Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
In
short you know, beyond the answer that you give according to the social and cultural
group around you; Victorian or conservative, freer and more democratic. If you choose
to hide or have the ability to respect your dignity and act accordingly, or choose what
best suits as required by your family, your religion, social group or is convenient, not
marry who you love or do not want. Being happy or someone disguised as a slave of
others.
"All of which is only one edge of this interesting and complex issue, full of prejudices
product of cultural and historical factors and important in the lives of individuals, and
characterized the brand as such, that can make them happy, full , healthy and full of
upheaval, repression, trauma and frustration that can lead to other more serious,
including psychopathology, which hamper a good quality of life of the person and those
around you.
"True, it can be difficult, as many aspects of life, must have clear values and be
courageous in them, self-worth and clarity towards higher goals provide security in the
act and through a prudent and intelligent based on respect and love any goal can be
achieved despite the adverse environment there, "people can change and can transform
your negative thoughts and actions into positive -
Otherwise, as stated by the experience of others I've known, is supported for some
years, until nature, consciousness and internal health erupt, with most problems and
once the youth has already left.
While I think that even so, always acting honestly and in good faith gives more and
better mental health outcomes. "Fear is an emotional factor, and as anger, undermines
the thought.The value in values gives meaning to everything, without them all
worthless. So money becomes empty when you live in or obtained through
misrepresentation that. The internal peace, honest relationship that respects itself and
the other is what gives the true, stable and transcendent joy. She in the mirror knows no
masks, lies and deception, when available, especially on this issue, it exists, is apparent.
When there is that clarity and honesty with oneself and others, he is able to withstand
all-making it clear that he rejects is an intellectual situation, values, psychological and
sociocultural low, which is expressed in that attitude, and act as we think -, which did
not happen in the earring, the socio-cultural elite, that is the best, the smartest, the most
good, better educated, wiser. In this intellectual elite, sociocultural and appreciate all
that is written here does not have much sense, this is not new and are subjects by birth
or reflection that are outdated.
I leave aside the money, because although they have had greater access to academic
groups, intellectual and artistic, not always so, thereby excluding the economic of the
concepts of virtue, elite social, cultural or intellectual any connotation of greatness.
Vgr., Known criminals, drug dealers, murderers, psychopaths, gangsters, dictators, both
left and right, terrorists, etc.., Have had large sums of money, although such persons for
their antisocial act, lack of empathy and inhumanity away from concepts related to the
great, as beauty and virtue, always positive concepts of excellence and if the bonis own
homes, large (Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Alexander the Great, Saladin, Jesus Christ,
beyond looking son of God or God is out of this discussion, I think anyone in such a
philosophical level is a Son of God, Muhammad, Buddha, Balmaceda, J. Carter,
Kennedy, and others).
It is therefore never history, academics, intellectuals have regarded them in that line,
without prejudice to be remembered as murderers, war and evil men, that pressure
groups have joined social camouflage as it is difficult to deny access , and yet never be
part of these.
- Sexuality is part of our essence as a person and living healthy is good for our mind and
body. Question backed by science, only to see the opinion of any expert in the matter,
Kinsey, Freud, in his prime, or European sexologists as Willy and current Coslada and
Michel Foucault, Dr. Pino, etc. are all fair, without intervention sectarian one-and
confirmed by the practice and logic ... it is obvious happiness and health that displays a
person with real active sexuality and what you wish for: his humor, his pink skin color,
their behavior is more relaxed, less tense, it is more gentle, and so on. ... more
happy."This clearly understood in the free and spontaneous sex, outside services such as
force or abuse, and without falling into the paraphilias (eg pedophilia, gerontofilia,
necrophilia, bestiality, etc).
... In addition and as data related to this note, we know that most people do not think, is
led by the form and not the substance of things, why society is so manipulated by
politicians and advertising ... 80% of people do not understand what he is told, and
rather assumed based on the manner in which he expresses the theme, it has been well
exploited by politicians and religions, reaching extremes of consequences that the
history knows, "Verdi Gracia, millions killed by the Nazis, on the basis of race, and
there is a theory about the superiority of one over other, or deaths in the holy
inquisition. Abominations unfortunately until today still happening, although G. Mr in
less extent, as awareness of human rights increasingly takes more strength.
This intellectual illiteracy, sexuality is expressed at the negative position of the same
product of historical factors (Adam and Eve, "sex is bad," "pig", "evil" unless it is for
procreation, so you must have fault for pleasure), political and economic interests of the
state in managing the behavior of people (eg in nineteenth century, ensuring the
existence of population or labor force necessary for wealth), and before that the
Victorian vision, hypocritical (Foucault), in reverse of the naturalness, s.XVII,
accentuating the negative connotation of sex, silence, secrecy, and public disapproval,
sex only for reproduction, then all expressed in the nineteenth century in the holy law,
the only lead of the lives, providing the will of the ruler , the king or multiple groups
"democratic", it follows the same classic despotic monarchical prescribing patterns,
banning, censoring or declaring lawful or unlawful through the rule-sex-legal power,
depriving or limiting the pleasures and freedom, especially for maintain power or
control, without any objective basis, logical, scientific or transcendental value, only
trials in consideration of the wishes of some, driving the ignorance of many, not
knowing the sex, and without prejudice to the famous and empty phrases such as
morality and decency, concepts overcome by the consciousness-based ethics, science
and transcendental values, human rights, which in a modern and developed democratic
state socioculturally direct the people act.
But something different is the right to life, which is also a fundamental right that flows
from human nature and life with dignity. "We should note at this position (sex /
reproduction), which in countries that have accepted full freedoms, socially and
culturally developed countries, children are still born and existing families, who live in
greater peace and dignity of life .Humans are procreating and his death is closer for
other reasons for their cause, as are the unfortunate deaths or illnesses directly caused
by war and pollution.
"Yet the sex negative thesis, came to the exacerbation of interest in sex in a insane
(monetization of the same sex private pleasure in hidden places, guilt, cynicism and
hypocrisy, institutionalized, sexual dysfunction, impotence, frigidity, premature Early,
etc., as well as frustration, unhappiness, reaching psychopathology, etc.). and creates the
need for expression or literal told the same dark, secret (egwritings of the Marquis de
Sade, or the anonymous author of "My Secret Life ', or the confession to the priest, the
concern for the lives of others as sexual scandal) vision has transcended to today to a
lesser extent, depending on the level socio-cultural or group to analyze trends, people
from mental rigidity and ingrained prejudices, people who prefer to focus on the
protection of state interests, as if we serve the same, or other more respectful of people
and their freedom to develop in all facets of his life, being the standard to serve people.
"Clearly, the moral premise that orders under their sexuality as a means of procreation,
as well as being illusory, is attempted threat to the basic principles of democracy and
human rights.
"For the good, the product of cultural development for the highest level of information
through technology (internet) and awareness of the dignity and freedom (Democracy
and Human Rights), we see young people, new generations, taking more lax and
sexuality is no longer big issue with them, again returning to a state and positive
connotation of it, what is appropriate behavior and healthy in every respect,
psychological, physical, social and assessments regarding the speaking truth.
Some time ago based on the "invocation of God, a Muslim country on the basis of
religion, condemned to death by 2 children being caught and accept his homosexuality,
a situation which is why the warnings of the UN. While the position of some Christians
do not reach this end, the basis of discrimination is the same, no reason, which is, I
believe, contrary to the teachings of Jesus Christ-and transcendent of any great
philosophy, which has a message of love and freedom, with its clear limits,
consideration of others. ... Such absurdities have resulted in his thesis on Nietzsche's
revaluation of Christianity (the Antichrist )?...
And we say there's no reason it is proven science is an objective fact that homosexuality
is not a disease, disorder or any, removed from the list of diseases for the WHO for
decades, and is cautious on Human Rights."I think, that we should not be a specialist
(sexologist or psychologist) to reach that conclusion, just enough to glimpse the
complexity of reality and normality of the item and its actual treatment failure (beyond
the position of some who still are internally ) treatment precisely because there is not a
disease, is a reality, a condition that has been said recently by genetic factors is based on
the genes contributed mainly by the father.
Issues for my child, since I read philosophy, and based on human rights and respect for
people are not more important, as extracted from human nature to respect for people
beyond their sexuality (including sexual status), race, religion, political views (as long
as democratic), the type, the existence of physical or mental disabilities, etc. They are
still people and that fact alone they deserve respect, dignity and freedom. "Especially
when there is no harm to another or if the same objective, either physical or
psychological.In this sense it is clear that the rejection or social sanctions are
inappropriate conduct, which as stated are based on prejudice.
"Moreover I think this respect is extended to all living things, being creations of God
and the only existence, as the case of other animals, which are often less harmful than
humans in their midst. Except when necessary, such as food, housing, etc. .-
I am absolutely certain that God, in which I firmly believe, will not discriminate against
its people, to believe that either blacks, whites, gays, lesbians, Muslims, evangelical
Christians, Catholics or Jews, and he and reason emanates gave us respect all human
beings, indeed all living beings."If someone tells me that your God does not believe in
it, and such discrimination in any facet supports, means you have not understood
anything and nothing has been thought, and I can assure that this is not God and not to
worry, because God is good and is on the bases and principles of every great philosophy
and acts of kindness and love that we make as humans, such as fraternity, solidarity,
protection of the weak, respect for others, and so on. Acts by which we will be judged,
if they understand.
- On this point, I think you exegetical interpretations of passages literally created and
written by men in the sacred texts, which make up religions (without prejudice to the
invocation of God is done and the importance of these institutions in support of internal
social peace and international and other laudable goals, "one thing does not remove the
other"), is a real cause for hatred, death, discrimination, suffering, which is alien to God,
"which is good, and I understand thing proven in the course of world history, as true
evil acts and positions that sicken humanity.
In any case justifiable, beyond respect for cultural differences, any mistreatment and
arbitrary distinction based on sexuality, human rights are above any other consideration,
and should be respected and protected by civilized states. Beyond the signing of treaties
or not, they should prevail in the Universal globe. It requires reason, the higher values
and God.
"Well would include constitutional rights within a specific rule prohibiting any
discrimination," although I think it is not necessary, because it is already protected by
art. 1 of our Constitution and in the same direction by the Universal Declaration on
Human Rights. (History of the Constitution, prof. Fco Fulfilled) "And also a mandatory
standard of duty and right to education on sexual psychology on notions of social
intelligence, and institutional foundations and human rights in the global world, it
would bring long term benefits in our society.
"I believe further that the harmony between art. 1 of our constitution and Human Rights
in relation to the principle of equality and dignity that it would eliminate the crime of
sodomy and statutory rape in the figure insert elderly man who has relations with a
minor one, for purposes of the same treatment, the same penalty if men and women, and
in both cases, as now, be sanctioned when there is abuse of power or mental
deficiencies.
- It is stressed that the State is not serving a specific group (Muslim call or Christian) to
meet some absolutism without reason, the democratic state serves all people, steeped in
reason and scientific basis, the state should act in favor of universally recognized human
rights by universal jurisprudence and doctrine (... the best, the wisest), in any event, no
exceptions.
* Following the point where rational sense, scientific, this only demonstrated the
complexity of the topic, in fact Kinsey, Freud (and those who follow him in sexology,
psychology and psychiatry) have shown that sexuality is a subject most difficult to
frame and classify. Paragon Can a person is good or bad for an act?, Still, is it gay a
person who has a homosexual experience in a ship in a boarding school in a prison, in a
depression or a homosexual thought? A gay man becomes a straight by having sex with
a woman?.
In an interview with psychology students, Vicky Chelech among others, the U. Mayor,
responding to this issue:
Straight, gay, bisexual, are concepts that do not exist, according to the complexity of
Freud, as recognized by teachers Grecos, and what I explained in my experience and
I've seen in the other, I think that sexuality is ambivalent, unstable, and that has to do
with multiple factors, either by giving prominence to Eros sex itself, the animal part.
And also to psychological factors, virtue, integrity, interests, charms of another, by
giving prominence to Philia, the love-so-clear what explains Socrates, Xenophon and
others of his time. In addition, other such as loneliness, desire for pleasure, boredom,
depression, external factors that are inhibited v.gr, alcohol, drugs, etc.. As sexual
interest in another person can be found in numerous causes, it is important to recognize
that this is happening and of course, has nothing wrong, except a point made above,
which go hand in hand with the excess.
Thus it is said that the homophobes are people who hide their homosexuality in a rigid
position and specific to avoid falling into this, further aggravated by trauma in their
education or experience sexual violence or repression, which distort their view of
sexuality. "The clear whether hetero, is tolerant and has a position of ease and security
from their sexuality, this is reasonable since it is not anyone should hate another without
an acceptable reason, such as being physically or psychologically abused in objective
terms, the mere presence of another different is not a valid reason, and evokes
something happens internally. Let us add that rates of infidelity and diseases are similar
in men, women, gays and heterosexuals.
Healthy people, free from trauma, it is tolerant. Remember something timely about
double discourse, the fact that over a thousand Catholic priests abuse the children in
Brazil (unfortunately happens all over the world), a book created for the event;clear is
that pedophilia (relationship with children under 14 years) is a perversion, being mostly
heterosexual pedophiles (85% of pedophiles are heterosexual), those enjoying the status
of power over the child.
It is essential that all exposed civilized states and Democrats should accept gay
marriage, since there is no reason to prevent this:
1) In terms of human rights standards and foundations of our constitution, such as
dignity, respect for persons, equality before the law and freedom, gays have the right to
marry and thus can not be prevented by State, who must respect and promote respect for
people. It is a human right of freedom of a person to choose marriage beyond his sexual
orientation and a democratic state respecting the people and serving them, without
discriminating against sex, race and creed, so it should create conditions for their
integral development, both physical, psychological and spiritual.
2) On a behavioral scientist, this proved that the compensation of the children, ie their
free growth, free of defects, especially sexual, is not affected by the sexual orientation
of their parents, "something different to what happens when there are abuses of the core
in any family, whether physical, psychological and sexual abuse, both by action and
neglect, emotional deprivation, abandonment, which can reach to serious psychological
disorders, which affect the life of the person, if there treatment.
As noted above the majority of pedophiles are heterosexual "so we must ban
heterosexual marriages?, Or because most of the children have gay parents heterosexual
absurd.
Also remember that marriage is not necessarily is carried out to design-Ex. In old age,
death, marriage chapter, or powerless, and still remains marriage and family.Children
are also taken by some or added to this new family children of either spouse. To deny
this conception is a lack of respect for the dignity of all people.
Moreover, the experience in countries accepting said that gay families there is a high
emotional and cultural wealth. What also raises the level of the country in terms of
culture, democracy and tolerance, which is our beacon or objective, to grow in every
aspect.
However, in the case of one child affected by the attitude of some, the right attitude and
consistent with human rights and dignity by-state bodies according to the constitutional
order of promotion and respect of human rights, to protect the child if discrimination or
crime and apply appropriate sanctions on those responsible, and if any deny the right of
parenthood. The child should be with the most qualified and trained. On these two
points is the real protection of the interests of the child.
It is unreasonable to protect an interest in bypassing the basic values and human rights
in our constitution, the dignity of the person is above all other considerations, is the
maximum value at Prudential, is the pinnacle of rights, and partly a genuine respect for
the person , leading to a better society.
For all the above and understanding this interesting and important subject in life and
happiness of people, awareness is generated in large social and personal effects,
understanding in a positive and natural.
And for the good of the whole process, "including the legal moralist political
relationship, based on judgmental discourse of power, repression of freedoms that most
suspended for a time-release, generated sharp opposition that always spring up to the
censorship and hypocrisy (not just sex, but in every subject studied), with greater force
and bases, and then as there is, consciousness is born and discourse towards higher
values, in democracy and in favor of free communicative media and social and cultural
progress, growing exponentially in the global world, ensuring the continued progress in
human rights for a better future in prosperity, freedom and respect for all human beings
and their right to integral development especially in an issue as important to the
happiness of people as is their sexuality.
Cristian Carter
May 2009
¿Hetero, gay, bi?, Complejo tema, depende de lo que te conozcas, de lo que sabes, ...en
definitiva tú lo sabes; más allá de la respuesta que puedas dar según el grupo social y
cultural que te rodea; victoriano o conservador, más libre o más demócrata. Si escoges
esconderte o tienes la capacidad de respetar tu dignidad y actuar conforme, o eliges lo
que mejor convenga según lo exige tu familia, tu religión, grupo social o es
conveniente; casarte con quien no amas o no deseas. Ser feliz o una persona disfrazada,
un esclavo de los demás.
-Todo lo cual es sólo una arista de este interesante y complejo tema,
lleno de prejuicios producto de factores culturales e históricos y de suma importancia en
la vida de las personas, que las marca y caracteriza como tal, que las puede hacer feliz,
completa, sana o llena de trastornos, represiones, traumas y frustraciones que pueden
desembocar en otros mas graves, inclusive psicopatologías, que atentan contra una
buena calidad de vida de la persona y quienes le rodean.
-Es cierto, puede ser difícil -como variados aspectos de la vida-; hay
que tener valores claros y ser valiente en ellos, el autoconocimiento y la claridad
valórica en pro de metas superiores dan seguridad en el actuar y mediante una forma
prudente e inteligente en base al respeto y amor se puede obtener cualquier meta, pese al
ambiente adverso que exista, -la gente puede cambiar y puede transformar sus
pensamientos y actos negativos en positivos-
De lo contrario, como ha dicho la experiencia de otros que
he conocido, se soportara por algunos años, hasta que la naturaleza, la conciencia y
sanidad interna broten, con más problemas y una vez que la juventud ya se ha ido.
…Aparte y como dato relacionado en esta nota; es sabido que la mayoría de las
personas no piensa, se deja llevar por la forma y no el fondo de las cosas, por ello la
sociedad es tan manipulable por los políticos y la publicidad, …el 80% de las personas
no entiende lo que se le dice, y más bien asume en base a la forma en que se le expresa
el tema; ello ha sido muy bien aprovechado por los políticos y religiones, llegando a
extremos de consecuencias que la historia conoce, -Verdi Gracia, millones de muertos
por los nazis, en base a la raza, y existiendo una teoría respecto a la superioridad de
unas respecto a otras; o las muertes causadas en la santísima inquisición.
Abominaciones que lamentablemente hasta hoy día siguen sucediendo, aunque G. a D.
en menos medida, ya que la conciencia sobre derechos humanos cada vez toma mas
fuerza.
Este analfabetismo intelectual, en la sexualidad se expresa en aquella
posición negativa de la misma producto de factores históricos (Adán y Eva, "el sexo es
malo”, “cochino", "perverso" salvo que sea para procrear, por ello debes tener culpa por
el placer), político y económico, interés del Estado en manejar la conducta de las
personas (v.gr. en s.XIX, asegurar la población o la existencia de fuerza de trabajo
necesaria para la riqueza), y antes de esto la visión Victoriana, hipócrita (Foucault), en
retroceso de la naturalidad, s. XVII, acentuando la connotación negativa del sexo, el
silencio, el secreto, y la reprobación pública, sexo sólo para la reproducción, todo luego
expresado en el siglo XIX en la ley sacrosanta, única rectora de las vidas, que facilita la
voluntad del gobernante, del rey o grupo múltiple "democrático”, que sigue los mismos
patrones monárquicos despóticos clásicos prescribiendo, prohibiendo , censurando o
declarando lícito o ilícito a través de la norma -poder jurídico al sexo-, privando o
limitando los placeres y libertad, todo para mantener el poder o su control, sin que
exista fundamento objetivo, lógico, científico, ni valórico trascendental, sólo juicios en
consideración a la voluntad de algunos, manejando la ignorancia de muchos, el no
saber del sexo; y sin perjuicio de las celebres y vacías frases como moral y buenas
costumbres, conceptos superados por la ética basada en conciencia, ciencia y valores
trascendentales, derechos humanos, que en un estado democrático moderno y
desarrollado socioculturalmente dirigen el actuar de las personas.
Como dato, en Grecia no se hacían prohibiciones ni sanciones, ni
codificación de las conductas sexuales, ya que no se le daba mayor connotación pública;
sin perjuicio de la existencia de una moral tendiente a la estética de la conducta sexual, -
dietética, económica y erótica- sobre todo en el matrimonio y la relación del maestro
con el alumno. Ética creada por filósofos, para proteger su poder sexual, y no acorde
con los valores que en esta nota resaltamos, de hecho la relación entre hombres de la
misma edad se consideraba inadecuada, asi como tambien en grupos pobres y se dejaba
fuera a las mujeres de estas prerrogativas (Artemidoro).
Es menester abundar sobre la posición moralista sobre la función
procreadora del sexo, asegurando la especie, como si fuéramos esclavos del sistema
estatal ("de la matrix", poder esclavizante del ente despótico) ajenos a derechos
fundamentales, pensamiento perverso que ha generado atrocidades en función de la
sangre; lo que demuestra la vulnerabilidad y facilidad de la relativización del
pensamiento con fines maquiavélicos (poder, dinero, etc) y que el animal "ser humano",
aún dotado de un nivel mejor de complejidad neuronal, no siempre usa la razón en pro
de la bondad, sino que es capaz de justificar toda clase de perversidad y discriminación.
Podemos señalar que la bondad es el actuar más inteligente y sabio a largo plazo, más
educado y adecuado, que atrae el bien y aleja las consecuencias negativas de la
conducta, propias del daño-.
Ahora bien, cosa distinta es el derecho a la vida, que
también es un derecho fundamental que brota de la naturaleza humana; así como la vida
con dignidad. -Debemos hacer notar a esta posición (relación sexual / reproducción),
que en los países en que se han aceptado plenas libertades, países desarrollados social y
culturalmente, todavía siguen naciendo niños y existiendo familias, las que viven en
mayor paz y dignidad de vida. Los humanos siguen procreando y su muerte está más
cercana por otras razones a su causa, como son las lamentables muertes directas o por
enfermedades a causa de la guerra y la contaminación.
-Empero, la tesis sexo negativa, vino a exacerbar el interés
por el sexo de una forma insana (monetarización del mismo, sexo placer privado en
lugares ocultos, sentimiento de culpa, cinismo e hipocresía institucionalizadas;
disfunciones sexuales, como impotencia, frigidez, eyaculación precoz, etc; además de
frustración, infelicidad, llegando hasta psicopatologías, etc.) y crea la necesidad de
expresión narrada o literal del mismo a oscuras, en secreto (v.gr. escritos del Marqués
de Sade, o del autor anónimo de "My secret life", o la confesión ante el sacerdote, la
preocupación por la vida sexual del otro como escándalo), visión que ha trascendido
hasta nuestros días en menor medida, según el nivel socio-cultural o tendencia del grupo
a analizar, gente de mayor rigidez mental y prejuicios arraigados, gente que prefiere
dar énfasis en la protección de los intereses del Estado, como si estuviéramos al servicio
del mismo, u otros más respetuosos de las personas y de su libertad para desarrollarse
en todas sus facetas de su vida, estando el Estando al servicio de la persona. -Es
evidente que la posición moralista que ordena bajo su premisa la sexualidad como
medio de procreación, además de ser ilusoria, es atentatoria a los principios básicos de
una democracia y derechos humanos.
Es básico por todo expuesto que los Estados Demócratas y civilizados deben
aceptar el matrimonio homosexual, ya que no hay razón alguna para impedirlo:
1) En el plano de derechos humanos y normas bases de nuestra constitución,
como lo es la dignidad, el respeto por las personas, su igualdad ante la ley y su libertad,
los gays tienen derecho a casarse y ello no puede ser impedido por el Estado, quien debe
respetar y promover el respeto por las personas. Es un derecho humano la libertad de
una persona para elegir si contrae matrimonio, más allá de su orientación sexual, y un
estado democrático, respeta a las personas y esta al servicio de ellas, sin discriminar
sexo, raza y credo, por lo que debe crear condiciones para su desarrollo integral, tanto
material, psicológico y espiritual.
2) En el plano conductual científico, esta probado que la indemnidad de los
hijos, es decir su libre crecimiento exento de vicios, sobre todo el sexual, no se ve
afectado por la orientación sexual de sus padres, -cosa distinta a lo que sucede cuando
existen abusos de su núcleo en cualquier familia, tanto físico, sicológicos y sexuales,
tanto por acción como negligencia, carencias afectivas, abandono, los que pueden llegar
a crear serios trastornos sicológicos, que afectaran toda la vida de la persona, si no
existe el tratamiento adecuado.
Como señalamos arriba la mayoría de los pedofílicos son heterosexuales
¿por ello debemos prohibir los matrimonios heterosexuales?, o porque la mayoría de
los hijos gays han tenido padres heterosexuales; sería absurdo.
Cristian Carter
mayo 2009