ARELLANO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW II OUTLINE

ATTY ROBERTO A. DEMIGILLO

ARTICLE III, 1987 CONSTITUTION

I. CONCEPT AND ORIGIN OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS

Classification
1. Civil Rights
2. Political Rights
3. Social and Economic Rights

Doctrine of Preferred Freedom (Hierarchy of Rights)

Case : PBM Employees Org. vs. PBM Co., Inc., 51 SCRA 189 (1973)
Duncan Association v Glaxo Wellcome Philippines, G.R.
162994, September 17, 2004.
Star Paper Corporation v. Simbol, G.R. 164774, April 12, 2006

The Fundamental Powers of the State

Similarities, Differences & Limitations

II. POLICE POWER

Definition, Scope & Basis
Characteristics
Who exercises said power?
MMDA v Bel Air Village, GR No. 1`35962, March 27, 2000
Tests of Police Power
Laws and Cases:
Balacuit v. CFI, G.R. No. L-38429, June 30, 1988
Lozano vs. Martinez, 146 SCRA 323 (1986)
Del Rosario vs. Bengzon, 180 SCRA 521 (1989)
Tablarin vs. Judge Gutierrez, 152 SCRA 730 (1987)
Zoning and Regulatory Ordinances:
Ermita-Malate Hotel & Motel Operators v. City Mayor, 20 SCRA 849

(1967)
Cruz vs. Paras, 123 SCRA 569 (1983)
Velasco vs. Villegas, 120 SCRA 568 (1983)
Magtajas vs. Pryce Properties, 234 SCRA 255 (1994)
Tano v. Socrates, G.R. 110249, August 27, 1997
City of Manila v. Judge Laguio, G.R. No. 118127, April 12, 2005
Administrative Rules and Regulations
Bautista vs. Junio, 127 SCRA 329 (1984)
Taxicab Operators of Metro Manila vs. BOT, 119 SCRA 597 (1982)
Mirasol v. DPWH, G.R. No. 158793, June 8, 2006
Anglo-Fil Trading vs. Lazaro, 124 SCRA 494 (1983)
PPA v. Cipres Stevedoring, G.R. No. 145742, July 14, 2005
Chavez v. Romulo, G.R. No. 157036. June 9, 2004

Additional Cases GMA Network Inc v. Comelec, GR 205357, Sept 2, 2014

III. EMINENT DOMAIN

Definition
Bardillon v Barangau Masili GR. 146886 April 30, 2003
Estate of JBL Reyes v City of Manila GR 132431 Feb. 13, 2004

Who exercises the power?

City of Manila vs. Chinese Cemetery of Manila, 40 Phil 349 (1919)
Moday v. Court of Appeals, 268 SCRA 368 (1997)
Constitutional limitation - Art. II, Sec. 9
Distinguished from destruction due to necessity
 2

Objects of Expropriation
RP. v. PLDT, 26 SCRA 620 (1969)
Where Expropriation Suit is Filed
Barangay San Roque v. Heirs of Pastor, GR 138896 June 20, 2000
Taking
Definition and scope
Requisites of Taking
Republic vs. Castelvi, 58 SCRA 336 (1974)
City Govt. of Quezon City vs. Ericta, 122 SCRA 759 (1983)
Deprivation of Use
Republic vs. Fajardo , 104 Phil.443 (1958)
Napocor vs. Gutierrez, 193 SCRA 1 (1991)
Napocor v. San Pedro, G.R. 170945, September 26, 2006
U.S. v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256 (1946)
PPI v. Comelec, 244 SCRA 272 (1995) BATAOIL
Priority in Expropriation
Filstream International v. CA, 284 SCRA 716 (1998) CASTRO
City of Mandaluyong v. Francisco, G.R. No. 137152, January 29, 2001 CONVENTO
Lagcao v. Judge Labra, G.R. No. 155746, October 13, 2004 DE LEON
JIL v. Mun. of Pasig, G.R. 152230, August 9, 2005 DEL MUNDO
Public use
Heirs of Juancho Ardona vs. Reyes, 125 SCRA 220 (1983) DE LA CRUZ JETHRO
Sumulong vs. Guerrero, 154 SCRA 461 (1987) DE LA CRUZ KARL
Province of Camarines Sur vs. CA, 222 SCRA 170 (1993) DIMACULANGAN
Manosca v. Court of Appeals, 252 SCRA 412 (1996) JIMENO
Estate of Jimenez v. PEZA, G.R. No. 137285, January 16, 2001 MAZO
Mactan Cebu Inetrnational Airport v Lozada Jr. MORTEL
Government Withdrawal
NHA v. Heirs of Isidro Guivelondo, G.R. No. 154411. June 19, 2003 NUEZ
NPC & Pobre v. CA, G.R. No. 106804. August 12, 2004 REMIGIO
Recovery of Expropriated Land
ATO v. Gopuco, G.R. No. 158563, June, 30 2005 SAGUN
Republic v. Lim, G.R. 161656, June 29, 2005 SAMSON
Genuine Necessity/ Judicial Review
Mun. of Meycayauan vs. IAC, 157 SCRA 640 (1988) TIANGCO
De Knecht vs. Bautista, 100 SCRA 660 (1980) ALIAS
Republic vs. De Knecht, G.R. 87351, February 12, 1990 BAULA
De la Paz Masikip v. Judge Legaspi, G.R. No. 136349, January 23, 2006 CAPELLAN

Just Compensation
Defined
Eslaban v. De Onorio, G.R. No. 146062, June 28, 2001 CASIANO
RP vs. IAC, et al., G.R. No. 71176, May 21, 1990 CATALAN
Determination of Just Compensation
EPZA vs. Dulay, 149 SCRA 305 (1987) FERRER
When Determined
Ansaldo vs. Tantuico, G.R. 50147 August 3, 1990 GAL
NAPOCOR v. Tiangco, G.R. No. 170846, February 6, 2007 GARCIA
City of Cebu v. Spouses Dedamo, G.R. No. 142 971, May 07, 2002JOVELLANOS
Manner of Payment
Assoc.of Small Landowners v. DAR, 175 SCRA 343 (1989) KALUGDAN
DAR v. CA, 249 SCRA 149 (1995) LACUESTA
Trial with Commissioners
Meralco v. Pineda, 206 SCRA 196 (1992) LAYUGAN
NPC v. Henson, G.R. No. 129998, December 29, 1998 MAJUELO
Napocor v. Sps. De la Cruz, G.R. No. 156093, February 2, 2007 MASCARINAS
Leca Realty v. Republic, G.R. No. 155605, September 27, 2006 MILLAN
Legal Interest for Expropriation Cases
NPC v. Angas, 208 SCRA 542 (1992) MONTON
Wycoco v. Judge Castillo, G.R. No. 146733, January 13, 2004 NEPOMUCENO
Writ of Possession
City of Manila v. Oscar Serrano, G.R. No. 142304, June 20, 2001 NICOLAS
 3

Republic v. Gingoyon, G.R. No. 166429, December 19, 2005 ORDA

Expropriation of Utilities, Landed Estates and Municipal Property
Art. XII, Sec. 18
Art. XIII, Sec. 4
Art. XIII, Sec. 9
City of Baguio vs. Nawasa, 106 Phil. 114 (1959) RIVERA
Zamboanga del Norte vs. City of Zamboanga, 22 SCRA 1334 (1968) SILVERIO

NEW CASES LBP v. Honeycomb Farms Corp.,. GR169903 Feb 29, 2012 - TAGAROMA
NAPOCOR v YCLA Sugar Development Cor, Dec 11, 2013 TAGAROMA
Manila Memorial Park v Sec of DSWD, Dec. 3, 2013 VARGAS
___________________________________________________________

IV. TAXATION

Definition and Nature

Purpose
CIR vs. Algue, Inc., 158 SCRA 9 (1988) VARGAS
Commissioner vs. Makasiar, 177 SCRA 27 (1989) BATAOIL
Scope (The power to tax is the power to destroy)
Who exercises the power?
Art. VI Sec. 28
Art. XIV, Sec. 4 (3)
Art. X, Sec. 5
Tax Exemptions
YMCA vs. CIR, 33 Phil. 217 (1916) CASTRO
Bishop of Nueva Segovia vs. Provincial Board, 51 Phil. 352 (1927) CONVENTO
Lladoc vs. CIR, 14 SCRA 292 (1965) DE LEON
Province of Abra vs. Hernando, 107 SCRA 104 (1981) DEL MUNDO
Abra Valley College vs. Aquino , 162 SCRA 106 (1988) DE LA CRUZ J.
American Bible Society vs. City of Manila, 101 Phil. 386 (1957) DE LA CRUZ K.
Double Taxation
Punzalan vs. Municipal Board of Manila, 95 Phil.46 (1954) DIMACULANGAN
License Fees
Physical Therapy Org. vs. Municipal Board, G.R. 10448, August 30, 1957 JIMENO

V. DUE PROCESS

Art. III, Sec. I, 1987 Constitution

Art. III. Sec. 14 (1)
Definition, Nature and Scope
Purpose of the guaranty
Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884) MAZO
Meaning of Life, Liberty, and Property
Case IMBONG V OCHOA, GR 204819, April 8, 2014 MORTEL
Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health, NUEZ
Lozada v Arroyo, April 24, 2012 REMIGIO
Navia v Pardico, June 19, 2012 SAGUN

Substantive Due Process

Villegas vs. Hu Chong Tsai Pao Ho, 86 SCRA 275 (1978) SAMSON
Rubi vs. Prov. Board of Mindoro, 39 Phil. 660 (1919) TIANGCO
United States v Toribio 15 Phil 85 ALIAS
Ynot v Intermediate Appellate Court 148 SCRA 659 ARENA
Churchill v Raffarty 32 Phil 580 BAULA
People v Fajardo 100 Phil 443 CAPELLAN
Acebedo Optical v Court of Appeals GR 100152 March 31, 2000 CASIANO
Lawrence v Texas June 26, 2003CATALAN
White Light Corp. v City of Manila GR 122846 January 20, 2009 FERRER
Magtajas v Pryce Properties GR 111097 July 20, 1994 GAL
Bennis v Michigan No. 94-8729 March 4, 1996 GARCIA
 4

M. Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health No. 88-1503 June

25, 1990 JOVELLANOS
Beltran v Secretary of Health G.R. No. 133640, November 25, 2005 KALUGDAN
Manalo v PNP Chief GR 178920 October 15, 2007 LACUESTA
Lucena Grand Central Terminal Inc. v JAC Liner, Inc. GR 148339 Feb.
23, 2005 LAYUGAN
Void for Vagueness/Overbreadth
Ople v. Torres, 292 SCRA 141. (1998) MAJUELO
Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, November 19, 2001 MASCARINAS
David v. Arroyo, G.R. No. 171390, May 3, 2006 MILLAN
Ong v. Sandiganbayayn, G.R. No. 126858, September 16, 2005 MONTON
Southern Hemisphere Engagement Network Inc. v Anti-Terrorism Council, October 5,
2010 NEPOMUCENO
Disini Jr. v Secretary of Justice, Feb 11, 2014 NICOLAS

Procedural Due Process

Publication Requirement
Tanada v. Tuvera, 146 SCRA 446 (1986)
PITC v. Angeles, 263 SCRA 421 (1996)
Republic v. Extelcom, G.R. 147096, January 15, 2002
Impartial Court or Tribunal
Tanada vs. PAEC, 141 SCRA 307 (1986)
Anzaldo vs. Clave , 119 SCRA 353 (1982)
Tejano v. Ombudsman, G.R. No. 159190, June 30, 2005
Tumey vs. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1997)
People v. Court of Appeals, 262 SCRA 452 (1996)
Tabuena v. Sandiganbayan, 268 SCRA 332 (1997)
Prejudicial Publicity
Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966)
Webb v. De Leon, 247 SCRA 652 (1995)
People v. Sanchez, G.R. No. 121039, October 18, 2001
Notice and Hearing:
Summary Dismissal Board v. Torcita, 330 SCRA 153 (2000)
Secretary of Justice v. Lantion, G.R. No. 139466, October 17, 2000
People vs. Estrada G.R. No. 130487 June 19, 2000
Lim v. Court of Appeals, G.R. 111397, August 12, 2002
Legaspi v City of Cebu GR. 159110Dec. 10, 2013

Opportunity to be Heard
Budiongan v. De la Cruz, G.R. No. 170288, September 22, 2006
Roxas v. Vasquez, G.R. 114944, June 21, 2001
Marohombsar v. Judge Adiong, A.M. RTJ-02-1674, January 22, 2004
Exceptions to notice and hearing requirements
Philcomsat vs. Alcuaz, 180 SCRA 218 (1989)
Suntay vs. People, 101 Phil. 833 (1957)
De Bisshop vs. Galang, 8 SCRA 244 (1963)
Var Orient Shipping Co., Inc. vs. Achacoso, 161 SCRA 232 (1988)
Administrative Due Process
Ang Tibay vs. CIR, 69 Phil. 635 (1940)
Montemayor vs. Araneta University Foundation, 77 SCRA 321 (1977)
Meralco vs. PSC, 11 SCRA 317 (1964)
Ateneo vs. CA, 145 SCRA 100 (1986)
Alcuaz vs. PSBA, 161 SCRA 7 (1988)
Non vs. Hon. Dames, G.R. No. 89317, May 30, 1990
Fabella v Court of Appeals GR 110379 November 28, 1997
Lao Gi Alias chia v Court of Appeals 180 SCRA 756
People v Nazario 165 SCRA 186
Corona v United Harbor Pilots GR 111953 December 12, 1997
Army Navy Club v Court of Appeals GR 110223 April 8, 1997
J. Gonzales v NLRC and Ateneo de Davao. GR 125735 August 26, 1999

NEW CASES Pichay v. Offiice of the Deputy Executive Sec for Legal affairs, GR 196425 24 July
 5

2012

______________________________________________________________________________

VI. EQUAL PROTECTION

Political, Economic and Social Equality

Art. XIII, Sec. 1 and 2 (social justice)
Id., Sec. 3 (protection to labor)
Art. XII, Sec. 10 (nationalization of business)
Id., Sec. 2, par. 2 (reservation of marine resources)
Art. II, Sec. 11 (free access to the courts)
Art. VIII, Sec. 5(5) (legal aid to poor)
Art. IX-C, Sec. 10 (protection of candidates)
Art. II, Sec. 26 (public service)
Art. II, Sec. 14 (equality of women and men)
Sexual Discrimination
Phil. Association of Service Exporters vs. Drilon, 163 SCRA 386 (1988)
Administration of Justice
People vs. Hernandez, 99 Phil. 515 (1956)
People vs. Isinain, 85 Phil. 648 (1950)
Chavez v. PCGG, G.R. 130716, December 9, 1998
Nunez vs. Sandiganbayan, 111 SCRA 433 (1982)
Gallardo v. People, G.R. 142030, April 21, 2005
Public Policy
Central Bank Employees Assoc. v. BSP, G.R. No. 148208, Dec. 15, 2004
PNB v. Palma, G.R. 157279, August 9, 2005
Unido vs. COMELEC, 104 SCRA 17 (1981)
PJA vs. Prado, 227 SCRA 703 (1993)
Olivarez v. Sandiganbayan, 248 SCRA 700 (1995)
Tiu v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 127410, January 20, 1999
Coconut Oil Refiners v. Torres, G.R. 132527, July 29, 2005
ISAE v. Quisumbing, G.R. No. 128845, June 1, 2000
PHILRECA vs. DILG, G.R. No. 143076. June 10, 2003
Beltran v. Secretary of Health, G.R. No. 133640, November 25, 2005
People v Cayat 68 Phil 12, 18
Dumlao v Comelec 96 SCRA 392
Goesart v Cleary 335 U.S. 464
Ormoc Sugar Central v Ormoc City L-23794 Feb. 17, 1968
Sison v Ancheta 130 SCRA 654
Himagan v People GR 113811 October 7, 1994
Phil Judges Assn. v Prado GR 105371 November 11, 1993
De Guzman Jr. v Comelec GR 129118 July 19, 2000
Phil Telegraph and Telephone v NLRC GR 118978 May 23, 1997
Parreno v CA GR 162224 June 7, 2007
Central Bank Employees v Bangko senta GR 148208 Dec. 15, 2004 l
Serrano v Gallant Maritime Services GR 167614 March 24, 2009
British American Tobacco v CamachoGR 163583 April 15, 2009
Quinto and Tolentino v Comelec GR 189698 Feb. 22, 2010

NEW CASES Disini Jr. v Sec. of Justice GR 203335, Feb 11, 2014 Strict scrutiny test
SM Metals Inc. v Reyes GR 179669 June 4, 2014
______________________________________________________________

VII. THE NON-IMPAIRMENT CLAUSE

Art. III, Sec. 10

Purpose
When impairment occurs
When allowed
Emergency Powers
Rutter vs. Esteban, 93 Phil. 68 (1953)
 6

Zoning and Regulatory Ordinances

Villanueva vs. Castaneda, 154 SCRA 142 (1987)
Sangalang vs. IAC, 168 SCRA 634 (1988)
Ortigas & Co. v. A, G.R. No. 126102, December 4, 2000
Home Building and Loan assn. v Blaisdell 290 U.S. 398
Juarez v Court of Appeals GR 93474 October 9, 1992
Administrative Regulations
Tiro vs. Hontanosas, 125 SCRA 697 (1983)
Rental Laws
Caleon vs. Agus Development Corp., 207 SCRA 748 (1992)
Tax Exemptions
Meralco v. Province of Laguna, 306 SCRA 750 (1999)

_____________________________________________________________

VIII. ARRESTS, SEARCHES AND SEIZURES

Art. III, Sec. 2 and 3
Purpose and Importance of the guaranty
Alvero v. Dizon, 76 Phil 637 (1946)
To Whom Directed
People vs. Andre Marti, 193 SCRA 57 (1991)
Who May Invoke the Right?
Bache and Co., vs. Ruiz, 37 SCRA 323 (1971)
Stonehill v. Diokno, 20 SCRA 383 (1967)
Zurcher vs. Stanford Daily, 436 U. S. 547 (1978)
Wilson v. Layne, 98-0083, May 24, 1999
Conditions for a valid warrant
Existence of Probable Cause
Burgos vs. Chief of Staff, 133 SCRA 800 (1984)
Chandler v. Miller, April 15, 1997, D-96-126
People v. Chua Ho San, 308 SCRA 432) (1999)
People v. Molina, G.R. No. 133917, February 19, 2001
Partially Valid Warrant
People v. Salanguit, G.R. 133254, April 18, 2001
Microsoft Corp. v. Maxicorp., G.R. 140946, September 13, 2004
Personal determination by judge
Sta. Rosa Mining Co., vs. Fiscal Zabala, 153 SCRA 367 (1987)
Paderanga vs. Drilon, G.R. 96080, April 19, 1991
Pita vs. CA, 178 SCRA 362 (1987)
Abdula v. Guiani. 326 SCRA 1 (2000)
People v. Mamaril, G.R. 147607, January 22, 2004
Examination of witnesses
Pasion Vda. De Garcia vs. Locsin, 65 Phil 68 (1938)
Yee Sue Kuy vs. Almeda, 70 Phil. 141, (1940)
Alvarez vs. CFI, 64 Phil. 33 (1937)
Mata vs. Bayona , 128 SCRA 388 (1984)
Particularity of description
Olaes vs. People, 155 SCRA 486 (1987)
Prudente vs. Judge Dayrit, 180 SCRA 69 (1989)
Chia vs. Coll. of Customs, 177 SCRA 755 (1989)
20th Century Fox Film Corp. vs. CA, 164 SCRA 655 (1988)
People v. Choi, G.R. No. 152950, August 3, 2006
Nolasco vs. Cruz Pano, 132 SCRA 152 (1985)
PICOP v. Asuncion, 307 SCRA 253) (1999)
Yousef Al Ghoul vs. C.A, GR No.126859, September 4, 2001
Del Rosario v. People G.R. No. 142295, May 31,2001).
Objects of Seizure
Rule 126, Sec. 3, Rules of Court (ROC)
Unilab v. Isip, G.R. No. 163858, June 28, 2005
Warrantless searches
Valid Waiver
People vs. Omaweng, 213 SCRA 462 (1992)
 7

People v. Correa, 285 SCRA 679 (1998)

People vs. Ramos, G.R. 85401-02, June 4, 1990
People v. Barros, 231 SCRA 557 (1994)
Veroy vs. Layague, 210 SCRA 97 (1992)
People vs. Damaso, 212 SCRA 457 (1992)
Lopez vs. Comm. Of Customs, 68 SCRA 320 (1975)
Caballes v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 136292, January 5, 2002
People vs. Asis, et. al., G.R. No. 142531, October 15, 2002
People vs. Tudtud, et. al., G.R. No. 144037, September 26, 2003
Incident to lawful arrest
Rule 126, Section 13, Rules of Court
Chimel vs. California, 395 U. S. 752 (1964)
People vs. de la Cruz, G.R. 83988, April 18, 1990
People v. Kalubiran, 196 SCRA 645 (1991)
People v. Malmstedt, 198 SCRA 401 (1991)
Espano v. Court of Appeals, 288 SCRA 558 (1998)
People vs. Tangliben, 184 SCRA 220 (1990)
People v. Che Chun Ting, 328 SCRA 592 (2000)
People vs. Estrella, G.R. Nos. 138539-40, January 21, 2003
People vs. Libnao, et al., G.R. No. 136860, January 20, 2003
Plain view doctrine
People v. Musa, 217 SCRA 597 (1993)
Padilla v. CA, 269 SCRA 402 (1997)
People v. Valdez, G.R. No. 129296, September 25, 2000
Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 [1987]}
People v. Compacion, G.R. No. 124442, July 20, 2001
People v. Huang Zhen Hua, G.R. 139301, September 29, 2004
Enforcement of fishing, customs and immigration laws
Roldan vs. Area, 65 SCRA 320 (1975)
People v. Gatward, 267 SCRA 785 (1997)
People v. Johnson, G.R. No. 138881, December 18, 2000
People vs. Suzuki, G.R. No. 120670, October 23, 2003
Stop and frisk
Terry vs. Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968)
People v. Solayao, 262 SCRA 255 (1996)
Manalili v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 113447, October 7, 1997
Malacat v. Court of Appeals, 283 SCRA 159 (1997)
Florida v. J.L., 98-1993, March 28, 2000
Search of moving vehicles
Papa vs. Mago, 22 SCRA 857 (1968)
People vs. CFI of Rizal, 101 SCRA 86 (1980)
Salvador v. People, G.R. No. 146706, July 15, 2005
Whren v. United States, 95-5841, January 10, 1996
Emergency circumstances
People vs. De Gracia 233 SCRA 716 (1994)
Checkpoints
Gen. De Villa vs. Valmonte G.R. No. 83988, May 24, 1990
Aniag vs. Comelec, 237 SCRA 424 (1994)
People v. Usana, 323 SCRA 754 (2000)
People v. Vinecario, G.R. No. 141137, January 20, 2004
Inspection of buildings
Camara vs. Municipal Court, 387 U. S. 523 (1967)
Warrantless arrests
Rule 113, Sec. 5
Art. 125, Revised Penal Code
Rebellion as Continuing Offense
Umil vs. Ramos, G. R. 81567, July 9, 1990
Committed in the Presence of Police Officers
People v. Sucro, 195 SCRA 388 (1991)
People v. Luisito Go, G.R. No. 116001, March 14, 2001
Personal Knowledge of the Offense
People vs. Gerente, 219 SCRA 756 (1993)
 8

People v. Sinoc, 275 SCRA 357 (1997)

People v. Baula, G.R. No. 132671, November 15, 2000
People v. Cubcubin, G.R. No. 136267, July 10, 2001
Time of Arrest
People vs. Rodrigueza, 205 SCRA 791 (1992)
Go vs. Court of Appeals, 206 SCRA 586 (1992)
People v. Calimlim, G.R. No. 123980, August 30. 2001
Marked Money
People vs. Enrile, 222 SCRA 586 (1993)
Lack of Urgency
People v. Pasudag, G.R. No. 128822, May 4, 2001
People vs. Aminnudin, 163 SCRA 402 (1988)
Effect of Bail
Rule 114, Section 26
Effect of Entry of Plea
People v. Plana G.R. No. 128285, November 27, 2001
Validity of Conviction
People v. Conde, G.R. No. 113269, April 10, 2001

NEW CASES Del Castillo v People, GR 185128, Jan 30, 2012 -

Luz v People, GR 197788, 29 Feb. 2012
People v Lara, GR 199877 Aug 13, 2012
People v Belocura GR 173474 Aug 29, 2012
____________________________________________________________

IX. PRIVACY OF COMMUNICATION & CORRESPONDENCE

R.A. No. 4200 (Anti-Wire Tapping Law) (1965)
Arts, 290, 291, 292 and 299. Revised Penal Code.
Gaanan vs. IAC, 145 SCRA 113 (1986)
Katz vs. U.S., 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
Ramirez vs. CA, G.R. No. 93833, September 28, 1995
Salcedo-Ortanez v. CA, 235 SCRA 111 (1994)
Alejano v. Cabuay, G.R. No. 160792, August 25, 2005
Privileged Communications
In Re Laureta, 148 SCRA 382 (1987)
People vs. Albofera, 152 SCRA 123 (1987)
Zulueta v. Court of Apeals, 253 SCRA 699 (1996)
Deano v. Godinez, 12 SCRA 483 (1964)
Waterhouse Drug Corporation v. NLRC, G.R. No. 113271. October 16, 1997
Exclusionary Rule
Art. III, Sec. 3(2)
Silverthorne Lumber vs. US, 251 US 385 (1920)
People v. Aruta, G. R. 120915, April 3. 1998
People v. Rondero, G.R. 125687, December 9, 1999
Liability for damages
Aberca vs. Ver, 160 SCRA 590 (1989)

CASES Ople v Torres GR 127685 July 23, 1998

Vivares v St. Theresas College, GR 202666 September 29, 2014
_____________________________________________________________________________

X. RIGHTS OF PERSONS UNDER CUSTODIAL INVESTIGATION

Art. III, Sec , 12
Miranda vs. Arizona , 384 US , 436 (1966)
Custodial Investigation
People v. Lugod, G.R. 136253, February 21, 2001
People v. Del Rosario G.R. 127755, April 14, 1999
People v. Bolanos, 211 SCRA 262 (1992)
Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291, [1980]
People v. Mahinay, 302 SCRA 455 (1999)
Administrative Investigations
People vs. Judge Ayson, 175 SCRA 216 (1989)
 9

Office of the Court Administrator v. Sumilang, 271 SCRA 316 (1997)

People v. Uy, G.R. No. 157399, November 17, 2005
Police Lineup
Gamboa vs.Cruz, 162 SCRA 642 (1988)
United States v. Wade, 388 U.A. 218 (1967)
People v. Escordial, G.R. 138934, January 16, 2002
People vs. Piedad, et al., G.R. No. 131923, December 5, 2002
Cases before January 17, 1973 not applicable
Magtoto vs.Manguera, 63 SCRA 4 (1975)
Rule under the 1973 Constitution (Voluntary, knowing & intelligent waiver)
People vs. Caguioa, 95 SCRA 2 (1980)
People vs. Tampus, 90 SCRA 624 (1980)
People v. Sayaboc, G.R. 147201, January 15, 2004
The Galit Rule
People vs. Galit, 135 SCRA 465 (1985)
Rule under the 1987 Constitution
Requirement of Competent & Independent Counsel
People vs. Bandula, 232 SCRA 566 (1994)
People v. Quidato, G.R. 117401, October 1, 1998
People v. Januario. 267 SCRA 608 (1997)
People v. Labtan, GR. No. 12793, December 8, 1999
People vs. Samus, G.R. 135957-58, September 17, 2002
People v. Tomaquin, G.R. No. 133138, July 23, 2004
People v. Bagnate, G.R. No. 133685-86 May 20, 2004
Counsel of Choice
People vs. Gallardo, G.R. No. 113684, Jan. 25, 2000
People vs. Barasina, 229 SCRA 450 (1994)

Counsels presence required in entire proceedings

People v. Morial, G.R. 129295, August 15, 2001
Seized Articles
People v. Castro. 274 SCRA 115 (1997)
People v. Wong Chuen Ming. 256 SCRA 182 (1996)
Marcelo v. Sandiganbayan, 302 SCRA 102 (1999)
People v. Macabalang, G.R. 168694, November 27, 2006
Confession to Newsmen
People v. Andan. 269 SCRA 95 (1997)
People v. Endino, G.R. 133026, February 20, 2001
People vs. Ordono, G.R. No. 132154, June 29, 2000
People vs. Guillermo, GR. No. 147786, January 20, 2004
Other Confessions
People v. Malngan, G.R. No. 170470, September 26, 2006
People v. Gomez, 270 SCRA 432 (1997)
Illinois v. Perkins, 496 U.S. 292 (1990)
People v. Lugod, G.R. 136253, February 21, 2001
Re-enactment
People v. Luvendino, 211 SCRA 36 (1992)
Exclusionary rule
Art. III, Sec. 12 (3)
Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine
People v. Alicando 251 SCRA 293 (1995)
Harris vs. New York, 401 U.S. 222 (1971)
New York vs. Quarles, 104 S. U. 2626 (1984)

NEW CASES People v Lauga, GR 186228 15 March 2010

Luz v People, 29 Feb 2012, road side questioning
Tanengge v People, GR 179448 June 26,2013
_______________________________________________________

XI. RIGHT TO BAIL

Art. III, Sec. 13
 10

Bail Defined
Rule 114, Section 1, ROC
Kinds of Bail
Rule 114, Sections 10, 11, 14 & 15
When right may be invoked
Herras Teehankee vs. Rovira, 75 Phil. 634 (1945)
People vs. San Diego, 26 SCRA 522 (1968)
Cortes v. Judge Catral, A.M. No. RTJ-97-1387, September 10, 1997
Lavides v. CA, G.R. No. 129670. February 1, 2000
Government v. Judge Puruganan, G.R. 148571, December 17, 2002
Procedure for bail
Paderanga v. Drilon, 247 SCRA 741, (1995).
Go v. Bongolan. A.M. 99-1464, July 26, 1999
People v. Gako, G.R. 135045, December 15, 2000
Bail and Habeas Corpus
Enrile vs. Salazar, 186 SCRA 217 (1990)
People vs. Judge Donato, 198 SCRA 130 (1991)
Bail on appeal
People vs. Fortes, 223 SCRA 619 (1993)
Maguddatu v. CA, G.R. No. 139599. February 23, 2000
Obosa v. Court of Appeals, G.R. 114350, January 16, 1997
Standards for fixing bail
Rule 114, Sec. 9
Villasenor vs. Abano, 21 SCRA 312 (1967)
De la Camara vs. Enage, 41 SCRA 1 (1971)
Almeda vs. Villaluz, 66 SCRA 38 (1975)
Yap v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 141529, June 6, 2001
Cabaero v. Caon, A.M. No. MTJ-01-369, September 20, 2001
Victory Liner v. Belosillo, G.r. 425 SCRA 79 (2004)
Bail and the Right to Travel Abroad
Manotoc vs. Court of Appeals, 142 SCRA 149 (1980)

XII. RIGHTS OF AN ACCUSED

Art. III, Sec. 14, 1987 Constitution

Presumption of Innocence
Proof beyond reasonable doubt
People vs. Dramayo, 42 SCRA 59 (1971)
Order of Trial
Alejandro vs. Pepito, 96 SCRA 322 (1988)(modified by Rule 119 Sec. 3 (e)
Presumption of Guilt
Dumlao vs. Comelec, 95 SCRA 392 (1980)
People vs. Mingoa, 92 Phil. 857 (1953)
Applicability to Juridical Persons
Feeder Intl Line vs. CA CR 94262 May 31, 1991
Official Duty
People vs. Martos, 211 SCRA 805 (1992)
Equipoise Rule
Corpuz vs. People, 194 SCRA 73 (1991)
Dizon Paminatuan v. People, July 11, 1994

Right to be heard personally or by counsel

Importance of Counsel
People vs. Holgado, 85 Phil. 752 (1950)
Delgado vs. CA, 145 SCRA 357 (1986)
Improvident Plea of guilt
People vs. Baluyot, 75 SCRA 148 (1977)
People vs. Magsi, 124 SCRA 69 (1983)
People v. Besonia, G.R. No. 151284-85, February 5, 2004
People v. Murillo, G.R. No. 134583, July 14, 2004
Right to Lawyer of Choice
 11

People vs. Malunsing, 63 SCRA 493(1975)

Libuit v. People, G.R. No. 154363, September 13, 2005
Deprivation of Right to be Heard
Moslares v. CA, 291 SCRA 440 (1998)

Right to be informed of nature and cause of accusation

Lack of Arraignment
Borja vs. Mendoza, 77 SCRA 422 (1977)
People v. Alcalde, G.R. 139225, May 29, 2002
People v. Dy, G.R. 115236, January 29, 2002
Sufficiency of the Information
People v. Sadiosa, 290 SCRA 82 (1998)
People v. Perez, G.R. No. 122764, September 24, 1998
People v. Lozano, G.R 125080, September 25, 1998
People v. Ladrillo, GR. No. 124342, December 8, 1999
People v. Valdesancho, G.R. 137051, May 30, 2001
People v. Alcaide, G.R. Nos. 139225-28, May 29, 2002
People vs. Ostia, G.R. No. 131804, February 26, 2003
People vs. Flores Jr., G.R. No. 128823-24, December 27, 2002
People v. Cachapero, G.R. No. 153008, May 20, 2004

Right to speedy, impartial and public trial

Speedy trial
Acevedo vs. Sarmiento, 36 SCRA 247 (1970)
People vs. Judge Laya, 161 SCRA 327 (1988)
Conde vs. Rivera, 45 Phil. 650 (1924)
Dacanay vs. People, 240 SCRA 490 (1995)
People v. Rivera, G.R. No. 139180, July 31, 2001
Solar Team Entertainment v. How, G.R. No. 140863, August 22, 2000
Valencia v. Sandiganbayan. G.R. No. 165996, October 17, 2005
Domondon v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 166606. November 29, 2005
Villareal v People,. Feb 1, 2012

Public trial
Garcia vs. Domingo, 52 SCRA 143 (1970)
Perez v. Estrada, A.M. No. 01-4-03-SC, June 29, 2001
Impartial trial
Tumey vs. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927)
Soriano vs Angeles, G.R. No. 109920. August 31, 2000

Right to confront witnesses

U.S. v. Javier, 37 Phil. 449 (1918)

Right to secure attendance of witnesses

U.S. vs. Garcia, 10 Phil. 384 (1908)
People vs. Sandal, 54 Phil. 883 (1938)
People vs. De Luna, 174 SCRA 204 (1989)

Right to be present during trial

Trial in absentia
Rule 115, Sec. 1 (c)
People vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 140285, September 27, 2006
 12

When presence of the accused is a duty:

Arraignment and plea
Rule 116, Sec. 1 (b)
During trial for identification
Aquino vs. Military Commission No. 63 SCRA 546 (1975)
People vs. Salas, 143 SCRA 163 (1986)
Promulgation of sentence
Rule 120, Sec. 6
Exception: Light offenses

Privilege against Self-Incrimination

Art. III, Sec. 17
Scope covers compulsory testimonial incrimination
United States vs. Tan Teh, 23 Phil. 145 (1912)
United States vs. Ong Siu Hong, 36 Phil. 735 (1917)
People vs. Otadura, 86 Phil. 244 (1950)
Villaflor vs. Summers, 41 Phil. 62 (1920)
Bermudez vs. Castillo, 64 Phil. 485 (1937)
Beltran v. Samson, 53 Phil. 570 (1929)
People vs. Tranca, 235 SCRA 455 (1994)
South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553 (1983)
Schemerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966)
People v. Rondero, GR. No. 125687, December 9, 1999
People vs. Gallarde, G.R. No. 133025. February 17, 2000.
In what proceedings available
Pascual vs. Board of Medical Examiners, 28 SCRA 344 (1969)
Galman vs. Pamaran, 138 SCRA 274 (1985)
Use Immunity v. Transactional Immunity.
Art. XIII, Sec. 18 (8)
R.A. No. 1379, Section 8
Galman vs. Pamaran, 138 SCRA 274 (1985)
Brown v. Walker, 161 U.S. 591
Exclusionary rule
Art. II, Sec. 12 (3)
Effect of denial of privilege by court
Chavez vs. Court of Appeals, 24 SCRA 663 (1968)

___________________________________________________________________

RIGHT TO Speedy Disposition of Cases

Art. III, Sec. 16
Art. VIII, Sec. 15
Art. VII, Sec. 19 par. 3
Art. IX, A, Sec. 17
Duterte v. Sandiganbayan, 289 SCRA 721 (1998)
Tatad vs. Sandiganbayan ; 159 SCRA 70 (1988)
Licaros v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. 145851, November 22, 2001
Dimayacyac v. Judge Roxas, G.R. No. 136264, May 28, 2004
Bernat v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 158018. May 20, 2004

New Case Coscolluella v Sandiganbayan, July 15, 2013

_______________________________________________________________________

XIII. PUNISHMENTS
Excessive fines and cruel, degrading and inhuman punishments
People vs. Dela Cruz, 92 Phil. 906 (1953)
People vs. Borja, 91 SCRA 340 (1978)
People vs. Dacuycuy, 173 SCRA 90 (1989)
Loiusiana v. Resweber, 329 U.S. 459 (1947)
Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 [1986]
 13

Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002)

The death penalty
Echegaray v. Secretary of Justice, G.R. No. 132601 January 19, 1999

_______________________________________________________________________

XIV. INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE

Art. III, Sec. 18
Aclaracion vs. Gatmaitan, 64 SCRA 131 (1979)

________________________________________________________________________

XV. IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT

Art. III, Sec. 20

Sura vs. Martin, 26 SCRA 286 (1969)
People vs. Nitafan, 207 SCRA 726 (1992)
In Re: Habeas Corpus of Benjamin Vergara, G.R. No. 154037. April 30, 2003

_________________________________________________________________

XV. EX POST FACTO LAWS AND BILLS OF ATTAINDER

Art III, Sec. 22

Kay Villegas Kami, 35 SCRA 429 (1970)
People vs. Ferrer, 48 SCRA 382 (1972)
People vs. Sandiganbayan, 211 SCRA 241 (1992)
Wright vs. CA, 235 SCRA 341 (1994)

XVI. DOUBLE JEOPARDY

Art. III, Sec. 21

Rule 117, Sec. 7
Rule 120, Sec. 5
Elements
People vs. Obsania, 23 SCRA 1249 (1968)
Subsequent prosecution barred; Exceptions
Melo vs. People, 85 Phil. 766 (1959)
People vs.Yorac, 42 SCRA 230 (1971) (overruled)
PSB v. Bermoy, G.R. No. 151912, September 26, 2005
Heirs of Rillorta vs. Firme, 157 SCRA 518 (1988)
People vs. Miraflores, 115 SCRA 586 (1982)
People vs. Judge Vergara, 221 SCRA 560 (1993)
Tupaz v. Ulep, GR. No. 127777, October 1, 1999
Argel v. Judge Pascua, A.M. No. RTJ-94-1131, August 20, 2001
Jurisdiction of Courts
People v. Bocar, 138 SCRA 166 (1985)
Galman vs Sandiganbayan, 144 SCRA 43 (1986)
People vs. Grospe, 157 SCRA 154 (1988)
People vs. Judge Santiago, 174 SCRA 143 (1989)
Identity of Acts
People vs. Relova, 148 SCRA 292 (1987)
Identity of Offenses
People vs. City Court, 154 SCRA 175 (1987)
Nierras vs. Dacuycuy, 181 SCRA 1 (1990)
Military Court Proceedings
Cruz vs.Enrile, 160 SCRA 702 (1988)
Tan v. Barrios. October 18, 1990
Right to Speedy Trial
Que vs. Cosico, 177 SCRA 410 (1989)
 14

Caes vs. IAC, 179 SCRA 54 (1989)

Administrative & Criminal Proceedings
Icasiano vs. Sandignabayan, 209 SCRA 377(1992)
Vincoy v. CA, G.R. No. 156558, June 14, 2004
People v. Larannaga, G.R. No. 138874, July 21, 2005
Plea of Guilt to Lesser Offense
People vs. Judge Villarama, 210 SCRA 246 (1992)

NEW or Important CASE People v Quijada, 259 SCRA 191

_________________________________________________________________

XVII. PRIVILEGE OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Art. II, Sec. 15

Art. VII, Sec, 18
Villavicencio vs. Lukban, 39 Phil 778 (1919)
Moncupa vs. Ponce Enrile, 141 SCRA 223 (1986)
Lansang vs. Garcia, 42 SCRA 448 (1971)
Chavez vs. Court of Appeals, 24 SCRA 663 (1968)
Gumabon vs. Director of Prisons, 37 SCRA 420 (1971)
In re Abadilla, 156 SCRA 92 (1987)
Norberto Feria vs. CA, et al. G.R. 122954 Feb 15, 2000
Illusorio v. Bildner, G.R. 139789, May 12, 2000

Writ of Amparo and Habeas Data

Marynetter Gamboa v P/SSPT Marlou C. Chan et al, 24 July 2012
In the matter of the Petition for the issuance of a Writ of Amparo in favor of
Lilibeth Kadaga, GR 189689, Nov 13, 2012
_____________________________________________________________________

XVIII. FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

Art. III, Sec. 4

Id., Sec. 18 (1)
Purpose
United States vs. Bustos, 37 Phil. 731 (1918)
Burgos vs. Chief Of Staff, 133 SCRA 800 (1984)
New York Times vs. Sullivan 380 US 51 (1964)
Restrictions
Gonzales vs. COMELEC, 27 SCRA 835 (1969)
Social Weather Station v. Comelec, G.R. 147571, May 5, 2001
Balancing of Interest Test
Dangerous Tendency Test
Clear and Present Danger Test
Zaldivar vs. Sandiganbayan, 170 SCRA 1 (1989)
Sanidad vs. COMELEC, G.R. 90878, January 29, 1990
Reno v. ACLU, D-96-511 June 26, 1997
Miriam College v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 127930 December 15, 2000
ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp. v. Comelec, G.R. No. 133486, January 28, 2000
Chavez v. Comelec
Disini Jr. sec of Jutice Feb 11, 2014

Freedom of Expression, Libel and National Security

Babst vs. NIB, 132 SCRA 316 (1984)
Espuelas vs. People, 90 Phil. 524 (1951)
Elizalde vs. CFI 116 SCRA 93 (1982)
Lopez vs. Court of Appeals, 34 SCRA 116 (1970)
PJI v. Thoenen, G.R. No. 143372, December 13, 2005
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989)
Borjal v. C.A., 301 SCRA 1(1999)
Baguio Midland Courier v. CA, G.R. No. 107566, November 25, 2004
Freedom of Expression and the Administration of Justice
 15

Cabansag vs. Fernandez, 102 Phil. 152

People vs. Alarcon, 69 Phil. 265 (1939)
In Re Ramon Tulfo, AM 90-4-1545-0, April 17, 1990
Nestle Phils. vs. Sanchez, 154 SCRA 542 (1987)
In Re Atty. Emil Jurado AM 90-5-2373 July 12, 1990
Freedom of Expression, Movie Censorship, Obscenity and the Right to Privacy
Gonzales vs. Kalaw Katikbak, 137 SCRA 356 (1985)
Lagunzad vs. Sotto, Vda. De Gonzales 92 SCRA 476 (1979)
Ayer Productions vs. Judge Capulong, 160 SCRA 861 (1988)
KMU v. Director General, G.R. No. 167798, April 19, 2006
MTRCB v. ABS-CBN, G.R. No. 155282, January 17, 2005
Reno v. ACLU, June 26, 1997, D-96-511
Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)
Fernando v. Court of Appeals. G.R. No. 159751 December 6, 2006
Radio Broadcasts
Eastern Broadcasting Corp. (DYRE) vs. Dans, 137 SCRA 247 (1985)

NEW CASES Francisco v Chavez, GR 169838 April 25, 2006

Osmena v Comelec, 268 SCRA447
Social Weather Stations, Inc v Comelec, May 5, 2001
Disini Jr. Sec of Justice, Feb 11, 2014
Hing v Choachuy, GR 179736 June 26, 2013
______ ________________________________________________________________

XIX. FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY

BP Blg. 880 (Public Assembly Act of 1985)

Primicias vs. Fugoso, 80 Phil. 71 (1948)
Navarro vs. Villegas, 31 SCRA 730 (1970)
Ignacio vs. Ela, 99 Phil. 346 (1956)
J.B.I. Reyes vs. Bagatsing , 125 SCRA 553 (1983)
Ruiz vs. Gordon, 126 SCRA 233 (1983)
Malabanan vs. Ramento, 129 SCRA 359 (1984)
Arreza vs. GAUF, 137 SCRA 94 (1985)
German vs. Barangan, 135 SCRA 514 (1985)
Acosta v CA and CSC GR 132088 Jun 28, 2000
Bayan v. Ermita, G.R. No. 169848, April 25, 2006
______________________________________________________________

XX. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

Art. III, Sec. 7

Baldoza vs. Dimaano, 71 SCRA 14 (1976)
Tanada vs. Tuvera, supra
Valmonte vs. Belmonte, 170 SCRA 256 (1989)
Legaspi vs. CSC, 150 SCRA 530 (1987)
Garcia vs. BOI, 177 SCRA 374 (1989)
Request for Copy of 2008 SALN and Personal Data Shee or CV of Justices of Supreme
Court and Officers and Employees of the Judiciary, June 13, 2012
Chaves v PCGG, 299 SCRA 744
_______________________________________________________________

XXI. FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION

Art. III, Sec. 8

Art. IX, Sec. 2 (5)
Art. XIII, Sec. 3, par.2
Occena vs. COMELEC, 127 SCRA 404 (1985)
In re Edillon, 84 SCRA (1979)
Rotary Intl v. Rotary Club, 481 U.S. 537 (1987)

_______________________________________________________________
 16

XXII. FREEDOM OF RELIGION

Art. III, Sec. 5

NonEstablishment Clause
Operation of Secretarian schools
Art. XIV, Sec. 4(2)
Religions instruction in Public schools
Art. XIVSec. 3(3)
Civil Code, Art. 359(1)
Anti- evolution laws
Epperson vs. Arkansas, 33 U. S. 27 (1968)

Prayer and Bible reading in public schools

Engel vs. Vitale, 370 U. S. 421 (1962)
Abington Schools Dist. vs. Schempp, 374 U. S. 203 (1973)
Stone v. Graham, 449 U.S. 39 (1980)
Tax exemption
Art. VI, Sec. 28 (3)
Public aid to religion
Art. VI, Sec. 29 (2)
Aglipay vs. Ruiz, 64 Phil. 201 (1937)
Mueller v. Allen, 463 U.S. 388 (1983)
Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 [1971]
Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 [1985]).
Islamic Dawah Counsil v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 153888, July 9, 2003
Intramural religious disputes
Fonacier vs. CA, 96 Phil. 417 (1955)
Free Exercise Clause
Estrada v. Escritor, A.M. No. P-02-1651. June 22, 2006
Flag salute
West Va Board of Education vs. Barnette, 319 U. S. 624 (1943)
Ebralinag v. Division Superintendent (March 1, 1993)
Freedom to propagate religious doctrines
American Bible Society vs. City of Manila , 181 Phil. 386 (1957)
Swaggart Ministries v. Cal Bd. Of Equalization, 493 U.S. 378 (1990)
Exemption from Union shop
Victoriano vs. Elizalde Rope Workers Union , 59 SCRA 54 (1974)
Disqualification for local government officials
Pamil vs. Teleron , 86 SCRA 413 (1978)
Religious Test
Torcaso vs. Watkins 367 U.S. 488 (1961)

____________________________________________________________

XIII. LIBERTY OF ABODE AND TRAVEL

Art. III, Sec. 6

Salonga vs. Hermosa, 97 SCRA 121 (1989)
Caunca vs. Salazar, 82 Phil. 851 (1940)
Manotok vs. CA. 142 SCRA 149 (1986)
Marcos vs. Manglapus, 177 SCRA 668 (1989)
Silverio vs. CA, G.R. no. 94284 April 8, 1991
Lorenzo v. Director of Health, 50 Phil 595

New Cases Office of the Admin Services Office of the Court Administrator v Judge
Macarine, 18 July 2012
Request for Copy of 2008 SALN and Personal Data Shee or CV of Justices of
Supreme Court and Officers and Employees of the Judiciary, June 13, 2012

Readings
 17

1. Is There Religious Apartheid in the Public Service?*

By Chief Justice Reynato S. Puno Supreme Court

2. WHEN SHOULD MIRANDA WARNINGS BE ADMINISTERED? Pacifico Agabin

3. PRIMER ON THE WRIT OF HABEAS DATA By Atty. Neri Javier Colmenares

Nothing follows