Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
(AU/AIT/SSAA)
XII. Details of any other contribution / activity not covered above e.g. admissions,
administrative responsibility, programme coordination etc:
(Attach extra sheet if required)
S. No.
1 Represented ansal university in 3 educational fairs as admission counselors
2 Did cold calling to 1000 students to generate leads for admission
3 Worked as an faculty coordinator for cultural programs in SET Orientation, 2016
4 Worked for organizing inter school event Summer School, 2016 and released a video of the memories of
that event so as to appreciate the effort of the organizing team and to make a strong bond with the
participating schools.
the white board in room no D-310 was in very poor condition leading to difficulties in teaching and it took around two
months to get a new whiteboard installed in that room after sending continuous mails to facility department.
XIV. Briefly give your suggestions if any with regard to academic assignments/ self growth:
I think we should start video recording of lectures so that the students can refer them anytime. It will also lead to the
personality development of the faculty and will enhance the effectiveness of teaching.
XV. Your perspective plan for next session (Teaching, Research, Training, Consultancy,
Projects (Give Points): I will work on to improve my teaching skills and to guide students in music
club, Ansal university. I would also like to work in the admission team if given the opportunity to do so.
XVI. Your overall self-appraisal: I consider myself as a good teacher who not only teaches technical
subjects but also motivates students to achieve great heights and live their life to fullest. I love to play my
guitar and sing and encourage students to taste music as well.
XVII. Pease rate yourself on a five-point scale with 5 being the excellent and 1 the poor:
(5- Excellent 4- Very Good 3- Good 2- Average 1- Poor )
Teaching Research Consultancy/Training/Project Institution Building
5 1 1 5
A- Do you agree with the details given by the reported faculty in Part- 1? If yes, to what extent. If no,
specify the reasons:
B- Has the reported faculty been reprimanded during the period of the report? Give details:
C- Please give ratings on a five-point scale with 5 being the excellent and 1 the poor:
(5- Excellent 4- Very Good 3- Good 2- Average 1- Poor)
1. Health & Personality
2. Punctuality & Regularity
3. Initiative and Drive
4. Sense of Responsibility
5. Integrity
6. Communication Skills:
(a)Oral Communication
(b)Written Communication
7. (a) Proficiency in teaching
(b) Proficiency in Admission/Examination work
(c ) Capability of Handling any other work assigned to him/her
8. Behavior towards seniors/ superiors
9. Relationship/Attitude towards students
10. Relationship with fellow faculty and staff
11. Intelligence
12. Temperament and Manners
13. Willingness to work & Seriousness to duty
14. Reliability and Dependability
D
15. Whether possesses knowledge of Information Technology and whether he uses/ applies
this Technique for official work Yes No
E.
16. Shortcomings pointed out, if any indicate improvement shown thereon.
Signature:
PART III
Report of the Reviewing Committee
Signature:
Name and designation of Reviewing Committee