Sie sind auf Seite 1von 48

MBDCI

Geomechanics and Waste Management


Achieving Zero Liquid
and Solid Discharge
4-F Waste Management

Maurice Dusseault
MBDCI

Permanent Disposal Options

Geological Disposal of Solid Wastes

permanent
warehousing ocean dumping
landfills, old or
quarries new mines

Slurry
Fracture salt
Injection caverns
4-F Waste Management

not to scale

Remember: disposal means disposal; treatment often means


new waste streams are generated, but have to be disposed
MBDCI

Permanent Waste Disposal


 Wastes are: tank bottoms, sand, etc. etc.
 Thermal desorption, incinerating
 Chemical/washing treatment and land-filling
 Slurry injection (Cuttings re-injection - CRI)
 Deep placement in porous strata
 Suitable for solid particulate wastes as well
4-F Waste Management

 Geological disposal gives permanent isolation

 Some other options for Zero Discharge


 Saltcavern disposal for solids
 Recycling mud and wastes
MBDCI

Emulsions Oily Sand

Tank Bottoms Pit Slops


4-F Waste Management

4 of 18
MBDCI

Advantages of Deep Disposal


 Eliminates landfills & groundwater problems
 Uses many levels of natural barriers
 Low permeability seals (shales, mudstones)
 Slow, horizontal flow regimes exist at depth

 Natural clays absorb cations, organics

 The technology already exists (oil industry)


4-F Waste Management

 No long-term maintenance is needed


 Environmental liability becomes zero
 Two methods: solids injection or salt cavern
placement (salt is not everywhere present)
MBDCI

4-F Waste Management View of an Injection System


MBDCI

Produced Water Disposal


 Geomechanics becomes an issue if:
 large+p leads to , causing shear, etc.
 T is large, leading to cooling effects

 Cooling effect is a thermoelastic stress effect


 Cool H2O injection: thermoelastic shrinkage
 drops in the cooled zone until it is below pinj

 Radial hydraulic fractures propagate out, following


4-F Waste Management

the cooling front


 The well becomes a much better injection well
because of the increasing well radius effect
 Better cements are important as well (seals)
MBDCI

Cuttings Reinjection
 Ground, slurried cuttings injected through an
annulus, usually in shales (mainly offshore)
 Occurs at fracture pressure (pinj > hmin)
 Because of low shale permeability, pressures
can remain high, two problems can occur:
 Casingscan shear if slip occurs (high 1 - 3)
4-F Waste Management

 Subsequent wells can have high p mud blowouts

 These are geomechanics issues, difficult, but


possible to monitor and analyze
MBDCI

Slurried Solids Injection

possible well locations flat or gently inclined strata

surficial deposits
low permeability strata mudstone

300 3000 metres


silty shale
blanket sand in
a thick shale
channel sand in
a silty shale
4-F Waste Management

blanket sand
horizontal flow regimes
limestone
5-30 km

Many areas are suitable for injection not to scale


MBDCI

Minimizing Risk & Liability

 Reservoirs or deep strata can be easily


demonstrated to be remarkably secure
 Solid wastes are permanently entombed by
stress once injection ceases
 Thus, solid wastes cannot flow or migrate
 Leachates are low toxicity & flow laterally
4-F Waste Management

 Shale overburden eliminates vertical leakage


 Surface storage is very risky (they all leak!)
 Injection minimizes risk, at modest cost
MBDCI

Slurried Solids Injection Cycles

pressure
repose sand
5 period inj.
6 5 6
2 4 7 2 4 7
8 8
3 3
9

10
v = 11.4MPa
1 1
4-F Waste Management

24-hr cycle
initial pore pressure = 4.6 MPa

time
MBDCI

Operational Stages

 Begin injection with clear water


 Fracture generation with clear water

 Momentum built up in system with water

 Begin adding solids to clear waste water

 Stable slurry injection, 6-14 hrs.

 Gradually shut off the solids

 Post-flush with clear water


4-F Waste Management

 Stop water injection altogether

 Shut in and get closure pressures

 Obtain long-term p for analysis


MBDCI

Stress Changes Reorientation

2

2

3

3
4-F Waste Management

Initial Injection Subsequent Injection Fracture Re-orientation


MBDCI

One Days Injection Record

Daily Pressure vs. Time


Injection Bottom Hole Pressure (psi)

(Injection period: 4-12hrs/day)


3000

2000 end injection shut-in period

1000
4-F Waste Management

start injection
time

5:00 7:00 9:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 19:00 21:00 23:00

13-Sep-97
MBDCI

Reorientation During Injection


N
Strike orientation of
Horizontal uplift vertical fractures
caused by water June 10 June 12
fluffing up formation June 13
30 - 50% of uplift volume June 14 A

W E
4-F Waste Management

June 15 A
Project TTI 4
(Saskatchewan,
June 14 B
Canada)
S
MBDCI

In Situ Solids Placement

 Early time slurried solids


injection operations Day 3
 Wastes fractures into the Day 1
formation
 Solids deposits causes
slight increase in local
Day 2
formation stresses
4-F Waste Management

Well
 Changes in local stresses
cause re-orientation of
each new fracture
(fracture rotation)
MBDCI

Waste Pod Development

 Later time slurried


Waste pod
solids injection
development
operations from past cycles Todays
 Cumulative impact of ( compressibility, fracture
solids placement and perm)
fracture rotation is to
create a waste pod.
Waste pod has
4-F Waste Management

different mechanical
Well
& flow characteristics
(stiffer, lower Virgin formation
permeability) ( compressibility, perm)
MBDCI

Waste Pod Growth

Longer fractures:
- access more formation
- waste pod extension
Virgin Formation Well
4-F Waste Management

Short fracture:
- contained in waste pod
- waste pod packing
MBDCI

4-F Waste Management Waste Pod Development


MBDCI

Waste Pod Growth

m
100 - 600
Fmn. Thickness (20 - 60 m)

Overlying Shale
4-F Waste Management

Underlying Shale
Waste pod created by
previous fracturing Current fracture
MBDCI

Waste Pod Growth

Overlying Shale Waste Pod


4-F Waste Management

Underlying Shale
Water leakoff into
sand formation
MBDCI

The 3-D Shape of the Zone

1 = 2 = v

Process Here, 3 = hmin, & the other two


zone shape
= 1
principal stresses are about
2
equal. Also, the injectate density
3 3 is assumed to be the same as
3/z, so there is no tendency to
4-F Waste Management

= 1 climb. (In reality, induced


2 fractures almost always climb.)

v
MBDCI

In Situ Mechanisms

 Slurry forced in at fracturing pressures


 High k causes rapid pressure bleed-off
 Solids injection changes stress state:
 Lateralstress (h) rises
 Vertical stress (v) is constant

 Mixed horizontal and vertical fracturing


4-F Waste Management

 Fractures change direction, shape, length

 Pressures decay, overburden stress is re-


imposed on solids, compaction occurs
MBDCI

Injection of Solids into Shale


Low-permeability shale or
silty shale Characteristics:
Low leak-off, high fluid
efficiency
Least principal stress hmin = 3

Long, narrow fractures


generated
Little to no filtration of solids
Slow closure and pressure
decay
4-F Waste Management

Fracture orientation changes


develop slowly
Horizontal components
Slow injection rate Fractures rise because fluid
< 0.5 m3/min density < d3/dz
MBDCI

Injection into Sand


Silt to sand, k=
50-5000 mD
Characteristics:
Medium to high leak-off,
medium fluid efficiency (40-90%)
Least principal stress hmin = 3

Shorter, wider fractures


generated
Solids filtration: fracture wall
permeability drops
Rapid fracture closure and
pressure decay
4-F Waste Management

Fracture orientation changes


with strains
Horizontal components develop
Injection rate of 0.5 to 3 Rise is blunted by fluid leak-off
m3/min
MBDCI

Control Parameters for Injection

Methods to avoid reservoir impairment


 Surry injection rate can be varied

 The slurry composition (oil%...)can be varied

 Slurry density can be varied (brines used)

 Injection period length and volume of

solids/liquids input can be changed


4-F Waste Management

 Relaxation period between episodes can be

changed to allow p and V dissipation


 The proper reservoir selection is important
MBDCI

Well Completion & Security

conventional high security

potable water
sources

surface casing security casing


sand blunting zone
impermeable,
ductile shale
injection casing
4-F Waste Management

injection
perforated zone
stratum
not to scale

Depending on the liquid and solid wastes and the nature of the
strata and potable water zone, higher levels of well security can
be chosen, more risk reduction measures taken.
MBDCI

Well and Strata Choice


Computer

Surface Casing
Surface sediments
(Contain freshwater) Production Casing

Cable Injection Tubing


Shale

Uniform Cement
Sand Sheath

CONFINING ZONE Non-contracting,


ductile cement.
(Shale)
4-F Waste Management

CONTAINMENT Bottomhole sensor


ZONE (Sands & Shales) Packer

TARGET ZONE
Perforations
(Sand)
Underlying Shale
MBDCI

Injection Behavior

Late Time Behavior


20000 4.0
3 3 3 3
Slurry: 416 m Slurry: 505 m Slurry: 498 m Slurry: 740 m
Sand: 45 m3 Sand: 80 m3 Sand: 85 m3 Sand: 113 m3
Bottomhole Pressure (kPa)

15000 3.0

Slurry Rate (m /min)


Project TTI_3
(Norcen 1997)

3
10000 2.0
4-F Waste Management

5000 1.0
BHP
Slurry Rate
0 0.0
Jul 14 0:00 Jul 15 0:00 Jul 16 0:00 Jul 17 0:00 Jul 18 0:00 Jul 19 0:00
MBDCI

Superb Pressure Decay Response

4000

3500
(psi)

3000
Injection Bottom H ole Pressure

2500

2000

1500
4-F Waste Management

1000

500

0
9/14/97 12:00 9/15/97 12:00 9/16/97 12:00 9 /17/97 12:00 9/18/97 12:00 9/19/97 12:00 9/20/97 12:00 9/21/97 12:00
Date
MBDCI

Why a High-k Site?


 Usually high porosity (sandstones > 25% ),
therefore good storativity
 Flow is usually horizontal in high k zone
 High site means high compressibility
 High k means that we will not permanently
pressurize a large reservoir volume
4-F Waste Management

 Bleed off almost immediate, no long-distance


fracture propagation, waste localized near well
 Much better than injection into a shale!
MBDCI

Conditions for Siting

 Deep, well below potable water sources


 In horizontal strata of great lateral extent
 Stratum must be sufficiently thick & porous
 Permeability must meet certain standards
 Thick ductile overlying shales are desirable
4-F Waste Management

 At least one overlying permeable bed


 Formation water briny, flowing horizontally
 No exploitable resources to be impaired
MBDCI

Ideal Injection Lithostratigraphy

possible well locations


flat or gently inclined strata

Shale barriers to
upward flow

Permeable zones to

3000-10,000
blunt upward migration

Zones with good


4-F Waste Management

storage

High k zones

No reserves

5-30 km
not to scale
MBDCI

4-F Waste Management Solid Waste Injection Site - Duri


MBDCI

4-F Waste Management Tank Bottom Sludges

50% H2O
30% oil
20% minerals
MBDCI

4-F Waste Management Oily Sand Wastes


MBDCI

Typical Surface Uplift

~symmetric
10 cm uplift max slope ~1:5,000

no uplift at
1.5 km distance
4-F Waste Management

700 m deep

waste site, 100-150 m


radius maximum V ~ 16,000 m3
MBDCI

Well Capacity for Solids


 Proper formation choice is required
 To date, the maximum injected in a single well
is 30,000 m3 sand
 Water dissipates into the sediments
 50,000 to 100,000 m3 of sand (not including
the waste water carrier liquid) is quite feasible
4-F Waste Management

for a well
 Target stratum tracking during injection allows
continuous re-evaluation of capacity
MBDCI

CPI Duri Operations Waste Injection

E
F
D
G
B C B
H

A A
J
4-F Waste Management
MBDCI

Step-Rate Test, Injection Well

bottom-hole pressure (psi) bottom-hole pressure (psi)


1200 1200
stop injection
1100
1100 1080 psi
1000

1000 decay
900 data
Step rate test Injection
800 cycle
900
4-F Waste Management

700 begin
800 injection rate (m3/min) injection
600
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 24 hours
MBDCI

How Cuttings Are Injected


 Injection is through the annulus between an
exterior and interior casing
 The cuttings are generally ground up to a
fine powder and slurries, sometimes even
with viscosifying agents
 Invariably, ground cuttings are injected at
4-F Waste Management

the shoe into low-k shales


 This is not an optimum approach
MBDCI

Cuttings Injection

injection into deeper casing


annulus shallow casing

fracture
fracture
planeplane

casing shoe
4-F Waste Management

cement
injection of ground
cuttings generally
occurs in shale shale
4-F Waste Management Cutting Injection Options

Courtesy MI-SWACO Ltd.


MBDCI
MBDCI

Cutting Re-Injection Problems


 Grinding offshore = a $ 1-2 million system
 Shales are low permeability, extremely slow
bleed-off, strata pressures remain high
 Low bleed-off means vertical fractures
climb substantially, fracture extent is large
 Environmental containment is problematic
4-F Waste Management

 Mud blowouts have occurred (BP/Amoco)


 Several reported losses of casing (excessive
distortion develops in injected zone)
MBDCI

Best Method for Cuttings, Mud


 Consider using a dedicated slurry injection
well, placed away from other well casings
 The well can be slim-hole, economical
 Or, if you have an available abandonment
 Choose a permeable stratum, high bleed-off
 Dont pulverize shale, just grind it to -5 mm
4-F Waste Management

 Dilute slurry with waste water, do not add


any other thickening or viscosifying agents
 Carry out injection properly, monitor
carefully
MBDCI

Potential Problems
 Well blockages could occur
 Formation could become blocked
 Pressure bleed-off behavior may deteriorate
 Containment could be impaired
 Well casings could shear off (several cases)
 Fortunately, it appears that properly
executed SF can avoid these problems
4-F Waste Management

 This requires continuous monitoring and


analysis of p and V data, proactive
MBDCI

Stress Changes in Solids Injection

Well liquid leakage to higher


region of reduced lateral stress
zones may occur

**regions of largest
shear stress change

+V
(+ p)
4-F Waste Management

**Large stress changes may lead to casing expansion from


shear if uncontrolled injection allowed slurry injection
MBDCI

Waste Disposal
 Slurried Solids Injection is a geomechanics
dominated process
 For cuttings injection
 For other slurried wastes

 For emulsions, waste water, other wastes

 The technology is wide-spread offshore


4-F Waste Management

 Increasing onshore
 Proper geology
 Proper geomechanics
 ZERO DISCHARGE is a feasible goal!

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen