Facts: Commission on Immigration and Deportation (CID) commenced deportation proceedings against William Gatchalian, an alleged Chinese citizen, for violating the Immigration Act. CID pointed out that the marriages of Williams grandfather, Santiago, (to Chu Gim Tee) and father, Francisco, (to Ong Chiu Kiok) in China were not supported by any evidence other than their self-serving testimony now was there any showing what the laws of China were. CID claims that for the said marriages to be valid in this country, it should have been shown that they were valid by the laws of China. There being no showing of the laws, they concluded that the marriages cannot be considered valid. Hence, Santiagos children followed the citizenship of their mother, having been born outside of a valid marriage. Similarly, the validity of Franciscos marriage not having been demonstrated, William followed the citizenship of his mother. Issue/s: WON the marriage of Gatchalian in China is valid in accordance with Philippine law YES Held: In absence of evidence to the contrary, foreign laws on a particular subject are presumed to be the same as those of the Philippines. This is known as Processual Presumption. In this case, there being no proof of Chinese law relating to marriage, there arises a presumption that it is the same as that of Philippine law. Philippine law, following the lex loci celebrationis, adheres to the rule that marriage formally valid where celebrated is valid everywhere. Having declared the assailed marriage is valid, William Gatchalian follows the citizenship of his father, a Filipino citizen.