0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
14 Ansichten1 Seite
1. An MRI scan is generally the preferred method for early detection of sacroiliitis as it can detect early cartilage and bone changes better than an X-ray, especially in young people. However, MRI is very costly.
2. While there are no definitive blood tests to diagnose ankylosing spondylitis (AS), tests like the ESR and CRP can help indicate inflammation and determine if back pain is caused by inflammation or other factors like strain, but may be influenced by other conditions.
3. The current diagnostic criteria for AS are called the modified New York criteria and require chronic low back pain along with limitations in spinal movement and either evidence of sacroiliitis on X-ray or
1. An MRI scan is generally the preferred method for early detection of sacroiliitis as it can detect early cartilage and bone changes better than an X-ray, especially in young people. However, MRI is very costly.
2. While there are no definitive blood tests to diagnose ankylosing spondylitis (AS), tests like the ESR and CRP can help indicate inflammation and determine if back pain is caused by inflammation or other factors like strain, but may be influenced by other conditions.
3. The current diagnostic criteria for AS are called the modified New York criteria and require chronic low back pain along with limitations in spinal movement and either evidence of sacroiliitis on X-ray or
1. An MRI scan is generally the preferred method for early detection of sacroiliitis as it can detect early cartilage and bone changes better than an X-ray, especially in young people. However, MRI is very costly.
2. While there are no definitive blood tests to diagnose ankylosing spondylitis (AS), tests like the ESR and CRP can help indicate inflammation and determine if back pain is caused by inflammation or other factors like strain, but may be influenced by other conditions.
3. The current diagnostic criteria for AS are called the modified New York criteria and require chronic low back pain along with limitations in spinal movement and either evidence of sacroiliitis on X-ray or
s imple anterior-posterior X-ray ('AP view') I the pelvis is usually sufficient for detection I sacroiliitis. However, such an X-ray can sometimes be normal or show only equivocal (unclear) changes in very early stages I the disease (when the structural changes in the joints are still mostly limited o the joint lining (synovial membrane) and the cartilage). In this situation, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, possibly enhanced by the injection I a chemical called gadolinium, appears o be the method I choice for the early detection I sacroiliitis. MRI can also be used for early detection I inflammation (enthesitis) at other sites, because it can show the early changes in cartilage and the underlying bone. Moreover, unlike X-rays, MRI uses no ionizing radiation and is therefore a useful ool, especially in young people, but it is very costly. The use I MRI has led o a decreasing use I another radiographic imaging method called computed omography (CT) o detect sacroiliitis. CT provides a better but costlier detailing I bone and joint changes than a conventional X-ray, and is not commonly needed in the diagnosis I AS. Moreover, there is greater radiation exposure from CT than conventional X-ray I the pelvis. Laboraory findings Laboraory tests may not be I much help, and there is no single blood test that can specifically diagnose AS, i. e. there is no diagnostic or confirmaory test. However, some blood tests may contribute o the diagnosis I the disease, or correlate with its severity or clinical presentation. A simple but non-specific blood test called an ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) is one I the indicaors I inflammation. This test may help o detect the presence I severe inflammation, and may be I some use in determining, for example, whether the back pain is the result I infla mmation or is the more common mechanical or nonspecific CH2 H C CH3 CH3 I back pain or strain. However, less than 70% I people with AS have a raised ESR value, even when there is active inflammation. Moreover, this test is influenced by a variety I other facors, such as anemia, age, body, weight, pregnancy, and the sex I the individual tested. In a normal young man the ESR is usually less than 20 mm. Another test I inflammation is called CRP (C-reactive protein); this is less likely o be influenced by extraneous facors. There is no association with a blood test called rheumaoid facor (associated with rheumaoid arthritis) or antinuclear antibodies (associated with lupus). Therefore, AS and related spondyloarthropathies are sometimes listed under the term seronegative spondyloarthritis. Laboraory analysis I the joint (synovial) fluid obtained by joint aspiration (arthrocentesis) or biopsy (obtained by a needle or by arthroscopy via an instrument called arthroscope) does not markedly distinguish AS from other inflammaory rheumatic diseases. The possible use I HLA-B27 as an aid o diagnosis is discussed in Chapter 16. New York criteria The current criteria for the diagnosis I AS, known as the modified New York criteria, are shown in Table 2. Table 2 The generally accepted criteria for AS (modified New York criteria) 1 2 3 4 Low back pain I at least 3 month's duration improved by exercise and not relieved by rest Limitation I lumber spinal motion in sagittal (sideways) and frontal (forward and backward) planes Chest expansion decreased relative o normal values for the same sex and age Bilateral sacroillitis grade 2-4 or unilateral sacroiliitis grade 3 or 4 Definite AS if criterion 4 and any one I the other criteria is fulfilled. Note: These are classification criteria used for case definition and are primarily designed for research purposes. Other causes I back pain There are many possible cause I back pain, but by far the most common is mechanical deterioration I the spine. This can take many forms, but is Iten related o the intervertebral