Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
AP
ijpam.eu
Correspondence
author
492
a1 + 4a2 + a3
6
493
< I T (B)
(i) I T (A)
494
xa1
a2 a1
a3 x
a3 a2
f or a1 x a2
f or a2 x a3
Otherwise
a2 x
a2 a1
xa2
a3 a2
f or a1 x a2
AI (x) =
AI (x) =
f or a2 x a3
Otherwise
(a1 , a2 , a3 ; a1 , a2 , a3 )
Let a
I = (a1 , a2 , a3 ; a1 , a2 , a3 ) and bI = (b1 , b2 , b3 ; b1 , b2 , b3 ) two triangular intuitionistic fuzzy number then the arithmetic operations on a
I and bI as follows:
Addition: a
I bI = (a1 + b1 , a2 + b2 , a3 + b3 ; a1 + b1 , a2 + b2 , a3 + b3 ).
Subtraction: a
I bI = (a1 b3 , a2 b2 , a3 b1 ; a1 b3 , a2 b2 , a3 b1 ),
Multiplication: a
I bI = (a1 b1 , a2 b2 , a3 b3 ; a1 b1 , a2 b2 , a3 b3 ),
Scalar Multiplication:
495
a+b
2
0
0
I
(ii) Left integral value of the non - membership function of A is given by
Z 1
Z 1
e+b
I
1
IL (A ) =
L (h) dh =
(b (b e)h) dh =
2
0
0
IL (AI ) =
L1
(h) dh
(b + (b a)h) dh =
(c (c b)h) dh =
R (h) dh =
IR (A ) =
2
0
0
(iv)Right integral value of the non - membership function of AI is given by
Z 1
Z 1
b+f
1
I
(b + (f b)h) dh =
R (h) dh =
IR (A ) =
2
0
0
The total integral value of the membership function of AI is given by
b+c
a+b
1
I
IT (A ) =
+ (1 )
= [(1 )a + b + c]
2
2
2
The total integral value of the non - membership function of AI is given by
e+b
1
f +b
I
+ (1 )
= [(1 )e + b + f ].
IT (A ) =
2
2
2
496
497
D1
D2
D3
D4
Supply
S1
13
20
25
8
(3,8,10)
S2
50
20
25
45
(6,10,13)
S3
25
6
55
10
(8,11,15)
Demend (2,4,7) (5,7,10) (3,6,8) (7,12,13)
When applying the above algorithm and ranking procedure, we get the
optimum solution for fuzzy transportation problem.
D1
D2
D3
D4
Supply
S1
13
20
25
8
(3,8,10)
(2,4,7)
(-4,4,8)
S2
50
20
25
45
(6,10,13)
(-2,4,10) (3,6,8)
S3
25
6
55
10
(8,11,15)
(-5,3,12)
(-1,8,17)
Demend (2,4,7) (5,7,10) (3,6,8) (7,12,13)
The fuzzy optimal solution for the given fuzzy transportation problem is
(11, 412, 797), and the crisp value is 405.67.
6. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Transportation Problem (IFTP)
Consider a transportation with m Intuitionistic Fuzzy (IF) origins and n IF
destination. Let Cij (i = 1, 2, , m, j = 1, 2, , n) be the cost of transporting one unit of the product form ith origin to jth destination .Let a
Ii (i =
1, 2, , m) be the quantity of commodity available at IF origin i . Let bIj
(j = 1, 2, , n) be the quantity of commodity needed of IF destination j . Let
Xij (i = 1, 2, , m, j = 1, 2, , n) is quantity transported from ith IF origin
to j th destination.
Mathematical Model of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Transportation Problem is
miniZjI =
m X
n
X
x
Iij cIij ,
i=1 j=1
n
X
x
Iij = a
Ii ,
n
X
x
Iij = bIj ,
i=1
i=1
x
Ij
498
D1
13
50
25
(2,4,7;1,4,9)
D2
20
20
6
(5,7,10;3,7,12)
D3
25
25
55
(3,6,8;2,6,10)
D4
8
45
10
(7,12,13;6,12,15)
Supply
(3,8,10;2,8,13)
(6,10,13;4,10,15)
(8,11,15;6,11,18)
When applying the above algorithm and ranking procedure, we get the
optimum solution for intuitionistic fuzzy transportation problem.
S2
D1
13
(2,4,7;1,4,9)
50
S3
25
Demend
(2,4,7;1,4,9)
S1
D2
20
D3
25
20
(-2,4,10;-6,4,13)
6
(-5,3,12;-10,3,18)
(5,7,10;3,7,12)
25
(3,6,8;2,6,10)
55
(3,6,8;2,6,10)
D4
8
(-4,4,8;-7,4,12)
45
10
(-1,8,17;-6,8,22)
(7,12,13;6,12,15)
Supply
(3,8,10;2,8,13)
(6,10,13;4,10,15)
(8,11,15;6,11,18)
Step 8: The optimal solution for the given intuitionistic fuzzy transportation problem is (11, 412, 797; 233, 412, 1051), and the crisp value is 406.5.
7. Conclusions
The new average method provides an optimal solution in less number of iterations, directly for a given intuitionistic fuzzy transportation problem. Also this
method required less number of time and is very easy to understand and apply.
So it will be very helpful for decision makers who are dealing with logistic and
supply chain problem.
References
[1] Atanassov.K.T., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986,
87-96.
[2] Deng-Feng-Li, A note on Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for fault - tree
analysis on printed circuit board assembly, Micro Electronics Reliability,
2008, 48, 1741.
499
[3] Ezhil Vannan.S, Rekha.S, A New Method for Obtaining an Optimal Solution for Transportation Problems, IJEAT, Vol- 2, Issue - 2, June 2013,
369-371.
[4] Mahapatra.G.S., and Roy.T.K., Reliability Evaluation using Triangular
Intuitionistic Fuzzy numbers Arithmetic operations, World Academy of
science, Engineering and Technology 2009, 50, 574-581.
[5] Nagoor Gani.A and Ponnalagu.K , Solving Linear Programming Problem
in an Intuitionistic Environment , Proceedings of the Heber international
conference on Applications of Mathematics and Statistics, HICAMS 5-7
Jan 2012.
[6] Nagoor Gani.A and Ponnalagu.K , A New Approach on Solving Intuitionistic Fuzzy Linear Programming Problem, Applied Mathematical Sciences,
Vol. 6, 2012, no. 70, 3467 - 3474
[7] Nagoor Gani.A and Abbas.S, Solving Intuitionistic Fuzzy Transportation
Problem Using Zero Suffix Algorithm, IJMSEA, Vol. 6 No. III, May- 2012,
73-82.
[8] Sudhakar.V.J., Arunsankar.N and Karpagam.T, A New approach for finding an Optimal solution for transportation Problems. European journal of
scientific Research, vol 68, pp.254-257, 2012.
[9] Xinfan Wang, Fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy arithmetic aggregation
operators, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2008, vol.10, (2), 104111.
500