USPS LABEL - STAN J. CATERBONE MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Re NOISE TOO LOUD - NOTICE OF APPEAL FOR TRIAL DE NOVO February 18, 2017

Stan J.
Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-528-2200
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

MAJISTERIAL DISTRICT JUDGE ADAM J. WITKONIS - MDJ-02-1-01
___________________________________________________
Stanley J. Caterbone :
DEFENDANT : MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016
:
:
NOTICE OF APPEAL FOR TRIAL DE NOVO
AND NOW, on this 18th day of February 2017, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE, appearing pro se,
do hereby file this NOTICE OF APPEAL FOR TRIAL DE NOVO TO THE TRAIL COURT FINDING
OF GUILTY ON FEBRUARY 13, 2017 AT THE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURT, NAMED ABOVE, FOR
THE CHARGE OF LO-198-4 (LEAD) NOISE TO LOUD. ATTACHED ARE THE FOLLOWING:
1. MOTION TO DISMISS
2. IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION
I, Stanley J. Caterbone, do hereby request the court to extend in writing in a timely
manner the Court's decision on the IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION, and to the extend
necessary any filing fees that are required for the above NOTICE OF APPEAL FOR TRIAL DE
NOVO. I would also request from the PRESIDENT JUDGE OF THE LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF
COMMON PLEAS, a waiver for the NEW CELL PHONE AND ELECTRONICS POLICY, being that I,
Stanley J. Caterbone, has many current cases before this court, as a pro se litibgant and the
restriction would bear an unfair and prejudicial burden to all litigation before this COURT.
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page 1 of 90

22 Saturday February 18, 2017
Dated February 18, 2017
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
717-528-2200
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and
publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud
within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via
South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the
truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public
corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications
are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a
member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County
and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture
from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?
ACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT
OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL
LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for
Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle
Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.; Case No. 16-cv-
49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR
HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-
0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015;
16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472 INJUNCTION re Pain
Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case No. 16-10157
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page 2 of 90

22 Saturday February 18, 2017
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page 3 of 90 Saturday February 18, 2017

U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE
LANCASTER DISTRICT
COUNTY COURTOFOF
PENNSYLVANIA
COMMON PLEAS
NOTICE OF APPEAL FOR TRIAL DE NOVO
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
for the THIRD CIRCUIT
Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief

In re: Stanley Caterbone )
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(E.D.Pa. No. 2-16-mc-00049) )
)
)
v. )
) No. MJ-02-02101-NT-0001214-2016
)
)
)
)
AFFIDAVIT ACCOMPANYING MOTION

FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Affidavit in Support of Motion Instructions
I swear or affirm under penalty of perjury Complete all questions in this application and
that, because of my poverty, I cannot prepay then sign it. Do not leave any blanks: if the
the docket fees of my appeal or post a bond for answer to a question is "0," "none," or "not
them. I believe I am entitled to redress. I swear applicable (N/A)," write that response. If you
or affirm under penalty of perjury under need more space to answer a question or to
United States laws that my answers on this explain your answer, attach a separate sheet of
form are true and correct. (28 U.S.C. 1746; paper identified with your name, your case's
18 U.S.C. 1621.) docket number, and the question number.
xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Stanley J. Caterbone August
February 31,
18,2016
2017
Signed: _____________________________ Date: _____________________________
December 21, 2016
My issues on appeal are:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
See Preceding Paragraph in THIRD CIRCUIT FULLY COMPLETED AFFIDAVIT OF
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
POVERTY of August 31, 2016.
czfbzgfzddvdvd
Case No. 16-3284
16-3283 In Forma Pauperis
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page
Page11
10
4 of 90
197
198 Wednesday August 18,
Saturday February 31, 2017
2016
1. For both you and your spouse estimate the average amount of money received from each
of the following sources during the past 12 months. Adjust any amount that was received
weekly, biweekly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually to show the monthly rate. Use
gross amounts, that is, amounts before any deductions for taxes or otherwise.
Income source Average monthly Amount expected next

amount during the past month
12 months
You Spouse You Spouse
Employment $ $ $ $
Self-employment $ $ $ $
Income from real property (such as $ $ $ $
rental income)
Interest and dividends $ $ $ $
Gifts $ $ $ $
Alimony $ $ $ $
Child support $ $ $ $
Retirement (such as social security, $ $ $ $
pensions, annuities, insurance)
Disability (such as social security, $ 1357.00 $ $ 1357.00 $
insurance payments)
Unemployment payments $ $ $ $
Public-assistance (such as welfare) $ $ $ $
Other (specify): $ $ $ $
Total monthly income: $ $ $ $

1357.00 1357.00
2. List your employment history for the past two years, most recent employer first. (Gross
monthly pay is before taxes or other deductions.)
Employer Address Dates of employment Gross

monthly pay
None Pro Se Litigation $
czfbzgfzddvdvd
Case No. 16-3284
Page12
11
5 of 90
197
2016
$
$
3. List your spouse's employment history for the past two years, most recent employer first.
(Gross monthly pay is before taxes or other deductions.)
Employer Address Dates of employment Gross

monthly pay
$
$
$
4. How much cash do you and your spouse have? $________
Below, state any money you or your spouse have in bank accounts or in any other
financial institution.
Financial Institution Type of Account Amount you have Amount your

spouse has
Members1st checking $ 9,200.00 $
TD Ameritrade Money Market 13,000.00
$$7,000.00 $
$ $
If you are a prisoner, you must attach a statement certified by the appropriate institutional
officer showing all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months in your
institutional accounts. If you have multiple accounts, perhaps because you have been in
multiple institutions, attach one certified statement of each account.
5. List the assets, and their values, which you own or your spouse owns. Do not list clothing
and ordinary household furnishings.
Home Other real estate Motor vehicle #1

(Value) $ 20,000.00 (Value) $ (Value) $ -10,000.00
1/4 Interest 1250 Fremont St Make and year: Reposession
czfbzgfzddvdvd
Case No. 16-3284
Page13
12
6 of 90
197
2016
2004 HYUNDAI SANTA FE $4,000.00 SANTA FE
Model:
NO LOANS
Registration #:
Motor vehicle #2 Other assets Other assets

(Value) $ (Value) $ (Value) $
Make and year:
Model:
Registration #:
6. State every person, business, or organization owing you or your spouse money, and the
amount owed.
Person owing you or your spouse Amount owed to you Amount owed to your
money spouse
Accounts Receivables - Exhibit $ 434,327.00 $
$ $
$ $
$ $
7. State the persons who rely on you or your spouse for support.
Name [or, if a minor (i.e., underage), initials only] Relationship Age
czfbzgfzddvdvd
Case No. 16-3284
Page14
13
7 of 90
197
2016
8. Estimate the average monthly expenses of you and your family. Show separately the
amounts paid by your spouse. Adjust any payments that are made weekly, biweekly,
quarterly, semiannually, or annually to show the monthly rate.
You Your Spouse

Rent or home-mortgage payment (including lot rented for $ 300.00 $
mobile home)
Are real estate taxes included? Yes No
Is property insurance included? Yes No
Utilities (electricity, heating fuel, water, sewer, and telephone) $ 510.00 $
Home maintenance (repairs and upkeep) $ 300.00 $
Food $ 200.00 $
Clothing $ 50.00 $
Laundry and dry-cleaning $ $
Medical and dental expenses $ 100.00 $
Transportation (not including motor vehicle payments) $ 100.00 $
Recreation, entertainment, newspapers, magazines, etc. 50.00
$ 300.00 $
Insurance (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage payments)
Homeowner's or renter's: $ 30.00 $
Life: $ $
Health: $ 145.00 $
Motor vehicle: $ 0.00 $
Other: $ 200.00 $
Taxes (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage $ $
payments) (specify):
Installment payments
Motor Vehicle: $ $
Credit card (name): $ $
Department store (name): $ $
Other: $ $
Alimony, maintenance, and support paid to others $ $
czfbzgfzddvdvd
Case No. 16-3284
Page15
14
8 of 90
197
2016
Regular expenses for operation of business, profession, or $ $
farm (attach detailed statement)
Other (specify): $ $
Total monthly expenses: 1,625.00 $
$ 2,432.00
9. Do you expect any major changes to your monthly income or expenses or in your assets
or liabilities during the next 12 months?
Yes No If yes, describe on an attached sheet.
10. Have you paid or will you be paying an attorney any money for services in
connection with this case, including the completion of this form? Yes No
If yes, how much? $ ____________

If yes, state the attorney's name, address, and telephone number:
11. Have you paid-or will you be paying-anyone other than an attorney (such as a paralegal
or a typist) any money for services in connection with this case, including the completion
of this form? Yes No
If yes, how much? $ ____________

If yes, state the person's name, address, and telephone number:
12. Provide any other information that will help explain why you cannot pay the docket fees
for your appeal. In Chapter 11 Reorganization Case No. 17-10615 there are listed approximatley
$140,000.00 in unsecured liabilities, the majority of which is the result of 1987
See Preceding Paragraph - AFFIDAVIT
claims of violations THAT
of civil rights, COMPLIES
anti-trust, WITH
public corruption, RULE
etc., 24(A)
stemming from
(1) the 1987 FEDERAL WHISTLEBLOWING ACTIVITIES, which began in June of 1987.
Attached is the RERORGANIZATION AND DISCLOSURE PLAN ALREADY DOCKET
IN THE ABOVE CHAPTER 11 CASE.
13. State the [city and state] of your legal residence.
Lancaster, Pennsylvania
XXXXXX
669-2163
717 _______________
Your daytime phone number: (____) 598-2200
58
Your age: ________ 16
Your years of schooling: ________
0959
[Last four digits of] your social-security number: _______
czfbzgfzddvdvd
Case No. 16-3284
Page16
15
9 of 90
197
2016
Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112143900 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/02/2015
! " #
$ " # % & ' ( " )( ))
! " # $ % & ' $$ !
( )* # " + # " , + ( - ./*0

(* ) + + + , +
( - .) ) /) +% *"
& ( +0
( ) * *+ .
1 ' 2 3 - 45* **0 67
( ). # " + ' $$ ! $ $1 (
8 * .//6 " ( -* .//4
1 . 2 0 2#
$ + 1 . 3 4 0
' 2 37-7 -.6 0/
' 1
1 ' . ./*0 2 37 .90 77- .7
5 "
czfbzgfzddvdvd
Case No. 16-3284
Page17
16
10of
of198
197
2016
COLLUSION by the Lancaster City Police Department Cost Me $16,000 Cash In a Few Weeks
%
!"" # $
&! ! '" !
((( &&" " ! & )#

# *& !" #
# +$ ,-.+
/ ! )/ $
/ "" / '0 " #&!
!!
# * (#& #
1 ) "" # " ! -2..-+.-32.4 567$,7- --8
"
# ! $ " ! % " & % % ' ( ) &" % !

' *+,-, ! " ! ) ) ' ! !! & . '
( & " % / % % ' ) % $ ' ( ) ' % ! / !
" ) ) " ' # 0 , / % !'
( " % " ' " . 1" ' " %. & ( % ! !!
"
& ! ) ' $ & ! '. ) !!' 2 % 2 3" )
" ' & ( % " % . & / " !! " " 4.
' !! ( & " % ) % % ) ! ' !! & % ! /
! ! ! " $ % ) " ' ) " ) % % ! ' '
$" ! & $ % / ' " " !! 5 % / '! . 1" '
" %. & % $ " 4 ' ) " % % $ " ' $ " )
" 63 7 % " ! . ! & ( ' ( % " $ 4
" & % % / % / !! 8 9 % / ) /.
: ) !' '! % ( ) $" " ( /" ' ! !

; !' 6 . & " %% !
( %% % " ! . 1" ! " &
!% ( < ! " ) % *+,-, ! $ ! ( 3
. & %% ! ) !! " . 1" ; !' 6 .
! % / " )$ % . =' 6 . > ; 0 4
? ? $ ( 4 $ % ' / , ( <" . =' 6< . =
' /" " & !! % ' ( 4' % $( 4 .
& " % ! " 8 /" =@A5,+B $ " ) A "!8 , !

. 1" ( !! % $ 6 . ! % / " /. !' A "!8 ! %
) " ) ) " / " $ & " ; !' " ) ! ( ( & " % /
" A "!8 4 ' " " & " % % " " )
! . & / " (! ' ) % / ' ! / % / "
!! " $ " $ " " / / ' " ) ' 4 . & $
Letter to Chris Reeser re ALLSTATE

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 CLAIM
NOTICE OF Page11
APPEAL Page 1 of 90
4 Thursday
Saturday October18,
February 6, 2017
2016
% ) " ! /' " " %% $ " .
=' 6 . : % ' ' ! " ) " . &

% " " (! ' ' % !! ) ' " " ! 4 )
( % % % ! % $ " % ) ' % !! .
1" ' " ( % % ! ! / / . + $& !' " / ) "
" !).
1" ( / ' ! !! ; !' 63 3 . .
0 !! " !' " !) " '. ) / # 4 ) ," ) % '

/ ! ' ) ' % 5- & % % % " " !
) " ! 4 !' $ !% " ! ) % % " "! % ! "
( / ! / !! ) ' % " % " $ ' ) ( / ! %
% % $" " $ !% ( " ) ' !) . " % ) / &
% " " ! % ( " 3" & ! ) " " ! 4 / / /
( / % 4 " . & " ) % " 5 4= / ,)) ) " " ))
"
% ( " % % % < ' % % %$ "
" 4 + . <6 . % " % ' % " ) C*& ,
& ) ; !' 6 . . 0 !! D % ' / , ( "
$ ! ) 4 /! + "= ' '! . & % !'
) % ' ' C*& , % % ! " ! ! $" " % %
' ! '.
0 !! ) & " % ! !' % % " " % " "

% '% % " " ! ! ( ! % " *++ ,1 =- ) %% " "
"' ! ! ! ' . 1 % ' *++ ,1 ) % " " $ ! )
' ! / . 1 % ' & ) % $ " ' ( 4 " " " 4 ! % ) '
"
( % " ! % ( " % ' ) " . + $
C*& , ) / % $ " ! % $ ) / " ! ( '
" ! ! % " + ! ! - " ! ( % " ) " & ! /
" ' $ " " ' ! . & $ !! ! " ! "
" % ' / % ! % ( . $ & ! 6 .
" ) " ) . & ! " % ( =,1&,+ ,5 ,+1&+: + * ) !! ) ' %
) % ! " & !' ! / / % " ) " ' !
" ! " %. 9 : :; 9 9 <; 9
:: <; ;
($ ' ' ! $ ' #" ! ! ( )) =! "' 67$,7- -- (

( / 67$,7- / )) =! "' 6>$,-- -- ? ' ,--2 $
6.+$--- -- ! # / / " .-- / ? ) !""! & ? "" ? /! $
(/!#/ ! " / 6.,$3--$ ! "" )$ @ ! A

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 CLAIM
NOTICE OF Page12
APPEAL Page 2 of 90
4 Thursday
Saturday October18,
February 6, 2017
2016
) >$ ,-.+
/ ! $ '? "" # 1 " ! -2..-+.-32.4
"
, % ' / " " 4 % % ) % ' *+,-, !

E " % % . : # " F / G % $ !% " ( 5* &5* %
$ !% !' " #&, " . + $ " % % !' ( 6 . ( ) !' '
% " $ 0&+ ,0 / ' $" " " 6 . . & $
# # ' % 5 % % " % ! ) 6 . . & " ) %
! ) " = ) - )$ ( ) & " % ' ) ! %
!! % $ ! " 4 %. & $ / ' &= 1, 6 . 0 & 0&
,-*5 , 1 * =& * +*,: &1*= #5,A*+ + ?,5 1, *+ 1 * 1 =,+1 .
$ :! !&
%
!"" # $
&! ! '" !
((( &&" " ! & )#

# *& !" #

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 CLAIM
NOTICE OF Page13
APPEAL Page 3 of 90
4 Thursday
Saturday October18,
February 6, 2017
2016
9 9 9 9 < $ : 9 9
-BC.+CD---3 ??!# ? / ! # ! = # ! $ ! 9/! ! # !

? )) " C : 9 : 9 < : 9;
< % < E -BC.+CD---2+ :: :: 9 9 9 9
9/! ! # ! ? )) " + . 3< / ) .. < F ) #'

)) "H + . < 9? :! !#/ "" : H < 9?
:! !#/ "" : EH H << <
! !# ! !# ? + . < < ! ! ?
) E < < ,--3 ! E + . < / ) ..
)) "E 3<H < 9? :! !#/ "" : E 33H <
3 3 E
! !# ! " ! !# ? .+C# C.>3. 9 9

<
( " / ? '" ! !#! " # < G ,-.+C2+,

! / ' ) ! & : < (
'" ! ) + .< = : # '

! H + .< = : # ! ' "!# ) .H
+ . =1 H < =1 E 3 == !# ? 4 /" 4
) ! ? '" ! + . = "! ! ' & #'

H # ! H ? 4 /" 4 ..+2 ,-.+H + .
= H = E .+C.,.D "! ! ' H # ! ? ,-.+
: # ' ? " + . & 3< "! ! '

& #' H # ! ? ! !# ! H + . 3 H H
< & <
< F ) #' ? 9/ ! !# ? '" ! .+C.-.3>

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 CLAIM
NOTICE OF Page14
APPEAL Page 4 of 90
4 Thursday
Saturday October18,
February 6, 2017
2016
%
!"" # $
&! ! '" !
((( &&" " ! & )#
& **$ *+,-
. ! $ '/ "" # 0 " ! +1,,+-,+21,3
!"
#$ % & % ' % ( %% ) (% ( (
" % &% ( * + ( ! , (
" " (( - ( ( -,- ( 4 "" # " !

+1,,+-,+21,3 * " ' !"" # " ! ! / "! 5. /
**+ !"" $ & ,62,- 7 & **$ *+,-4
% $ ( " % $
." / 0 -
$ 8! !&
%
!"" # $
&! ! '" !
((( &&" " ! & )#

# 9& !" #
5 5
+:7,-7;+++2 //!# / . ! # ! < # ! $ ! 5.! ! # ! / )) " 7
8 5 8 5 = 8 5> 1 ( 1 ? +:7,-7;+++1- 88
88 5 5 5 5
5.! ! # ! / )) " ! 2 1 5/ 8! !#. "" 8 3 1
5/ 8! !#. "" 8 ?3 3 11 1
! !# ! !# / ! 2 1 3 413 1 5/ 8!
!#. "" 8 ? 443 1 4 4
( " . / '" ! !#! " # = @ *+,-71-* ! ) ,
! - &! - %! & 8 = (
'" ! ) ! - ! 2 5. 3 1 5. ? 4 55 !# / 3 ." 3
) ! / '" ! / 3 ." 3 ,,-1 *+,-3 ! 2
5 3 5
8 # ' / " ! 2 4 3 3 1 !# 1
= A ) #' / 5. ! !# / '" ! ! 2

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 CLAIM
NOTICE OF Page15
APPEAL Page 1 of
of95
90 August 18,
2016
Stan J. Caterbone andCOLLUSION
Advanced Media
by theGroup
Lancaster City Police Department Cost
220MeStone
$16,000
Hill Cash
Road,InConestoga
a Few Weeks
PA
Letter
2 Harleysville
to ChrisInsurance
Reeser reClaims
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 ALLSTATE
PaidOF
NOTICE CLAIM Page
Page16
APPEAL Page 21of
of95
7
90 Monday
Saturday August 18,
February 22, 2017
2016
Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group COLLUSION by the Lancaster City Police Department Cost
220MeStone
$16,000
Hill Cash
Road,InConestoga
a Few Weeks
PA
SCHEDULE OF ARTICLES STOLEN, DAMAGED OR DESTROYED

k In Progress Report As Of October 12, 2005
INSURED: Stanley Caterbone
CLAIM NUMBER: M0-599782
ITEM WHERE DATE COST TO COST TO DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ALLOWED

(Give Full Description) PURCHASED PURCHAS REPLACE REPAIR CLAIMED
ED
Dragon Naturally Speaking EBay Auction Site 25-Feb-05 55.00
xPinnacle Video Capture Radio Shack, Willow Street, PA Feb 69.99
xNEW DAZZLE DIGITAL VIDEO EBay Auction Harold Bautista 6-Jun-05 78.99
CREATOR
LeadTech Video Capture Cyberwarehouse, Lancaster, PA 14-Sep-05 169.99
Creative MP3 Player Radio Shack, Plantation, Florida 27-Apr-05 529.99
xPlantronics Bluetooth Headset Cingular, Park City, Lancaster, PA 28-May-05 85.00
Motorola Bluetooth Headset

Online Prescription Glasses Glasses Direct, Online Merchant 22-Feb-05 159.99
Wal-Mart Prescription Glasses Wal-Mart, Kennett, MO 25-Jul-05 308.00 350

Motorola Cell Phone
LESS
DEDUCTIBLE
TOTAL $1,456.95
State law requires us to include the following statement - Any person who knowingly files a statement of claim containing any
false or misleading information is subject to criminal and civil penalties.
_________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________
SIGN HERE
C-I 139nj (4101)
2 Harleysville
Letter to ChrisInsurance
Reeser reClaims
ALLSTATE
Paid CLAIM Page
Page32of
of95
7 Monday August 22, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group COLLUSION by the Lancaster City Police Department Cost
220MeStone
$16,000
Hill Cash
Road,InConestoga
a Few Weeks
PA
SCHEDULE OF ARTICLES STOLEN, DAMAGED OR DESTROYED Page 2
INSURED: Stanley Caterbone
CLAIM NUMBER: M0-599782
ITEM WHERE DATE COST TO COST TO DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ALLOWED

(Give Full Description) PURCHASED PURCHAS REPLACE REPAIR CLAIMED
ED
CD Rom Drive HP Desktop Cyberwarehouse, Lancaster, PA 20-May-05 129.99
Computer
AT&T Blackberry PDA EBay Auction Site 6-Apr-05 149.99
HP LaserJet 6 Toner EBay Auction Site 7-Apr-05 33.07
Compaq Keyboard Cyberwarehouse, Lancaster, PA 20-May-05 49.99
New DeLorme Earthmate GPS www.qpsworldsupply.com 25-Feb-05 126.90

Circuit Board for Magic Chef Range Willow Street, PA 25-Apr-05 69.99
Outdoor Table Broken on Oct 9, 2005 Kmart, Willow Street, PA May, 2000 200.00
2 Carton Marlboro Lights from Online 33.95

mailbox
-+
793.88
LESS
DEDUCTIBLE
TOTAL $2,913.90
State law requires us to include the following statement - Any person who knowingly files a statement of claim containing any
false or misleading information is subject to criminal and civil penalties.
_________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________
SIGN HERE
C-I 139nj (4101)
2 Harleysville
Letter to ChrisInsurance
Reeser reClaims
ALLSTATE
Paid CLAIM Page
Page43of
of95
7 Monday August 22, 2016

Advanced Media
by theGroup
220MeStone
$16,000
Hill Cash
Road,InConestoga
a Few Weeks
PA
Letter
2 Harleysville
to ChrisInsurance
Reeser reClaims
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 ALLSTATE
PaidOF
NOTICE CLAIM Page
Page19
APPEAL Page 54of
of95
7
90 Monday
Saturday August 18,
February 22, 2017
2016
Advanced Media
by theGroup
220MeStone
$16,000
Hill Cash
Road,InConestoga
a Few Weeks
PA
Letter
2 Harleysville
to ChrisInsurance
Reeser reClaims
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 ALLSTATE
PaidOF
NOTICE CLAIM Page
Page20
APPEAL Page 65of
of95
7
90 Monday
Saturday August 18,
February 22, 2017
2016
Stan J. Caterbone and COLLUSION
Advanced Media
by the
Group
220MeStone
$16,000
Hill Cash
Road,InConestoga
a Few Weeks
PA
Letter
2 Harleysville
to ChrisInsurance
Reeser reClaims
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 ALLSTATE
Paid CLAIM
NOTICE Page
Page21
OF APPEAL Page 76of
of
of95
7
90 Monday
Saturday August 18,
February 22, 2017
2016
Advanced Media
by theGroup
220MeStone
$16,000
Hill Cash
Road,InConestoga
a Few Weeks
PA
Letter
2 Harleysville
to ChrisInsurance
Reeser reClaims
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 ALLSTATE
PaidOF
NOTICE CLAIM Page
Page22
APPEAL Page 87of
of95
7
90 Monday
Saturday August 18,
February 22, 2017
2016
! " # $" % & ' ($ $ % " $ ) * + ", $ ) * '

- $ .* / % " " $ , + ", $ 0
4$$ . 6$
! ""
# $ %&
6$ !*
' &
( & $-7 "1 " -1 )
$ $ * "$ '
* # $ * "$ " %
+ , -. !
*
* / 0 1 "
! & / %
1 *
. $ 2 *%
' . 3$ !
( & $ 4 5
/ 1 2
Letter to Chris Reeser re ALLSTATE CLAIM Page 9 of 95 August 22, 2016

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
B25A (Official Form 25A) (12/11)
United States Bankruptcy Court

EASTERN District of PENNSYLVANIA
In re , STANLEY J. CATERBONE Case No. 17-10615REF

Debtor Small Business Case under Chapter 11
STAN J. CATERBONES PLAN OF REORGANIZATION, DATED FEBRUARY 7, 2017
ARTICLE I
SUMMARY
This Plan of Reorganization (the Plan) under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code The Code)
proposes to pay creditors of STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE DEBTOR (the Debtor) from PROCEEDS
FROM THE MYRIAD CLAIMS OF VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS, VIOLATIONS OF ANTI-TRUST,
VIOLATIONS OF THE RICO STATUTE, FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT RE ISC, INSURANCE CLAIMS
OF VANDALISM AND THEFTS, DAMAGES FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING, ETC., ALL OF WHICH HAVE
BEEN ACCRUING SINCE 1987. THESE CLAIMS ARE CURRENTLY IN LITIGATION IN FEDERAL
AND STATE COURTS. THESE CLAIMS HAVE ARE ALL WELL SUBSTANTIATED AND ARE
SUPPORTED WITH IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE IN THE FORM OF DOCUMENTS, AUDIO
RECORDINGS, AND VIDEOS. HOWEVER DUE TO THE HISORY OF STAN J. CATERBONE, THISE
CLAIMS HAVE BEEN POLITICIZED SINCE 1987 AND THE FBI COINTELPRO'S PRGOGRAM HAS
BEEN USED TO OBSTRUCT EFFORTS IN ALL OF THE COURTS. IT IS HIGHLY PREJUDICIAL AND
CRIMINAL TO ALLOW THIS CONDUCT TO PROCEED AND NOT ALLOW THIS REORGANIZATION
PLAN TO BE CONSUMATED FOR THE SAKE OF THE CREDITORS, WHO HAVE BEEN UNJUSTLY
PUNISHED JUST AS THE DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE. MANY OF THSES CASES HAVE RESULTED
IN ORDERS GRANTING PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE UNTIL THE
UNDOINFLUENCE, COMPUTER HACKING, HARASSMENT, VADALISM, ETC., IS REMOVED FROM
THE DEBTORS LIFE SO THAT THESE CLAIMS CAN BE FULLY LITIGATED WITHOUT
INTERRUPTION OR SETTLEMENTS REACHED. ALL OF THE USECURED CLAIMS IN THIS CASE
HAVE BEEN SPECIFICALLY DISPUTED DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE CLAIMS WERE THE DIRECT
RESULT OF THE VIOLATIONS OUTLINED HEREIN AND ARE NOT LEGALLY THE DEBT OF THE
DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE. IN ADDITION DUE TO THE COMPUTER HACKING TO THE
DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, MOST IF NOT ALL FINANCIAL ACCOUNTS WERE AND ARE
SUBJECT TO ERRORS AND/OR FALSE LEDGER BALANCES. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF
ACTIVE COURT CASES AND JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS WHICH SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS THE
PRECEEDING:
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of
Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149;
03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No.
16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for
Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States,
et.al.; Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288;
06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-
1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint
against Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 1 of 66 February 7, 2017

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for
Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary
Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA
2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of
2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472
INJUNCTION re Pain Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167;
06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case
No. 16-10157
This Plan has no secured claims; and one class of of unsecured claims; and one class of
equity security holders. Unsecured creditors holding allowed claims will receive distributions, which the
proponent of this Plan has valued at approximately 100 cents on the dollar with accruing interest.
This Plan also provides for the payment of administrative and priority claims [if payment is not in full on
the effective date of this Plan with respect to any such claim (to the extent permitted by the Code or the
claimants agreement), identify such claim and briefly summarize the proposed treatment.]
All creditors and equity security holders should refer to Articles III through VI of this Plan for
information regarding the precise treatment of their claim. A disclosure statement that provides more
detailed information regarding this Plan and the rights of creditors and equity security holders has been
circulated with this Plan. Your rights may be affected. You should read these papers carefully and
discuss them with your attorney, if you have one. (If you do not have an attorney, you may
wish to consult one.)
ARTICLE II
CLASSIFICATION OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS
2.01 Class 1. All allowed claims entitled to priority under 507 of the Code (except
administrative expense claims under 507(a)(2), [gap
period claims in an involuntary case under 507(a)(3),] and
priority tax claims under 507(a)(8)).
2.02 Class 2. The claim of , to the extent allowed

as a secured claim under 506 of the Code.
[Add other classes of secured creditors, if any. Note: Section
1129(a)(9)(D) of the Code provides that a secured tax claim which
would otherwise meet the description of a priority tax claim under
507(a)(8) of the Code is to be paid in the same manner and over
the same period as prescribed in 507(a)(8).]
2.03 Class 3. All unsecured claims allowed under 502 of the Code.
[Add other classes of unsecured claims, if any.]
2.04 Class 4. Equity interests of the Debtor. [If the Debtor is an individual,
change this heading to The interests of the individual Debtor in
property of the estate.]

ARTICLE III
TREATMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE CLAIMS,
U.S. TRUSTEES FEES, AND PRIORITY TAX CLAIMS
3.01 Unclassified Claims. Under section 1123(a)(1), administrative expense claims, [gap
period claims in an involuntary case allowed under 502(f) of the Code,] and priority tax claims are not in
classes.
3.02 Administrative Expense Claims. Each holder of an administrative expense claim allowed
under 503 of the Code [, and a gap claim in an involuntary case allowed under 502(f) of the Code,]
will be paid in full on the effective date of this Plan (as defined in Article VII), in cash, or upon such other
terms as may be agreed upon by the holder of the claim and the Debtor. THERE ARE NO
ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENSES CHARGED TO THIS PLAN, ONLY PRO SE BILLINGS, WHICH WILL BE
BILLED TO OTHER CASES INVOLVIING OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE CLAIMS.
3.03 Priority Tax Claims. Each holder of a priority tax claim will be paid [specify terms of
treatment consistent with 1129(a)(9)(C) of the Code]. There are no tax claims in this case.
3.04 United States Trustee Fees. All fees required to be paid by 28 U.S.C. 1930(a)(6) (U.S.
Trustee Fees) will accrue and be timely paid until the case is closed, dismissed, or converted to another
chapter of the Code. Any U.S. Trustee Fees owed on or before the effective date of this Plan will be paid
on the effective date.
ARTICLE IV
TREATMENT OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS UNDER THE PLAN
4.01 Claims and interests shall be treated as follows under this Plan: Claims will have
equity interest in the federal and state civil actions taken to secure settlements for the above
mentioned violations; which will fund this proposed reorganization plan.
ALL UNSECURED CLAIMS ARE UNIMPAIRED AND WILL BE PAID IN FULL UPON THE
SETTELMENTS AS OUTLINED IN ARTICLE ONE THE SUMMARY.
ARTICLE V
ALLOWANCE AND DISALLOWANCE OF CLAIMS
5.01 Disputed Claim. A disputed claim is a claim that has not been allowed or disallowed [by a
final non-appealable order], and as to which either: (i) a proof of claim has been filed or deemed filed,
and the Debtor or another party in interest has filed an objection; or (ii) no proof of claim has been filed,
and the Debtor has scheduled such claim as disputed, contingent, or unliquidated. SEE ARTICLE ONE
SUMMARY FOR THE REASON WHY ALL UNSECURED CLAIMS ARE DISPUTED.
5.02 Delay of Distribution on a Disputed Claim. No distribution will be made on account of a

disputed claim unless such claim is allowed [by a final non-appealable order].
5.03 Settlement of Disputed Claims. The Debtor will have the power and authority to
settle and compromise a disputed claim with court approval and compliance with Rule 9019 of
the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

ARTICLE VI
PROVISIONS FOR EXECUTORY CONTRACTS AND UNEXPIRED LEASES
6.1 Assumed Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases.
(a) The Debtor assumes the following executory contracts and/or unexpired leases
effective upon the [Insert effective date of this Plan as provided in Article VII, the date of the entry of
the order confirming this Plan, or other applicable date]:
[List assumed executory contracts and/or unexpired leases.]
(b) The Debtor will be conclusively deemed to have rejected all executory contracts and/or
unexpired leases not expressly assumed under section 6.01(a) above, or before the date of the order
confirming this Plan, upon the [Insert effective date of this Plan, the date of the entry of the order
confirming this Plan, or other applicable date]. A proof of a claim arising from the rejection of an
executory contract or unexpired lease under this section must be filed no later than __________ (___)
days after the date of the order confirming this Plan.
ARTICLE VII
MEANS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN
[Insert here provisions regarding how the plan will be implemented as required under 1123(a)(5) of the
Code. For example, provisions may include those that set out how the plan will be funded, as well as who
will be serving as directors, officers or voting trustees of the reorganized debtor.]
This Plan of Reorganization (the Plan) under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code The Code)
proposes to pay creditors of STAN J. CATERBONE (the Debtor) from PROCEEDS FROM THE MYRIAD
CLAIMS OF VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS, VIOLATIONS OF ANTI-TRUST, VIOLATIONS OF THE
RICO STATUTE, FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT RE ISC, INSURANCE CLAIMS OF VANDALISM AND
THEFTS, DAMAGES FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING, ETC., ALL OF WHICH HAVE BEEN ACCRUING
SINCE 1987. THESE CLAIMS ARE CURRENTLY IN LITIGATION IN FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS.
THESE CLAIMS HAVE ARE ALL WELL SUBSTANTIATED AND ARE SUPPORTED WITH
IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE IN THE FORM OF DOCUMENTS, AUDIO RECORDINGS, AND VIDEOS.
HOWEVER DUE TO THE HISORY OF STAN J. CATERBONE, THISE CLAIMS HAVE BEEN
POLITICIZED SINCE 1987 AND THE FBI COINTELPRO'S PRGOGRAM HAS BEEN USED TO
OBSTRUCT EFFORTS IN ALL OF THE COURTS. IT IS HIGHLY PREJUDICIAL AND CRIMINAL TO
ALLOW THIS CONDUCT TO PROCEED AND NOT ALLOW THIS REORGANIZATION PLAN TO BE
CONSUMATED FOR THE SAKE OF THE CREDITORS, WHO HAVE BEEN UNJUSTLY PUNISHED JUST
AS THE DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE. MANY OF THSES CASES HAVE RESULTED IN ORDERS
GRANTING PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE UNTIL THE UNDOINFLUENCE,
COMPUTER HACKING, HARASSMENT, VADALISM, ETC., IS REMOVED FROM THE DEBTORS LIFE
SO THAT THESE CLAIMS CAN BE FULLY LITIGATED WITHOUT INTERRUPTION OR SETTLEMENTS
REACHED. ALL OF THE USECURED CLAIMS IN THIS CASE HAVE BEEN SPECIFICALLY DISPUTED
DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE CLAIMS WERE THE DIRECT RESULT OF THE VIOLATIONS
OUTLINED HEREIN AND ARE NOT LEGALLY THE DEBT OF THE DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE. IN
ADDITION DUE TO THE COMPUTER HACKING TO THE DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, MOST IF
NOT ALL FINANCIAL ACCOUNTS WERE AND ARE SUBJECT TO ERRORS AND/OR FALSE LEDGER
BALANCES. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF ACTIVE COURT CASES AND JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS
WHICH SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS THE PRECEEDING:

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of
Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149;
03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No.
16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for
Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States,
et.al.; Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288;
06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-
1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint
against Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for
Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary
Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA
2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of
2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472
INJUNCTION re Pain Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167;
06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case
No. 16-10157
ARTICLE VIII
GENERAL PROVISIONS
8.01 Definitions and Rules of Construction. The definitions and rules of construction set forth
in 101 and 102 of the Code shall apply when terms defined or construed in the Code are used in this
Plan, and they are supplemented by the following definitions: [Insert additional definitions if necessary].
THE PLAIN WILL FOLLOW THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEURE FOR FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS
AND WILL BE CONTRAINED TO THE OPINIONS AND ORDERS RESPECTIVELY. THE DEBTOR,
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, WILL BE THE SOLE ADMINISTRATOR.
8.02 Effective Date of Plan. The effective date of this Plan is the first business day following
the date that is fourteen days after the entry of the order of confirmation. If, however, a stay of the
confirmation order is in effect on that date, the effective date will be the first business day after the date
on which the stay of the confirmation order expires or is otherwise terminated.
8.03 Severability. If any provision in this Plan is determined to be unenforceable, the

determination will in no way limit or affect the enforceability and operative effect of any other provision of
this Plan.
8.04 Binding Effect. The rights and obligations of any entity named or referred to in this Plan
will be binding upon, and will inure to the benefit of the successors or assigns of such entity.
8.05 Captions. The headings contained in this Plan are for convenience of reference only and do
not affect the meaning or interpretation of this Plan.

[8.06 Controlling Effect. Unless a rule of law or procedure is supplied by federal law
(including the Code or the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure), the laws of the State of____________
govern this Plan and any agreements, documents, and instruments executed in connection with this Plan,
except as otherwise provided in this Plan.]
[8.07 Corporate Governance. [If the Debtor is a corporation include provisions required by
1123(a)(6) of the Code.]]
ARTICLE IX
DISCHARGE
[If the Debtor is not entitled to discharge under 11 U.S.C. 1141(d)(3) change this heading to
NO DISCHARGE OF DEBTOR.]
9.01. [Option 1 If Debtor is an individual and 1141(d)(3) is not applicable]

Discharge. Confirmation of this Plan does not discharge any debt provided for in this Plan until
the court grants a discharge on completion of all payments under this Plan, or as otherwise provided in
1141(d)(5) of the Code. The Debtor will not be discharged from any debt excepted from discharge under
523 of the Code, except as provided in Rule 4007(c) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.
[Option 2 -- If the Debtor is a partnership and section 1141(d)(3) of the Code

is not applicable]
Discharge. On the confirmation date of this Plan, the debtor will be discharged from any
debt that arose before confirmation of this Plan, subject to the occurrence of the effective date, to
the extent specified in 1141(d)(1)(A) of the Code. The Debtor will not be discharged from any
debt imposed by this Plan.

[Option 3 -- If the Debtor is a corporation and 1141(d)(3) is not applicable]

Discharge. On the confirmation date of this Plan, the debtor will be discharged from any
debt that arose before confirmation of this Plan, subject to the occurrence of the effective date, to
the extent specified in 1141(d)(1)(A) of the Code, except that the Debtor will not be discharged
of any debt: (i) imposed by this Plan; (ii) of a kind specified in 1141(d)(6)(A) if a timely complaint was
filed in accordance with Rule 4007(c) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure; or (iii) of a kind
specified in 1141(d)(6)(B).
[Option 4 If 1141(d)(3) is applicable]

No Discharge. In accordance with 1141(d)(3) of the Code, the Debtor will not receive
any discharge of debt in this bankruptcy case.

ARTICLE X
OTHER PROVISIONS
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 16-2513 is a
Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief that was filed in order to clear the way and have
the courts provide IMMEDIATE RELIEF from all illegal and criminal activities that are
OBSTRUCTION JUSTICE in order for the DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE from litigating
settlements of remedy, relief, and monetary awards which are the primary and only source of
funding for the reorganization plan. There are also a multitude of JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS,
both in the OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPLEALS AND IN
THE PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD relating to the same. The following is the
language used in the INJUNCTION:
I) TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 73 - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
(C) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge
of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible
commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation,
supervised release, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings; shall be
punished as provided in paragraph (3).
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF

The Plaintiff alleges that he has been a prisoner of the state since 1987, and that the activities
surrounding the PLAINTIFF'S life has escalated into a daily occurrence of assaults. Unfortunately while
the PLAINTIFF'S has made many in person complaints to just about every law enforcement agency, the
pleas for help and assistance have yielded nothing but more attacks to the PLAINTIFF'S person,
property, electronics, home, auto, reputation, intellectual property, and lastly his mental state-of-mind A
BRUTAL ARRAY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE. The PETITIONER has already made claims of
COINTELPRO-like tactics in his filings in the U.S.C.A. Case No. 15-3400 against these same said actors
and perpetrators. The PETITIONER will provide evidence to support this writ and offer a final remedy and
redress in accordance with federal law.
There are six essential prerequisites that a party must establish prior to obtaining a Preliminary
Emergency Injunction For Relief:
1. that the injunction is necessary to prevent immediate and irreparable harm that cannot be
adequately compensated by damages;
2. that greater injury would result from refusing an injunction than from granting it, and,
concomitantly, that issuance of an injunction will not substantially harm other interested parties in
the proceedings;
3. that a preliminary injunction will properly restore the parties to their status as it existed
immediately prior to the alleged wrongful conduct;
4. that the activity it seeks to restrain is actionable, that its right to relief is clear, and that the wrong
is manifest, or, in other words, that it is likely to prevail on the merits;
5. that the injunction it seeks is reasonably suited to abate the offending activity; and,
6. that a preliminary injunction will not adversely affect the public interest

RELIEF SOUGHT BY PLAINTIFF

The PLAINTIFF seeks immediate relief from the above in the form of sanctions and fines for those
guilty of extortion and embezzlement and those withholding accounts receivables. PLAINTIFF seeks
immediate relief from the law enforcement agencies that continue abuse of process. PLAINTIFF seeks
immediate relief from public officials for obstructing justice and due process. PLAINTIFF seeks relief, in
as much as the courts are able, with regards to the harassment and torture from those known of such
crimes. The Complainant seeks relief from stalking and harassing neighbors and requires law enforcement
to make sure households can identify all occupants and prove they are entitled to the lease and or deed.
Due to the actions and criminal activity of the above named DEFENDANTS, it is reasonable to prove that
every aspect of the PLAINTIFF'S life, is subject to undo influence; harassment; torture; obstruction; etc.
thus resulting in irreparable harm and injury. This situation and set of circumstances as outlined here, and
all previous filings; reports; and statements, is a prescription for only one endgame - death or suicide.
There is no life action or activity that is immune from this horrendous HATE CRIME. The precedent and
landmark elements that make this so appalling is that the Complainant has never done anything to set
these circumstances in motion but to be right regarding International Signal & Control back in 1987; as
well as many other proclamations and forecasts. That being said, it is also widely reported that many
Targeted Individuals and Victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control are lead to death and/or suicide. The
Lancaster Community-At-Large is guilty of creating; abetting; fostering; and executing this tragedy. The
fact that local; state; and federal law enforcement induce and encourage this environment of hate is
landmark.
The Courts must consider UNJUST ENRICHMENT in this case. (Wikipedia, The Free Dictionary by
FARLEX) - A general equitable principle that no person should be allowed to profit at another's expense
without making restitution for the reasonable value of any property, services, or other benefits that have
been unfairly received and retained. Although the unjust enrichment doctrine is sometimes referred to as
a quasi-contractual remedy, unjust enrichment is not based on an express contract. Instead, litigants
normally resort to the remedy of unjust enrichment when they have no written or verbal contract to
support their claim for relief. In such instances litigants ask a court to find a contractual relationship that
is implied in law, a fictitious relationship created by courts to do justice in a particular case.
The PLAINTIFF seeks a temporary injunction until a permanent resolution to ALL ISSUES
CONTAINED HEREIN are constructed and resolved in the myriad of civil actions pending before the courts
and those actions withdrawn without prejudice awaiting resolutions.
IRREPRABLE HARM
The irreparable harm and injure that has resulted from the above circumstances includes but is not
limited to the following:
Loss of personal property and real estate.

Loss of opportunity to secure personal property, business assets, and court related assets,
information, and evidence; including when sleeping (rape drug rohypnol).
Loss of protection from law enforcement at every level; local, state, and federal.
Loss of relationships including family; friends; and professional.
Loss of time and loss of life as a normal person would know it.
Loss of freedom of movement in Downtown Lancaster Entertainment Venues and Constant and
Never Ending Threats of Physical Harm, Harassment, Over-Charging on Cost of Goods,
intimidation, discrimination, and barring from entering public places and entertainment venues,
violations of intellectual property rights, and obstruction of justice.
Loss of freedom of movement; complainant has been denied every opportunity to secure his
personal and business assets at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania making it impossible
to travel or leave for any amount of time without fear of harm.
Loss of freedom of movement may constitute false imprisonment and may invoke the federal
Habeus CORPUS laws of freedom.
Loss of female companionship, and under constant mocking for it.
Loss of business opportunities.

Loss of accounts receivables.

Loss of professional and personal reputation; especially with specific regards to honesty and
integrity.
Civil and Criminal Conspiracy to manufacture mental illness symptoms and illnesses.
The PLAINTIFF acknowledges that this PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF
may lead to a landmark decision, however, the intelligence community, the law enforcement community,
and the military industrial complex has MADE CERTAIN THESE ACTIVITES AND POLICIES REMAINED
HIDDEN FROM THE CITZENRY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND GLOBALLY AS WELL. In fact, all
things considered, the incoming TRUMP ADMINISTRATION may welcome the purging of these
technologies, and tactics of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control; which are used by other criminal elements,
including foreign nations and possibly terrorist organizations.
The Complainant seeks relief by awarding the Complainant his PRO SE BILLINGS
INVOICE. The Complainant seeks relief by awarding the Complainant SUMMARY JUDGMENT in
all cases filed before the LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and the U.S.
DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA in REMEDY AND RELIEF for
the ARROGANCE OF BOTH THE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNITY AND THE JUDICIAL
SYSTEM FOR THE SYSTEMIC ABUSE OF PROCESS AND THE EXTREME NATURE OF THE
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE WHICH IN ITSELF IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PUTTING THE
COMPLAINANT'S LIFE IN HARMS WAY ON A DAILY BASIS.
ATTACHED IS THE LATEST ORDER FOR CASE NO. 16-2513 BY FEDERAL MAGISTRATE KANE ON
JANUARY 31, 2017. ALSO ATTACHED IS THE LATEST LETTER FROM THE PENNSYLVANIA
JUDICIAL BOARD REGARDING 2 EXISTING JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS. Pennsylvania Judicial
Conduct Board LETTER re 2016-788 (Asworth) 2016-789 (Reinaker) February 2, 2017.
Respectfully submitted,
By: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, THE DEBTOR

The Plan Proponent
By: NONE
Attorney for the Plan Proponent

B25B (Official Form 25B) (12/08)
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK

INTENTIONALLY

B25A (Official Form 25A) (12/11)
United States Bankruptcy Court

EASTERN District of PENNSYLVANIA
In re , STANLEY J. CATERBONE Case No. 17-10615REF

Debtor Small Business Case under Chapter 11
STAN J. CATERBONES DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, DATED FEBRUARY 7, 2017

Table of Contents
[Insert when text is finalized]

I. INTRODUCTION
This is the disclosure statement (the Disclosure Statement) in the small business chapter 11
case of STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE DEBTOR. This Disclosure Statement contains information about
the Debtor and describes the [insert name of plan] (the Plan) filed by [the Debtor] on [insert date]. A
full copy of the Plan is attached to this Disclosure Statement as Exhibit A. Your rights may be affected.
You should read the Plan and this Disclosure Statement carefully and discuss them with
your attorney. If you do not have an attorney, you may wish to consult one.
The proposed distributions under the Plan are discussed at pages __-__ of this Disclosure
Statement. [General unsecured creditors are classified in Class __, and will receive a distribution of ___ %
of their allowed claims, to be distributed as follows _________.]
A. Purpose of This Document
This Disclosure Statement describes:
The Debtor and significant events during the bankruptcy case,

How the Plan proposes to treat claims or equity interests of the type you hold (i.e., what you will
receive on your claim or equity interest if the plan is confirmed),
Who can vote on or object to the Plan,
What factors the Bankruptcy Court (the Court) will consider when deciding whether to confirm
the Plan,
Why [the Proponent] believes the Plan is feasible, and how the treatment of your claim or equity
interest under the Plan compares to what you would receive on your claim or equity interest in
liquidation, and
The effect of confirmation of the Plan.
Be sure to read the Plan as well as the Disclosure Statement. This Disclosure Statement
describes the Plan, but it is the Plan itself that will, if confirmed, establish your rights.
B. Deadlines for Voting and Objecting; Date of Plan Confirmation Hearing
The Court has not yet confirmed the Plan described in this Disclosure Statement. This section
describes the procedures pursuant to which the Plan will or will not be confirmed.
1. Time and Place of the Hearing to [Finally Approve This Disclosure Statement
and] Confirm the Plan
The hearing at which the Court will determine whether to [finally approve this Disclosure
Statement and] confirm the Plan will take place on [insert date] , at [insert time], in Courtroom ___,
at the [Insert Courthouse Name, and Full Court Address, City, State, Zip Code].
2. Deadline For Voting to Accept or Reject the Plan
If you are entitled to vote to accept or reject the plan, vote on the enclosed ballot and return the
ballot in the enclosed envelope to [insert address]. See section IV.A. below for a discussion of voting
eligibility requirements.
Your ballot must be received by [insert date] or it will not be counted.
3. Deadline For Objecting to the [Adequacy of Disclosure and] Confirmation of

the Plan Objections to [this Disclosure Statement or to] the confirmation of the Plan must be filed with
the Court and served upon [insert entities] by [insert date].
4. Identity of Person to Contact for More Information

If you want additional information about the Plan, you should contact [insert name and address
of representative of plan proponent].
STAN J. CATERBONE
(717) 598-2200 TEXT OR CALL
C. Disclaimer
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly
discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within
International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a
$1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law
enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our
communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We
continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to
continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed
from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my
Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?
II. BACKGROUND
A. Description and History of the Debtor=s Business

The Debtor, STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, is AN INDIVIDUAL, A CORPORATION, A FICTICIOUS
NAME, ALL CONDUCTING BUSINESS IN THE COMMOWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA SINCE 1986
UNDER VARIOUS NAMES AND REGISTRATIONS. SEE THE FOLLOWING RESUME AND
BIOGRAPHY FOR SPECFIC DETALS.

April 20, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group Biography
Present - Advanced Media Group, President, Owner, and Founder.
In 1987 I became a federal whistleblower for the case of local defense contractor International Signal
and Control, or ISC. ISC was a black ops program for the NSA and CIA that was convicted in 1992 for an
elaborate scheme to arm Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries with a broad array of weapons, most
notably cluster bombs. It was the third larges fraud in U.S. History at that time. I have been a victim of
organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005. I had also
been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S. Sponsored Mind Control turned into an all-out assault of
mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; hacking of all electronic devices; vandilism and thefts of personal
property, extortions, intellectual property violations, obstruction of justice; violations of due process;
thefts and modifications of court documents; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy
devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim. This
assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S.
District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This assault began after
the handlers remotely trained/sychronized Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference
opposed to most other victims of this technology is that I am connected 24/7 with the same person who
declares telepathically she is a known celebrity. Over the course of 10 years I have been telepathic with
at least 20 known persons and have spent 10 years trying to validate and confirm their identities without
success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and
the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment and act on the numerous formal complaints that are filed in
their respective offices. Most complaints are focused on the routine victimization's of a targeted individual
including but not limited to stalking, harassment, threats, vandalism, thefts, extortion, burglaries, false
imprisonments, fabricated mental health warrants or involuntary commitments, pain and torture to the
body, and most often the cause of obstruction of justice is the computer hacking.
I have a very sophisticated and authentic library of evidence of the use of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
technologies on my father and brother that dates back to the 1940's while my father was in the U.S. Navy
after he graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Florida, including an affidavit motorized and
authenticated by my father in 1996. My brother served in the U.S. Air force and was victim to LSD
experiments of the infamous MKULTRA program in the late 1960's.
In 2016 I was the AMICUS for Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane in the Pennsylvania Superior
Court Case No. 1164 EDA 2016 in the COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Kane which included perjury
charges during the alleged leaking of grand jury information. Kathleen Kane took on the Good Old Boy
network regarding judicial reform in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in an effort to rid the state of the
long standing public corruption ring that was evident from local law enforcement to Supreme Court
Justices, and everyone in between.
In 2015 I filed an amicus curie on behalf of Lisa Michelle Lambert who was convicted in 1992 of the
murder of Laurie Show, both of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I currently am in litigation in the U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals and in February of 2016 Lisa Michelle Lambert published her book titled
Corruption in Lancaster County My Story, which is available in bookstores and on Amazon.com. I am
in frequent contact with her co-author, Dave Brown of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
In 2009 I Proposed an ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to
Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor
Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest,
who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide
protections to individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well
as protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons. I again

reintroduced the bill to the Pennsylvania General Assembly in 2015 and frequented the Pennsylvania
Capitol trying to find support and a sponsor; which I still do to this day.
In 2006 I began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is listed as "FULT" on the
NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group, Ltd., a full service financial firm,
Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the strategic vision for his company and the
experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public offering efforts in dealing with Fulton Financial. I
have been in recent discussions with the Fulton Financial Board of Directors with regards to various
complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource Bank acquisition and the subprime failures. I believe
that Fulton Financial needs management to become more aggressive in it's strategic planning and the
performance it expects from it's management team in order to increase shareholder value. Expanding the
footprint of the regional bank has not yielded an increase to the bottom line that is consistent with the
expectations of shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local banking institutions acquired by
larger regional banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton Financial will see in it's local marketplace as
well as in it's regional footprint.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in current litigation in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third District Court
of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the Commonwealth Court
of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. These litigations include
violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust violations, and interference of contracts relating to
several business interests. Central to this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital Technologies, Financial
Management Group, Ltd,/FMG Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along with a Federal False
Claims Act or Federal Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC)
the $1Billion Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation
dates back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was solicited by ISC executives for
professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of RICO Civil Complaint in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, as
docket no. 05-2288.
In 2005 Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn for their attempts to withhold the Tourism
Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center & Marriot. We also proposed
an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel Brunswick and Lancaster Square to all of
the major stakeholders. The Lancaster County Convention Center is finally under construction with a
March 2009 Opening date.
In 2005 I was selected to attend the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City after submission of
an essay with and application. I received the invitation from Bruce R. Lindsey, Chief Executive Officer of
the William J. Clinton Foundation.
In 2005 I began our philanthropic endeavors by spending our energies and working with such
organizations as; ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org, The Clinton Global Initiative, Lancaster
Convention Center Authority, Lancaster Chamber of Commerce, Toms Project Hope, People to People
International, GlobalWarming.org, Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide Hotline, Schreiber Pediatric Center,
and numerous others.
In 2004 I embarked on our past endeavors in the music and entertainment industries with an emphasis
on assisting for the fair and equitable distribution of artists rights and royalties in the fight against
electronic piracy. We have attempted to assist in developing new business models to address the
convergence of physical and electronic mediums; as it displaces royalties and revenues for those creating,
promoting, and delivering a range of entertainment content via wireless networks.
In 2000 to 2002 I developed an array of marketing and communication tools for wholesalers of the AIM
Investment Group and managed several communication programs for several of the company wholesalers
throughout the United States and Costa Rica. We also began a Day Trading project that lasted until 2004
with success.

In 1999 I developed a comprehensive business plan to develop the former Sprecher Brewery, known as
the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This plan was developed in
conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the Revitalization of Downtown
Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the former Watt & Shand building.
In 1999 I contributed to the debate, research, and implementation of strategies to counter the effects of
the global Y2K threat to the worlds computer technologies. I attended the U.S. Sponsored Y2K symposium
and Conference in Washington, D.C. hosted by the Senate Y2K Subcommittee and Senator William
Bennett.
In 1998 I had began to administer the charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a non-profit organization
promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention. We had provided funding
for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide Prevention
Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable organizations and faith based charities. The
video "Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to schools, non profit organizations, faith based
initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational support for the prevention of suicide and to bring
awareness to mental illness problems.
In 1996 I had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the time that I was controller of
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., I was retained by Gallo Rosso Restaurant and Bar to computerized their
accounting and records management from top to bottom. I had also provided consulting for the
computerization of accounting and payroll for Lancaster Container, Inc., of Washington Boro. I was
retained to evaluate and develop an action plan to migrate the Informations Technologies of the Jay
Group, formally of Ronks, PA, now relocated to a new $26 Million Dollar headquarters located in West
Hempfield Township of Lancaster County. The Jay Group had been using IBM mainframe technologies
hosted by the AS 400 computer and server. I was consulting on the merits of migrating to a PC based real
time networking system throughout the entire organization. Currently the Jay Group employees some 500
employees with revenues in excess of $50 Million Dollars per year.
In 1993 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was responsible for saving the
company from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid contracts, the company was
facing extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding insurance company. We were responsible for
implementing computerized accounting, accounting and contract policies and procedures, human resource
policies and procedures, marketing strategies, performance measurement reporting, and negotiate for the
payment of unpaid contracts. The bonding company was especially problematic, since it was the lifeline to
continue work and bidding for public contracts. The Bank of Lancaster County demanded a complete
accounting of the operations in order to stave off a default on the notes and loans it was holding. We
essentially revamped the entire operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in profits of 3
to 4 times its previous years, and record revenues.
In 1991 I was elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador Program, which was
founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was founded to To give specialists
from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and effectively communicate with peers,
The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face scientific, technical, and professional exchanges
throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F. Kennedy, the State Department established a non-
profit private foundation to administer the program. We were scheduled to tour the Soviet Union and
Eastern Europe to discuss printing and publishing technologies with scientists and technicians around the
world.
In 1990 I had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the governments technology think
tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). I co-authored the article Escaping the Unix
Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was published in the magazine DISC, then one of the leading
publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most all call centers deploy that technology whenever you
call an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types of applications involving
telecommunications.
In 1989 I had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic companies

that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with commercial companies,
government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign companies. I performed services and contracts
for the Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of Standards & Technology (NIST), Department
of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency,
Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft, AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond
Buyers, and a host of others. I also was working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing
various interactive mapping technologies, which is now a major asset of Map Quest. Map Quest is the
premier provider of mapping software and applications for the internet and is often used in delivering
maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had arranged for High Industries to sell American
Helix, the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly. We had brokered a deal and the executives
from Donnellys Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to discuss the deal and perform due diligence of
the manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield Industrial Park.
In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York and Tony Bongiovi retained me as executive producer
of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a digital format; the
first of its kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and created the concept for the
Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the copyright and marketing formula of
the DOLBY technology trademark.
We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and
commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording industry
featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of Philadelphia was the lead
patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station Studios was the brainchild of Tony
Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was 15. Tony and Power Station
Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were responsible for developing Bon
Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper,
Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones, Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station
Studios had produced the original Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture. It was released
for distribution and was the number one Sound Track recording of its time.
Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We had
developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the Digital
Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the commercialization
of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry simultaneously with the
release of the Digital Movie.
I also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the
technology, similar to the DOLBY sound systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the Power Station
Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a portable medium, a
compact disc.
In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a major
banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100 million dollars.
Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations from developers across
the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to raise capital that include both debt
and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity funding through private placements, and
debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood,
California to secure financing of their postproduction Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North
Carolina. We had secured refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the
midst of replacing the current loan that was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and
discussions with Drew Anton of the Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We were
quickly seeking commitments for real estate deals from New York to California. We also had a number of
other prominent local developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High Industries,
and the Marty Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets). We were constantly
told that our financing packages were more competitive than local institutions.

In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial services organization
comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had developed a stock purchase
program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in the new firm. FMG had financial
planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys, realtors, liability insurance services, tax
preparers, and estate planners operating out of our corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we
had 24 people on staff, had approximately 12 offices in Pennsylvania, and
several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and our
advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees from the other
professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at about $3 to $4 million.
In 1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for the Professional
Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams scouting departments. (See
Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were dependant on the team scouts to
travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed a strategy of video taping the camp and
the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all of the scouting departments for teams in all
three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was signed at that camp by the Ottawa Roughriders of the
CFL, and went on to be a leading receiver while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues most prominent
quarterbacks. My brother also played 2 years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino was starting
quarterback. We were a Certified Agent for the National Football League Players Association. Gene
Upshaw, the President of the NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp, while we were at a
Conference for agents of the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article about our camp and
associated it with other camps that were questionable about their practices. Actually, that was the very
reason for our camp. We had attended many other camps around the country that were not very well
organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants, with one player coming from as
far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a professional production company
filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and produced the video. The well respected and widely
acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys, had given me support for my
camp during some conversations We had with him and said he looked forward to reviewing the tapes for
any hopeful recruits.
In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International Association
of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4 times. We had
personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial Planner, Ms. Alexandria
Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150 professionals attended the
dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong discussed financial
planning and how all of the professions needed to work together in order to be most effective for their
clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals including; brokers, lawyers, accountants, realtors, tax
specialists, estate planners, bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has become evident that financial
planning was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us from Blue Ball National Bank to
help them develop a Financial Planning department within their bank.
In 1984 I had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President of Citi Group (the
largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to help advise on the future of
Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and the investment industry at large. Mr. Weil
was performing due diligence for the merger of American Express and IDS (Investors Diversified
Services). We were at that time a national leader in the company in delivering Fee Based Financial
Planning Services, which was a new concept in the investment community and mainstream investors. That
concept is now widely held by most investment advisers.

B. Insiders of the Debtor
[Insert a detailed list of the names of Debtor=s insiders as defined in 101(31) of the United
States Bankruptcy Code (the Code) and their relationship to the Debtor. For each insider, list all
compensation paid by the Debtor or its affiliates to that person or entity during the two years prior to
the commencement of the Debtors bankruptcy case, as well as compensation paid during the
pendency of this chapter 11 case.]
THERE ARE NO INSIDERS OF THE DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
C. Management of the Debtor Before and During the Bankruptcy
During the two years prior to the date on which the bankruptcy petition was filed, the officers,
directors, managers or other persons in control of the Debtor (collectively the Managers) were [List
the Managers of the Debtor prior to the petition date].
THERE ARE NO DIRECTORS, MANAGERS, OR THER PERSONS, OTHER THAN THE DEBTOR, STAN
J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
The Managers of the Debtor during the Debtors chapter 11 case have been: [List Managers of the
Debtor during the Debtors chapter 11 case.] After the effective date of the order confirming the Plan, the
directors, officers, and voting trustees of the Debtor, any affiliate of the Debtor participating in a joint Plan
with the Debtor, or successor of the Debtor under the Plan (collectively the Post Confirmation
Managers), will be: [List Post Confirmation Managers of the Debtor.] The responsibilities and
compensation of these Post Confirmation Managers are described in section __ of this Disclosure
Statement.
D. Events Leading to Chapter 11 Filing

[Describe the events that led to the commencement of the Debtors bankruptcy case.]
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal and
Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred. After discussions with ISC and United Chem Con
officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since 1983 of ISC, Stan J.
Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which resulted in a 22 year legal
odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC
founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion
Dollar Fraud and export violations including the selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam
Hussein. However, money, power, influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities
and Federal False Claims Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a
total blockade of all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal,
state, and local laws. This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;
personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most valuable
asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-To-Work under federal
statutes. Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad investment or developed a business
that did not make a profit over the next 22 years. This includes two real estate properties that were
illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.
Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state. ISC was a Department
of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies since it's beginings in
the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National Security Agency or NSA of Ft.
Meade, Maryland.

In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL
& CONTROL OR ISC:
Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with
over 5,000 employees.
James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.
The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA).
Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and
currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.
Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of Directors?
Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the
Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con scandal.
Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.
ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.
Patent Office.
In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great Britain,
Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel regarding
the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq story and lead into
the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert Gates was involved with
ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam
Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I, with
the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by Carlos Cardoen.
On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal & Control
(ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph Roda did
absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would not believe him.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal counsel, and never
mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James
Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank, Lancaster,
County.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),
Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented James Guerin. In
2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police Department (05-cv-
2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster
County Prison, et. al.,.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),
Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007 Joseph
Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S. Special Prosecutor
Fitzpatrick.

THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP
Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger
negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption; burglaries; civil
rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender liability torts; false arrests;
false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had to be covered up and buried in
bureaucratic red tape. Information and findings are still being uncovered and discovered to this day.
Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not
known whether it has closed or not. All of these activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and
organization of the perpetrators. The pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987,
with subgroups changing over time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of
action was followed in order to perpetrate the cover-up:
Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.
Fabricate a history of mental illness.
Fabricate a criminal record.
Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family
into a life of solitaire.
Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,
Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort any
monies and/or possessions of value.
Change the history of events and the truth.
THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM
For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues from court
dockets and judges. During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least twenty attorneys, some
from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of specialties. Attorneys from New York
City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI
agents who specialized in white collar crime that are now globally recognized. However, the money and
influence of persons and entities that wanted these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so
complex and convoluted, and involved such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to
state that there was no case, or their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the
Republican Party and the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that
could not be influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely
unprecedented in nature and in malice.
However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv-2288. This case is
still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J. Caterbone in October of 2008 after
a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008.
The case will be continued upon the security of evidence and the cease and desist of
obstruction of justice and due process. On May 16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia,
Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal. One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for
Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading, Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a

petition for protection under the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet another
round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking with Directed
Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total Mind Control.
REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND WEAPONS.

Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud within
ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to suicide. As far
back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or "remotely viewed". This
was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and never written, spoken, or typed,
was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville,
(Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie Show murder case), someone introduced the
term remote viewing through an email. That was the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was
researched, but that was the extent of the topic. Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a
more direct and continuous way without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental telepathy;
synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices and weapons that
usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim. This assault was no
coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, or
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This assault began after the handlers
remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference opposed to most other
victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she
is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying
to validate and confirm this person without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate,
and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment. See attached
documents for more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into mental
telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program labeled MK
ULTRA and it's subprograms.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local, state, and
federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture, trespass, thefts, and
the like began in earnest. From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment of April
2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group
had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount
Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz. The psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in
an extreme state of confusion. By the end of the summer of 2010 every social media site, including the
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and coercion
by Detective Clark Bearinger.
In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the employees of the
Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building. Then soon after the
Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking Campaign. In addition an
extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in an effort to again SILENCE Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group. And Again, the Lancaster City Police Department took the lead
role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state and federal authorities for help and assistance,
including direct communications with the White House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the
Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S. Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District
Attorney's Office. Since August 1, 2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6)
times due to computer hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and
restored.

On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus Corpus
Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul Diamond was presiding
since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to be granted and the case was
stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling evidence, or lack there of. The
Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial
Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle Lambert. In fact a working theory was filed that
suggested that the East Lampeter Police Department engaged in a strategy of Entrapment
that lead to the unfortunate murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death
claim to be filed by the Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals,
Case No. 15-3400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to
free Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.
Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated Petition for
Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in the Fairmount
Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia. However, this time there was no MANDATORY Treatment Program
Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the
courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a desperate attempt to stop the local torture
campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On
August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered
by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling
hours of torture and a scam of $600.00.
On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger, Officer
Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman. The Complaint contained allegations of torture
and abuse at every moment of contact. The Lancaster City Police Department were so desperate for
retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert case, that they actually broke the door in of
1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the
Lancaster County District Attorney on August 8 th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey Wright, who
dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing Privileges
in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the U.S. Postal
Service and the computer hackers.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County community-
at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis. The community targeting
theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr. John Hall. The community
hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P.
Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.
In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45 audio

cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to 1996. The
tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.
In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J. Caterbone, was most likely a
target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001
was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.
In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National Institute of

Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to find a genetic
marker for depression in the CATERBONE family. Phil interviewed all living descendants and relatives of
my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am alleging that this was a deliberate act
to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and provide plausible deniability for any linkage to
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.
WAS THE PLAINTIFF PLACED ON TERRORIST LIST BY HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY TOM
RIDGE IN 2004?
On March 8, 2016 I was illegally detained, handcuffed and interrogated by no less than eight (8)
National Security Agency Police in the barracks of Ft. Meade Maryland with no probable cause for
approximately 2 hours. My auto was searched and sniffed by the NSA CANINE UNIT. I was interrogated
about events from 1987 to the present involving my Whistleblowing activities, my litigation, my mental
health record and my intent on why I was traveling to Washington, D.C. I was commanded not to
continue on to Washington, D.C. And was commanded not to enter any federally owned property again. I
left the barracks and proceeded home to Lancaster, PA.
In July of 2005 at a military museum (Open to the Public) on a military base I was detained and
interrogated by two (2) Defense Intelligence Agents, or DIA of the Department of Defense in Austin, Texas
for about 1 hours for no probable cause. I was asked the same questions as above and was not allowed
to leave until the agents verified that I was staying with my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, who at the time
resided in Austin, Texas. I was commanded not to ever enter a military base again.
In January of 2006 I was detained and interrogated by Homeland Security in Houston Airport upon
the return from Puerto Vallarte, Mexico after being pulled from the line for allegedly having plastic
explosives in my back pack. Of course it was fabricated and I was allowed to leave.
The Courts must consider UNJUST ENRICHMENT in this case. (Wikipedia, The Free Dictionary by
FARLEX) - A general equitable principle that no person should be allowed to profit at another's expense
without making restitution for the reasonable value of any property, services, or other benefits that have
been unfairly received and retained. Although the unjust enrichment doctrine is sometimes referred to as
a quasi-contractual remedy, unjust enrichment is not based on an express contract. Instead, litigants
normally resort to the remedy of unjust enrichment when they have no written or verbal contract to
support their claim for relief. In such instances litigants ask a court to find a contractual relationship that
is implied in law, a fictitious relationship created by courts to do justice in a particular case.
Targeted Individuals - An Overview (Taken from the following website)

http://targetedindividual.blogspot.com/
Essentially, a targeted individual has officially been declared an "enemy of the State". Your
unrelenting harassment has now entered an entirely new phase. From what was once State and most
likely federal law enforcement surveillance (for whatever reason) has now graduated to a little-known
CIA / U.S. military psychological harassment & physical torture campaign that is so extensive and
seemingly so absurd to the average American citizen, you will almost certainly be labeled as having a
mental illness and/or paranoia just for simply describing what has now become your daily reality. The only
other people that truly understand the extent of the harassment & torture are fellow targeted individuals
who have also been experiencing similar violations of their civil, constitutional and basic human rights.
"I'm being followed everywhere I go", "it seems like they are everywhere", "it's like they can read
my mind and know where I'll be"...these are the types of statements, that while actually quite accurate
(keep reading), can easily make a targeted individual appear to have lost their mind. In order for it to
make more sense, let's once again review who is now orchestrating this abuse against a targeted
individual. Our military (essentially our international police force) and our intelligence community are in
control. This harassment campaign has reached the highest levels of our government and as such, the
resources at their disposable are truly unimaginable. Is it just the military perpetrating this harassment
campaign? Of course NOT! They have simply been handed control. What this means for a targeted
individual is that EVERY law enforcement tool available from your local community watch, community

organizations (ie Freemasons) and "concerned citizen" types all the way up through Homeland Security
including the U.S. military have placed YOU in their cross hairs. If you are a targeted individual your
conversations are being monitored (whether inside your home, your car, your office, and obviously your
telephone), your movements and actions are constantly being monitored (whether inside your home or
out in public), your electronic correspondence is being monitored (email, websites you visit, letters you
write on your computer, etc) - you are being WATCHED! 24/7/365. Again, this isn't your local Sheriff
sitting in an "unmarked" patrol car eating his donut on a stakeout. A targeted individual has every known
(AND classified) technology being deployed, and most likely TESTED, against them. Understand it and
deal with it in a logical and sensible manner. I don't mean to alarm you, but this is the unfortunate reality
that any targeted individual now finds them self in. Maybe it's a little clearer now HOW "they" can be
everywhere you go and seem to be able to "read your mind". Targeted individuals are not crazy - but be
very careful...the perception of mental illness is one of the many traps a program like this was designed to
create. If not the actual illness itself.
So, besides an absolute abomination of a targeted individuals right to privacy, what other tactics
are being deployed against a targeted individual. The hardest to prove and the most criminal tactic used
(especially when a target has 3 young & developing children in the home such as myself) is a continuous
poisoning and torture of the target by invisible directed electromagnetic radiation. If this is a new topic to
you, it may be unclear exactly what electromagnetic radiation (EMR) is. After all, it's not exactly the kind
of topic an average American is thinking about. Well, to name a few examples, electromagnetic radiation
ranges from radio frequency waves (RF) to the more destructive & potentially deadly ionizing forms of x-
rays and gamma rays. In the lower to mid spectrum there are also radar waves, microwaves, ultraviolet
and infrared light waves.
What I noticed when this harassment campaign began for myself toward the end of 2005 was the
continuous jet plane(s) that suddenly began flying "holding patterns" for extended periods of time above
& around my home. My theory is that these planes are equipped with sophisticated radar imaging
technology. Possibly very high powered infrared imaging cameras as well. Rather than using these
electromagnetic radiation devices to "search" for something, in the case of a targeted individual these
devices are used to slowly poison and "overload" the targeted individual with continuous high doses of
directed electromagnetic radiation. Once a targeted individuals body has been properly overexposed over
a period of time (months), other portable devices may then be used to keep a target in a constant state of
agitation and dis-ease. And for the more fragile among us, maybe even death! This tactic can be the
premier form of making a target seem crazy by forcing them to report what appear to be insane
accusations against neighbors, the people "following them everywhere", planes over their home and the
government. Another obvious reason for deploying this invisible & silent torture tactic is to provoke a
targeted individual to lash out in sheer frustration and anger against the closest person (who most likely
has absolutely nothing to do with the ongoing abuse). Essentially, this is the ultimate version of
entrapment. And may even be the ultimate, basically unprovable form of a state-sanctioned murder!
COINTELPRO
COINTELPRO (a portmanteau derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a series of covert,
and at times illegal,[1][2] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political organizations.[3]
FBI records show that COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the FBI deemed
subversive,[4] including anti-Vietnam War organizers, activists of the Civil Rights Movement or Black
Power movement (e.g., Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Black Panther Party), feminist organizations, anti-
colonial movements (such as Puerto Rican independence groups like the Young Lords), and a variety of
organizations that were part of the broader New Left.
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover issued directives governing COINTELPRO, ordering FBI agents to
"expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, neutralize or otherwise eliminate" the activities of these movements
and especially their leaders.[5][6] Under Hoover, the agent in charge of COINTELPRO was William C.
Sullivan.[7] Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy personally authorized some of these programs.[8]
Although Kennedy only gave written approval for limited wiretapping of King's phones "on a trial basis, for

a month or so",[9] Hoover extended the clearance so his men were "unshackled" to look for evidence in
any areas of King's life they deemed worthy.[10]
The History of COINTELPRO

Centralized operations under COINTELPRO officially began in August 1956 with a program designed
to "increase factionalism, cause disruption and win defections" inside the Communist Party U.S.A.
(CPUSA). Tactics included anonymous phone calls, IRS audits, and the creation of documents that would
divide the American communist organization internally.[11] An October 1956 memo from Hoover
reclassified the FBI's ongoing surveillance of black leaders, including it within COINTELPRO, with the
justification that the movement was infiltrated by communists.[12] In 1956, Hoover sent an open letter
denouncing Dr. T.R.M. Howard, a civil rights leader, surgeon, and wealthy entrepreneur in Mississippi who
had criticized FBI inaction in solving recent murders of George W. Lee, Emmett Till, and other blacks in
the South.[13] When the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) was founded in 1957, the FBI
began to monitor and target the group almost immediately, focusing particularly on Bayard Rustin,
Stanley Levison, and, eventually, Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.[14]
After the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, Hoover singled out King as a major
target for COINTELPRO. Under pressure from Hoover to focus on King, Sullivan wrote:
In the light of King's powerful demagogic speech. ... We must mark him now, if we have not done
so before, as the most dangerous Negro of the future in this nation from the standpoint of communism,
the Negro, and national security.[16]
Soon after, the FBI was systematically bugging King's home and his hotel rooms, as they now were
aware that King was growing in stature daily as the leader among leaders of the Negro movement.[17]
In the mid-1960s, King began publicly criticizing the Bureau for giving insufficient attention to the
use of terrorism by white supremacists. Hoover responded by publicly calling King the most "notorious
liar" in the United States.[18] In his 1991 memoir, Washington Post journalist Carl Rowan asserted that
the FBI had sent at least one anonymous letter to King encouraging him to commit suicide.[19] Historian
Taylor Branch documents an anonymous November 21, 1964 "suicide package" sent by the FBI that
contained audio recordings of King's sexual indiscretions combined with a letter telling him "There is only
one way out for you. You better take it before your filthy, abnormal, fraudulent self is bared to the nation."
And even by 1969, as has been noted elsewhere, "[FBI] efforts to 'expose' Martin Luther King, Jr. had not
slackened even though King had been dead for a year. [The Bureau] furnished ammunition to
conservatives to attack King's memory, and...tried to block efforts to honor the slain leader." [20]
During the same period the program also targeted Malcolm X. While an FBI spokesman has denied
that the FBI was "directly" involved in Malcolm's murder, it is documented that the Bureau worked to
"widen the rift" between Malcolm and Elijah Muhammad through infiltration and the "sparking of
acrimonious debates within the organization," rumor-mongering, and other tactics designed to foster
internal disputes; which ultimately led to Malcolm's assassination.[21][22] The FBI heavily infiltrated
Malcolm's Organization of Afro-American Unity in the final months of his life. The Pulitzer Prize-winning
biography of Malcolm X by Manning Marable asserts that most of the men who plotted Malcolm's
assassination were never apprehended and that the full extent of the FBI's involvement in his death
cannot be known.[23][24]
Amidst the urban unrest of JulyAugust 1967, the FBI began "COINTELPROBLACK HATE", which
focused on King and the SCLC as well as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), the
Revolutionary Action Movement (RAM), the Deacons for Defense and Justice, Congress of Racial Equality
(CORE), and the Nation of Islam.[25] BLACK HATE established the Ghetto Informant Program and
instructed 23 FBI offices to "disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize the activities of black
nationalist hate type organizations".[26]

A March 1968 memo stated the program's goal was to "prevent the coalition of militant black
nationalist groups" ; to "Prevent the RISE OF A 'MESSIAH' who could unify...the militant black nationalist
movement" ; "to pinpoint potential troublemakers and neutralize them before they exercise their potential
for violence [against authorities]." ; to "Prevent militant black nationalist groups and leaders from gaining
RESPECTABILITY, by discrediting them to...both the responsible community and to liberals who have
vestiges of sympathy..."; and to "prevent the long-range GROWTH of militant black organizations,
especially among youth." Dr. King was said to have potential to be the "messiah" figure, should he
abandon nonviolence and integrationism;[27] Stokely Carmichael was noted to have "the necessary
charisma to be a real threat in this way;" as he was seen as someone who espoused a much more militant
vision of "black power."[28]
This program coincided with a broader federal effort to prepare military responses for urban riots,
and began increased collaboration between the FBI, Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency,
and the Department of Defense. The CIA launched its own domestic espionage project in 1967 called
Operation CHAOS.[29] A particular target was the Poor People's Campaign, a national effort organized by
King and the SCLC to occupy Washington, D.C. The FBI monitored and disrupted the campaign on a
national level, while using targeted smear tactics locally to undermine support for the march.[30]
Overall, COINTELPRO encompassed disruption and sabotage of the Socialist Workers Party (1961),
the Ku Klux Klan (1964), the Nation of Islam, the Black Panther Party (1967), and the entire New Left
social/political movement, which included antiwar, community, and religious groups (1968). A later
investigation by the Senate's Church Committee (see below) stated that "COINTELPRO began in 1956, in
part because of frustration with Supreme Court rulings limiting the Government's power to proceed
overtly against dissident groups ..."[31] Official congressional committees and several court cases[32]
have concluded that COINTELPRO operations against communist and socialist groups exceeded statutory
limits on FBI activity and violated constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech and association.[1]
The COINTELPRO Program Exposed
The building broken into by the Citizen's Commission to Investigate the FBI, at One Veterans
Square, Media, Pennsylvania
The program was successfully kept secret until 1971, when the Citizens' Commission to Investigate
the FBI burgled an FBI field office in Media, Pennsylvania, took several dossiers, and exposed the program
by passing this material to news agencies.[33] Many news organizations initially refused to publish the
information. Within the year, Director J. Edgar Hoover declared that the centralized COINTELPRO was over,
and that all future counterintelligence operations would be handled on a case-by-case basis.[34][35]
Additional documents were revealed in the course of separate lawsuits filed against the FBI by NBC
correspondent Carl Stern, the Socialist Workers Party, and a number of other groups. In 1976 the Select
Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities of the United States
Senate, commonly referred to as the "Church Committee" for its chairman, Senator Frank Church of
Idaho, launched a major investigation of the FBI and COINTELPRO. Journalists and historians speculate
that the government has not released many dossier and documents related to the program. Many
released documents have been partly, or entirely, redacted.
The Final Report of the Select Committee castigated conduct of the intelligence community in its
domestic operations (including COINTELPRO) in no uncertain terms:
The Committee finds that the domestic activities of the intelligence community at times violated
specific statutory prohibitions and infringed the constitutional rights of American citizens. The legal
questions involved in intelligence programs were often not considered. On other occasions, they were
intentionally disregarded in the belief that because the programs served the "national security" the law did
not apply. While intelligence officers on occasion failed to disclose to their superiors programs which were

illegal or of questionable legality, the Committee finds that the most serious breaches of duty were those
of senior officials, who were responsible for controlling intelligence activities and generally failed to assure
compliance with the law.[1] Many of the techniques used would be intolerable in a democratic society
even if all of the targets had been involved in violent activity, but COINTELPRO went far beyond that ...
the Bureau conducted a sophisticated vigilante operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise of
First Amendment rights of speech and association, on the theory that preventing the growth of dangerous
groups and the propagation of dangerous ideas would protect the national security and deter violence.
[31]
Range of targets
At its inception, the program's main target was the Communist Party.[36] According to the Church
Committee:
While the declared purposes of these programs were to protect the "national security" or prevent
violence, Bureau witnesses admit that many of the targets were nonviolent and most had no
connections with a foreign power. Indeed, nonviolent organizations and individuals were targeted
because the Bureau believed they represented a "potential" for violenceand nonviolent citizens
who were against the war in Vietnam were targeted because they gave "aid and comfort" to violent
demonstrators by lending respectability to their cause.
The imprecision of the targeting is demonstrated by the inability of the Bureau to define the
subjects of the programs. The Black Nationalist program, according to its supervisor, included "a
great number of organizations that you might not today characterize as black nationalist but which
were in fact primarily black." Thus, the nonviolent Southern Christian Leadership Conference was
labeled as a Black Nationalist-"Hate Group."
Furthermore, the actual targets were chosen from a far broader group than the titles of the
programs would imply. The CPUSA program targeted not only Communist Party members but also
sponsors of the National Committee to Abolish the House Un-American Activities Committee and
civil rights leaders allegedly under Communist influence or deemed to be not sufficiently "anti-
Communist". The Socialist Workers Party program included non-SWP sponsors of anti-war
demonstrations which were cosponsored by the SWP or the Young Socialist Alliance, its youth
group. The Black Nationalist program targeted a range of organizations from the Panthers to SNCC
to the peaceful Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and included every Black Student Union
and many other black student groups. New Left targets ranged from the SDS to the InterUniversity
Committee for Debate on Foreign Policy, from Antioch College ("vanguard of the New Left") to the
New Mexico Free University and other "alternate" schools, and from underground newspapers to
students' protesting university censorship of a student publication by carrying signs with four-letter
words on them.

Examples of surveillance, spanning all presidents from FDR to Nixon, both legal and illegal, contained in
the Church Committee report:[37]
President Roosevelt asked the FBI to put in its files the names of citizens sending telegrams to the
White House opposing his "national defense" policy and supporting Col. Charles Lindbergh.
President Truman received inside information on a former Roosevelt aide's efforts to influence his
appointments, labor union negotiating plans, and the publishing plans of journalists.
President Eisenhower received reports on purely political and social contacts with foreign officials
by Bernard Baruch, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas.
The Kennedy administration had the FBI wiretap a congressional staff member, three executive
officials, a lobbyist, and a Washington law firm. US Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy received
the fruits of an FBI wire tap on Martin Luther King, Jr. and an electronic listening device targeting a
congressman, both of which yielded information of a political nature.
President Johnson asked the FBI to conduct "name checks" of his critics and members of the staff
of his 1964 opponent, Senator Barry Goldwater. He also requested purely political intelligence on
his critics in the Senate, and received extensive intelligence reports on political activity at the 1964
Democratic Convention from FBI electronic surveillance.
President Nixon authorized a program of wiretaps which produced for the White House purely
political or personal information unrelated to national security, including information about a
Supreme Court Justice.
Groups that were known to be targets of COINTELPRO operations include
communist and socialist organizations

organizations and individuals associated with the Civil Rights Movement, including Rev. Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr. and others associated with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Congress of Racial Equality, and
other civil rights organizations
black nationalist groups
the Young Lords
the American Indian Movement
the white supremacist groups
the Ku Klux Klan
the National States' Rights Party
a broad range of organizations labeled "New Left", including Students for a Democratic Society and
the Weathermen
almost all groups protesting the Vietnam War, as well as individual student demonstrators with no
group affiliation
the National Lawyers Guild
organizations and individuals associated with the women's rights movement
nationalist groups such as those seeking independence for Puerto Rico, United Ireland, and Cuban
exile movements including Orlando Bosch's Cuban Power and the Cuban Nationalist Movement;
2nd additional notable Americans.[38]
The COINTELPRO documents show numerous cases of the FBI's intentions to prevent and disrupt
protests against the Vietnam War. Many techniques were used to accomplish this task. "These included

promoting splits among antiwar forces, encouraging red-baiting of socialists, and pushing violent
confrontations as an alternative to massive, peaceful demonstrations." One 1966 COINTELPRO operation
tried to redirect the Socialist Workers Party from their pledge of support for the antiwar movement.[39]
Methods
Body of Fred Hampton, national spokesman for the Black Panther Party, who was
murdered[40][41] by members of the Chicago Police Department, as part of a
COINTELPRO operation.[42][43]
According to attorney Brian Glick in his book War at Home, the FBI used four main methods during
COINTELPRO:
Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main purpose
was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential
supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine activists as agents.
Psychological warfare: The FBI and police used myriad "dirty tricks" to undermine progressive
movements. They planted false media stories and published bogus leaflets and other publications
in the name of targeted groups. They forged correspondence, sent anonymous letters, and made
anonymous telephone calls. They spread misinformation about meetings and events, set up pseudo
movement groups run by government agents, and manipulated or strong-armed parents,
employers, landlords, school officials and others to cause trouble for activists. They used bad-
jacketing to create suspicion about targeted activists, sometimes with lethal consequences.[44]
Harassment via the legal system: The FBI and police abused the legal system to harass
dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave perjured testimony and
presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful imprisonment. They
discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government regulations and used conspicuous
surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand jury subpoenas in an effort to intimidate activists
and silence their supporters.[42][45]
Illegal force: The FBI conspired with local police departments to threaten dissidents; to conduct
illegal break-ins in order to search dissident homes; and to commit vandalism, assaults, beatings
and assassinations.[42] The object was to frighten or eliminate dissidents and disrupt their
movements.
The FBI specifically developed tactics intended to heighten tension and hostility between various
factions in the black militancy movement, for example between the Black Panthers, the US Organization,
and the Blackstone Rangers. This resulted in numerous deaths, among which were San Diego Black
Panther Party members John Huggins, Bunchy Carter and Sylvester Bell.[42]
Dhoruba Bin Wahad a former Black Panther, reflects on how these tactics made him feel, saying he
had a combat mentality and felt like he was at war with the government. When asked about why he
thinks the Black Panthers were targeted he said, "In the United States, the equivalent of the military was
the local police. During the early sixties, at the height of the Civil Rights Movement, and the human rights
movement, the police in the United States became increasingly militaristic. They began to train out of
military bases in the United States. The Law Enforcement Assistance Act (LEAA) supplied local police with
military technology, everything from assault rifles to army personnel carriers. In his opinion, the
Counterintelligence Program went hand-in-hand with the militarization of the police in the Black
community, with the militarization of police in America."[46]

The FBI also conspired with the police departments of many U.S. cities (San Diego, Los Angeles, San
Francisco, Oakland, Philadelphia, Chicago) to encourage repeated raids on Black Panther homesoften
with little or no evidence of violations of federal, state, or local lawswhich resulted directly in the police
killing many members of the Black Panther Party, most notably Chicago Black Panther Party Chairman
Fred Hampton on December 4, 1969.[42][43][47]
In order to eliminate black militant leaders whom they considered dangerous, the FBI is believed to
have worked with local police departments to target specific individuals,[48] accuse them of crimes they
did not commit, suppress exculpatory evidence and falsely incarcerate them. Elmer "Geronimo" Pratt, a
Black Panther Party leader, was incarcerated for 27 years before a California Superior Court vacated his
murder conviction, ultimately freeing him. Appearing before the court, an FBI agent testified that he
believed Pratt had been framed, because both the FBI and the Los Angeles Police Department knew he
had not been in the area at the time the murder occurred.[49][50]
Some sources claim that the FBI conducted more than 200 "black bag jobs",[51][52] which were
warrantless surreptitious entries, against the targeted groups and their members.[53]
J. Edgar Hoover
In 1969 the FBI special agent in San Francisco wrote Hoover that his investigation of the Black
Panther Party (BPP) had concluded that in his city, at least, the Panthers were primarily engaged in
feeding breakfast to children. Hoover fired back a memo implying the agent's career goals would be
directly affected by his supplying evidence to support Hoover's view that the BPP was "a violence-prone
organization seeking to overthrow the Government by revolutionary means".[54]
Hoover supported using false claims to attack his political enemies. In one memo he wrote:
"Purpose of counterintelligence action is to disrupt the BPP and it is immaterial whether facts exist to
substantiate the charge."[55]
In one particularly controversial 1965 incident, white civil rights worker Viola Liuzzo was murdered
by Ku Klux Klansmen, who gave chase and fired shots into her car after noticing that her passenger was a
young black man; one of the Klansmen was Gary Thomas Rowe, an acknowledged FBI informant.[56][57]
The FBI spread rumors that Liuzzo was a member of the Communist Party and had abandoned her
children to have sexual relationships with African Americans involved in the Civil Rights Movement.[58]
[59] FBI records show that J. Edgar Hoover personally communicated these insinuations to President
Johnson.[60][61] FBI informant Rowe has also been implicated in some of the most violent crimes of the
1960s civil rights era, including attacks on the Freedom Riders and the 1963 Birmingham, Alabama 16th
Street Baptist Church bombing.[56] According to Noam Chomsky, in another instance in San Diego, the
FBI financed, armed, and controlled an extreme right-wing group of former Minutemen, transforming it
into a group called the Secret Army Organization that targeted groups, activists, and leaders involved in
the Anti-War Movement, using both intimidation and violent acts.[62][63][64]
Hoover ordered preemptive action "to pinpoint potential troublemakers and neutralize them before
they exercise their potential for violence."[5]
Illegal surveillance
The final report of the Church Committee concluded:
Too many people have been spied upon by too many Government agencies and too much
information has been illegally collected. The Government has often undertaken the secret
surveillance of citizens on the basis of their political beliefs, even when those beliefs posed no
threat of violence or illegal acts on behalf of a hostile foreign power. The Government, operating
primarily through secret and biased informants, but also using other intrusive techniques such as

wiretaps, microphone "bugs", surreptitious mail opening, and break-ins, has swept in vast amounts
of information about the personal lives, views, and associations of American citizens. Investigations
of groups deemed potentially dangerousand even of groups suspected of associating with
potentially dangerous organizationshave continued for decades, despite the fact that those
groups did not engage in unlawful activity.
Groups and individuals have been assaulted, repressed, harassed and disrupted because of their
political views, social beliefs and their lifestyles. Investigations have been based upon vague
standards whose breadth made excessive collection inevitable. Unsavory, harmful and vicious
tactics have been employedincluding anonymous attempts to break up marriages, disrupt
meetings, ostracize persons from their professions, and provoke target groups into rivalries that
might result in deaths. Intelligence agencies have served the political and personal objectives of
presidents and other high officials. While the agencies often committed excesses in response to
pressure from high officials in the Executive branch and Congress, they also occasionally initiated
improper activities and then concealed them from officials whom they had a duty to inform.
Governmental officialsincluding those whose principal duty is to enforce the lawhave violated or
ignored the law over long periods of time and have advocated and defended their right to break
the law.
The Constitutional system of checks and balances has not adequately controlled intelligence
activities. Until recently the Executive branch has neither delineated the scope of permissible
activities nor established procedures for supervising intelligence agencies. Congress has failed to
exercise sufficient oversight, seldom questioning the use to which its appropriations were being
put. Most domestic intelligence issues have not reached the courts, and in those cases when they
have reached the courts, the judiciary has been reluctant to grapple with them.[65][66]
Post-COINTELPRO operations
While COINTELPRO was officially terminated in April 1971, critics allege that continuing FBI actions
indicate that post-COINTELPRO reforms did not succeed in ending COINTELPRO tactics.[67][68][69]
Documents released under the FOIA show that the FBI tracked the late David Halberstama Pulitzer
Prize-winning journalist and authorfor more than two decades.[70] "Counterterrorism" guidelines
implemented during the Reagan administration have been described as allowing a return to COINTELPRO
tactics.[71][pages needed] Some radical groups accuse factional opponents of being FBI informants or
assume the FBI is infiltrating the movement.[72]
The IG report found these "troubling" FBI practices between 2001 and 2006. In some cases, the
FBI conducted investigations of people affiliated with activist groups for "factually weak" reasons. Also,
the FBI extended investigations of some of the groups "without adequate basis" and improperly kept
information about activist groups in its files. The IG report also found that FBI Director Robert Mueller III
provided inaccurate congressional testimony about one of the investigations, but this inaccuracy may have
been due to his relying on what FBI officials told him.[73]
Several authors have accused the FBI of continuing to deploy COINTELPRO-like tactics against
radical groups after the official COINTELPRO operations were ended. Several authors have suggested the
American Indian Movement (AIM) has been a target of these operations.
Authors such as Ward Churchill, Rex Weyler, and Peter Matthiessen allege that the federal
government intended to acquire uranium deposits on the Lakota tribe's reservation land, and that this
motivated a larger government conspiracy against AIM activists on the Pine Ridge reservation.[74][75]
[76][77][78] Others believe COINTELPRO continues and similar actions are being taken against activist
groups.[78][79][80] Caroline Woidat says that, with respect to Native Americans, COINTELPRO should be
understood within a historical context in which "Native Americans have been viewed and have viewed the

world themselves through the lens of conspiracy theory."[81] Other authors argue that while some
conspiracy theories related to COINTELPRO are unfounded, the issue of ongoing government surveillance
and repression is real.[82][83]
References
2. "I. Introduction and Summary" (PDF). Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans - Church
Committee final report. United States Senate website. II. United States Government. 1976-04-26.
p. 10. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-04-18. Retrieved 2014-07-15.
Wolf, Paul. "COINTELPRO: The Untold American Story". Archive.org. World Conference Against
Racism, Durbin SA.
Jalon, Allan M. (2006-03-08). "A break-in to end all break-ins; In 1971, stolen FBI files exposed
the government's domestic spying program.". Los Angeles Times. Tribune Company. Archived from
the original on 2013-12-03. Retrieved 2014-07-15.
Jeffreys-Jones, Rhodri (208). The FBI. Yale University Press. p. 189. ISBN 9780300142846.
COINTELPRO Revisited - Spying & Disruption - IN BLACK AND WHITE: THE F.B.I. PAPERS
"A Huey P. Newton Story - Actions - COINTELPRO". PBS. Archived from the original on 2010-11-
18. Retrieved 2008-06-23.
Weiner, Tim (2012). Enemies : A History of the FBI (1st ed.). New York: Random House.
ISBN 9781400067480., p. 196. "Sullivan would become Hoover's field marshal in matters of
national security, chief of FBI intelligence, and commandant of COINTELPRO. In that top secret and
tightly compartmentalized world, an FBI inside of the FBI, Sullivan served as the executor of
Hoover's most clandestine and recondite demands."
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 233. "RFK knew much more about this surveillance than he ever
admitted. He personally renewed his authorization for the taps on Levison's office, and he
approved Hoover's request to tap Levison's home telephone, where King called late at night several
times a week."
Herst, Burton (2007) Bobby and J. Edgar, p. 372.

Herst (2007), pp. 372374
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 195
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 198. "On October 2, 1956, Hoover stepped up the FBI's long-standing
surveillance of black civil rights activists. He sent a COINTELPRO memo to the field, warning that
the Communist Party was seeking to infiltrate the movement."
David T. Beito and Linda Royster Beito, Black Maverick: T.R.M. Howard's Fight for Civil Rights and
Economic Power (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2009), 148, 15459.
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 200.
Gage, Beverly (2014-11-11). "What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals". The New York
Times. Retrieved 2015-01-09.
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 236. "The bugs got quick results. When King traveled, as he did
constantly in the ensuing weeks, to Washington, Milwaukee, Los Angeles, and Honolulu, the Bureau
planted hidden microphones in his hotel rooms. The FBI placed a total of eight wiretaps and
sixteen bugs on King."
Taylor Branch, Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years 1963-1965 (Simon & Schuster, 1999), p.
524-529
Adams, Cecil M. (2003-05-02). "Was Martin Luther King, Jr. a plagiarist?". Washington Post.

Retrieved 2006-06-06.
Taylor Branch, Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years 1963-1965 (Simon & Schuster, 1999) p.
527-529
Taylor Branch, Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years 1963-1965 (Simon & Schuster, 1999), p.
243
Gregory Kane, "FBI should acknowledge complicity in the assassination of Malcolm X" The
Baltimore Sun, May 14, 2000
Toure "Malcolm X: Criminal, Minister, Humanist, Martyr" The New York Times, June 17, 2011
James W. Douglass "The Converging Martyrdom of Malcolm and Martin" Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Lecture, Princeton Theological Seminary, March 29, 2006
"Guide to the Microfilm Edition of FBI Surveillance Files: Black Extremist Organizations, Part 1"
Lexis-Nexis
"The FBI Sets Goals for COINTELPRO" American Social History Project, City University of New York
Rob Warden "Hoover Rated Carmichael As 'Black Messiah'" Chicago Daily News, Feb 10, 1976
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 272. "Some 1,500 army intelligence officers in civilian clothing
undertook the surveillance of some 100,000 American citizens. Army intelligence shared all their
reports over the next three years. The CIA tracked antiwar leaders and black militants who
traveled overseas, and it reported back to the FBI. The FBI, in turn, shared thousands of selected
files on Americans with army intelligence and the CIA. All three intelligence services sent the
names of Americans to the National Security Agency for inclusion on a global watch list; the NSA
relayed back to the FBI hundreds of transcripts of intercepted telephone calls to and from suspect
Americans."
McKnight, Last Crusade, pp. 2628. "By March the Hoover Bureau's campaign against King was
virtually on a total war footing. In a March 21 'urgent' teletype, Hoover urged all field offices
involved in the POCAM project to exploit every tactic in the bureau's arsenal of covert political
warfare to bring down King and the SCLC."
"Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans".
United States Senate. Retrieved 2010-12-01.
See, for example, Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1 (1984); Rugiero v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 257 F.3d
534, 546 (2001).[dead link]
http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/1971/
"A Short History of FBI COINTELPRO", Albion Monitor, Retrieved July 13, 2007. Archived
September 28, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 293

The COINTELPRO Papers - Documents from the FBI's Secret Wars Against Dissent in the United
States by Ward Churchill & Jim Vander Wall. South End Press.
Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans, Final Report of the Senate Committee to Study
Governmental Operations with respect to Intelligence Activities
Various Church Committee reports reproduced online at ICDC: Final Report, 2A; Final Report,2Cb;
Final Report, 3A; Final Report, 3G. Various COINTELPRO documents reproduced online at ICDC:
CPUSA; SWP; Black Nationalist; White Hate; New Left; Puerto Rico. Archived January 13, 2013, at
the Wayback Machine.
Blackstock, Nelson. COINTELPRO: The FBI's Secret War on Political Freedom, Pathfinder, New York.
1975. p. 111.

Michael Newton. Famous Assassinations in World History: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO, p. 205.

ISBN 1610692853
THE CHICAGO CRIME SCENES PROJECT: FRED HAMPTON
The FBI'S Covert Action Program to Destroy the Black Panther Party
FBI Secrets: An Agent's Expose. M. Wesley Swearingen. Boston. South End Press. 1995. Special
Agent Gregg York: "We expected about twenty Panthers to be in the apartment when the police
raided the place. Only two of those black nigger fuckers were killed, Fred Hampton and Mark
Clark."
Ward Churchill (2002), Agents of Repression (Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars Against
the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement ed.), South End Press, ISBN 978-
0896086463, OCLC 50985124, 0896086461
"Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to
Intelligence Activities-Book III" [The Church Report], US Senate, 1976
Bin Wahad, Dhoruba. Still Black, Still Strong. Semiotext, 1993, pp. 18-19
Brown, Elaine. A Taste of Power: A Black Woman's Story. New York: Doubleday, 1992, pp. 204-06
Paul Wolf, "COINTELPRO", ICDC
"Former Black Panther freed after 27 years in jail". CNN. Archived from the original on 2010-11-
18. Retrieved April 30, 2010.
In re Pratt, 82 Cal
Alexander Cockburn; Jeffrey St. Clair (1998). Whiteout: The CIA, Drugs and the Press. Verso.
p. 69. ISBN 978-1-85984-139-6.
FBI document, 19 July 1966, DeLoach to Sullivan re: "Black Bag" Jobs.
[1]
FBI document, 27 May 1969, "Director FBI to SAC San Francisco", available at the FBI reading
room.
FBI document, 16 September 1970, Director FBI to SAC's in Baltimore, Detroit, Los Angeles, New
Haven, San Francisco, and Washington Field Office. Available at the FBI reading room.
Gary May, The Informant: The FBI, the Ku Klux Klan, and the Murder of Viola Luzzo, Yale University
Press, 2005.
"Jonathan Yardley". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2010-11-18. Retrieved
April 30, 2010.
Joanne Giannino. "Viola Liuzzo". Dictionary of Unitarian & Universalist Biography. Archived from
the original on 2010-11-18. Retrieved 2008-09-29.
Kay Houston. "The Detroit housewife who moved a nation toward racial justice". The Detroit News,
Rearview Mirror. Archived from the original on 1999-04-27.
"Uncommon Courage: The Viola Liuzzo Story". Archived from the original on 2007-08-13.
Mary Stanton (2000). From Selma to Sorrow: The Life and Death of Viola Liuzzo. University of
Georgia Press. p. 190.
Noam Chomsky, "Triumphs of Democracy", Excerpted from Language and Responsibility
Watergate and the Secret Army Organization - msg#00404 - culture.discuss.cia-drugs
1972
"Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans Book II, Final Report of the Select Committee

to Study Governmental Operations with respect to Intelligence Activities United States Senate
(Church Committee)". United States Senate. Retrieved May 11, 2006.
"Tapped Out Why Congress won't get through to the NSA.". Slate. Retrieved May 11, 2006.
David Cunningham. There's Something Happening Here: The New Left, the Klan, and FBI.
University of California Press, 2005: "However, strong suspicions lingered that the program's
tactics were sustained on a less formal basissuspicions sometimes furthered by agents
themselves, who periodically claimed that counterintelligence activities were continuing, though in
a manner undocumented within Bureau files."; Hobson v. Brennan, 646 F.Supp. 884 (D.D.C.,1986)
Bud Schultz, Ruth Schultz. The Price of Dissent: Testimonies to Political Repression in America.
University of California Press, 2001: "Although the FBI officially discontinued COINTELPRO
immediately after the Pennsylvania disclosures "for security reasons," when pressed by the Senate
committee, the bureau acknowledged two new instances of "Cointelpro-type" operations. The
committee was left to discover a third, apparently illegal operation on its own."
Athan G. Theoharis, et al. The FBI: A Comprehensive Reference Guide. Greenwood Publishing
Group, 1999: "More recent controversies have focused on the adequacy of recent restrictions on
the Bureau's domestic intelligence operations. Disclosures of the 1970s that FBI agents continued
to conduct break-ins, and of the 1980s that the FBI targeted CISPES, again brought forth
accusations of FBI abuses of powerand raised questions of whether reforms of the 1970s had
successfully exorcised the ghost of FBI Director Hoover."
The Associated Press, "FBI tracked journalist for over 20 years". Toronto Star. November 7, 2008.
Retrieved November 23, 2008.
Bud Schultz, Ruth Schultz. The Price of Dissent: Testimonies to Political Repression in America.
University of California Press, 2001: "The problem persists after Hoover."The record before this
court," Federal Magistrate Joan Lefkow stated in 1991, "shows that despite regulations, orders and
consent decrees prohibiting such activities, the FBI had continued to collect information concerning
only the exercise of free speech."
Mike Mosedale, "Bury My Heart," City Pages, Volume 21 - Issue 1002, 16 February 2000
"FBI Probes of Groups Were Improper, Justice Department Says". The San Jose Mercury News.
September 20, 2010. also reported at democracynow.org, 21 September 2010
Churchill, Ward, and Jim Vander Wall, (1990), The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from the FBI's
Secret Wars Against Domestic Dissent, Boston: South End Press, pp. xii, 303.
Churchill, Ward; and James Vander Wall. Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars against the
Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement, 1988, Boston, South End Press.
Weyler, Rex. Blood of the Land: The Government and Corporate War Against First Nations.
Matthiessen, Peter, In the Spirit of Crazy Horse, 1980, Viking.
Woidat, Caroline M. "The Truth Is on the Reservation: American Indians and Conspiracy Culture",
The Journal of American Culture 29 (4), 2006, pp. 454467
McQuinn, Jason. "Conspiracy Theory vs Alternative Journalism", Alternative Press Review, Vol. 2,
No. 3, Winter 1996
Horowitz, David. "Johnnie's Other O.J.", Front Page Magazine.com, September 1, 1997.
Woidat, Caroline M. "The Truth Is on the Reservation: American Indians and Conspiracy Culture",
The Journal of American Culture 29 (4), 2006. pp. 454467
Berlet, Chip. "The X-Files Movie: Facilitating Fanciful Fun, or Fueling Fear and Fascism? Conspiracy
Theories for Fun, Not for False Prophets", 1998, Political Research Associates
Berlet, Chip; and Matthew N. Lyons. 1998, "One key to litigating against government prosecution
of dissidents: Understanding the underlying assumptions", Parts 1 and 2, Police Misconduct and

Civil Rights Law Report (West Group), 5 (13), (JanuaryFebruary): 145153; and 5 (14), (March
April): 157162.

CIA Mind Control Experiments

Declassified Documents Reveal Sex Abuse, and More
Taken from the website:

(http://www.wanttoknow.info/mind_control/cia_mind_control_experiments_sex_abuse)
Tragic, heartbreaking mass murders in recent years have spread fear and panic among the general
public. Yet some are questioning if there isn't more than meets the eye with these cruel and bizarre
events. Is it conceivable that there might be a deeper agenda here?
This essay presents undeniable evidence that secret government mind control programs
have created assassins out of unsuspecting citizens.
The astonishing excerpts below, taken verbatim from declassified CIA documents, reveal detailed
mind control experiments in highly secret, government-sponsored experiments. Through hypnosis, drugs,
and electric shock, CIA clinicians fractured personalities and induced multiple personality disorder (MPD)
also called dissociative identity disorder (DID).
These top secret experiments were successful in creating Manchurian Candidates or

super spies programmed to carry out assassination, terrorist acts, sexual favors, and more
without conscious knowledge of what they were doing. The army of Manchurian Candidates created
may have played a key, hidden role in world politics.
To verify this startling information, links are provided to scanned images of the original CIA
documents. Instructions are also available here to order any of these documents directly from the CIA
using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Though dating from the 1950s and 60s, these revealing documents were not released for decades
for reasons of "national security." The U.S. government claims mind control experiments are no longer
being carried out, yet how can we know? The existence of these programs was denied for decades, and
certainly any recent documents would be classified secret under the rubric of "national security."
A trusted CIA informant I know assures me that these programs are ongoing. These disturbing
methods are used by various countries in clandestine operations around the world. Many might prefer not
to look at these ugly wounds to the soul of our nation and world. Yet if we avoid or ignore them, they are
likely to grow and fester.
CIA document and page number: 190684, pp. 1, 4

Title: Outline of Special H Cases
Date: 7 January 1953
Page 1, Page 4
In a general request for volunteers [deleted names] volunteered for H [hypnosis] experimentation and
were originally tested on 21 May 1951. Both girls, at this time, were nineteen years of age. These
subjects have clearly demonstrated that they can pass from a fully awake state to a deep H controlled
state via the telephone, via some very subtle signal that cannot be detected by other persons in the room,
and without the other individuals being able to note the change.
It has been shown clearly that physically individuals can be induced into H by telephone, by receiving
written matter, or by the use of code, signal, or words. Control of those hypnotized can be passed
from one individual to another without great difficulty. It has also been shown by
experimentation with these girls that they can act as unwilling couriers for information
purposes, and that they can be conditioned to a point where they believe a change in identity on their
part even on the polygraph.
Note: This document shows that CIA experimenters were successful in hypnotizing young women (19

years old in this case) to do things they would not do normally without any memory afterward, sometimes
even unwillingly. Though they volunteered, these women were thus programmed to be Manchurian
Candidates or super spies with no knowledge of what these men were doing to them.
CIA document and page number: 17395, p. 18

Title: ESP Research
Date: Unknown
Link to view image of original: Click here
Learning models will be instituted in which the subject will be rewarded or punished for his overall
performance and reinforced in various ways by being told whether he was right, by being told what the
target was, with electric shock etc. ... In other cases drugs and psychological tricks will be used
to modify his attitudes. The experimenters will be particularly interested in disassociative states, from
the abaissement de niveau mental to multiple personality in so-called mediums, and an attempt will be
made to induce a number of states of this kind, using hypnosis.
Note: This document provides proof that the CIA was was using drugs and electric shock in attempting to
induce MPD (multiple personality disorder). Though this document uses the masculine "he" to describe the
subject, other documents show that most of the subjects used were young women who volunteered. The
subjects were not informed about the deeper aspects and implications for which they were being trained.
If you view the original, you will also find interesting information on ESP experiments.
CIA document and page number: 190691, p. 1, 2

Title: Hypnotic Experimentation and Research
Date: 10 February 1954
Link to view image of original: Page 1, Page 2
A posthypnotic of the night before (pointed finger, you will sleep) was enacted. Misses [deleted] and
[deleted] immediately progressed to a deep hypnotic state with no further suggestion. Miss [deleted]
was then instructed (having previously expressed a fear of firearms in any fashion) that she
would use every method at her disposal to awaken miss [deleted] (now in a deep hypnotic
sleep), and failing this, she would pick up a pistol nearby and fire it at Miss [deleted]. She was
instructed that her rage would be so great that she would not hesitate to "kill" [deleted] for
failing to awaken.
Miss [deleted] carried out these suggestions to the letter including firing the (unloaded pneumatic pistol)
gun at [deleted] and then proceeding to fall into a deep sleep. After proper suggestions were made, both
were awakened and expressed complete amnesia for the entire sequence. Miss [deleted] was again
handed the gun, which she refused (in an awakened state) to pick up or accept form the operator. She
expressed absolute denial that the foregoing sequence had happened.
Miss [deleted] felt reluctant about participating further since she expressed her doubt as to any
useful purpose in further attendance. The Operator thereupon proceeded in full view of all other subjects
to explain to Miss [deleted] that he planned to induce a deep state of hypnosis now. The reaction was as
had been expected. Miss [deleted] excused herself to make a telephone call (defense mechanism?). Upon
her return a very positive approach was adopted by the operator whereupon a deeper, much deeper state
of hypnosis was obtained.
Immediately a posthypnotic was induced that when the operator accidently dropped a steel ball in his
hand to the floor ... Miss [deleted] would again go into hypnosis. Miss [deleted] then advised that she
must conclude her work for the evening. She arose to adjust her hair before the mirror. The ball was
dropped and she promptly slumped back into the chair and back into hypnosis. It is the opinion of the
operator the Miss [deleted] if properly trained (positive approach) will continue to improve.
Note: Here we have proof that these women could be converted into unsuspecting and even unwilling
assassins. They could be programmed to assassinate anyone and would do so without any conscious

knowledge afterward. Note also the questionable status of "volunteer" implied. Though these women
originally volunteered, unwillingness to continue could be manipulated by the men running the program.
CIA document and page number: 190527, pp. 1, 2

Title: SI and H Experimentation
Date: 25 September 1951
Link to view images of original: Page 1, Page 2
Note: SI stands for sleep induction and H for hypnosis
Prior to actually beginning the more complex experiments, several simple post H were worked with
both of the girls participating. The first major experiment of the evening was set up as follows
without previous explanation to either [deleted] or [deleted]. Both subjects were placed in a very
deep trance state and while in this state, the following instructions were given:
(A) [Deleted] was instructed that when she awakened, she was to procede to [deleted] room. She was
told that while there, she would receive a telephone call from an individual whom she would know only as
"Joe". This individual would engage her in a normal telephone conversation. During this conversation,
this individual would give her a code word and upon mentioning the code word, [deleted]
would go into a deep SI [sleep induction] trance state, but would be "normal" in appearance
with her eyes open.
[Deleted] was then told that upon the conclusion of the telephone conversation, she would procede to the
ladies room where she would meet a girl who was unknown to her. She was told that she would strike up
a conversation with this girl and during the conversation she would mention the code word "New York" to
this other girl, who, in turn, would give her a device and further instructions which were to be carried out
by [deleted]. She was told that after she carried out the instructions, she was to return to the Operations
Room, sit in the sofa and go immediately into a deep sleep.
(B) [Deleted] was instructed that upon awakening, she would proceed to [deleted] room where she would
wait at the desk for a telephone call. Upon receiving the call, a person known as "Jim" would engage her
in normal conversation. During the course of the conversation, this individual would mention a code word
to [deleted]. When she heard this code word, she would pass into a SI trance state, but would not close
her eyes and remain perfectly normal and continue the telephone conversation. She was told that upon
conclusion of the telephone conversation, she would then carry out the following instructions:
[Deleted] being in a complete SI state at this time, was then told to open her eyes and was shown an
electric timing device. She was informed that this timing device was an incendiary bomb and was
then instructed how to attach and set the device. After [deleted] had indicated that she had learned
how to set and attach the device, she was told to return to a sleep state and further instructed that upon
concluding the aforementioned conversation, she would take the timing device which was in a briefcase
and proceed to the ladies room.
In the ladies room, she would be met by a girl whom she had never seen who would identify herself by
the code word "New York." [Deleted] was then to show this individual how to attach and set the
timing device and further instructions would be given the individual by [deleted] that the
timing device was to be carried in the briefcase to [deleted] room, placed in the nearest empty
electric-light plug and concealed in the bottom, left-hand drawer of [deleted] desk, with the
device set for 82 seconds and turned on.
[Deleted] was further instructed to tell this other girl that as soon as the device had been set and turned

on, she was to take the briefcase, leave [deleted] room, go to the operations room and go to the sofa and
enter a deep sleep state. [Deleted] was further instructed that after completion of instructing the other
girl and the transferring to the other girl of the incendiary bomb, she was to return at once to the
operations room, sit on the sofa, and go into a deep sleep state.
For a matter of record, immediately after the operation was begun it was noted that a member of the
charforce was cleaning the floor in the ladies room and subsequently, both [deleted] and [deleted] had to
be placed ... once again in a trance state and instructions changed from the ladies room to Room 3. It
should be noted that even with the change of locale in the transfer point, the experiment was carried off
perfectly without any difficulty or hesitation on the part of either of the girls. Each girl acted out their part
perfectly, the device was planted and set as directed and both girls returned to the operations room, sat
on the sofa and entered a deep sleep state. Throughout, their movements were easy and natural.
Note: You will note the frequent use of "girls" (young women) in these programs. Do you think the men
in charge, having complete hypnotic control of these women, might have at times taken advantage of
them sexually? Yet this would never enter the official documentation, with the one major exception below.

Title: [Deleted]
Date: 9 July 1951
On 2 July 1951 approximately 1:00 p.m. the instruction began with [deleted] relating to the student
some of his sexual experiences. [Deleted] stated that he had constantly used hypnotism as a
means of inducing young girls to engage in sexual intercourse with him. [Deleted], a
performer in [deleted] orchestra, was forced to engage in sexual intercourse with [deleted] while
under the influence of hypnotism. [Deleted] stated that he first put her into a hypnotic trance and
then suggested to her that he was her husband and that she desired sexual intercourse with him.
Note: This document shows that an instructor being used by the CIA took advantage of his skill in
hypnosis to sexually abuse young women without their having any knowledge of being abused. How
many CIA hypnotists did likewise? Do you think a man involved in these programs might take
advantage of a beautiful, young woman knowing she would not remember afterward?
Note that for some reason this document is not available in the CIA's three CD set and must be
ordered individually at this link. See the What You Can Do section at the end of this page for
suggestions on how we can stop this abuse.
CIA document and page number: 17441, p.8

Title: Continuation of Studies of Hypnosis and Suggestibility
Date: Unknown
Preliminary clinical research during 1955-56 has yielded promising leads in terms of
knowledge of how hypnotizability can be influenced by pharmacological means.
Experiments involving altered personality function as a result of environmental manipulation (chiefly
sensory isolation) have yielded promising leads in terms of suggestibility and the production of
trance-like states. There is reason to believe that environmental manipulations can affect
tendencies for dissociative phenomenon to occur.

Note: "Dissociative phenomenon" refers to the ability of a person's consciousness to leave and a
new consciousness enter, thereby facilitation the creation of "alter" or multiple personalities.
Besides hypnosis, drugs and electric shocks were developed as means to facilitate the creation of
Manchurian Candidates.
CIA document and page number:17748, pp. 1, 2, 4, 6-9

Title: Report of Inspection of MKULTRA
Date: 26 July 1963
Link to view images of original: Page 1, Page 2, Page 4, Page 6, Page 7, Page 8, Page 9.
It was deemed advisable to prepare the report of the MKULTRA program in one copy only, in view of
its unusual sensitivity. The MKULTRA activity is concerned with the research and development of
chemical, biological, and radiological materials capable of employment in clandestine operation to
control human behavior. MKULTRA was authorized by then Director of Central Intelligence [DCI],
Allen W. Dulles, in 1953.
The concepts involved in manipulating human behavior are found by many people both within and outside
the Agency to be distasteful and unethical. Nevertheless, there have been major accomplishments both in
research and operational employment. Some MKULTRA activities raise questions of legality implicit in the
original charter. A final phase of testing of MKULTRA products places the rights and interests of
U.S. citizens in jeopardy. Public disclosure of some aspects of MKULTRA activity could induce
serious adverse reaction in U.S. public opinion. The DCI's memorandum ... exempted MKULTRA from
audit.
Over the ten-year life of the program many additional avenues to the control of human behavior have
been designated by the TSD management [Technical Services Division - under which MKULTRA operated]
as appropriate to investigation under the MKULTRA charter, including radiation, electro-shock, various
fields of psychology, psychiatry, sociology, and anthropology, graphology, harassment substances, and
paramilitary devices and materials.
TSD initiated a program for covert testing of materials on unwitting U.S. citizens in 1955. TSD has
pursued a philosophy of minimum documentation in keeping with the high sensitivity of some of the
projects. The lack of consistent records precluded use of routine inspection procedures and raised a
variety of questions concerning management and fiscal controls.
There are just two individuals in TSD who have full substantive knowledge of the program and
most of that knowledge is unrecorded. In protecting both the sensitive nature of the American
intelligence capability to manipulate human behavior, they apply "need to know" doctrine to
their professional associates and to their clerical assistants to a maximum degree.
Note: Why did only two people have full substantive knowledge of the program? Could it be that sex
abuse and political manipulations behind the scenes were so severe that no one was to be trusted? Do
you think we could trust those two individuals? CIA Director Richard Helms, upon hearing there would be
a Congressional investigation, ordered the destruction of all documents from these unethical and at times
illegal mind control programs in 1973. He did not realize, however, that incriminating evidence remained
in the financial files of the agency, which are what you read here. We can only imagine what secrets the
destroyed documents held.
CIA document and page number: 87624, p. 3, 4 (also appended to 17748, p. 32, 33)
Title: Two Extremely Sensitive Research Programs
Date: 3 April 1953
Link to view images of original: Page 3, Page 4

Approximately 6% of the projects are of such an ultra-sensitive nature that they cannot and should
not be handled by means of contracts which would associate CIA or the Government with the work
in question.
We intend to investigate the development of a chemical material which causes a reversible non-toxic
aberrant mental state, the specific nature of which can be reasonably well predicted for each individual.
This material could potentially aid in discrediting individuals, eliciting information, implanting
suggestion and other forms of mental control.
In a great many instances the work in field (a) must be conducted by individuals who are not and should
not be aware of our interest. In all cases dealing with field (b), it is mandatory that any connections with
the Agency should be known only to an absolute minimum number of people who have been specifically
cleared for this purpose.
Experience has shown that qualified, competent individuals in the field of pharmacological, physiological,
psychiatric and other biological sciences are most reluctant to enter into signed agreements of any sort
which connect them with this activity since such a connection would jeopardize their professional
reputations. Even internally in CIA, as few individuals as possible should be aware of our
interest in these fields and of the identity of those who are working for us. At present, this
results in ridiculous contracts, with cut-outs, which do not spell out the scope or intent of the
work.
Note: In the three CD set, this document is found appended to document 17748 on pp. 30 to 37.

Title: None Given
Date:1 January 1950
Drug Project - A project in the isolation and synthesis of pure drugs for use in effecting psychological
entry and control of the individual.
Drugs and electricity - Research work on the effects of lysergic acid [LSD] on animals. Use of electric
shock and the encephalograph in interrogation. Particular emphasis on the detection and prior use
of electric shock and the 'guaranteed amnesia' resulting from electric shock.
Hypnosis - Investigation of the possibilities of hypnotic and post-hypnotic control.
CIA document and page number: 140394, pp. 2, 3 (not available in CD set, order individually
here)
Title: Interview with [Deleted]
Date: 25 February 1952
Link to view full text of both pages: Click here
Q: What are your experiences in general with hypnotism?
A: I have been a professional hypnotist for at least 15 years. At present, I am employed on a very
confidential basis two days a week.
Q: Can you obtain information from an individual, willing or unwilling, by hypnotism?
A: Definitely, yes. Many of the medical cases I work on are involved in obtaining personal,
intimate information, and through hypnotism, I have been quite successful in obtaining this. If
an individual refuses to co-operate with hypnosis, the doctors with whom I work use drugs,
always sodium amytal.

Q: How far do you think individuals could be controlled by hypnosis?
A: This is a very difficult subject. Post-hypnotics will last twenty years and will be very strong if re-
enforced from time to time.
Q: Have you ever had any experience with drugs?
A: Yes, many times. I have worked with doctors using sodium amytal and pentothal and have obtained
hypnotic control after the drugs were used. In fact, many times drugs were used for the purpose of
obtaining hypnotic control.
Q: Do you have any ideas that hypnotism could be used as a weapon?
A: Yes, I have thought about this often. It could certainly be used in obtaining information from
recalcitrant people particularly with drugs. It could be used as a recruiting source for special types of
work. A good hypnotist running hypnotic shows for entertainment would pick up a great many
subjects, some of whom might be exceptionally good subjects for us. These subjects could
easily be tabbed and put to use.
Q: Have you ever been able to produce hypnosis without an individual's knowledge?
A: Yes, through the relaxing technique and on rare occasions [I've] been able to produce hypnotism
against a person's will. However, you cannot count on this and to attempt to attach an individual who did
not want to be hypnotized alone would be almost an impossible task. In that type of case, I would use
sodium amytal and/or sodium pentothal.
Q: How effective are post-hypnotics; over what distances and time can they be effective?
A: Properly used post-hypnotics will last twenty years. They can be made more effective by re-
enforcement from time to time. Post-hypnotics are not affected at all by time or travel or distance away
from the person who placed the post-hypnotic. As a rule, post-hypnotics should be 100% effective in good
subjects.
Q: Can individuals be made to do things under hypnosis that they would not otherwise?
A: Individuals could be taught to do anything including murder, suicide, etc. I do believe that
you could carry out acts that would be against an individual's moral feelings if they were
rightly, psychologically conditioned.
Note: Individuals can be hypnotized without their knowledge. They can be programmed to commit
murder, suicide, and much more. Think about the implications. How many "suicides" of important
people we've heard in the news were not really suicides? How many murders were committed by
people who didn't even realize they were assassins? How much has this technology been used to
manipulate world politics? Think about the Kennedys, Martin Luther King, Jr., and possibly those
involved with 9/11 and other major terrorist attacks. Note this document is not available in the
three CD set and must be ordered individually at this link.
CIA document and page number: 140401, pp. 6, 7 (not available in CD set, order individually
here)
Title: Special Research, Bluebird
Date: 1 January 1952 (approximate)
Link to view full text of both pages: Click here

Set out below are specific problems which can only be resolved by experiment, testing and
research.
Can we obtain control of the future activities (physical and mental) of any given individual, willing
or unwilling by application of SI [sleep induction] and H [hypnosis] techniques?
Can we create by post-H control an action contrary to an individual's basic moral principles?
Can we in a matter of an hour, two hours, one day, etc., induce an H condition in an unwilling
subject to such an extent that he will perform an act for our benefit?
Could we seize a subject and in the space of an hour or two by post-H control have him
crash an airplane, wreck a train, etc.?
Can we by H and SI techniques force a subject (unwilling or otherwise) to travel long distances,
commit specified acts and return to us or bring documents or materials?
Can we guarantee total amnesia under any and all conditions?
Can we "alter" a person's personality?
Can we devise a system for making unwilling subjects into willing agents and then transfer that
control to untrained agency agents in the field by use of codes or identifying signs?
Is it possible to find a gas that can be used to gain SI control from a gas pencil, odorless, colorless:
one shot, etc.?
What are full details on "sleep-inducing machine"?
How can sodium A or P or any other sleep inducing agent be best concealed in a normal
or commonplace item, such as candy, cigarettes, liquer, wines, coffee, tea, beer, gum
water, aspirin tablets, common medicines, coke, tooth paste?
Can we, using SI and H extract complicated formula from scientists, engineers, etc., if unwilling?
Note: Reading all of the declassified CIA documents listed in this essay suggests that the answer to
most, if not all of the questions above appears to be yes. Note that sleep inducing agents were
being placed in candy, aspirin, Coke, and more. Think about the implications if even just a few of
the men in these programs decided to use such things outside of the office to manipulate others for
their personal benefit. It's time that this information be made public so we can all be aware of
what's going on and work to stop the abuses. Note for some reason this document is not available
in the three CD set and must be ordered individually at this link.
Science Digest Article, pp. 44 - 53 (Not a CIA document, but related to the mind control
programs)
Title: Hypnosis Comes of Age
Date: April 1971
Link to view full text of article: Click here
Psychologist G. H. Estabrooks reminisces about his long career as a hypnotist. Dr. Estabrooks discusses
how he "programmed" American spies with hypnosis and how he helped businessmen and students with
his skills. Dr. Estabrooks is a Rhodes Scholar. He took his Doctorate at Harvard ('26), and has authored
many articles and books on clinical hypnosis and human behavior.

One of the most fascinating but dangerous applications of hypnosis is its use in military intelligence. This
is a field with which I am familiar through formulating guidelines for the techniques used by the United
States in two world wars. I was involved in preparing many subjects for this work during World War II.
One successful case involved an Army Service Corps Captain whom we'll call George Smith. Captain Smith
had undergone months of training. He was an excellent subject but did not realize it. I had removed
from him, by post-hypnotic suggestion, all recollection of ever having been hypnotized. Outside
of myself, Colonel Brown was the only person who could hypnotize Captain Smith. This is "locking." I
performed it by saying to the hypnotized Captain: "Until further orders from me, only Colonel Brown and I
can hypnotize you. We will use a signal phrase 'the moon is clear.' " The system is virtually foolproof.
By the 1920's, not only had they learned to apply post-hypnotic suggestion, [they] also had
learned how to split certain complex individuals into multiple personalities like Jeckyl-Hydes.
During World War II, I worked this technique with a vulnerable Marine lieutenant I'll call Jones. Under the
watchful eye of Marine Intelligence, I spilt his personality into Jones A and Jones B. Jones A, once a
"normal" working Marine, became entirely different. He talked communist doctrine and meant it. He was
welcomed enthusiastically by communist cells, was deliberately given a dishonorable discharge by the
Corps (which was in on the plot) and became a card-carrying party member.
The joker was Jones B, the second personality, formerly apparent in the conscious Marine. Under
hypnosis, this Jones had been carefully coached by suggestion. Jones B was the deeper personality, knew
all the thoughts of Jones A, was a loyal American, and was "imprinted" to say nothing during conscious
phases. All I had to do was hypnotize the whole man, get in touch with Jones B, the loyal American, and I
had a pipeline straight into the Communist camp.
Note: This article shows that in the 1920s, U.S. military intelligence had already developed the
capability to cause split personalities. The created super spy or Manchurian Candidate has been a
reality for nearly a century, yet very few people know anything about it. These unknowing spies
could plant bombs, provide sexual favors, and even assassinate top political leaders. Consider that
many countries and key powerful, elite groups have had and used this technology for many
decades. Watch the movie Manchurian Candidate to see how real it is.

E. Significant Events During the Bankruptcy Case

[Describe significant events during the Debtors bankruptcy case:
Describe any asset sales outside the ordinary course of business, debtor in possession
financing, or cash collateral orders.
Identify the professionals approved by the court.
Describe any adversary proceedings that have been filed or other significant litigation that
has occurred (including contested claim disallowance proceedings), and any other
significant legal or administrative proceedings that are pending or have been pending
during the case in a forum other than the Court.
Describe any steps taken to improve operations and profitability of the Debtor.
Describe other events as appropriate.]
THERE WAS ONLY LITIGATION EXPENSES AND THE RECEIPT OF SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY
BENEFITS FROM 2008 TO THE PRESENT.
F. Projected Recovery of Avoidable Transfers [Choose the option that applies]
[Option 1 If the Debtor does not intend to pursue avoidance actions]

The DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE does not intend to pursue preference, fraudulent
conveyance, or other avoidance
actions.
[Option 2 If the Debtor intends to pursue avoidance actions]

The Debtor estimates that up to $0. may be realized from the recovery of fraudulent,
preferential or other avoidable trans$0. may be realized from the recovery of fraudulent,
transfers. While the results of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty
and it is possible that other causes of action may be identified, the following is a summary of the
preference, fraudulent conveyance and other avoidance actions filed or expected to be filed in this case:
Transaction Defendant Amount Claimed
[Option 3 If the Debtor does not yet know whether it intends to pursue avoidance actions]
The Debtor has not yet completed its investigation with regard to prepetition transactions. If you
received a payment or other transfer within 90 days of the bankruptcy, or other transfer avoidable under
the Code, the Debtor may seek to avoid such transfer.
G. Claims Objections
Except to the extent that a claim is already allowed pursuant to a final non-appealable order, the
Debtor reserves the right to object to claims. Therefore, even if your claim is allowed for voting
purposes, you may not be entitled to a distribution if an objection to your claim is later upheld. The
procedures for resolving disputed claims are set forth in Article V of the Plan.
H. Current and Historical Financial Conditions

The identity and fair market value of the estate=s assets are listed in Exhibit B. [Identify source
and basis of valuation.]
The Debtor=s most recent financial statements [if any] issued before bankruptcy, each of which
was filed with the Court, are set forth in Exhibit C.
[The most recent post-petition operating report filed since the commencement of the Debtors
bankruptcy case are set forth in Exhibit D.] [A summary of the Debtors periodic operating reports
filed since the commencement of the Debtors bankruptcy case is set forth in Exhibit D.]
III. SUMMARY OF THE PLAN OF REORGANIZATION AND TREATMENT OF

CLAIMS AND EQUITY INTERESTS

A. What is the Purpose of the Plan of Reorganization?
As required by the Code, the Plan places claims and equity interests in various classes and
describes the treatment each class will receive. The Plan also states whether each class of claims or
equity interests is impaired or unimpaired. If the Plan is confirmed, your recovery will be limited to
the amount provided by the Plan.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS REORGANIZATION AND DISCLOSURE PLAN IS TO FORMALIZE THE
INTENT OF THE LITIGATION OF THE DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, AND TO ERMARK A
CERTAIN PORTION OF THE FUTURE SETTELMENTS FOR THE CREDITORS NAMED HEREIN.
B. Unclassified Claims
Certain types of claims are automatically entitled to specific treatment under the Code. They
are not considered impaired, and holders of such claims do not vote on the Plan. They may, however,
object if, in their view, their treatment under the Plan does not comply with that required by the Code.
As such, the Plan Proponent has not placed the following claims in any class:
NO CLAIMS APPLY
1. Administrative Expenses
Administrative expenses are costs or expenses of administering the Debtor=s chapter 11 case
which are allowed under 507(a)(2) of the Code. Administrative expenses also include the value of
any goods sold to the Debtor in the ordinary course of business and received within 20 days before the
date of the bankruptcy petition. The Code requires that all administrative expenses be paid on the
effective date of the Plan, unless a particular claimant agrees to a different treatment.
ALL PLAN COSTS ARE BORNE BY THE DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, AS A PRO SE LITIGANT.
THERE ARE NO PAID OR UNPAID PROFESSIONALS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THIS CHAPTER 11
BANKRUPTCY FILING.

The following chart lists the Debtor=s estimated administrative expenses, and their proposed
treatment under the Plan:
THERE WILL BE NO ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENSES CHARGED TO THIS BANKRUPTCY. THE
DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, HANDLES ALL OF THE EXPENSES AS PRO SE BILLINGS
AND HAS RECENTLY CHARGED THEM TO DIRECTOR JAMES, COMEY OF THE FBI.
Paid in full on the effective date of the Plan Other administrative expenses Paid in full on the effective date
of the Plan or according to separate written agreement Office of the U.S. Trustee Fees Paid in full on the
effective date of the Plan
ANY EXPENSES TAKEN BY THE OFFICE OF THE US TRUSTEE IS LEGAL EXTORTION, CONSIDING
THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND WILL BE CONTESTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW.
2. Priority Tax Claims

Priority tax claims are unsecured income, employment, and other taxes described by
507(a)(8) of the Code. Unless the holder of such a 507(a)(8) priority tax claim agrees otherwise, it
must receive the present value of
THERE ARE NO PRIORITY TAX CLAIMS. THE DEBTOR HAS NOT HAD ANY TAXABLE INCOME
SINCE 2002.
C. Classes of Claims and Equity Interests

The following are the classes set forth in the Plan, and the proposed treatment that they will
receive under the Plan:
1. Classes of Secured Claims
Allowed Secured Claims are claims secured by property of the Debtor=s bankruptcy estate (or
that are subject to setoff) to the extent allowed as secured claims under 506 of the Code. If the value
of the collateral or setoffs securing the creditors claim is less than the amount of the creditors
allowed claim, the deficiency will [be classified as a general unsecured claim].
THERE ARE NO SECURED CLAIMS
The following chart lists all classes containing Debtor=s secured prepetition claims and their
proposed treatment under the Plan:
THERE ARE NO SECURED CLAIMS
2. Classes of Priority Unsecured Claims

Certain priority claims that are referred to in 507(a)(1), (4), (5), (6), and (7) of the Code are
required to be placed in classes. The Code requires that each holder of such a claim receive cash on
the effective date of the Plan equal to the allowed amount of such claim. However, a class of holders
of such claims may vote to accept different treatment.
THERE ARE NO PRIORITY UNSECURED CLAIMS
The following chart lists all classes containing claims under 507(a)(1), (4), (5), (6), and
(a)(7) of the Code and their proposed treatment under the Plan:
THERE ARE ONLY ONE CLASS OF UNSECURED CLAIMS
4. Class[es] of Equity Interest Holders

THERE ARE ONLY 4 SHAREHOLDERS WITH 4,000 SHARES TOTAL TO THE 996,000 OWNED BY
THE DEBTOR FOR ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, Ltd., THE OTHER COMPANIES THAT THE DEBTOR,
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE HAD REGISTERED AND INCORPORATED ARE FOR FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT GROUP, LTD., AND IT'S SUBSIDIARIES AND THE DEBTOR HAD NOT RESEARCHED
THE CURRENT OWNERSHIP. THE DEBTOR IS THE SOLE REGISTRANT IN 1986.

The Plan, in Exhibit 5.1, lists all executory contracts and unexpired leases that the Debtor will
assume under the Plan. Assumption means that the Debtor has elected to continue to perform the
obligations under such contracts and unexpired leases, and to cure defaults of the type that must be
cured under the Code, if any. Exhibit 5.1 also lists how the Debtor will cure and compensate the other
party to such contract or lease for any such defaults.
If you object to the assumption of your unexpired lease or executory contract, the proposed
cure of any defaults, or the adequacy of assurance of performance, you must file and serve your
objection to the Plan within the deadline for objecting to the confirmation of the Plan, unless the Court
has set an earlier time.
All executory contracts and unexpired leases that are not listed in Exhibit 5.1 will be rejected
under the Plan. Consult your adviser or attorney for more specific information about particular
contracts or leases.
If you object to the rejection of your contract or lease, you must file and serve your objection to
the Plan within the deadline for objecting to the confirmation of the Plan.
[The Deadline for Filing a Proof of Claim Based on a Claim Arising from the Rejection of a
Lease or Contract Is . Any claim based on the rejection of a contract or lease will be barred if
the proof of claim is not timely filed, unless the Court orders otherwise.]
THERE ARE NONE
G. Tax Consequences of Plan

Creditors and Equity Interest Holders Concerned with How the Plan May Affect Their Tax
Liability Should Consult with Their Own Accountants, Attorneys, And/Or Advisors.
The following are the anticipated tax consequences of the Plan: [List the following general
consequences as a minimum: (1)Tax consequences to the Debtor of the Plan; (2) General tax
consequences on creditors of any discharge, and the general tax consequences of receipt of plan
consideration after confirmation.]
NONE
IV. CONFIRMATION REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES

To be confirmable, the Plan must meet the requirements listed in 1129(a) or (b) of the Code.
These include the requirements that: the Plan must be proposed in good faith; at least one impaired
class of claims must accept the plan, without counting votes of insiders; the Plan must distribute to
each creditor and equity interest holder at least as much as the creditor or equity interest holder would
receive in a chapter 7 liquidation case, unless the creditor or equity interest holder votes to accept the
Plan; and the Plan must be feasible. These requirements are not the only requirements listed in 1129,
and they are not the only requirements for confirmation.
A. Who May Vote or Object

Any party in interest may object to the confirmation of the Plan if the party believes that the
requirements for confirmation are not met.
Many parties in interest, however, are not entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. A
creditor or equity interest holder has a right to vote for or against the Plan only if that creditor or equity
interest holder has a claim or equity interest that is both (1) allowed or allowed for voting purposes and
(2) impaired.
In this case, the Plan Proponent believes that classes are impaired and that holders of
claims in each of these classes are therefore entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. The Plan
Proponent believes that classes are unimpaired and that holders of claims in each of these
classes, therefore, do not have the right to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
1. What Is an Allowed Claim or an Allowed Equity Interest?
Only a creditor or equity interest holder with an allowed claim or an allowed equity interest has
the right to vote on the Plan. Generally, a claim or equity interest is allowed if either (1) the Debtor
has scheduled the claim on the Debtor=s schedules, unless the claim has been scheduled as disputed,

contingent, or unliquidated, or (2) the creditor has filed a proof of claim or equity interest, unless an
objection has been filed to such proof of claim or equity interest. When a claim or equity interest is
not allowed, the creditor or equity interest holder holding the claim or equity interest cannot vote
unless the Court, after notice and hearing, either overrules the objection or allows the claim or equity
interest for voting purposes pursuant to Rule 3018(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.
The deadline for filing a proof of claim in this case was .
[If applicable The deadline for filing objections to claims is______.]
2. What Is an Impaired Claim or Impaired Equity Interest?

As noted above, the holder of an allowed claim or equity interest has the right to vote only if it
is in a class that is impaired under the Plan. As provided in 1124 of the Code, a class is considered
impaired if the Plan alters the legal, equitable, or contractual rights of the members of that class.
3. Who is Not Entitled to Vote

The holders of the following five types of claims and equity interests are not entitled to vote:
holders of claims and equity interests that have been disallowed by an order of the
Court;
holders of other claims or equity interests that are not allowed claims or allowed
equity interests (as discussed above), unless they have been allowed for voting
purposes.
holders of claims or equity interests in unimpaired classes;
holders of claims entitled to priority pursuant to 507(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(8) of the
Code; and
holders of claims or equity interests in classes that do not receive or retain any value
under the Plan;
administrative expenses.
Even If You Are Not Entitled to Vote on the Plan, You Have a Right to Object to the
Confirmation of the Plan [and to the Adequacy of the Disclosure Statement].
4. Who Can Vote in More Than One Class

A creditor whose claim has been allowed in part as a secured claim and in part as an unsecured
claim, or who otherwise hold claims in multiple classes, is entitled to accept or reject a Plan in each
capacity, and should cast one ballot for each claim.
B. Votes Necessary to Confirm the Plan

If impaired classes exist, the Court cannot confirm the Plan unless (1) at least one impaired
class of creditors has accepted the Plan without counting the votes of any insiders within that class, and
(2) all impaired classes have voted to accept the Plan, unless the Plan is eligible to be confirmed by
Acram down@ on non-accepting classes, as discussed later in Section [B.2.].
1. Votes Necessary for a Class to Accept the Plan

A class of claims accepts the Plan if both of the following occur: (1) the holders of more than
one-half (1/2) of the allowed claims in the class, who vote, cast their votes to accept the Plan, and (2)
the holders of at least two-thirds (2/3) in dollar amount of the allowed claims in the class, who vote,
cast their votes to accept the Plan. A class of equity interests accepts the Plan if the holders of at least
two-thirds (2/3) in amount of the allowed equity interests in the class, who vote, cast their votes to
accept the Plan.
2. Treatment of Nonaccepting Classes

Even if one or more impaired classes reject the Plan, the Court may nonetheless confirm the
Plan if the nonaccepting classes are treated in the manner prescribed by 1129(b) of the Code. A plan
that binds nonaccepting classes is commonly referred to as a Acram down@ plan. The Code allows the
Plan to bind nonaccepting classes of claims or equity interests if it meets all the requirements for

consensual confirmation except the voting requirements of 1129(a)(8) of the Code, does not
Adiscriminate unfairly,@ and is Afair and equitable@ toward each impaired class that has not voted to
accept the Plan.
You should consult your own attorney if a Acramdown@ confirmation will affect your claim or
equity interest, as the variations on this general rule are numerous and complex.
C. Liquidation Analysis
To confirm the Plan, the Court must find that all creditors and equity interest holders who do
not accept the Plan will receive at least as much under the Plan as such claim and equity interest
holders would receive in a chapter 7 liquidation. A liquidation analysis is attached to this Disclosure
Statement as Exhibit E.
D. Feasibility
The Court must find that confirmation of the Plan is not likely to be followed by the
liquidation, or the need for further financial reorganization, of the Debtor or any successor to the
Debtor, unless such liquidation or reorganization is proposed in the Plan.
1. Ability to Initially Fund Plan
The Plan Proponent believes that the Debtor will have enough cash on hand on the effective
date of the Plan to pay all the claims and expenses that are entitled to be paid on that date. Tables
showing the amount of cash on hand on the effective date of the Plan, and the sources of that cash
are attached to this disclosure statement as Exhibit F.
2. Ability to Make Future Plan Payments And Operate Without Further Reorganization
The Plan Proponent must also show that it will have enough cash over the life of the Plan to
make the required Plan payments.
The Plan Proponent has provided projected financial information. Those projections are listed
in Exhibit G.
The Plan Proponents financial projections show that the Debtor will have an aggregate annual
average cash flow, after paying operating expenses and post-confirmation taxes, of $ . The final
Plan payment is expected to be paid on .
[Summarize the numerical projections, and highlight any assumptions that are not in accord with
past experience. Explain why such assumptions should now be made.]
THERE WILL BE NO CASHFLOW UNTIL SETTELMENTS ARE REACHED. THERE WILL BE NO
DISTRIBUTIONS TO THIS BANKRUPTCY PLAN UNTIL 100% OF THE THE DEBTOR, STAN J.
CATERBONE, PRO SE, PRO SE BILLINGS AND ACCOUNTS RECIEVABLES ARE COLLECTED IN
FULL.
You Should Consult with Your Accountant or other Financial Advisor If You Have Any
Questions Pertaining to These Projections.
V.EFFECT OF CONFIRMATION OF PLAN
A. NO DISCHARGE OF DEBTOR [If the Debtor is not entitled to discharge pursuant to 11

U.S.C. 1141(d)(3) change this heading to NO DISCHARGE OF DEBTOR.]
[Option 1 If Debtor is an individual and 1141(d)(3) is not applicable]
Discharge. Confirmation of the Plan does not discharge any debt provided for in the Plan until
the court grants a discharge on completion of all payments under the Plan, or as otherwise provided in
1141(d)(5) of the Code. Debtor will not be discharged from any debt excepted from discharge under
523 of the Code, except as provided in Rule 4007(c) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

[Option 2 -- If the Debtor is a partnership and 1141(d)(3) of the Code is not

applicable]
Discharge. On the effective date of the Plan, the Debtor shall be discharged from any debt that
arose before confirmation of the Plan, subject to the occurrence of the effective date, to the extent
specified in 1141(d)(1)(A) of the Code. However, the Debtor shall not be discharged from any debt
imposed by the Plan. After the effective date of the Plan your claims against the Debtor will be limited
to the debts imposed by the Plan.
[Option 3 -- If the Debtor is a corporation and 1141(d)(3) is not applicable]

Discharge. On the effective date of the Plan, the Debtor shall be discharged from any debt that
arose before confirmation of the Plan, subject to the occurrence of the effective date, to the extent
specified in 1141(d)(1)(A) of the Code, except that the Debtor shall not be discharged of any debt (i)
imposed by the Plan, (ii) of a kind specified in 1141(d)(6)(A) if a timely complaint was filed in
accordance with Rule 4007(c) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, or (iii) of a kind
specified in 1141(d)(6)(B). After the effective date of the Plan your claims against the Debtor will
be limited to the debts described in clauses (i) through (iii) of the preceding sentence.
[Option 4 If 1141(d)(3) is applicable]

No Discharge. In accordance with 1141(d)(3) of the Code, the Debtor will not receive any
discharge of debt in this bankruptcy case.
B. Modification of Plan
The Plan Proponent may modify the Plan at any time before confirmation of the Plan.
However, the Court may require a new disclosure statement and/or revoting on the Plan.
[If the Debtor is not an individual, add the following: AThe Plan Proponent may also seek to modify the
Plan at any time after confirmation only if (1) the Plan has not been substantially consummated and (2)
the Court authorizes the proposed modifications after notice and a hearing.@]
[If the Debtor is an individual, add the following: AUpon request of the Debtor, the United
States trustee, or the holder of an allowed unsecured claim, the Plan may be modified at any time after
confirmation of the Plan but before the completion of payments under the Plan, to (1) increase or
reduce the amount of payments under the Plan on claims of a particular class, (2) extend or reduce the
time period for such payments, or (3) alter the amount of distribution to a creditor whose claim is
provided for by the Plan to the extent necessary to take account of any payment of the claim made
other than under the Plan.@]
C. Final Decree

Once the estate has been fully administered, as provided in Rule 3022 of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure, the Plan Proponent, or such other party as the Court shall designate in the Plan
Confirmation Order, shall file a motion with the Court to obtain a final decree to close the case.
Alternatively, the Court may enter such a final decree on its own motion.
VI. OTHER PLAN PROVISIONS
[Insert other provisions here, as necessary and appropriate.]
Respectfully submitted,
By: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, THE DEBTOR

The Plan Proponent
By: NONE
Attorney for the Plan Proponent

EXHIBITS
INTERNET LINKS OF INTEREST
ERIC COHEN AND ROBERT BERUBE, Federal Public Defender for Esteban Santiago, Ft. Lauderdale Shooter,
INVOICE AND FEE SCHEDULE January 20, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/337072519/ERIC-COHEN-Federal-Public-Defender-for-Esteban-
Santiago-Ft-Lauderdale-Shooter-INVOICE-AND-FEE-SCHEDULE-January-20-2017
STAN CATERBONE NAMED AMICUS FOR KATHLEEN KANE Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 3575
EDA 2016 FRIDAY JANUARY 20, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/337120127/STAN-CATERBONE-NAMED-AMICUS-FOR-
KATHLEEN-KANE-Superior-Court-of-Pennsylvania-Case-No-3575-EDA-2016-FRIDAY-JANUARY-20-
2017
WHISTLEBLOWERS KAREN STEWART AND STAN CATERBONE A Candid Discussion of Electronic

Harassment Protocols, January 11, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336256943/WHISTLEBLOWERS-KAREN-STEWART-AND-STAN-
CATERBONE-A-Candid-Discussion-of-Electronic-Harassment-Protocols-January-11-2017
The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking Program

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/surreptitious-reincarnation-cointelpro-cops-program-stan-
caterbone
Video: Media Blacks Out Edward Snowdens Talk On COINTELPRO & History Of Mass Surveillance
http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-media-blacks-out-edward-snowdens-talk-on-cointelpro-
history-of-mass-surveillance/224222/
Letters: Snowden deserves pardon by John and Bonnie Raines, Philadelphia of the Citizens Commission to
Investigate the FBI in 1971
http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20170119_Letters__Snowden_deserves_pardon.html
Legal Implications of the Soviet Microwave Bombardment of the U.S. Embassy

https://www.scribd.com/document/336787302/Legal-Implications-of-the-1959-Soviet-Microwave-
Bombardment-of-the-U-S-Embassy-January-17-2017
Congressman Robert Walker Pleading July 7 1991 Important

https://www.scribd.com/document/270267368/Congressman-Robert-Walker-Pleading-July-7-
1991-Important
That time the CIA was convinced a self-proclaimed psychic had paranormal abilities
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/01/19/that-time-the-cia-was-
convinced-a-self-proclaimed-psychic-had-paranormal-abilities/?
postshare=8421484844095309&tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.b487b6ae00e7
Obama's most enduring legacy may be the establishment of the modern US surveillance state
http://www.businessinsider.com/obamas-most-enduring-legacy-the-modern-us-surveillance-state-
2017-1
The Extortion of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pa by COINTELPRO PROGRAMS January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336832214/The-Extortion-of-220-Stone-Hill-Road-Conestoga-
Pa-by-COINTELPRO-PROGRAMS-January-17-2017
AMG LEGAL SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE Mastered on April 16, 1991 at Commadore Inc., January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787897/AMG-LEGAL-SYSTEMS-PROTOTYPE-Mastered-on-April-16-1991-at-
Commadore-Inc-January-17-2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., 1993 to 1998 January 17, 2017

https://www.scribd.com/document/336787739/Stan-J-Caterbone-Controller-of-Pflumm-Contractors-Inc-1993-to-
1998-January-17-2017
Sam Lombardo and Raolph Mazzochi Charlotte Street Proposal by Advanced Media Group and Stan J.
Caterbone January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787416/Sam-Lombardo-and-Raolph-Mazzochi-Charlotte-Street-Proposal-by-
Advanced-Media-Group-and-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-17-2017
B2B Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16, 2017

https://www.scribd.com/document/336787303/B2B-Consulting-From-1999-to-2002-January-16-2017
1999 Excelsior Place Business Plan by Stan J. Caterbone January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336719627/1999-Excelsior-Place-Business-Plan-by-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-16-
2017
Stan J. Caterbone AIM MUTUAL FUNDS Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336738750/Stan-J-Caterbone-AIM-MUTUAL-FUNDS-Consulting-From-1999-to-
2002-January-16-2017
Pro Financial Group Brochure and Eastern Regional Free Agent Camp by Stan J. Caterbone January 16,
2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336704842/Pro-Financial-Group-Brochure-and-Eastern-Regional-Free-Agent-
Camp-by-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-16-2017
STAN J. CATERBONE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP JOINT VENTURE WITH DALE HIGH January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637179/56-STAN-J-CATERBONE-ADVANCED-MEDIA-GROUP-JOINT-VENTURE-
WITH-DALE-HIGH-January-15-2017
Institutional Investors Mortgage Banking Business Development of 1987 January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637178/58-Institutional-Investors-Mortgage-Banking-Business-Development-
of-1987-January-15-2017
1987 JOINT VENTURE - Tony Bongiovi, Power Station Studios, and Flatbush Films with Stan J. Caterbone
January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637176/55-1987-JOINT-VENTURE-Tony-Bongiovi-Power-Station-Studios-and-
Flatbush-Films-with-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-15-2017
STAN J. CATERBONE'S Financial Management Group, Ltd., Anti-Trust Litigation File of October 17, 2015
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637173/57-STAN-J-CATERBONE-S-Financial-Management-Group-Ltd-Anti-
Trust-Litigation-File-of-October-17-2015
FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence Agencies November 12, 2016
https://www.scribd.com/document/329761557/FALSE-IMPRISONMENT-AND-ILLEGAL-INTERROGATIONS-by-U-S-
Intelligence-Agencies-and-U-S-Sponsored-Mind-Control-EVIDENCE-November-2-2016
Scribd
Letter REQUEST for COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to President Obama, November 15, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone and Conflicts With the Trump Administration - Monday November 14, 2016 | False Claims Act |
Military
STAN J. CATERBONE and the DEPARTMENT of DEFENSE Documents and Evidence of Conspiracy to .... Saturday
November 12, 2016
Feds Probe Fulton Bank and 3 Other Subsidiary Banks of Fulton Financial With Stan J. Caterbone Civil Actions and
Mind Control Research of Monday November 9, 2016 | Robert Gates

Letter to James Comey, Director of FBI Re Cointelpro Used to Obstruct Justice Monday November 28, 2016 | Federal
Bureau Of Investigation | Central Intelligence Agency
VITALLY IMPORTANT - LETTER and DOCUMENT to Cappello & Noel, LLP of Santa Barbara, CA Friday November 25,
2016
Report of Douglas F Gansler/Kathleen Kane on Misuse of Commonwealth Email Systems November 22, 2016 Published
by ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP |
Pro Se Legal Representation In The United States | Motion In United States Law
Lancaster Mayor Rick Gray Says There is Room for Improvement in Police Communication - CATERBONE v. Lancaster
City Police Bureau, et.al., November 22, 2016 | Central Intelligence Agency
Chapter 12 - ROHYPNOL AND SATELLITE and Chapter 11 - NEIGHBORS FROM HELL, from Satellite Terrorism in
America, by Dr. John Hall Copyright 2009
| J. Edgar Hoover | Federal Bureau Of Investigation
JIM GUERIN, FOUNDER OF ISC, FAREWELL LETTER OF 1989 December 26, 2016 | Justice | Government
CHRISTOPHER PATTERSON Candidate for JUDGESHIP and His 1987 EFFORT FOR MY GUARDIANSHIP Friday December
16, 2016
ANOTHER LANCASTER COVER-UP THE SALE OF THE MASONIC HALL IN THE CITY OF LANCASTER, by The Advanced
Media Group, December 15, 2016 | Fraternal Service Organizations
Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com TOTALS and MONTHLY From May of 2016 to January
2017 - January 10, 2017
My Friend and Colleague Soleilmavis Liu of China a Victim of Mind Control Living in China Who Started Peacepink-
August 28, 2016
TD Ameritrade TRADEKEEPER PROFIT-LOSS FOR 2004 TRADES and 2017 FULTON STOCK January 9, 2017
POLICE INCIDENT REPORTS OF PHYSICAL ASSAULTS FOR STAN J. CATERBONE 2005 TO 2016 January 6, 2017
Judiciaries
UPDATED STATEMENT OF FACTS re CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Department US District Court Case 08-cv-
08982 December 28, 2016
Section 504 Of The Rehabilitation Act | Rehabilitation Act Of 1973
UPDATED - EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies as Targeted Individuals of U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control and Related Hearings and Lectures, December 27, 2016
Torture

Exhibit A B Copy of Proposed Plan of Reorganization

Exhibit B B Identity and Value of Material Assets of Debtor

Exhibit C B Prepetition Financial Statements

(to be taken from those filed with the court)

Exhibit D B [Most Recently Filed Postpetition Operating Report][Summary of Postpetition

Operating Reports]

Exhibit E Liquidation Analysis

Plan Proponents Estimated Liquidation Value of Assets
Assets

Exhibit F Cash on hand on the effective date of the Plan

Cash on hand on effective date of the Plan:
Less B

B25B (Official Form 25B) (12/08) Cont. 24

Exhibit G B Projections of Cash Flow and Earnings for Post-Confirmation Period


USPS LABEL - STAN J. CATERBONE MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Re NOISE TOO LOUD - NOTICE OF APPEAL FOR TRIAL DE NOVO February 18, 2017

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

USPS LABEL - STAN J. CATERBONE MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Re NOISE TOO LOUD - NOTICE OF APPEAL FOR TRIAL DE NOVO February 18, 2017

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Stan J.

LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

NOTICE OF APPEAL FOR TRIAL DE NOVO

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page 1 of 90

ACTIVE COURT CASES

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page 2 of 90

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page 3 of 90 Saturday February 18, 2017

Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief

AFFIDAVIT ACCOMPANYING MOTION

Affidavit in Support of Motion Instructions

My issues on appeal are:

Income source Average monthly Amount expected next

Total monthly income: $ $ $ $

Employer Address Dates of employment Gross

Employer Address Dates of employment Gross

4. How much cash do you and your spouse have? $________

Financial Institution Type of Account Amount you have Amount your

Home Other real estate Motor vehicle #1

Motor vehicle #2 Other assets Other assets

Name [or, if a minor (i.e., underage), initials only] Relationship Age

You Your Spouse

Yes No If yes, describe on an attached sheet.

If yes, how much? $ ____________

If yes, how much? $ ____________

( )* # " + # " , + ( - ./*0

1 ' 2 3 - 45* **0 67

' 2 37-7 -.6 0/

((( &&" " ! & )#

1 ) "" # " ! -2..-+.-32.4 567$,7- --8

# ! $ " ! % " & % % ' ( ) &" % !

: ) !' '! % ( ) $" " ( /" ' ! !

& " % ! " 8 /" =@A5,+B $ " ) A "!8 , !

Letter to Chris Reeser re ALLSTATE

% ) " ! /' " " %% $ " .

=' 6 . : % ' ' ! " ) " . &

1" ( / ' ! !! ; !' 63 3 . .

0 !! " !' " !) " '. ) / # 4 ) ," ) % '

0 !! ) & " % ! !' % % " " % " "

($ ' ' ! $ ' #" ! ! ( )) =! "' 67$,7- -- (

Letter to Chris Reeser re ALLSTATE

/ ! $ '? "" # 1 " ! -2..-+.-32.4

, % ' / " " 4 % % ) % ' *+,-, !

((( &&" " ! & )#

Letter to Chris Reeser re ALLSTATE

-BC.+CD---3 ??!# ? / ! # ! = # ! $ ! 9/! ! # !

9/! ! # ! ? )) " + . 3< / ) .. < F ) #'

! !# ! " ! !# ? .+C# C.>3. 9 9

( " / ? '" ! !#! " # < G ,-.+C2+,

'" ! ) + .< = : # '

) ! ? '" ! + . = "! ! ' & #'

: # ' ? " + . & 3< "! ! '

< F ) #' ? 9/ ! !# ? '" ! .+C.-.3>

Letter to Chris Reeser re ALLSTATE

((( &&" " ! & )#

& **$ *+,-

. ! $ '/ "" # 0 " ! +1,,+-,+21,3

" " (( - ( ( -,- ( 4 "" # " !

((( &&" " ! & )#

Letter to Chris Reeser re ALLSTATE

SCHEDULE OF ARTICLES STOLEN, DAMAGED OR DESTROYED

CLAIM NUMBER: M0-599782

ITEM WHERE DATE COST TO COST TO DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ALLOWED

LeadTech Video Capture Cyberwarehouse, Lancaster, PA 14-Sep-05 169.99