IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CASE NO. Sc 103/2016 BETWEEN AND. ‘Aworney-General Respondent DATED 14 October 2016 AFFIDAVIT/NOTICE OF DISCLAIMER 10 ‘The Regisua, Supreme Court, 85 Lambton Quay, WellingtonAFFIDAVIT/NOTICE OF DISCLAIMER ‘TAKE NOTICE that I, Friedrich Joachim Fehling of Haihari, herewith affirm that have never initiated any court case (incl appeal, pplication) withthe Attorney- General as defendant/sespondent, and that I have never been, nor am I, party to any stich court ease (ial. appeal, pplication)! Ieappears that judge O'Regan incompetently and delusionally created an appeal/ application misusing abusing my name as its applicant (sce attached copy of his ‘mute dated 3/10/16), which I herewith denounce. oki, South Westland, this 12° October 2016 (Pie Fetling) Aflamed at Hokika, this 12° October 2016 before me: BE pheIN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND sc 1082016 BETWEEN FRIEDRICH JOACHIM FEHLING Asplient AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL, Respondent counsel Applicant in person (Ci Lange and H F MeKeazi for Respondent Due of Minute: 3 Oetober2016 MINUTE OF O'REGAN 1) The Court will need to determine as preliminary matter whether bas wsiction to deal with this appliestion for eave to appeal. The applicant has ied cevtnsve material with the pplication fr leave ding with the nguments he Wishes to make in the event that the Court hse juedcton to conser his pplication, However, he may wish to make submissions on the question of Juisieton and ihe wises todos, these shouldbe filed an served on or before 21 October 2016 [2] The respondent should then file and serve sbistons destin with both Jusiton and nthe event hat theres jrtition, the merit ofthe applistion within 15 working days afer the date on which the app and server, inthe event that no futher submissions are filed snd served, by 15 November 2016. ri’ submissions are Hed B] Leet te Registrar to provide «copy ofthe material ied by the applicant (© both the Ciown Solio at Christchurch andthe Crown Law Office. The Court should be advised who will be conducting this mater on behalf ofthe Crown #0 that future documents canbe copied to the counsel conducting the proceeding. oF pl[4] The application refers to the respondent as the Crown, using various names to desrie it. The Cour file should refer to te respondent asthe Attorney-General and documents ied in elation to the apliaton from now on should also dos. Satcors igtond Donel & Ca, Cheha fr Response