Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

Available online at www.sciencedirect.

com

Procedia CIRP 6 (2013) 261 266

Seventeenth International Symposium on Electromachining

The machining characteristics of polycrystalline diamond (PCD) by


micro-WEDM
F. C. Hsua,b, T. Y. Taib, V. N. Vob, S. Y. Chenb, Y. H. Chena
a
Micro/Meso Mechanical Manufacturing R&D Department,
Metal Industries Research & Development Centre (MIRDC), Kaohsiung, Taiwan
b
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology (STUST), Tainan, Taiwan
* Corresponding author. Tel:+886-7-3513121 Ext.3537; Fax:+886-7-3533307.E-mail address: fchsu@mail.mirdc.org.tw.

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental investigation of the machining characteristics of Polycrystalline Diamond (PCD) in micro wire
electrical discharge machining (-WEDM). The Taguchi method was adopted to obtain the optimum conditions of parameter
settings for cutting width and material removal rate (MRR). The ANOVA analysis has been used to predict the significant
machining parameters according to L18 orthogonal array and signal/noise (S/N) ratio. The experimental results reveal that the
intensity of open circuit voltage (UHP) affects significantly on the amount of cutting width as well as MRR. Additionally, the
cutting width is also directly reduced by higher wire tension and lower flushing pressure. The MRR was increased at greater UHP
and peak current (I). Finally, the confirmation experiments show that the cutting width and MRR also depends on the grain size of
PCD (1.6m ~7m) by the optimum machining conditions.


2013
2013The
TheAuthors.
Authors.Published byby
Published Elsevier B.V.
Elsevier B.V.Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Professor Bert Lauwers
Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Professor Bert Lauwers
Keywords: -WEDM, Polycrystalline diamond (PCD), Material removal rate (MRR), Cutting width, Taguchi method.

excellent material on components subjected to high


1. Introduction stress loads. The great wear resistance of PCD is due to
its extreme hardness and high transverse rupture strength
Here introduce the paper, and put a nomenclature if an unusual combination for ultra-hard materials.
necessary, in a box with the same font size as the rest of However, because of these very properties it is difficult
the paper. The paragraphs continue from here and are to machine this material economically using
only separated by headings, subheadings, images and conventional techniques such as grinding and lapping.
formulae. The section headings are arranged by For this reason, shortly after its introduction, industry
numbers, bold and 10 pt. Here follows further began to search for alternative methods for machining
instructions for authors. PCD blanks.
Polycrystalline diamond (PCD) is a synthetic Since PCD unlike single crystal diamond, is
composite cutting tool material produced by sintering generally sufficiently electrically conductive to enable
together carefully selected diamond particles under wire EDM methods to be used, this technique, which can
condition of high temperature and high pressure. The be applied virtually irrespective of the hardness and
interstitial spaces in the diamond matrix are strength of the material, has offered a solution to the
predominantly filled with cobalt, which is used as a problem of how to machine PCD. Today, electrical
solvent catalyst in the synthesis process. Because of its discharge machining with a wire electrode (Wire EDM)
mechanical properties typical of diamond, PCD is an and electrical discharge grinding (rotary EDM) are

2212-8271 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Professor Bert Lauwers
doi:10.1016/j.procir.2013.03.078
262 F. C. Hsu et al. / Procedia CIRP 6 (2013) 261 266

widely used to machine PCD. In addition, with EDM the flushing pressure, grain size, wire speed, peak current,
kerf is very narrow, thus minimizing waste and open circuit voltage, servo voltage, pulse on duration
increasing economic efficiency [1]. Ahmet and Ulas [2] and wire tension on material removal rate and cutting
have reported an experimental investigation of the width of PCD in the fine grades 1.7 m, 4 m and 6 m,
machining characteristics of AISI D5 tool steel in respectively, used in manufacturing cutting tools by
WEDM process to determine parameters such as open micro-WEDM process.
circuit voltage, pulse duration, wire speed and dielectric
fluid pressure were changed to explore their effect on the 2. Experiments
surface roughness and metallurgical structure.
Saurav Datta et al. [3] performed an experimental 2.1. Plan of Investigation
study to determine the variation of the machining
parameters on the material removal rate (MRR), gap The design of experiment is a well-organized method
width and surface roughness. In their work, the where the values of the design factors can be varied to
experiments have conducted with six process study the effects of the individual factors as well as their
parameters: discharge current, pulse duration, pulse interaction on the responses with a least number of
frequency, wire speed, wire tension and dielectric flow experimental runs. The parameter settings are changed
rate; to be varied in three different levels. Data related to within a specific range to obtain an optimum
the process responses such as MRR, roughness value of combination for desired result of the responses. In the
the worked surface and kerf have been measured for present study, eight process parameters are selected
each of the experimental runs; which correspond to namely, flushing pressure p(bar), PCD grain size (m),
randomly chosen different combinations of factor wire speed (AW), peak current (I), open circuit voltage
setting. (UHP), servo voltage (Ssoll), pulse on duration (TON)
There is a large volume of published studies and wire tension (FW), Each factor has three equally
describing the effect of WEDM machining parameters spaced levels. The factors and their levels considered in
on cutting width and MRR [4-7]. However, for the the present study are shown in Table 1. As it is a eight-
micro-WEDM, there is rare published work studying the factor three-level experiment, so the total degree of
effect of machining parameters on PCD statistically. The freedom (DOF) considering the individual factors and
variation of kerf and MRR with machining parameters their interactions is 15. The L18 orthogonal array is
and optimization of machining settings for minimum employed as it satisfies all the DOF conditions. The
kerf and maximum MRR should be investigated orthogonal array is shown in Table 3.
experimentally and the obtained results should be Taguchis parametric design is an effective tool for
interpreted and modeled statistically to understand robust design. It offers a simple and systematic
closely the behavior of machining rate and accuracy in qualitative optimal design at a relatively low cost. It has
micro-WEDM. been widely used for the last two decades. The greatest
This paper seeks to explain the basic relationships in advantage of this approach is to save the experimental
the micro-WEDM cutting of PCD between the time as well as the cost by finding out the significant
parameter settings and the PCD properties but also to factors. One of the important steps involved in Taguchis
determine effect of machining parameters namely, technique is selection of an orthogonal array (OA). An
Table 1
Machining settings used in the experiments
Factor levels
Factor Description Symbol
1 2 3
p (bar) The flushing pressure for driving the wire and renew A 0.6 2.5 --
flushing debris.
Grain size (m) The average size (or grain size) of the crystals that make B 1.7 4 6
sintered diamond compact tool blanks.
Wire speed(Aw) The rate at which wire moves through the guides. C 60 75 90
Peak current (I) The discharge current is set in relation to the technology D 1 2 3
chosen and workpiece height.
Open circuit No-load voltage is determined in relation to the workpiece E 2 3 4
voltage (UHP) material and wire used
Servo voltage Value preset for the servo is the reference parameter F 20 30 40
(Ssoll) determining the optimum feed rate during erosion.
Ton Pulse on duration G 14 19 24
Wire tension Fw Controlling and stabilizing the wire tension during cutting H 0.5 0.8 1.1
(N) to ensure highly accurate performance
F. C. Hsu et al. / Procedia CIRP 6 (2013) 261 266 263

OA is a small set from all possibilities which helps to 1


determine least no. of experiments. To obtain optimum LB = 10log ( y12 + y22 ) (1)
n
process parameters setting, Taguchi proposed a
statistical measure of performance called signal to noise
ratio(S/N ratio). This ratio considers both the mean and The-higher-the-better
the variability. In addition to S/N ratio, ANOVA is used
to indicate the influence of process parameters on 1 1 1
performance measures. Taguchi recommends the use of
HB = 10 log ( 2
+ 2 ) (2)
n y1 y 2
the loss function to measure the quality characteristic.
The value of the loss function is further transformed into
a statistical measure called signal-to-noise ratio; where The S/N ratio ij for the ith performance characteristic in
signal means desirable value (mean) and the noise is the the jth experiment given as
undesirable value (S.D.). A larger S/N ratio represents a ij = 10 log Lij (3)
better quality characteristic because of the minimization where is the observed data and is the number of
of noise, and the corresponding process parameters are observations.
insensitive to the variation of environmental conditions Table 2
and other noise factors. The variability can be easily Non-variable parameters in this experiment
captured if S/N ratio is used to convert the experimental Parameter Value
results into a value for the evaluation characteristic. in Depth of cut (mm) 0.45
the optimum parameter analysis, instead of the mean. Machining length (mm) 0.3
The idea is to maximize the S/N ratio, thereby Wire diameter (mm) 0.03
minimizing the effect of random noise factors, which Discharged power (code) 20
have a significant impact on the process performance.
There are several S/N ratios available depending on
type of characteristics; lower is better (LB), nominal is 2.2. Materials, test conditions and measurement
best (NB) and higher is better (HB).In WEDM, the
smaller cutting width and the higher MRR are the The experimental studies were performed on the
indication of better performance. Therefore, the LB Agiecut Vertex 1F wire cutting system with wire
for the cutting width and HB for the MRR were diameters down to 20 m manufactured by +GF+
selected for obtaining optimum machining performance AgieCharmilles SA, Switzerland. The wire used in the
characteristics. For HB and LB, the definitions of the experiments was a 0.03mm diameter Tungsten wire
loss function (L) for machining performance results yi of (TWS-30) produced by the Sumiden Fine Conductors,
n repeated number are [8]: Co., ltd. Japan, mechanically pre-stressed at a tensile
The-lower-the-better force of 1N in order to achieve high manufacturing
accuracy.

Table 3
Experimental design using L18 orthogonal array
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H)
Factor
p(bar) Grain AW I UHP Ssoll Ton Fw
No.1 0.6 1.7 60 1 2 20 14 0.5
No.2 0.6 1.7 75 2 3 30 19 0.8
No.3 0.6 1.7 90 3 4 40 24 1.1
No.4 0.6 4 60 1 3 30 24 1.1
No.5 0.6 4 75 2 4 40 14 0.5
No.6 0.6 4 90 3 2 20 19 0.8
No.7 0.6 6 60 2 2 40 19 1.1
No.8 0.6 6 75 3 3 20 24 0.5
No.9 0.6 6 90 1 4 30 14 0.8
No.10 2.5 1.7 60 3 4 30 19 0.5
No.11 2.5 1.7 75 1 2 40 24 0.8
No.12 2.5 1.7 90 2 3 20 14 1.1
No.13 2.5 4 60 2 4 20 24 0.8
No.14 2.5 4 75 3 2 30 14 1.1
No.15 2.5 4 90 1 3 40 19 0.5
No.16 2.5 6 60 3 3 40 14 0.8
No.17 2.5 6 75 1 4 20 19 1.1
No.18 2.5 6 90 2 2 30 24 0.5
264 F. C. Hsu et al. / Procedia CIRP 6 (2013) 261 266

The objective of electrical discharge cutting is to Table 4


produce the required contour on the workpiece. For S/N ratio values for cutting width
reasons of economics, the technique of multi-stage
cutting is generally applied for this purpose. In a first cut values for Mean by factor level (dB)
the full cut the contour is machined into the Cutting width Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
workpiece at the highest possible cutting speed, followed (A)p(bar) 257.07* 252.53 --
by one or more subsequent cuts (trimming cuts) at (B)Grain size 168.67 169.89 171.04*
reduced discharge energy in order to minimize gradually (C)Aw 169.73 170.14* 169.73
the surface roughness and damage to the boundary zone. (D)I 170.47* 169.85 169.28
With the subsequent cuts only a small proportion of the (E)UHP 172.49* 170.61 166.49
diameter of the wire is engaged, and the discharge (F)Ssoll 170.90* 169.62 169.08
energy is reduced compared with the preceding (G)Ton 169.97 169.48 170.15*
machining step. The change in tool path required for this (H)Fw 167.65 170.25 171.69*
in relation to the previous path is characterized by the *Optimum level.
lateral wire feed movement.
In order to conduct all the experiments under Fig.1 shows the effect of machining parameters
identical starting conditions, the one machining step so- contribution on cutting width. The ANOVA result
called Trim-one which all experiments were carried out indicates that open circuit voltage source (factor E) is the
using those machine settings [1]. most important parameter that significantly affects the
cutting with at approximately 46% (45.64%). This result
The cutting width values given in the study are the can be explained by the amount of discharge energy,
mathematical average of five measurements made from since the greater the discharge energy conducted into the
the workpiece with 0.3 mm growths along the cut length. machining domain, the greater the melted depth of the
The material removal rate (MRR), in m3/ sec., has workpiece created. Furthermore, greater discharge
been calculated from the following formula: energy will produce a larger removal material causing a
larger cutting width value on the workpiece. The cutting
S h width was also affected by the wire tension (Fw) and
MRR = ( m3 / s ) (4)
t flushing pressure (p) and the contribution were up to
20% (20.15%) and 17% (16.64%).
S: Contour area (mm2), measurements taken on aerial
photographs using the Digitizing Area-Line Meter
builder by Tamaya Corp., Japan, h is the thickness of
workpiece (0.45mm) and t is machining time. MRR
means the volume of material being removed per unit
time.

3. Experimental results

3.1 Cutting width analysis

Regardless of category of the performance Fig.1 The effect of machining parameters contribution on
characteristics, a greater S/N ratio value corresponds to cutting width.
a better performance. Therefore, the optimal level of the
machining parameters is the level with the greatest S/N
value. The Eqs. (1)-(3) give that the values for cutting 3.2 Material removal rate analysis
width experiment of L18 (see Table 3) was calculated in
Tables 4. Based on the analysis of S/N ratio, the optimal Table 5 indicates the S/N ratio values for material
machining parameter for minimum cutting width was removal rate (MRR) according to L18 orthogonal array,
obtained at 0.6 bar flushing pressure (level 1), 6 m as shown in Table 3. The optimal parameter
grain size (level 3), wire speed 75 (level 2), peak current combinations of maximum MRR are obtained as
1 (level 1), open circuit voltage 2 (level 1), servo voltage A1B1C2D3E3F1G1H3. The flushing pressure is at 0.6 bar
20 (level 1), pulse on duration 24 (level 3) and wire (level 1), 1.7 m grain size (level 1), wire speed 75
tension 1.1 N (level 3). The optimal combinations of (level 2), peak current 3 (level 3), open circuit voltage 4
cutting width are summarized as A1B3C2D1E1F1G3H3. (level 3), servo voltage 20 (level 1), pulse on duration 14
(level 1) and wire tension 1.1 N (level 3).
F. C. Hsu et al. / Procedia CIRP 6 (2013) 261 266 265

Table 5 The confirmation experiment is the final step in the


S/N ratio values for MRR first iteration of the design of experiment process. The
purpose of the confirmation experiment is to validate the
values for Mean by factor level (dB)
conclusions drawn during the analysis phase. The
MRR Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
confirmation experiment is performed by conducting a
(A)p(bar) 946.69* 943.37 -- test with specific combination of the factors and levels
(B)Grain size 638.07* 623.66 628.33 previously evaluated. In this study, after determining the
(C)Aw 629.97 630.57* 629.52 optimum conditions and predicting the response under
(D)I 621.02 628.11 640.93* these conditions, a new experiment was designed and
(E)UHP 604.44 628.99 656.62* conducted with the optimum levels of the process
(F)Ssoll 632.46* 629.49 628.11 parameters. The final step is to predict and verify the
(G)Ton 631.25* 628.72 630.09 improvement of the performance characteristic. The
(H)Fw 628.35 630.68 631.03* predicted S/N ratio using the optimal levels of the
*Optimum level. machining parameters can be calculated as:

Fig. 2 shows the effect of process parameters n


contribution on material removal rate (MRR). It was = m + (i m ) (5)
found that the MRR directly increases with increasing open i =1
circuit voltage (UHP) and peak current (I). The ANOVA
result indicates that open circuit voltage (factor E) is also
Where is the total mean S/N ratio, i is the mean
the most important parameter that significantly affects
S/N ratio at the optimal process parameter level, and n is
the material removal rate at approximately 78%
the number of the main design process parameters that
(77.62%).
significantly affect the cutting width and MRR of PCD.
In order to verify the predicted model, the observed
values and their predictive values of the surface
roughness and material removal rate are given in the
Table 7. Table 7 also shows the prediction error of
output parameters i.e. cutting width and material
removal rate. It has been seen that the maximum and
minimum error percentage for cutting width is 1.18%
and 0.72%, however, the predicted and experimental
Fig.2 The effect of process parameters contribution on
results for material removal rate maintains at a relatively
material removal rate (MRR)
constant value where the error is less than 0.2 %, as
A possible explanation for this result may be shown in Table 8.
explained by the fact that, during each electrical
discharge, intense heat is generated. The greater Table 7: Validation between experimental and predicted
discharge energy may cause local melting and hence results for cutting width (dB)
more evaporation of the amount of removal material Cutting width A1B3C2D1E1F1G3H3 Error
which increases material removal rate. The MRR is also Prediction 29.87 (Standard)
affected by peak current, however, the pulse on duration 29.51 1.18%
Measurement
and wire speed does not have much influence. The MRR 29.65 0.72%
increases at a linear rate as the grain size, it may be
assumed that they are moving towards a maximum. In Table 8: Validation between experimental and
the parameters range studied, cutting width is poorest on predicted results for MRR (dB)
the PCD in grain 1.7m, followed by 4m and the MRR A1B1C2D3E3F1G1H3 Error
highest quality machining with is achieved on 6m. Prediction 113.65 (Standard)
Irrespective of the parameters range studied, the MRR
inversely peaks at PCD in grain 6m, while it maintains 113.82 0.15%
Measurement
at a relatively constant level at 4m and 6m. It is no 113.77 0.10%
clear evident that smaller diamond particles result in a The erosion process causes the diamond matrix to be
worse cutting width, as a rule seems to work best over a exposed to a much greater extent, which is why the
narrower band of PCD grains. dimension of the diamond particles has a greater
influence on surface quality. This is illustrated by the
SEM pictures shown in Fig.3. The PCD in grain size of
3.3 Confirmation experiments
266 F. C. Hsu et al. / Procedia CIRP 6 (2013) 261 266

6 m for minimum cutting width and 1.7 m for on the contrary, is obtained at the finer grains.More
maximum MRR were performed by the optimum studies to investigate the wire EDM process parameters
parameter conditions. to achieve either the maximum material removal rate or
miniature features cutting width and to understand the
a b limit on the diamond grain size is necessary to promote
the machining accuracy of PCD by -WEDM as well as
other advanced engineering materials.

Acknowledgements

c d The support of the Metal Industries Research and


Development Centre (MIRDC) in Taiwan is gratefully
acknowledged.

References
Fig.3 SEM Images of PCD specimens, (a) 1.7m and
(b) 6m grain size at 1,800 magnification, (c) 1.7m and [1] Gnter Spur and Steffen Appel, Wire EDM cutting of PCD,
Industrial Diamond Review, pp 124-130.
(d) 6m grain size at 200-magnification. [2] Ahmet Hasalk , Ulas aydas, Experimental study of wire
electrical discharge machining of AISI D5 tool steel, Journal of
As the average diameter of the growth single-crystal Materials Processing Technology 148 (2004) 362-367.
diamond, the topography of the surface becomes [3] Saurav Datta, Siba Sankar Mahapatra, Modeling, simulation and
parametric optimization of wire EDM process using response
rougher. The porous structure is also typical of an eroded surface methodology coupled with grey-Taguchi technique,
PCD surface. It is likely that increased thermal removal International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology 2,
of the cobalt is not the only reason. (5), (2010), 162-183.
[4] Nihat Tosun , Can Cogunb, Gul Tosun, A study on kerf and
material removal rate in wire electrical discharge machining
4. Conclusions based on Taguchi method, Journal of Materials Processing
Technology 152 (2004) 316322.
[5] Y.S. Liao, J.T. Huang, H.C. Su, A study on the machining-
This study set out to determine the effect of micro parameters optimization of wire electrical discharge machining, J.
WEDM parameters on machining characteristics of Mater. Process. Technol. 71 (1997) 487-493.
PCD. The following conclusions may be drawn from the [6] D. Scott, S. Boyina, K.P. Rajurkar, Analysis and optimisation of
parameter combination in wire electrical discharge machining,
present study.
Int. J. Prod. Res. 29 (11) (1991) 2189-2207.
(1)The open circuit voltage (UHP) plays an important [7] Shunsuke Tomura, Masanori Kunieda, Analysis of electromagnetic
role in cutting width and material removal rate force in wire-EDM, Precision Engineering 33 (2009) 255-262.
(MRR). The contribution of UHP is up to 46% and [8] P.J. Ross, Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering, 2nd ed.,
McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 1996.
78% for cutting width and MRR, respectively.
(2)The cutting width is also reduced by higher wire
tension (FW:1.1 N) and lower flushing pressure
(p:0.6 bar). The MRR was primarily increased at
greater UHP and peak current (I).
(3)The optimal parameter combinations of minimum
cutting width and maximum MRR are obtained as
A1B3C2D1E1F1G3H3 and A1B1C2D3E3F1G1H3,
respectively.
(4) The PCD in grain size of 6 m is suitable for minimum
cutting width and the grain size of 1.7 m is good for
maximum MRR performed by the optimum parameter
conditions.

The confirmation tests indicated that it is possible to


decrease cutting width and increase MRR significantly
by using the proposed statistical technique. One of the
more significant findings to emerge from this study is
that the greater diamond particle seemingly results in a
better qualify cutting width and higher quality of MRR,

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen