Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • A Simplified Precision Formula For The Inductance of A Helix With Corrections For The Lead-In Wires

    Hochgeladen von

    esi1365
    35 Ansichten8 Seiten
    A simplified precision formula for the inductance of a helix with corrections for the lead-in wires

    Originaltitel

    A simplified precision formula for the inductance of a helix with corrections for the lead-in wires

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Verfügbare Formate

    PDF oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    A simplified precision formula for the inductance of a helix with corrections for the lead-in wires

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als PDF herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    35 Ansichten8 Seiten

    A Simplified Precision Formula For The Inductance of A Helix With Corrections For The Lead-In Wires

    Hochgeladen von

    esi1365
    A simplified precision formula for the inductance of a helix with corrections for the lead-in wires

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als PDF herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 8
    RP479 A SIMPLIFIED PRECISION FORMULA FOR THE INDUC- TANCE OF A HELIX WITH CORRECTIONS FOR THE LEAD-IN WIRES By Chester Snow [ABSTRACT ‘A precision formula is here given for the self inductance of a single-layer helix wound with ordinary round wire. This is neither more nor less accurate than That previously published, from which it has been derived by evaluating certain Correction terms and replacing them by approximation formulas which are much simpler to compute. CONTENTS Page I, Introduction. 419 II. Tranfsormation of By(k) 420 IT, Transformation of By(k) 423 IV. Corrections due to lead. 424 I, INTRODUCTION ‘The formula derived in this paper is a modification, without loss of precision, of the expression for the inductance of a single-layer helix of round wire, given in Bureau of Standards Scientific Paper No. 537 (vol. 21, p. 431, 1926-27). The notation hes been changed, and the correction terms transformed so that the present formula is more simple from the point of view of the computer. ‘The diameter of the wire is d; the mean diameter of the solenoid is D; and its length J is the axial distance from the center of the wire at the begininng of the first turn to the center of the wire at the end of the N® turn, N’ being the total turns so that the pitch of the winding is UN. The modulus & of the complete ellipitic integrals K and E is given by D PanrD ‘The principal term L, is the current-sheet formula of Lorenz. oe Lk ee [x E+E EB | a) As one of the correction terms there appears M, the mutual inductance between the two end-circles of the solenoid, which is computed by ‘K-E_k m=4e0[ -tx] @ The inductance L of an actual helix is (to a precision which neglects terms of the order of (xp) ex as 420 Bureaw of Standards Journal of Research [Velo L=L,+ =[2N(n ee 0.g0473)+ Ln Ms? +1P(5) -im 2 yr en [2+(4")'] @) “Hsbc gol where P(q) = gp Bind when 11 =8y—alng when 751 @) ‘The ambiguous sign is plus for the “natural” and minus for the uni- form distribution of current over the section of the wires. A current: density inversel roportional to the distance from the axis of the solenoid is called the natural distribution, ‘The formula for L here given is obtained by change of notation and by transformation of the function A, (F) in formula (114) of the paper cited. (This formula contains a misprint in the term log which should be log 5)- In the present notation this formula is L-L+ +D[2n(in yfq-0-soata))+ $n G2 a + +eDA) = 2 FFD (AB) ‘The function As(k) is defined by formula (89) As(l) = SBo(b)— By(b) + Ba] +0.66267— lo ‘The numerical quantity B, was defined in (90) as @ series which haa’ been found to be —0.60835. Hence =Dax)= Tf Se) 2,0) +0. ®) ‘The term 0.11 in the parenthesis will be omitted since 0.1 D will be, considered negligil le in small correction term. As most sole- noids to be us as precision standards would have an inductance greater than 10 millihenries (107 cm), it is evident that with a diameter of say 30 cm, 0.1 ‘D would be 3 em, which is about 3 parts in 10,000,000, Hence, in the transformations of By(k) and By(k) which follow, terms of the order of 0.1 may be considered negligible. Il, TRANSFORMATION OF 2,(k) On page 507 of the paper quoted, By is given by T—k? (1 K(x)dz \ yg) =1 2 AEE *f es @ (ay ‘Snow Precision Formula for Inductance of Helix 421 If we let. TEE ond Pep and E IF 4! _K()de “f ay K( 1 ) tJ), Vie Jo VIFR VIF, 4 (Ea (3 4 (Frog | atv F sine ~! fia f rem) veg sind J? then (6) gives Pam -! FD Ew)-4 +() ro) We may evaluate P(y) first for the case where 721; that is, where lzD. ‘Using the formula P(r) ee * 0 dd=—= log 2 (fies sin 9 do —2 log we may write (7) in the form * PO) 20g 244 "log (9+ var Fa do =2log ant$ ftoe(a + yi +58) aa or since (for n=1) ane creee log (1+ 4/1+58 leg 2-37 P(n)=2 log ath OT n=2 Since the sum of this alternating series is numerically less than the Value of its first term j52- which is never greater than about ait ® 1, it is sufficient to take P(q)=2 log dng when 21 (ao) When y=1 this becomes 2 log 4+4=3.02 while the oxact expression (9) becomes 2.98. We may, therefore, take P(1)=3. On the other hand, when 05951, the approximation P (9)=3n+9 log 2 when 05951 (10) 1829193210 422 Bureau of Standards Journal of Research vas will be in error by not more than 0.1. ‘This may be seen from the fact ar 10)’ js correct at 7=0 and 1=1, while the error between 0 ond 1 is Y(=snta log 3 PO) which bas its greatest numerical value when = LF o.ss008 corresponding to i? =0,8014. This is the root of the equation a 1 Ke 4k ¥'(q)e0=2+log 5-P'(n)=24+5 log ppm Kw To estimate this greatest error, we may obtain an upper and lower limit to P (9) as follows: Write P()=log arf! log (+ 1+ a= cost6)'d0 log aril” log (1421? cost0-+2n VIF? cos) do Now Qn T+ = c0s"6 = Any 1 + 1 cos’@—Z (n, 6) where 1 wee S74) 5, 29=E > Nery Hosa or where 1 eo ‘The function Z is never negative. It vanishes when 0=5 and has its greatest value when 0=0 and 6== which is Hence P(n) may be written in the form Pom} flog a VIF P+ n-Zee, O- oe) ost] do If in this integral we replace the variable function Z(n, 8) b smallest value, zero, we got a function F(@), which is an upper for P(q) for all values of 1. Fen} [toe alcytres ay (AGES) cotolao sane} Precision Formula for Inductance of Heliz 423 If we replace Z(7,6) by its greatest value, we get a function f(q) which is a lower limit to P(q) for all values of (a) where : 5a) /fTFaF Feet [tog 4 TRH +m MOE EES _ (ALERT costae That is f(0) 0. Both of these functions may be evaluated by means of the definite integral formula ifr log 4 (a'—Be0s'#) dé=2 log (a+ YaF=0') if azb which gives 7) F(q)=2 log (yI+9? +n) (ty I)=2 tog (20 a)1+4r+ 7h) F(0)=0, F(1)=2.984 (0) =0, FL) =2.958 At the point of maximum error in the range 0

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen