Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Challenge Culture
Teachers plan Teachers use the
outcomes levels of S&C
Teachers use S&C
thinking and
backwards from activities in their
objectives in their
students' Maximum class and homework
planning and
Potential Grade delivery
1
Vocabulary)
The model of S&C thinking is visible (e.g. wall displays, progress planners, students
books) and modelled across the school so that students and parents can understand
and can use it
Menu of Blooms
Taxonomy objectives/
2
3. Teachers use S&C activities in their class and homework
The 5 S&C activities below are built into planning across the curriculum
The 5 S&C activities are modelled and taught to students across the curriculum
The 5 S&C activities are assessed with effective feedback given to allow students to
make progress
Students track their progress in the 5 S&C activities in their progress planner
For templates on researching and note taking, look in the Literacy Section. Ideas on thinking
skills can be found in the 7 Strategies to Develop S&C Thinkers power point
The Academic Word List can be found below and there are more ideas on S&C literacy in the
Literacy Section.
3
Synthesising
Evaluating
Can you think of a better way to...?
How successful was...?
What would you have done if...?
How would you rate...?
How would you tackle this next time?
What do you think of...?
How would you change/adapt to make a
new...?
What makes ... good/bad/average?
Given the choice, what would you do...?
For more ideas on S&C questioning see 7 Strategies to Develop S&C questioning power point
and the sections on Socratic Questions and Questions for Critical Thinking below
6.Teachers create a S&C climate
At school, year-team, department and teacher level there are shared strategies in
place to develop the following:
Learning
is valued
Creative
solutions
& Learners
intellectu are
al confident
initiative
Focus on
A 'have a
go processes
not just
culture'
outcomes
For more ideas see the 7 Strategies range of power points and the Learning Contract
Research has identified an Academic Word List (AWL), which relates to words needed by
students to access and understand academic texts. It comprises 570 word families that are
not in the most frequent 2,000 words of English but which occur reasonably frequently. When
added to the common core, this provides access to approximately 90% of texts.
4
These words are commonly used in the language of the classroom, and often as
command words in questions, but often pass learners by. How can we be sure that
all learners will know what we mean by the use of formal language unless we are
explicit in our teaching of it?
This list contains the headwords of the families in the academic word list. The numbers
indicate the sub list of the academic word list, with Sub list 1 containing the most frequently
occurring words and Sub list 10 the least frequent.
5
energy 5 implicit 8 intrinsic 10 military 9 parallel 4 pursue 5
6
role 1 simulate 7 submit 7 task 3 transform 6 version 5
7
Socratic Questions
Socrates was one of the greatest educators who taught by asking questions and thus
drawing out answers from his pupils. ('Ex duco', means to 'lead out', which is the root of
'education').
Here are the six types of questions that Socrates asked his pupils:
Get them to think more about what exactly they are asking or thinking about. Prove the
concepts behind their argument. Use basic 'tell me more' questions that get them to go
deeper.
2. Probing assumptions
Probing their assumptions makes them think about the presuppositions and
unquestioned beliefs on which they are founding their argument. This is shaking the
bedrock and should get them really going!
When they give a rationale for their arguments, dig into that reasoning rather than
assuming it is a given. People often use un-thought-through or weakly-understood
supports for their arguments.
8
Can you give me an example of that?
What do you think causes ... ?
What is the nature of this?
Are these reasons good enough?
Would it stand up in court?
How might it be refuted?
How can I be sure of what you are saying?
Why is ... happening?
Why? (keep asking it -- you'll never get past a few times)
What evidence is there to support what you are saying?
On what authority are you basing your argument?
Most arguments are given from a particular position. So attack the position. Show that
there are other, equally valid, viewpoints.
The argument that they give may have logical implications that can be forecast. Do
these make sense? Are they desirable?
9
And you can also get reflexive about the whole thing, turning the question in on itself.
Use their attack against themselves. Bounce the ball back into their court, etc.
10
Breadth
Significance
Fairness
Logic
Do we need to look at this from another perspective?
Do we need to consider another point of view?
Do we need to look at this in other ways?
Does all this make sense together?
Does your first paragraph fit in with your last?
Does what you say follow from the evidence?
Is this the most important problem to consider?
Is this the central idea to focus on?
Which of these facts are most important?
Do I have any vested interest in this issue?
Am I sympathetically representing the viewpoints of
others?
11