HTS Report

d2 Test of
Attention
Technical Report

A Sample Mouse
ID 8603-231
Date 17/12/2015

Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

 d2 | Overview 2 / 12

OVERVIEW

Structure of this report

Profile sheet
Table of scores
Scale details
Additional information

Only qualified psychologists or appropriately trained test administrators should interpret psychometric test results. Please follow the
relevant guidelines from the appropriate professional body.

A Sample
Assessment date 17/12/2015 | D.o.b. 08/02/1990 | Gender f Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford
 d2 | Profile sheet 3 / 12

PROFILE SHEET

d2 Test of Attention | Mouse

Apprenticeship applicants, DE: total sample - SW Score (100+10z)

Complete results
494 95 TN Total number of symbols
processed

481 94 TN-E Symbols recognised

correctly
Total number of symbols
processed minus errors made

2.63 90 E% Error percentage

High norm values correspond to
a low error percentage

9 111 FL Fluctuation
High norm values correspond to
low fluctuation

A Sample
Assessment date 17/12/2015 | D.o.b. 08/02/1990 | Gender f Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford
 d2 | Table of scores 4 / 12
TABLE OF SCORES

d2 Test of Attention | Mouse

Apprenticeship applicants, DE: total sample - SW Score (100+10z)

Scale Raw val Normed val

Complete results
TN Total number of symbols processed 494 95
TN-E Symbols recognised correctly 481 94
E% Error percentage 2.63 90
FL Fluctuation 9 111
E Total number of errors (E1+E2) 13
E1 Omitted 11
E2 Confused 2
E2L Wrong letter 1
E2D Wrong number of dots 1

d2 Test of Attention | Mouse

Apprenticeship applicants, DE: total sample - SW Score (100+10z)

Scale Raw val

Series 1
01 TN Total number of symbols processed 36
01 TN-E Symbols recognised correctly 36
01 E Total number of errors (E1+E2) 0
01 E1 Omitted 0
01 E2 Confused 0
01 E2L Wrong letter 0
01 E2D Wrong number of dots 0

A Sample
Assessment date 17/12/2015 | D.o.b. 08/02/1990 | Gender f Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford
 d2 | Table of scores 5 / 12
d2 Test of Attention | Mouse
Apprenticeship applicants, DE: total sample - SW Score (100+10z)

Scale Raw val

Series 2
02 TN Total number of symbols processed 45
02 TN-E Symbols recognised correctly 42
02 E Total number of errors (E1+E2) 3
02 E1 Omitted 2
02 E2 Confused 1
02 E2L Wrong letter 0
02 E2D Wrong number of dots 1
Series 3
03 TN Total number of symbols processed 39
03 TN-E Symbols recognised correctly 38
03 E Total number of errors (E1+E2) 1
03 E1 Omitted 1
03 E2 Confused 0
03 E2L Wrong letter 0
03 E2D Wrong number of dots 0
Series 4
04 TN Total number of symbols processed 45
04 TN-E Symbols recognised correctly 45
04 E Total number of errors (E1+E2) 0
04 E1 Omitted 0
04 E2 Confused 0
04 E2L Wrong letter 0
04 E2D Wrong number of dots 0

A Sample
Assessment date 17/12/2015 | D.o.b. 08/02/1990 | Gender f Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford
 d2 | Table of scores 6 / 12
d2 Test of Attention | Mouse
Apprenticeship applicants, DE: total sample - SW Score (100+10z)

Scale Raw val

Series 5
05 TN Total number of symbols processed 41
05 TN-E Symbols recognised correctly 38
05 E Total number of errors (E1+E2) 3
05 E1 Omitted 3
05 E2 Confused 0
05 E2L Wrong letter 0
05 E2D Wrong number of dots 0
Series 6
06 TN Total number of symbols processed 36
06 TN-E Symbols recognised correctly 34
06 E Total number of errors (E1+E2) 2
06 E1 Omitted 2
06 E2 Confused 0
06 E2L Wrong letter 0
06 E2D Wrong number of dots 0
Series 7
07 TN Total number of symbols processed 43
07 TN-E Symbols recognised correctly 42
07 E Total number of errors (E1+E2) 1
07 E1 Omitted 1
07 E2 Confused 0
07 E2L Wrong letter 0
07 E2D Wrong number of dots 0

A Sample
Assessment date 17/12/2015 | D.o.b. 08/02/1990 | Gender f Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford
 d2 | Table of scores 7 / 12
d2 Test of Attention | Mouse
Apprenticeship applicants, DE: total sample - SW Score (100+10z)

Scale Raw val

Series 8
08 TN Total number of symbols processed 37
08 TN-E Symbols recognised correctly 37
08 E Total number of errors (E1+E2) 0
08 E1 Omitted 0
08 E2 Confused 0
08 E2L Wrong letter 0
08 E2D Wrong number of dots 0
Series 9
09 TN Total number of symbols processed 43
09 TN-E Symbols recognised correctly 43
09 E Total number of errors (E1+E2) 0
09 E1 Omitted 0
09 E2 Confused 0
09 E2L Wrong letter 0
09 E2D Wrong number of dots 0
Series 10
10 TN Total number of symbols processed 43
10 TN-E Symbols recognised correctly 42
10 E Total number of errors (E1+E2) 1
10 E1 Omitted 1
10 E2 Confused 0
10 E2L Wrong letter 0
10 E2D Wrong number of dots 0

A Sample
Assessment date 17/12/2015 | D.o.b. 08/02/1990 | Gender f Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford
 d2 | Table of scores 8 / 12
d2 Test of Attention | Mouse
Apprenticeship applicants, DE: total sample - SW Score (100+10z)

Scale Raw val

Series 11
11 TN Total number of symbols processed 41
11 TN-E Symbols recognised correctly 40
11 E Total number of errors (E1+E2) 1
11 E1 Omitted 1
11 E2 Confused 0
11 E2L Wrong letter 0
11 E2D Wrong number of dots 0
Series 12
12 TN Total number of symbols processed 45
12 TN-E Symbols recognised correctly 44
12 E Total number of errors (E1+E2) 1
12 E1 Omitted 0
12 E2 Confused 1
12 E2L Wrong letter 1
12 E2D Wrong number of dots 0

A Sample
Assessment date 17/12/2015 | D.o.b. 08/02/1990 | Gender f Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford
 d2 | Scale details 9 / 12
SCALE DETAILS

TN Total number of symbols processed

Apprenticeship applicants, DE: total sample - SW Score (100+10z)

Raw val 494

Normed val 95

TN-E Symbols recognised correctly

Apprenticeship applicants, DE: total sample - SW Score (100+10z)

Raw val 481

Normed val 94

Total number of symbols processed minus errors made

E% Error percentage
Apprenticeship applicants, DE: total sample - SW Score (100+10z)

Raw val 2.63

Normed val 90

High norm values correspond to a low error percentage

A Sample
Assessment date 17/12/2015 | D.o.b. 08/02/1990 | Gender f Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford
 d2 | Scale details 10 / 12
FL Fluctuation
Apprenticeship applicants, DE: total sample - SW Score (100+10z)

Raw val 9
Normed val 111

High norm values correspond to low fluctuation

A Sample
Assessment date 17/12/2015 | D.o.b. 08/02/1990 | Gender f Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford
 d2 | Additional information 11 / 12

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Performance over the course of the test

Series %TN-E Share of total TN-E performed in each series

1 7.48

2 8.73

3 7.90

4 9.36

5 7.90

6 7.07

7 8.73

8 7.69

9 8.94

10 8.73

11 8.32

12 9.15

A Sample
Assessment date 17/12/2015 | D.o.b. 08/02/1990 | Gender f Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford
 d2 | Additional information 12 / 12

Accuracy vs. Speed (TN-E in relation to E%)

A Sample
Assessment date 17/12/2015 | D.o.b. 08/02/1990 | Gender f Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford