Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
19
2
15.8
0.522
8.34
1.35
10.4
0.652
4.6 3.07
1.08 0.85
6.3
0.870
2.25 1.77
0.80 0.65
The inclination of the critical state line is significantly steeper than the MC-failure line to prevent the
overprediction of horizontal deformation. One gets
this inclination by choosing a -value, which yields
to !
. The overprediction of horizontal
displacements is well known in the framework of the
classical critical state mechanics. Moreover the value
for
is chosen to uncouple the elastic strain.
This is done to reduce the magnitude of the horizontal displacements as well.
The high -values (Tab. 2) indicate that creep
will not be so important because about half of the
BBC layer has an -value of at least two, decreasing at the bottom of the layer to a value near one. For
that type of soil the amount of creep will be small in
comparison to the rest of the settlements.
Figs. 4 to 6 show the calculation results and the
measurements. The solid lines indicate the measurements, the dashed lines are the results from the SSCmodel and the dotted lines are the analysis with the
SS-model. In Fig. 4 one can recognize that consolidation is not over after the measurement period of
days, because the settlement curves still have an inclination. That fact is supported by Fig. 5, one can see
that in the center of the BBC there is still a pore-waterpressure of around after days. The
SSC-model slightly overestimates in the most cases
the vertical displacements. Moreover the calculated
pore-water-pressures are slightly higher then those
measured. The horizontal displacements are overestimated as well. In most cases the SS-model matches
the measurements better, especially for the deep settlements. So it seems that if there are high values in the soft soils the SSC-model is not so useful.
7.1
1.304
1.44
0.60
E3
17.7
1.5
7.8
1.957
1.25 1.21 1.18
0.57 0.57 0.56
F1
F2
F3
5.9
1.522
1.16 1.14 1.11
0.56 0.56 0.55
10
620 Days
0
Elevation [m]
-10
Sand
A
B
C
-20
D
E
-30
F
-40
Till
0,0
0,1
0,0
0,1
0,0
0,1
DATA
SSC
SS
10
2000 Days
0
-10
Elevation [m]
Sand
A
B
C
-20
D
E
-30
F
-40
Till
0,0
0,1
0,0
0,1
0,0
0,1
layer
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
16.1
0.106
0.091
0.083
14.1
2
1.2
0.076
1.0
0.069
As shown in Tab. 3 the soft clay is almost normally consolidated ( ). Only the upper
have a high value caused by a crust. Hence, a
large amount of creep is to be expected. Furthermore
it demonstrates that the settlements as well as the
pore-pressures and the horizontal displacements were
strongly underestimated by the SS-model whereas the
results from the SSC-model and the measured data
agree fairly well.
4 CONCLUSIONS
After a brief introduction of the SS-model and the
SSC-model two test embankments were used for
back-analysis. The results show that for overconsolidated soils the SSC-model has no advantages compared to the SS-model, because in such case creep
doesnt play an important role. However in normally
consolidated soft clays like in Ska Edeby creep becomes significant and the SSC-model exceeds the SSmodel. This should be kept in mind when simulating
the construction of any building on soft soils.
DATA
SSC
SS
Time [years]
0,0
5,0
10,0
15,0
20,0
-0,1
-0,3
Settlements [m]
-0,5
-0,7
REFERENCES
-0,9
Adachi, T. and F. Oka (1982). Constitutive equation for normally consolidated clays based on elasto-viscoplasticity.
Soils and Foundations 22, 5770.
-0,02
0,0
0,02
0,06
0,10
Bjerrum, L. (1967). 7th rankine lecture: Engineering geology of norwegian normally-consolidated marine clays as
related to settlements of buildings. G e otechnique 17(1),
81118.
A
B
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
Burland, J. B. (1965). The yielding and dilation of clay (correspondence). Geotechnique 15(2), 211214.
-12
-14
Elevation [m]
Figure 7. Time-Settlement-Curve; Pore-pressure distribution after 10 years and horizontal displacements after 20 years