Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Hailey Gaitan
Mr.Keegan
English 2H
28 January 2016
The first step in the evolution of ethics is a sense of solidarity with other human beings.
In the article Can the Law Make Us Be Decent? by Jay Sterling Silver he takes the stand that
people should be required to help in emergency situations. He provides tragic stories of times
that no one helped. People should be both lawfully and morally obligated to help in emergency
situations but, there should be laws protecting them in the case that they had good intention but it
Can the law make us be decent? That is the question posed by the author Jay Silver in his
article, Can the Law Make us Be Decent? in the New York Times in 2012. The question and
the subsequent article discuss the two sides of the question, how much involvement in
emergency situations from bystanders is enough or should we have a law in place that required
bystanders to be involved in emergency situations. On the one hand, the author discusses, the
non-participatory response and lack of involvement from people not wanting to be involved in an
emergency situations. Conversely, the author discusses the possibilities of backlash from people
participating in what he contends is the Good Samaritan response. The difficulty the author
faces is trying to find the happy medium, leading to the question, what is the right amount of
response? and/or how much response is appropriate? The author provides three examples of
2
cases where there was no response from neighbors or bystanders, all with horrible outcomes. In
the first case, a woman was caught in the rising flood waters after Hurricane Sandy while
driving. Releasing her 2 and 4 year old sons in hopes of heading for dry land, she and the boys
were separated. Desperately pounding on doors to no answers, her children were swept away
and died. The second instance was a brutal stabbing and the third a rape. In all cases no one
stepped in or helped. These examples within the article provide insight into what can happen
when people do not get involved. People should be required to help in emergency situations but,
there should be a law protecting them in case they had good intention and things went bad.
In dyer need bystanders should offer assistance. The article, A State Champion vs. a
Runners Conscience is about a runner was in a race and his opponent fell and injured himself.
The runner was in the lead but was not sure if we wanted to continue with his race or stop and
help. His final decision was to stop and help but not everyone was happy with that choice. The
article stated I would have felt awful if I had-and that would have smoldered my mind a lot
more of my coach and my team(Hoyle 280). The Runner is discussing how he would have felt
if he did not stop to help. He felt it was the right thing to do. He felt like he was morally
obligated to stop and help even though it was not a requirement. The article, If Decency
Doesnt, Law Should Make Us Samaritans tells the story of the tragedy of Princess Diana. She
was being chased by paparazzi one night and her car crashed. Instead of calling the police and
seeking help the paparazzi took pictures. Due to the lack of medical attention it cost the princess
her life. This is why the authors, Gloria Allred and Lisa Bloom purposed, It is time to join
countries like France and insist there should be legal consequences for turning ones back on
someone in desperate need. They believe bystanders should not only be legally bound to help
3
but they should be punished if failure to do so. Without these laws it makes people able to watch
some horrific happen and not help. A man could be shot lying in the street and legally no one has
to call the police or go and help. If you cannot count on someone doing the right thing in these
In emergency situations people should have to help even if it is just by calling the police.
In todays society it is not acceptable that you can watch someone die and not have to do
anything about it. It would not hurt to have to lend a hand when it is really needed.