Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
22 June 2007
CONTENTS
Background
Research questions
Method
Result
Discussion
Map of Uttaradit
Bankhok
Fakta
Thapla
Disaster
affected district
Comparison
district
Mueang
Lublae
Tron
Nampard
Thongsankhan
Pichai
3
Research questions
Can the community protect people from
catastrophic health spending?
Method
1. Cross-sectional survey (Quantitative study)
- Household survey
2. Qualitative study
- Focus group discussion
- In-depth interview
Results
Quantitative results
Population characteristics
Characteristics
All household
Resident
Rural
Population
- Sex
- Mean age
220
100%
752
Female
56.8%
36.8 years
10
3.6
16.9
67.3
Primary
Secondary
Vocational
University
11
Occupation of samples
3.5 0.9
24.6
27.4
31.5
None
Farmer
Employee
Commercial
Civil servant
12
Poor
Not poor
13
Not poor
n=128
n
%
CSMBS
6.4
6.3
UC
75
81.5
107
83.5
SSS
4.4
13
10.2
No insurance
7.6
Health
insurance
Poor n=92
14
not poor
Asset
Debt
16
Poor
Not poor
cases
cases
Illness
27
42
Hypertension
12
Diabetes
Heart
17
Poor
Health facilities
n
Illness
Not poor
%
n
42
27
Health centers
27.3
29.2
Private clinics
36.3
11
35.4
Public hospitals
27.3
11
35.4
Drug stores
9.1
18
Poor
Not poor
All households
92
128
Catastrophic
Percent
5.4
1.5
Catastrophic
19
Poor
Not poor
CSMB
20.0
UC
80.0
100
20
Qualitative study
21
Implementation
In-depth interview
patients and relatives 8 persons
Provincial hospital officer 3 persons
Provincial health officer 2 persons
Focus group discussion
15 participants per community in 4
communities
22
25
Issues
Lublae
- Facility
Health center
- Distance
1 Km
Satisfaction
- Social welfare
-Elderly, 5 persons
-Handicap, all
-HIV,AIDS Patients
26
Issues
Lublae
More in public
-Participation in health
- DHF campaign
- Exercise club
- Avian Flu. Campaign
- Elderly club
- Local government support
subsidy for health service
- Plan to fund the deprived 27
Labor cases
and
Operation cases
28
Conclusion
29
30