Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Table of Contents i
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A Background of Research 1
CHAPTER II
DISCUSSION
CHAPTER III
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of Research
Social media is a brilliant tool that can be easily used by those who
have access to it. As access is gained globally, it creates opportunities to
those who are first experiencing the use to outsource ideas. 1 One of the
most used social media is Facebook.
1 Jessica Bieber, (2014), Impact of The Globalization of Social Media: The Role in
Euromaidan, retrieved in January 2nd 2016 from
https://medium.com/@jessbiebss/impact-of-the-globalization-of-social-media-
7f8e956c10ae#.ph56bqqqw.
2 Facebook Users in Indonesia Have Highest Mobile Usage Rate Worldwide,
(2015), retrieved in January 2nd 2016 from
https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Facebook-Users-Indonesia-Have-Highest-
Mobile-Usage-Rate-Worldwide/1011896.
1
female from elementary school until professor have Facebook account.
From uneducated until well-educated persons both also use Facebook.
Things that people usually post on Facebook are status of what they
are thinking or feeling, photos, videos, national and international news,
and also sarcastic postsboth in own status or comment of others status.
In this paper, only sarcastic posts will be the focus of this mini project.
2
displayed here is differences of sarcasm posted by people who is
educated and by those who have less knowledge and experiences. In
doing this, first thing that should be done is observing the common
ground of two Facebook users, then analyze the differences of their
sarcastic post.
3
CHAPTER II
DISCUSSION
1. Definition of Language
5 Robert Henry Robins and David Crystal, (2015), Language, retrieved in January
2nd 2016 from https://www.britannica.com/topic/language.
4
viewed the main function of language as the expression of thought.
Ancient Indian grammarians speak of the soul apprehending things with
the intellect and inspiring the mind with a desire to speak, and in the
Greek intellectual tradition Aristotle declared, Speech is the
representation of the experiences of the mind (On Interpretation). Such
an attitude passed into Latin theory and thence into medieval doctrine.
Medieval grammarians envisaged three stages in the speaking process:
things in the world exhibit properties; these properties are understood by
the minds of humans; and, in the manner in which they have been
understood, so they are communicated to others by the resources of
language. Rationalist writers on language in the 17th century gave
essentially a similar account: speaking is expressing thoughts by signs
invented for the purpose, and words of different classes (the different
parts of speech) came into being to correspond to the different aspects of
thinking.6
2. Function of Language
a. Language is Expressive
6 Ibid.
5
Verbal communication helps us meet various needs through our
ability to express ourselves. In terms of instrumental needs, we
use verbal communication to ask questions that provide us with
specific information. We also use verbal communication to
describe things, people, and ideas. Verbal communication helps
us inform, persuade, and entertain others, which as we will learn
later are the three general purposes of public speaking. It is also
through our verbal expressions that our personal relationships
are formed. At its essence, language is expressive. Verbal
expressions help us communicate our observations, thoughts,
feelings, and needs.7
b. Language is Powerful
The contemporary American philosopher David Abram wrote,
Only if words are felt, bodily presences, like echoes or
waterfalls, can we understand the power of spoken language
to influence, alter, and transform the perceptual world. This
statement encapsulates many of the powerful features of
language. The powerful of language expresses our identities,
affects our credibility, serves as a means of control, and
performs actions.8
c. Language is Fun
The productivity and limitlessness of language leads some
people to spend an inordinate amount of time discovering
things about words. Two examples that is found fascinating
are palindromes and contranyms. Palindromes, as noted, are
words that read the same from left to right and from right to
left. Racecar is a commonly cited example, but a little time
spent looking through Google results for palindromes exposes
many more, ranging from Live not on evil to Doc, note I
dissent. A fast never prevents a fatness. I diet on cod.
7 Matthew McKay, et.al., (1995), Messages: Communication Skills Book, 2nd ed,
(Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications), p. 3436.
8 David Abram, (1997), Spell of The Sensuous, New York: Vintage Books), p. 89.
6
Contranyms are words that have multiple meanings, two of
which are opposites. For example, sanction can mean to
allow and to prevent, and dust can mean to remove
particles when used in reference to furniture or to add
particles when used in reference to a cake. These are just
two examples of humorous and contradictory features of the
English language.
d. Language is Dynamic
As we already learned, language is essentially limitless. We
may create a one-of-a-kind sentence combining words in new
ways and never know it. Aside from the endless structural
possibilities, words change meaning, and new words are
created daily. In this section, well learn more about the
dynamic nature of language by focusing on neologisms and
slang.
e. Language is Relational
We use verbal communication to initiate, maintain, and
terminate our interpersonal relationships. The first few
exchanges with a potential romantic partner or friend help us
size the other person up and figure out if we want to pursue a
relationship or not. We then use verbal communication to
remind others how we feel about them and to check in with
themengaging in relationship maintenance through
language use. When negative feelings arrive and persist, we
often use verbal communication to end a relationship.9
3. Definition of Thought
7
thought is or how it is created. Thoughts may or may not arise in the mind
from the product of subconscious brain processing.10
8
argument in fact implies that thought is impossible without
language. Language is a carrier of thought, just like water is to
water waves. Without water acting as a medium, water waves
cannot possibly exist.12
2. On the other hand, some linguists hold that language and thought
are two separate and independent entities. The differences in the
syntactic structure and the lexicons available in different languages,
for example, cannot possibly determine the way these people think.
Thus we have thought in the very first place, and then language
came in as a tool for expressing our thought.
3. Some others, not feeling contented with either version, proposed
the third possibility that language and thought are interdependent.
Language is a regular part of the process of thinking it is not a
question of one notion taking precedence over the other, but of both
notions being essential.13
B. Theory of Sarcasm
9
paralinguistic profile that alerts the listener not to interpret the utterance
sincerely even in the absence of contextual information, in text
communications sarcasm can be conveyed solely through contextual cues
such as counterfactual or echoic statements. Sarcastic plays a role as an
interfering factor that can flip the polarity of a message. Unlike a simple
negation, sarcastic posts typically convey a negative opinion using only
positive words.
15 Christine Liebrecht, et.al, (2013), The Perfect Solution for Detecting Sarcasm
in Tweets #not, (Georgia: Association for Computational Linguistics), p. 29-30.
10
valence, we use Burgers definition of verbal irony in this study of
sarcasm, and we use both terms synonymously.16
16 Ibid., p. 30.
17 KJ Singh, (2010), What are The Types of Observation, retrieved in January 2nd
2016 from http://www.mbaofficial.com/mba-courses/research-methodology/what-
are-the-types-of-observation/.
11
CHAPTER III
CONCLUSION
12
commenter seemed decode and reply to it in literally, but actually he
responded by giving sarcasm also. This sarcastic comment delivered by
the second commenter involved a shift in evaluative valence, which is a
shift from a literally positive to an intended negative meaning.
The target of sarcasm directed in this post is the addressee. The first
commenter directed the sarcasm to the second commenter, and vice
versa.
Both two posts above seemed like simple questions, but if we know
the context of the contents being talked on those two posts, we will
definitely know that they were sarcasm. This kind of sarcasm is called
13
indirect sarcasm. Indirect sarcasm tends to use more polite words but has
sarcastic effect.
In the first post, the writer questioned about what will the very-
fresh-graduated students of senior high school do after their celebration
by painting their uniform. We know that their euphoriawhich is like all of
their life challenge already solvedis not worth it. Thus, the sarcastic
question like what the writer posted aimed to make those graduated
students realize that they still have many things to do in the future so do
not be drowning in that kind of euphoria.
In the second post, the writer talked about the style of hijab which is
becoming a trend nowadays among females in Indonesia. This style of
hijab does not appropriate with Islamic law that forbids any hair shown,
yet it is considered as trendy among them. Thus, the writer with his
sarcastic question wanted to deliver his opinion that females are not look
pretty and considered as trendy by following that kind of style.
The target of sarcasm directed in this post is the third party: high
school graduate students and female preferring that kind of hijab style.
14
Those posts above are direct sarcasm, which tends to use harsher
and sharper words. As stated before, knowledge and experience will affect
the way someone delivers sarcasm. The more knowledge someone has,
the more perceived politeness is increased, and the more negative
impressions of sarcasm are reduced. Proper knowledge will affect the
diction of someone, included the diction in delivering sarcasm.
B. Conclusion
15
If the speaker delivered sarcasm has good education background
and experience, the sarcasm he made would be politer but still has a
strong sarcastic effect. While ones who lack knowledge and experience
will have limited diction and tend to make direct sarcasm which is likely
harsher and sharper.
Based on the mini research that has be done, some people with
good education backgroundwhom being sample of this mini research
posted or commented by using indirect sarcasm instead of the direct one,
while people who lack knowledge and experience often posted sharp
direct sarcasm on their Facebook accounts.
The finding of this mini research goes along with the theory that
proposed by some experts which stated that thought is in the very first
place and then language came in as a tool for expressing our thought. It
means that thought controls and shapes what we say.
16
REFERENCES
Abram, David. 1997. Spell of The Sensuous. New York: Vintage Books
Robins, Robert Henry and David Crystal. 2015. Language. Retrieved from
https://www.
britannica.com/topic/language
17
Sarcasm-Understanding. 2016. Retrieved from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm
Singh, KJ. 2010. What are The Types of Observation. Retrieved from
http://www.mbaofficial
.com/mba-courses/research-methodology/what-are-the-types-of-
observation/
18