Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
S\2013-1556
In the ideal 21st century classroom, kids are actually excited about going to school, and there are
little or no discipline problems because everyone is eager to learn. In this type of classroom
activities and lessons are related to the community, whether local or global. Students collaborate
with people from different schools and different countries to learn about issues that affect us all,
as well as how we can solve them today and in the future.
The curriculum in the classroom is designed to incorporate many skills and intelligence levels,
and makes use of technology and multimedia. The lessons are not based on textbooks, instead
they are project based. Skills and content are learned through their research and projects, and
textbooks are provided as one of many possible resources.
A new addition to 21st century curriculum is the study of green education and environmental
issues. Kids are taught awareness of their world and real experts such as scientist and politicians
are brought in to answer student's questions.
New schools in the 21st century will be bright and spacious, and kids will have room for group
projects and individual assignments. Walls will be hung with student work, and there will be
places for students to put on performances for their parents and members of the community.
Students have full access to technology and, if possible, every student will have a laptop.
Within the school there will be labs and learning centers, as well as studios for art, music,
theatre, and so on. Each classroom will be equipped with a television so that all students can
watch school productions and other school presentations.
While it may take some time before schools and teachers are equipped to properly educate in the
21st century once they are the results will be dramatic. Children will be engaged and eager to
learn. In fact, they will carry on learning at home and over holidays, and they will have the
resources they need to keep learning no matter where they are. This ability to foster a love of
learning is truly the role of education in the 21st century.
Consider the following as three compelling realities that highlight the need to embrace changes:
Our current education system is based on an outdated industrial model;
Their teacher needs to evolve. Has been a Transformation in how students learn;
Technology provides access to a number of authorities on different subjects bringing into
question the role of textbooks and how the role of teachers needs to evolve.
First at the new challenges characterizing the environment in which higher education institutions
operate and compete at the beginning of the 21st century. Second, it examines some concrete
implications of these challenges in terms of changing institutional forms and new ways of
delivering higher education programs, looking at promising trends and experiences in countries
and institutions which have taken the lead in introducing reforms and innovations.
The New Challenges:
There are three major, intertwined new challenges which bear heavily on the role and functions
of higher education:
1) Economic globalization,
2) The increasing importance of knowledge as a driver of growth, and
3) The information and communication revolution.
Globalization:
Globalization is the complex integration of capital, technology, and information across national
boundaries in such a way as to create an increasingly integrated world market, with the direct
consequence that more and more countries and firms have no choice but to compete in a global
economy. Globalization may not be a new phenomenon. The conquest of America by the Spanish
and Portuguese invaders at the end of the 15th century, the triangular cotton and slave trade in
the 17th and 18th centuries, the construction of the trans-Atlantic telegraph cable in the 1860s,
and the colonization of most of Asia and Africa until the middle of the 20th century were key
factors of economic integration and determinants of economic growth on a global scale. But
there has undoubtedly been an acceleration of the phenomenon in the past two decades as
demonstrated by the increase in international trade and the growing interdependence of capital
markets.
Emphasizing globalization as an important economic trend does not imply a value judgment,
either positive or negative. Many people see this evolution as a major source of opportunities,
while critics decry the dangers of inter-dependency and high volatility, such as the risk of
transferring financial crises from one country to the other. But globalization is happening,
whether one approves of it or not, whether one likes it or not, and every country in the world,
every firm, every working person is affected by it and is very likely a part of it.
dominated the market for more than three years in the late 1980s. Ten years later its competitive
edge lasted only three months with Pentium II. Even more dramatic,
Pentium III was supplanted by AMDs Athlon microprocessor after being on the market for only
a few weeks.
In addition, in many fields the distance between basic science and technological application is
narrowing or, in some cases, disappearing altogether. The implication is that pure and applied
research are not separate any longer. Molecular biology and computer science are two salient
examples of this evolution.
The results of a recent survey of technical innovation manufacturing firms underscore the
strategic importance of academic research in the development of new industrial products and
processes. On average, 19 percent of new products and 15 percent of new processes were
directly based on academic research. The proportion was even higher, 44 and 37 percent
respectively, in high technology industries such as pharmaceuticals, instruments and information
processing. There is also a significant geographical dimension to this relation between academic
research and industrial applications. This is underlined by a rich body of evidence on the impact
of universities on regional development and the spillover effects of academic research on
industrial research and technology and local innovation.
mature students, stay-at-home students, traveling students, part-time students, day students, night
students, weekend students, etc. One can expect a significant change in the demographic shape
of higher education institutions, whereby the traditional structure of a pyramid with a majority of
first degree students, a smaller group of post-graduate students, and finally an even smaller share
of participants in continuing education programs will be replaced by an inverted pyramid with a
minority of first time students, more students pursuing a second or third degree, and the majority
of students enrolled in short term continuing education activities.
School program recognizes the 21st Century Fluencies that our global economy requires
Student voice should acknowledged and student needs drive the program
School should supported appropriately by all members of the community
School facility should be well designed and maintained
To create a model of students that would be able to enter the workforce with the same skills.
Although in other primary areas of society such as health care, transportation, and
communication there has been dramatic changes since 1900, education systems remain
essentially unchanged. Often the best rational we can offer for current practice is weve always
done it this way. Consider the 10-month school calendar. It is based on a time when young
people were needed in the summer to help harvest crops. Despite the fact that that agricultural
model is only needed in some rural pockets of our society, we continue, year after year, with the
10-month school calendar.
There is a need for schools to remain in sync with the world around them and the learners within
them. Students need to be involved in real, relevant experiences that recognize how they learn.
Digital Age students are profoundly different than those who graduated only 10 to 15 years ago.
They have developed what is called a cultural brain one defined by the ability to process
massive amounts of, primarily, visual and textual information at rapid speed due to their
constant exposure to the digital bombardment that is their everyday experience. Student brains
are different than those of their teachers, administrators, parents and employers most of whom
graduated before the digital age. To harness their current gifts gifts deemed necessary to
compete in the global economy we must change how we educate on every level. We cannot
carry on preparing students for the farms and factories of yesterday while the world jumps to
light speed with biotechnology, nanotechnology, neuro-technology, global high speed wired and
wireless networks, and incredibly powerful personal portable devices. Schools must prepare kids
for the world of tomorrow the world where they will spend the rest of their lives
Teachers play a fundamental role however, it is no longer how much the teacher
knows, but how well the teacher can be both a learner and a catalyst for others to
be curious and full of discovery
The teacher will take on the stances of:
Instructing This is where explicit teaching is required. The teacher is focusing on curriculum
content, knowledge and skills.
Collaborating Facilitating students working together, face to face or over distances,
recognizing the norms of collaboration among various cultures, engaging in collaborative
inquiry, on projects that have meaning for the learner.
Coaching The teacher is supporting the student as the driver of his or her learning. This
includes goal setting, problem-solving, practice and self-directed learning.
Monitoring This is the ongoing formative assessment that the teacher engages in in order to
determine what the student needs and thus whether there is a need to alter his or her stance.
Based upon established success criteria, students engage in peer assessment and frequent
feedback from the teacher. Teachers ensure high expectations for all and create conditions that
ensure time on task.
The Guiding Principles articulate ideals of teaching, learning, assessing, and administering
science and technology programs.
The Strands
The learning standards are grouped into four strands:
Earth and Space Science
Life Science (Biology)
Physical Sciences (Chemistry and Physics)
Technology/Engineering
Each strand section begins with an overview of the strand.
The 2006 revised high school learning standards listed in this Framework articulate the expectations for
the following introductory courses:
Appendices
The following appendices provide curricular resources to support instruction at all grade levels:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Pre K through High School Learning Standards Organized by Strand and Broad Topics
Additional Learning Activities for Grade Pre K through Grade 8
Historical and Social Context for Science and Technology/Engineering Topics for Study
Safety Practices and Legal Requirements
Dissection and Dissection Alternatives in Science Courses: Policies and Resources for
Public Schools
6. Curriculum Review Resources
7. Criteria for Evaluating Instructional Materials and Programs in Science and
Technology/Engineering
Science may be described as the attempt to give good accounts of the patterns in nature. The
result of scientific investigation is an understanding of natural processes. Scientific explanations
are always subject to change in the face of new evidence. Ideas with the most durable
explanatory power become established theories or are codified as laws of nature. Overall, the key
criterion of science is that it provide a clear, rational, and succinct account of a pattern in nature.
This account must be based on data gathering and analysis and other evidence obtained through
direct observations or experiments, reflect inferences that are broadly shared and communicated,
and be accompanied by a model that offers a naturalistic explanation expressed in conceptual,
mathematical, and/or mechanical terms. Here are some everyday examples of patterns seen in
nature:
The sun appears to move each day from the eastern horizon to the western horizon.
Virtually all objects released near the surface of the earth sooner or later fall to the ground.
Parents and their offspring are similar, e.g., lobsters produce lobsters, not cats.
Green is the predominant color of most plants.
Some objects float while others sink.
Fire yields heat.
Weather in North Pakistan generally moves from west to east.
Many organisms that once inhabited the earth no longer do so.
It is beyond the scope of this document to examine the scientific accounts of these patterns.
Some are well known, such as that the rotation of the earth on its axis gives rise to the apparent
travel of the sun across the sky, or that fire is a transfer of energy from one form to another.
Others, like buoyancy or the cause of extinction, require subtle and sometimes complex
accounts. These patterns, and many others, are the puzzles that scientists attempt to explain.
the internal combustion engine, power transformers, nuclear power, and human gene therapy.
The boundaries between science and technology blur together to extend knowledge.
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Engaging students in inquiry-based instruction is one way of developing conceptual
understanding, content knowledge, and scientific skills. Scientific inquiry as a means to
understand the natural and human-made worlds requires the application of content knowledge
through the use of scientific skills. Students should have curricular opportunities to learn about
and understand science and technology through participatory activities, particularly laboratory,
fieldwork, and design challenges.
Inquiry, experimentation, and design should not be taught or tested as separate, stand-alone skills.
Rather, opportunities for inquiry, experimentation, and design should arise within a well-planned
curriculum. Instruction and assessment should include examples drawn from life science, physical
science, earth and space science, and technology standards. Doing so will make clear to students
that what is known does not stand separate from how it is known.
In grades 35, students can plan and carry out investigations as a class, in small groups,
or independently, often over a period of several class lessons. The teacher should first
model the process of selecting a question that can be answered, formulating a hypothesis,
planning the steps of an experiment, and determining the most objective way to test the
hypothesis. Students should incorporate mathematical skills of measuring and graphing to
communicate their findings.
In grades 68, teacher guidance remains important but allows for more variation in
student approach. Students at this level are ready to formalize their understanding of what
an experiment requires by controlling variables to ensure a fair test. Their work becomes
more quantitative, and they learn the importance of carrying out several measurements to
minimize sources of error. Because students at this level use a greater range of tools and
equipment, they must learn safe laboratory practices (see Appendix IV). At the
conclusion of their investigations, students in these grades can be expected to prepare
reports of their questions, procedures, and conclusions.
In high school, students develop greater independence in designing and carrying out
experiments, most often working alone or in small groups. They come up with questions
and hypotheses that build on what they have learned from secondary sources. They learn
to critique and defend their findings, and to revise their explanations of phenomena as
new findings emerge. Their facility with using a variety of physical and conceptual
models increases. Students in the final two years of high school can be encouraged to
carry out extended independent experiments that explore a scientific hypothesis in depth,
sometimes with the assistance of a scientific mentor from outside the school setting.
Preparation for post-secondary opportunities is another reason to provide regular laboratory
and fieldwork experiences in high school science and technology courses. The Board of
Higher Educations states that three science courses, including two courses with laboratory
work, must be completed in order to fulfill the minimum science requirement for admission
to the Commonwealths four-year public institutions. All high school courses based on the
standards presented in this document should include substantial laboratory and/or fieldwork
to allow all students the opportunity to meet or exceed this requirement of Higher Education.
Grades 35
Recognize simple patterns in data and use data to create a reasonable explanation for the
results of an investigation or experiment.
Record data and communicate findings to others using graphs, charts, maps, models, and
oral and written reports.
Grades 68
High School
This Framework introduces four Scientific Inquiry Skills (SIS) standards that are included in
each introductory high school course (except Technology, where they are replaced by the steps of
the Engineering Design Process):
SIS1. Make observations, raise questions, and formulate hypotheses.
SIS2. Design and conduct scientific investigations.
SIS3. Analyze and interpret results of scientific investigations.
SIS4. Communicate and apply the results of scientific investigations.
Conclusion:
Future careers will require higher levels of science education than in the past. That science
education must enable individuals to discover what they need to know rather than just having
static knowledge. Society will need college graduates with mental agility and adaptability.
If this is the goal of education, colleges and universities must reexamine how that goal is
achieved. The Net Generation and the current capabilities of information technology make it
possible to support learning activities that will enable graduates to be mentally agile and
adaptable. However, beyond technical infrastructure, the use of technology in the service of
learning is limited.
The Greater Expectations report calls for a focus on developing intentional learners; it also calls
for developing intentional institutions. Colleges and universities are connecting silos of
administrative work with relational databases so that, for example, financial aid structures can
interface with human resources and accounting, ensuring students can work for the institution
and maintain simultaneous student and staff categorizations. Eight years ago this was not easy,
but today no one thinks it should be any other way. Clearly, science and technology can facilitate
the achievement of the operational goals of the institution. But achieving one of its most
important goalsimproving the learning of all studentsthrough technology will require
conversations at all levelsdepartment, college, institution, and state. With calls for greater
accountability for increased spending and for assessment of student learning, we can ask for no
less than the effective and coherent integration of technology into an enriched curriculum that
meets both student and societal expectations.
References:
http://www.greaterexpectations.org/, pp. 2122
http://www.enc.org/about/partners/donors/0,2134,86356,00.shtm
http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/tl/index.htm
http://aahebulletin.com/public/archive/sevenprinciples1987.asp
http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/CASTL/index.htm