Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
We climb into the bus and sit down. At this point there is a risk of
culture clash, of collision and conflict. It will undoubtedly occur if
the passenger is a foreigner who doesnt know Africa. Someone
like that will start looking around, squirming, inquiring, when will
the bus leave?
What do you mean, when? the astonished driver will reply. The
bus will leave when we find enough people to fill it up
The African who boards a bus sits down in a vacant seat, and
immediately falls into a state in which he spends a great portion
of his life: a benumbed waiting.
It is difficult to say.
The Shadow of the Sun-Ryszard Kapusciski
For the dream to become reality, the mans drive, vision and
talent must be answered by the nation. There could not be a Marx
in Saudi Arabia, a Gandhi in Germany or a Beethoven in Nigeria.
For a person (or an achievement) of a global impact to blossom,
the soil must be fertile. The countries that produced these
extraordinary personalities had the necessary background for that
particular genius to emerge.
For certain, each country will have its own writers, thinkers and
musicians; circumscribed by that particular environment, and of
relevance only to that particular culture. It is only given to a few
to produce persons and ideas of universal relevance. Anybody can
play cricket, but only a very few can invent a sport that can be
enjoyed by many cultures, worldwide. What Singapore has
become today is an inspiration to the entire world; it has shown
away forward. Place Lee Kuan Yew in another culture, and perhaps
the results would not have been that spectacular.
From time immemorial there have been several races living in this
country. Their relations have been mostly peaceful with the
occasional conflict, like in all histories. In 1948, we had a chance
at a new beginning, an opportunity to forge a national identity,
emphasise the common factors, becoming one. Our political
leadership was far below the required calibre for the task; leaving
for the future generations to deal with embittered racial relations
and a destructive three decades long civil war ( like many things
in this country, a long stalemate ,neither party capable of
achieving their ends nor bringing it to a speedy conclusion )
A tragi-comedy
Sadly, the more the politicians change in this country, more they
remain the same; we now have national budgets of which nearly
every proposal is given the short-shrift within days, smacking of
rank amateurism and superficiality in budget planning. No one
seems to know what became of the much spoken of Mansion
Tax, a tax on an asset.
Unchanging
On the other hand, when we look at our own history, there seems
to be an unchanging quality, a stoical temperament, an inability
to break free; with no discernible change between the methods of
governing between our first king Vijaya and the last, Sri Vikrama
Rajasinha, 2,000 years later. In between these two kings, there
have been several rulers said to have been benevolent, but that is
mainly on account of the personality of the king rather than a
change of system or the empowering of the people. Technology
wise, the latter stages of the kingdom appear a low point, kings of
centuries before being credited with better technology and much
bigger achievements than the subsequent.
Confusion reigns
What holds the key to the gravy train is not the election to
parliament by the voter. That is bound to happen, one way or the
other, once you become a candidate of a major political party. If a
person is simple unelectable, he can easily become an appointed
member of parliament through the Party! The crucial move is to
get in to the Party, preferably as the leader. Our political parties
are democratic only in name; in substance they are very much
like a private company of which the leader is the major
shareholder. It is nearly impossible to remove the leader unless he
in some way sells his shares. The Party in reality is a gathering of
deplorables; careerists , adventurers, hustlers and hangers on
around a strong man who in their calculations can manoeuvre
them into power on a future date and bring the machinery of the
State into their grubby hands.
The lifestyle that the elected has created for them is the basis of
the unspoken conspiracy that makes all politicians bedfellows.
Whatever the professed differences, our politicians will not upset
the wonderful existence that they have created. Herein perhaps
lies another difference between the European models (mainly
British), on which almost all our institutions as well as political
ideas are based.
It is difficult to say.
Posted by Thavam