Sie sind auf Seite 1von 10

Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in

Article Talk

Read Edit View history

Search Wikipedia

Psychosynthesis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Dansk
Deutsch
Franais
Italiano
Nederlands
Norsk bokml
Polski
Portugus
Romn

Suomi
Svenska
Edit links

Psychosynthesis is an approach to psychology that was developed by Italian psychiatrist, Roberto Assagioli. He
compared psychosynthesis to the prevailing thinking of the day, contrasting psychosynthesis for example with
existential psychology, but unlike the latter considered loneliness not to be "either ultimate or essential".[1] Assagioli
asserted that "the direct experience of the self, of pure self-awareness... is true."[1] Spiritual goals of "self-realization"
and the "interindividual psychosynthesis" of 'social integration...the harmonious integration of the individual into ever
larger groups up to the "one humanity"'[2] were central to Assagioli's theory.[1] Psychosynthesis was not intended to
be a school of thought or an exclusive method[3] but many conferences and publications had it as a central theme and
centres were formed in Italy and the United States in the 1960s.
Psychosynthesis departed from the empirical foundations of psychology in that it studied a person as a personality and
a soul[4] but Assagioli continued to insist that it was scientific. He developed therapeutic methods beyond those found in
psychoanalysis. Although the unconscious is an important part of his theory, Assagioli was careful to maintain a
balance with rational, conscious therapeutical work.
Assagioli was not the first to use the term "psychosynthesis". The earliest was by James Jackson Putnam, who used it
as the name of his electroconvulsive therapy. The term was also used by C. G. Jung and A. R. Orage, who were both
far closer to Assagioli's thinking than Putnam. C. G. Jung had written, comparing his goals to those of Sigmund Freud,
"If there is a 'psychoanalysis' there must also be a 'psychosynthesis which creates future events according to the same
laws'."[5] A. R. Orage, who was publisher of the influential The New Age journal, also made use of the term, which he
hyphenated as psycho-synthesis. Orage formed an early psychology study group (which included Maurice Nicoll who
later studied with Carl Jung) and concluded that what humanity needed was not psychoanalysis, but psychosynthesis.[6] The term was also employed by Bezzoli.[7] Freud, however, was opposed to what he saw as the directive
element in Jung's approach to psychosynthesis,[8] and argued for a spontaneous synthesis on the patient's part: "As
we analyse...the great unity which we call his ego fits into itself all the instinctual impulses which before had been split
off and held apart from it. The psycho-synthesis is thus achieved in analytic treatment without our intervention,
automatically and inevitably."[9]
Contents
1 Origins
2 Aims
3 Model of the person
3.1 Lower unconscious
3.2 Middle unconscious
3.3 Higher unconscious
3.4 Subpersonalities
3.5 "I"
3.6 Self
4 Stages
5 Methods
6 Criticism
7 Fictional analogies
8 Notes
9 References
10 Bibliography
11 External links

Origins

[ edit ]

In 1909, C.G. Jung wrote to Sigmund Freud of "a very pleasant and perhaps valuable acquaintance, our first Italian, a
Dr. Assagioli from the psychiatric clinic in Florence".[10] Later however, this same Roberto Assagioli (18881974) wrote
a doctoral dissertation, "La Psicosintesi," in which he began to move away from Freud's psychoanalysis towards what
he called psychosynthesis:

converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com

A beginning of my conception of psychosynthesis was contained in my doctoral thesis on Psychoanalysis


(1910), in which I pointed out what I considered to be some of the limitations of Freud's views.[11]
In developing psychosynthesis, Assagioli agreed with Freud that healing childhood trauma and developing a healthy
ego were necessary aims of psychotherapy, but held that human growth could not be limited to this alone. A student of
philosophical and spiritual traditions of both East and West, Assagioli sought to address human growth as it proceeded
beyond the norm of the well-functioning ego; he wished also to support the blossoming of human potential into what
Abraham Maslow[12] later termed self-actualization, and further still, into the spiritual or transpersonal dimensions of
human experience as well.
Assagioli envisioned an approach to the human being which could address both the process of personal growthof
personality integration and self-actualizationas well as transpersonal developmentthat dimension glimpsed for
example in peak experiences (Maslow) of inspired creativity, spiritual insight, and unitive states of consciousness. In
addition, psychosynthesis recognizes the process of Self-realization, of contact and response with one's deepest
callings and directions in life, which can involve either or both personal and transpersonal development.
Psychosynthesis is therefore one of the earliest forerunners of both humanistic psychology and transpersonal
psychology, even preceding Jung's break with Freud by several years. Assagioli's conception has an affinity with
existential-humanistic psychology and other approaches which attempt to understand the nature of the healthy
personality, personal responsibility and choice, and the actualization of the personal self; similarly, his conception is
related to the field of transpersonal psychology, with its focus on higher states of consciousness, spirituality, and
human experiencing beyond the individual self. Accordingly, Assagioli served on the board of editors for both the
Journal of Humanistic Psychology and the Journal of Transpersonal Psychology.
Assagioli presents the two major theoretical models in his seminal book, Psychosynthesis,[13] models that have
remained fundamental to psychosynthesis theory and practice through the years. These two models are 1) a diagram
and description of the human person, and the other 2) a stage theory of the process of psychosynthesis (see below).

Aims

[ edit ]

In Psychosomatic Medicine and Bio-psychosynthesis, Assagioli states that the principal aims and tasks of
psychosynthesis are:
1. the elimination of the conflicts and obstacles, conscious and unconscious, that block [the complete and
harmonious development of the human personality]
2. the use of active techniques to stimulate the psychic functions still weak and immature.[14]
In his major book, Psychosynthesis: A Collection of Basic Writings (1965), Assagioli writes of three aims of
psychosynthesis:
Let us examine whether and how it is possible to solve this central problem of human life, to heal this
fundamental infirmity of man. Let us see how he may free himself from this enslavement and achieve an
harmonious inner integration, true Self-realization, and right relationships with others. (p. 21)

Model of the person

[ edit ]

Lower unconscious [ edit ]

Psychosynthesis Egg Diagram

For Assagioli, 'the lower unconscious, which contains one's


personal psychological past in the form of repressed complexes,
long-forgotten memories and dreams and imaginations',[15] stood
at the base of the diagram of the mind.
The lower unconscious is that realm of the person to which is
relegated the experiences of shame, fear, pain, despair, and rage
associated with primal wounding suffered in life. One way to think
of the lower unconscious is that it is a particular bandwidth of
one's experiential range that has been broken away from
consciousness. It comprises that range of experience related to
the threat of personal annihilation, of destruction of self, of
nonbeing, and more generally, of the painful side of the human
condition. As long as this range of experience remains
unconscious, the person will have a limited ability to be empathic
with self or others in the more painful aspects of human life.

converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com

At the same time, 'the lower unconscious merely represents the


most primitive part of ourselves...It is not bad, it is just earlier '.[16]
Indeed, 'the "lower" side has many attractions and great vitality',
and as with Freud's id, or Jung's shadow the conscious goal
must be to 'achieve a creative tension'[17] with the lower
unconscious.

Middle unconscious [ edit ]


The middle unconscious is a sector of the person whose contents,
although unconscious, nevertheless support normal conscious
functioning in an ongoing way (thus it is illustrated as most
immediate to "I"). It is the capacity to form patterns of skills,
behaviors, feelings, attitudes, and abilities that can function
without conscious attention, thereby forming the infrastructure of
one's conscious life.
The function of the middle unconscious can be seen in all spheres
of human development, from learning to walk and talk, to acquiring
languages, to mastering a trade or profession, to developing
social roles. Anticipating today's neuroscience, Assagioli even
referred to "developing new neuromuscular patterns".[18] All such
elaborate syntheses of thought, feeling, and behavior are built
upon learnings and abilities that must eventually operate
unconsciously.
For Assagioli, 'Human healing and growth that involves work with
either the middle or the lower unconscious is known as personal
psychosynthesis '.[19]

1: Lower Unconscious
2: Middle Unconscious
3: Higher Unconscious
4: Field of Consciousness
5: Conscious Self or "I"
6: Higher Self
7: Collective Unconscious

Higher unconscious [ edit ]


Assagioli termed 'the sphere of aesthetic experience, creative inspiration, and higher states of consciousness...the
higher unconscious '.[20] The higher unconscious (or superconscious) denotes "our higher potentialities which seek to
express themselves, but which we often repel and repress" (Assagioli). As with the lower unconscious, this area is by
definition not available to consciousness, so its existence is inferred from moments in which contents from that level
affect consciousness. Contact with the higher unconscious can be seen in those moments, termed peak experiences
by Maslow, which are often difficult to put into words, experiences in which one senses deeper meaning in life, a
profound serenity and peace, a universality within the particulars of existence, or perhaps a unity between oneself and
the cosmos. This level of the unconscious represents an area of the personality that contains the "heights" overarching
the "depths" of the lower unconscious. As long as this range of experience remains unconscious in what Desoille
termed '"repression of the sublime"'[21] the person will have a limited ability to be empathic with self or other in the
more sublime aspects of human life.
The higher unconscious thus represents 'an autonomous realm, from where we receive our higher intuitions and
inspirations altruistic love and will, humanitarian action, artistic and scientific inspiration, philosophic and spiritual
insight, and the drive towards purpose and meaning in life'.[22] It may be compared to Freud's superego, seen as 'the
higher, moral, supra-personal side of human nature...a higher nature in man',[23] incorporating 'Religion, morality, and
a social sense the chief elements in the higher side of man...putting science and art to one side'.[24]

Subpersonalities [ edit ]
Subpersonalities based in the personal unconscious form a central strand in psychosynthesis thinking. 'One of the first
people to have started really making use of subpersonalities for therapy and personal growth was Roberto Assagioli',
psychosynthesis reckoning that 'subpersonalities exist at various levels of organization, complexity, and refinement'[25]
throughout the mind. A five-fold process of recognition, acceptance, co-ordination, integration, and synthesis 'leads to
the discovery of the Transpersonal Self, and the realization that that is the final truth of the person, not the
subpersonalities'.[26]
Some subpersonalities may be seen 'as psychological contents striving to emulate an archetype...degraded
expressions of the archetypes of higher qualities '.[27] Others will resist the process of integration; will 'take the line that
it is difficult being alive, and it is far easier and safer to stay in an undifferentiated state'.[28]

"I" [ edit ]

converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com

"I" is the direct "reflection" or "projection" of Self (Assagioli) and


the essential being of the person, distinct but not separate from all
contents of experience. "I" possesses the two functions of
consciousness, or awareness, and will, whose field of operation is
represented by the concentric circle around "I" in the oval diagram
Personal Will.

Psychosynthesis Star Diagram

Psychosynthesis suggests that "we can experience the will as


having four stages. The first stage could be described as 'having
no will' ",[29] and might perhaps be linked with the hegemony of the
lower unconscious. "The next stage of the will is understanding
that 'will exists'. We might still feel that we cannot actually do it, but
we know...it is possible".[30] "Once we have developed our will, at
least to some degree, we pass to the next stage which is called
'having a will' ", and thereafter "in psychosynthesis we call the
fourth and final stage of the evolution of the will in the individual
'being will' " which then "relates to the 'I' or self...draws energy
from the transpersonal self".[31]
Psychosynthesis Star Diagram

The "I" is placed at the center of the field of awareness and will in
formulated by Roberto Assagioli
order to indicate that "I" is the one who has consciousness and
will. It is "I" who is aware of the psyche-soma contents as they pass
in and out of awareness; the contents come and go, while "I" may remain present to each experience as it arises. But "I"
is dynamic as well as receptive: "I" has the ability to affect the contents of awareness and can even affect awareness
itself, by choosing to focus awareness (as in many types of meditation), expand it, or contract it.
Since "I" is distinct from any and all contents and structures of experience, "I" can be thought of as not a "self" at all but
as "noself". That is, "I" is never the object of experience. "I" is who can experience, for example, the ego disintegrating
and reforming, who can encounter emptiness and fullness, who can experience utter isolation or cosmic unity, who can
engage any and all arising experiences. "I" is not any particular experience but the experiencer, not object but subject,
and thus cannot be seen or grasped as an object of consciousness. This "noself" view of "I" can be seen in Assagioli's
discussion of "I" as a reflection of Self: "The reflection appears to be self-existent but has, in reality, no autonomous
substantiality. It is, in other words, not a new and different light but a projection of its luminous source".[32] The next
section describes this "luminous source", Self.

Self [ edit ]
Pervading all the areas mapped by the oval diagram, distinct but not separate from all of them, is Self (which has also
been called Higher Self or Transpersonal Self). The concept of Self points towards a source of wisdom and guidance
within the person, a source which can operate quite beyond the control of the conscious personality. Since Self
pervades all levels, an ongoing lived relationship with SelfSelf-realizationmay lead anywhere on the diagram as
one's direction unfolds (this is one reason for not illustrating Self at the top of the diagram, a representation that tends
to give the impression that Self-realization leads only into the higher unconscious). Relating to Self may lead for
example to engagement with addictions and compulsions, to the heights of creative and religious experience, to the
mysteries of unitive experience, to issues of meaning and mortality, to grappling with early childhood wounding, to
discerning a sense of purpose and meaning in life.
The relationship of "I" and Self is paradoxical. Assagioli was clear that "I" and Self were from one point of view, one. He
wrote, "There are not really two selves, two independent and separate entities. The Self is one".[32] Such a nondual
unity is a fundamental aspect of this level of experience. But Assagioli also understood that there could be a
meaningful relationship between the person and Self as well:
Accounts of religious experiences often speak of a "call" from God, or a "pull" from some Higher Power;
this sometimes starts a "dialogue" between the man [or woman] and this "higher Source"...[33]
Assagioli did not of course limit this relationship and dialogue to those dramatic experiences of "call" seen in the lives of
great men and women throughout history. Rather, the potential for a conscious relationship with Self exists for every
person at all times and may be assumed to be implicit in every moment of every day and in every phase of life, even
when one does not recognize this. Whether within one's private inner world of feelings, thoughts, and dreams, or within
one's relationships with other people and the natural world, a meaningful ongoing relationship with Self may be lived.

Stages

[ edit ]

converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com

Writing about the model of the person presented above, Assagioli states that it is a "structural, static, almost
'anatomical' representation of our inner constitution, while it leaves out its dynamic aspect, which is the most important
and essential one".[34] Thus he follows this model immediately with a stage theory outlining the process of
psychosynthesis. This scheme can be called the "stages of psychosynthesis", and is presented here.
It is important to note that although the linear progression of the following stages does make logical sense, these
stages may not in fact be experienced in this sequence; they are not a ladder up which one climbs, but aspects of a
single process. Further, one never outgrows these stages; any stage can be present at any moment throughout the
process of Psychosynthesis, Assaglioli acknowledging 'persisting traits belonging to preceding psychological ages' and
the perennial possibility of 'retrogression to primitive stages'.[35]
The stages of Psychosynthesis may be tabulated as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.

Thorough knowledge of one's personality.


Control of its various elements.
Realization of one's true Selfthe discovery or creation of a unifying center.
Psychosynthesis: the formation or reconstruction of the personality around a new center.[36]

Methods

[ edit ]

Psychosynthesis was regarded by Assagioli as more of an orientation and a general approach to the whole human
being, and as existing apart from any of its particular concrete applications. This approach allows for a wide variety of
techniques and methods to be used within the psychosynthesis context. 'Dialogue, Gestalt techniques, dream work,
guided imagery, affirmations, and meditation are all powerful tools for integration', but 'the attitude and presence of the
guide are of far greater importance than the particular methods used'.[37] Sand tray, art therapy, journaling, drama
therapy, and body work; cognitive-behavioral techniques; object relations, self psychology, and family systems
approaches, may all be used in different contexts, from individual and group psychotherapy, to meditation and self-help
groups. Psychosynthesis offers an overall view which can help orient oneself within the vast array of different modalities
available today, and be applied either for therapy or for self-actualization.
Recently, two psychosynthesis techniques were shown to help student sojourners in their acculturation process. First,
the self-identification exercise eased anxiety, an aspect of culture shock. Secondly, the subpersonality model aided
students in their ability to integrate a new social identity.[38] In another recent study, the subpersonality model was
shown to be an effective intervention for aiding creative expression, helping people connect to different levels of their
unconscious creativity.[39]
One broad classification of the techniques used involves the following headings: ' Analytical: To help identify blocks
and enable the exploration of the unconscious'.[40] Psychosynthesis stresses 'the importance of using obstacles as
steps to growth'[41] 'blessing the obstacle...blocks are our helpers'.[42] ' Mastery...the eight psychological functions
need to be gradually retrained to produce permanent positive change'.[40] ' Transformation...the refashioning of the
personality around a new centre'.[40] ' Grounding...into the concrete terms of daily life.[40] ' Relational...to cultivate
qualities such as love, openness and empathy'.[43]
Psychosynthesis allows practitioners the recognition and validation of an extensive range of human experience: the
vicissitudes of developmental difficulties and early trauma; the struggle with compulsions, addictions, and the trance of
daily life; the confrontation with existential identity, choice, and responsibility; levels of creativity, peak performance,
and spiritual experience; and the search for meaning and direction in life. None of these important spheres of human
existence need be reduced to the other, and each can find its right place in the whole. This means that no matter what
type of experience is engaged, and no matter what phase of growth is negotiated, the complexity and uniqueness of
the person may be respecteda fundamental principle in any application of psychosynthesis.

Criticism

[ edit ]

In the December 1974 issue of Psychology Today, Assagioli was interviewed by Sam Keen and was asked to comment
on the limits of psychosynthesis. He answered paradoxically: "The limit of psychosynthesis is that it has no limits. It is
too extensive, too comprehensive. Its weakness is that it accepts too much. It sees too many sides at the same time
and that is a drawback."[44]
Psychosynthesis "has always been on the fringes of the 'official' therapy world" and it "is only recently that the concepts
and methods of psychoanalysis and group analysis have been introduced into the training and practice of
psychosynthesis psychotherapy".[45]
As a result, the movement has been at times exposed to the dangers of fossilisation and cultism, so that on occasion,
having "started out reflecting the high-minded spiritual philosophy of its founder, [it] became more and more
authoritarian, more and more strident in its conviction that psychosynthesis was the One Truth".[46]

converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com

A more technical danger is that premature concern with the transpersonal may hamper dealing with personal
psychosynthesis: for example, "evoking serenity ... might produce a false sense of well-being and security".[47]
Practitioners have noted how "inability to ... integrate the superconscious contact with everyday experience easily leads
to inflation", and have spoken of "an 'Icarus complex', the tendency whereby spiritual ambition fails to take personality
limitations into account and causes all sorts of psychological difficulties".[48]

Fictional analogies

[ edit ]

Stephen Potter's "Lifemanship Psycho-Synthesis Clinic", where you may "find the psycho-synthesist lying relaxed on
the couch while the patient will be encouraged to walk up and down"[49] would seem a genuine case of "parallel
evolution", since its clear targets, as "the natural antagonists...of the lifeplay, are the psychoanalysts".[50]

Notes
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.

40.
41.
42.
43.
44.

[ edit ]

^a b c

Assagioli, R. (1965). Psychosynthesis, p.5.


^ Assaglioli, R. (1993). Psychosynthesis, p. 7 and p.5
^ A Psychology with a Soul: Psychosynthesis in Evolutionary Context by Jean Hardy, p. 20.
^ A Psychology with a Soul: Psychosynthesis in Evolutionary Context by Jean Hardy, p.21.
^ Jung quoted in J. Kerr, A Dangerous Method (2012) pp. 214-5.
^ A. R. Orage: On Love/Psychological Exercises: With Some Aphorisms & Other Essays, p.126
^ Roberto Assagioli - his life and work A biography from Kentaur Institute in Denmark
^ J. Kerr, A Dangerous Method (2012) p. 489.
^ Sigmund Freud, "Lines of Advance in Psycho-Analytic Therapy" [1918] in Neville Symington, Narcissism: A New Theory
(London 2003) p. 110.
^ McGuire, William, ed. (1974). The Freud/Jung Letters. Vol. XCIV, Bollingen Series. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University
Press. p. 241
^ Assagioli, R. (1965). Psychosynthesis, p.280
^ Maslow, Abraham. (1962). Toward a Psychology of Being. Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.
^ Assagioli, R. (1965). Psychosynthesis. New York: The Viking Press.
^ http://two.not2.org/psychosynthesis/articles/PsychosomaticMedicine.pdf
^ William Stewart, An A-Z of Counselling Theory and Practice (2005) p. 386
^ Pierro Ferrucci, What We May Be: The Vision and Techniques of Psychosynthesis (London 1990) p. 44
^ Ferrucci, p. 204
^ Assagioli, R. (1973). The Act of Will. New York: Penguin Books. p.191
^ John Firman/Ann Gila, Psychosynthesis: a psychology of the spirit (2002) p. 177
^ Firman/Gila, p. 2
^ Ferrucci, p. 156
^ Stewart, p. 386
^ Sigmund Freud, On Metapsychology (P. F. L. 11) p. 375
^ Freud, Metapsychology p. 377
^ John Rowan, Discover Your Subpersonalities (1993) p. 131
^ Rowan, p. 132
^ Ferrucci, p. 54-5
^ Parfitt, p. 88
^ Will Parfitt, The Elements of Psychosynthesis (Dorset 1996) p. 57
^ Parfitt, p. 58
^ Parfitt, p. 59-60 and p. 34
^ a b Assagioli, R. (1965). Psychosynthesis. New York: The Viking Press. p.20
^ Assagioli, R. (1973). The Act of Will. New York: Penguin Books. p.114
^ Assagioli, R. (1965). Psychosynthesis. New York: The Viking Press. p.16
^ Assaglioli, Psychosynthesis p. 77 and p. 98
^ Assagioli, R. (1965). Psychosynthesis. New York: The Viking Press. p.21
^ Molly Young Brown, Unfolding Self (2004) p. 146
^ Lombard, Catherine Ann (2014). "Coping with anxiety and rebuilding identity: A psychosynthesis approach to culture
shock" .
^ Lombard, Catherine Ann; Mller, Barbara C. N. (2016-06-30). "Opening the Door to Creativity A Psychosynthesis
Approach" . Journal of Humanistic Psychology: 0022167816653224. doi:10.1177/0022167816653224 . ISSN 00221678 .
^ a b c d Stewart, p. 392
^ Ferrucci, p. 25
^ Parfitt, p. 79 and p. 9
^ Stewart, p. 393
^ Keen, S. (1974). "The Golden Mean of Roberto Assagioli". Psychology Today.
converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com

45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.

^ Reinhard Kowalski, Discovering Your Self (1993) p. 13.


^ Walter T. Anderson, The Upstart Spring (2004) p. 265.
^ Assaglioli, Psychosynthesis p. 67.
^ Ferrucci, pp. 159-161.
^ Stephen Potter, Some Notes on Lifemanship (London 1950) p. 52
^ Potter, p. 52

converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com

converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com

References

[ edit ]

Psychosynthesis: A Collection of Basic Writings by Roberto Assagioli ISBN 0-9678570-0-7


The Act of Will by Roberto Assagioli ISBN 0-670-10309-8
What We May Be: Techniques for Psychological and Spiritual Growth Through Psychosynthesis by Piero Ferrucci
ISBN 0-87477-262-1
Unfolding Self: The Practice Of Psychosynthesis by Molly Young Brown ISBN 1-58115-383-X
Psychosynthesis: A Psychology of the Spirit by John Firman and Ann Gila ISBN 0-7914-5534-3
The Primal Wound: A Transpersonal View of Trauma, Addiction, and Growth by John Firman and Ann Gila ISBN 07914-3293-9
"Psychosynthesis: The Elements and Beyond" by Will Parfitt ISBN 978-0-9552786-0-0
A Psychology with a Soul: Psychosynthesis in Evolutionary Context by Jean Hardy ISBN 0-14-019218-2
Phenomenological, Existential, and Humanistic Psychologies: a Historical Survey by Henryk Misiak and Virginia
Staudt Sexton ISBN 0-8089-0814-6
Lombard, C.A. (2014).Coping with anxiety and rebuilding identity: A psychosynthesis approach to culture shock.
Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 27:2. http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/KmPD4Cfz6NhcyXEsdraS/full
Lombard, C.A. & Mller, B.C.M. (2016) Opening the Door to Creativity: A Psychosynthesis Approach Journal of
Humanistic Psychology, June 30, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0022167816653224.
http://jhp.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/06/24/0022167816653224.abstract

Bibliography

[ edit ]

Assagioli, R. (1965). Psychosynthesis. New York: The Viking Press.


_________. (1967). Jung and Psychosynthesis. New York: Psychosynthesis Research Foundation.
_________. (1973). The Act of Will. New York: Penguin Books.
Firman, J., & Gila, A. (1997). The primal wound: A transpersonal view of trauma, addiction, and growth. Albany, NY:
State University of New York Press.
_______________. (2002). Psychosynthesis: A psychology of the spirit. Albany, NY: State University of New York
Press.
Jung, C. G. 1954. The Development of Personality, Bollingen Series XX. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Maslow, Abraham. (1962). Toward a Psychology of Being. Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.
McGuire, William, ed. (1974). The Freud/Jung Letters. Vol. XCIV, Bollingen Series. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton
University Press.
Whitmore, D . (2013) Psychosynthesis Counselling in Action (Counselling in Action series) 4th Edition. Sage.
Srensen, Kenneth, (2016). The Soul of Psychosynthesis - The Seven Core Concepts. Kentaur Forlag

External links

[ edit ]

The Institute of Psychosynthesis The Institute of Psychosynthesis London, founded under the guidance of
Roberto Assagioli
The Psychosynthesis Trust founded by Roberto Assagioli
Re-Vision Centre for Integrative Psychosynthesis
Istituto di Psicosintesi The Institute of Psychosynthesis founded by Roberto Assagioli
Association for the Advancement of Psychosynthesis Psychosynthesis resources
Integral Psychosynthesis MA thesis on Integral Psychosynthesis
converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com

Training Schools:
The Institute of Psychosynthesis
Psychosynthesis Trust
Re-Vision
Istituto di Psicosintesi
The Synthesis Center
Categories: Humanistic psychology Human Potential Movement Spiritual evolution Systems psychology
Transpersonal psychology

This page was last modified on 3 November 2016, at 02:58.


Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use
and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view

converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen