Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
companys
market share. Business markets are different from consumer markets. Business
Markets have
very little, whereas consumer markets have mass of buyers, general product design
is more
saleable, relatively smaller transactions, brand image matters a lot and the price is
a major
determinant of sales. Hence the thumb rules of consumer market loyalty cannot be
applied for the
about the value they deliver rather than using conventional segmentation and
targeting approach
of the consumer market. Firms in business markets must employ the approaches
that are based on
In order to communicate the benefits effectively first one should understand the
nature of benefits
involved in the particular product line for the business markets, the various
managerial
departments of the buyers and their interest areas. Along with this one must also
understand the
levels of business loyalty and the various types of consumers in order to estimate
the existing
level of business loyalty among the customers and to target various befits to
various types of
customers. Keeping these needs in mind the current assignment was undertaken.
communication strategies for building the loyalty in business markets. This work
also focuses on
benefits. This assignment further aims at explaining the wrong presumptions in the
business
Benefits Typology
Most sellers assume that buyers know the value of offered products and services,
whereas most of
business customers dont keep track of all the products and services they get and
that they cannot
quantify the value of many benefits. In fact many buyers do not use some services
that suppliers
regularly provide, and they stop using others if suppliers charge for them. Hence it
becomes
first we must understand the typology of benefits based on their tangibility and the
financial or
non-financial nature.
First category of benefits is tangible financial benefits. This includes benefits like
energy use
efficiency of the machines, low cost of maintenance etc. These benefits can be
easily
communicated by the sellers and buyers can also verify them. There is no need to
communicate
much about such benefits, whereas Non-tangible financial benefits are an effective
way of
though sellers can communicate these benefits very easily. Benefits like additional
gross profit
this second category of benefits include using research report from independent
external
conducting comparative study using products and services from other providers etc.
Third category of benefits is Tangible nonfinancial benefits. These include benefits
which are
difficult for sellers to quantify, even though buyers recognize it. These include
benefits such as
associated with these benefits is that it requires time and capital investment for its
creation.
which are difficult for the seller to convey and also difficult for the buyers to
physically
experience and quantify. This category includes benefits like extraordinary non-
formal services
provided by the sellers which are not mandatory. Even though these benefits are
difficult to
convey over and to experience, these are most critical ones in determining the
customer business
products. They can build relationships by shifting customers focus from tangible
benefits to
in the breakeven point of the machine, its resource use efficiency etc. and top level
executive is
interested in, what addition impact the installation will make on the profit and
growth rate. Hence
it becomes necessary to identify the nature of managerial function and direct the
communication
of benefits to the particular management personnel. This is what the author calls as
Linking
Benefits to Decision Makers. To link the Befits to the appropriate decision makers
author has
developed The Benefit Stack and the Decision-Maker Stack model. In this model on
one side the
specific benefits of the product/service from a given seller are listed and are
matched with the
benefits. By linking the two stacks, the vendor can systematically tackle each
decision makers
concerns and communicate how it will meet his or her specific needs.
Levels of Loyalty
customers and grow their loyalty over a period of time in order to retain the
customer base. Many
same customer over time. Both of these are not the comprehensive measures of the
loyalty of the
from loyalty with the costs of managing customers. This comparative measurement
of rewards
from loyalty with the costs of managing customers is necessary in order to decide
how much time
and money they should expend on customer relationships. This can be done by
using the tool,
what author calls it as The Loyalty Ladder. The ladder is based on hierarchical
pattern of
willingness to buy more products or services at this stage and expand the scope of
its relationship
with the vendor. In the next higher stage of loyalty ladder, customer speaks
positively about the
vendors product and endorses the vendor company openly. In the third higher level
of loyalty
ladder, the buyer customer resists vendors competitors blandishments and the
customer is less
likely to switch to the product of other company even if competitor is providing the
product of superior quality or at lower prices in the expectation that the existing
supplier will provide higher
quality product in the future. In the next higher level of loyalty ladder customer is
willing to even
pay premium price to the preferred supplier. The customer believes that the
feedback it provides
will foster future improvements and wants to help the supplier develop new
products and
services. In the higher most level of vendor customer is even willing to invest in the
suppliers
production activities in order to help supplier develop new products and services.
As the customer loyalty increases exit barriers are reduced, investments reduce
vendors risks,
Types of Customers
advantages of having that buyer remain on its current rung of the loyalty ladder
with the cost of
moving it up and the savings from moving it down. That calculation yields four
customer
category of customers operates in industries with high fixed costs and includes
showcase
accounts that companies use to enhance their reputations. Next category of the
customers is the
Partners. Such customers are expensive to serve, but the returns usually justify the
effort, they
want turnkey solutions from suppliers and choose not to develop in-house expertise
or make
investments that would reduce their need for vendors services. They view suppliers
as valueadding partners and look for long-term commitments. These customers also
want the latest and
best products and are willing to pay premiums for them. Last category of customers
is Most
Valuable Customers. They are as loyal as partners but often less expensive to serve.
Loophole in argument:
Author argues that there is very little correlation between satisfaction scores and
customer loyalty
in business markets. Even though statistical analysis shows such results the author
probably
ignores the possibility that the effect of satisfaction may be masked by other factors
like change
highly influenced by the amount of satisfaction drawn from the product. Of course
the business
buyer who is not dissatisfied with service will not go for the product from that seller.
Probably author has failed to capture the various dimensions of the satisfaction.
Author need to
review the measures of satisfaction and if possible cross validate the obtained
measures of
Conclusion: In order to turn the commodity buyers into most valuable customers
suppliers must
extra revenues are earned and creating awareness among customers about
additional services and
benefits.