Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2. Convertibility
q Gives bondholder option to convert the bond, typically into
stock
n Convertibles sell at a premium relative to non-convertible bonds
3. Putability
q Allows bondholder to sell the bond back to the firm
n An option to the bondholder: putable bonds sell at a premium
relative to non-putable bonds
t
n For fixed
F Vt income
= P V0 securities without default risk
(1 + r )
(Treasuries), cash flows are certain:
3 E(Di) = Di:
= $10, 000 (1 + 0.05) = $11, 576.25
D1 D2 D3
P = + 2
+ 3
+ ...
(1 + r ) (1 + r ) (1 + r )
q We discount all future casht flows to present at a constant
P V0 (1 + r )
F Vt =rate
discount
3
= $10, 000 (1 + 0.05) = $11, 576.25
F Vt = P V0 (1 + r )t
FIN 411: Fixed Income = $10, 000 Prof.
(1Dmitry
+ 0.05)
Orlov
3 = $11, 576.25 14
Pricing F.I. Securities
n Fixed income security valuation is simple: its just
discounting
q Only need to worry about using the correct discount rate
n Note: from now on, unless specified otherwise, assume that all rates (i.e.,
coupons and discount rates) are annual.
n Example.CA1 three-yearCzero
2 couponCbond
3 withFa+face
C4 value of $1,000
=
P trading
is +
at $868.79. What2is+the three-year
3
+ spot rate?
(1 + r1) (1 + r2) (1 + r3) (1 + r4)4
1 1
$50 F t $50 $1, 000 3 $50 $1, 000 + $50
= r= + 1= 2
+ 1 = 34.8%
+
$868.79
1 + 0.02P (1 + 0.0225) (1 + 0.024) (1 + 0.025)4
1
= $49.02
C1 + $47.82
C2 + $46.57 C3 + $951.25 F +=
C4$1, 094.66
PFIN=
411: Fixed Income +
2
+ Prof. Dmitry Orlov
3
+ 4
17
Treasury Strips. Notation
1+
= $1, 0.02 (1 + 0.0225)
217.35 2 (1 + 0.024) 3 (1 + 0.025)4
= $49.02 + $47.82 + $46.57 + $951.25 = $1, 094.66
FIN 411: Fixed Income Prof. Dmitry Orlov 21
Spot Rates Revisited
n We could also get the spot rates from coupon bonds
q Need to iterate: compute the 1-year spot rate, look at the 2-
year coupon bond to get the 2-year spot rate, look at the 3-
year
q This is known as bootstrapping
n Not the same meaning as in statistics
$100 $100
gives the correct price?
n Difference is the difference between the actual bond price and the
price we get with our yield-to-maturity (YTM) guess
C1 C2 CT
Pactual = + 2
+ +
(1 + y ) (1 + y ) (1 + y )T
q If the bond is trading at par, YTM is the same as the coupon rate
q Example. A 5-year bond with a coupon rate of 7.25% is trading at par,
what is the bonds yield to maturity?
B1
n Answer: YTM = $997.50
7.25% = $1, 050
$100
n This observation also gives us B1another tool:
B2 even if a bond is not
trading at par, we $1,know
048.00if=the YTM $80is+higher
$1, 080
$100 $100 or lower than the
coupon rate
1
q Bond price higher than face, then bonds YTM is lower than the coupon
rate
n Why? Future dollars must be more valuable, i.e., the discount rate lower, to
get a higher present value
q Bond price lower than face, then bonds YTM is higher than the coupon
rate
6%
5%
Spot Rate
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Maturity (in years)
n If spot rates and forward rates did not satisfy a certain relationship,
you could create a strategy that generated positive profits with no
risk
q This is the first example of no-arbitrage condition
n Definition of arbitrage: a risk-free, zero-net investment
strategy that generates a profit (a free lunch)
n NA is one of the most celebrated concepts in finance
q General assumption: if there were an arbitrage opportunity,
someone would trade aggressively on it, making it go away
n NA is used to price all kinds of assets,
q And in particular, derivative securities (Black-Scholes)
n Answer: Can loan $10,000 risk-free for two years two ways:
1. Invest the money for two years at the 2-year spot rate
2. Invest the money for one year at the 1-year spot rate,
and lock in the forward rate from year 1 to year 2
n As soon as you get the money back after one year, you roll it
over
n Note: All the rates are locked in today. No matter what
happens next year, the forward rate is already fixed
n So
$10, 000(1 + r2)2 = $10, 000(1 + r1)(1 + f1,2)
(1 + r2)2
) (1 + f1,2) =
1 + r1
B1
) f1,2 = 1
B2
1n + f1,2 =
Yield curve upward
=
sloping
(1 + r
expectation 2 ) > 1 +
hypothesis
r2
1 + r1 1 + r1
says that spot rates are expected to rise
q Why? Assume that r2 > r1 (upward sloping yield curve):
(1 + r2)2 1 + r2
1 + f1,2 = = (1 + r2) > 1 + r2
1 + r1 1 + r1
) f1,2 > r2 and r2 > r1
FIN 411: Fixed Income Prof. Dmitry Orlov 40
Alternative Hypotheses
Why might f1,2 be different expected spot rates?
n Liquidity preference theory:
q Most investors dont want to tie their capital for long periods of
time (need liquidity), so long term rates must compensate for
lack of liquidity
q If so,
forward rate = E[spot rate] + liquidity premium
q Suppose a )
5-yearf1,2
bond> r2 and r2 > r1
with annual 8% coupons is trading at
1
n The next step is to find the present values of each payment. These
present values are$997.50
$75.56,=
$71.37,
B1 $67.42, $63.68, and $811.97.
$1, 050
q You can verify that they sum$100
up to $1,090as they should, because the
price of a bond$1,
is the B
sum=of the B2
present
$80 + value
$1,of080
the cash flow stream
1
048.00
$100 $100
Imply PV weights are 0.0693, 0.0655, , 0.7449.
1
= 4.34 years
n
(1 + r2)2 1 + r2
1 + f1,2 = = (1 + r2) > 1 + r2
1 + r1 1+2 r1 T
dP 1 C/(1 + y ) C(1 + y ) (F + C)/(1 + y )
= ) f1,2 >+r22 and r2 > r1+ + T P
dy 1+y P P P
1
1 1
P Dur P y = 7.2469 $1, 000 0.05% = 3.36
1+y 1.08
n Are we hedged?
q Suppose that rates increase by 1%:
n Value of the old portfolio changes
approximately
(4.611 / 1.06) * $91,575 * 1% = -$3,983.18.
n Value of the new portfolio changes
approximately by
(10 / 1.06) * (-$42,222) * 1% = $3,983.18.
n These approximate changes exactly offset each
other this is what we wanted
P 1 dP 1 1 d 2P 2
= y+ 2
y
P P dy 2 P dy
n Then
P C
= D y+ y2
P 2
P5 = 915.75 D5 = 4.61
n Bond holders like convexity.
P7 = 665.06 D7 = 7
n You 1 could also use convexity 1 to hedge better:
ge q Hedgefor Dur PPrate
bigger
=changes
y558.39 D Dur = hedge Phedge
10
1+y 10 1 + y 10
q Need y two bonds to match both duration and
= convexity (D P + Dhedge Phedge ) = 0
1+y
D
ge =FIN 411: Fixed Income P Prof. Dmitry Orlov 61
D
Simple example
Dur P y C P y 2
P +
1+y 2
23.9472 915.75 0.0001
= 39.83 +
2
= 39.83 + 1.10 = 38.73
q Have
P5 = 915.75 D5 = 4.61 C5 = 23.95
P7 = 665.06 D7 = 7 C7 = 49.84
q Solving gives
n7 = 1.561
n10 = 0.545
= 963.83
= 963.83
q Yields too high a price YTM > 3%
= 963.83
FIN 411: Fixed Income Prof. Dmitry Orlov 75
Grand Example, Continued