Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
In Partial Fulfillment of
The Requirements for the Course
LBYCVD2
Section:
EH1
Submitted by:
Deluria, Robert Paolo C.
Submitted to:
Dr. Bernardo A. Lejano
Date Submitted:
January 25, 2017
De La Salle University
Civil Engineering Department
Problem:
Solution:
Reactions = 537.5kN
Assumptions
Pa 806.25 2
Ag= = =5418.35 mm
0.60 Fy 0.60(248)
Check:
A. Tensile Rupture
Ae=uAn : An=Ag
x 55.23
u=1 =1 =0.72
L 200
B. Block Shear
Pa=0.3 FuAv+0.5 FuAt=0.3 ( 400 ) ( 200 x 14 x 2 ) +0.5 ( 400 )( 200 x 14 )=1408 kN > 806.25 kN
Design under LRFD Conditions:
Pu 1051.87 2
Ag= = =4712.68 mm
0.9 0 Fy 0.9 0 ( 248 )
Check:
A. Tensile Rupture
Ae=uAn : An=Ag
x 43.66
u=1 =1 =0.71
L 150
Ae=5103 ( 0.71 )=3623.13 m m2
Pa=( 0. 7 5 ) ( 400 ) ( 3623.13 )=1086.94 kN >1051.87 kN
B. Block Shear
Pa=0.45 FuAv+0. 7 5 FuAt
0.45 ( 400 ) ( 150 x 18 x 2 ) +0. 7 5 ( 400 ) ( 150 x 18 )
1782 kN >1051.78 kN
Comparison of results:
The results for under the ASD conditions have higher values compared to
those under the LRFD condition because ASD method of design is known to be very
conservative like when computing for the total P unlike LRFD having specific
reduction factors when computing for the total P. Due to ASD having larger values,
this means that the steel section to be used is also greater than that of the LRFD.
The ASD and LRFD sections are 200x200x16 with an area of 6179mm^2 and
150x150x18 with an area of 5103mm^2, respectively.