UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT MYERS DIVISION

DR. JORG BUSSE, JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT,

Plaintiffs,

versus Case # 2:10-CV-0089-FtM-JES-SPC

JOHN EDWIN STEELE; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL; ROGER ALEJO;

KENNETH M. WILKINSON; JACK N. PETERSON; GERALD BARD TJOFLAT;
RICHARD JESSUP; CIRCUIT JUDGE BIRCH; CIRCUIT JUDGE DUBINA;
RICHARD ALLAN LAZZARA; CHARLIE CRIST; LEE COUNTY VALUE
ADJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L. RUTLAND; EXECUTIVE TITLE CO.;
JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.,
Defendants.

EMERGENCY MOTION
____________________________________________________________________________/

EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENJOIN DEF. CROOKED JUDGE HONEYWELL FROM

STRIKING RECORD EVIDENCE OF HER CRIMES, PUBLISHED PUBLIC NOTICES,

CORRUPTION, AND FRAUD ON THE COURTS, DOC. ## 236, 213, 214

PUBLISHED PUBLIC NOTICES OF

CORRUPTION, FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT, AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

BY U.S. AGENTS IN THEIR PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES

UNDER COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT AND FAKE “LAW” [“O.R. 569/875”]

DEFENDANT HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL CRIME EVIDENCE,

DOCUMENTS ## 236, 213, 214, 07/02/10, 2:2009-CV-00791

1. For prima facie criminal purposes of, e.g., obstructing justice, and deliberately depriving &

defrauding the Plaintiff record owners of riparian Gulf-front Lot 15A [STRAP # 12-44-20-01-

00015.015A, PB 3 PG 25 (1912)], Defendant Crooked Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell

 “directed” the Clerk of Court, and conspired with other Defendants and Officials to “direct”

the Clerk, to fraudulently conceal record evidence of Defendant Honeywell’s crimes on the

public record, “Document 236, 07/02/10”, 2:2009-cv-00791:

DEF. CROOKED JUDGE HONEYWELL CONCEALED RECORD CRIME EVIDENCE

2. Here, said PUBLISHED PUBLIC NOTICES, “Documents ## 220, 221, 223, 225, 226, 229,

230, 232, 233, 234, 235”, had conclusively evidenced, e.g., record Government crimes,

corruption, extortion, bribery, fraud, and fraud on the Court under color of, e.g., a fake

“resolution”, facially forged “land parcels”, and fake “frivolity” claims. See also Doc. ## 213,

214; 2:2009-cv-00791.

3. Here, Crooked Judge Honeywell had no official right to act corruptly and pervert public record

evidence of Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable land and street ownership and title outside any judicial

immunity and scope.

DEFENDANT HONEYWELL HAD MULTIPLE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

4. Here, Defendant presiding crooked U.S. Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell had multiple

recorded conflicts of interest and fraudulently concealed, e.g., Government and judicial

corruption, extortion, fraud, bribery, conspiracy to defraud and deprive, and deliberate

deprivations on the record under color of fake “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and

“07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, facially forged “law” / “resolution” “O.R. 569/875”.

DEFENDANT HONEYWELL WAS OBJECTIVELY UNFIT, PARTIAL & CROOKED

2
5. Here no fit, rational, and honest judge could have possibly dismissed Plaintiffs’ Case(s) and

concocted “frivolity” and “vexatiousness” when the record had conclusively proven brazen

prima facie corruption, fraud, extortion, bribery, and facially forged “land parcels”.

DEFENDANT HONEYWELL FIXED PLAINTIFFS’ CASE # 2:09-CV-00791

6. Defendant Honeywell fixed Plaintiffs’ Case 2:2009-cv-00791 by fraudulently and idiotically

perverting the public record evidence of Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable ownership of and

marketable title to riparian Lot 15A “on the Gulf of Mexico”, STRAP # 12-44-20-01-

00015.015A as legally described and conveyed in reference to the 1912 “Cayo Costa”

Subdivision Plat in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25. See Doc. # 213; 2:2009-cv-00791.

PLAINTIFF RECORD LANDOWNERS SUED DEF. CORRUPT JUDGE HONEYWELL

7. EXPRESSLY, the Plaintiffs sued Defendant corrupt U.S. Judge Honeywell in her private

individual capacity, because Honeywell perpetrated, e.g., fraud, fraud on the Courts, fraudulent

concealment of Government corruption, which were outside the scope of her official capacity.

See Case # 2:2010-cv-00390.

PLAINTIFFS DIRECTLY ATTACKED HONEYWELL’S FRAUDULENT ORDERS

8. Here, the Plaintiffs directly attacked Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell’s facially fraudulent

orders and judgments, which were based on, e.g., record fabrications of, e.g., fake “land

parcels”, a fake “resolution” [“O.R.569/875”], and fake “frivolity” and “vexatiousness”

“defenses / claims”.

HONEYWELL’S ORDERS TO CONCEAL FRAUD & KEEP PLAINTIFFS AWAY

9. Just like a desperate and isolated criminal on the run, Honeywell can no longer hide and

cover up. In her facially fraudulent “order”, “Doc. # 236, 07/02/10”, corrupt Case Fixer

Honeywell perverted the law and fraudulently pretended under color of official right:

3
 “The Clerk is further directed to no longer accept ANY filings from Plaintiffs in
this case because a [facially fraudulent] judgment has been entered and Plaintiffs
have filed a notice of appeal as to the Court’s Order (Dkt. 213), and this case is
CLOSED [FIXED].”

“Finally, the Clerk is also directed to strike Published Public Notices from the record
(Dkt. 220, 221, 223, 225, 226, 229, 230, 232, 233, 234, 235).” See Doc. # 236, p. 3.

Here, Honeywell had no authority and/or official right to illegally fix Plaintiffs’ Case and

fraudulently conceal the record truth of, e.g., fake “land parcels” and a fake “resolution”, and

obstruct justice. Here, Defendant objectively crooked presiding Judge Honeywell evaded her

own prosecution by perpetrating fraud on the Court and making self-serving “orders”

such as, e.g., Doc. ## 213, 236.

HONEYWELL CONSPIRED WITH OTHER DEFENDANTS TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE

10. Here Defendant objectively partial and corrupt Judge Honeywell knew that the sued

Defendants could not possibly have, and of course had no immunity. However here, Defendant

Attorney Matthew L. Fesak deceived the Court by fraudulently and ignorantly pretending

“blanket immunity”. See Doc. # 29, p. 5. Furthermore, Defendant Attorney Matthew L. Fesak

materially misrepresented, id., p. 2:

“Plaintiff’s first case was not facially improper, but after a full and fair opportunity to
litigate their case, Plaintiffs’ complaint was dismissed as unripe because Plaintiffs had
not availed themselves of state remedies.”

Here, Defendant Judge Honeywell knew that bungling Defendant Attorney Fesak, North

Carolina Bar No. 35276, was unfamiliar with Florida property law. In particular, Honeywell

knew that Defendant Fesak was unfit and dishonest with regard to, e.g., Florida Statutes,

Chapters 73, 74, EMINENT DOMAIN; Ch. 95, ADVERSE POSSESSION; Ch. 712,

MARKETABLE RECORD TITLE ACT. Here, Defendants Honeywell and Fesak conspired with

other Defendants to perpetrate and/or perpetuate the other Defendants’ deception and trickery

4
 and conceal said record fake “land parcels”, said record fake “resolution” [“O.R. 569/875”],

and fake “condemnation” “claims”. No “state remedy” was ever identified here. Here,

Defendant Honeywell fraudulently concealed that the Plaintiffs could not be coerced into

pleading inverse condemnation, because the Plaintiffs categorically and rightfully defended

against any unlawful exchange of their title and the Government corruption and fraud on the

public record.

DEFENDANT “WHORE” HONEYWELL UPHELD “THE RULE OF RAPE”

11. Just like the Pope presided over a Church in which priests raped children and innocent victims,

here Defendant “legal whore” Honeywell presided over judicial rape, corruption, and extortion

under color of record fake “land parcels” and facially forged “law”. Just like psychopath

Catholic Church Officials, Honeywell covered up and concealed.

12. On the record, the Plaintiffs objected to Honeywell’s rule of Government rape. Here, the

record series of Defendant Honeywell’s idiotic illegal orders and judgment documented

Honeywell’s pattern and policy of NOT upholding but PERVERTING the law and acting like

a cheap “Government whore”. Here, Government Crook Honeywell swore on the bible with

the intent to rape innocent Plaintiffs and fraudulently conceal, e.g., U.S. corruption and said

forged “land parcels”.

IDIOTIC DEFENSES & CLAIMS OF “RIPENESS” REQUIREMENTS

13. Here, Defendant corrupt Judge Honeywell knew that the named party Defendants, Officials,

and/or Defendant Attorney Fesak knew that no ripeness requirements had ever existed in order

for Plaintiffs to plead, e.g., well-proven record fraud, corruption, extortion, bribery, and

deliberate 1st, 14th, 7th, and 4th U.S. Const. Amendment deprivations. Here, Defendants and

5
 their Attorney gave no explanation or justification, whatsoever, in support of their facially

idiotic “defenses”.

CONSPIRACY TO KEEP PLAINTIFFS AWAY FROM U.S. COURTS

14. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that Def. Fesak conspired with other Defendants to fraudulently

pretend “state remedies” which Fesak and the other Defendants and Officials knew to be a

prima facie hoax, because the Plaintiffs could of course plead their ripe claims for relief

directly in Federal Court. Fesak and the Defendant Officials knew and fraudulently concealed

that the Plaintiffs had no intent to exchange their unimpeachable record title but rightfully

defended their ownership against fraud, extortion, bribery, and corruption under color of fake

paper “O.R. 569/875”.

RECORD EMERGENCIES OF CORRUPTION, BRIBERY, AND FRAUD ON COURTS

15. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that the judicial and Government corruption, fraud, bribery, and

extortion on record were EMERGENCIES, because they violently injured the American

people. The Plaintiffs and American people had fundamental rights to be free of record brazen

idiotic Government oppression in State and Federal Courts since 2006. See, e.g., judicial and

Government concealment of facially fraudulent “land”, “parcel”, and “condemnation”

“claims” and “defenses” such as, e.g., “O.R. 569/875”.

PATTERN & POLICY OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ORDERS / JUDGMENTS

16. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that no intelligent and fit judge and/or official in the Defendants’

and Officials’ shoes could have possibly determined that Lee County had any “official right”

to “claim” “land” and illegally fabricate fake “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and

“07-44-21-01-00001.0000”. See Chapters 73, 74, EMINENT DOMAIN, Ch. 95, ADVERSE

POSSESSION; Ch. 712, MARKETABLE RECORD TITLE ACT.

6
 THE U.S. DEFENDANTS FRAUDULENTLY PRETENDED “UNRIPE” CLAIMS

ADMITTEDLY FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF “UNRIPE” CLAIMS

17. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that the judicial Defendants conceded the record fraud on the

Court that

“Plaintiffs’ complaint was dismissed as unripe, because Plaintiffs had not availed
themselves of state remedies.” See Doc. # 29, p. 2

Here admittedly, the Defendants knew and fraudulently concealed that fraud, corruption,

extortion, and bribery of course could of course be directly pleaded in Federal Court:

“must comply not only with … but also with Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b)’s heightened pleading
standard.” Id., p. 4.

Here, Def. Honeywell knew that the Plaintiffs had sued the Defendant crooked Government

Officials in STATE Court, and STATE Court Defendant U.S. Judges John E. Steele and Sheri

Polster Chappell themselves had removed Plaintiffs ripe legal action from STATE to Federal

Court. Here, Federal jurisdiction had been admittedly “patently clear” as evidenced by said

Judges’ removal. Again, the record showed idiotic record Government corruption. See

attached STATE Court docket, Case # 2006-CA-003185, BUSSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA,

Lee Count Circuit Court.

JUDICIAL OFFICERS’ FRAUD ON THE COURTS UNDER FALSE PRETENSES

18. Here, Honeywell, and the other Defendants & Officials fraudulently kept the Plaintiffs away

from Court for the criminal purposes of obstructing justice and covering up for the fellow

crooked Government Defendants and Officials, who had, e.g., concocted a fake “resolution”,

fake “land” parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-000001.0000” on the

public record.

7
 CORRUPTION WAS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF ANY JUDICIAL IMMUNITY

19. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that the Rules and public policy prohibited the judicial corruption,

fraud on the Courts, bribery, and extortion on the record, which the Plaintiff whistleblowers

had conclusively evidenced in multiple State and Federal lawsuits since 2006. Said record

judicial corruption, bribery, fraud, and extortion were outside the scope of any judicial

“immunity”. Just like vexatious and vile Nazi Officials, here the judicial Defendants pulled the

wool over the people’s eyes:

“Judicial immunity provides judges with blanket immunity …”

Here, Def. Honeywell knew that said Defendants, Officials, and Attorneys provided the

American people with a “blanket” of prima facie judicial horseshit for the criminal purposes of

concealment and cover-up.

RECORD FRAUD EVIDENCE AND DIRECT ATTACK ON JUDGMENT(S)/ORDER(S)

20. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that it was a hackneyed truism that res judicata does not preclude

a litigant from making a direct attack upon the judgment before the court which renders it. A

party may of course introduce fraud evidence

“with the direct and primary objective of modifying, setting aside, canceling,

vacating, or enjoining the enforcement of the judgment.”

See C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure at § 4406. Here, the fake

“resolution” and “land parcels” were such prima facie fraud evidence on the public record,

and the Defendant judicial crooks knew and fraudulently concealed that said fake “land

parcels” had never been platted, conveyed, and/or legally described in reference to the 1912

“Cayo Costa” Subdivision Plat in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25.

8
21. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that the Plaintiffs were of course entitled to directly attack the

prima facie fraudulent orders and judgments, because as a matter of law, involuntary

alienation of private property was never a “legislative” function. See also separation-of-

powers Doctrine. Just like the Katrina and Gulf oil spill disasters proved, U.S. Government

screws up all the time as it did over and over in these Cases since 2006.

22. Just like the fake “weapons of mass destruction” never existed, here U.S. Government

Defendants also employed “weapons of mass deception” such as, e.g., a fake “resolution”, fake

“land parcels”, fake “frivolity”, and fake “vexatiousness”. Defendants’ and Judges’ prima facie

idiocy on the record was again embarrassing and for the whole world to see.

IDIOTIC & INCOMPREHENSIBLE “CLAIM” AND/OR “DEFENSE” “O.R. 569/875”

23. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that Plaintiffs’ lawsuits in State and Federal Courts since 2006

had conclusively proven, e.g., fraud, fraud on the Courts, corruption, extortion, and deliberate

deprivations under color of, e.g., sham “claim” and/or “defense” “O.R. 569/875”, which the

law did not recognize. Here, Defendants’ sham “defense” and/or “claim” of a “resolution”

(non-existent “O.R. 569/875”) were facially idiotic and incomprehensible. As a matter of law,

no “lawmaker” could have possibly divested the Plaintiffs of their property against Plaintiffs’

will. Any valid condemnation and/or involuntary alienation would have exclusively been a

judicial function. Here, no judicial proceedings and/or involuntary alienation ever took place

as conclusively evidenced by the record. Here, the Plaintiffs defended their record

unimpeachable property ownership and title against fraud, corruption, bribery, and extortion.

Here, the Defendants and Officials knew and fraudulently concealed that there were no

‘ripeness requirements’. Here, the Plaintiffs were of course entitled to plead prima facie fraud,

corruption, extortion, and bribery in Federal Courts.

9
 DEFENDANTS FAILED TO DEFEND AGAINST NULL & VOID HOAX “O.R. 569/875”

24. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that the Defendant Officials failed to defend against said proof

and allegations on the record. In particular, said Officials and Judges failed to defend against

the idiotic pretenses of involuntary alienation by fraudulently pretended “virtue of” prima

facie scam and hoax “O.R. 569/875”.

PLAINTIFFS SUED CORRUPT U.S. OFFICIALS IN THEIR PRIVATE CAPACITIES

25. Here, Defendant Honeywell knew that because the record corruption, bribery, fraud, and

extortion by the Defendant U.S. Judges and Officials were outside the scope of any lawful

judicial and/or governmental activity, the Plaintiffs expressly sued the Defendant corrupt

Judges in their individual private capacities.

26. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that public policy demanded criminal investigation and

prosecution of the Defendant crooked U.S. Judges for their crimes on the public record.

27. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that U.S. Officials refused to investigate and prosecute the

Defendant corrupt Judges and Officials for the criminal purposes of concealing said record

crimes. Here, public policy had absolutely required equal prosecution. Here, judges were no

different from any other citizen.

EMERGENCY OF PRIMA FACIE FRAUDULENT MOTION, “DOC. # 29, 06/30/10”

28. In “Document 29, 06/30/10”, purportedly the “United States of America”, “by and through its

Defendant undersigned attorneys”, and including Defendant crooked Attorney Matthew Fesak,

fraudulently pretended that Plaintiffs’ proof and allegations of, e.g., corruption, extortion,

bribery, and fraud were “barred by absolute immunity”, Doc. # 29, p. 1.

DEFENDANTS’ FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF OFFICIAL CAPACITY SUIT

10
29. Here, Defendant presiding Government Crook Honeywell knew that the Plaintiffs had

expressly sued the Defendants and Officials in their private individual capacities. See Doc. # 1.

However falsely and shamelessly, the Defendant crooked Judges, Officials, and Attorneys

pretended:

“Insofar as this is an official capacity suit properly brought against the United States
and not the individual federal officers …” See Doc. # 29, p. 5, fn 2.

DEFENDANTS’ FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF res judicata

30. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that unintelligently, Defendant M. Fesak, on behalf of the crooked

Officials, rambled about “res judicata”, Doc. # 29, p. 3:

“… Plaintiffs utter contempt of this Court’s authority, principles of res judicata, and
the rule of law;”

Here, the rule of law prohibited Defendants’ and Officials’ fraud, fraud on the Courts,

corruption, and deliberate deprivations under color of sham “land” and “parcel” “claims”. See

Chapters 73, 74, 95, 712, Florida Statutes.

DEFENDANTS’ ABSURD & IDIOTIC “IMMUNITY” “CLAIMS / DEFENSES”

31. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that said prima facie false pretenses were absurd as easily

illustrated and explained by the fact that judges were and are of course not “immune” from,

e.g., murder or other crimes outside the judicial scope.

U.S. “FRIVOLITY” & “VEXATIOUSNESS” SCAMS AND COVER-UP

32. Just like, e.g., Nazi Judges in Nazi Germany were not “immune” from prosecution, the

Defendant Nazi-style Officials in these Government corruption Cases had to defend against

their crimes on the public record. Cover-up was not any option. Idiotically blurting out

“frivolity” and “vexatiousness” was not any option under the rule of law.

11
 THE PLAINTIFFS WERE ABSOLUTELY ENTITLED TO RELIEF

33. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that, of course, the Plaintiffs were entitled to, e.g., equitable relief.

Here, said Defendants’ ignorance and arrogance were injurious. Here, the Plaintiffs were

entitled to defend against Government extortion and fraud scheme “O.R. 569/875”.

DEFENDANTS EXTORTED UNDER COLOR OF FACIALLY FAKE “O.R. 569/875”

34. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that said Defendants extorted and conspired to extort property and

fees under fraudulent pretenses and color of authority, office, and/or fake “resolution” “O.R.

569/875”.

DEFENDANTS IDIOTICALLY CONCOCTED “LAW” [“O.R. 569/875”]

35. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that Defendants’ prima facie unrecognized concoction and/or

“defense” of legislative “condemnation” [“O.R. 569/875”] was an idiotic crime. Here, no fit

and intelligent judge could have possibly concocted such judicial trash, because any and all

involuntary alienation of property would have been exclusively a judicial function. Here, no

court judgment/order had ever existed, and no “law” was ever adopted by anyone.

NO “immunity” FROM GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION & EXTORTION

36. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that EXTORTION has been defined as

"the obtaining of property from another induced by wrongful use of actual or

threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right."

See Black's Law Dictionary.

"the unlawful exaction of money or property through intimidation."

See Encyclopedia Britannica.

37. Here, Def. Honeywell knew that Defendants and Defendant Government Officials conspired to

fraudulently interact, defraud, deliberately deprive, bribe Officials, and extort property and

fees from the Plaintiffs under color of, e.g., authority, office, and official right. Here, no

12
 Government ever had any official right or authority to “claim” any “lands”. Here, Defendant

Officials and Judges fraudulently concealed the prima facie criminality and nullity of said

Government scam “O.R. 569/875”.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs again demand

1. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Judicial Officer and Defendant crooked Judge C. E.

Honeywell from conspiring to conceal and concealing said public record & corruption

evidence and said “PUBLISHED PUBLIC NOTICES” for prima facie criminal purposes

outside the scope of any judicial “immunity”, “Documents ## 220, 221, 223, 225, 226, 229,

230, 232, 233, 234, 235”, 2:2009-cv-00791;

2. An EMERGENCY Order removing Judicial Officer and Defendant crooked Judge C. E.

Honeywell from these farce proceedings, because Honeywell deceived the Court and

conspired with other Defendants to keep the Plaintiffs away from Court and defraud them

under color of scam “O.R. 569/875” and facially forged “land parcels”;

3. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Judicial Officer and Defendant crooked Judge C. E.

Honeywell, because Honeywell obstructed justice and concealed said record fake “land

parcels” as conclusively proven by said Plat in Lee County PB 3, Page 25 (1912);

4. An EMERGENCY Order removing Judicial Officer and Defendant Attorney Matthew L.

Fesak from these proceedings, because he deceived the Court and conspired with other

Defendants to keep the Plaintiffs away from Court and defraud them under color of scam

“O.R. 569/875” and facially forged “land parcels”;

5. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and

other Officials from perpetuating the perpetration of fraud on the Courts since 2006;

13
6. An EMERGENCY Order vacating the facially fraudulent orders and judgments in any and

all Cases of record since 2006;

7. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and

other Officials from perpetrating fraud on the Courts under fraudulent pretenses of purportedly

“unripe” claims, because the Plaintiffs rightfully pleaded fraud, corruption, extortion directly

in Federal Court and defended their record ownership against Defendants’ facially frivolous

and fraudulent “claims” and “defenses”;

8. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and

other Officials on the record from fraudulently pretending “res judicata” and “immunity”,

because corruption, bribery, fraud, and extortion under facially false pretenses of scandalous

scam “O.R. 569/875” were outside any Government and/or judicial scope of lawful activity

and did not preclude Plaintiffs’ direct attack on the facially fraudulent orders and judgment by

Defendant crooked Officials;

9. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining the Defendants and Officials from further concealing

the non-existence of fabricated “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-

00001.0000”, which could not be found on said 1912 Plat in Plat Book 3, Page 25;

10. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and

other Officials on the record from fraudulently pretending “res judicata” and “immunity”,

because corruption, bribery, fraud, and extortion under facially false pretenses of scandalous

scam “O.R. 569/875” were outside any Government and/or judicial scope of lawful activity;

11. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and

other Officials on the record from the absurd pretenses of “immunity”, because of course the

14
 corruption and Government crimes on the record demanded equal prosecution and

investigation of the Defendant Officials and Judges under the Rules and public policy;

12. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and

other Officials from corruptly concocting “frivolity” and “vexatiousness” for criminal purposes

of extending prima facie fraud and extortion scheme “O.R. 569/875” and concealing the

criminality and nullity of said scam and scandal;

13. An EMERGENCY Order for the removal of prima facie scam “O.R. 569/875” from the

public record;

14. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant corrupt presiding Judge Charlene E.

Honeywell from concealing Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable record ownership of Lot 15A, Parcel #

12-44-20-01-00015.015A, as affirmed and conclusively proven by the public record;

15. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant corrupt presiding Judge Charlene E.

Honeywell from maliciously perverting the dispositive affirmation of Plaintiffs’ record

ownership by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Prescott, et al., v. State of

Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009);

38. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant crooked presiding Judge Honeywell, because

she disrespected the law, disrupted the proceedings in favor of the Defendants, perverted the

facts of record, and could not possibly be trusted to be impartial and fair, 28 U.S.C. § 455; 18

U.S.C. §§ 241, 242 (see Doc. # 213, 2:2009-cv-00791).

__________________________________
/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT
Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff, pro se
P.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295
_______________________________________
/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.
Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff, pro se, JRBU@aol.com
State Cert. Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor;

15
Defendant Crooked Officials’ Real Estate Fraud Scheme

• Fake “lot” and “block” numbers such as, e.g.:

o “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;
o “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;
Neither fake “lot” “00A0” nor “block”
“00001”ever existed.
• Fake “Government ownership” claims;
• Fake “transaction(s)” such as, e.g., “O.R. 569/875”;
• Fake “resolution” and “law” “claims”;
• Fake “land” “parcels”;
• Fake “frivolity” “defenses”;
• Fake “vexatiousness” contentions;
• Fake “legal descriptions”:

16
17
18
“DESCRIPTION”
OF HORSESHIT:
Crooked Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell

http://www.scribd.com/Judicial%20Fraud
 STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

Public records confirm that Busse owns a lot in a platted subdivision located

in Lee County. This lot (50' x 130') abuts a platted 60 foot wide street. At some point

westward of the street is the Gulf of Mexico Since the subdivision was platted in

1912, considerable accretion has occurred on land bordering the Gulf of Mexico

westward of Busse’s lot. Appellant claims riparian rights. Lee County has claimed

said accreted lands for public park purposes.

4
 CASE NO. 08-13170-B
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
ATLANTA, GEORGIA

JORG BUSSE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; BOARD OF LEE

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; LEE COUNTY
PROPERTY APPRAISER; STATE OF FLORIDA
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL
IMPROVEMENT FUND, STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION,

Defendants-Appellees.
__________________________________/
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT COURT OF FLORIDA, FORT MYERS DIVISION
_________________________________________________________________
ANSWER BRIEF OF DEFENDANT-APPELLEE,
LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA and BOARD of LEE
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

DAVID M. OWEN
LEE COUNTY ATTORNEY
2115 Second Street
Post Office Box 398
Fort Myers, Florida 33902
(239) 533-2236
(239) 485-2118 FAX

JACK N. PETERSON
Assistant County Attorney
 Crooked Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell

JUDICIAL TRASH
DOC. # 213
2:09-cv-00791-CEH-SPC
Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009):

“I. BACKGROUND
A. Current Action
The Appellants are owners of Lot 15A in the Cayo Costa subdivision
in Lee County, Florida. On May 5, 2008, the Appellants filed the present
pro se complaint against numerous state and county officials n1 alleging
that they had violated the Appellants' constitutional rights with respect to
their Cayo Costa property. Most of the allegations in the complaint
concern the 1969 Lee County Resolution 569/875, which claimed the
undesignated areas on the east and west side of the Cayo Costa
subdivision plat and all accretions thereto as public land to be used for
public purposes. The Appellants' Lot 15A is on the west side of the
Cayo Costa subdivision on the Gulf of Mexico and is adjacent to
land that was claimed through Resolution 569/875 to create the
Cayo Costa State Park.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Footnotes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1
The complaint named the following defendants (herein collectively "the Appellees"): (1) the State of
Florida Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund; (2) the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, Division of Recreation and Parks; (3) Lee County, Florida; (4) the Board of
Lee County Commissioners; (5) Jack N. Peterson, Lee County Attorneys [*3] Jack Peterson, Donna
Marie Collins, and David Owen; (6) Lee County property appraisers Kenneth M. Wilkinson and Sherri L.
Johnson; and (7) Cayo Costa State Park employees Reginald Norman, Harold Vielhauerin, Linda
Funchess, Reagan Russell, and Tom Beason.

http://www.scribd.com/Judicial%20Fraud
Crooked Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell

http://www.scribd.com/Judicial%20Fraud
 Crooked Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell
JUDICIAL TRASH
DOC. # 213, PAGE 5
CORRUPT BUNGLING JUDGE
CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL

“I. BACKGROUND 4
Plaintiffs allege that they are the owners of Lot 15A in the Cayo Costa
Subdivision of Lee County, Florida (Dkt. 1, ¶1; Dkt. 5, ¶1). In a resolution
adopted in December 1969 by the Board of Commissioners of Lee County,
Florida, Lot 15A, among other property, was claimed as public land (“Resolution
569/875") (Dkt 5, Ex. 3, p. 9). See Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343
Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009); Busse, et al. v. Lee County,
Florida, et al., 317 Fed. Appx. 968, 970 (11th Cir. Mar 5, 2009).”

http://www.scribd.com/Judicial%20Fraud