Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Dylan Haertl
Examine a variety of contemporary theoretical, critical Andr Derain, 1906, Charing Cross
Bridge, London, National Gallery of Art,
and methodological approaches used to view and Washington, DC.
understand visual images thereby, deepening our
understanding of Rothko's and Kandinskys work and Fauvism valued individual expression that
directed experience of his subjects, his emotional
their significance to visual images and culture.
response to nature though the color and form of
the artists work
Mark Rothko: A Retrospective
Art to me is an anecdote of the spirit, and the only means of making concrete the
purpose of its varied quickness and stillness.
- Mark Rothko
Mark Rothko, was an American painter of Russian Jewish descent. Rothko became
an artist in a rather particular moment in history as the outbreak of World War II
circumed the worlds attention. He become virtually unknown as a painter, leading
his financial situation to become exceedingly difficult. Despite these adversities,
Rothko went through a sensational evolution by discovering a new found way to
express his ideas and favor a style of mythological imagery that dominated his work.
This unattachment to typical styles of painting led him to stray off and kindled an
unfamiliar design.
Although Rothko himself refused to stick to any specific art movement, his artwork
Mark Rothko Portrait. Retrieved
follows a distinct pattern of being completely abstract. He was mostly interested in
January 20, 2017
expressing human emotions in his art work such as tragedy and doom.
Art Style and Techniques Rothkos interest in luminosity compelled him to paint
frequently in watercolor. Through the mid-1940s he was
able to produce remarkable pieces of work using a palette of
grays and earth tones.These impactful colors would later be
used in a powerful series of works that he accomplished in
the last years of his life.
- Wassily Kandinsky
One difference between my personal work and Wassily Black and Violet, 1923 by Wassily Kandinsky
Kandinskys is that I used extremely obscure shapes to work out My piece includes area of
facial structure and depth to create, and to easily be able tell the thick regions of a single color
features of the lion. In contrast, Kandinsky sticks to using more that would either compliment
geometrically identifiable configurations to abstractly create surround colors, or
images. Another apparent contrast is the use of material to make purposefully not to create
diversity and shadowing.
the piece. Kandinsky used paint which coated the canvas thicker
Kandinskys painting has a
whereas I used fine colors pencil and a liquid blender to negate the sense of flow where all colors
pencil strokes as much as possible. Kandinsky adheres to using are in line and enforce each
earth toned colors while I use a variety of colors to not have an other.
identifiable color theme.
Art Style and Techniques: Personal v. Mark Rothko
The rectangles within Rothkos
painting do not extend to the
edges of the canvas. To add to
this sensation, there is the effect
of chromatic afterimage.
Looking at each colored
segment individually alters the
perception of those contiguous
to it. On the other hand, my
piece seem to extend off the
allotted size, leaving the views Mark Rothko Saffron, 1957
with a sense of discomfort and
fascination. Also, all the colors
in the piece work together to Again, there is the contrast is the use of material. Rothko creates the
create the images of the lion sense of depth and field with a lighter, highlighted background using
and need to be coordinated to bright colors. This was a more difficult talk for me because I had to use
accomplish such a task. This is solid colors (no blending process) to achieve similar effects. However,
unlike Rothkos piece because the meaning behind each piece is quite similar since they are both
the shapes can represent a new intent to define human emotions and nature.
idea.
Color: Personal v. Wassily
Kandinsky v. mark Rothko
Both my work and Rothkos contain a lot
of reds and yellows. There were intense
colors that contrasted deeper cold colors
in each piece.
Kandinsky and I both share the use of
cool colors like blues, blacks and greens
that impact thought and deeper
compassion.
I decided to use a wide assortment of
colors the better illustrate the human
condition not being 2-dimensional and is
full of wonder and imagination.
There is a black darkness that is present
in all three pieces. It follows the theme of
potential failure or emotions of sorrow or Saffron, 1957 by Mark Rothko,
Retrieved January 18, 2017 (top left
depression. and Blue Painting (Blues Bild), 1924
All three artists exploits strong image, by Wassily Kandinsky, Retrieved
memories, and feelings towards the January 18, 2017 (bottom left)
connection of color and form.
Blue Painting (Blues Bild),
1924 by Wassily Kandinsky,
Retrieved January 18, 2017
There is more movement seen within my work and Kandinsky with color flow and rhythmic influence. Rothko works
around and manipulates color to emphasize emotional context.
The portraits express their ideas through the ability to blend expressionism and abstract concepts to interpret
thoughts and feelings hidden within the image.