Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PII: S0263-8762(14)00215-9
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2014.05.005
Reference: CHERD 1583
To appear in:
Please cite this article as: Yuan, S., Zou, C., Yin, H., Chen, Z., Yang,
W.,Study on the Separation of Binary Azeotropic Mixtures by Continuous
Extractive Distillation, Chemical Engineering Research and Design (2014),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2014.05.005
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof
before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that
apply to the journal pertain.
1 Study on the Separation of Binary Azeotropic Mixtures by Continuous
2 Extractive Distillation
3 Shenfeng Yuan, Cancan Zou, Hong Yin, Zhirong Chen, Wendong Yang
t
4 Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
ip
5 Abstract:
cr
6 For azeotropic mixtures or close-boiling mixtures which is often observed in the pharmaceutical
us
7 and specialty chemicals industries, conventional distillation has been shown to be unable to reach
8 the separation desired. In this paper, continuous extractive distillation (CED) was used to separate
an
9 acetonetetrahydrofuran, n-hexane-tetrahydrofuran, n-hexane-ethyl acetate and ethyl acetate-
10 ethanol that form azeotropic mixtures. The characters of the CED were simulated with Aspen Plus
M
11 and experiments also showed the feasibility of the technology in separating the azeotropic
12 mixtures. The mass fraction of the light component in the separation of acetonetetrahydrofuran,
d
te
14 99.00%, 99.15% and 98.80% respectively. These azeotropic mixtures were separated successfully
p
15 through solvent selection based on polarity principle and pseudo-binary vapor-liquid equilibrium,
ce
16 simulation via Aspen Plus and experimental verification. This algorithm may become a generally
Ac
17 applicable method for solvent selection in developing new extractive distillation processes.
19 1. Introduction
Correspondence:Dr.HYin(yinh@zju.edu.cn)
DepartmentofChemicalandBiologicalEngineering,
ZhejiangUniversity,Hangzhou,310027,P.R.China.
1
Page 1 of 21
1 In the specialty chemicals industry, distillation is one of the oldest and most widely used
2 separation processes. The separation is based on the difference in boiling temperature of the
3 components. By vaporising and condensing the mixtures, the lower boiling component is enriched
4 in the vapor phase while the higher boiling component is enriched in the liquid phase[1]. But not
t
5 all liquid mixtures can be separated by conventional distillation, when the components to be
ip
6 separated constitute azeotropic mixtures which are often observed in the pharmaceutical and
cr
7 specialty chemicals industries, conventional distillation has been shown to be unable to reach the
separation desired. The extractive distillation can be used to solve the problem[2].
us
8
9 Extractive distillation has a history of about seventy years, during the Second World War,
an
10 because of the great demand of the butadiene and high purity of toluene. The extractive distillation
11 technology has been widely used and become an important industrial process. Extractive
M
12 distillation can be divided into two categories according to the mode of operation: continuous
14 In extractive distillation, usually a feasible solvent is fed to the column to break the azeotropes.
te
15 When the solvent is fed continuously in the top section of the column, the process is called CED.
16 For separation of all constituents two columns are needed, one column for extractive separation
p
17 and a second column for solvent regeneration. The mixture and the solvent are fed to the first
ce
18 column, where the low boiling component is separated from the less volatile component plus
19 solvent. The less volatile component and the solvent collect in the bottoms and the light
Ac
20 component collects on top of the column. The bottom product is fed to the second column in
21 which the solvent is recovered and recycled to the first column[5]. Aspen model of extractive
23 In the pharmaceutical and specialty chemicals industries batch extractive distillation is often
24 used for recovery of the organic solvents[6-8]. However, for higher throughput economics of CED
25 is better.
Page 2 of 21
1 Identification of suitable solvents and optimum operating conditions are the crucial steps in the
2 design of extractive distillation processes. Solvent selection [9-14], optimization via computer
3 simulation with commercial process simulators [14-18] and experimental validation of extractive
4 distillation processes[19-21] have been investigated intensively. However, there are few papers
t
5 that study the universal applicability of the algorithm.
ip
cr
6 Fig. 2 showsthevapor-liquid equilibrium of acetone-tetrahydrofuran, n-hexane-tetrahydrofuran,
7 n-hexane- ethyl acetate and ethyl acetate - ethanol at 1atm predicted by UNIQUAC model. All of
us
8 these binary systems form azeotropic mixtures. They are often observed in the pharmaceutical and
an
9 specialty chemicals industries. Separation of these binary systems by CED has not yet been
10 reported. Therefore, the separation of these four azeotropic mixtures was investigated applying a
M
11 procedure including solvent selection based on polarity principle, pseudo-binary vapor-liquid
12 equilibrium, simulation and optimization via Aspen Plus and experimental verification. The
d
13 purpose of this study is to establish a simple, convenient and generally applicable method in
te
15 2. Solvent selection
ce
17 The solvent must have special characteristics to achieve the desired separation as follows:
18 thermal stability, low toxicity, higher boiling point, simple recoverability and selectivity[21].
19 Thereamong selectivity is the key characteristic. In this paper, the solvents were chosen based on
20 polarity principle on the condition that the above basic requirements were satisfied. The polarity of
21 the solvent is close to the polarity of the heavy component, inducing interaction of the heavy
22 component and the solvent, and the relative volatility of the original components of the mixture is
Page 3 of 21
1 modified. The dielectric constant serves as a proper scale of polarity. Therefore, the difference of
2 dielectric constant between the selected solvent and the heavy component should be less than that
3 between the selected solvent and the light component. For large difference of the boiling points of
components of the azeotropic mixture, the low boiling component is chosen as the light
t
4
ip
5 component. For close-boiling mixture, owing to strong molecular interaction between molecules
cr
6 with high polarity, the component whose dielectric constant is smaller is chosen as the light
us
7 component. Table 1[22] presents the dielectric constant and boiling point of each component and
8 potential solvents.
an
9 For acetonetetrahydrofuran, the boiling point of acetone is lower than that of tetrahydrofuran.
10 Acetone is the light component which is collected in the top of the column. Butyl ether, xylene,
M
11 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene and diethylbenzene whose dielectric constant is lower than that of
14 The dielectric constant of tetrahydrofuran is higher than that of n-hexane. n-Hexane is the light
p
18 For n-hexane-ethyl acetate, the boiling point of n-hexane is lower than that of ethyl acetate.
19 n-Hexane is the light component which is collected in the top of the column. NMP, pyrrole,
20 2-methylpyridine and 3-methylpyridine whose dielectric constant is higher than that of ethyl
22 For ethyl acetate-ethanol, the boiling point of ethyl acetate is close to that of ethanol, the
Page 4 of 21
1 dielectric constant of ethanol is higher than that of ethyl acetate. Ethyl acetate is the light
2 component which is collected in the top of the column. DMF, NMP, and dimethyl sulfoxide
3 (DMSO) whose dielectric constant is higher than that of ethanol are chosen as the potential
solvents.
t
4
ip
5 2.2 Vapor-liquid equilibrium
cr
6 In order to determine the final solvent, the pseudo-binary vapor-liquid equilibrium data of the
us
7 four azeotropic mixtures were predicted by UNIQUAC model. The solvent that gives the largest
8 relative volatility of the original components of the mixture was chosen as the final solvent.
an
9 Fig. 3 shows the pseudo-binary vapor-liquid equilibrium of acetone-tetrahydrofuran with a
10 solvent to feed volume ratio 3. From Fig. 3 it could be seen that the relative volatility with the
M
11 solvent butyl ether is larger than that with xylene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene or diethylbenzene as
12 solvent. So butyl ether was chosen as the solvent to separate acetone and tetrahydrofuran.
d
te
14 solvent to feed volume ratio 3. From Fig. 4 it could be seen that the relative volatility with the
p
15 solvent NMP is larger than that with DMF, 2-methylpyridine or 3-methylpyridine as solvent. So
ce
18 solvent to feed volume ratio 3. From Fig. 5 it could be seen that the relative volatility with the
19 solvent NMP is larger than that with pyrrole, 2-methylpyridine or 3-methylpyridine as solvent. So
20 NMP was chosen as the solvent to separate n-hexane and ethyl acetate.
21 Fig. 6 shows the pseudo-binary vapor-liquid equilibrium of ethyl acetate-ethanol witha solvent
22 to feed volume ratio 3. From Fig. 6 it could be seen that the relative volatility with the solvent
Page 5 of 21
1 DMSO is larger than that with NMP or DMF as solvent. So DMSO was chosen as the solvent to
3 3. Simulation
Extractive distillation was simulated with RadFrac routine of Aspen Plus. Sensitivity analysis
t
4
ip
5 was used to establish the operating conditions for the extractive distillation column. UNIQUAC
cr
6 model was selected for the prediction of physical properties in the simulation. The parameters
us
7 analyzed were as follows: number of stage (NS), reflux mass ratio (R), mixture feed stage (FS),
8 solvent feed stage (SFS) and solvent to feed volume ratio (S/F). The optimum parameters obtained
an
9 was shown in Table 2, and Table 3 shows the corresponding simulation results. From Table 3 it
10 could be seen that the mass fraction of the light component in the separation of
M
11 acetonetetrahydrofuran, n-hexane-tetrahydrofuran, n-hexane-ethyl acetate and ethyl acetate-
13 4. Experiment
14 Table 4 shows the parameters of the experiment and Fig. 7 shows the drawing of the
p
15 experimental equipment. The extractive distillation column has a total height of 3.0 m and an
ce
16 internal diameter of 0.05 m. It was packed with glass spring packing of 3 mm 10 mm. The
Ac
17 bottom is a flask of 3000 ml. The flow rate and reflux ratio is controlled by constant flow pump
18 and solenoid valve respectively. The solvent recovery column has a total height of 1.8 m and an
19 internal diameter of 0.05 m. It was packed with glass spring packing of 3 mm 10 mm. The
22 1. 500 ml binary mixture was charged into the flask of the extractive distillation column. It
Page 6 of 21
1 was heated and kept under total reflux for 60 min.
2 2. Solvent was charged into the extractive distillation column according to the data in Table 4
3 and binary mixture was charged into the extractive distillation column at 3ml/min, then the
extractive distillation column was kept under total reflux until the mass fraction of the light
t
4
ip
5 component in distillate reached a stable state.
cr
6 3. The distillate was taken out at the constant reflux ratio, the flow rate of binary mixture was
us
7 gradually increased till the value in Table 4. The bottom product was pumped to the solvent
8 recovery column to keep the extractive distillation column under an equilibrium state. In the
an
9 solvent recovery column, the heavy component was taken out and the solvent was pumped to the
10 storage tank of the solvent to keep the solvent recovery column under an equilibrium state.
M
11 4.2 Results and discussions
d
12 Table 5 shows the experimental results. From Table 5 it could be seen that the light component
te
acetate and ethyl acetate-ethanol reached high purity respectively. The experimental data and
p
14
ce
15 simulation results compare well (within a standard deviation of 0.8%). No major discrepancy is
16 noticed, even though the simulation is based on numerous assumptions such as constant molar
Ac
17 hold-up in the column, omission of fluid-dynamics, no heat losses over the column and no
19 5. Conclusions
21 ethanol were separated successfully through solvent selection based on polarity principle and
22 pseudo-binary vapor-liquid equilibrium, simulation via Aspen Plus and experimental verification.
7
Page 7 of 21
1 The simulation results were experimentally verified. The proposed algorithm may become a
2 simple, convenient and generally applicable method for solvent selection in developing new
3 extractive distillation processes. It may greatly reduce the workload and save time. The work for
the validation of the algorithm in other low boiling azeotropic mixtures is in progress.
t
4
ip
5 Acknowledgments
cr
6 This work is supported by the Program for Zhejiang Leading Team of S&T Innovation
us
7 (2011R50007).
8 Abbreviations
an
NS number of stage
9 References:
10 [1] Emhamed AM, Czuczai B, Rev E, Lelkes Z. Analysis of Extractive Distillation with
12 [2] Luyben W L, Chien I L, Design and Control of Distillation Systems for Separating Azeotropes.
Page 8 of 21
1 [3] Benedict M RR. Extractive and Azeotropic Distillation.Trans Inst Chem Eng 41(1945)
2 353-370.
t
4
ip
5 [5] Gil ID, Botia DC, Ortiz P, Sanchez OF.Extractive Distillation of Acetone/Methanol Mixture
cr
6 Using Water as Entrainer. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(2009)4858-4865.
us
7 [6] Van Kaam R, Rodriguez-Donis I, Gerbaud V. Heterogeneous extractive batch distillation of
an
9 [7]Lang P, Kovacs G, Kotai B, Gaal-Szilagyi J, Modla G. Industrial application of a new batch
10 extractive distillation operational policy. IChemE Symposium Series 152 (2006) 830-839,.
M
11 [8]Lang P, Hegely L, Kovacs G, Gaal-Szilagyi J, Kotai B. Solvent Recovery From A
14 [9] Van DB, Nieuwoudt I. Design of solvents for extractive distillation. Ind Eng Chem Res
p
15 39(2000) 1423-1429.
ce
21 in solvent mixtures using the dilutor technique. Ind Eng Chem Res 39(2000) 2114-2123.
22 [13] Ewell RH HJBL. Rapid screening of extractive distillation solvents. Ind Eng Chem Res
Page 9 of 21
1 871(1994).
2 [14] Lek-utaiwan P, Suphanit B, Douglas PL, Mongkolsiri N. Design of extractive distillation for
3 the separation of close-boiling mixtures: Solvent selection and column optimization. Comput
t
4
ip
5 [15] Langston P, Hilal N, Shingfield S, Webb S. Simulation and optimisation of extractive
cr
6 distillation with water as solvent. Chem Eng Process 44(2005)345-351.
us
7 [16] Gil ID, Uyazan AM, Aguilar JL, Rodriguez G, Caicedo LA. Separation of ethanol and water
8 by extractive distillation with salt and solvent as entrainer: Process simulation. Braz J Chem Eng
an
9 25(2008)207-215.
10 [17] Lladosa E, Monton JB, Burguet M. Separation of di-n-propyl ether and n-propyl alcohol by
M
11 extractive distillation and pressure-swing distillation: Computer simulation and economic
13 [18] de Figueiredo MF, Guedes BP, de Araujo J, Vasconcelos L, Brito RP.Optimal design of
14 extractive distillation columns-A systematic procedure using a process simulator. Chem Eng Res
p
16 [19] Xu SL, Wang HY.A new entrainer for separation of tetrahydrofuran-water azeotropic mixture
Ac
18 [20] Resa JM, Gonzalez C, Ruiz A. Experiments of extractive distillation at laboratory scale for
19 the rupture of the azeotropic mixture acetone plus isopropyl ether. Sep Purif Technol
20 18(2000)103-110.
21 [21] Lladosa E, Monton JB, Burguet MC, Munoz R. Phase equilibria involved in extractive
10
Page 10 of 21
1 Equilib 255(2007) 62-69.
2 [22] Cheng NL. Solvent Handbook. BeiJing. Chem Ind Press. 2008.
t
4
ip
5
cr
us
an
M
d
p te
ce
Ac
11
Page 11 of 21
1 Table Captions
2 Table1 The dielectric constant and boiling point of each component and potential solvents
t
4
ip
5 Table 4 Parameters of the experiment
cr
6 Table 5 The experimental results
us
7
an
9
10
M
11
12
d
te
13
14
p
15
ce
16
Ac
17
18
19
20
21
22 Table 1 The dielectric constant and boiling point of each component and potential solvents
12
Page 12 of 21
material dielectric constant boiling point()
t
3-methylpyridine 10.71 143.8
ip
2-methylpyridine 9.46 129.4
pyrrole 8 130
cr
tetrahydrofuran 7.58 65.4
ethyl acetate 6.02 77
butyl ether 3.06 142
us
diethylbenzene 2.369 181.102
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene 2.279 164.716
xylene 2.266 144.4
an
n-hexane 1.89 68.7
1
2 Table 2 The optimum parameters obtained from sensitivity analysis
M
3
column parameters acetone- n-hexane- n-hexane- ethyl acetate-
tetrahydrofuran tetrahydrofuran ethyl acetate ethanol
Feed temperature 30 30 30 30
d
NS 53 37 40 38
EDC SFS 7 3 3 5
p
FS 24 20 18 17
R 3 2 2.5 3
ce
Pressure (atm) 1 1 1 1
Pressure (atm) drop of column 0.1 0.1 0.1 01.
Mass fraction of binary feed 0.62/0.38 0.43/0.57 0.61/0.39 0.32/0.68
Ac
NS 17 12 11 18
FS 10 5 5 10
SRDC R 3.5 2 1.5 2
Pressure (atm) 1 1 1 1
Pressure (atm) drop of tower 0.1 01. 0.1 0.1
Page 13 of 21
Ds Ws Ds Ws
acetone 99.00 0 0 0
tetrahydrofuran 1.00 11.90 100 0.0044
butyl ether 0.0037 88.10 0.0463 100
n-hexane 99.10 0 0 0
tetrahydrofuran 0.90 15.40 100 0
t
NMP 0.0911 84.60 0.0103 100
ip
n-hexane 99.00 0 0 0.0011
ethyl acetate 0.90 7.8 100 0
cr
NMP 0.0973 92.2 0.0213 100
ethyl acetate 99.10 0 0 0
us
ethanol 0.90 11.10 100 0
DMSO 0.0017 88.90 0.0018 100
1
an
2 Table 4 Parameters of the experiment
3
column parameters acetone- n-hexane- n-hexane- ethyl acetate-
M
tetrahydrofuran tetrahydrofuran ethylacetate ethanol
Distillate flow (ml/min) 3.2 2.3 3.2 3.3
Solvent flow (ml/min) 15 20 15 15
Mixture flow (ml/min) 5 5 5 5
d
NS 53 37 40 38
te
EDC SFS 7 3 3 5
FS 24 20 18 17
R 3 2 2.5 3
p
FS 10 5 5 10
SRDC R 3.5 2 1.5 2
Distillate flow (ml/min) 1.8 2.7 1.8 1.7
Ac
14
Page 14 of 21
hr DE(acetone) WE(acetone) DE(tetrahydrofuran) WE(tetrahydrofuran)
(wt%) (wt%) (wt%) (wt%)
1.0 99.020 0.017 99.20 0.45
2.0 99.050 0.020 99.17 0.53
3.0 99.040 0.017 99.22 0.51
4.0 99.035 0.019 99.19 0.48
t
extractive distillation column solvent regeneration column
Time
ip
DE(n-hexane) WE(n-hexane) DE(tetrahydrofuran) WE(tetrahydrofuran)
hr
(wt%) wt% wt% wt%
cr
1.0 99.02 0. 03 99.41 0.35
2.0 99.03 0.04 99.31 0.38
3.0 99.01 0.03 99.29 0.49
us
4.0 99.00 0.05 99.34 0.36
extractive distillation column solvent regeneration column
Time
an
DE(n-hexane) WE(n-hexane) DE(ethyl acetate) WE(ethyl acetate)
hr
wt% wt% wt% wt%
1.0 99.17 0.06 99.28 0.43
2.0 99.15 0.05 99.32 0.41
M
3.0 99.15 0.06 99.29 0.40
4.0 99.16 0.07 99.27 0.44
d
1
Ac
15
Page 15 of 21
1 Figure Captions
Fig.3 Pseudo-binary x-y plot for acetone-tetrahydrofuran with a solvent to feed volume ratio 3
t
4
ip
5 Fig.4 a.Pseudo-binary x-y plot for n-hexane-tetrahydrofuran with a solvent to feed volume ratio 3
cr
6 Fig.5 Pseudo-binary x-y plot for n-hexane-ethyl acetate with a solvent to feed volume ratio 3
us
7 Fig.6 Pseudo-binary x-y plot for ethyl acetate-ethanol with a solvent to feed volume ratio 3
an
8 Fig.7 The scheme of the experimental equipment
9
M
10
11
d
12
te
13
14
p
15
ce
EDC SRDC
Ac
MIXER
S D-LIGHT D-HEAVY
S+
W
COOLER
SR
16
17 Fig.1
16
Page 16 of 21
1.0
0.9
acetone-tetrahydrofuran
0.8 n-hexane-tetrahydrofuran
t
ip
0.5
y
0.4
cr
0.3
0.2
us
0.1
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
x
an
1
2 Fig.2
M
3
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
1.0 1.0
d
Butyl ether
0.9 Xylene 0.9
te
0.6 0.6
0.5 0.5
ce
0.4 0.4
0.3 0.3
0.2 0.2
Ac
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
xacetone
4
5 Fig.3
17
Page 17 of 21
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
1.0 1.0
y(n-hexane
0.6 0.6
t
0.5 0.5
ip
0.4 0.4
0.3 0.3
cr
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
us
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
x(n-hexane
1
an
2 Fig.4
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
1.0 1.0
M
NMP
0.9 0.9
2-methylpyridine
0.8 3-methylpyridine 0.8
pyrrole
0.7 0.7
d
y(n-hexane
0.6 0.6
te
0.5 0.5
0.4 0.4
p
0.3 0.3
0.2 0.2
ce
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
x(n-hexane
Ac
4 Fig.5
18
Page 18 of 21
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
1.0 1.0
DMSO
0.9 0.9
DMF
0.8 0.8
y(ethyl acetate
NMP
0.7 0.7
0.6 0.6
t
0.5 0.5
ip
0.4 0.4
0.3 0.3
cr
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
us
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
x(ethyl acetate
1
an
2 Fig.6
M
d
p te
ce
Ac
water;5-controller of reflux ratio; 6-valve; 7-light key component sample collection; 8-light key
19
Page 19 of 21
component receiver; 9-storage tank of solvent; 10-constant flow pump; 11-storage tank of
mixture;12- sample of heavy key component and solvent collection; 13- solvent sample collection;
14-flask;15-heating jacket; 16-extractive distillation column; 17- heavy key component receiver;
18- heavy key component sample collection; 19-solvent recovery distillation column
t
ip
1 Fig.7
cr
2
us
4
5
an
M
d
p te
ce
Ac
20
Page 20 of 21
1 Highlights
3 2. Solvent selection was based on polarity principle and Aspen Plus simulation.
t
4
ip
5 4. An algorithm in developing new extractive distillation processes was proposed.
cr
6
us
an
M
d
p te
ce
Ac
21
Page 21 of 21