Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Polster Chappell established a long and solid record pattern & policy of EXTORTION and
FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT
2. Chappell fraudulently concealed that as a matter of strictest law, no “lawmaker” could have
possibly made any “law” or “resolution” for the illegal purpose of confiscating Plaintiffs’
private Property of record, “Lot 15A Cayo Costa”, PB 3 PG 25 (1912). Here, Chappell acted
like a CORRUPT bungling Government idiot and deliberately defrauded and deprived the
Plaintiffs of their rights to own and exclude Governments. Since 2007 in exchange for
Defendants’ bribes, Chappell retaliated against the Plaintiffs with, e.g., punishments,
sanctions, and threats, and agreed to extort, e.g., fees and property from the Plaintiff
defraud, deliberately deprive, bribe Officials, and extort property from the Plaintiffs under
2
color of, e.g., authority, office, and official right. Here, Defendants intimidated, punished,
and threatened the Plaintiffs with facially frivolous and deceptive sanctions on the public
record [see Defendants’ idiotic false pretenses of, e.g., ”frivolity”, “vexatiousness”, …],
because the Plaintiffs rightfully defended against said conclusively proven EXTORTION,
CORRUPTION, and FRAUD under color of prima facie fraud scheme “O.R. 569/875”.
5. Here under color of prima facie fake “law” and/or fictitious “resolution 569/875”,
Government Officials deliberately deprived and defrauded the Plaintiffs. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983,
record landowners of their title to private property. Here, the purported “public land
claim”, Doc. # 213, was the facially idiotic fabrication of multiple Defendant Judges in
the U.S. Courts who agreed with other Defendants to accept bribes, defraud, and
7. Here, Defendants fraudulently interfered with public officials and bribed Defendant Judges.
Here, Judges unlawfully demanded real property under color of illegal scam “O.R. 569/875”
and non-existent authority to punish and sanction the Plaintiffs for rightfully defending their
and EXTORTION.
lands under facially fraudulent pretenses of, e.g., “O.R. 569/875”, “record Lee County
3
ownership”, “frivolity”, and “vexatiousness”, even though Defendants and Government
Officials knew that no property or money was legally due, or could have possibly been
9. Expressly, the Defendants stated and again reiterate their absolute objection to and refusal of
10. Under pretense of duty, Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson had forged “land parcels” “12-44-
11. Here, requesting “fees” in excess of those allowed, through wrongful use of fear, force,
and/or authority of office, threatening arrest, all with CORRUPT motives, and unlawfully
demanding money and property were CRIMES on the public record. Agreeing to obtain
Court proceedings were illegal acts for criminal purposes of defrauding and depriving the
Plaintiffs of their right to own their riparian Gulf-front lands and exclude Governments.
12. Here, Government Officials retaliated because Plaintiffs demanded their rights to own and
exclude Governments.
4
HONEYWELL’S EMBARASSINGLY IDIOTIC “PUBLIC LAND” “CLAIM”,
13. Here Honeywell knew that the law did not recognize Honeywell’s facially “criminal fable”
of a “public land” “claim” of Lot 15A. See Ch. 95, Fla. Stat., ADVERSE POSSESSION;
Chapters 73, 74, EMINENT DOMAIN, Fla. Stat.; Ch. 712, Fla. Stat., Florida’s self-enforcing
14. Here, Honeywell “rambled” “incomprehensibly” and idiotically about a “public land”
15. Even if there had ever been [merely hypothetically] a valid Government “claim”, title could
have never involuntarily transferred to Government in the well-proven record absence of any
judicial proceedings. Any and all involuntary title transfers would have been strictly and
exclusively a judicial function. See also Florida Attorney General Opinion, AGO 78-125.
Here, Honeywell acted criminally and just like a clueless idiot, who perverted the
against said Governmental insanity and crimes in U.S. Courts. Here, record idiots like
Defendant Honeywell were objectively partial and incapable of “comprehending” the legal
issues, complaints, and claims for relief presented and mostly un-filed by the Courts.
“lawmaker(s)” of unknown and uncertain non-existent “raid lands”. See different versions of
5
HONEYWELL’S ILLEGAL REPETITION OF JUDICIAL TRASH
17. Just because other Judges had concocted said judicial trash of a “law” and/or facially non-
existent “resolution 569/875”, Honeywell had no authority to repeat the same judicial trash
over and over again under illegal pretenses of “frivolity” and “vexatiousness” and under color
of law, authority, and/or office. Here, Honeywell obstructed de novo review & justice.
18. Unintelligently and corruptly, Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell fraudulently pretended
that Plaintiffs’ real property of record, Lot 15A, as legally described in reference to the 1912
“Cayo Costa” Subdivision Plat of Survey in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 “was claimed
Lot 15A, among other property, was claimed as public land (“Resolution 569/875")
(Dkt 5, Ex. 3, p. 9).”
19. Here, Honeywell’s facially idiotic and fraudulent pretenses of “public land”, Doc. 213, had
no legal and factual basis, but were for the prima facie criminal purposes of obstructing
justice and deliberately depriving the Plaintiff record owners of said Lot 15A, subject Parcel
contradicted the public record of Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable ownership of said Lot 15A as
also affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. See Prescott, et al., v. State of
Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009): Here, Honeywell
fraudulently concealed the dispositive public record evidence that the Plaintiffs were the
unimpeachable “owners of Lot 15A in the Cayo Costa subdivision in Lee County, Florida”:
“I. BACKGROUND
A. Current Action
6
The Appellants are owners of Lot 15A in the Cayo Costa subdivision in
Lee County, Florida. On May 5, 2008, the Appellants filed the present pro se
complaint against numerous state and county officials n1 alleging that they had
violated the Appellants' constitutional rights with respect to their Cayo Costa
property. Most of the allegations in the complaint concern the 1969 Lee
County Resolution 569/875, which claimed the undesignated areas on the east
and west side of the Cayo Costa subdivision plat and all accretions thereto as
public land to be used for public purposes. The Appellants' Lot 15A is on the
west side of the Cayo Costa subdivision on the Gulf of Mexico and is
adjacent to land that was claimed through Resolution 569/875 to create
the Cayo Costa State Park.”
20. Defendant judicial Crook Honeywell affirmed, Doc. # 213, p. 5, that the Plaintiff record
judicial proceeding”, because the Plaintiffs were the record owners of “Lot 15A”. See public
21. Here, the Plaintiffs “appeared for” said “proceeding”, because they were the affirmed record
owners of Lot 15A and entitled to appear. Therefore here, crooked Judge Honeywell knew
that the Plaintiffs held unimpeachable marketable record title to said Lot 15A. Here,
Honeywell’s fraudulent pretenses and deprivations were deliberate and premeditated, Doc. #
213, p. 5:
7
PUBLIC TAX RECORDS EVIDENCED HONEYWELL’S RECORD FRAUD SCHEME
22. In particular, Honeywell knew that the Plaintiff unimpeachable record property owners had
paid real property taxes for said subject Parcel. See attached public records of Lee County
a. The Plaintiffs were the unimpeachable record owners of said “Lot 15A”;
property owners and record property tax payers of their riparian Gulf-front Lot
15A.
8
NOTICE OF APPEAL & EMERGENCY DEMAND FOR RELIEF FROM FRAUD
24. Here, the Plaintiffs appealed from Defendant crooked U.S. District Judge Honeywell’s
“order”, Doc. # 210, “filed 06/22/10”. Here, said judicial Defendant evaded and obstructed
related and/or associated Case 2:2010-cv-00390 on the very same day, 06/22/2010. See
publication:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33659698/PUBLISHED-NOTICE-OF-APPEAL-FROM-
ORDER-Doc-210
25. Here, Honeywell’s fraud, fraud on the Court, and corrupt & criminal acts were an
EMERGENCY. Here, the prima facie criminality, idiocy and irrationality of Honeywell’s
26. While Defendant Honeywell fraudulently pretended Lot 15A to be “public land”, Defendant
Polster Chappell affirmed Plaintiffs’ record ownership just like said U.S. Appellate Court.
See Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr.
21, 2009). Here, bungling Judges fatally conflicted with each other on the record at
27. Here, Honeywell knew that her co-conspirator and fellow judicial Defendant Sheri Polster
Chappell had fraudulently made an order for the illegal Governmental seizure of said “Lot
15A”. See fraudulent “writ of execution”; fraudulent “lien”; fraudulent Doc. ## 432, 432-3:
9
DEMAND FOR RELIEF FROM DEF. CORRUPT JUDGE HONEYWELL’S CRIMES
ON THE PUBLIC RECORD, E.G., DOC. ## 210, 213, UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 60
10
11
EMERGENCY DEMAND TO ENJOIN PERVERSION OF PUBLIC RECORD
28. The Plaintiff record owners of said riparian Gulf-front Lot 15A, PB 3, PG 25 (1912), who
paid real property taxes, demand EMERGENCY relief from Honeywell’s material
misrepresentation and fraudulent concealment of the truth and public record evidence of
Plaintiffs’ record title and ownership of said Lot 15A, STRAP # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A;
see also Appeal # 08-13170, BUSSE, et al., v. LEE COUNTY, et al., Appellate Brief by
29. Here, ‘public records confirmed’ that the Plaintiffs paid property taxes and unimpeachably
owned said riparian Lot 15A as platted and subdivided in 1912, PB 3, PG 25. Here, public
records confirmed that Honeywell was a crooked U.S. Official and liar of record.
30. Here, on Plaintiffs’ Motion and just terms of record, the Court shall relieve the
Plaintiffs from the fraudulent judgment, orders, and proceedings of record such as, e.g.,
12
HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO FALSELY PRETEND RIPENESS REQUIREMENTS
31. Idiotically and corruptly, Honeywell fraudulently pretended “ripeness requirements” for,
e.g., claims of record 4th, 1st, 14th, and 7th U.S. Const. Amendment violations, fraud, and
CORRUPTION. See Doc. # 213. Here, Plaintiffs could directly assert, and rightfully
asserted, their claims for relief from, e.g., Government CORRUPTION and fraud in
Federal Court. Honeywell knew that no ripeness requirements had ever existed.
32. Here, the Plaintiffs rightfully defended against Honeywell’s NAZI-style terror and
upon the Court and legally “incomprehensible” bogus contentions of “frivolity” and “public
land”. Here, Honeywell concealed that no condemnation had ever occurred nor could have
possibly occurred. Had there [hypothetically] been any condemnation, title would have
involuntarily transferred to Lee County, which Honeywell knew never happened. Only then
could there have possibly been any “compensation”, because here Plaintiffs rightfully
13
33. Here, the Plaintiffs had rightfully pleaded, e.g., fraud and fraudulent concealment in both
34. Here, Honeywell fraudulently concealed that Plaintiffs paid property taxes and held perfected
marketable title to said “Lot 15A”. Here, Honeywell’s “order”, Doc. # 213, constituted prima
facie premeditated & deliberate deprivations under color of office and authority. Here,
Honeywell had no authority to pervert the public record & obstruct justice. Prescott v. State
of Florida, supra. Here, Honeywell knew that the Lee County Attorney had categorically
ruled out any possibility of Lee County ownership of Lot 15A, 12/29/2000 Memorandum:
14
15
HONEYWELL’S COVER-UP FOR FELLOW JUDICIAL GANG MEMBERS
35. Here like a brainless parrot, Honeywell merely repeated the null and void orders by the
named judicial Defendants. Because the Plaintiffs had demanded relief from said null and
void orders by judicial Defendants such as, e.g., Steele, Polster Chappell, Pizzo, Lazzara,
which were based on facially fraudulent and legally impossible “Government ownership”
“claims”, Honeywell was obligated to review de novo and use a brain. However here, she
never reviewed anything, but repeated the same old judicial record trash and continued to
pervert the public record just like said fellow judicial Defendants had. Here more than one
hundred (100) pages of Plaintiffs’ Complaint had never even been filed, Doc. # 1:
could have possibly alienated Plaintiffs’ record property against their will;
embarrassingly idiotic Governmental and judicial hoax of a “public land claim” [see, e.g.,
perverting the record & concealing Plaintiffs’ record ownership of Lot 15A, PB 3, PG 25.
16
5. An EMERGENCY order relieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent judgment, orders, and
proceedings of record such as, e.g., Doc. ## 210, 212, 213, 214. for said well-proven reasons;
6. An EMERGENCY order relieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent concealment of their
State action, 2006-CA-003185, Lee County Circuit Court, BUSSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA;
7. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs’ record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel # 12-44-20-01-
8. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel
9. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not maliciously pervert the dispositive affirmation of Plaintiffs’ record ownership by the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed.
10. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not capriciously conceal Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel
# 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, which the Defendants Lee County had asserted before the 11th
11. An Order compelling Defendant Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why her “rulings” were not
NULL AND VOID and procured through the criminal scheme of false “frivolity” and
“vexatiousness” pretenses and the concealment of said fake “legal descriptions”, fake “land”
17
12. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell, because she
disrespected the law, disrupted the proceedings in favor of the Defendants, perverted the
facts of record, and could not possibly be trusted to be impartial and fair, 28 U.S.C. § 455;
18
Def. Crooked Judge Chappell’s Real Estate Fraud:
19
20
21
19
20
Crooked Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell
http://www.scribd.com/Judicial%20Fraud