0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
3 Ansichten1 Seite
This document discusses Philippine criminal procedure. It mentions the case Umil v Ramos, which established that for continuing offenses, where the crime is ongoing, an arrest may be made without an arrest warrant under Rule 113 as the suspect can be caught in the act of committing the offense.
This document discusses Philippine criminal procedure. It mentions the case Umil v Ramos, which established that for continuing offenses, where the crime is ongoing, an arrest may be made without an arrest warrant under Rule 113 as the suspect can be caught in the act of committing the offense.
This document discusses Philippine criminal procedure. It mentions the case Umil v Ramos, which established that for continuing offenses, where the crime is ongoing, an arrest may be made without an arrest warrant under Rule 113 as the suspect can be caught in the act of committing the offense.
1. Umil v Ramos a. In continuing offenses you are always committing and offense and may be arrested in falgranti delcitu without a warrant under Rule 113 2.