Linguistic diversity is an essential segment in the uniqueness
of communitys identity, which stimulate and support new
ways of thinking, exchange, creativity and innovation. It does to only apply to how different words are spoken in different languages as when English 'dog' shows up in Spanish as perro or in Japanese as inu , but language diversity comes into play with different pronunciation, vocabulary and grammar which stimulates from different cultural background. India is a wholly diversified multilingual country with 22 languages being officially recognised. English and Hindi are the two most common languages used by the central government, given no one language as the official status of national language of India. The composition of the workforce has grown increasingly more diverse ethnically and with that language diversity has become an unavoidable concept. Thereby impeding safety, efficiency, harmony, productivity, and possibly alienate a customer base. Certain employers as a result believe there is a need to adopt English-only policies to combat what they feel is too much diversity in language at the workplace. Moreover, the more culturally diverse the country and the workforce become, the more important, it is often asserted, will it be to have a common language. As such, certain employers have adopted restrictive language policies prohibiting their workers from speaking Tamil, Kannad, Marathi, Punjabi as well as other languages other than English and Hindi. Employers contend these policies are necessary because speaking a language not understood by customers or fellow employees is inefficient and unproductive as well as perceived as rude and insensitive. Safety concerns are another often-cited reason for English- only rules, for example, in a hospital emergency room or operating room setting, in an oil refinery or on an oil rig, or on a production line, where clear, quick, and understandable communication is critical. It is equally difficult to manage someone with whom one cannot communicate due to language barrier. For example some poor performing employees use the language barrier to their advantage to avoid having to change their behaviour. Rather than being a true barrier, the employee tries to manipulate the manager by claiming a failure to communicate
Most Indians that you will do business with speak English at a
high level. However understanding the linguistic talents of Indians will give you a lot more respect for their abilities and make you less likely to correct any inconsequential errors you notice. A persons mother-tongue is a very special and intimate part of their being. If one is careful enough to respect the linguistic differences, it will build a lot of relational capital. It is important to recognize that when you work with a group of Indians, you should insist on people using a language that is universally known and most comfortable. For example, if you are in Chennai with a group of familiars and a few northerners mixed in, you should insist on the team using English and not Tamil for the sake of those who will feel uncomfortable and left out. In such situation one group tends to dominate the other, reducing the input of other socially exclusive group, as a result, discrimination can occur based on the language a person speaks. Socialization processes too, such as building of trust and relationships among team members, are language dependent.
Employers, therefore, must be careful that they do not get
caught in a legal and ethical language squeeze between conflicting stakeholder demands, in particular the rights of people who only speak their native language in the workplace and the rights of other people who do not speak native language or whose primary language is not the native one. The rapidly changing demographics of the population and the workforce brought about by high levels of immigration, combined with the needs of employers to conduct their businesses in a diverse and global environment, will force many employers to confront the highly contentious and challenging legal, ethical, and practical issue of language in the workplace, particularly concerning English only and English fluency rules. In light of this backdrop of increasing diversity in workforce, a business manager may then ponder how to avoid running afoul of language discrimination lawsuits. Thus the English-only rule is becoming a common feature of workplace culture, employment and management as employers increasingly aggressive recruitment of bilingual employees.