Program Office: Administration On Children, Youth and Families, Funding Opportunity Title

Department of Health & Human Services
Administration for Children and Families
Program Office: Administration on Children, Youth and Families,

Children's Bureau
Funding Targeted Grants to Increase the Well-Being of,

Opportunity Title: and to Improve the Permanency Outcomes for,
Children Affected by Methamphetamine or Other
Substance Abuse
Announcement Initial
Type:
Funding HHS-2007-ACF-ACYF-CU-0022
Opportunity
Number:
CFDA Number: 93.087
Due Date for 07/03/2007

Applications:
Executive Summary:
The Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Children's Bureau,

announces the availability of competitive grant funds authorized by the
Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF) program. These targeted
grants will be awarded to regional partnerships that provide, through
interagency collaboration and integration of programs and services,
activities and services that are designed to increase the well-being of,
improve permanency outcomes for, and enhance the safety of children
who are in an out-of-home placement or are at risk of being placed in
an out-of-home placement as a result of a parent's or caretaker's
methamphetamine or other substance abuse.
The Child and Family Services Improvement Act (Public Law (P.L.)
109-288) reauthorizes the PSSF program, through Fiscal Year (FY
2011) and includes a new targeted grants program (42 United States
Code (U.S.C.) 629g(f) which directs the Secretary of Health and
Human Services (HHS) to reserve a specified portion of the
appropriation for regional partnership grants to improve the well-being
of children affected by methamphetamine abuse or other substance
abuse.
1
Under this Program Announcement there are four Program Options:
two possible Federal award amounts, $500,000 or $1,000,000 per
budget period and two possible grant periods, three years or five
years. Applicants should note that initial Federal awards at the
$1,000,000 level will decline between the second and third year of a
three-year grant period and will decline between the second and fifth
year of a five-year grant period, due to the overall decline in
authorized Federal funds for this grant program over these grant
periods. Federal awards at the $500,000 level will remain fixed for the
duration of either a three- or five-year grant period. Applicants must
clearly state for which of these four program options they are
applying.
I. FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION
Legislative Authority
The Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program (section 437(f),

subpart 2, title IV-B, of the Social Security Act) (42 U.S.C. 629(f)(b))
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-
bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:s3525enr.txt.pdf
Funding Opportunity Description
Background Information
States and communities around the country are struggling to address

the safety, permanency and well-being of children in families in which
a parent's substance abuse has placed children at risk. The rise of
methamphetamine abuse, in particular, has recently increased the
visibility of these issues in many communities. It is estimated that 8.3
million children in the United States (U.S.) live with at least one parent
who abuses alcohol or who is in need of treatment for illicit drug use.
Impaired by their addiction, parents who abuse substances are less
likely to engage in appropriate parenting practices thereby depriving
children of basic nurturing activities and experiences. The high cost of
maintaining an addiction diverts a family's financial resources from
providing for basic family needs such as food, clothing, and housing.
Children whose parents abuse substances are more likely to have
poorer physical, intellectual, social, emotional and developmental
2
outcomes and, sadly, are at risk of becoming substance abusers
themselves.
Parental substance abuse is also a key factor underlying the abuse or

neglect experienced by many of the children who enter foster care or
are at risk of entering foster care. Many studies indicate that between
one-third and two-thirds of substantiated child maltreatment reports
involve substance abuse. Of children exposed to drugs prenatally,
approximately one-third will enter foster care within the first few years
of life. Children with open child welfare cases whose parents have
substance abuse problems also tend to be younger than other children
in the child welfare system, are more likely to be victims of severe or
chronic neglect, and are more likely than other children to be placed in
foster care rather than served while remaining at home. Once in foster
care, these children tend to remain in care for longer periods of time
than other children.
An important challenge facing both the child welfare and substance

abuse treatment fields is to take a comprehensive view of families'
situations and to understand the contributions of various problematic
behaviors to child maltreatment. The relationship between child
maltreatment and substance abuse is complicated by the presence of
other personal, health, environmental, social and economic factors
that confound the process of securing safe, stable homes for children,
as well as hinder the treatment process. For substance abuse
treatment to be effective and for children to remain safe, the full
spectrum of major family problems must be addressed. Finally, as
child welfare laws emphasize the need to make timely decisions
regarding the permanent placement of children in foster care, parents
with substance abuse disorders may have limited time to demonstrate
their readiness to provide a safe home environment for children. To
preserve families, child welfare workers and substance abuse
treatment providers must collaborate to accurately identify substance
use problems early and intervene quickly.
While substance abuse treatment is often effective in assisting clients

to achieve abstinence, quality treatment programs designed for
parents involved with the child welfare system, especially treatment
programs that target women with young children, are not widely
available in many communities. Historically, a number of issues have
contributed to the fragmentation of child welfare services and
substance abuse treatment, including:
1. Recruitment, engagement and retention of parents or

caretakers in substance abuse treatment. Many communities lack
3
residential or intensive outpatient family programs that would allow
children to remain with their parent(s) or caretaker(s) during
substance abuse treatment. In other communities, residential or
intensive outpatient family programs may exist, but may be unable to
meet the demand for such services, may not be able to provide for
adequate length of stay, and/or are often unable to coordinate
treatment with child welfare referring agencies. The inability of many
child welfare agencies to identify substance abuse problems early and
accurately also makes timely recruitment of substance-abusing
parents very difficult.
2. Differences in professional perspectives and policies

between child welfare workers and substance abuse treatment
providers. Professionals from the child welfare and substance abuse
fields may hold divergent views on: (1) defining the target client (child
or substance-abusing parent); (2) the treatment outcomes expected;
(3) acceptable timelines for demonstrating progress in treatment; (4)
responses to setbacks in treatment; and (5) other factors related to
the legal and policy environments in which substance abuse treatment
providers and child welfare agencies operate. State and Federal child
welfare laws, for example, prescribe limited timeframes in which to
offer family reunification services before alternative permanency
decisions must be made. Treating substance abuse disorders,
however, involves a complex and long-term recovery process.
Consequently, parents may have little time to demonstrate readiness
to provide safe homes for children who are in treatment. Also,
confusion over the confidentiality requirements of both fields can often
halt or slow the exchange of information between substance abuse
treatment providers and child welfare workers.
3. Chronic service shortages in both the child welfare and

substance abuse treatment systems. In the child welfare system,
issues such as high caseloads, staff turnover, and inadequate
caseworker training often hinder the efficiency and effectiveness of
case planning and timely caseworker visitation. For families with
substance abuse problems, accessing adequate treatment is also a
difficult task. A 1999 HHS report noted that only 37 percent of problem
drug users with children under age 18 reported receiving some form of
substance abuse treatment. The report also noted a recent decline in
the delivery of services often needed in conjunction with substance
abuse treatment such as parenting skills training, medical services,
mental health services, legal aid, and vocational training. More recent
data suggest that accessing adequate treatment remains difficult. In
2005, 23.2 million persons ages 12 or older needed treatment for an
illicit drug or alcohol use problem. Of these, only 2.3 million or about
4
10 percent received treatment (U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration,
2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings;
http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nsduh/2k5nsduh/2k5results.htm#7.3).
For many families addressing substance abuse alone is not likely to
produce the changes in a family that are necessary to ensure a healthy
home environment for children. Even if a parent achieves abstinence,
other issues such as inadequate housing and poor parenting skills may
continue to pose safety risks for the child.
In recent years, HHS has undertaken a number of projects and

activities to explore and address the issue of substance abuse among
families involved with the child welfare system. A number of these
projects are described below, along with links to websites containing
further information. Applicants may wish to review these resources as
they develop their applications.
The 1999 ACF and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA) report to Congress on substance abuse and
child welfare, Blending Perspectives and Building Common Ground,
described the extent and scope of the problem of substance abuse in
the child welfare population, the types of services provided to this
population, and the effectiveness of these services. The report also
made recommendations for legislative changes needed to improve
service coordination. Applicants are encouraged to review the full
report online: http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/subabuse99/subabuse.htm.
One outgrowth of the Blending Perspectives report was the creation of

the National Center on Substance Abuse and Child Welfare (NCSACW),
established through a memorandum of understanding between
SAMHSA and ACF. NCSACW's goals are to develop and implement a
comprehensive program of information gathering and dissemination,
to provide technical assistance, and to develop knowledge that
promotes effective practice, and organizational and system changes at
the local, state, and national levels. Substance abuse treatment
providers and child welfare workers are also able to participate in free
online courses on a range of practice issues, including training about
how professionals from both fields can effectively collaborate to
improve services to families. These courses are available online at
NCSACW's website at: http://www.ncsacw.samhsa.gov.
HHS has supported other approaches to identifying and addressing

substance abuse issues in the child welfare population through child
welfare waiver demonstrations. These waivers have allowed some
States to use title IV-E foster care funds more flexibly in order to
5
improve outcomes for children and families in the child welfare
system. Delaware, New Hampshire, Maryland, and Illinois have
participated in waiver demonstrations targeting the problem of
substance abuse in the child welfare system. Outcomes and lessons
from these projects were published by the Children's Bureau in 2005.
Applicants are encouraged to review a synthesis of these findings
online at:
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/programs_fund/cwwaiver/substa
nceabuse/index.htm.
With the implementation of the Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA)
and renewed emphasis on achieving permanency for children in the
child welfare system, finding effective and timely methods to address
the concurrent family problems of substance abuse and child
maltreatment is critical. In implementing grant-funded services or
activities, applicants should understand the timelines for permanency
planning prescribed by ASFA so that informed permanency decisions
can be made within timeframes dictated both by children's
developmental needs and the requirements of ASFA. Applicants may
review the ASFA legislation online at:
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-
bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=105_cong_bills&docid=f:h867enr.txt.pdf.
Finally, applicants may review a variety of print and electronic

publications, websites, and online databases at Child Welfare
Information Gateway. Resources covering a wide range of topics from
prevention to permanency, including child welfare, child abuse and
neglect, and adoption can be accessed online at:
http://www.childwelfare.gov.
ACF seeks to promote the development of strategies to improve

collaboration between substance abuse treatment providers and the
child welfare system in order to improve the safety, permanency, and
well-being of children and their families. Grants awarded under this
funding announcement will be expected to assist regional partnerships
in establishing or enhancing a collaborative infrastructure capable of
building the region's capacity to meet a broad range of needs for
families involved with both substance abuse treatment and the child
welfare system.
Applicants may choose to test a broad-based approach to substance

abuse treatment and child welfare services collaboration, or they may
choose to focus their efforts on a particular point along the continuum
of care from prevention to treatment to aftercare services. When
considering an approach to grant-funded services and when
6
anticipating program outcomes, applicants should review the
conceptual framework included at the end of this announcement.
Grantees are encouraged to recruit a local evaluator to assist in
developing plans to monitor required performance indicators, as well
as to assist in assessing the performance and impact of grant-funded
services and activities.
Examples of services and activities that applicants might propose to

engage in or integrate into existing service delivery systems include:
1. Systems Collaboration and Improvements
• Support for inter-agency and inter-organization collaboration to

support management activities that will provide oversight and
make ongoing improvements to the activities carried out through
the grant.
• Comprehensive training to ensure that all partners involved in
the proposed collaborative (e.g., child welfare, judges,
attorneys, court professionals, community mental health and
primary care providers, law enforcement professionals, school
personnel) fully understand substance abuse and dependence
and are trained to intervene appropriately with parents.
Similarly, alcohol and drug treatment professionals may be
trained to understand risk assessment, court rules, and other
child welfare requirements impacting their clients.
• Improvements in cross-system information sharing mechanisms
to ensure consistent data collection across systems,
comprehensive methods to monitor outcomes are in place, and
sharing of information, with appropriate releases of confidential
information, across systems. While applicants must observe
confidentiality requirements, substance abuse treatment
providers and child welfare agencies are strongly encouraged to
specify a mechanism or draft a memorandum of understanding
to obtain informed consent to ensure that protected client
information can be shared when necessary.
• Support for family drug courts to provide a system of more
frequent court appearances for parents with allegations of
substance use, and immediate rewards and sanctions based on
compliance with court orders regarding the recovery plan. Grant
funds could be used to support the capacity of the court(s) to
provide increased case monitoring for cases under the
jurisdiction of the dependency court.
2. Treatment Linkages
7
• Universal alcohol and drug screening using standardized alcohol
and drug screening questionnaires to determine the extent to
which substance abuse might be a contributing factor in ALL
cases to which the child welfare agency responds.
• Co-location of staff to enhance cross-agency communication and
provide substance abuse treatment expertise within child welfare
agencies and the courts.
• Specialized engagement and recovery management services to
be provided under a variety of possible arrangements,
engagement strategies and immediate access to substance
abuse assessments at the first court hearing. This function may
provide for staff stationed at the family court to intervene and
conduct preliminary assessments with ALL parents with
substance abuse allegations; intensive management of the
recovery aspect of the child welfare case plan; and/or routine
monitoring and feedback to the child welfare agency and the
court.
3. Services for Children and Youth
• Drug Endangered Children (DEC) programs to respond to the

crisis intervention needs of families involved in
methamphetamine manufacturing including field medical
assessments and coordination of medical and mental health
follow-up service for children found at methamphetamine home
laboratories.
• Services to substance-exposed newborns to enhance
identification and intervention with infants identified as
substance-exposed at birth and coordination/enhancement of
services to be delivered under the Individuals With Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA) Part C. This could include programs such
as home visiting services or referrals and linkages for medical
and/or developmental follow-up with pediatric specialists
knowledgeable about fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and
exposure to other commonly abused drugs.
• Developmental assessment and services to provide access to
screening and assessment, and intervention with children
identified as needing services to address developmental delays
across a spectrum of childhood development indicators, such as
linguistic, motor, and cognitive processing skills.
• Mental health and child counseling to enhance access to
appropriate mental health and counseling services for children
involved in the child welfare system as a result of parental
substance use disorders.
8
• Early intervention and preventive services for children and
adolescents to provide access to participation in evidence-based
programs and services for children and adolescents to address
the increased risk for intergenerational abuse and dependence
on alcohol and other drugs.
• Substance abuse treatment for adolescents to provide increased
capacity to provide developmentally appropriate treatment
services to adolescent family members who, like their parent(s),
have a diagnosable substance use disorder.
4. Substance Abuse Treatment Services
• Timely access to comprehensive substance abuse treatment to

ensure that families in the child welfare system have priority
access to comprehensive substance abuse treatment services
(and concurrent mental health services as needed) that meet the
needs of the entire family, including:
• Long-term residential treatment programs where children can
live on-site with mothers, and where children's father and/or the
mother's partner is served as well (in residence or not). Services
are provided for all family members, including access to family
counseling and individual care plans for the adult and child
members of the family.
• Intensive out-patient treatment with or without a housing
component (i.e., sober living homes). Services are provided for
family members as well, including access to family counseling
and individual care plans for the adult and child members of the
family.
5. Other Services for Parents
• Parenting skills training (as part of substance abuse treatment or

stand alone) to provide evidenced-based strategies to promote
the parenting abilities of parents who are receiving in-home child
welfare services, or whose children have been removed with
goals of reunification.
• Training for foster parents, relatives and other substitute
caretakers about the special needs of children and youth who
have suffered from abuse or neglect and whose parents have a
substance use disorder. For example, training might focus on the
support of caretakers who are caring for an adolescent with a
substance abuse problem.
9
• Family counseling to strengthen family functioning and assist
with reunification of families when children have been in out of
home placements.
• Continuing care and recovery support services to support the
ongoing recovery of parents after residential or intensive
outpatient treatment, through ongoing connections to treatment
and community support services such as Alcoholics Anonymous
or Narcotics Anonymous and ongoing case management.
• Ancillary services for families to provide assistance in securing
needed services such as safe and drug-free housing,
transportation and child care.
Since applicants are required to demonstrate the target region's lack

of capacity for, or access to, comprehensive family treatment and
services, regional partners may consider several methods of
addressing service barriers. For example, a community may only have
adult-only residential or intensive outpatient programs and lack the
capacity to serve family members. Alternatively, a community may
have residential or intensive outpatient family programs, but may not
be able to meet demand for such services, provide for adequate length
of stay, coordinate treatment with child welfare referring agencies, or
provide services that can accommodate the linguistic and cultural
experience of the family. To address these issues, applicants may
consider proposing to expand the region's capacity for comprehensive
family treatment by: (1) adding an array of services for children and
other family members; (2) increasing capacity to serve more families
referred from child welfare and/or the family drug or dependency
courts; (3) extending treatment services to the family for longer
periods of time; (4) providing for treatment linkage programs to
increase the number of successful referrals to treatment once parents
are identified as having a substance use disorder in need of
intervention; or (5) enhancing existing treatment services to hire staff
with the needed language skills and tailor services to the cultural
background of clients.
Evaluation
The Evaluation portion of the Evaluation Criteria section of this

announcement provides specific information about what reviewers will
be measuring when they read applications for funding under this
program announcement. Assistance may be found in a document titled
"Program Manager's Guide to Evaluation." A copy of this document
can be accessed
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/other_resrch/pm_guide_eval/r
eports/pmguide/pmguide_toc.html.
10
Assurances
The acceptance of funds for projects responsive to this announcement

will signify the applicant's assurance that it will comply with the
following requirements:
1. Have the project fully functioning within 90 days following the

notification of the grant award.
2. Address all program requirements listed in this announcement.
3. Participate if the Children's Bureau chooses to do a national
evaluation or a technical assistance contract that relates to this
funding announcement.
4. Submit all performance indicator data, program, and financial
reports in a timely manner, in recommended format (to be
provided), and submit the final report on disk or electronically
using a standard word-processing program.
5. Submit annual reports to the Secretary not later than September
30 of the first fiscal year in which a recipient of a grant is paid
funds and a report is due annually thereafter until September 30
of the last fiscal year in which the recipient is paid funds under
the grant.
6. Submit a copy of the final report, the evaluation report, and any
program products to Child Welfare Information Gateway within
90 days of project end date. This is in addition to the standard
requirement that the final program and evaluation report must
also be submitted to the Grants Management Specialist and the
Federal Project Officer.
7. Allocate sufficient funds in the budget to:
a. Provide for the project director, the evaluator, and other
key partners to attend an early kickoff meeting for
grantees funded under this program announcement to be
held within the first three months of the project (first year
only) in Washington, D.C.
b. Provide for the project director, the evaluator, and other
key partners to attend an annual three-day grantees'
meeting in Washington, D.C.
c. Provide for the project director, the evaluator, and other
key partners to attend one annual training meeting in
Washington, D.C.
Description of Funding Arrangements
The legislation outlines a number of specific requirements for funds

awarded under this announcement, including that: (1) the annual
Federal award may not exceed $1,000,000; (2) the annual Federal
11
award may not fall below $500,000; (3) a grant period may not
exceed five years; (4) the grantee's required match must increase
over the course of the grant period, such that grantees must
contribute 15 percent of the costs of grant-funded services and
activities in FY 2007 and FY 2008, 20 percent of such costs in FY 2009
and FY 2010, and 25 percent of such costs in FY 2011; and (5) the
legislatively authorized funding levels for this grant program decreases
each year from $40 million in the first year (or first 12-month budget
period) to $20 million in the fifth year (or final 12-month budget
period).
In proposing a grant program budget, applicants are encouraged to

carefully review the tables below that describe the annual variations in
Federal share, grantee match, and total award amount between FYs
2007-2011. There are two possible Federal award amounts, $500,000
or $1,000,000 per budget period and two possible grant periods, three
years or five years. Applicants should note that initial Federal awards
at the $1,000,000 level will decline between the second and third year
of a three-year grant period and will decline between the second and
fifth year of a five-year grant period, due to the overall decline in
authorized Federal funds for this grant program over these grant
periods. Federal awards at the $500,000 level will remain fixed for the
duration of either a three- or five-year grant period.
Applicants are required to select ONE of the following Program

Options, justify their selection in terms of accomplishing their project
goals and demonstrate their organizational capacity to manage the
proposed project over the selected grant period:
Program Option 1: $1,000,000 annual award for 3 years (declining);
Program Option 2: $1,000,000 annual award for 5 years (declining);
Program Option 3: $500,000 annual award for 3 years (fixed); or
Program Option 4: $500,000 annual award for 5 years (fixed).
Applicants must state for which of these four program options

they are applying and justify their selection in terms of
accomplishing their project goals. An applicant may only apply
for one Program Option.
Applicants should include in their proposal a program budget for each

of the award years and outline how they will satisfy the increasing
match required over the selected grant period, based on the tables
below.
12
Applicants selecting a Federal award at the initial level of $1,000,000
should also describe how they will accommodate the declining total
award amount in the second and third years of the grant period (if
applying for a three-year award) or the second and fifth years of the
grant period (if applying for a five-year award). The non-Federal share
of the cost of services provided or activities conducted with funding
under this announcement may be in cash or in-kind and must be
detailed in the budget.
Pre-Application Conference. The Children's Bureau will be

sponsoring a pre-application conference for all parties interested in
applying for the Targeted Discretionary Grants Addressing Needs of
Families Affected by Methamphetamine and Other Substance Abuse.
The purpose of the conference is to assist applicants to develop

effective applications and respond to questions about the program
announcement.
A recording and transcript of the applicant conference will be posted at

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_cb.html following the
conference and will be available until the closing date of the
announcement.
Information pertaining to this pre-application conference can be found

at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/grantreview/ or by contacting
the ACYF Operations Center, c/o The Dixon Group, Inc. ATTN:
Children's Bureau, 866-796-1591 or TTY 711, cb@dixongroup.com.
II. AWARD INFORMATION
Program Option 1. $1,000,000 annual award for 3 years

(Declining Federal award)
Funding Instrument Type: Grant
Anticipated Total Priority Area $20,600,000

Funding:
Anticipated Number of Awards: 1 to 8
Ceiling on Amount of Individual $2,575,000

Awards:
13
Floor on Amount of Individual $2,575,000 per project period
Awards:
Average Projected Award Amount: $2,575,000 per project period
Length of Project Periods: 36-month project period with three

12-month budget periods
Total Program
Funds
Fiscal Federal Federal Grantee Grantee
(Federal Award
Year Share Award Share Match
+ Grantee
Match)
2007 85% 1,000,000 15% 176,000 1,176,000
2008 85% 825,000 15% 146,000 971,000
2009 80% 750,000 20% 188,000 938,000
Program Option 2. $1,000,000 annual award for 5 years

(Declining Federal award)
Anticipated Total Program Option $18,710,000

2 Funding:
Ceiling of Amounts of Individual $3,742,000

Awards:

Awards:
Length of Project Periods: 60-month project period with five 12-

month budget periods
Total Program
Fiscal Federal Federal Grantee Grantee Funds
Year Share Award Share Match (Federal Award
+ Grantee
14
Match)
2007 85% 1,000,000 15% 176,000 1,176,000
2008 85% 825,000 15% 146,000 971,000
2009 80% 750,000 20% 188,000 938,000
2010 80% 667,000 20% 167,000 834,000
2011 75% 500,000 25% 167,000 667,000
Program Option 3. $500,000 annual award for 3 years (Fixed

Federal award)

3 Funding:

Awards:

Awards:
Length of Project Periods: 36-month project period with three

12-month budget periods”
Total Program
Fiscal Federal Federal Grantee Grantee Funds
Year Share Award Share Match (Federal Award +
Grantee Match)
2007 85% 500,000 15% 88,000 588,000
2008 85% 500,000 15% 88,000 588,000
2009 80% 500,000 20% 125,000 625,000
Program Option 4. $500,000 annual award for 5 years (Fixed

Federal award)
15
4 Funding:

Awards:

Awards:
Length of Project Periods: 60-month project period with five 12-

month budget periods
Total Program
Funds
Fiscal Federal Federal Grantee Grantee
(Federal Award
Year Share Award Share Match
+ Grantee
Match)
2007 85% 500,000 15% 88,000 588,000
2008 85% 500,000 15% 88,000 588,000
2009 80% 500,000 20% 125,000 625,000
2010 80% 500,000 20% 125,000 625,000
2011 75% 500,000 25% 167,000 667,000
Awards under this announcement are subject to the availability

of funds.
III. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION
1. Eligible Applicants:
• State governments
• County governments
• Local Governments
16
• City or township governments
• Regional Organizations
• U.S. Territory or Possession
• Independent school districts
• Public and State-controlled institutions of higher education
• Indian/Native American Tribal governments (Federally
recognized)
• Indian/Native American Tribal organizations (other than
Federally recognized)
• Indian/Native American Tribally Designated Organizations
• Public/Indian Housing Authorities
• Non-profits with 501(c)(3) IRS status (other than institutions of
higher education)
• Non-profits without 501(c)(3) IRS status (other than institutions
of higher education)
• Private institutions of higher education
• For-profit organizations (other than small businesses)
• Small businesses
• Hispanic-Serving Institutions
• Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)
• Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities (TCCUs)
• Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Serving Institutions
• Special district governments
Faith-based and community organizations that meet the statutory

eligibility requirements are eligible to apply under this announcement.
Foreign entities are not eligible under this announcement.
Applications must represent regional partnerships formed by a

collaborative agreement.
Applications must identify a primary applicant responsible for

administering the grant.
The primary applicant MUST be one of the regional

partnership organizations listed below. The primary applicant cannot
be an individual.
Regional partnerships may be established on an interstate or intrastate

basis and must be between at least two of the following parties:
• The State child welfare agency that is responsible for the

administration of the State plan under title IV-B or title IV-E of
the Social Security Act;
17
• The State agency responsible for administering the substance
abuse prevention and treatment block grant provided under
subpart II of part B of title XIX of the Public Health Service Act;
• An Indian Tribe or Tribal consortium;
• Non-profit or for-profit child welfare service providers;
• Community health service providers;
• Community mental health providers;
• Local law enforcement agencies;
• Judges and court personnel;
• Juvenile justice officials;
• School personnel;
• Tribal child welfare agencies or a consortia of such agencies; or
• Any other providers, agencies, personnel, officials, or entities
that are related to the provision of child and family services
under this subsection.
As required by the legislation, if the partnership is an Indian Tribe or

Tribal consortia they may not enter into a collaborative agreement
only with Tribal child welfare agencies (or a consortium of such
agencies).
Applications must identify a lead applicant responsible for

administration of the grant. Any member of the regional partnership is
eligible to be a lead applicant provided that: (1) the partner is one of
the eligible entities described above; and (2) the member agency or
organization has the capacity to sufficiently monitor program activities
or services, funding, and reporting requirements described in this
announcement. While either the State child welfare agency that is
responsible for the State plan under title IV-B or title IV-E of the Social
Security Act or an Indian Tribe or Tribal consortium must be a member
of a regional partnership it is NOT necessary that either of these
entities serve as the lead agency. Any eligible entity may be a member
of more than one regional partnership application, but each regional
partnership may only apply for ONE of the four program options in this
program announcement.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: Yes
Grantees are required to meet a non-Federal share of the project

costs, in accordance with the Promoting Safe and Stable Families
program (section 437(f), subpart 2, title IV-B, of the Social Security
Act) (42 U.S.C. 629(f)(b))
See II Award Information for details of grantee match requirements for

each of the four program options.
18
3. Other:
Any eligible entity may be a member of more than one regional

partnership application, but each regional partnership may only apply
for ONE of the four program options.
Disqualification Factors
Applications with requests that exceed the ceiling amount (for

research projects) or the upper range value (for all other
projects) will be deemed non-responsive and will not be
considered for funding under this announcement. See Section
II., Award Information.
Any application that fails to satisfy the deadline requirements
referenced in Section IV.3., Submission Dates and Times, will be
deemed non-responsive and will not be considered for funding
under this announcement.
IV. APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION
1. Address to Request Application Package:
ACYF Operations Center

c/o The Dixon Group, Inc.
ATTN: Children's Bureau
118 Q St., NE.
Washington, DC 20002-2132
2. Content and Form of Application Submission:
Each application must contain the following items in the order listed:
Application for Federal Assistance. (Standard Form (SF) 424).

Follow the instructions below and those that accompany the form.
• In Item 5 of SF-424, put D-U-N-S number in "Organizational D-

U-N-S:" box.
• In Item 5 of SF-424, include name, phone number, and, if
available, email and fax numbers of the contact person.
• In Item 8 of SF-424, check 'New.'
• In Item 10 of SF-424, clearly identify the Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) program title and number for the
program for which funds are being requested as stated in this
funding opportunity announcement.
19
• In Item 11 of SF-424, identify the single funding opportunity the
application addresses. Applicants must clearly state for
which of the four Program Options they are applying.
• In Item 12 of SF-424, identify the specific geographic area to be
served.
• In Item 14 of SF-424, identify Congressional districts of both the
applicant and project.
Budget Information. Non-Construction Programs (SF-424A) and

Budget Justification. Follow the instructions provided here and those in
Section V, Application Review Information. Note that Federal funds
provided to States and services or other resources purchased with
Federal funds may not be used to match project grants. Applicants
should include in their proposal a program budget for each of the
award years and outline how they will satisfy the increasing match
required over the selected grant period.
Certifications/Assurances. Applicants requesting financial

assistance for non-construction projects must file the SF-424B,
"Assurances: Non-Construction Programs." Applicants must sign and
return the SF-424B with their applications.
Applicants must file the Certification Regarding Lobbying when

applying for an award in excess of $100,000. Applicants must sign and
return the certification with their applications.
If applicable, applicants must disclose lobbying activities on the SF-

LLL. See the information on the Certification Regarding Lobbying form
for further information.
Applicants must make the appropriate certification regarding

environmental tobacco smoke. By signing and submitting the
application, the applicant is providing the certification and need not
mail back the certification with the applications.
Project Summary/Abstract (one page maximum, double spaced).

Applicants must clearly state for which of the four Program Options
they are applying. Clearly mark this page with the applicant name as
shown on Item 5 of SF-424, identify the competitive grant funding
opportunity and the title of the proposed project as shown in Item 11
and the service area as shown in Item 12 of SF-424. The summary
description should not exceed 300 words.
Care should be taken to produce a summary/abstract that accurately

and concisely reflects the proposed project. It should describe the
20
objectives of the project, the approach to be used, and the results or
benefits expected.
The Project Description. Applicants must clearly state for which of

the four Program Options they are applying. Applicants should
organize their project description in this sequence: 1) Objectives and
Need for Assistance; 2) Approach; 3) Evaluation; 4) Organizational
Profiles; and 5) Budget and Budget Justification.
Non-Federal Resources. Provide a letter of commitment verifying

the actual amount of the non-Federal share of project costs (see
Section III.2) for each of the award years over the selected grant
period.
Indirect Charges. If claiming indirect costs, provide documentation

that the applicant currently has an indirect cost-rate approved by HHS
or another cognizant Federal agency.
Third-Party Agreements. Include a letter of commitment or

memorandum of understanding from each partner and/or sub-
contractor describing their role, detailing specific project tasks to be
performed, and expressing commitment to participate if the proposed
project is funded. Note: general letters of support are not required nor
do the evaluation criteria ask about the extent to which there are
letters of support so do not include general letters of support.
Page Limit. The application limit is 100 pages total including all forms
and attachments. Pages over this page limit will be removed from the
application and will not be reviewed.
General Content and Form Information. To be considered for

funding, each application must be submitted with the Standard Federal
Forms (provided at the end of this announcement or through the
electronic links provided) and following the guidance provided. The
application must be signed by an individual authorized to act for the
applicant agency and to assume responsibility for the obligations
imposed by the terms and conditions of the grant award.
The application must be typed, double spaced, printed on only one

side, with at least 1-inch margins on each side and 1 inch at the top
and bottom, using standard 12-point fonts (such as Times New Roman
or Courier). All pages must be numbered. When spacing, margins, and
font instructions are not followed, ACF will remove and not review
excess pages.
All copies of an application must be submitted in a single package, and

a separate package must be submitted for each funding opportunity.
21
The package must be clearly labeled for the specific funding
opportunity it is addressing.
Because each application will be duplicated, do not use or include

separate covers, binders, clips, tabs, plastic inserts, maps, brochures,
or any other items that cannot be processed easily on a photocopy
machine with an automatic feed. Do not bind, clip, staple, or fasten in
any way separate subsections of the application, including supporting
documentation. Use a clip (not a staple) to securely bind the
application together. Applicants are advised that the copies of the
application submitted, not the original, will be reproduced by the
Federal Government for review.
Tips for Preparing a Competitive Application. It is essential that

applicants read the entire announcement package carefully before
preparing an application and include all of the required application
forms and attachments. The application must reflect a thorough
understanding of and support the purpose and objectives of the
applicable legislation. Reviewers expect applicants to understand the
goals of the legislation and the Children's Bureau's interest in each
topic. A "responsive application" is one that addresses and follows all
of the evaluation criteria in ways that demonstrate this understanding.
Applications that are considered to be "unresponsive" or do not clearly
address the evaluation criteria or program requirements generally
receive very low scores and are rarely funded.
The Children's Bureau's website

(http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb) provides a wide range of
information and links to other relevant websites. Before you begin
preparing an application, ACF suggests that the applicant learn more
about the mission and programs of the Children's Bureau by exploring
the website.
Organizing An Application. Reviewers will use the specific

evaluation criteria in Section V of this funding announcement to review
and evaluate each application. The applicant should address each of
these specific evaluation criteria in the project description. Applicants
should organize their project description in this sequence: 1)
Objectives and Need for Assistance; 2) Approach; 3) Evaluation; 4)
Organizational Profiles; and 5) Budget and Budget Justification. The
applicant must use the same headings as these criteria, so that
reviewers can readily find information that directly addresses each of
the specific review criteria. .
Protection of Human Subjects. Evaluation plans that include

obtaining identifiable private information about clients may involve
22
non-exempt human subjects research and require compliance with
HHS Protection of Human Subjects regulations (45 CFR Part 46).
Applicants proposing such research are asked to describe (a) the
procedures for protecting the privacy of clients and ensuring the
confidentiality of data collected about clients; and (b) the process for
obtaining institutional review board (IRB) review of the proposed
evaluation plans. While IRB approval is not required at the time of
award, applicants proposing non-exempt human subjects research will
be required, as a condition of award, to hold a Federal-wide Assurance
(FWA) approved by the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP)
and to provide certification to ACF that an IRB designated under the
FWA has reviewed and approved the research prior to enrolling any
subjects in the proposed evaluation. Certifications of IRB approval may
be submitted to ACF using the form at
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/assurance/OF310.rtf.
General information about the HHS Protection of Human Subjects

regulations can be obtained on the web at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp.
You may also contact OHRP by e-mail (ohrp@csophs.dhhs.gov) or by
phone (240-453-6900).
D-U-N-S Requirement
All applicants must have a D&B Data Universal Numbering System (D-
U-N-S) number. On June 27, 2003, the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) published in the Federal Register a new Federal policy
applicable to all Federal grant applicants. The policy requires Federal
grant applicants to provide a D-U-N-S number when applying for
Federal grants or cooperative agreements on or after October 1,
2003. The D-U-N-S number will be required whether an applicant is
submitting a paper application or using the government-wide
electronic portal, Grants.gov. A D-U-N-S number will be required for
every application for a new award or renewal/continuation of an
award, including applications or plans under formula, entitlement, and
block grant programs, submitted on or after October 1, 2003.
Please ensure that your organization has a D-U-N-S number. You may
acquire a D-U-N-S number at no cost by calling the dedicated toll-free
D-U-N-S number request line at 1-866-705-5711 or you may request
a number on-line at http://www.dnb.com.
Proof of Non-Profit Status
Non-profit organizations applying for funding are required to submit

proof of their non-profit status.
23
Proof of non-profit status is any one of the following:
• A reference to the applicant organization's listing in the IRS's

most recent list of tax-exempt organizations described in the IRS
Code.
• A copy of a currently valid IRS tax-exemption certificate.
• A statement from a State taxing body, State attorney general, or
other appropriate State official certifying that the applicant
organization has non-profit status and that none of the net
earnings accrue to any private shareholders or individuals.
• A certified copy of the organization's certificate of incorporation
or similar document that clearly establishes non-profit status.
• Any of the items in the subparagraphs immediately above for a
State or national parent organization and a statement signed by
the parent organization that the applicant organization is a local
non-profit affiliate.
When applying electronically, we strongly suggest that you attach your

proof of non-profit status with your electronic application.
Private, non-profit organizations are encouraged to submit with their

applications the survey titled "Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity
for Applicants" found under the "Survey" heading at:
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html.
Forms, Assurances, and Certifications
The project description should include all the information requirements

described in the specific evaluation criteria outlined in this program
announcement under Section V. Application Review Information. In
addition to the project description, the applicant needs to complete all
of the Standard Forms required as part of the application process for
awards under this announcement.
Applicants seeking financial assistance under this announcement must

file the appropriate Standard Forms (SFs) as described in this
section. All applicants must submit an SF-424, Application for Federal
Assistance. For non-construction programs, applicants must also
submit an SF-424A, Budget Information and an SF-424B,
Assurances. For construction programs, applicants must also submit
SF-424C, Budget Information and SF-424D, Assurances. For research
programs that involve human subjects, the Protection of Human
Subjects Assurance Identification/IRB Certification/Declaration of
Exemption form must be submitted. All forms may be reproduced for
24
use in submitting applications. Applicants must sign and return the
standard forms with their application.
Applicants must furnish, prior to award, an executed copy of the

Certification Regarding Lobbying. Applicants must sign and return the
certification with their application. The Certification Regarding
Lobbying may be found at:
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html. (If any funds
have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or
attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a
Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an
employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this
commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a
loan, the applicant shall complete and submit Standard Form (SF)-LLL,
"Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its
instructions.)
Applicants must also understand that they will be held accountable for
the smoking prohibition included within Public Law (P.L.) 103-227,
Title XII Environmental Tobacco Smoke (also known as the Pro
Children Act of 1994). A copy of the Federal Register notice that
implements the smoking prohibition is included with this form. By
signing and submitting the application, applicants are providing the
necessary certification and are not required to return it.
Applicants must make the appropriate certification of their compliance

with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. By signing and
submitting the application, applicants are providing the necessary
certification and are not required to return it. Complete the standard
forms and the associated certifications and assurances based on the
instructions on the forms. The forms and certifications may be found
at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html.

Please see Section V.1 for instructions on preparing the full project
description.
Please reference Section IV.3 for details about acknowledgement of

received applications.
Electronic Submission
25
Applicants to ACF may submit their applications in either electronic or
paper format. To submit an application electronically, please use the
http://www.Grants.gov site.
When using www.Grants.gov, applicants will be able to download a

copy of the application package, complete it off-line, and then upload
and submit the application via the www.Grants.gov site. ACF will not
accept grant applications via facsimile or email.
Acceptable electronic formats for the application attachments

(narratives, charts, etc.) must use the following standard technologies,
i.e., Microsoft (Word and Excel), Word Perfect, Adobe PDF, Jpeg, and
Gif.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Before submitting an electronic application,

applicants must complete the organization registration process as well
as obtain and register "electronic signature credentials" for the
Authorized Organization Representative (AOR). Since this process may
take more than five business days, it is important to start this process
early, well in advance of the application deadline. Be sure to
complete all www.Grants.gov registration processes listed on
the Organization Registration Checklist, which can be found at
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/registration_checklist.html.
Please note the following if planning to submit an application

electronically via www.Grants.gov:
• Electronic submission is voluntary, but strongly encouraged.

• Applicants may access the electronic application for this program
at http://www.Grants.gov. There applicants can search for the
downloadable application package by utilizing the
www.Grants.gov FIND function.
• It is strongly recommended that applicants do not wait
until the application deadline date to begin the application
process through www.Grants.gov. Applicants are
encouraged to submit their applications well before the closing
date and time so that if difficulties are encountered there will still
be sufficient time to submit a hard copy via express mail. It is
to an applicant's advantage to submit 24 hours ahead of
the closing date and time in order to address any
difficulties that may be encountered.
• To use www.Grants.gov, you, the applicant must have a D-U-N-
S number and register in the Central Contractor Registry
(CCR). Applicants should allow a minimum of five days to
complete the CCR registration. REMINDER: CCR registration
26
expires each year and thus must be updated annually.
Applicants cannot upload an application to
www.Grants.gov without having a current CCR
registration AND electronic signature credentials for the
AOR.
• The electronic application is submitted by the AOR. To submit
electronically, the AOR must obtain and register electronic
signature credentials approved by the organization's E-Business
Point of Contact who maintains the organization's CCR
registration.
• Applicants may submit all documents electronically, including all
information typically included on the SF-424 and all necessary
assurances and certifications.
• Though applying electronically, the application must still comply
with any page limitation requirements described in this program
announcement.
• After the application is submitted electronically, the applicant will
receive an automatic acknowledgement from www.Grants.gov
that contains a www.Grants.gov tracking number. ACF will
retrieve the electronically submitted application from
www.Grants.gov.
• ACF may request that the applicant provide original signatures
on forms at a later date.
• Applicants will not receive additional point value for submitting a
grant application in electronic format, nor will ACF penalize an
applicant if they submit an application in hard copy.
• If any difficulties are encountered in using www.Grants.gov,
please contact the Grants.gov Contact Center at: 1-800-518-
4726, or by email at support@grants.gov to report the problem
and obtain assistance.
• Checklists and registration brochures are maintained to assist
applicants in the registration process and may be found at:
http://www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp.
• When submitting electronically via www.Grants.gov, applicants
must comply with all due dates AND times referenced in Section
IV.3. Submission Dates and Times.
• For applicants that must demonstrate proof of non-profit status
before the award date, ACF strongly suggests that proof of non-
profit status be attached to the electronic application. Proof of
non-profit status and any other required documentation may be
scanned and attached as an "Other Attachment." Acceptable
types of proof of non-profit status are stated earlier in this
section.
27
• The Grants.gov website complies with Section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Grants.gov webpages are designed to
work with assistive technologies such as screen readers. If an
applicant uses assistive technology and is unable to access any
material on the site, email the www.Grants.gov contact center at
support@grants.gov for assistance.
Hard Copy Submission
Applicants that are submitting their application in paper format should

submit one original and two copies of the complete application. The
original and each of the two copies must include all required forms,
certifications, assurances, and appendices, be signed by an authorized
representative, and be unbound. The original copy of the application
must have original signature(s).
Non-Federal Reviewers
Since ACF will be using non-Federal reviewers in the review process,

applicants have the option of omitting from the application copies (not
the original) specific salary rates or amounts for individuals specified in
the application budget as well as Social Security Numbers, if otherwise
required for individuals. The copies may include summary salary
information.
If applicants are submitting their application electronically, ACF will

omit the same specific salary rate information from copies made for
use during the review and selection process.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Due Date for Applications: 07/03/2007
Explanation of Due Dates
The due date for receipt of applications is referenced

above. Applications received after 4:30 p.m., eastern time, on the
due date will be classified as late and will not be considered in the
current competition.
Applicants are responsible for ensuring that applications are mailed or

hand-delivered or submitted electronically well in advance of the
application due date and time.
Mail
28
Applications that are submitted by mail must be received no later than
4:30 p.m., eastern time, on the due date referenced above at the
address listed in Section IV.6.
Hand Delivery
Applications hand carried by applicants, applicant couriers, other

representatives of the applicant, or by overnight/express mail couriers
must be received on or before the due date referenced above, between
the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., eastern time, at the address
referenced in Section IV.6., between Monday and Friday (excluding
Federal holidays).
Applications submitted electronically via Grants.gov must be submitted

no later than 4:30 p.m., eastern time, on the due date referenced
above.
ACF cannot accommodate transmission of applications by facsimile or

email.
Late Applications
Applications that do not meet the requirements above are considered

late applications. ACF shall notify each late applicant that its
application will not be considered in the current competition.
ANY APPLICATION RECEIVED AFTER 4:30 P.M., EASTERN TIME,

ON THE DUE DATE WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR
COMPETITION.
Extension of Deadlines
ACF may extend application deadlines when circumstances such as

acts of God (floods, hurricanes, etc.) occur; when there are
widespread disruptions of mail service; or in other rare cases. A
determination to extend or waive deadline requirements rests with the
Chief Grants Management Officer.
Receipt acknowledgement for application packages will not be provided

to applicants who submit their package via mail, courier services, or by
hand delivery. Applicants will receive an electronic acknowledgement
for applications that are submitted via http://www.Grants.gov.
Checklist
29
You may use the checklist below as a guide when preparing your
application package.
Required When to
What to Submit Content Required Form or Format Submit
SF-424 See Section See By

IV.2 http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resou application
rces.html due date.
SF-424A See Section See By

rces.html due date.
SF-424B See Section See By

rces.html due date.
Certification See Section See By date of

Regarding Lobbying IV.2 http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resou award.
rces.html
SF-LLL if applicable See Section See By date of

IV.2 http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resou award.
rces.html
Project See Found in Sections IV.2 and V By

Summary/Abstract Sections application
IV.2 and V due date.
Project Description See Found in Sections IV.2 and V By

Sections application
Budget and Budget See Found in Sections IV.2 and V By

Justification Sections application
Non-Federal See Section Found in Section IV With

Resources IV application
Third-Party See Found in Sections IV and V By

Agreements Sections IV application
and V due date.
Indirect Charges See Section Found in Section V By

V application
due date.
Additional Forms
30
What to Required When to

Submit Content Required Form or Format Submit
Survey on See form. See By

Ensuring http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html application
Equal due date.
Opportunity
for
Applicants
4. Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs:
State Single Point of Contact (SPOC)
This program is covered under Executive Order (Exec. Order) 12372,

"Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs," and 45 CFR Part
100, "Intergovernmental Review of Department of Health and Human
Services Programs and Activities." Under the Exec. Order, States may
design their own processes for reviewing and commenting on proposed
Federal assistance under covered programs.
As of August 1, 2006, the following jurisdictions have elected to

participate in the Exec. Order process: Arkansas, California, Delaware,
District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine,
Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire,
New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Utah,
West Virginia, Wisconsin, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana
Islands, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands. As these jurisdictions
have elected to participate in the Executive Order process, they have
established SPOCs. Applicants from participating jurisdictions should
contact their SPOC, as soon as possible, to alert them of prospective
applications and receive instructions. Applicants must submit all
required materials, if any, to the SPOC and indicate the date of this
submittal (or the date of contact if no submittal is required) on the
Standard Form 424, item 16a.
Under 45 CFR 100.8(a)(2), a SPOC has 60 days from the application

deadline to comment on proposed new or competing continuation
awards. SPOCs are encouraged to eliminate the submission of routine
endorsements as official recommendations. Additionally, SPOCs are
requested to clearly differentiate between mere advisory comments
31
and those official State process recommendations, which may trigger
the "accommodate or explain" rule.
Comments submitted directly to ACF should be addressed to the U.S.

Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children
and Families, Office of Grants Management, Division of Discretionary
Grants, 370 L'Enfant Promenade SW., 6th Floor, Washington, DC
20447.
Although the remaining jurisdictions have chosen not to participate in

this process, entities that meet the eligibility requirements of the
Program Announcement are still eligible to apply for a grant even if a
State, Territory, or Commonwealth, etc., does not have a
SPOC. Therefore, applicants from these jurisdictions, or for projects
administered by Federally-recognized Indian Tribes, need take no
action in regard to Exec. Order 12372.
The official list, including addresses, of the jurisdictions that have

elected to participate in Exec. Order 12372 can be found on the
following URL: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/spoc.html.
5. Funding Restrictions:
Fundraising is not an allowable cost under this program.
Grant awards will not allow reimbursement of pre-award costs.
Construction and purchase of real property are not allowable activities

or expenditures under this grant award.
6. Other Submission Requirements:
Please see Sections IV.2 and IV.3 for deadline information and other
application requirements.
Submit applications to one of the following addresses:
Submission by Mail

118 Q St., NE.
Hand Delivery

32
118 Q St., NE.
Please see Section IV.2 for guidelines and requirements when

submitting applications electronically via http://www.Grants.gov.
V. APPLICATION REVIEW INFORMATION
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (P.L. 104-13)
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to

average 40 hours per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed and reviewing
the collection information.
ACF currently has a pending request for OMB approval of the

information collection requirements included in this program
announcement and we anticipate approval of that request. However,
given the importance of the work covered by this program
announcement and the need to ensure that available FY2007 funds
appropriated for such work are awarded before the end of this fiscal
year, we have chosen to issue this announcement while our request
with OMB is pending.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required

to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. (This information collection is currently
under OMB review for extension of the expiration date. According to
OMB policy, the approval will not expire while the collection is under its
review.).
1. Criteria:
Part I THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION OVERVIEW
PURPOSE
The project description provides the majority of information by which

an application is evaluated and ranked in competition with other
applications for available assistance. The project description should be
concise and complete. It should address the activity for which Federal
funds are being requested. Supporting documents should be included
33
where they can present information clearly and succinctly. In
preparing the project description, information that is responsive to
each of the requested evaluation criteria must be provided. Awarding
offices use this and other information in making their funding
recommendations. It is important, therefore, that this information be
included in the application in a manner that is clear and complete.
GENERAL EXPECTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
ACF is particularly interested in specific project descriptions that focus

on outcomes and convey strategies for achieving intended
performance. Project descriptions are evaluated on the basis of
substance and measurable outcomes, not length. Extensive exhibits
are not required. Cross-referencing should be used rather than
repetition. Supporting information concerning activities that will not be
directly funded by the grant or information that does not directly
pertain to an integral part of the grant-funded activity should be
placed in an appendix.
Pages should be numbered and a table of contents should be included

for easy reference.
Part II GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING A FULL PROJECT

DESCRIPTION
INTRODUCTION
Applicants that are required to submit a full project description shall

prepare the project description statement in accordance with the
following instructions while being aware of the specified evaluation
criteria. The text options give a broad overview of what the project
description should include while the evaluation criteria identify the
measures that will be used to evaluate applications.
PROJECT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT
Provide a summary of the project description (one page or less) with

reference to the funding request.
OBJECTIVES AND NEED FOR ASSISTANCE
Clearly identify the physical, economic, social, financial, institutional,

and/or other problem(s) requiring a solution. The need for assistance
must be demonstrated and the principal and subordinate objectives of
the project must be clearly stated; supporting documentation, such as
letters of support and testimonials from concerned interests other than
the applicant, may be included. Any relevant data based on planning
34
studies should be included or referred to in the endnotes/footnotes.
Incorporate demographic data and participant/beneficiary information,
as needed. In developing the project description, the applicant may
volunteer or be requested to provide information on the total range of
projects currently being conducted and supported (or to be initiated),
some of which may be outside the scope of the program
announcement.
APPROACH
Outline a plan of action that describes the scope and detail of how the
proposed work will be accomplished. Account for all functions or
activities identified in the application. Cite factors that might accelerate
or decelerate the work and state your reason for taking the proposed
approach rather than others. Describe any unusual features of the
project such as design or technological innovations, reductions in cost
or time, or extraordinary social and community involvement.
Provide quantitative monthly or quarterly projections of the

accomplishments to be achieved for each function or activity in such
terms as the number of people to be served and the number of
activities accomplished.
When accomplishments cannot be quantified by activity or function,

list them in chronological order to show the schedule of
accomplishments and their target dates.
If any data is to be collected, maintained, and/or disseminated,

clearance may be required from the OMB. This clearance pertains to
any "collection of information that is conducted or sponsored by ACF."
Provide a list of organizations, cooperating entities, consultants, or

other key individuals who will work on the project along with a short
description of the nature of their effort or contribution.
EVALUATION
Provide a narrative addressing how the conduct of the project and the
results of the project will be evaluated. In addressing the evaluation
of results, state how you will determine the extent to which the project
has achieved its stated objectives and the extent to which the
accomplishment of objectives can be attributed to the project. Discuss
the criteria to be used to evaluate results, and explain the
methodology that will be used to determine if the needs identified and
discussed are being met and if the project results and benefits are
being achieved. With respect to the conduct of the project, define the
procedures to be employed to determine whether the project is being
35
conducted in a manner consistent with the work plan presented and
discuss the impact of the project's various activities that address the
project's effectiveness.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The following are requests for additional information that must be

included in the application:
ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILES
Provide information on the applicant organization(s) and
cooperating partners, such as: organizational charts; financial
statements; audit reports or statements from Certified Public
Accountants/Licensed Public Accountants; Employer
Identification Number(s); contact persons and telephone
numbers; names of bond carriers; child care licenses and other
documentation of professional accreditation; information on
compliance with Federal/State/local government standards;
documentation of experience in the program area; and, other
pertinent information.
If the applicant is a non-profit organization, it should submit

proof of its non-profit status in its application. The non-profit
agency can accomplish this by providing any one of the
following: a) a reference to the applicant organization's listing in
the IRS's most recent list of tax-exempt organizations described
in the IRS Code; b) a copy of a currently valid IRS tax exemption
certificate; c) a statement from a State taxing body, State
attorney general, or other appropriate State official certifying
that the applicant organization has a non-profit status and that
none of the net earnings accrues to any private shareholders or
individuals; d) a certified copy of the organization's certificate of
incorporation or similar document that clearly establishes non-
profit status; or e) any of the items immediately above for a
State or national parent organization and a statement signed by
the parent organization that the applicant organization is a local
non-profit affiliate.
THIRD-PARTY AGREEMENTS
Provide written and signed agreements between grantees and
subgrantees, or subcontractors, or other cooperating entities.
These agreements must detail the scope of work to be
performed, work schedules, remuneration, and other terms and
conditions that structure or define the relationship.
BUDGET AND BUDGET JUSTIFICATION
36
Provide a budget with line-item detail and detailed calculations for
each budget object class identified on the Budget Information Form
(SF-424A or SF-424C). Detailed calculations must include estimation
methods, quantities, unit costs, and other similar quantitative detail
sufficient for the calculation to be duplicated. If matching is a
requirement, include a breakout by the funding sources identified in
Block 15 of the SF-424.
Provide a narrative budget justification that describes how the

categorical costs are derived. Discuss the necessity, reasonableness,
and allocation of the proposed costs.
GENERAL
Use the following guidelines for preparing the budget and budget
justification. Both Federal and non-Federal resources (when
required) shall be detailed and justified in the budget and budget
narrative justification. "Federal resources" refers only to the
ACF grant funds for which you are applying. "Non-Federal
resources" are all other non-ACF Federal and non-Federal
resources. It is suggested that budget amounts and
computations be presented in a columnar format: first column,
object class categories; second column, Federal budget; next
column(s), non-Federal budget(s); and last column, total
budget. The budget justification should be in a narrative form.
PERSONNEL
Description: Costs of employee salaries and wages.
Justification: Identify the project director or principal

investigator, if known at the time of application. For each staff
person, provide: the title; time commitment to the project in
months; time commitment to the project as a percentage or full-
time equivalent; annual salary; grant salary; wage rates;
etc. Do not include the costs of consultants, personnel costs of
delegate agencies, or of specific project(s) and/or businesses to
be financed by the applicant.
FRINGE BENEFITS
Description: Costs of employee fringe benefits unless treated as
part of an approved indirect cost rate.
Justification: Provide a breakdown of the amounts and

percentages that comprise fringe benefit costs such as health
insurance, FICA, retirement insurance, taxes, etc.
TRAVEL
37
Description: Costs of project-related travel by employees of the
applicant organization. (This item does not include costs of
consultant travel).
Justification: For each trip show: the total number of

traveler(s); travel destination; duration of trip; per diem;
mileage allowances, if privately owned vehicles will be used; and
other transportation costs and subsistence allowances. Travel
costs for key staff to attend ACF-sponsored workshops should be
detailed in the budget.
EQUIPMENT
Description: "Equipment" means an article of nonexpendable,
tangible personal property having a useful life of more than one
year and an acquisition cost that equals or exceeds the lesser
of: (a) the capitalization level established by the organization
for the financial statement purposes, or (b) $5,000. (Note:
Acquisition cost means the net invoice unit price of an item of
equipment, including the cost of any modifications, attachments,
accessories, or auxiliary apparatus necessary to make it usable
for the purpose for which it is acquired. Ancillary charges, such
as taxes, duty, protective in-transit insurance, freight, and
installation, shall be included in or excluded from acquisition cost
in accordance with the organization's regular written accounting
practices.)
Justification: For each type of equipment requested provide: a

description of the equipment; the cost per unit; the number of
units; the total cost; and a plan for use on the project; as well as
use and/or disposal of the equipment after the project ends. An
applicant organization that uses its own definition for equipment
should provide a copy of its policy, or section of its policy, that
includes the equipment definition.
SUPPLIES
Description: Costs of all tangible personal property other than
that included under the Equipment category.
Justification: Specify general categories of supplies and their

costs. Show computations and provide other information that
supports the amount requested.
CONTRACTUAL
Description: Costs of all contracts for services and goods except
for those that belong under other categories such as equipment,
supplies, construction, etc. Include third-party evaluation
38
contracts, if applicable, and contracts with secondary recipient
organizations, including delegate agencies and specific project(s)
and/or businesses to be financed by the applicant.
Justification: Demonstrate that all procurement transactions will

be conducted in a manner to provide, to the maximum extent
practical, open and free competition. Recipients and
subrecipients, other than States that are required to use 45 CFR
Part 92 procedures, must justify any anticipated procurement
action that is expected to be awarded without competition and
exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold fixed at 41 USC
403(11), currently set at $100,000.
Recipients might be required to make available to ACF pre-award

review and procurement documents, such as requests for
proposals or invitations for bids, independent cost estimates,
etc.
Note: Whenever the applicant intends to delegate part of the

project to another agency, the applicant must provide a detailed
budget and budget narrative for each delegate agency, by
agency title, along with the required supporting information
referred to in these instructions.
OTHER
Enter the total of all other costs. Such costs, where applicable
and appropriate, may include but are not limited to: insurance;
food; medical and dental costs (noncontractual); professional
services costs; space and equipment rentals; printing and
publication; computer use; training costs, such as tuition and
stipends; staff development costs; and administrative costs.
Justification: Provide computations, a narrative description and

a justification for each cost under this category.
INDIRECT CHARGES
Description: Total amount of indirect costs. This category
should be used only when the applicant currently has an indirect
cost rate approved by the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) or another cognizant Federal agency.
Justification: An applicant that will charge indirect costs to the

grant must enclose a copy of the current rate agreement. If the
applicant organization is in the process of initially developing or
renegotiating a rate, upon notification that an award will be
made, it should immediately develop a tentative indirect cost
39
rate proposal based on its most recently completed fiscal year, in
accordance with the cognizant agency's guidelines for
establishing indirect cost rates, and submit it to the cognizant
agency. Applicants awaiting approval of their indirect cost
proposals may also request indirect costs. When an indirect cost
rate is requested, those costs included in the indirect cost pool
should not be charged as direct costs to the grant. Also, if the
applicant is requesting a rate that is less than what is allowed
under the program, the authorized representative of the
applicant organization must submit a signed acknowledgement
that the applicant is accepting a lower rate than allowed.
PROGRAM INCOME
Description: The estimated amount of income, if any, expected
to be generated from this project.
Justification: Describe the nature, source and anticipated use of

program income in the budget or refer to the pages in the
application that contain this information.
NON-FEDERAL RESOURCES
Description: Amounts of non-Federal resources that will be used
to support the project as identified in Block 15 of the SF-424.
Justification: The firm commitment of these resources must be

documented and submitted with the application so that the
applicant is given credit in the review process. A detailed budget
must be prepared for each funding source.
TOTAL DIRECT CHARGES, TOTAL INDIRECT CHARGES, TOTAL

PROJECT COSTS
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
In considering how applicants will carry out the responsibilities

addressed under this announcement, competing applications for
financial assistance will be reviewed and evaluated against the
following criteria:
OBJECTIVES AND NEED FOR ASSISTANCE - 20 points
In reviewing the objectives and need for assistance, reviewers

will consider the extent to which:
1. The applicant demonstrates an understanding of the goals and

objectives of the relevant legislation, Child and Family Services
Improvement Act (P.L. 109-288), Section 437(f), subpart 2,
40
title IV-B, of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 629(f)(b) and
how the proposed project will contribute to achieving those legislative
goals and objectives, and the goals stated in the purpose and
background sections of this funding opportunity announcement.
2. The applicant provides data to describe the nature of the problem

being targeted and extent of the need for proposed services and
activities in the target population. The applicant provides recent
evidence demonstrating that methamphetamine or other substance
abuse has had a substantial impact on the number of out-of-home
placements for children, or the number of children who are at risk of
being placed in an out-of-home placement, in the partnership region.
The statement of need includes a clearly established baseline for the
project. Documentation for this gap analysis may come from a variety
of qualitative and quantitative sources. Quantitative data may come
from local data or trend analyses, State data (e.g., from State needs
assessments), and/or national data (e.g., from ACF's Adoption and
Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS), National Child
Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS), and Child and Family
Services Review (CFSR) data and SAMHSA's National Household
Survey on Drug Abuse and Health or related sources). For data
sources that are not well known, the applicant provides sufficient
information on how the data were collected so reviewers can assess
the reliability and validity of the data.
The applicant clearly describes the scope of the problem with

methamphetamine and substance abusing parents in their defined
targeted community, its impact on the child welfare system, and their
proposal to address that problem in their defined targeted community.
3. The applicant describes existing activities that coordinate services

for and facilitate a community's response to families with a substance
abuse problem and involved in or at risk for involvement in the child
welfare system. The applicant describes any existing inter-agency
bodies, communication mechanisms, co-location of staff, or other
changes in agency or cross-agency practices and procedures that have
been established to address this need.
4. The applicant describes existing services to family members that

support the goals and objectives of this announcement, such as
number and type of current substance abuse and mental health
treatment services; family and children's treatment, intervention, and
prevention services; drug court services, drug endangered children's
programs, staff training, parent and foster parent training; and any
other service in place to address the needs of families with both a
41
substance abuse problem and involvement in the child welfare system.
The applicant describes the availability of family treatment services in
the geographic area of the regional partnership, as well as the number
and type of current treatment services, slots, or beds available and the
number of people currently being served in the target area. The
applicant states the average wait time for treatment, if any.
5. The applicant demonstrates a thorough understanding of the

characteristics and provides a description of the target population, as
well as the geographic area to be served, and justifies the selection of
both, including the numbers to be served, their demographic
information, and the socioeconomic and cultural factors to be
considered in delivering programs to this population.
6. The applicant clearly states the purpose, goals and objectives of

the proposed project; and describes how achievement of the goals will
produce meaningful and relevant results such as increased access,
availability, and outreach to promote services or activities that
enhance child and family well-being. The project will: (a) enhance the
well-being of children receiving services or taking part in activities
conducted with funds provided under the grant; (b) lead to safety and
permanence for such children; and (c) decrease the number of out-of-
home placements for children, or the number of children who are at
risk of being placed in an out-of home placement, in the partnership
region.
7. Data provided should include the nature and prevalence of

substance use, numbers of children in the child welfare system, status
of collaboration between the child welfare and substance abuse
treatment agencies for the target population in the geographic area
selected, and demonstrate that substance use by parents has had a
substantial impact on numbers of children in out-of-home placement
or at risk for out- of-home placement.
8. The applicant demonstrates that the geographic area of the

regional partnership currently has limited capacity for comprehensive
family treatment services or limited capacity to link families to relevant
treatment services.
BONUS POINTS - 5 points
When considering awarding Bonus Points under this section,

reviewers will consider the extent to which:
1. The applicant has identified and described the impact of

methamphetamine abuse and addiction (alone or in combination with
42
other drug abuse and addiction) on child welfare in the geographic
area and population targeted by the regional partnership.
2. The applicant has proposed grant-funded services and activities

that appropriately address methamphetamine abuse and addiction
(alone or in combination with other drug abuse and addiction) in the
geographic area and population targeted by the regional partnership.
APPROACH - 35 points
In reviewing the approach, reviewers will consider the extent

to which:
1. The applicant demonstrates how the proposed approach will

enable the project to meet the goals and objectives stated. The
applicant demonstrates strong links between proposed grant-funded
activities or services and intended short- and long-term outcomes
described in the conceptual framework provided at the end of this
announcement.
2. The applicant provides a reasonable timeline for implementing the

proposed project. The timeline (chart or graph) shows key activities,
milestones, target dates and responsible staff. Timelines include
phase-in activities that will be implemented no later than three months
(90 days) after award. Phase-in activities may include milestones such
as hiring and training staff, cross-training the network of service
providers, and admissions of first clients.
The applicant describes the factors that could speed or hinder project
implementation and explains how these factors would be managed.
3. The applicant provides a detailed description of the selected

services to be provided to the target population that are allowable
under this funding announcement.
The applicant provides a detailed description of the joint activities to

be funded in whole or in part with the funds provided under the grant,
including the sequencing of the activities proposed to be conducted
under the funding period for the grant.
The program will bridge gaps or substantially improve the current

service delivery system and benefit the target population.
The applicant provides a detailed description of the strategies for

integrating programs and services determined to be appropriate for
the child and where appropriate, the child's family.
43
4. The applicant's approaches for recruiting and retaining participants
for proposed grant-funded activities or services reflect a good
understanding of the target population and are appropriate given the
allowable activities to be included in the project. These approaches
identify potential barriers that would prevent individuals, families, or
communities from taking advantage of the services offered and include
strategies for overcoming those barriers.
5. The applicant describes how the proposed service or practice will

be implemented, including plans for providing services at residential
treatment sites and those that will be provided in the community.
6. The applicant describes the development of a comprehensive and

individualized array of activities or services tailored to the needs of
targeted individuals, families, or communities. The applicant
demonstrates the extent to which individualized family case plans
include individual, group, and family counseling, follow-up relapse
prevention, and supplemental treatment services for all family
members, as necessary, if offering treatment services. The applicant
demonstrates the extent to which the project plans include a
description of how these activities have been adapted to meet the
unique training or collaboration needs of targeted individuals, families,
or communities, if implementing activities such as training or
establishing collaborative service linkages.
7. The project will be culturally-responsive to the target population.

Proposed grant-funded services and activities accommodate the
linguistic and cultural experience of targeted individuals, families, and
communities. The applicant describes how proposed activities and
services demonstrate sensitivity to other issues of diversity including
gender, age, ethnicity, and special needs of the population served
(e.g., cognitive disabilities, illiteracy)
8. There is a clear and reasonable plan for how to refer individuals to

appropriate services when the nature of their service needs (e.g., job
training, housing, transportation) is beyond the scope of this grant.
9. The proposed services will involve the collaboration of appropriate

partners for maximizing the effectiveness of service delivery. The
applicant describes the process to be used to achieve service
coordination and integration among the network of providers.
The applicant provides a detailed description of the strategies for

collaborating with: (a) the State child welfare agency that is
responsible for the administration of the State plan under Title IV-B or
Title IV-E of the Social Security Act (unless that agency is the lead
44
applicant for the regional partnership); (b) the State agency
responsible for administering the substance abuse prevention and
treatment block grant provided under subpart II of part B of title XIX
of the Public Health Service Act as appropriate; and (c) the State law
enforcement and judicial agencies as appropriate. If the lead applicant
is an Indian Tribe or Tribal consortia, they do not need to include the
State Child Welfare agency.
There are letters of commitment or memoranda of understanding from

regional partners and other organizations, agencies, and consultants
that will be partners or collaborators in the proposed project. These
documents describe the role of the agency, organization, or consultant
and detail specific tasks to be performed.
10. The design of the proposed project is evidence-based, reflects up-

to-date knowledge from the research and literature on known effective
practices, and builds on current theory, research, evaluation data and
best practices. The applicant describes the evidence base for the
proposed services or practices. The applicant justifies any adaptations
or modifications to an evidence-based practice if such changes are
necessary to meet the needs of the target population.
The project will contribute to increased knowledge or understanding of

the problems and issues addressed by this funding announcement.
11. The applicant describes a sound plan for continuing this project
beyond the period of Federal funding. The plan for sustainability
includes a discussion of plans to leverage other available funds to
continue services and activities.
The applicant describes how program continuity will be maintained

when there is a change in the operational environment (e.g., staff
turnover, change in project leadership) to ensure stability over time.
EVALUATION - 15 points
In reviewing the evaluation, reviewers will consider the extent

to which:
1. The applicant has selected a set of performance indicators from

those provided in the List of Proposed Performance Indicators section
of this funding announcement, provides justification for the indicators
selected, and relates them to the goals identified in the conceptual
framework provided at the end of this announcement.
45
The applicant demonstrates the capacity to collect and report on the
selected performance indicators and specifies and justifies any
additional measures planned for use with this project.
2. The applicant proposes a clear and convincing plan for evaluating

the project and satisfies the requirements for the evaluation published
in this funding announcement. The plan includes data collection,
management, analysis, interpretation and reporting.
3. The methods of evaluation are feasible, comprehensive, and

appropriate to the goals, objectives, and context of the project and
show how the evaluation will be integrated with requirements for
collection and reporting of performance indicator data required by this
funding announcement.
The evaluation plan is strongly guided by the applicant's logic model

and by the conceptual framework provided at the end of this funding
announcement.
The methods of evaluation include process and outcome analyses for

assessing the effectiveness of program strategies and the
implementation process.
The proposed evaluation will assess the regional impact of grant-

funded services and activities on child and family well-being.
The applicant describes the methods to be used to determine the

extent to which the project has achieved its stated objectives and the
extent to which the accomplishment of objectives can be attributed to
the project; discusses the criteria used to evaluate results and how the
performance indicators selected will be incorporated into the
evaluation; and defines the monitoring procedures used to determine
whether the project is being carried out in a manner consistent with
the work plan presented.
4. The applicant proposes a sound plan for collecting high-quality data

on the services or activities provided, including the total costs, cost
effectiveness, and outcomes of these services or activities. This plan
should include data collection, management, analysis, interpretation
and reporting.
The applicant's evaluation plan includes an appropriate comparison

group for determining the influence of the project activities on
outcomes. If a comparison group is not proposed, the applicant
provides a reasonable explanation for not using a comparison group
and offers another, equally rigorous approach to evaluating the
influence of the strategy/intervention on outcomes.
46
The comparison group and the program/treatment group are assigned
at random or matched on key characteristics. If not assigned at
random or matched on key characteristics, the applicant provides a
reasonable explanation of how it will identify and address pre-existing
differences between the comparison group and treatment group.
5. There is a sound plan for securing informed consent and

implementing an IRB review, if applicable.
6. The applicant either demonstrates that they have the in-house

capacity to conduct an objective, comprehensive evaluation of the
project (including collecting and analyzing the performance indicator
data), or presents a sound plan for contracting with a third-party
evaluator specializing in social science or evaluation, or a university or
college, to conduct the evaluation.
7. The proposed evaluator has sufficient experience with research

and/or evaluation, understands the population of interest, and
demonstrates the necessary independence from the project to assure
objectivity.
8. The applicant provides an appropriate, feasible, and realistic plan

for using evaluation findings to produce ongoing documentation of
project activities and results.
The evaluation plan includes performance feedback and periodic

assessment of program progress that can be used to modify the
program, as necessary, and serve as a basis for program adjustments.
9. The applicant thoroughly addresses the following points related to

performance indicators:
In order to meet the statutory requirement for developing performance

indicators while also allowing adequate time for applicants to develop
their proposals, ACF in coordination with SAMHSA has developed a
conceptual framework (included at the end of this announcement) and
a preliminary set of performance indicators for review. Both the
indicators and the conceptual framework were based on a thorough
review of preexisting child welfare and substance abuse treatment
performance measures, previous child welfare and substance
treatment demonstration projects, and other discussions between the
fields of substance abuse treatment and child welfare pertaining to the
collection and analysis of relevant data. Applicants are to:
(1) Review both the list of indicators provided and the conceptual
framework included at the end of this announcement;
47
(2) Select indicators relevant to their proposed grant-funded activities
or services from the four categories of outcomes (child/youth, adult,
family/relationship, and regional partnership/service capacity);
(3) Demonstrate the appropriateness of each selected indicator in

measuring performance of proposed grant-funded activities or
services, including commenting on the regional partnership's capacity
to track such indicators (i.e., describing data sources or data collection
methods such as administrative data, surveys); and, if applicable,
(4) Suggest revisions to the proposed indicators or propose additional

indicators that may be appropriate to measure other selected grant-
funded activities or services.
In order to describe their capacity to monitor selected performance

indicators, applicants may chose to provide information on current
data collection systems and instrumentation, as well as qualitative
data or narrative information related to performance measurement
and program evaluation. The selection and description of appropriate
indicators will serve as the initial consultation between ACF and
potential grantees on the development of the required performance
indicators. Regional partnerships that are awarded grants provided
under this announcement will work with the Children's Bureau to refine
and finalize the development of performance indicators used to
evaluate grant-funded services and activities. Finally, all grant
recipients will be required to incorporate information related to
selected performance indicators into their first annual report, and
subsequent progress reports (see Reporting Requirements under
Section VI, Award Administration Information). Timely submission of
all semiannual and annual reports is required.
List of Proposed Performance Indicators
Select and comment on those performance indicators from the

following list that would best measure the achievement of child, adult,
family, and regional partnership/service capacity outcomes of
proposed grant-funded services or activities. Applicants will be
evaluated, in part, on their selection of appropriate indicators, their
ability to demonstrate the indicators' relevance to their program and
their demonstration of their program's capacity to report on the
selected indicators.
Child/Youth Outcomes
1. Children identified as at risk of removal from the home due to a

parent or caretaker's substance abuse problem that are able to remain
48
in the custody of a parent or caretaker during substance abuse
treatment: Of all such in-home children associated with a
"substantiated" or "indicated" finding of maltreatment that placed a
child at risk of removal, what percentage remained with a parent or
caretaker through treatment completion?
2. Recurrence of child maltreatment in families with an identified

substance-abusing parent or caretaker: Of all such children associated
with a "substantiated" or "indicated" finding of maltreatment, what
percentage had another "substantiated" or "indicated" finding of
maltreatment within six months?
3. Average length of stay in foster care of children removed from the

home due to the substance abuse problems of a parent or caretaker:
Of all such children discharged from foster care, what was the average
length of stay (in days) from the date of the most recent entry into
foster care until the date of discharge?
4. Re-entries to foster care of children removed from the home due

to the substance abuse problems of a parent or caretaker: Of all such
children discharged from foster care to reunification, what percentage
re-entered foster care in less than 12 months?
5. Timeliness of reunification of children removed from the home due

to the substance abuse problems of a parent or caretaker: Of all such
children discharged from foster care to reunification, what percentage
was reunified in less than 12 months from the date of the most recent
entry into foster care?
6. Timeliness of adoption or guardianship of children removed from

the home due to the substance abuse problems of a parent or
caretaker: Of all such children discharged from foster care to a
finalized adoption or legal guardianship, what percentage was
discharged in less than 24 months from the date of the most recent
entry into foster care?
7. Prevention of subsequent births of substance-exposed newborns:

What proportion of mothers identified as having a substance abuse
problem had a subsequent birth of a substance-exposed newborn
during the grant period?
8. Children connected to supportive or treatment services: Of those

children identified as at risk of removal from the home due to a
parent's or caretaker's substance abuse problem, how many were
assessed for their individual needs? Of those assessed, what
percentage was connected to appropriate services to address the
49
needs highlighted in the assessment? Of such children, what
percentage received referrals and intakes for developmental services,
mental health or counseling, early intervention and prevention
services, or crisis intervention services as a result of a child welfare
investigation?
Adult Outcomes
1. Access, timeliness, and appropriateness of substance abuse

treatment for parents of families involved with the child welfare
system: Of all such parents or caretakers with a substance abuse
problem identified during a child welfare investigation, what
percentage received an alcohol and drug screening at first intake? Of
all such parents or caretakers, what was the average time between
identification of a possible substance use disorder and a follow-up
assessment? Of all such parents or caretakers, what was the average
time between identification of a substance use disorder and first
receipt of substance abuse services? Of such parents referred to
substance abuse treatment, what percentage participated in
comprehensive family substance abuse treatment?
2. Parents retained in substance abuse treatment: Of all families

referred to substance abuse treatment as a result of a child welfare
investigation, what percentage and how many remained in the
treatment program until completion? What was the average length of
stay in treatment for these referred families?
3. Length of abstinence: Of all such parents or caretakers in

substance abuse treatment, what percentage and how many maintain
abstinence for three, six, or nine months after entering treatment? Of
all such parents or caretakers in substance abuse treatment, what
percentage and how many maintain abstinence for three, six, or nine
months after completing treatment? Of all such families from which
children have been removed, what percentage maintains abstinence
for three, six, or nine months following reunification of children after
completion of the treatment program?
(Note: Applicants are invited to comment on the feasibility of tracking

parental abstinence or sobriety for the various proposed lengths of
time and the events to which the tracking of this outcome is tied, e.g.,
treatment completion, reunification of children)
4. Parents connected to supportive services in response to assessed

needs: Of all parents referred to substance abuse treatment as a
result of a child welfare investigation, what percent received services
for their assessed needs before completion of treatment?
50
5. Parents participating in continuing care and recovery support
services: Of those parents for whom a child welfare investigation
identified a substance abuse problem that subsequently completed a
substance abuse treatment program, what percentage and how many
received aftercare services to support abstinence? Of such parents or
caretakers receiving aftercare services, what percentage received
continuing care such as relapse prevention, recovery coaching, self-
help support groups, spiritual support, and/or housing assistance? Of
such parents or caretakers, what percentage was visited by a child
welfare caseworker or other professional offering supportive services
at least once a month?
Family/Relationship Outcomes
1. Parental capacity to provide for children's needs: Of those parents

or caretakers with a substance abuse problem identified by a child
welfare investigation, how many were connected to services that
enhanced the parent's or caretaker's ability to provide for their family's
well-being? Of such parents or caretakers, what percentage is
employed full time? Of such parents or caretakers, what percentage is
enrolled in educational or vocational training? What percentage of such
families was screened for the existence of domestic violence? What
percentage of such families received a domestic violence assessment
and treatment referral?
2. Decrease in risk factors associated with reasons for service and

increase in protective factors to prevent child maltreatment: Of those
families with both an identified substance abuse problem and a child
welfare investigation, what percentage demonstrated a reduction in
risk factors or an increase in child maltreatment protective factors?
Risk factors may include:
• Criminal behaviors such as manufacturing or selling of drugs; or

• Mental health issues such as parental depression, child behaviors
problems.
Protective factors may include:
• Bonding and attachment;

• Parental resilience;
• Social connections; or
• Concrete support in times of need or crisis.
51
3. Appropriateness of substance abuse treatment for families
involved with the child welfare system: Of the target population, what
percentage of families involved with substance abuse treatment and
the child welfare system was connected with services related to the
needs identified in the case plan? Of such parents or caretakers, what
percentage was actively involved in case planning?
4. Families receiving appropriate, coordinated case management

services: Of those families with both an identified substance abuse
problem and a child welfare investigation, what percentage of children
and families report active involvement in various aspects of the case
planning process, including identifying strengths, needs, and needed
services, and establishing and evaluating progress toward goals? Of
such families, what percentage received joint case management
services coordinated between a substance abuse treatment provider
and a child welfare agency (i.e., a single case plan coordinated across
systems)? What percentage of such cases received a cross-agency
assessment conference every 90 days or less?
5. Foster care parents and other substitute caretakers receiving

substance abuse training: Among homes where children have been
placed in foster care due to a parent's or caretaker's substance abuse,
what percentage of such children's foster parents or substitute
caretakers received education and training about addiction, substance
abuse treatment, special needs of children who have suffered from
maltreatment and whose parents have a substance use disorder, and
about family recovery issues?
Regional Partnership/Service Capacity Outcomes
1. Regions have a new or increased ability to address

parental/caretaker substance abuse and its affect on children: What
percentage of employees and caseworkers across agencies report an
increased understanding of services and policies of their partners?
What percentage of workers report an increased knowledge of the
cross-agency referral process, and what percentage report making
appropriate referrals due to this increased knowledge? Among
member agencies in the regional partnership, has the number of
cross-agency or cross-partner trainings increased? What percentage of
caseworkers reported an increase in coordinated case management
and planning across agencies?
2. Regions have a new or increased ability to serve families with both

an identified substance abuse problem and a child welfare
investigation: Of the agencies participating in the regional
partnership, what percentage has increased the number of appropriate
52
treatment programs for the targeted region? Among such agencies,
what was the increase in the number or percentage of families served
or the number or percentage of treatment slots available in the
targeted region?
3. Collaboration between regional partners: As a result of the

agencies participating in grant-funded activities or services, how many
have developed or enhanced memoranda of understanding regarding
treatment coordination? What percentage of funding for these
programs can be described as blended? What other collaborative
activities (e.g., co-location of workers, data-sharing systems)
demonstrate enhanced collaborative efforts of substance abuse
treatment providers and child welfare agencies?
ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILES - 20 points
In reviewing the organizational profiles, reviewers will

consider the extent to which:
1. The applicant is the lead agency in a regional partnership

composed of at least two of the organizations/entities listed in the
Eligibility Information section of this funding announcement.
The regional partnership includes either the State child welfare agency
that is responsible for the administration of the State plan under title
IV-B or title IV-E of the Social Security Act OR an Indian Tribe or Tribal
consortium.
The regional partnership includes at least one non-State entity if the

lead applicant is one of the three State agencies described in the
Eligibility Information section of this announcement.
The regional partnership includes at least one non-Tribal entity if the

lead applicant is a Tribal entity as described in the Eligibility
Information section of this funding announcement.
The members of the regional partnership and any other partnering

organizations collectively have sufficient relevant experience and
expertise with development or replication, implementation,
management, and evaluation of similar projects and capability and
experience working with the target population and meeting the needs
identified through the gap analysis.
The applicant, its regional partners, and other partner organizations

demonstrate capability and experience with similar projects and
populations, have linkages to the target population, and ties to
53
grassroots/community-based organizations that are rooted in the
culture of the target population.
The applicant includes letters of commitment and/or memoranda of

understanding from regional partners and other partnering
organizations that state the agreed upon roles, responsibilities, and
time commitments. Agreements demonstrate that the financial
relationships of the partners will ensure proper stewardship of Federal
funds.
2. Each participating organization possesses the organizational

capability to fulfill its assigned roles and functions effectively.
Each direct service provider organization has at least two years

experience (as of the due date of the application) providing services in
the geographic area(s) covered by the application and to the same or
similar target populations.
The applicant has provided a list of staff who will participate in the
project, showing the role of each and their responsibilities, time
commitment, and qualifications demonstrating appropriateness to the
successful implementation of the proposed program.
The applicant has described the cultural characteristics of key staff and
indicated if any are members of the target population or community.
The applicant provides a staffing pattern that includes bilingual and
bicultural individuals to align with the cultural and linguistic
characteristics of the target population.
The applicant's proposed project director and key project staff

demonstrate sufficient relevant knowledge, experience and capabilities
(as demonstrated in a resume, curriculum vitae or related document)
to institute and manage a project of this size, scope, and complexity
effectively.
The applicant includes a biographical sketch for the project director

and other key positions. The applicant includes a position description
and/or a letter of commitment with a current biographical sketch of
these individuals if they have not yet been hired.
3. There is a sound management plan for achieving the objectives of

the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks and ensuring quality.
The plan clearly defines the role and responsibilities of the lead agency
and its regional partners.
54
The plan clearly describes the effective management and coordination
of activities carried out by the Regional partners and any other
partners, subcontractors, and consultants if applicable.
4. There is a mutually beneficial relationship between the proposed

project and other work planned, anticipated, or underway with Federal
assistance by the applicant.
5. The applicant has demonstrated the availability of resources for

the proposed project (e.g., facilities, equipment), and provided
evidence that services will be provided in a location that is adequate,
accessible, compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),
and amenable to the target population.
BUDGET AND BUDGET JUSTIFICATION - 10 points
In reviewing the budget and budget justification, reviewers will

consider the extent to which:
1. The budget presentation is clear and detailed. The budget

narrative clearly explains and justifies the budget information
presented on SF-424 and SF-424A.
The applicant has provided complete project budgets for each year of
grant funding requested (either three-year or five-year grant period).
The costs of the proposed project are reasonable, thoroughly justified,

and appropriate in view of the activities to be conducted and expected
results and benefits.
The applicant's budgets demonstrate a clear understanding of the

decreasing Federal funding levels over the life of the project and the
increasing match levels required.
The applicant provides clear and detailed information on the sources

from which the project match will be provided for each year of the
project. The budget narrative clearly explains how and what sources
will be used to meet the match requirement.
The budget describes the procedures for documenting program income

to ensure that it is added to the Federal funds committed to the
project and used to further the objectives of the project.
The applicant has allocated an adequate portion of the total grant

award to satisfactorily collect and evaluate the data necessary for
monitoring selected performance indicators and to conduct a local
evaluation of proposed grant-funded activities and services.
55
2. The applicant's fiscal controls and accounting procedures would
ensure prudent use, proper and timely disbursement, and accurate
accounting of funds received under this program announcement.
2. Review and Selection Process:
No grant award will be made under this announcement on the basis of

an incomplete application.
Each application will be screened to determine whether it was received

by the closing date and time (Section IV.3.) and whether the
requested amount exceeds the ceiling or upper range value, whichever
is appropriate (Section II.)
Each application will be screened to determine whether it was received

by the closing date and time (Section IV.3) and whether the requested
amount exceeds the ceiling or upper range value, whichever is
appropriate (Section II)
A panel of at least three reviewers (primarily experts from outside the

Federal Government) will use the evaluation criteria described in this
announcement to evaluate each application. The reviewers will
determine the strengths and weaknesses of each application, provide
comments about the strengths and weaknesses, and give each
application a numerical score.
The results of the competitive review are a primary factor in making

funding decisions. In addition, Federal staff conducts administrative
reviews of the applications and, in light of the results of the
competitive review, will recommend applications for funding to the
ACYF Commissioner. ACYF reserves the option of discussing
applications with other funding sources when this is in the best interest
of the Federal Government. ACYF may also solicit and consider
comments from ACF Regional Office staff in making funding decisions.
ACYF may take into consideration the involvement (financial and/or
programmatic) of the private sector, national, or State or community
foundations; a favorable balance between Federal and non-Federal
funds for the proposed project; or the potential for high benefit from
low Federal investment. ACYF may elect not to fund any applicants
having known management, fiscal, reporting, programmatic, or other
problems that make it unlikely that they would be able to provide
effective services or effectively complete the proposed activity.
With the results of the peer review and the information from Federal
staff, the Commissioner of ACYF makes the final funding decisions. The
Commissioner may give special consideration to applications proposing
56
services of special interest to the Federal Government and to achieve
geographic distributions of grant awards. Applications of special
interest may include, but are not limited to, applications focusing on
underserved or inadequately served clients, service areas and
programs addressing diverse ethnic populations, or activities and
services that address the problem of methamphetamine use in the
child welfare system.
Since ACF will be using non-Federal reviewers in the process,

applicants have the option of omitting from the application copies (not
the original), specific salary rates or amounts for individuals specified
in the application budget and Social Security Numbers if otherwise
required for individuals. The copies may include summary salary
information.
Available Funds. Applicants should note that grants to be awarded

under this program announcement are subject to the availability of
funds.
Please reference Section IV.2 for information on non-Federal reviewers

in the review process.
Approved but Unfunded Applications
Applications that are approved but unfunded may be held over for
funding in the next funding cycle, pending the availability of funds, for
a period not to exceed one year.
3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates:
Applications will be reviewed no later than Summer 2007. Grant

awards will have a start date no later than October 1, 2007.
VI. AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
1. Award Notices:
The successful applicants will be notified through the issuance of a

Financial Assistance Award document, which sets forth the amount of
funds granted, the terms and conditions of the grant, the effective
date of the grant, the budget period for which initial support will be
given, the non-Federal share to be provided (if applicable), and the
total project period for which support is contemplated. The Financial
Assistance Award will be signed by the Grants Officer and transmitted
via postal mail.
57
Following the finalization of funding decisions, organizations whose
applications will not be funded will be notified by letter, signed by the
Program Office head.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements:
Grantees are subject to the requirements in 45 CFR Part 74 (non-

governmental) or 45 CFR Part 92 (governmental).
Direct Federal grants, sub-award funds, or contracts under this ACF

program shall not be used to support inherently religious activities
such as religious instruction, worship, or proselytization. Therefore,
organizations must take steps to separate, in time or location, their
inherently religious activities from the services funded under this
program. Regulations pertaining to the Equal Treatment for Faith-
Based Organizations, which includes the prohibition against Federal
funding of inherently religious activities, can be found at the HHS web
site at: http://www.hhs.gov/fbci/waisgate21.pdf.
A faith-based organization receiving HHS funds retains its

independence from Federal, State, and local governments, and may
continue to carry out its mission, including the definition, practice, and
expression of its religious beliefs. For example, a faith-based
organization may use space in its facilities to provide secular programs
or services funded with Federal funds without removing religious art,
icons, scriptures, or other religious symbols. In addition, a faith-based
organization that receives Federal funds retains its authority over its
internal governance, and it may retain religious terms in its
organization's name, select its board members on a religious basis,
and include religious references in its organization's mission
statements and other governing documents in accordance with all
program requirements, statutes, and other applicable requirements
governing the conduct of HHS funded activities.
Faith-based and community organizations may reference the

"Guidance to Faith-Based and Community Organizations on Partnering
with the Federal Government" at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/fbci/guidance/index.html.
HHS Grants Policy Statement
The HHS Grants Policy Statement (GPS) is the Department of Health

and Human Services new single policy guide for discretionary grants
and cooperative agreements. Unlike previous HHS policy documents,
the GPS is intended to be shared with and used by grantees. It
became effective October 1, 2006 and is applicable to all Operating
58
Divisions (OPDIVS), such as the Administration for Children and
Families (ACF), except the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The GPS
covers basic grants processes, standard terms and conditions and
points of contact as well as important OPDIV-specific requirements.
Appendices include a glossary of terms and a list of standard
abbreviations for ease of reference. The GPS may be accessed at
3. Reporting Requirements:
Grantees will be required to submit program progress and financial

reports (SF-269 found at:
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants_resources.html) throughout the
project period. Program progress and financial reports are due 30 days
after the reporting period. Final programmatic and financial reports are
due 90 days after the close of the project period.
Final reports may be submitted in hard copy to the Grants

Management Office Contact listed in Section VII of this announcement.
Program Progress Reports: Semi-Annually

Financial Reports: Semi-Annually
VII. AGENCY CONTACTS
Program Office Contact:
Catherine Nolan
Children's Bureau
Portals Office Building, 8th Floor
1250 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20024
Phone: (202) 260-5140
Email: catherine.nolan@acf.hhs.gov
Grants Management Office Contact:
Daphne Weeden, Grants Management Officer

118 Q St., NE
Phone: 866-796-1591
Email: cb@dixongroup.com
59
VIII. OTHER INFORMATION
Additional information about this program and its purpose can be

located at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/.
For general information regarding this announcement please contact:

118 Q St., NE.
Phone: 866-796-1591
Date: 05/03/2007 Joan E. Ohl

Commissioner
Administration on Children, Youth and Families
Conceptual Framework (pdf - 52kb)
60

Program Office: Administration On Children, Youth and Families, Funding Opportunity Title

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Program Office: Administration On Children, Youth and Families, Funding Opportunity Title

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Department of Health & Human Services

Administration for Children and Families

Program Office: Administration on Children, Youth and Families,

Funding Targeted Grants to Increase the Well-Being of,

CFDA Number: 93.087

Due Date for 07/03/2007

The Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Children's Bureau,

I. FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION

The Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program (section 437(f),

Funding Opportunity Description

States and communities around the country are struggling to address

Parental substance abuse is also a key factor underlying the abuse or

An important challenge facing both the child welfare and substance

While substance abuse treatment is often effective in assisting clients

1. Recruitment, engagement and retention of parents or

2. Differences in professional perspectives and policies

3. Chronic service shortages in both the child welfare and

In recent years, HHS has undertaken a number of projects and

One outgrowth of the Blending Perspectives report was the creation of

HHS has supported other approaches to identifying and addressing

Finally, applicants may review a variety of print and electronic

ACF seeks to promote the development of strategies to improve

Applicants may choose to test a broad-based approach to substance

Examples of services and activities that applicants might propose to

1. Systems Collaboration and Improvements

• Support for inter-agency and inter-organization collaboration to

3. Services for Children and Youth

• Drug Endangered Children (DEC) programs to respond to the

4. Substance Abuse Treatment Services

• Timely access to comprehensive substance abuse treatment to

5. Other Services for Parents

• Parenting skills training (as part of substance abuse treatment or

Since applicants are required to demonstrate the target region's lack

The Evaluation portion of the Evaluation Criteria section of this

The acceptance of funds for projects responsive to this announcement

1. Have the project fully functioning within 90 days following the

Description of Funding Arrangements

The legislation outlines a number of specific requirements for funds

In proposing a grant program budget, applicants are encouraged to

Applicants are required to select ONE of the following Program

Program Option 1: $1,000,000 annual award for 3 years (declining);

Program Option 2: $1,000,000 annual award for 5 years (declining);

Program Option 3: $500,000 annual award for 3 years (fixed); or

Program Option 4: $500,000 annual award for 5 years (fixed).

Applicants must state for which of these four program options

Applicants should include in their proposal a program budget for each

Pre-Application Conference. The Children's Bureau will be

The purpose of the conference is to assist applicants to develop

A recording and transcript of the applicant conference will be posted at

Information pertaining to this pre-application conference can be found

II. AWARD INFORMATION

Program Option 1. $1,000,000 annual award for 3 years

Funding Instrument Type: Grant

Anticipated Total Priority Area $20,600,000

Anticipated Number of Awards: 1 to 8

Ceiling on Amount of Individual $2,575,000

Average Projected Award Amount: $2,575,000 per project period

Length of Project Periods: 36-month project period with three

2007 85% 1,000,000 15% 176,000 1,176,000

2008 85% 825,000 15% 146,000 971,000

2009 80% 750,000 20% 188,000 938,000

Program Option 2. $1,000,000 annual award for 5 years

Anticipated Total Program Option $18,710,000