0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
253 Ansichten3 Seiten
The Canadian brewing industry is an $8 billion market dominated by Molson and Labatt but they have been losing share to microbreweries. Sleeman Breweries reopened in 1988 using original recipes and pursued growth through acquiring smaller brands to expand across Canada. They face risks of competition from the large players Molson and Labatt but see opportunities to use their management expertise and acquisition strategy to continue growing.
The Canadian brewing industry is an $8 billion market dominated by Molson and Labatt but they have been losing share to microbreweries. Sleeman Breweries reopened in 1988 using original recipes and pursued growth through acquiring smaller brands to expand across Canada. They face risks of competition from the large players Molson and Labatt but see opportunities to use their management expertise and acquisition strategy to continue growing.
The Canadian brewing industry is an $8 billion market dominated by Molson and Labatt but they have been losing share to microbreweries. Sleeman Breweries reopened in 1988 using original recipes and pursued growth through acquiring smaller brands to expand across Canada. They face risks of competition from the large players Molson and Labatt but see opportunities to use their management expertise and acquisition strategy to continue growing.
SLEEMAN BREWERIES CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENT Reyner Dsouza 101039628 Assess the Canadian brewing industry. What risks and opportunities exist?
Overview: Canadian Brewing industry is a massive industry that amounts to
nearly $8 billion in annual sales. It is a business where there is extreme competition among several micro-breweries and the domestic market also faces competition from imported breweries. Canadian brewing was dominated by Molson Breweries and Labatt Brewing Company. Despite the large market share of these two organizations, they have been losing market over the years to smaller microbreweries. This case study focuses on performance of Sleeman breweries to understand if is it safe to invest in such a business venture or whether we shouldnt invest in the same. Growth: Sleeman Breweries limited or SBL was a microbrewery that was shut down 1933 bur reopened again in 1988. While reopening, they used many original recipes that were used the founders originally. They saw the market shift and realized that one brand wouldnt sustain on long run and decided to work on acquiring and merging with various smaller brands. Their main aim was to grow in domestic Canadian market by targeting local microbreweries and exploit continued growth of import brands in North America using strategic alliances. This can be clearly seen in their ratios as their net income to profit and gross margin was way over what market expected. In their current plans it can be clearly seen that that they arent just looking at premium offerings, which is already doing well, but also targeting low cost markets as well. Competition: As discussed earlier, it can be clearly seen that that the there is a major competition in the local market among two major breweries and other microbreweries. Microbreweries started eating into market share of major breweries. Local market also fell by overall 0.2 percent in 1998 due to an increase in sales of imported bears. While major breweries had enough resources to put their focus on marketing, the same was not true for low cost beers and local breweries. Some micro-breweries only focused on their localized market Okanagan Springs which was available in B.C., Aberta and SK. Sleeman worked on bringing such micro brands together under one umbrella. Their major strength was not production but rather the way they managed their mergers and acquisitions. Risks:
Sleeman is a new entrant in a highly competitive market of a large $7
billion industry There is extreme competition from those who hold the current market shares Labatt and Molson have resources to market themselves aggressively against Sleeman As of 1996, there were 46 microbreweries which were growing year on year which new entrepreneurs Pbast Brewing company deal was not aligned with company goals
Opportunities:
SBL was rated as one of the Canadas top 50 managed companies
Great management capabilities Good control over diversifying assets from acquisitions Pbast Brewing company deal help them target new markets Great and stable net and gross income Excellent return on equity