Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Summary
The future for Englands parks must be durable, democratic and adaptable.
Proposals that lack any one of these characteristics will fail.
Future financing and governance arrangements must be durable because
urban green spaces are a critical part of the nations infrastructure and need
long-term care and stewardship.
They must be democratic because local authority-owned parks are public
assets and provide benefits for the whole population.
They must be adaptable, first because green spaces will play an increasingly
important role in climate change adaptation and mitigation; and second,
because recreation and leisure interests are constantly changing.
Durability, democracy and adaptability are all at risk in a context of funding
cuts and short-term policy cycles.
To free parks from the impasse of central-local policy frameworks, local,
accountable and directly funded parks cooperatives should be established in
each local authority area, responsible for stewarding our parks in perpetuity.
Local parks co-operatives should have directly elected governing bodies and
the power to raise funds through a supplementary levy on local council taxes,
subject to direct democratic approval.
In addition, there should be a national endowment fund for urban green
infrastructure, responsible for major capital investments, equalisation of
resources between richer and poorer localities, and the creation of a national
centre for learning and excellence.
Introduction
1
Julian Dobson | Urban Pollinators Ltd | parks inquiry submission
Spaces. This submission builds on that evidence with updated proposals for
the future management and funding of Englands parks and green spaces.
2. Julian Dobson, the author of that report and this submission, is a researcher
and writer with a longstanding interest in the urban environment. He was the
founder and editorial director of the urban regeneration magazine, New
Start, and is author of How to Save Our Town Centres, published in 2015 by
Policy Press. He is particularly interested in how public policy can better
contribute to sustainable and inclusive towns and cities.
3. While this submission builds on the Groundwork report, it is being submitted
independently of Groundwork UK and all views expressed are the authors
own.
1
See the Local Government Associations Budget 2016 submission, for example.
2
Julian Dobson | Urban Pollinators Ltd | parks inquiry submission
the ability to plan for the long term. We are already beginning to see parks
sold for development as a budget-balancing measure.2
7. To provide the future our parks and people need, we propose the
establishment of local, accountable and directly funded parks cooperatives in
each local authority area, responsible for stewarding our parks in perpetuity.
8. In addition, a national endowment fund for urban green infrastructure should
be set up, responsible for major capital investments, the equalisation of
resources between richer and poorer localities, and the creation of a national
centre for learning and excellence to share knowledge and expertise. Both
proposals are explained in more detail below.
3
Julian Dobson | Urban Pollinators Ltd | parks inquiry submission
13. For all these reasons, parks should be considered essential to the nations
infrastructure - what the National Audit Office has described as a vital
element of a civilised urban environment. That requires a commitment to
long-term investment and maintenance, supported by reliable and
sustainable funding and management. Assets whose value spans multiple
generations should not be left to the mercy of short-term political and
economic considerations.
14. At present, however, parks are near the bottom of the political pecking
order. National investment decisions prioritise highly visible structures such
as roads and railways, supporting interventions in landscapes while
neglecting the landscapes themselves. The skills and knowledge required to
protect and care for urban green spaces have been allowed to wither,
characterised by the dismantling of CABE Space as a centre of expertise by
the Coalition government of 2010-15.
15. At local level, councils must balance the stewardship of their parks with a
host of statutory duties. As resources are squeezed the most urgent duties
will take priority. A local authority forced to choose between safeguarding a
child at risk of abuse today and caring for a green space tomorrow has no
moral choice: the child must be safeguarded. To put councils in a position
where such choices become routine is to cement the neglect of parks and
green spaces into everyday practice.
16. The result is a culture of inevitable decline. Policymakers cannot plead
ignorance: they knew this would be the case. They were warned by the
Communities and Local Government Committees predecessor in 1999:
members declared themselves shocked at the weight of evidence, far
beyond our expectations, about the extent of the problems parks have faced
in the last 30 years.5
17. They were warned again in 2006, when the National Audit Office cautioned
that the improvements of the early 2000s were fragile. Central government
expects local green space managers to make the case for green space
expenditure against other pressing priorities there is the danger that when
budgets are tight, the case for green space will not be made effectively, will
slip down the local priority list and decline will set in again.6 That warning
has proved prescient, as the Heritage Lottery Funds recent research has
shown. National policymaking, it would appear, is characterised by amnesia.
5
Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Committee (1999). Twentieth Report: Town and
country parks.
6
National Audit Office (2006). Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Enhancing urban green space.
4
Julian Dobson | Urban Pollinators Ltd | parks inquiry submission
5
Julian Dobson | Urban Pollinators Ltd | parks inquiry submission
benefits. And it must be accountable to the people who use the parks in as
direct a manner as practicable, through transparent decision-making coupled
with representative oversight. All these suggest that parks management and
finance should be decoupled from the many other responsibilities of local
government.
24. There are several models that can serve as exemplars or alternative forms of
management, from Milton Keynes Parks Trust to the Minneapolis Parks and
Recreation Board. The CABE Space report, Is the grass greener? examined a
range of international models and merits more attention than it received
when it was published.7 The proposal below draws on some of the thinking in
that report.
7
CABE Space (n.d.). Is the grass greener? Available at the National Archives.
8
See http://www.foodsecurity.ac.uk/issue/uk.html
6
Julian Dobson | Urban Pollinators Ltd | parks inquiry submission
keeping - the long-term care that brings people back to places again and
again9 - rather than short-term income generation.
9
Dempsey, N., Smith, H. and Burton, M. (2014). Place-keeping: open space management in practice.
Abingdon, Routledge.
7
Julian Dobson | Urban Pollinators Ltd | parks inquiry submission
place at three or five-year intervals rather than annually, avoiding the spend
it by 31 March syndrome.
35. As well as revenue funding, our parks need capital investment - to create new
parks in areas of growing population, to remodel parks to maximise their
ecological functions, to address the growing backlog of repairs and
maintenance, and to invest in disadvantaged and under-resourced localities.
So the second part of our proposal is to create a national endowment fund,
managed in a similar way to (for example) the Local Trust, and initially funded
by central government as infrastructure investment.
36. The scale of such an endowment needs to be sufficient to generate annual
investments that at least match the average funds provided through central
government and Lottery funding in the first decade of this century. Austerity
should not be an excuse for inaction, but a spur to long-term thinking.
Britains first national parks were created at the height of post-war austerity
in 1951, and that investment has stood the test of time.
37. As well as funding capital investment, the national endowment should
support a hub for learning and support, building the skills and knowledge
needed for effective place-keeping. This should be done in partnership with
existing sources of expertise such as the Royal Horticultural Society and the
National Trust, but cannot be left to them.