Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
lat
50
120
117
252
332
194.122
-300
-136.2
-169.96
618.063
dep
N
231.3454 10000.00
519.6152 10194.12
267.302 9894.12
-523.081 9757.92
-328.63 9587.97
10206.03
E
1
1
1
1
1
1
REC
9.25532
1/9.2
0
302
902
1202
1752
2452
CorrN
0
-25.3755
-75.7903
-100.998
-147.211
-206.029
CorrE
0
10000
-20.513 10168.75
-61.268 9818.33
-81.646 9656.93
-119 9440.75
-166.55 10000.00
E
10000
10210.83
10689.69
10936.62
10376.18
10000.00
270.047
593.378
294.997
600.686
673.992
adjusted to
output
quadrants
51.32683
51.33 N
-53.8045
126.20 S
-56.829
123.17 S
68.90736
248.91 S
-33.9268
326.07 N
10000
9982.64
9656.93 10936.62
9674.29
11035.1
EP
10000
9901.52
Lecture 4 and 5,
HW2 Horizontal Route Design
Process:
1. Extend AZin at BP for first route tangent, choose TTLin to PI1
2. Compute the cartesians N/E at PI1
3. Choose the DELTA angle at PI1 and the TTLin to PI2
4. Compute the cartesians N/E at PI2
5. Continue choosing DELTAs and TTLs for additional PIs
6. Extend the last route tangent back from EP on AZ of pavement, choose TTLin to EP
7. Compute cartesian N/E of PIlast
8. Compute AZin and TTLin to PIlast (AZ = atan((Elast-E3)/(Nlast-N3)) TTL by dist form.
9. Compute DELTA3, DELTAlast, remaining AZins and AZouts.
Process for Curve Design and Calc. (cont.)
10. Choose the Degree of Curve D, make same for all curves.
11. Calculate the curve Radius R (should be same all curves)
12. Calculate the curve Tangent Length (from PI to PC or PI to PT)
13. Calculate the curve Length (either formula OK)
14. Calculate the PC Northings and Eastings
15. Calculate the PT Northings and Eastings
16. Add PCs and PTs to Excel Chart
17. Inspect chart for overlaps between curves or at BP/EP
18. Modify design to eliminate overlaps. Yes, overlaps at D=30, increase D=60. OK, No overlaps.
(des. choices are shown in green, pink quantities are given (entered), all others are calculated)
Tangent Design
PI Name
BP
PI1
PI2
PI3
Pilast
EP
N
10000
10043.4 9808.49 9635.284
9639.56
9656.9 N2=N1+TTLin*cos(AZIi
E
10000
10246.2 10331.7 10431.71
10838.1
10936.6 E2=E1+TTLin*sin(AZin)
AZin
80
80
160
150
89.3969
80.00 AZin = previoius AZout
Total dist from PI to
TTLin
250
250
200
406.452
100.00 PI
DELTA
(signed)
80
-10 -60.6031
-9.39689
deflection ang. at PI
Azout
80
160
150 89.39689
80
AZout=AZin+DELTA
Curve Design
DELTA (abs)
D Deg Curve
R Radius
T Tangent
L Length
L Length (alternate
method)
N PC
E PC
N PT
E PT
E External Dist
LC Long Chord
M Middle Ordinate
TLin Tangent Len.
Stations
PC Sta
PT Sta
PI Sta
1000
80
25
229.183
192.307
320
10
25
229.183
20.0509
40
60.60311
25
229.1831
133.9321
242.4124
9.39689
25
229.183
18.836
37.5876
320
10010
10056.8
9862.7
40
9827.33
10324.8
9791.12
242.4124
9751.272
10364.74
9636.694
37.5876
9639.36
10819.3
9642.83
L=DELTA/D*100
NPC=NPI+T*cos(AZin+
EPC=EPI+T*sin(AZin+1
NPT=NPI+T*cos(AZout
10312
69.9942
294.632
53.6187
57.6925
10341.7
0.87544
39.9492
0.87211
37.6416
10565.63
36.26503
231.2692
31.31057
46.01693
10856.7
0.77274
37.5454
0.77014
253.684
EPT=EPI+T*sin(AZout)
E=sqrt(R^2+T^2)-R
LC=2R*sin(DELTA/2)
M=R(1-cos(DELTA/2))
81.16 TL=TTL1-T1, TTL2-T1-
1057.69
1377.69
1250
1415.33 1501.351
1455.33 1743.764
1435.39 1635.283
1997.45
2035.03
2016.28
In addition to iterating the design choice of D, we iterate the design choice of TTLs.
By reducing the TTLs, we were able to reduce the D value to 25 and still have positive Tangent Lengths TLs
No overlaps between curves. The iteration of TTLs and D could continue to lower D values.
Now, lets copy the above formulas and delete PI2 and PI3, then iterate TTLs and D to minimize D
PI Name
BP
PI1
Pilast
EP
N
10000
E
10000
AZin
80
TTLin
DELTA
(signed)
Azout
80
Curve Design
DELTA (abs)
D Deg Curve
R Radius
T Tangent
L Length
L Length (alternate
method)
N PC
E PC
N PT
10050.4
10285.6
80
290
9604.83
10641.2
141.406
570.027
61.4061
141.406
-61.406
80
61.4061
12
477.465
283.532
511.718
61.4061
12
477.465
283.532
511.718
511.718
10001.1
10006.4
9828.75
511.718
9826.44
10464.3
9654.07
E PT
E External Dist
LC Long Chord
M Middle Ordinate
TLin Tangent Len.
Stations
PC Sta
PT Sta
10462.5
77.8398
487.576
66.9286
6.46769
10920.4
77.8398
487.576
66.9286
2.96209
1006.47
1518.19
1521.15
2032.86
1000
9656.9
10936.6
80.00
300.00
16.47
2049.33
Result: By eliminating PI2 and PI3, and iterating the TTLs and D, we got to a Dmin=12.
HW3
EPsta
20+49.33 (the only thing carried over from HW2)
Process:
1. Do "location survey" -- set the stakes in the field.
2. Field "profile survey" of extisting ground along the baseline
Returned Field Notes:
Point
Sta
Elev
pvt pt
9+00.
98
BP pavt
10+00.
100
gd at
stake
11+00.
103
gd at
stake
12+00.
110
gd at
stake
13+00.
108
gd at
stake
14+00.
104
gd at
stake
15+00.
95
gd at
stake
16+00.
92
gd at
stake
17+00.
90
gd at
stake
18+00.
92
gd at
stake
19+00.
94
gd at
stake
20+00.
96
HW2sta
EP pavt
20+49.33
98
pvt pt
21+49.33
95
3. Plot the Existing Ground Profile drawing to scale:
Pick Hscale (100 ft/in typical) and Hscale (5 ft/in typical)
4. Calculate the % grade of the PB and EP pavt.
%grade = (rise or fall in ft/run in ft)*100
BP Pvt
rise/fall
run
%grade
BP Pvt
2
100
2 positive
EP Pvt
-3
100
-3 negative
PVT2
PVClast
PVTlast
EP
15.00
16.00
16.70
17.00
18.00
19.00
20.00
20.30
20.49
1500.00
1600.00
1670.00
1700.00
1800.00
1900.00
2000.00
2030.00
2049.33
102.31
102.57
102.96
103.09
102.86
101.64
99.44
98.58
98
95
92
90
92
94
96
98
Result: With the original design choices, we meet all design criteria of K and %grade but we have over
13 ft of fill at Station 17, exceeding the 10' max design goal.
Now, attempt to iterate the design to bring this under 10 ft of fill
I lowered the design choice of Elev PVI2 from 102 down to 94. Good, now less than 10 ft fill
BUT, lowering this elevation increased the A values, which lowered the L values less than 100.
No good. We need to continue iterating to try and reach all design goals.
If can't do so, relax cut/fill height design criteria -- it's only money.
EP 20+49.33
-40
90
-40
100
0
92
0
98
40
89
40
101
2. Eventually plot existing ground cross sections (#5 below)
3. Note and Plot "Profile Grade" at each section -- from HW3 -- top center of finished pavement
4. Design "typical section" -- repeating geometric features throughout the project
Example for a 2-lane road:
slp 10%
lt
sideslope lt shldr
10 ft
crown2% crown2%
slp 10%
2:1 slope
left pavt
rt shldr
rt sideslope
12 ft
rt pavt
profile gr
w=12ft
10 ft
slope limit c
2
1
pavt box 1.5' deep
slope limit fill
BL
5. Apply typical section specifications to each cross section 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, EP
(see below). Make composite chart -- existing ground, applied typical section.
6. Compute area of closed polygon -- end area-- cut or fill. List offset/elevations in chart.
Go clockwise or CCW around polygon repeating the first line at the bottom.
Sta
10+00
Profile Grade
Elev
-42
-22
-12
20 ft horiz, +10 ft
108.76 vert
98.76 lt eop-0.1*10
99.76 lt bot bo+1.5
100
Calc
area.
L Bot Bx
Bot Pvt Bx
R Bot Bx
R EOP
R EOSh
R sideslp
-12
0
12
12
22
42
98.26
98.5
98.26
99.76
98.76
108.76
bot box-.02*12
prof grade-1.5
bot box-.02*12
rt bot box+1.5
rt eop-.0.1*10
20' horiz, +10' vert
L Slp Lim
L EOSh.
L EOP
L Bot Bx
Bot Pvt Bx
R Bot Bx
R EOP
R EOSh
R Slp Lim
grd pt
L Slp Lim
-28
-22
-12
-12
0
12
12
22
32
0
-28
102.7 RHProd
98.76 -2765.28
99.76 -2194.72
98.26 -1179.12
98.5
-1182
98.26
0
99.76
1197.12
98.76
1185.12
104.2
2292.4
100
3200
102.7
0
274.52 SumLH
SumRH
Area= abs(.5*Diff in Sums)
Sta
12+00
553.52
139.5
CUT AREA
Profile Grade
Elev
-42
-22
-12
-12
0
12
12
22
42
111.76
101.76
102.76
101.26
101.5
101.26
102.76
101.76
111.76
20 ft horiz, +10 ft
vert
lt eop-0.1*10
lt bot bo+1.5
bot box-.02*12
prof grade-1.5
bot box-.02*12
rt bot box+1.5
rt eop-.0.1*10
20' horiz, +10' vert
L Slp Lim
L EOSh.
L EOP
L Bot Bx
Bot Pvt Bx
R Bot Bx
-37
-22
-12
-12
0
12
108.5 RHProd
101.76 -3765.12
102.76 -2260.72
101.26 -1215.12
101.5
-1218
101.26
0
103
1215.1
2260.7
3968.6
0
-4070
R EOP
R EOSh
R Slp Lim
grd pt
L Slp Lim
12
22
39
0
-37
102.76
101.76
111
110
108.5
-248.8 SumLH
SumRH
Area= abs(.5*Diff in Sums)
Sta
14+00
1233.12
1221.12
2442
4290
0
727.28
488.02
CUT AREA
Profile Grade
102.67
Elev
-42
-22
-12
-12
0
12
12
22
42
111.427
101.427
102.427
100.927
101.17
100.927
102.427
101.427
111.427
20 ft horiz, +10 ft
vert
lt eop-0.1*10
lt bot bo+1.5
bot box-.02*12
prof grade-1.5
bot box-.02*12
rt bot box+1.5
rt eop-.0.1*10
20' horiz, +10' vert
L Slp Lim
L EOSh.
L EOP
L Bot Bx
Bot Pvt Bx
R Bot Bx
R EOP
R EOSh
R Slp Lim
grd pt
L Slp Lim
-25
-22
-12
-12
0
12
12
22
26
0
-25
102.3 RHProd
101.427 -2535.67
102.427 -2253.39
100.927 -1211.12
101.17
-1214
100.927
0
102.427 1229.12
101.427 1217.12
102.9
2263.8
104
2704
102.3
0
18.76 SumLH
SumRH
Area= abs(.5*Diff in Sums)
Sta
16+00
199.8667
90.55333
CUT AREA
Profile Grade
90
102.57
0
40
92
95
Proposed Surface
Point
Offset
L sideslp
L EOSh.
L EOP
L Bot Bx
Bot Pvt Bx
R Bot Bx
R EOP
R EOSh
R sideslp
-42
-22
-12
-12
0
12
12
22
42
Elev
91.3257
101.326
102.326
100.826
101.07
100.826
102.326
101.326
91.3257
L Slp Lim
L EOSh.
L EOP
L Bot Bx
Bot Pvt Bx
R Bot Bx
R EOP
R EOSh
R Slp Lim
grd pt
L Slp Lim
-45
-22
-12
-12
0
12
12
22
38
0
-45
89 RHProd
101.427
-4564.2
102.427 -2253.39
100.927 -1211.12
101.17
-1214
100.927
0
102.427 1229.12
101.427 1217.12
94.5
2079
92
3496
89
0
-11.52 SumLH
SumRH
Area= abs(.5*Diff in Sums)
Sta
18+00
-1221.47
604.9733
FILL AREA
Profile Grade
90
92
89
Proposed Surface
Point
Offset
L sideslp
L EOSh.
L EOP
L Bot Bx
Bot Pvt Bx
R Bot Bx
R EOP
R EOSh
R sideslp
-42
-22
-12
-12
0
12
12
22
42
Elev
91.6201
101.62
102.62
101.12
101.36
101.12
102.62
101.62
91.6201
102.86
L Slp Lim
L EOSh.
L EOP
L Bot Bx
Bot Pvt Bx
R Bot Bx
R EOP
R EOSh
R Slp Lim
grd pt
L Slp Lim
-48
-22
-12
-12
0
12
12
22
49
0
-48
89.5 RHProd
eyeball ext
101.427 -4868.48
102.427 -2253.39
100.927 -1211.12
101.17
-1214
100.927
0
102.427 1229.12
101.427 1217.12
88.8
1953.6 eyeball ext
92
4508
89.5
0
817.17 SumLH
SumRH
Area= abs(.5*Diff in Sums)
Sta
EP 20+49.33
-639.147
728.16
FILL AREA
Profile Grade
Elev
-42
-22
-12
-12
0
12
12
22
42
106.76
96.76
97.76
96.26
96.50
96.26
97.76
96.76
106.76
20 ft horiz, +10 ft
vert
lt eop-0.1*10
lt bot bo+1.5
bot box-.02*12
prof grade-1.5
bot box-.02*12
rt bot box+1.5
rt eop-.0.1*10
20' horiz, +10' vert
L Slp Lim
L EOSh.
L EOP
L Bot Bx
Bot Pvt Bx
R Bot Bx
R EOP
R EOSh
R Slp Lim
grd pt
L Slp Lim
-29
-22
-12
-12
0
12
12
22
31
0
-29
99.2 RHProd
96.76 -2806.04
97.76 -2150.72
96.26 -1155.12
96.50
-1158
96.26
0
97.76
1173.12
96.76
1161.12
100.1
2202.2
98
3038
99.2
0
98.00
104.76 SumLH
SumRH
Area= abs(.5*Diff in Sums)
304.56
99.9
CUT AREA
HW4
Sta 12
Sta 14
Sta 16
Trans C to F
Est. 14+20
AC10
AC12
AC14
AF16
Sta 18
EP Sta
Trans F to C
Est 20+00
AF18
AC EP
1800
trans
EP
2000
2696.3
90.43833
99
Project
4933.33
728
2049.33
0
Totals
Excess
4586.735
9642.96
CUT
VOL
FILL VOL
5056.228 FILL