Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
(Bi nghe gm c hai phn, mi phn c nghe hai ln, mi ln cch nhau bng tn hiu nhc. M u v
kt thc bi nghe cng c tn hiu nhc)
I.You will hear Sarah Brown talking about her work as a television weather forecaster.
For each question put a tick ()in the correct box. (2ms)
4 - Sarah's husband
B) a photo of Sarah.
For each question, fill in the missing information in the text boxes given.
ATHLETICS CHAMPIONSHIPS
5. birinfo 6. Friday
I.Choose the word whose underlined part is pronounced deifferently from the rest. (0.5m)
II.Pick out the word whose main stress is different from the rest. (0.5m)
I.Choose the most suitable word or phrase to complete each sentence. (2ms)
2. Would you mind putting the parcel in the post for me?
..
C.thoroughly know their subjects are D.their subjects are thoroughly known
4.When I opened the envelope, I was delighted to find a cheque $500. (with)
5.We will have to organize a union meeting if we want to head .. a strike.
1.Mrs. mary, who teaches us English, usually stresses the need for regular .. (attend)
attendence
3. This is not a good essay, said the lecturer. I find your arguments (convince)
convincing
4.The water from the stream should be . before you drink it. (pure) purified
I.Read the following passage and then choose the most suitable word for each space. (1m)
Music is clearly different from language. People can, nevertheless, use it to communicate things
especially their emotions and when allied with speech in a song, it is one of the most powerful (1)
. of communication that humans have. But what, biologically speaking, is it? If music is truly
disticnt from speech, then it ought to have a distinct processing mechanism in the brain one that keeps it
separate from the interpretation of other sounds, including language. The evidence suggests that such a
separate mechanism does, indeed, exist.
Scientific curiosity about the auditory system dates back to the mid-19th century. In 1861 Paul Broca, a
French surgeon, observed that speech was (3) due to damage to a particular part of the brain, now
known as Brocas area. In 1874 Carl Wernicke, a German neurologist, made a similar observation about
another brain area and was similarly immortalised. The location of different language- (4) .
tasks in Brocas areas (found in the brains left temporal lobe, above the ear) was one of the first pieces of (5)
. that different bits of the brain are specilized to do different jobs.
1.A.mode B.way C.method D.means
Man and most animals need a constant supply of water to live. Farmers water for their crops.
Hydroelectric dams hold back needed water and provide power for homes and industries.
Trees and grass, and other plant life play an important part in the natural circulation of water, thus
help conserve it. Without plants most water would run as soon as it falls, taking away valuable soil. Rapid
runoff would cause frequent floods, and leave little water during dry seasons.
Nature has many ways of conserving and controlling water. But man often upsets the water balance in
his desire to grow more crops. He drains ponds, swamps and wet land. He ploughs under the natural soil,
cuts timber, and dredges and straightens streams. These changes reduce natural storage of water and speed
runoff.
Water can be held on the land by plating vegetation. Forests and grass should be planted where there
are no natural growths. Dams built across rivers help hold back the water. Reservoirs behind the dams store
water during wet season use in dry seasons. Dams help prevent floods by controlling the flow of water.
Note: to dredge = to make a river deeper
1. What is the topic of the passage?
A. Water circulation B. Water conservation C. Controlling water D. Use of water
2. What is the consequence of having no plants on land?
A. no water B. frequent floods C dry crops D. valuable soil
3. Which is one of the ways that men do to affect the water balance?
A. shortening streams B. cutting down trees
C. preserving water D. protecting ponds and swamps
4. What is NOT a natural way of conserving and controlling water?
A. ponds B. streams C. swamps D. reservoirs
5. What do people use reservoirs for?
A. growing plants B. building dams C. storing water D. preventing floods
III.Find out the mistakes and correct them. (1m)
The passage below contains 05 mistakes. Find out the mistakes and write the correct words in the
numbered blank. (1) has been done as an example.
Birds that feed on flock commonly retire together into roosts. The reasons for roosting commune are not
always obvious. but there are some likely benefit. In winter especially. it is important for birds to keep
warmth at night and conserve precious food reserves. One way to do this is to find a sheltered roost. Solitary
roosters shelter in dense vegetation or enter a cavity - horned larks dig holes in the ground and ptarmigan
burrow into snow banks - but the effect of sheltering is magnified by several birds huddling together in the
roosts, as wrens, swifts. brown creepers, bluebirds. and anis do. Body contact reduces the surface area
exposed to the cold air, so the birds keep each other warm. Two kinglets huddling together was found to
reduce their heat losses by a quarter, and three together saved a third of their heat.
Mistakes Correction
1.commune communally
2.on flock in flocks
3.benifit benifits
4.warmth warm
5.was were
IV.Fill in each blank with one suitable word. (1m)
DANGERS OF TECHNOLOGY
Much has been heard recently about possible health hazards, including memory loss and brain (1)
tumours.., from the use of mobile phones. With the possible half a billion mobile phones in use throughout
the world, in Britain today, one person in four owns one, which is worrying enough, even if, so far, no
concrete (2) evidence has come to light. One study by Dr. Alan Preece and his team at Bristol
University has shown, however, in a report in the International Journal of Radiation Biology, that tests on
volunteers (3) demonstrated no effect on their short-term memory or attention span. Subjects
were exposed to microwave radiation for up to thirty minutes, but the one noticeable effect was positive (4)
rather than negative; the subject reacted more rapidly in one test with a visual choice. One
explanation of this is that following the transmissions, a warming of the blood led to increased (5)
..blood-flow.. For the experiment, places were chosen where the signal was good and the
microwave dose light, and then where the signal was poor and the dose much higher. The subjects were
tested for recall and mental alertness after exposure to microwaves characteristic of analogue phones, digital
phones or no phones at all, without knowing what they were exposed to. It is, of course, early days yet and
the sample may not be larged enough to generalise from. More research needs to be done.
Notes:
1. tumour/'tju:m/: khi u, u, bu
malignant tumor: u c tnh
2.evidence/'evidns/:bng chng
3. demonstrate/'demnstreit/: chng minh, gii thch
4.blood-flow:lu lng mu
5. subject: i tng
I.Complete each of the following sentences in such a way that means the same as the sentence printed
before it. (1m)
2.Many people were very surprised that the poor farmer had a lot of money when he died.
The poor farmer surprised many people with a large amount of his money when he died.
1.She was going to hand in her notice when the boss decided to promote her. (point)
She was on the point of handing in her notice when the boss decided to promote her.
Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what
extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Sample 1:
There are some historical organisations who hold the view that foreigners should pay more to visit their
ancient sites than locals do. I am opposed to this because I believe it is unfair and can create certain
drawbacks. My reasoning for this is as follows.
Firstly, the higher charges will increase the budgets of foreign tourists wishing to visit the country. If
you take the example of a family of four for instance; their costs will be even higher, and yet local families
still pay local prices. Not only does this discriminatory pricing affect the budget of the traveller, it can also
make them feel disheartened and unwelcome here.
There is of course some apparent wisdom to the reasoning behind the historical organisations that have
made these decisions. The higher costs and resulting increased profits will improve the quality and type of
tourists who visit here, while also enhancing their experience through improved conditions such as better
facilities and security. The increased profits will also be of benefit to local people, and confirm that it is their
privilege to have affordable access to the heritage that their ancestors left for them.
However, with the growing trend of globalization now overwhelming, travelling abroad has become
very popular andeasy to do. And with this in mind it is my strong view that international travellers should be
treated as equally as possible. There will then be more likelihood of a state of harmony existing between all
of us.
Sample 2:
It is sometimes argued that tourists from overseas should be charged more than local residents to visit
important sites and monuments. I completely disagree with this idea.
The argument in favour of higher prices for foreign tourists would be that cultural or historical
attractions often depend on state subsidies to keep them going, which means that the resident population
already pays money to these sites through the tax system. However, I believe this to be a very shortsighted
view. Foreign tourists contribute to the economy of the host country with the money they spend on a wide
range of goods and services, including food, souvenirs, accommodation and travel. The governments and
inhabitants of every country should be happy to subsidise important tourist sites and encourage people from
the rest of the world to visit them.
If travellers realised that they would have to pay more to visit historical and cultural attractions in a
particular nation, they would perhaps decide not to go to that country on holiday. To take the UK as an
example, the tourism industry and many related jobs rely on visitors coming to the country to see places like
Windsor Castle or Saint Pauls Cathedral. These two sites charge the same price regardless of nationality, and
this helps to promote the nations cultural heritage. If overseas tourists stopped coming due to higher prices,
there would be a risk of insufficient funding for the maintenance of these important buildings.
In conclusion, I believe that every effort should be made to attract tourists from overseas, and it would
be counterproductive to make them pay more than local residents.