82.031 mm
Overall depth = 82.031 + 15 = 97.031 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 2625 + 120 15 = 2730 mm
Effective Ly = 3000 + 120 15 = 3105 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.137
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 13
x (+) = 0.034, x (-) = 0.045

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.028, y (-) = 0.037
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 2.281 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 3.018 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 1.878 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 2.481 kNm
d (Required) =
= 27 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 2328.75 mm
= 388.125 mm

P a g e | 14
= 63.759 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 1231.82 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
.
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 63.759 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 84.634 mm2
= 928 mm
= 261.8 mm2

continuous edge.
Top bars are extended at distance of 0.3 x L y = 931.5 mm from the end of
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2047.5 mm
= 341.25 mm
= 55.228 mm2

P a g e | 15
= 1422.107 mm
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 55.228 mm2
required
for
edge
Required spacing =
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 73.173 mm2
= 1073.354 mm

mm2
= 261.8

continuous edge.
Top bars are extended at distance of 0.3 x Lx = 819 mm from the end of
continuous edge.
= 0.2618
= 58.621

max =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
=
Lx
. < 64.
Detailing diagram for Slab S2 is shown in Figure 4(b) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 16

Lx = 3000 mm, Ly = 4600 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 93.75 mm
Overall depth = 93.75 + 15 = 108.75 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 3000 + 120 15 = 3105 mm
Effective Ly = 4600 + 120 15 = 4705 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.515
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 17
x (+) = 0.056, x (-) = 0.075

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.035, y (-) = 0.047
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 4.859 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 6.507 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 3.037 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 4.078 kNm
d (Required) =
= 39.647 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 3528.75 mm
= 588.125 mm

P a g e | 18

= 137.255 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 572.218 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
.
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 137.255 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 185.072 mm2
= 424.376 mm
= 261.8 mm2

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2328.75 mm
= 388.125 mm

P a g e | 19
= 89.758 mm2
= 875.018 mm
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 89.758 mm2
required
for
.
Required spacing =
edge
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 121.092 mm2
= 648.597 mm

mm2
= 261.8

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
= 0.2618
= 126.193

max =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
=
Lx
< 64.
Detailing diagram of slab S3 is shown in Figure 4(c) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 20

Lx = 2600 mm, Ly = 5000 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Condition: One short edge discontinuous
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 81.25 mm
Overall depth = 81.25 + 15 = 96.25 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 2600 + 120 15 = 2705 mm
Effective Ly = 5000 + 120 15 = 5105 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.887
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 21
x (+) = 0.046, x (-) = 0.059

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.028, y (-) = 0.037
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 3.029 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 3.885 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 1.843 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 2.436 kNm
d (Required) =
= 30.635 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 3828.75 mm
= 638.125 mm

P a g e | 22
= 84.941 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 924.641 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
.
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 137.255 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 109.319 mm2
= 718.446 mm
= 261.8 mm2

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2028.75 mm
= 338.125 mm
= 54.213 mm2

P a g e | 23
= 1448.731 mm
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 54.213 mm2
required
for
edge
Required spacing =
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 71.824 mm2
= 1093.503 mm

mm2
= 261.8

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
= 0.2618
= 78.095

max =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
=
Lx
< 64.
Detailing diagram of Slab S4 is shown in Figure 1(d) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 24

Lx = 2600 mm, Ly = 2625 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Condition: Interior panel
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 81.25 mm
Overall depth = 81.25 + 15 = 96.25 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 2600 + 120 15 = 2705 mm
Effective Ly = 2625 + 120 15 = 2730 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.009
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 25
x (+) = 0.044, x (-) = 0.059

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.024, y (-) = 0.032
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 2.897 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 3.885 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 1.580 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 2.107 kNm
d (Required) =
= 30.635 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 2047.5 mm
= 341.25 mm

P a g e | 26
= 81.206 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 967.175 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
.
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 81.206 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 109.319 mm2
= 718.446 mm
= 261.8 mm2
Alternate bottom are curtailed at distance of 0.15 x Ly = 409.5 mm from the

centre of discontinuous edge and 0.25 x Ly = 682.5 mm from the face of
continuous edge.
Top bars are extended at distance of 0.3 x Ly = 819 mm from the end of
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2028.75 mm
= 338.125 mm
= 46.415 mm2

P a g e | 27
= 1692.12 mm
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 46.415 mm2
required
for
edge
Required spacing =
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 62.028 mm2
= 1266.185 mm

mm2
= 261.8
Alternate bottom are curtailed at distance of 0.15 x Lx = 405.75 mm from the

centre of discontinuous edge and 0.25 x Lx = 676.25 mm from the face of
continuous edge.
continuous edge.

max =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
=
Lx
< 64.
Detailing diagram of slab is shown in Figure 4(e) of Annexure I.

= 0.2618
= 74.661
P a g e | 28

Lx = 2600 mm, Ly = 4600 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 81.25 mm
Overall depth = 81.25 + 15 = 96.25 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 2600 + 120 15 = 2705 mm
Effective Ly = 4600 + 120 15 = 4705 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.74
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 29
x (+) = 0.048, x (-) = 0.064

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.028, y (-) = 0.037
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 3.160 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 4.215 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 1.843 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 2.436kNm
d (Required) =
= 31.906 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 3528.75 mm
= 588.125 mm

P a g e | 30
= 88.681 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 885.650 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 88.681 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 118.741 mm2
= 661.441 mm
= 261.8 mm2

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2028.75 mm
= 338.125 mm
= 54.213 mm2

P a g e | 31
= 1448.73 mm
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 54.213 mm2
required
for
edge
Required spacing =
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 71.824 mm2
= 1093.503 mm

mm2.
= 261.8

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
= 0.2618
= 81.533

max =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
=
Lx
< 64.
Detailing diagram for Slab S6 is shown in Figure 4(f) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 32

Lx = 3500 mm, Ly = 5000 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 109.375 mm
Overall depth = 109.375 + 15 = 124.375 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 3500 + 120 15 = 3605 mm
Effective Ly = 5000 + 120 15 = 5105 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.887
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 33
x (+) = 0.053, x (-) = 0.071

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.035, y (-) = 0.047
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 6.199 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 8.304 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 4.094 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 5.497kNm
d(Required) =
= 44.787 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 3828.75 mm
= 638.125 mm

P a g e | 34
= 176.071 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 446.07 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 176.071 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 237.957 mm2
= 330.06 mm
= 261.8 mm2

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2703.75 mm
= 450.625 mm
= 121.564 mm2

P a g e | 35
= 646.081 mm
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 121.564 mm2
required
for
Required spacing =
edge
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 164.283 mm2
= 478.078 mm

mm2
= 261.8

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
Modification factor = 1.7
= 0.2618
= 161.88

max =
. =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
Lx
.
=
< 54.4
Detailing diagram for Slab S7 is shown in Figure 4(g) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 36

Lx = 2625 mm, Ly = 3500 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 82.031 mm
Overall depth = 82.031 + 15 = 97.031 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 2625 + 120 15 = 2730 mm
Effective Ly = 3500 + 120 15 = 3605 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.321
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 37
x (+) = 0.039, x (-) = 0.051

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.028, y (-) = 0.037
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 2.615 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 3.420 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 1.878 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 2.481kNm
d (Required) =
= 28.745 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 2703.75 mm
= 450.625 mm

P a g e | 38
= 73.233 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 1072.474 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 73.233 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 96.0723 mm2
= 817.509 mm
= 261.8 mm2

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2047.5 mm
= 341.25 mm
= 55.228 mm2

P a g e | 39
= 1422.107 mm
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 55.228 mm2
required
for
edge
Required spacing =
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 73.1725 mm2
= 1073.354 mm

mm2
= 261.8

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
= 0.2618
= 67.33

max =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
=
Lx
. < 64
Detailing diagram for slab S8 is shown in Figure 4(h) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 40

Lx = 3500 mm, Ly = 4600 mm
Ly / Lx = 1.314< 2, hence it is a two way slab.
Clear cover = 15 mm
Condition: One long edge discontinuous
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 109.375 mm
Overall depth = 109.375 + 15 = 124.375 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 3500 + 120 15 = 3605 mm
Effective Ly = 4600 + 120 15 = 4705 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.305
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 41
x (+) = 0.044, x (-) = 0.057

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.028, y (-) = 0.037
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 5.146 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 6.67 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 3.274 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 4.327 kNm
d (Required) =
= 40.129 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 3528.75 mm
= 588.125 mm

P a g e | 42
= 145.542 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 539.637 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 145.542 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 189.727 mm2
= 413.964 mm
= 261.8 mm2

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2703.75 mm
= 450.625 mm
= 96.897 mm2

P a g e | 43
= 810.555 mm
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 96.897 mm2
required
for
Required spacing =
edge
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 128.645 mm2
= 610.517 mm

mm2
= 261.8

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
= 0.2618
= 133.812

max =
. =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
Lx
.
=
< 60.8
Detailing diagram of Slab S9 is shown in Figure 4(i) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 44
SLAB S1 (FOR INTERMEDIATE FLOOR LEVEL)

Lx = 3000 mm, Ly = 5000 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 93.75 mm
Overall depth = 93.75 + 15 = 108.75 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 3000 + 120 15 = 3105 mm
Effective Ly = 5000 + 120 15 = 5105 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.644
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 45
x (+) = 0.06, x (-) = 0.079

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.035, y (-) = 0.047
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 6.941 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 9.14 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 4.049 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 5.437kNm
d (Required) =
= 46.99 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 3828.75 mm
= 638.125 mm

P a g e | 46
= 197.767 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 397.135 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 197.767 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 262.824 mm2
= 298.831 mm
= 270.83 mm2

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2328.75 mm
= 388.125 mm

= 120.22 mm2

P a g e | 47
= 653.32 mm
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 120.22 mm2
required
for
Required spacing =
edge
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 162.45 mm2
= 483.47 mm

mm2
= 261.8

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
= 0.2618
= 181.827

max =
. =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
Lx
.
=
< 52.
Detailing diagram of Slab S1 is shown in Figure 5(a) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 48

Lx = 2625 mm, Ly = 3000 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Condition: One short edge continuous
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 82.031 mm
Overall depth = 82.031 + 15 = 97.031 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 2625 + 120 15 = 2730 mm
Effective Ly = 3000 + 120 15 = 3105 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.137
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 49
x (+) = 0.034, x (-) = 0.045

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.028, y (-) = 0.037
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 3.041 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 4.025 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 2.504 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 3.309 kNm
d (Required) =
= 31.18 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 2328.75 mm
= 388.125 mm

P a g e | 50
= 85.27 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 921.091 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 85.27mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 113.3 mm2
= 693.205 mm
= 261.8 mm2

continuous edge.
Top bars are extended at distance of 0.3 x L y = 931.5 mm from the end of
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2047.5 mm
= 341.25 mm

= 73.84 mm2

P a g e | 51
= 1063.666 mm
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 73.84 mm2
required
for
edge
Required spacing =
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 97.92 mm2
= 802.083 mm

mm2
= 261.8

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
= 0.2618
= 78.396

max =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
=
Lx
. < 64.
Detailing diagram for Slab S2 is shown in Figure 5(b) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 52

Lx = 3000 mm, Ly = 4600 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 93.75 mm
Overall depth = 93.75 + 15 = 108.75 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 3000 + 120 15 = 3105 mm
Effective Ly = 4600 + 120 15 = 4705 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.515
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 53
x (+) = 0.056, x (-) = 0.075

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.035, y (-) = 0.047
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 6.479 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 8.677 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 4.049 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 5.438 kNm
d(Required) =
= 45.781 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 3528.75 mm
= 588.125 mm

P a g e | 54
= 184.227 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 426.322 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 184.227 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 249.023 mm2
= 315.39 mm
= 261.8 mm2
Altrnate bottom bars are curtailed at distance of 0.15 x Ly = 705.75 mm from

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2328.75 mm
= 388.125 mm

= 120.218 mm2

P a g e | 55
= 653.315 mm
Providing spacing of 300 mm as per previous requirements, Ast provided =
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 120.218 mm2
required
for
Required spacing =
edge
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 162.452 mm2
= 483.466 mm

mm2
= 261.8

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
= 0.2618
= 169.38

max =
. =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
Lx
.
=
< 54.4
Detailing diagram for Slab S3 is shown in Figure 5(c) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 56

Lx = 2600 mm, Ly = 5000 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 81.25 mm
Overall depth = 81.25 + 15 = 96.25 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 2600 + 120 15 = 2705 mm
Effective Ly = 5000 + 120 15 = 5105 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.887
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 57
x (+) = 0.046, x (-) = 0.059

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.028, y (-) = 0.037
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 4.039 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 5.18 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 2.459 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 3.249 kNm
d (Required) =
= 35.374 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 3828.75 mm
= 638.125 mm

P a g e | 58
= 113.713 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 690.687 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 113.713 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 146.525 mm2
= 536.089 mm
= 261.8 mm

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2028.75 mm
= 338.125 mm
= 72.478 mm2

P a g e | 59
= 1083.635 mm
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 72.478 mm2
required
for
Required spacing =
edge
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 96.109 mm2
= 817.196 mm

mm2
= 261.8

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
= 0.2618
=104.548

max =
. =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
Lx
.
=
< 57.06.
Detailing diagram of Slab S4 is shown in Figure 5(d) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 60

Lx = 2600 mm, Ly = 2625 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Condition: Interior panel
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 81.25 mm
Overall depth = 81.25 + 15 = 96.25 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 2600 + 120 15 = 2705 mm
Effective Ly = 2625 + 120 15 = 2730 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.009
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 61
x (+) = 0.044, x (-) = 0.059

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.024, y (-) = 0.032
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 3.863 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 5.18 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 2.107 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 2.81 kNm
d (Required) =
= 35.374 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 2047.5 mm
= 341.25 mm

P a g e | 62
= 108.692 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 722.59 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 108.692 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 146.525 mm2
= 536.019 mm
= 261.8 mm2

continuous edge.
Top bars are extended at distance of 0.3 x Ly = 819 mm from the end of
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2028.75 mm
= 338.125 mm
= 62.029 mm2

P a g e | 63
= 1266.185 mm
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 62.029 mm2
required
for
edge
Required spacing =
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 82.96 mm2
= 946.718 mm

mm2
= 261.8

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
= 0.2618
= 99.932

max =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
=
Lx
< 64.
Detailing diagram of Slab S5 is shown in Figure 5(e) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 64

Lx = 2600 mm, Ly = 4600 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 81.25 mm
Overall depth = 81.25 + 15 = 96.25 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 2600 + 120 15 = 2705 mm
Effective Ly = 4600 + 120 15 = 4705 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.74
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 65
x (+) = 0.048, x (-) = 0.064

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.028, y (-) = 0.037
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 4.215 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 5.619 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 2.458 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 3.249kNm
d (Required) =
= 36.843 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 3528.75 mm
= 588.125 mm

P a g e | 66
= 118.741 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 661.441 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 118.741 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 159.228 mm2
= 493.256 mm
= 261.8 mm2

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2028.75 mm
= 338.125 mm
= 72.478 mm2

P a g e | 67
= 1083.635 mm
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 72.478 mm2
required
for
edge
Required spacing =
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 96.109 mm2
= 817.196 mm

mm2
= 261.8

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
= 0.2618
= 109.171

max =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
=
Lx
< 64.
Detailing diagram of Slab S6 is shown in Figure 5(f) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 68

Lx = 3500 mm, Ly = 5000 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 109.375 mm
Overall depth = 109.375 + 15 = 124.375 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 3500 + 120 15 = 3605 mm
Effective Ly = 5000 + 120 15 = 5105 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.887
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 69
x (+) = 0.053, x (-) = 0.071

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.035, y (-) = 0.047
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 8.265 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 11.073 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 5.458 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 7.323kNm
d (Required) =
= 51.716 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 3828.75 mm
= 638.125 mm

P a g e | 70
= 236.8 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 331.671 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 236.8 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 321.094 mm2
= 244.6 mm
= 327.25 mm2

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2703.75 mm
= 450.625 mm
= 163.09 mm2

P a g e | 71
= 481.578 mm
Providing spacing of 300 mm as per previous requirements, Ast provided =
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 163.09 mm2
required
for
Required spacing =
edge
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 220.91 mm2
= 355.53 mm

mm2
= 261.8

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
= 0.2618
= 217.715

max =
. =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
Lx
.
=
< 51.2
Detailing diagram for Slab S7 is shown in Figure 5(g) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 72

Lx = 2625 mm, Ly = 3500 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 82.031 mm
Overall depth = 82.031 + 15 = 97.031 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 2625 + 120 15 = 2730 mm
Effective Ly = 3500 + 120 15 = 3605 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.321
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 73
x (+) = 0.039, x (-) = 0.051

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.028, y (-) = 0.037
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 3.488 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 4.561 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 2.504 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 3.309kNm
d (Required) =
= 33.192 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 2703.75 mm
= 450.625 mm

P a g e | 74
= 97.982 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 801.573 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 97.982 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 128.685 mm2
= 610.33 mm
= 261.8 mm2

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2047.5 mm
= 341.25 mm
= 73.839 mm2

P a g e | 75
= 1063.666 mm
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 73.839 mm2
required
for
edge
Required spacing =
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 97.912 mm2
= 802.083 mm

mm2
= 261.8

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
= 0.2618
= 90.085

max =
provided =
Hence, it is safe.
=
Lx
. < 64
Detailing diagram of Slab S8 is shown in Figure 5(h) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 76

Lx = 3500 mm, Ly = 4600 mm
Clear cover = 15 mm
Condition: One long edge discontinuous
Let l/d = 32
Then, d = 109.375 mm
Overall depth = 109.375 + 15 = 124.375 mm.
Dead load = 0.12 x 25 = 3 kN/m2
Design Criteria:
Effective Lx = 3500 + 120 15 = 3605 mm
Effective Ly = 4600 + 120 15 = 4705 mm
Then, r = Ly / Lx = 1.305
Along shorter span:
P a g e | 77
x (+) = 0.044, x (-) = 0.057

Along longer span:
y (+) = 0.028, y (-) = 0.037
Design moments are:
Along shorter span:
Mx (+) = x w Lx2 = 6.862 kNm
Mx (-) = x w Lx2 = 8.889 kNm
Along longer span:
My (+) = y w Lx2 = 4.367 kNm
My (-) = y w Lx2 = 5.77 kNm
d (Required) =
= 46.338 mm < 100 mm

For short span:
= 3528.75 mm
= 588.125 mm

P a g e | 78
= 195.433 mm2
Check for spacing:

Spacing provided =
= 401.88 mm

300 mm or 3d = 3x100 = 300 mm

Ast
.
required
Required spacing =
for
edge
= 261.8 mm2> 195.433 mm2
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 255.349 mm2
= 307.58 mm
= 261.8 mm2

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
For long span:
= 2703.75 mm
= 450.625 mm
= 129.827 mm2

P a g e | 79
= 604.96 mm
Ast
= 261.8 mm2> 129.827 mm2
required
for
edge
Required spacing =
strip
(top
reinforcement)
] = 172.655 mm2
= 454.9 mm

mm2
= 261.8

continuous edge.
continuous edge.
= 0.2618
= 179.68

max =
. =
provided =
Lx
Thus, the slab is safe.
.
=
< 51.2
Detailing diagram of Slab S9 is shown in Figure 5(i) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 80
LIVE LOAD ANALYSIS

Live load intensity on roof=1.5 KN/m2
Live load intensity on other floors=2.5 KN/m2
Considering Frame 1at roof level:
Effective length of Beam: A12-5300 mm
A23-2925mm
A34-4900mm
A45-4050 mm
A56-4900mm
A67-2925mm
A78-5300mm
Load on beam from slab = Load intensity X contact area of the slab with the
beam.
Table 1: Load calculation for beams for live load
Load calculation
for live load
Live load from
slab
Load on beam(KN/m)
A12
A23
A34
A45
A56
1.61 0.88 1.41
1.3
1.41 0.88 1.61
Calculation of fixed end moments at beams=
A67
A78
(w=load per unit length of
the beam, L=effective span)
Table 2: Fixed end moments on beams for LL

Calculation of
fixed end moments A12 A23 A34 A45 A56 A67 A78
Moment due to live
load(KNm)
3.77 0.63 2.82 1.78 2.82 0.63 3.77

P a g e | 81
Calculation of Distribution Factors:

K=4EI/L (where K=relative stiffness, EI=flexural rigidity, L=effective span of
beam)
Table 3: Calculation of Distribution Factors for beams
Member
DF
A12
0.00059
0.001236
0.48
A21
0.00059
0.002304
0.26
A23
0.001068 0.002304
0.46
A32
0.001068 0.002353
0.45
A34
0.000638 0.002353
0.27
A43
0.000638 0.002056
0.31
A45
0.000772 0.002056
0.38
A54
0.000772 0.002056
0.38
A56
0.000638 0.002056
0.31
A65
0.000638 0.002353
0.27
A67
0.001068 0.002353
0.45
A76
0.001068 0.002304
0.46
A78
0.00059
0.002304
0.26
A87
0.00059
0.001236
0.48
Distribution factors for columns:

Table 4: Calculation of Distribution Factors for columns
Columns
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
DF
0.52
0.28
0.28
0.31
0.31
0.28
0.28
0.52

P a g e | 82
Moment Distribution Tables

Table 5: Maximum negative moments at supports for LL
Members
A12
A21
A23
A32
A34
A43
A45
A54
A56
A65
A67
A76
A78
A87
DF
0.48
0.26
0.46
0.45
0.27
0.31
0.38
0.38
0.31
0.27
0.45
0.46
0.26
0.48
FEM,LL
-3.77
3.77
-0.63
0.63
-2.82
2.82
-1.78
1.78
-2.82
2.82
-0.63
0.63
-3.77
3.77
1.81
0.816 1.444 0.986 0.591 -0.322 -0.395
0.322
0.591 0.986 1.444 0.816 -1.81
DM
COM
DM
Total M
0.395
0.408 0.905 0.493 0.722 0.161 0.2955 0.1975 0.1975 0.2955 0.161 0.722 0.493 0.905 0.408
0.196 0.363 0.643 0.397 0.238 -0.153 -0.187
2.172 3.496 2.224 1.291 2.152
2.641
-2.165
0.238 0.397 0.643 0.363 0.196
0.187
0.153
2.165
-2.641 2.152 1.291 2.224 3.496 2.172

P a g e | 83
Table 6: Positive moment at midspan of beams for LL

Beams A12 A23 A34 A45 A56 A67
Moment 2.819 0.816 1.835 0.500 1.835 0.816
A78
2.819
Table 7: Maximum moments in columns for LL

Columns
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
Moments 1.129 -0.356 0.241 -0.148 0.148 -0.241 0.356 -1.129

P a g e | 84
Table 8: Shear force in beams for LL

Beams
S.F.(KN)
A12
A23
A34
A45
A56
A67
A78
Near
end
Far
end
Near
end
Far
end
Near
end
Far
end
Near
end
Far
end
Near
end
Far
end
Near
end
Far
end
Near
end
Far
end
3.19
5.34
0.08
2.49
2.48
4.43
1.57
3.7
2.48
4.43
0.08
2.49
3.19
5.34
Table 9: Axial forces in columns for LL

Columns
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
Force(KN)
3.19
5.42
4.97
6.18
4.51
5.68
5.34
The bending moment diagram for live load in beams (Frame 1) is shown in Figure 6(a) of Annexure I.
The bending moment diagram for live load in columns (Frame 1) is shown in Figure 6(b) of Annexure I.
The shear force diagram for live load in beams (Frame 1) is shown in Figure 6(c) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 85
DEAD LOAD ANALYSIS

Dimensions of beams for all floors= 300mmx500mm
Dimensions of columns for all floors= 400mmx400mm
Outside wall thickness (including plastering) = 300mm
Inside wall thickness (including plastering) = 150mm
Dead load intensity due to self weight of slab= 25x0.12=3 KN/m2
Floor finish load= 1.5 KN/m2 for roofs and 2.5 KN/m2 for other floors
Considering Frame 1 at roof level
Height of parapet wall= 1 m
Thickness of parapet walls= 200 mm
Effective length of Beams: A12-5300 mm
A23-2925mm
A34-4900mm
A45-4050 mm
A56-4900mm
A67-2925mm
A78-5300mm

P a g e | 86
Table 10: Load calculation for beams for dead load

Load calculation for dead
load
Load on beam(KN/m)
A12
A23
A34
A45
A56
A67
A78
A.
Dead load from slab
4.83
2.65
4.58
3.91
4.58
2.65
4.83
B.
Dead load from parapet

wall
C.
Self weight of beam
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
D.
Total Dead load on

beam
12.58
10.4
12.33
11.66
12.33
10.4
12.58
Calculation of fixed end moments at beams=
(w= load per unit length of the beam, L=effective span)
Table 11: Fixed end moments on beams for DL
Calculation of fixed end

moments
A12
A23
A34
A45
A56
A67
A78
Moment due to dead

load(KNm)
29.45
7.41
24.67
15.94
24.67
7.41
29.45

P a g e | 87
Moment Distribution Tables

Table 12: Negative moments at supports for DL
Members A12
0.48
DF
FEM,LL -29.45
A21
0.26
29.45
A23
0.46
-7.41
A32
0.45
7.41
A34
0.27
-24.67
A43
0.31
24.67
A45
0.38
-15.94
A54
0.38
15.94
A56
0.31
-24.67
A65
0.27
24.67
A67
0.45
-7.41
A76
0.46
7.41
A78
0.26
-29.45
14.136
-5.73
-10.138
7.767
4.66
-2.706
-3.317
3.317
2.706
-4.66
-7.767
5.73
-1.353
1.734
2.33
-1.236
1.6585
-1.516
-1.6585
1.516
-2.33
1.236
1.353
-1.734
5.069
-2.89
10.138
3.8835
5.038
A87
0.48
29.45
14.136
-7.068
2.847
2.865
-1.375
-19.629
23.058
-19.115
19.115
-23.058 19.629 -12.998 18.703
-27.941
16.804
DM
COM
DM
Total M
-2.865 7.068 3.8835 -5.069

1.375 -2.847 -5.038
2.89
16.804 27.941 -18.703 12.998
Table 13: Positive moment at midspan for DL

Beams
A12
A23
A34
A45
A56
A67
A78
Moment 21.79903 4.728188 15.66191 4.791644 15.66191 4.728188 21.79903
Table 13: Moments in columns for DL
Columns
C1
Moments 8.738
C2
-2.587
C3
1.857
C4
-1.222
C5
1.222
C6
-1.857

C7
2.587
C8
-8.738
P a g e | 88
Table 14: Shear force in beams for DL

Beams
S.F.(KN)
A12
A23
A34
Near
end
Far
end
Near
end
Far
end
Near
end
24.89
41.78
4.37
26.05
21.5
A45
Far
end
Near
end
A56
Far
end
38.92 14.17 33.05
A67
Near
end
Far
end
Near
end
21.5
38.92
4.37
A78
Far
end
Near
end
26.05 24.89 41.78
Table 15: Axial forces in columns for DL

Columns C1
24.89
Force
C2
46.15
C3
47.55
C4
53.09
C5
54.55
C6
43.29
C7
50.94
C8
41.78
Diagram for Bending Moment in beams for Dead Load (Frame 1) is shown in Figure 7(a) of Annexure I.
Diagram for Bending Moment in columns for Dead Load (Frame 1) is shown in Figure 7(b) of Annexure I.
Diagram for Shear Force in beams for Dead Load (Frame 1) is shown in Figure 7(c) of Annexure I.

Far
end
P a g e | 89
SEISMIC ANALYSIS
Let size of beam at floor level be = 300 mm x 500 mm
Let size of columns at all levels be = 400 mm x 400 mm
Total area of slab
= 281.625 m2
Total number of beams
= 50
Total number of columns
= 32
1.
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
For w1 at roof level (as per IS 1893 Part 1 : 2002 Clause 7.4):
Self weight of slab + floor finish load = 1267.3125 kN
Live load
= 1.5 kN/m2 (as per IS 875 Part 2)
Weight of beam
= 708.938 kN
Weight of columns
= 211.2 kN
Weight of inner + outer walls
= 1447.875 kN
Weight of parapet walls
= 335 kN
Total w1
= 4075.934 kN
2. For w2 at fifth floor level (as per IS 1893 Part 1 : 2002 Clause 7.4):
a) Self weight of slab + floor finish load = 1548.938 kN
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
Live load
Weight of beam
Weight of columns
Weight of outer walls
Weight of inner walls
Total w2

= 708.938 kN
= 422.4 kN
= 1980 kN
= 915.75 kN
= 5752.041 kN
3. For w3 at fourth floor level (as per IS 1893 Part 1 : 2002 Clause 7.4):
b)
c)
d)
e)
Live load
Weight of beam
Weight of columns

= 708.938 kN
= 422.4 kN
= 1980 kN

P a g e | 90
f) Weight of inner walls

Total w3
= 915.75 kN
= 5752.041 kN
4. For w4 at third floor level (as per IS 1893 Part 1 : 2002 Clause 7.4):
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
Live load
Weight of beam
Weight of columns
Total w4

= 708.938 kN
= 422.4 kN
= 1980 kN
= 915.75 kN
= 5752.041 kN
5. For w5 at second floor level (as per IS 1893 Part 1 : 2002 Clause 7.4):
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
Live load
Weight of beam
Weight of columns
Total w5

= 708.938 kN
= 422.4 kN
= 1980 kN
= 915.75 kN
= 5752.041 kN
6. For w6 at first floor level (as per IS 1893 Part 1 : 2002 Clause 7.4):
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
Live load
Weight of beam
Weight of columns
Total w6

= 708.938 kN
= 422.4 kN
= 1980 kN
= 915.75 kN
= 5752.041 kN
Gross total weight, w = w1 + w2 + w3 + w4 + w5 + w6

Total height of building = 21.5 m
P a g e | 91
Calculation of approximate fundamental natural time period, Ta

(From IS 1893 Part 1: 2002, Clause 7.6.2) =
= 0.0612 (in shorter direction)
= 0.0312 (in longer direction)

Considering higher value, Ta = 0.0612
For medium soil sites,
= (1 + 15Ta) (From IS 1893 Part 1: 2002, clause 6.4.5)
Design horizontal seismic coefficient, =
2002, Clause 6.4.2)
(From IS 1893 Part 1:
Here, Z = zone factor = 0.36 (Table 2)

I = importance factor = 1 (Table 6)
R = response reduction factor = 5 (Table 7) (Since it is a Special Moment
Resisting Frame meeting ductile detailing requirements)
= .
Design seismic base shear, = =
Table 16: Calculation of earthquake lateral loads

LEVEL
SEISMIC LOAD AT EACH LEVEL
FRAME FRAME FRAME

1
2
3
Qi = Vb x Wi
x Hi2/WiHi2
Qi/4
Qi/8
Qi/4
4075.934 21.5 1884100.665
439.778
109.944
54.972
109.945
5752.041 18.2 1905305.937
444.7278015
111.182
55.591
111.182
5752.041 14.9 1277010.539
298.0739621
74.5185
37.259
74.5185
5752.041 11.6 773994.5865
180.662278
45.165
22.5827
45.165
5752.041
8.3
396258.0787
92.4927492
23.123
11.562
23.123
4252.965
106324.1406
24.81769484
6.2044
3.102
6.204
Wi
Hi
Wi x
Hi2
1
(Roof)
2
3
4
5
6

P a g e | 92
Using Portal Method, we determine the various reactions in the frame

members.
Table 17: Seismic load Analysis for Frame 1
Storey
Lateral
Force
1(Roof)
109.944
2
111.181
3
74.518
4
45.165
5
23.123
6
6.2044
(Continuation)
Shear for
column
Outer
columns
shear
Intermediate
columns
shear
Outer
Column
Moment
Inner
Column
Moment
6.871
13.820
18.477
21.300
22.745
23.133
6.871
13.820
18.477
21.300
22.745
23.133
13.743
27.640
36.955
42.601
45.491
46.267
11.338
22.803
30.488
35.146
37.530
28.917
22.676
45.607
60.976
70.292
75.061
57.834
Beam Shear
Storey
1(Roof)
2
3
4
5
6
Beam
Moment
11.338
34.141
53.292
65.634
72.676
66.447
A12
4.278
12.883
20.110
24.767
27.425
25.074
A23
7.752
23.344
36.439
44.878
49.693
45.434
A34
A45
A56
4.627
5.599
4.627
13.935 16.860 13.935
21.751 26.3170 21.751
26.789 32.412 26.789
29.663 35.889 29.663
27.121 32.813 27.121
A67
7.752
23.344
36.439
44.878
49.693
45.434
A78
4.278
12.883
20.110
24.767
27.425
25.074
Table 18: Calculation of axial forces in columns for seismic load

Axial forces in columns
Storey
1(Roof)
2
3
4
5
6
C1
4.278
17.162
37.272
62.040
89.465
114.539
C2
12.031
48.259
104.808
174.454
251.573
322.082
C3
12.3802
49.660
107.851
179.519
258.876
331.432
C4
10.226
41.022
89.091
148.292
213.846
273.781
C5
10.226
41.022
89.091
148.292
213.846
273.781

C6
C7
C8
12.380
12.031
4.278
49.660
48.259
16.551
107.851 104.808 35.942
179.519 174.454 59.816
258.876 251.573 86.241
331.432 322.0823 110.443
P a g e | 93
Diagram showing Lateral Forces acting on Frame 1 is shown in Figure 8(a) of

Annexure I.
Diagram showing Lateral Forces acting on Frame 2 is shown in Figure 8(b) of
Annexure I.
Diagram showing Bending Moment acting on beams and columns for Frame 1
is shown in Figure 8(c) of Annexure I.
is shown in Figure 8(d) of Annexure I.
Diagram showing Shear Force acting on beams for Frame 1 is shown in Figure
8(e) of Annexure I.
8(f) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 94
WIND LOAD ANALYSIS

Design wind speed, =
Here,
= Basic wind speed = 50 m/s (From IS: 875 Part 3 - 1987, Appendix A,
Clause 5.2, considering city Silchar)
= Probability factor (risk coefficient) = 1, considering general building type

with mean probable design life as 50 years (From IS 875 Part 3 - 1987, Clause
5.3.1, Table 1)
= Terrain, height and structure size factor (From Clause 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 of IS
875 Part 3 - 1987, we have considered terrain category 3 and class B)
From Table 2,
= 0.88 up to 10 m
= 0.94 up to 15 m
= 0.98 up to 20 m
= Topography factor = 1 (From Clause 5.3.3.1, as slope < 3 degrees)

= 48.4 m/s
= 51.7 m/s
= 53.9 m/s
Design wind pressure, = . (From IS 875 Part 3 - 1987, Clause 5.4)
= 1405.536 N/m2
= 1603.734 N/m2
= 1743.126 N/m2
Wind load on individual members is given by, =

875 Part 3, clause 6.2.1)
(From IS:
Here,
= Internal pressure coefficient (depends on percent of wall opening)
Total surface area of outer walls = 152.625 m2

P a g e | 95
Total surface area of inner walls = 130.433 m2

Total surface area of all walls = 283.058 m2
Opening for doors = 17.4 m2
Opening for windows = 30.45 m2
Opening for ventilators = 2.52 m2
Total openings = 50.37 m2
Percentage of openings = 17.795%
= 0.5, as percentage of wall opening is between 5 - 20% (From IS 875

Part 3 - 1987, Clause 6.2.3.2)
Again,
= External pressure coefficient (From IS 875 Part 3 - 1987, Table 4)
Height of structure, h = 19 m
Lesser horizontal dimension, w = 10 m

Greater horizontal dimension, l = 30 m
Now,
= 1.9, lies between 1.5 and 6

= 3, lies between 1.5 and 4
Table 19: Calculation of pressure coefficients for wind load
Condition
=0, Cpi=0.5
0.7
-0.4
-0.7
-0.7
Cpe - Cpi
0.2
-0.9
-1.2
-1.2
=0, Cpi=-0.5
0.7
-0.4
-0.7
-0.7
Cpe - Cpi
1.2
-0.1
-0.2
-0.2
=0, Cpi=0.5
-0.5
-0.5
0.8
-0.1
Cpe - Cpi
-1
-1
0.3
-0.6
=0, Cpi=-0.5
-0.5
-0.5
0.8
-0.1
Cpe - Cpi
1.3
0.4
Max
Positive
Max
Negative
0.2
-1.2
1.2
-0.2
0.3
-1
1.3

P a g e | 96
Using Portal Method, we determine the various reactions in the frame members.
Table 20: Analysis for Frame2for wind load
Storey Lateral Force

1(Roof)
7.73
2
14.22
3
14.22
4
12.46
5
12.46
6
12.46
Shear for
column
0.966
2.743
4.521
6.078
7.636
9.1937
Outer
columns
shear
0.966
2.743
4.521
6.078
7.636
9.1937
Intermediate
columns shear
1.932
5.487
9.042
12.157
15.272
18.387
Outer
Column
Moment
1.594
4.527
7.460
10.029
12.599
11.492
Inner
Column
Moment
3.188
9.054
14.920
20.059
25.199
22.984
Continued:
Beam shear
Storey
Beam
1st
Moment
1(Roof)
2
3
4
5
6
1.59
6.12
11.98
17.49
22.62
24.09
0.601
2.31
4.523
6.6
8.539
9.091
2nd
3rd
C1
1.090
4.185
8.196
11.958
15.473
16.473
0.650
2.498
4.892
7.138
9.236
9.833
0.601
2.911
7.435
14.035
22.574
31.665
Axial forces in columns

C2
C3
1.691
8.1873
20.907
39.466
63.479
89.043
1.740
8.425
21.514
40.611
65.321
91.628
Diagram showing Lateral Wind Load acting on Frame 2 is shown in Figure 9(a)
of Annexure I.
is shown in Figure 9(b) of Annexure I.
9(c) of Annexure I.

C4
0.650
3.149
8.042
15.180
24.417
34.250
P a g e | 97
LOAD COMBINATION
Table 30: Maximum Live Load values
For Beams( Roof)
1)Maximum support moment=
For Beams(5th floor)

6.45 1)Maximum support moment=
2)Maximum midspan
2)Maximum midspan moment= 5.21
moment=
3)Maximum shear force=
9.84
3)Maximum Shear force=
For columns(6th storey)
For Columns(5thstorey)
1)Maximum moment=
3
1)Maximum moment=
2)Maximum axial force=
10.58
For Beams(3rd floor)
1)Maximum support moment= 10.87 1)Maximum support moment=
2)Maximum midspan
2)Maximum midspan moment= 7.62
moment=
16.8
For Columns(4th storey)
For Columns(3rd storey)
1)Maximum moment=
3
1)Maximum moment=
45.62
For Beams(2nd floor)
For Beams(1st floor)
10.87
7.62
16.8
3
27.78
10.87
7.62
16.8
3
63.46
10.87 1)Maximum support moment= 10.87
2)Maximum midspan moment=
7.62
16.8
For Columns(2nd storey)
2)Maximum midspan
moment=
7.45
16.87
For columns(1st storey)
1)Maximum moment=
1)Maximum moment=
3.69
81.3
99.4

P a g e | 98
Table 31: Maximum Dead Load values
For Beams( Roof)

27.94

For columns(6th storey)
1)Maximum moment=
3)Self weight of column=
22.07
42.03
66.11

1)Maximum moment=
44.85
100.14
66.11

1)Maximum moment=
44.85
100.14
17.6
54.55
13.2
17.6
311.85
13.2
17.6
569.15
13.2

1)Maximum support
moment=
2)Maximum midspan
moment=
For Columns(5thstorey)
1)Maximum moment=
1)Maximum support
moment=
2)Maximum midspan
moment=
1)Maximum moment=
1)Maximum support
moment=
2)Maximum midspan
moment=
For columns(1st storey)
1)Maximum moment=

66.11
44.85
100.14
17.6
183.2
13.2
66.11
44.85
100.14
17.6
440.5
13.2
66.06
43.85
98.98
21.78
698.08
10
P a g e | 99
Table 32: Maximum Seismic Load Values
For Beams(Roof)
2)Maximum midspan
moment=
1)Maximum moment=
22.68
0
15.51
45.35
24.76
27.49
1)Maximum support moment= 106.58

2)Maximum midspan
moment=
0
72.88
1)Maximum moment=
121.95
215.7
73.91
1)Maximum support moment= 145.35
2)Maximum midspan
moment=
0
99.39
1)Maximum moment=
150.12
517.75
90.98

1)Maximum support
moment=
2)Maximum midspan
moment=
For Columns( 5th storey)
1)Maximum moment=
1)Maximum support
moment=
2)Maximum midspan
moment=
1)Maximum moment=
1)Maximum support
moment=
2)Maximum midspan
moment=
For Columns(1st storey)
1)Maximum moment=

68.28
0
46.69
91.22
99.32
55.28
131.27
0
89.76
140.58
359.04
85.2
132.9
0
90.87
115.67
662.87
92.53
P a g e | 100
Table 33: Maximum Wind Load Values

For Beams(Roof)
1)Maximum support
moment=
2)Maximum midspan
moment=
1)Maximum moment=
1)Maximum support
moment=
2)Maximum midspan
moment=
1)Maximum moment=
1)Maximum support
moment=
2)Maximum midspan
moment=
1)Maximum moment=
50.39

1)Maximum support
moment=
2)Maximum midspan
moment=
For Columns( 5th storey)
1)Maximum moment=
1)Maximum support
moment=
2)Maximum midspan
moment=
1)Maximum moment=
1)Maximum support
moment=
2)Maximum midspan
moment=
For Columns(1st storey)
1)Maximum moment=
127.64
30.54

3.19
0
2.18
6.37
4.11
3.86
23.97
0
16.39
29.83
42.53
18.08
45.25
0
30.94

12.24
0
8.37
18.1
17.1
10.97
34.97
0
23.91
40.11
79.63
24.31
48.17
0
32.94
45.96
178.7
9
36.77
P a g e | 101
Various Load combinations:

Limit state of Collapse
1)1.5(DL+LL)
2) 0.9Dl + 1.5EL
3) 0.9DL 1.5DL
4) 1.5(DL+EL)
5) 1.5(DL EL)
6) 1.2(DL + LL + EL)
7) 1.2(DL + LL - EL)
Limit state of serviceability:
1) DL + LL
2) DL + EL
3) DL EL
4) DL + 0.8LL + 0.8EL
5) DL + 0.8LL 0.8EL
Since, Earthquake load and Wind load do not act simultaneously and in our case
Earthquake load is much more than Wind load, thus we have used only
Earthquake load in our load combinations.
Table 34: Load combinations for beams at roof level
Design Maximum
support moment
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
51.585KNm
59.166KNm
-8.874KNm
75.93KNm
7.89KNm
68.484KNm
14.052KNm
34.39KNm
Design Maximum
midspan moment
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
40.92
19.863
19.863
33.105
33.105
32.736
32.736
27.28
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
Design Maximum shear

force
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)

77.805
61.092
14.562
86.31
39.78
80.856
43.632
51.87
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
P a g e | 102
9)
10)
11)
12)
max=
50.62
5.26
51.244
14.956
75.93
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
9)
10)
11)
12)
max=
22.07
22.07
26.238
26.238
40.92
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
9)
10)
11)
12)
max=
57.54
26.52
62.31
37.494
86.31
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN

Design Maximum
support moment
1)
115.47 KNm
2)
161.919 KNm
3)
-42.921 KNm
4)
201.585 KNm
5)
-3.255 KNm
6)
174.312 KNm
7)
10.44
KNm
8)
76.98
KNm
9)
134.39 KNm
10)
-2.17
KNm
11)
129.43 KNm
12)
20.182 KNm
max= 201.585 KNm
Design Maximum
midspan moment
force
1)
78.705 KNm
1)
175.41
KN
2)
40.365 KNm
2)
160.161 KN
3)
40.365 KNm
3)
20.091
KN
4)
67.275 KNm
4)
220.245 KN
5)
67.275 KNm
5)
80.175
KN
6)
62.964 KNm
6)
196.356 KN
7)
62.964 KNm
7)
84.3
KN
8)
52.47
KNm
8)
116.94
KN
9)
44.85
KNm
9)
146.83
KN
10)
44.85
KNm
10)
53.45
KN
11)
50.946 KNm
11)
150.932 KN
12)
50.946 KNm
12)
76.228
KN
max= 78.705 KNm max= 220.245 KN

Design Maximum
support moment
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
115.47
219.369
100.371
259.035
-60.705
220.272
-35.52
76.98
172.69
Design Maximum
midspan moment

force
KNm
KNm
KNm
1)
2)
3)
78.705 KNm
40.365 KNm
40.365 KNm
1)
2)
3)
175.41 KN
199.446 KN
-19.194 KN
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
67.275
67.275
62.964
62.964
52.47
44.85
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
259.53
40.89
227.784
52.872
116.94
173.02
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm

KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
P a g e | 103
10)
11)
12)
max=
-40.47
160.07
-10.458
259.035
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
10)
11)
12)
max=
44.85
50.946
50.946
78.705
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
10)
11)
12)
max=
27.26
171.884
55.276
259.53
KN
KN
KN
KN
Table 37: Load combinations for 3rd floor beams

Design Maximum
support moment
1)
115.47 KNm
2)
256.404 KNm
3)
KNm
137.406
4)
296.07 KNm
5)
-97.74 KNm
6)
249.9
KNm
7)
-65.148 KNm
8)
76.98
KNm
9)
197.38 KNm
10)
-65.16 KNm
11) 179.822 KNm
12)
-30.21 KNm
max= 296.07 KNm
Design Maximum
midspan moment
force
1)
78.705 KNm
1)
175.41
KN
2)
40.365 KNm
2)
224.766 KN
3)
40.365 KNm
3)
-44.514
KN
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
max=
67.275
67.275
62.964
62.964
52.47
44.85
44.85
50.946
50.946
78.705
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
max=
284.85
15.57
248.04
32.616
116.94
189.9
10.38
185.388
41.772
284.85
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
Table 38: Load combinations for 2nd floor beams

Design Maximum
Design Maximum
support moment
midspan moment
1)
115.47 KNm
1)
78.705 KNm
2)
277.524 KNm
2)
40.365 KNm
3)
-158.526 KNm
3)
40.365 KNm
4)
317.19 KNm
4)
67.275 KNm
5)
-118.86 KNm
5)
67.275 KNm
6)
266.796 KNm
6)
62.964 KNm
7)
-82.044 KNm
7)
62.964 KNm
8)
76.98
KNm
8)
52.47
KNm
9)
211.46 KNm
9)
44.85
KNm
10)
-79.24 KNm 10)
44.85
KNm
11)
191.086 KNm 11)
50.946 KNm
12)
-41.474 KNm 12)
50.946 KNm
max= 317.19 KNm max= 78.705 KNm

force
1)
175.41
KN
2)
239.211
KN
3)
-58.959
KN
4)
299.295
KN
5)
1.125
KN
6)
259.596
KN
7)
21.06
KN
8)
116.94
KN
9)
199.53
KN
10)
10.38
KN
11)
193.092
KN
12)
34.068
KN
max= 299.295
KN

P a g e | 104
Table 39: Load combinations for 1st floor beams

Design Maximum
support moment
1)
115.395
KNm
2)
258.804
KNm
3)
-139.896 KNm
4)
298.44
KNm
5)
-100.26
KNm
6)
251.796
KNm
7)
-67.164
KNm
8)
76.93
KNm
9)
198.96
KNm
10)
-66.84
KNm
11)
181.076
KNm
12)
-31.564
KNm
max=
298.44
KNm
Design Maximum
midspan moment
1)
76.95 KNm
2)
39.465 KNm
3)
39.465 KNm
4)
65.775 KNm
5)
65.775 KNm
6)
61.56 KNm
7)
61.56 KNm
8)
51.3
KNm
9)
43.85 KNm
10)
43.85 KNm
11)
49.81 KNm
12)
49.81 KNm
max
76.95 KNm
=
Design Maximum
shear force
1)
173.775 KN
2)
225.387 KN
3)
-47.223 KN
4)
284.775 KN
5)
12.165
KN
6)
248.064 KN
7)
9.732
KN
8)
115.85
KN
9)
189.85
KN
10)
8.11
KN
11) 185.172 KN
12)
39.78
KN
max= 284.775 KN

Design Maximum moment
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
max=
30.9
83.865
-52.185
94.425
-41.625
79.14
-29.7
20.6
62.95
-27.75
56.28
-16.28
94.425
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
KNm
Design axial force

1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
max=
117.495
98.115
23.835
138.765
64.485
123.708
64.284
78.33
92.51
42.99
96.022
56.406
138.765
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN

Design Shear
force
41.235 KN
P a g e | 105

Design Maximum
moment
1)
30.9
KNm
2)
152.67
KNm
3)
-120.99
KNm
4)
163.23
KNm
5)
-110.43
KNm
6)
134.184
KNm
7)
-84.744
KNm
8)
20.6
KNm
9)
108.82
KNm
10)
-73.62
KNm
11)
92.976
KNm
12)
-52.976
KNm
max=
163.23
KNm
Design axial force

1)
336.27
2)
325.74
3)
27.78
4)
443.58
5)
145.62
6)
388.2
7)
149.832
8)
224.18
9)
295.72
10)
97.08
11)
298.08
12) 139.168
max= 443.58
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
Design Shear
Force
82.92
KN

Design Maximum
moment
1)
30.9
KNm
2)
198.765
KNm
3)
-167.085 KNm
4)
209.325
KNm
5)
-156.525 KNm
6)
171.06
KNm
7)
-121.62
KNm
8)
20.6
KNm
9)
139.55
KNm
10)
-104.35
KNm
11)
117.56
KNm
12)
-77.56
KNm
max=
209.325
KNm
Design axial force

1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
max=
556.005
616.095
-31.005
811.125
164.025
703.644
185.964
370.67
540.75
109.35
534.106
188.986
811.125
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN

Design Shear
force
110.865 KN
P a g e | 106
Table 43: Load Combinations for 3rd storey columns

Design Maximum
moment
1)
30.9
KNm
2)
226.71
KNm
3)
-195.03
KNm
4)
237.27
KNm
5)
-184.47
KNm
6)
193.416
KNm
7)
-143.976 KNm
8)
20.6
KNm
9)
158.18
KNm
10)
-122.98
KNm
11)
138.064
KNm
12)
-92.464
KNm
max=
237.27
KNm
Design axial force

1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
max=
775.74
946.89
-130.23
1219.11
141.99
1051.44
189.744
517.16
812.74
94.66
791.7
217.236
1219.11
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
Design shear
force
127.8
KN
Table 44: Load Combinations for 2nd storey columns

Design Maximum
moment
1)
30.9
KNm
2)
241.02
KNm
3)
-209.34
KNm
4)
251.58
KNm
5)
-198.78
KNm
6)
204.864
KNm
7)
-155.424 KNm
8)
20.6
KNm
9)
167.72
KNm
10)
-132.52
KNm
11)
140.096
KNm
12)
-100.096 KNm
max=
251.58
KNm
Design axial force

1)
995.475
2)
1300.74
3)
-252.51
4)
1412.085
5)
96.9
6)
1417.68
7)
175.08
8)
663.65
9)
1100.1
10)
64.6
11)
1061.59
12)
233.19
max= 1417.68
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN

Design shear
force
136.47 KN
P a g e | 107
Table 45: Load Combinations for 1st storey columns

Design Maximum
moment
1)
38.205
KNm
2)
193.107
KNm
3)
-153.903 KNm
4)
206.175
KNm
5)
-140.835 KNm
6)
169.368
KNm
7)
-108.24
KNm
8)
25.47
KNm
9)
137.45
KNm
10)
-93.89
KNm
11)
117.268
KNm
12)
-67.804
KNm
max=
206.175
KNm
Design axial force

1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
max=
1196.22
1622.577
-366.033
2056.425
52.815
1752.42
161.532
797.48
1360.95
35.21
1307.896
247.304
2056.425
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN
KN

Design shear
force
138.795 KN
P a g e | 108
BEAM DESIGN
DESIGN OF ROOF LEVEL BEAM:
Design negative bending moment = -75.93 kNm
Design positive bending moment = 40.92 kNm
Design shear force
= 86.31 kN
Size of beam
= 300 mm x 500 mm
Width/Depth
1993, clause 6.1.2)
= 0.6 > 0.3 Hence, ok. (As per IS 13920:
Width should not be less than 200 mm. (As per IS 13920: 1993, clause 6.1.3)
Hence, 300 mm width is safe.
Depth should not be greater than = Span/4 (As per IS 13920: 1993, clause 6.1.4)
= 725 mm, considering the minimum span of
roof beams i.e.( 2900/4)
Hence, 500 mm is safe.
Effective depth of beam (d) = 500-25-(16/2) = 467 mm
A. Design of longitudinal reinforcement:

= .
= 270.867 kNm
Reinforcement for hogging moment:

Design hogging moment,
Since,
= 1.16
<
= -75.93 kNm
, hence, section is singly reinforced.
From Table 4 of SP 16:1980,

p (top) = 0.34%
Required area of top reinforcement = 472.137 mm2

P a g e | 109
Reinforcement for sagging moment:

Design sagging moment,
Since,
= 0.63
<
= 40.92 kNm

p (bottom) = 0.18%
Required area of bottom reinforcement = 250.779 mm2
For the bottom portion, using 16mm diameter bars,
Number of bars required = 1.247
Hence, 2 bars of 16mm diameter are provided at the bottom portion.
Hence, Ast provided = 402.125 mm2
For the top portion, using 16mm diameter bars,
Hence, 3 bars of 16mm diameter are provided at the top portion.
Hence, Ast provided ==
Check:
= 603.187 mm2
Minimum area of tension reinforcement shall not be less than that given by the
following:
(As per IS 456: 2000, clause 26.5.1.1(a))
Thus, minimum tension reinforcement, As,min = 603.187 mm2< 402.125 mm2

Hence, safe.
Maximum area of tension reinforcement, As,max = .
2000, clause 26.5.1.1(b))
(As per IS 456:
Thus, maximum tension reinforcement, As,max = 6000 mm2> 603.187 mm2

Hence, ok.

P a g e | 110
B. Design of shear reinforcement:
= 0.00287
= 0.616 N/mm2
Design shear strength of concrete,
Thus,
c,max =
is obtained from IS 456: 2000, Table 19.
= 0.287
c
= 0.39 N/mm2
3.5 N/mm2 (From IS 456: 2000, Table 20)
c< v<
c,max
Hence, shear reinforcement is necessary.

Now, =
= 54639 N
= = 31671 N
According to IS 456: 2000, entire design shear force must be resisted by vertical
stirrups.
Resistance to be provided by vertical stirrups = 31671 N
Using 2 legged stirrups of 8 mm diameter,
Spacing, =
Now,
(From IS 456: 2000, clause 40.4 (a))
= 100.531 mm2
Thus, = 535.207 mm
Spacing corresponding to minimum shear reinforcement is =
(According to IS 456: 2000, Clause 26.5.1.6)
Thus, = 302.472 mm
However, maximum spacing is limited to = 0.75d or 300mm, whichever is less.

Now, 0.75d = 350.25 mm > 300 mm
Minimum spacing of 300 mm is provided.
According to IS 13920: 1993, clause 6.3.5:
Spacing of hoops at a length of 2d from support ie.934 mm from either support:
P a g e | 111
a) d/4 = 116.75 mm
b) 8x diameter of smallest longitudinal bar = 208 mm
Hence, 2 legged 8 mm diameter bars @ 115mm c/c is adopted near supports.
Again, according to IS 13920: 1993, clause 6.3.5:
Spacing of vertical hoops for the rest of the beam < d/2 = 233.5 mm
Hence, for the rest of the beam span, 2 legged 8 mm diameter bars @ 230mm
c/c is adopted.
Detailing diagram for roof level beams is shown in Figures 10(a) and 10(b) of
Annexure I.
DESIGN OF INTERMEDIATE (5TH, 4TH, 3RD, 2ND, 1ST) LEVEL BEAMS:
Design shear force
= 299.3 kN
Size of beam
= 300 mm x 500 mm
Width/Depth
1993, clause 6.1.2)
= 0.6 > 0.3Hence, ok. (As per IS 13920:
beams i.e. (2900/4)
Effective depth of beam (d) = 500-25-(20/2) = 465 mm, considering 20 mm
diameter bars at the bottom.

P a g e | 112

= .
= 268.552 kNm

Since,
= 4.89
>
= -317.19 kNm
, hence, section is doubly reinforced.
= 0.08065 (Using 25mm diameter bars at the top)

p (top) = 1.66%

p(bottom) = 0.25%
Required area of reinforcement = 341.775 mm2
Since,
= 1.21
<
= 78.7 kNm

p (bottom) = 0.35%
Adopting maximum values,
p(top) = 1.66%
p(bottom) = 0.35%
For the bottom portion, using 20 mm diameter bars,
P a g e | 113

Hence, 5bars of 25mm diameter are provided at the top portion.
Hence, Ast provided =
= 2454.375mm2
Check:
following:
(As per IS 456: 2000, clause 26.5.1.1(a))
Thus, minimum tension reinforcement, As,min = 285.723 mm2< 628.32 mm2

Hence, safe.
2000, clause 26.5.1.1(b))
(As per IS 456:

Hence, ok.
C. Design of shear reinforcement:
= 0.00450
= 2.146 N/mm2
Thus,
c,max =
= 0.4504
c
= 0.47 N/mm2
3.5 N/mm2 (From IS 456: 2000, Table 20)
c< v<
c,max

P a g e | 114
Now, =
= 65565 N
= = 233735 N
stirrups.
Spacing, =
Now,
(From IS 456: 2000, clause 40.4 (a))
= 100.531 mm2
Thus, = 56.991 mm
Thus, = 302.472 mm

Now, 0.75d = 348.75 mm > 300 mm
a) d/4 = 116.25 mm
c/c is adopted.
Detailing diagram for intermediate level beams is shown in Figures 10(c) and
10(d) of Annexure I.

P a g e | 115
DESIGN OF PLINTH LEVEL BEAMS:

Design shear force
= 284.78 kN
Size of beam
= 300 mm x 500 mm
Width/Depth
1993, clause 6.1.2)
= 0.6 > 0.3Hence, ok. (As per IS 13920:
beams i.e. (2900/4)
Effective depth of beam (d) = 500-25-(20/2) = 465 mm, considering 20 mm
diameter bars at the bottom.

= .
= 268.552 kNm

Since,
= 4.6
>
= -298.44 kNm
, hence, section is doubly reinforced.
= 0.08065 (Using 25mm diameter bars at the top)

p (top) = 1.58%

p(bottom) = 0.15%
Required area of reinforcement = 209.25 mm2
P a g e | 116

Since,
= 1.19
<
= 76.95 kNm

p (bottom) = 0.35%
Adopting maximum values,
p(top) = 1.58%
p(bottom) = 0.35%
For the bottom portion, using 20 mm diameter bars,
Hence, 5bars of 25mm diameter are provided at the top portion.
Hence, Ast provided =
Check:
= 2454.375mm2
following:
(As per IS 456: 2000, clause 26.5.1.1(a))
Thus, minimum tension reinforcement, As,min = 285.723 mm2<488.25mm2

Hence, safe.
P a g e | 117

2000, clause 26.5.1.1(b))
(As per IS 456:

Hence, ok.
B. Design of shear reinforcement:
= 0.00450
= 2.041 N/mm2
Thus,
c,max =
= 0.4504
c
= 0.47 N/mm2
3.5 N/mm2 (From IS 456: 2000, Table 20)
c< v<
c,max

Now, =
= 65565 N
= = 219215 N
stirrups.
Spacing, =
Now,
(From IS 456: 2000, clause 40.4 (a))
= 100.531 mm2
Thus, = 60.766 mm

Thus, = 302.472 mm

P a g e | 118
Now, 0.75d = 348.75 mm > 300 mm

a) d/4 = 116.25 mm
c/c is adopted.
Detailing diagrams for plinth level beams are shown in Figures 10(e) and 10(f)
of Annexure I.

P a g e | 119
COLUMN DESIGN
DESIGN OF 6TH STOREY COLUMNS:
Design axial force, Pu
= 138.77 kN
Design moment, Mu
= 94.43 kNm
Let cross section of column be
= 400 mm x 400 mm
l (ex/D), l(ey/b) = 8.25 < 12

Hence, it is a short column. (From IS 456: 2000, 25.1.2)
A) Specifications:
Minimum dimension of columns = 400 mm > 200 mm (From IS 13920:1993,
clause 7.1.2)
Ratio of shortest dimension to perpendicular dimension = 1 < 0.4 Hence, ok.
(From IS 13920:1993, 7.1.3)
B) Longitudinal Reinforcement:
= 0.0289
= 0.0492
Let clear cover = 40 mm

Assuming 20 mm diameter bars,
d' = 40 + 10 = 50 mm
= 0.125
From chart no. 32 of SP 16: 1980,
= 0.1,
= 0.01
= 415,
= 0.15,
= 415,
P a g e | 120
= 0.01
Interpolating between the two values:
= 0.01
Thus, p = 0.3% < 0.8% which is the minimum percentage of steel.

(According to IS 456: 2000, clause 26.5.3.1(a))
Then, area of steel = 1280 mm2
Area of 1 bar of 20 mm diameter = 314.159 mm2
Number of bars required =
= 4.074
Hence, let us provide 6 bars of 20 mm diameter distributed equally on two

sides.
Area of steel provided =

Check:
Longitudinal reinforcement =
= 1884.96 mm2
= 1.178%
which is less than 4%. (According to IS 456: 2000, clause 26.5.3.1(a))

Hence, safe.
C) Transverse reinforcement:
Design shear force, Vu = 41.24 kN
c=
0.7 N/mm2 (According to Table 19of IS 456:2000)
Vc = 98 kN
Since, Vc> Vu
Nominal shear reinforcement is provided.
Using 2 legged 10mm diameter stirrups,
Asv =
= 157.08 mm2
According to IS 456:2000, clause 26.5.1.6:

Minimum shear reinforcement in the form of stirrups is provided such that:

P a g e | 121
Spacing of stirrups, =
= 354.461 mm
Maximum spacing is least of (According to IS 456: 2000, clause 26.5.1.5):

a) 0.75d = 0.75 x (400 50) = 262.5 mm
b) 300 mm
Hence, 10 mm diameter hoops @ 250mm c/c are provided.
But spacing of hoops should not be greater than half the least lateral dimension
of the member i.e. 200 mm.
D) Special confining reinforcement:
Assuming rectangular hoops of 10 mm diameter,
Core size = 400-40-10 -10 = 340 mm
As dimensions exceed 300 mm, so cross ties need to be provided in both the
directions.
As per IS 13920: 1993, clause 7.4.8:
Area of cross section of bar forming rectangular hoop, to be used as special
confining reinforcement shall not be less than:
= .
Here, h =
= 170 mm
Spacing1 of hoops(S) should not exceed:

a) x minimum member dimension = 100 mm
b)
mm
= 90 mm
Thus,
= 76.465 mm2
Area of 10 mm diameter bars =
= 78.54 mm2> 76.46 mm2
Hence, 10 mm diameter bars @ 90 mm c/c spacing is provided.

Length of special confining length shall not be less than:
P a g e | 122
(According to 13920: 1993, clause 7.4.1)

a) Larger lateral dimension of member at the section where yielding occurs
= 400 mm
b)
of clear span of member =
c) 450 mm
= 466.67
Hence, provide lo = 470 mm

Thus, 10mm diameter bars @ 90 mm c/c spacing is provided for a length of 470
mm from either joints in the column.
For the rest of the column length:
Spacing of hoops =
= 200 mm
Thus, 10mm diameter bars @ 200 mm c/c spacing is provided for the rest of the
column length.
Lap splices are provided only in central half portion of member.
Hoops are provided over the entire splice length at a spacing < 200 mm.
Not more than 50% bar shall be spliced at one section.
Detailing diagrams of 6th storey column is shown in Figures 11(a) and 11(b) of
Annexure I.
= 443.58 kN
Design moment, Mu
= 163.23 kNm
= 400 mm x 400 mm
l (ex/D), l(ey/b) = 8.25 < 12

A) Specifications:
clause 7.1.2)
(From IS 13920:1993, 7.1.3)
P a g e | 123
= 0.0924
= 0.0850

d' = 40 + 10 = 50 mm
= 0.125
= 0.1,
= 0.04
= 415,
= 0.15,
= 0.06
= 415,
= 0.05
Thus, p = 1.5% > 0.8% which is the minimum percentage of steel.

= 7.64
Hence, let us provide 8 bars of 20 mm diameter distributed equally on four

sides.
= 2513.28 mm2

P a g e | 124
Check:
.
= 1.5708%
which is greater than 0.8% and less than 4%. (According to IS 456: 2000, clause
26.5.3.1(a))
Hence, safe.
= 0.75N/mm2 (According to Table 19of IS 456:2000)
Vc
= 105 kN
Since, Vc> Vu
Asv =
= 157.08 mm2

= 354.461 mm

c) 0.75d = 0.75 x (400 50) = 262.5 mm
d) 300 mm
Hence, 10 mm diameter hoops @ 250 mm c/c are provided.
Core size = 400-40-10 -10 = 340 mm
P a g e | 125
directions.
As per IS 13920: 1993, clause 7.4.8:
= .
Here, h =
= 170 mm

c) x minimum member dimension = 100 mm
d)
mm
= 90 mm
Thus,
= 76.465 mm2
= 78.54 mm2> 76.46 mm2

d) Larger lateral dimension of member at the section where yielding occurs

= 400 mm
e)
f) 450 mm
= 466.67

Spacing of hoops =
= 200 mm
column length.
P a g e | 126

Detailing diagrams for 5th storey columns are shown in Figures 11(c) and 11(d)
of Annexure I.
= 811.33 kN
Design moment, Mu
= 209.33 kNm
= 400 mm x 400 mm
l (ex/D), l(ey/b) = 8.25 < 12

A) Specifications:
clause 7.1.2)
(From IS 13920:1993, 7.1.3)
= 0.169
= 0.109

d' = 40 + 10 = 50 mm
= 0.125
= 0.1,
= 415,
P a g e | 127
= 0.06
= 0.15,
= 0.06
= 415,
= 0.06

= 9.167

sides.

Check:
= 3769.92 mm2
= 2.356%
26.5.3.1(a))
Hence, safe.
c
Vc

= 124.6 kN
Since, Vc> Vu
P a g e | 128
Asv =
= 157.08 mm2

= 354.461 mm

a) 0.75d = 0.75 x (400 50) = 262.5 mm
b) 300 mm
Core size = 400-40-10 -10 = 340 mm
directions.
As per IS 13920: 1993, clause 7.4.8:
= .
Here, h =
= 170 mm

b)
mm
= 90 mm

P a g e | 129
Thus,
= 76.465 mm2
= 78.54 mm2> 76.46 mm2


= 400 mm
b) of clear span of member =
c) 450 mm
= 466.67

Spacing of hoops =
= 200 mm
column length.
Detailing diagrams for 4th storey columns are shown in Figures 11(e) and 11(f)
of Annexure I.
DESIGN OF 3RD STOREY COLUMNS:
= 1219.11 kN
Design moment, Mu
= 237.27 kNm
= 400 mm x 400 mm
l (ex/D), l(ey/b) = 8.25 < 12

P a g e | 130
A) Specifications:
clause 7.1.2)
(From IS 13920:1993, 7.1.3)
= 0.254
= 0.124

d' = 40 + 12.5 = 52.5 mm
= 0.13125
= 0.1,
= 0.08
= 415,
= 0.15,
= 0.08
= 415,
= 0.08

P a g e | 131
= 7.823

sides.
Check:
= 3927 mm2
= 2.454%
26.5.3.1(a))
Hence, safe.
Vc
= 125.1 kN
Since, Vc< Vu
Shear reinforcement has to be provided.
Vus= Vu - Vc = 2.7 kN
Asv =
= 157.08 mm2

= 354.461 mm

a) 0.75d =0.75 x (400 40 12.5) = 260.625 mm
b) 300 mm
P a g e | 132
Core size = 400-40-12.5 -10 = 337.5 mm
directions.
As per IS 13920: 1993, clause 7.4.8:
= .
Here, h =
= 168.75 mm

b)
mm
= 80 mm
Thus,
= 71.084 mm2
= 78.54 mm2> 71.084 mm2

a) Larger lateral dimension of member at the section where yielding occurs =

400 mm
b) of clear span of member =
c) 450 mm
= 466.67

P a g e | 133
Spacing of hoops =
= 200 mm
column length.
Detailing diagrams for 3rd storey columns are shown in Figures 11(g) and 11(h)
of Annexure I.
DESIGN OF 2ND STOREY COLUMNS:
= 1417.68 kN
Design moment, Mu
= 251.58 kNm
= 400 mm x 400 mm
l (ex/D), l(ey/b) = 8.25 < 12

A) Specifications:
clause 7.1.2)
(From IS 13920:1993, 7.1.3)
= 0.2954
= 0.131

P a g e | 134

d' = 40 + 12.5 = 52.5 mm
= 0.13125
= 0.1,
= 0.1
= 415,
= 0.15,
= 0.1
= 415,
= 0.1
Thus, p = 3% > 0.8% which is the minimum percentage of steel.

= 9.778

sides.

Check:
= 5890.5 mm2
= 3.682%
26.5.3.1(a))
Hence, safe.
P a g e | 135
= 0.96 N/mm2 (According to Table 19of IS 456:2000)
Vc
= 133.44 kN
Since, Vc< Vu
Asv =
= 157.08 mm2

= 354.461 mm

a) 0.75d =0.75 x (400 40 12.5) = 260.625 mm
b) 300 mm
Core size = 400-40-12.5 -10 = 337.5 mm
directions.
As per IS 13920: 1993, clause 7.4.8:
P a g e | 136
= .
Here, h =
= 168.75 mm

b)
mm
= 80 mm
Thus,
= 71.084 mm2
= 78.54 mm2> 71.084 mm2


= 400 mm
b)
c) 450 mm
= 466.67

Spacing of hoops =
= 200 mm
column length.
Detailing diagrams for 2nd storey columns are shown in Figures 11(i) and 11(j)
of Annexure I.
P a g e | 137
DESIGN OF 1ST STOREY COLUMNS:

= 2056.43 kN
Design moment, Mu
= 206.175 kNm
= 400 mm x 400 mm
l (ex/D), l(ey/b) =
= 5.55 < 12

A) Specifications:
clause 7.1.2)
(From IS 13920:1993, 7.1.3)
= 0.4284
= 0.1074

d' = 40 + 12.5 = 52.5 mm
= 0.13125
= 0.1,
= 0.1
= 415,
= 0.15,
= 0.1
= 415,
P a g e | 138
= 0.1
Thus, p = 3% > 0.8% which is the minimum percentage of steel.

= 9.778

sides.

Check:
= 5890.5 mm2
= 3.682%
which is greater than 0.8% and less than 4%? (According to IS 456: 2000,
clause 26.5.3.1(a))
Hence, safe.
= 0.96 N/mm2 (According to Table 19of IS 456:2000)
Vc
= 133.44 kN
Since, Vc< Vu
Asv =
= 157.08 mm2

P a g e | 139
= 354.461 mm

d) 0.75d =0.75 x (400 40 12.5) = 260.625 mm
e) 300 mm
Core size = 400-40-12.5 -10 = 337.5 mm
directions.
As per IS 13920: 1993, clause 7.4.8:
= .
Here, h =
= 168.75 mm

b)
mm
= 80 mm
Thus,
= 71.084 mm2
= 78.54 mm2> 71.084 mm2

P a g e | 140

d) Larger lateral dimension of member at the section where yielding occurs
= 400 mm
e)
f) 450 mm
= 466.67

Spacing of hoops =
= 200 mm
column length.
Detailing diagrams for1st storey columns are shown in Figures 11(k) and 11(l)
of Annexure I.

P a g e | 141
STAIRCASE DESIGN
Details
Rise= 137.5 mm
Size of tread =250 mm
Height of each floor = 3.3 m
Flight provided = 3
Height of each flight = 1.1 m
Total number of rise provided = 24
Number of rise in a flight = 8
Number of steps in each flight = 8-1 = 7
Thickness of wall = 300 mm
Live load = 2.5 KN/m2
Grade of concrete = M30
Grade of steel = Fe415
Effective span
(Assuming a bearing of 150 mm in the walls)
For Flight AB
Elevation- 0.0 TO 1.1 m
L = (7 x 250) + 1000 + 150 x 2
L = 3050 mm
L =3.05 m
For Flight BC
ELEVATION 1.1 TO 2.2 m
L = 7 x250 + 1000 x2 + 150 x 2
L= 4050 mm
L =4.05 m
Load Calculations
Let the thickness of waist slab be 120 mm
Let the thickness of landing slab be 120 mm
P a g e | 142
FLIGHT PORTION
Self-weight of waist slab = 0.12 x sec (28.81) x 25
= 3.42 KN/m2
Self-weight of step = (0. 5 x .175 x 0.25 x (25/.25))
= 1.72 KN/m2
Finishing Load= 2.5 KN/m2
Live load = 2.5KN/m2
Total Load =3.42 +1.72+2.5+2.5
= 10.14 KN/m2
For unit Width,
Total load
= 10.14 KN/m
LANDING PORTION
Self- weight of slab
= 0.12X 25
= 3KN/m2
Finishing load
= 2.5 KN/m2
Live load
= 2.5KN/m2
Total load
= 8KN/m2
For unit Width,

Total design load
= 8KN/m
Note: Each quarter space landing is common to both flights; hence only half of the
landing load, i.e. 4 KN/m will be taken.
Design of Flight AB
RA = 14.13 KN
RB = 9.74 KN
Shear force is Zero at 14.13/ 10.14 = 1.4 m from A
Maximum Moment will be 1.4 m from A = (14.13 x 1.4) (10.14X 1.42/2)
= 9.84 KN-m
Hence, design bending moment = (1.5x9.84 x 106) =14.76x106 N-mm
Check for bending moment
M = 0.138fckbd2
P a g e | 143
d = (14.76 x 106)/ (0.138 x 1000 x 30)

= 59 mm < (120-20) =100 mm, Hence OK.
d = 100 mm
Main reinforcement
= .
= 283.5 mm2
[ { ( .
)}]
Providing 8mm diameter Main Bars

Spacing =1000 x 50.26 / 283.5
= 177 mm
Hence provide 8 mm Diameter bars @ 175 mm center to center.
Distribution reinforcement
Ast = 1.2 x D
Ast = 144 mm2
Hence provide 8 mm diameter bars 300 mm center to center.
Nominal shear stress
Steel provided (%) = 100 Ast / bD
= .236
c
=0.359 N/ mm2
=V /bd
= .1413 N/mm2 <0.359 N / mm2
Hence ok
Design of Flight BC
RB = Rc = 13.47 KN
Maximum Bending Moment = 16.72 KN-m
Hence, design bending moment = (1.5x 16.72 x 106 )= (25x106 N mm)
Check for bending moment
M = 0.138Fckbd2
d (req.) =78 mm < 100 mm
Hence ok.
P a g e | 144
Main Reinforcement
= .
[ { ( .
)}]
Ast= 497.57 mm2

Providing 8 mm diameter Main bars
Spacing = 101 mm
Hence provide 8 mm diameter bars @ 100 mm center to center.
Distribution reinforcement
Ast = 144 mm2
Hence provide 8 mm diameter bars 300 mm center to center.
Nominal shear stress
Steel provided (%) = 100 Ast / bD
= 0.415
c
=0.456 N/ mm2
= V /bd
= .1347N/mm2 <0.456 N / mm2
Hence ok.
Diagrams showing plan of staircase, first flight and second flight are shown in Figures
12(a), 12(b) and 12(c) of Annexure I respectively.

P a g e | 145
FOOTING DESIGN
Type of foundation - Raft foundation
Bearing capacity of soil at 1.5 m below ground level= 160KN/m2
Number of columns= 32
Size of the columns= 400mmx400mm
Factored load coming from each column= 2056.43 KN
Hence, total vertical load (P) = 2056.43x32= 65,805.76 KN
Size of the raft (assumed) =34.4mx13.7m=471.28 m2 (Considering projection
of 1.7 m on all sides)
Grade of concrete used= M30
Steel reinforcement used= Fe415
Eccentricity along the x direction is obtained by taking moment of column loads
about the grid 11(Figure 13(a) Annexure I):
X0=[{5.4+(5.4+3.025)+(5.4+3.025+5)+(5.4+3.025+5+4.15)+(5.4+3.025+5+4.1
5+5)+(5.4+3.025+5+4.15+5+3.025)+(5.4+3.025+5+4.15+5+3.025+5.4)}x4x20
56.43]/65805.76
=15.5 m
ex=15.5-0.5 x (5.4+3.025+5+4.15+5+3.025+5.4)
=0
Eccentricity along the y direction is obtained by taking moment of column loads
about the grid D-D
Y0= [{3.9+ (3.9+3) + (3.9+3+3.4)} x 8 x 2056.43]/65805.76
=5.275 m
ey= 5.275-0.5 x (3.9+3+3.4)
=0.125m
P a g e | 146
IX= (34.4 x 13.73)/12

=7371.22 m4
IY= (13.7 x 34.43)/12
=46474.49 m4
=
= 65,805.76 x 0.125=8225.72 KNm
=0
= 65805.76/471.28=139.63 KN/m2
At corner A-8 or A-1 (applied pressure) (y=6.7m)

=
=139.63+ (7.48)
=147.11 KN/m2<160 KN/m2

Hence, safe.
At corner =D-8 or D-1 (applied pressure) (y=-6.7m)
=139.63- (7.48)
=132.15 KN/m2<160 KN/m2

Hence, safe.
Taking maximum of the above two soil pressures
max=w=147.11
KN/m2
In the x direction, the raft is divided in four strips, that is four equivalent beams
Considering the maximum soil pressure value

P a g e | 147
(Lx is the maximum centre to centre distance
Design Maximum moment =

between columns)
In our case LX= 5.4 m
Hence, design moment (MD) =
=428.97 KNm
For any strip in the y direction, take M=

centre distance between columns.)
(Ly is the maximum centre to
In our case LY=3.9 m

Hence, moment (MY) = (147.11 x 3.92)/8
=279.69 KNm
The depth of the raft is governed by two-way shear at one of the exterior
columns. If the location of critical shear is not obvious, it may be necessary to
check all possible locations
Shear strength of concrete ( c)= .
=0.25 x (30)0.5
=1.37 N/mm2
For a corner column, say D-1
Perimeter bo= 2(0.5d+1900)
= d+ 3800 mm
Shear stress ( v) =
=1.37
= (2056.43 x 1000)/ (d2+3800d) =1.37

Solving the above equation, we get
d= 360.76 mm
For a corner column say A-2
Perimeter bo= 2(0.5d+1900) + (d+400)
= 2d+ 4200 mm

P a g e | 148
Shear stress ( v) =
= c=1.37
= (2056.43 x 1000)/ (2d2+4200d) =1.37

Solving the above equation, we get
d= 311.26 mm
Hence, adopt an effective depth of d=380 mm and overall depth of D =
(380+50+12.5) =442.5 mm
Reinforcement in the raft is given by considering 1m wide strip and maximum
moment obtained above:
[ { ( .
= .
)}]
Substituting all the values i.e fck=30, fy=415, MD=428.97 x 106, b=1000 mm and
d=380 mm
Hence, At= 3599.97 mm2
Using 25 mm diameter bars, number of bars required per meter length of the
footing =
=7.3
4
Spacing of bars =
= 136.35 mm
Hence, provide 8-25mm bars per meter length @135 mm c/c at top and
bottom in both the directions
For shear force considerations, provide 4 legged 8mm stirrups in the critical
shear locations...i.e. under each column.
Figures showing plan of raft and beam column junction at raft are shown in
Figures 13(a) and 13(b) respectively of Annexure I.

P a g e | 149
STAAD PRO DESIGN
Front view of building as seen in Staad Pro is shown below:
Figure A1: Front view of Staad Pro Design

P a g e | 150
Top view of building as seen in Staad Pro is shown below:
Figure A2: Top View of Staad Pro Design

Primary load cases considered are shown below:
Table 46: Table showing primary load cases for Staad Pro

P a g e | 151
Combination Load Cases are shown below:

Table 47: Combination load cases for Staad Pro

P a g e | 152
Reaction Envelopes obtained are shown below:

Table 48: Table showing reaction envelopes

P a g e | 153

P a g e | 154

P a g e | 155
Results for design of roof beam are shown below:

P a g e | 156
Results for design of 1st floor beam are shown below:

P a g e | 157
Results for design of 5th level column are shown below:

P a g e | 158
Results for design of ground level column are shown below:

P a g e | 159
CONCLUSION
In the project entitled Analysis and design of a Six Storied Residential Building
with Three Bedroom Flats, a structure of six stories is planned, analysed and
designed. Load calculation is done on the respective beams, columns and
footings. For dead load and live load, the frame is analysed by Substitute frame
Method, an approximate method which uses the Moment Distribution Method.
For earthquake and wind load analysis, the approximate portal frame method is
used. The load combinations are determined and out of them, the critical values
are taken in the design of the elements. The design is done by the Limit State
Method according to Indian Standard Code provisions. The detailing finally
shows the final positioning of the various elements of the structure.
The final design is compared with the design obtained from STAAD Pro. The
considerable variation of results obtained is due to usage of approximate
methods. However, the design and detailing of structures is done based on the
manual calculation only.

P a g e | 160
REFERENCES
o Gambhir, M. L.; Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures.
o Punmia, B. C., Jain, Ashok Kumar and Jain, Arun Kumar; Limit
State Design of Reinforced Concrete.
o Menon, Devdas and Pillai, Unnikrishna; Reinforced Concrete
Design
o Shrikhande, Manish and Agarwal, Pankaj; Earthquake Resistant
Design of Structures
o Ramamrutham, S. and Narayan, R; Theory of Structures
o IS 456:2000: Plain an Reinforced Concrete- Code of Practice
o IS 1893 (part 1):2002: Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of
Structures.
o IS 875 (Part 3): Code for practice for design loads (other than
earthquake) for buildings and structures (Wind Load).
o SP 16:1980: Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS 456:1978
[CED 2: Cementand Concrete].
o IS 13920:1993: Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures
subjected toseismic forces - Code of practice [CED 39: Earthquake
Engineering]

P a g e | 161
ANNEXURE I

P a g e | 162
Figure 1: Diagram showing Building Plan along with schedule

(All dimensions are in metres)

P a g e | 163
Figure 2: Diagram showing Front View Elevation of Building


P a g e | 164
Figure 3(a): Diagram showing Side View Elevation of Building


P a g e | 165
Figure 3(b): Diagram showing Beam Column Layout

(All dimensions are in metres and beams are shown in blue colour)

P a g e | 166
Figure 4(a): Detailing diagram for slab S1 (Roof Level)
Figure 4(b): Detailing diagram of slab S2 (Roof Level)

P a g e | 167
Figure 4(c): Detailing diagram of Slab S3 (Roof Level)
Figure 4(d): Detailing diagram of Slab S4 (Roof Level)

P a g e | 168
Figure 4(e): Detailing diagram for Slab S5 (Roof Level)
Figure 4(f): Detailing diagram of Slab S6 (Roof Level)

P a g e | 169
Figure 4(g): Detailing diagram of slab S7 (Roof Level)
Figure 4(h): Detailing diagram of Slab S8 (Roof Level)

P a g e | 170
Figure 4(i): Detailing diagram of Slab S9 (Roof Level)
Figure 5(a): Detailing diagram of Slab S1 (Intermediate Floor Level)

P a g e | 171
Figure 5(b): Detailing diagram of Slab S2 (Intermediate Floor Level)
Figure 5(c): Detailing diagram of Slab S3 (Intermediate Floor Level)

P a g e | 172
Figure 5(d): Detailing diagram for Slab S4 (Intermediate Floor Level).
Figure 5(e): Detailing diagram of Slab S5 (Intermediate Floor Level)

P a g e | 173
Figure 5(f): Detailing diagram of Slab S6 (Intermediate Floor Level)
Figure 5(g): Detailing diagram of Slab S7 (Intermediate Floor Level)

P a g e | 174
Figure 5(h): Detailing diagram of Slab S8 (Intermediate Floor Level)
Figure 5(i): Detailing diagram of Slab S9 (Intermediate Floor Level)

P a g e | 175
Figure 6(a): Bending Moment diagram for Live Load in beams (Frame 1)
Figure 6(b): Bending Moment diagram for Live Load in columns (Frame 1)

P a g e | 176
Figure 6(c): Shear Force diagram for Live Load in beams (Frame 1)
Figure 7(a): Bending Moment diagram for Dead Load in beams (Frame 1)

P a g e | 177
Figure 7(b): Bending Moment diagram for Dead Load in columns (Frame 1)
Figure 7(c): Shear Force diagram for Dead Load in columns (Frame 1)

P a g e | 178
Figure 8(a): Diagram showing Lateral Forces acting on Frame 1(Seismic Load)
Figure 8(b): Diagram showing Lateral Forces acting on Frame 2 (Seismic Load)

P a g e | 179
Figure 8(c): Diagram showing Bending Moment acting on beams and columns for Frame 1 (Seismic Load)
Figure 8(d): Diagram showing Bending Moment acting on beams and columns for Frame 2 (Seismic Load)

P a g e | 180
Figure 8(e): Diagram showing Shear Force acting on beams for Frame 1 (Seismic Load)
Figure 8(f): Diagram showing Shear Force acting on beams for Frame 2 (Seismic Load)

P a g e | 181
Figure 9(a): Diagram showing Lateral Wind Load acting on Frame 2 (Wind Load)
Figure 9(b): Diagram showing Bending Moment acting on beams and columns for Frame 2 (Wind Load)
P a g e | 182
Figure 9(c): Diagram showing Shear Force acting on beams for Frame 2 (Wind Load)
Figure 10(a): Cross section of roof level beam

P a g e | 183
Figure 10(b): Beam Column Junction at roof level
Figure 10(c): Cross section of intermediate level beam

P a g e | 184
Figure 10(d): Beam Column Junction at roof level
Figure 10(e): Cross section of intermediate level beam

P a g e | 185
Figure 10(f): Beam Column Junction at roof level
Figure 11(a): Cross section of 6th storey column

P a g e | 186
Figure 11(b): Beam Column Junction of 6th Storey columns
Figure 11(c): Cross section of 5th storey column

P a g e | 187
Figure 11(d): Beam Column Junction of 5th Storey columns
Figure 11(e): Cross sectional area of 4th storey column

P a g e | 188
Figure 11(f): Beam Column Junction of 4th storey column
Figure 11(g): Cross section of 3rd storey column

P a g e | 189
Figure 11(h): Beam Column Junction of 3rd storey columns
Figure 11(i): Cross section of 2nd storey column

P a g e | 190
Figure 11(j): Beam Column Junction of 2nd storey columns
Figure 11(k): Cross section of 1st storey column

P a g e | 191
Figure 11(l): Beam Column Junction of 1st storey columns
Figure 12(a): Figure showing plan of staircase

P a g e | 192
Figure 12(b): Figure showing first flight of stairs

P a g e | 193
Figure 12(c): Figure showing second flight of stairs
Figure 13(a): Figure showing Plan of Raft Footing

P a g e | 194
Figure 13(b): Figure showing cross section of Raft Footing


BP Final Report

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

BP Final Report

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF A SIX STORIED

RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH THREE BEDROOM

Department of Civil Engineering

Rohitashav Agarwal (13-1-1-057)

Mrigakshee Sarmah (13-1-1-058)

Bhawarnab Gautam (13-1-1-059)

Brijesh Singh Satyal (13-1-1-060)

Dr. Upendra Kumar

Dr. M. L. Vara Prasad

Dr. Debjit Bhowmik

Department of Civil Engineering

Department of Civil Engineering

Table 8: Shear force in beams for LL

Table 36: Load combinations for 4th floor beams

Department of Civil Engineering

Department of Civil Engineering

Department of Civil Engineering

Figure 11(g): Cross section of 3rd storey column

Department of Civil Engineering

Department of Civil Engineering

Keywords: Reinforced concrete design, wind analysis, seismic analysis, load

Department of Civil Engineering

3. The Limit State Method

Moment Distribution Method:

Department of Civil Engineering

Where, n is the number of members framed at the joint.

Substitute Frame Method (Two cycle Method):

design approach. It is written for use in India. It gives extensive information on

Department of Civil Engineering

PRELIMINARY DESIGN DATA

6 storied RCC rigid jointed frame structure (G + 5)

According to IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002

Wind load analysis:

According to IS: 875 (Part 3) : 1987

According to IS 13920: 1993

Wind speed 55 m/s on plain terrain.

HYSD of grade Fe 415

120 mm for all floors including roof.

Department of Civil Engineering

Along shorter span:

= 40.7 mm < 100 mm

Hence, depth provided is safe.

Width of edge strip =

Department of Civil Engineering

Available depth = D 15 5 = 100 mm

Check for spacing:

Spacing should not be greater than the lesser of:

Ast provided for middle strip =

= 261.8 mm2> 147.267 mm2

Provided spacing as per previous requirements = 300 mm

Hence, Ast provided for edge strip =

Alternate bottom bars are curtailed at distance of 0.15 x Ly = 765.75 mm from

Steel required for middle strip, Ast =

Department of Civil Engineering

Spacing required for middle strip =

Providing spacing of 300 mm as per previous requirements, A st provided =

= 261.8 mm2> 89.758 mm2

Providing 300 mm spacing, Ast provided for edge strip =

Alternate bottom bars are curtailed at distance of 0.15 x Lx = 465.75 mm from

(From IS 456: 2000, clause 23.2.1, figure 4)

Detailing diagram for slab S1 is given in Figure 4(a) of Annexure I.

Department of Civil Engineering

SLAB S2 (FOR ROOF LEVEL)