Job knowledge 68: A general review of the causes and acceptance of shape im...

Page 1 of 3

A general review of the causes and acceptance of shape imperfections - Part 2

Part 1.
This second article on shape imperfections refers mostly to fillet welds but there are two additional butt weld imperfections that require
some comment.

Excessive penetration (Excess penetration bead)

Excess weld metal protruding through the root of a fusion (butt) weld made from one Fig.1. Excess penetration
side only.
With pipe welding this type of imperfection may cause effects in the fluid flow that can
cause erosion and/or corrosion problems.

Common causes
Penetration becomes excessive when the joint gap is too large, the root faces are too
small, the heat input to the joint is too high or a combination of these causes.

Acceptance
The criteria which sets the level of acceptable penetration depends primarily on the application code or specification.
BS 2971 requires that the 'penetration bead shall not exceed 3mm for pipes up to and including 150mm bore or 6mm for pipes over
150mm bore'.
BS 2633 gives specific limits for smaller diameters pipes, eg for pipe size 25-50mm the maximum allowed bore penetration is 2.5mm.
ASME B31.3 bases acceptability on the nominal thickness of the weld, for instance, allowing for a thickness range of 13-25mm up to
4mm of protrusion. However, ASME notes that 'more stringent criteria may be specified in the engineering design'.
BS EN 25817 relates the acceptable protrusion to the width of the under-bead as follows:

Severity of service Moderate, D Stringent, B

Limit (up to maximum) h 1mm + 1.2 b h 1mm + 0.3 b

Maximum 10 mm 3 mm

Where: h = height of excess & b = width of bead ( see Fig.1)

Avoidance
It is important to ensure that joint fit-up is as specified in the welding procedure. If welder technique is the problem then re training is
required.

Root concavity (suck-back; underwashing)

A shallow groove that may occur in the root of a butt weld. Fig.2. Root concavity
Common causes
Root concavity is caused by shrinkage of the weld pool in the through-thickness
direction of the weld. Melting of the root pass by the second pass can also produce root
concavity.
This imperfection is frequently associated with TIG welding with the most common
cause being poor preparation leaving the root gap either too small or, in some cases,
too large. Excessively high welding speeds make the formation of root concavity more
likely.

Acceptance
The root concavity may be acceptable. This will depend on the relevant standard being worked to. For example:
BS 2971 requires that:
a) there is complete root fusion
b) the thickness of the weld is not less than the pipe thickness.
ASME B31.3 requires that the 'total joint thickness, including weld reinforcement, must be greater than the weld thickness'.
BS EN 25817 sets upper limits related to the quality level, eg Moderate, D, h 1.5mm and for Stringent, B, h 0.5mm. Furthermore, a
smooth transition is required at the weld toes.
In effect the standards require that the minimum design throat thickness of the finished weldment is achieved. If the first two conditions
of acceptance are met but the weld face does not have a sufficiently high cap, additional weld metal may be deposited to increase the
throat.

http://www.twi.co.uk/content/jk68.html 12/9/2008
Job knowledge 68: A general review of the causes and acceptance of shape im... Page 2 of 3

Avoidance
It is important to ensure that joint fit-up is as specified in the welding procedure and that the defined parameters are being followed. If
welder technique is the problem then retraining is required.

Fillet welded joints

This Section should be read in conjunction with Job Knowledge 66 Fillet welded joints - a review of the practicalities.

Excess convexity
This feature is also covered by the definition for excess weld metal, see Part 1, and may be Fig.3. Excess convexity
described as weld metal lying outside the plane joining the weld toes. Note that the term
'reinforcement', although used extensively in the ASME/AWS specifications is avoided in
Europe as it implies that excess metal contributes to the strength of the welded joint. This is
rarely the case.

Common causes
Poor technique and the deposition of large volumes of 'cold' weld metal.

Acceptance
The idealised design requirement of a 'mitre' fillet weld is often difficult to achieve, particularly
with manual welding processes.
BS EN 25817 acceptance is based on a mitre fillet weld shape with a specific design throat and
any excess weld metal is measured in relation to this mitre surface. The limits for this
imperfection relate the height of the excess metal to the width of the bead with maximum values ranging from 3mm for a stringent
quality level to 5mm for a moderate quality level. Surprisingly, there is no reference to a 'smooth transition' being required at the weld
toes for such weld shape.
AWS D1.1 also has limits relating width to acceptable excess as follows:

Width of weld face Maximum convexity

W 8mm 2mm

W <8 to W<25mm 3mm

W 25mm 5mm

Avoidance
Welder technique is the major cause of this problem and training may be required. It is also important to ensure that the parameters
specified in the welding procedures specification are adhered to.

Oversize fillet welds (welds with a throat larger than required by the design)
As discussed in Job Knowledge 66, oversize fillet welds can represent a significant additional Fig.4. Oversize fillet weld
cost and loss of productivity.

Common causes
There are some welding related causes, eg high welding current, slow travel speeds, and some
supervision related ( eg to be safe make this fillet bigger by x mm.)

Acceptance
BS EN 25817 notes that 'for many applications a throat thickness greater than the nominal one
may not be a reason for rejection'.
Where called for this standard has limits related to the actual throat ( eg for stringent quality
levels, the actual weld throat [a] may exceed the nominal (design) weld throat [h] by 1+0.15a
with a maximum of 3mm. For the moderate quality level the maximum limit for this feature is
5mm.

Avoidance
Adhere to the specified welding procedure and parameters and do not add to the specified weld size. Where possible mechanise the
welding operation.

Undersized fillet welds (fillet welds smaller than those specified)

Common causes Fig.5. Undersized fillet weld
The welding related causes are associated with high welding speeds and low welding currents.

Acceptance
It is normally assumed that fillet welds will be at least of the size specified. BS EN 25817 states
'a fillet weld with an apparent throat thickness smaller that that prescribed should not be
regarded as being imperfect if the actual throat thickness with a compensating greater depth of
penetration complies with the nominal value'. That is if we can be sure there is good penetration
the smaller fillet may be acceptable, however, this should be discussed with the designer of the
fabrication.

http://www.twi.co.uk/content/jk68.html 12/9/2008
Job knowledge 68: A general review of the causes and acceptance of shape im... Page 3 of 3

Quality levels
Imperfection: fillet weld
Moderate D Intermediate C Stringent B

having a throat Long imperfections NOT permitted NOT permitted

thickness smaller than
Short imperfections (see Fig.5) h 0.3mm+ 0.1 a
the nominal value
max 2mm max 1mm
Relying upon deep penetration to provide the required minimum design throat thickness can be difficult to justify. Penetration is a weld
characteristic that is hard to measure directly and reliance must be placed on the stringent control of both the welding process and the
welder. Manual welding can rarely be relied upon to provide the required consistency but it is an option with mechanised welding
systems.

Avoidance
Adhere to the specified welding procedure and parameters. Use sufficient current and appropriate travel speed. Where possible mechanise
the welding operation.
Asymmetric fillet weld (a fillet weld where the legs are of unequal length)
Common causes Fig.6. Asymmetric fillet weld
Due to incorrect electrode positioning or to gravity pulling the molten pool towards one face of
the joint. It is an mainly a problem with fillet welds made in the horizontal/vertical (PB)
position.

Acceptance
There are instances where asymmetry may be specified ( eg to place the toe stress
concentration in a particular region).
BS EN 25817 would, for a 10mm leg length fillet weld ( ie 7.1mm throat) allow a difference in
leg lengths of about 2.5mm at the stringent quality level and 3.4mm at the moderate quality
level. Acceptance is related to the throat thickness.
The consequence of this imperfection is a significant increase in weld volume. Provided the leg
length requirement is achieved there would not be a loss of strength. Perhaps this is why, in
other standards, a requirement is not specified and the acceptability is left to the inspection
personnel to make the 'engineering judgement'!

Poor fit-up
The most common imperfection is an excessive gap between the mating faces of the materials. Fig.7. Poor fit-up
Common causes
Poor workshop practice, poor dimensioning and tolerance dimensions on drawings.

Acceptance
A major problem with fillet welds is ensuring the gap between the components is within defined
limits. ISO 5817 specifies the acceptance criteria as follows:

Quality levels

Moderate D Intermediate C Stringent B

h 1mm + 0.3 a h 0.5mm + 0.2 a h 0.5mm + 0.1 a

max 4mm max 3mm max 2mm

Where h = fit-up gap and a = fillet weld design throat

Figure 7 shows that the gap results in a reduction in the leg length on the vertical plate and this, in turn, results in a reduction in the
throat thickness of the joint. A 10mm leg length fillet with a root gap of 3mm gives an effective leg of 7mm (a throat of 4.9mm instead
of the expected 7mm).
This discrepancy is addressed within AWS D1.1. which permits a root gap of up to 5mm for material thickness up to 75mm. However, 'if
the (joint) separation is greater than 2mm the leg of the fillet weld shall be increased by the amount of the root opening, or the
contractor shall demonstrate that the effective throat has been obtained'.
Copyright 2004 TWI Ltd

Information and advice from TWI and its partners are provided in good faith and based, where appropriate, on the best engineering knowledge available at the time and incorporated into TWI's website in accordance with TWI's ISO
9001:2000 accredited status. No warranty expressed or implied is given regarding the results or effects of applying information or advice obtained from the website, nor is any responsibility accepted for any consequential loss or
damage.

http://www.twi.co.uk/content/jk68.html 12/9/2008