Sie sind auf Seite 1von 41

Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.

1 Page 1 of 41

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

STEELCASE, INC.,

Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

v. Judge:

HASKELL OFFICE LLC JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendant.

COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Steelcase, Inc. (Steelcase) alleges the following claims against Defendant

Haskell Office LLC (Haskell):

THE PARTIES

1. Steelcase is a Michigan corporation, having a principal place of business at 901

44th Street, S.E., Grand Rapids, Michigan 49508.

2. Upon information and belief, Haskell is a Pennsylvania Corporation, having a

principal place of business at 298 Levering Mill Rd # 2, Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 19004.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

3. This is a civil action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the

United States, 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

1331 and 1338(a).

4. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Haskell because Haskell is doing

business and has committed one or more infringing acts complained of herein within this State

and Judicial District. More specifically, upon information and belief, Haskell has sold, offered

for sale, distributed to and/or shipped the accused infringing products into this Judicial District.
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.2 Page 2 of 41

In addition, upon information and belief, Haskell has knowingly and intentionally placed

products into the stream of commerce through established distribution channels expecting them

to be shipped into and purchased by customers in this Judicial District.

5. Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. 1391 (b) and/or (c) and

1400(b). Upon information and belief, Haskell conducts business in this Judicial District, and

wrongful acts of patent infringement by Haskell have taken place and are continuing to take

place in this Judicial District.

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

STEELCASES LEGACY OF INNOVATION

6. Steelcase is a company founded over 100 years ago in 1912 as the Metal Office

Furniture Company in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Steelcase now is a global, industry-leading

manufacturer of office furniture and office space solutions.

7. Steelcases innovations have resulted in a comprehensive portfolio of products,

furnishings and servicessolutions addressing: interior architecture, furniture and technology

for use in the workplace, healthcare and education spaces.

8. Among Steelcases current product offerings is its Node chair (the Node

Chair). The Node Chair is considered to be a pioneer in collaborative learning furniture.

9. Also among Steelcases current product offerings is its Verb series of product

which include classroom table and desk solutions designed to support different learning modes

that integrate whiteboards, easels, and storage that facilitate effective display and presentation in

the classroom setting.

-2-
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.3 Page 3 of 41

10. Steelcase currently owns several patents on innovations in the educational

furniture industry, including several patents asserted herein covering Steelcases Node Chair and

Verb series of products.

THE ASSERTED PATENTS

11. Steelcase is the assignee and owner of all right, title and interest in and to U.S.

Patent No. 9,060,609 which was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on

June 23, 2015 and is entitled Seat Assembly (the 609 patent). A true and accurate copy of

the 609 patent is attached as Exhibit 1.

12. Steelcase is the assignee and owner of all right, title and interest in and to U.S.

Patent No. 9,414,686 which was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on

August 16, 2016 and is entitled Seat Assembly (the 686 patent). A true and accurate copy

of the 686 patent is attached as Exhibit 2.

13. Steelcase is the assignee and owner of all right, title and interest in and to U.S.

Patent No. 9,044,087 which was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on

June 2, 2015 and is entitled Seat Assembly (the 087 patent). A true and accurate copy of

the 087 patent is attached as Exhibit 3.

14. Steelcase is the assignee and owner of all right, title and interest in and to U.S.

Patent No. 9,277,825 which was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on

March 8, 2016 and is entitled Node Seat to Base Mounting Assembly (the 825 patent). A

true and accurate copy of the 825 patent is attached as Exhibit 4.

15. Steelcase is the assignee and owner of all right, title and interest in and to U.S.

Patent No. 9,414,685 which was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on

August 16, 2016 and is entitled Node Seat to Base Mounting Assembly (the 685 patent). A

true and accurate copy of the 685 patent is attached as Exhibit 5.

-3-
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.4 Page 4 of 41

16. Steelcase is the assignee and owner of all right, title and interest in and to U.S.

Design Patent No. D679,923 which was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office

on April 16, 2013 and is entitled Base for Seating Unit (the 923 patent). A true and

accurate copy of the 923 patent is attached as Exhibit 6.

17. Steelcase is the assignee and owner of all right, title and interest in and to U.S.

Patent No. 9,226,578 which was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on

January 5, 2016 and is entitled Learning Suite Furniture System (the 578 patent). A true

and accurate copy of the 578 patent is attached as Exhibit 7.

18. Steelcase is the assignee and owner of all right, title and interest in and to U.S.

Patent No. 9,066,589 which was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on

June 30, 2015 and is entitled Learning Suite Furniture System (the 589 patent). A true and

accurate copy of the 589 patent is attached as Exhibit 8.

19. The 609 patent, the 686 patent, the 087 patent, the 825 patent, the 685 patent,

the 923 patent, the 578 patent, and the 589 patent are collectively referred to herein as the

Steelcase Patents.

20. Steelcase is the owner of all right, title and interest in and to the Steelcase Patents.

21. The Steelcase Patents are valid and enforceable under the United States Patent

Laws.

22. Steelcase has complied with the statutory notice provisions of 35 U.S.C. 287

with respect to each of the Steelcase Patents.

HASKELLS INFRINGING ACTS

23. Haskell designs and manufactures furniture for use in business, education,

government and institutional enterprises.

-4-
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.5 Page 5 of 41

24. Haskell sells seating solutions it markets under its Ethos brand, including its

Ethos Chair Series (Ethos Chair). A true and correct copy of literature describing the Ethos

Chair is publicly available at http://www.haskelloffice.com/resources/PDFs/Literature_Ethos.pdf

and attached as Exhibit 9.

FIG. A FIG. B FIG. C

25. The Ethos Chair is marketed as a seating solution that serves as a teaching

assistant which simplifies a Think-Pair-Share lesson plan. Exhibit 9. Haskell describes its

Ethos Chair as more than a chair because it is a contemporary design chair that has

swiveling capability, mobility, and personal storage. Id. The Ethos Chair sells in a

variety of colors or finishes for, what Haskell calls, the 21st century classroom. Id.

26. ConfigurableClassroom.com is a website that posts articles and opinions of

industry experts specializing in educational resources for the 21st Century Learning

-5-
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.6 Page 6 of 41

Environments. Its mission is to assist educators by providing real world insights to aid in the

process of creating the most effective student-centered, configurable classrooms. See

http://configurableclassroom.com/about-us/

27. In October 2014, ConfigurableClassroom.com posted a review of the Haskell

Ethos chairs, stating with respect to the Haskell Ethos collection line that it is obvious they are

taking on the Steelcase Node. The October 2014 post further highlights the [a]ttractive

design of the Haskell Ethos chair and states, [t]he design does look similar to the Steelcase

Node. A true and correct copy of the October 2014 post from ConfigurableClassroom.com is

available at http://configurableclassroom.com/21st-century-classroom-seating-haskell-ethos/ and

attached hereto as Exhibit 10.

28. Haskell also sells tables and desks it markets under its Echo Series brand (herein

after referred to as Echo Series or the Echo Series products). A true and correct copy of

literature describing the Echo Series is publicly available at

http://www.haskelloffice.com/resources/PDFs/Literature_ECHO.pdf and attached as Exhibit 11.

29. As pictured in Figure D, the Echo Series products include tables, desks and

display systems, such as whiteboards and easels that are marketed to seamlessly transition the

classroom environment from lectures to group work, private study and discussion. Exhibit 11.

Indeed, Haskell markets its Echo Series products as being beyond the desk in that it

incorporates individual whiteboards and a fully integrated whiteboard system. Id.

-6-
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.7 Page 7 of 41

FIG. D

30. The Echo Series products are available in a variety of colors and, according to

Haskell, are not only essential to the complete classroom but are also companion products to

the Ethos Chairs, as pictured in Figure E, below. See Exhibit 11.

FIG. E

31. The Ethos Chair and the Echo Series products are collectively referred to herein

as the Accused Products.

32. Without Steelcases authorization, Haskell has made, used, sold, offered for sale

in the United States and/or imported into the United States, products, including at least the

Accused Products, covered by one or more claims of each of the Steelcase Patents.

33. On or about October 11, 2013, Steelcase sent Douglas Brown of Haskell Office a

letter advising Haskell that Steelcase is the legal owner of several U.S. Patents, including the

923 patent. In that October 11, 2013 letter, Steelcase warned Haskell that Steelcase believed the

-7-
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.8 Page 8 of 41

Ethos Chair were covered by the 923 patent. A true and accurate copy of the Steelcases

October 11, 2013 letter to Mr. Brown is attached as Exhibit 12.

34. In that October 11, 2013 letter, Steelcase also requested that Haskell immediately

refrain from making using, offering to sell or selling any product incorporating the designs

claimed in the 923 patent.

35. About a year later, on October 10, 2014, Steelcase, by and through its attorneys,

sent Haskells attorney, Mr. Robert F. Zielinski, Esq. correspondence via email and U.S. Mail

putting Haskell on notice of certain published patent applications, including U.S. Patent

Application No. 2014/0210237 A1 (the 237 Application) which published on July 31, 2014.

A true and accurate copy of the 237 Application is attached as Exhibit 13.

36. Steelcases October 10, 2014 correspondence further put Haskell on notice that its

Ethos Chair (or any other chairs having the claimed structures) may be liable for infringement

upon issuance of patents from the 237 Application. A true and accurate copy of the Steelcases

October 10, 2014 letter to Mr. Zielinski is attached as Exhibit 14.

37. Then, on January 13, 2016, Steelcase, by and through its attorneys, sent Haskells

attorney further correspondence, again putting Haskell on notice that its Ethos Chair covered by

one or more claims of certain Steelcase patents, including the 087 patent, the 923 patent and the

609 patent (as well as the published claims of the 237 Application). A true and accurate copy

of the Steelcases January 13, 2016 letter to Mr. Zielinski is attached as Exhibit 15.

38. In that January 13, 2016 letter to Haskell, Steelcase also put Haskell on notice that

its Echo Series products were also covered by one or more claims of certain patents owned by

Steelcase, including the 578 patent and the 589 patent.

-8-
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.9 Page 9 of 41

39. In that January 13, 2016 letter, Steelcase again demanded that Haskell cease and

desist its importation, offering for sale and/or sale of the Ethos Chair. Steelcase also demanded

that Haskell cease and desist its importation, offering for sale and/or sale of the Echo Series

products.

40. Despite the unequivocal notice provided by Steelcase, Haskell continues to

willfully make, have made, sale, offer for sale and/or imported into the United States the

Accused Products without Steelcases authorization knowing the Accused Products to be

covered by at least one claim of each of the Steelcase Patents.

41. Upon information and belief, Haskell has continued knowingly to make, have

made, sell, offer for sale in the United States, and/or import into the United States office and

classroom furniture and seating solutions, including the Ethos Chair, it knows to be covered by at

least one claim of each of the Steelcase Patents.

COUNT I
(PATENT INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 9,060,609)

42. Steelcase incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs and allegations as if fully

set forth herein.

43. Steelcase is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the design covered

by the 609 patent. Steelcase is entitled to enforce the 609 patent and to receive all damages and

the benefits of all other remedies, including injunctive relief, for Haskells infringement.

44. As a complete and first ground for relief, Steelcase hereby charges Haskell with

infringement of the 609 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq.

45. Haskell has at no time been licensed under the 609 patent.

46. On information and belief, Haskell has and continues to directly infringe the 609

patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell in the United States and/or importing into the

-9-
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.10 Page 10 of 41

United States, without authority, office and classroom furniture and seating solutions, including,

but not limited to, the Ethos Chair, that are covered by one or more claims of the 609 patent.

47. For example, Haskell directly infringes at least claim 1 of the 609 patent, which

states:

The invention claimed is:

1. A base assembly for supporting a chair, the chair including a seat and a mounting
assembly mounted to an underside of the seat, the base assembly comprising:

(i) a pan member having a top surface, a bottom surface, an outer edge, a central
portion and a peripheral portion that surrounds the central portion and that is
adjacent the outer edge, the outer edge forming a shape of the pan member, the
top surface concave upward with the peripheral portion at a height above a height
of the central portion, the pan member forming a plurality of openings that are
spaced about the peripheral portion, each opening located at a height above the
bottom surface of the central portion;

(ii) a bottom ring forming a loop having a shape that is substantially similar to the
shape of the pan member and having an undersurface, a plurality of pintle mounts
extending downward from the undersurface of the bottom ring, the bottom ring
mounted to the top surface of the pan member with the bottom ring contacting the
peripheral portion of the pan member and each pintle mount extending through
one of the openings formed in the pan member;

(iii) a central hub forming a substantially flat top surface and forming an opening
in the top surface for receiving a lower portion of the mounting assembly;

(iv) a plurality of leg members that extend upward and inward from spaced apart
locations of the bottom ring to the central hub spaced from and to support the
central hub above the central portion of the pan member; and

(v) a plurality of casters, a separate caster mounted to each of the pintle mounts.

Exhibit 1 (the 609 patent) at col. 9:64-10:29.

48. Specifically, but without limitation, the Ethos Chair has a base assembly for

supporting a chair that includes a seat and a mounting assembly mounted to an underside of the

seat.

- 10 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.11 Page 11 of 41

49. The Ethos Chair base assembly includes a pan member that has a top surface, a

bottom surface, an outer edge, a central portion and a peripheral portion that surrounds the

central portion to form a shape of a pan. See FIGs. C and F (below); see also, Exhibit 9.

FIG. C FIG. F

50. The outer edge of the pan member of the Ethos Chair base assemby forms the

shape of the pan member and has a top surface that is concave upward with a peripheral portion

above the central portion of the pan member. See e.g., FIGs. C and F.

51. The pan member of the Ethos Chair base assembly includes a plurality of

openings spaced about the peripheral portion of the pan member. Each opening is located above

the bottom surface of the central portion of the pan member. See e.g., FIGs. C and F.

52. The Ethos Chair base assembly has a bottom ring that forms a loop having a

shape substantially similar to the shape of the pan member with an undersurface from whence a

plurality of pintle mounts extend downward. See FIGs. F, G and H (below).

- 11 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.12 Page 12 of 41

FIG. G FIG. H

53. The bottom ring of the Ethos Chair base assembly is mounted to the top surface of

the pan member of the Ethos Chair base assembly, the bottom ring contacts the peripheral

portion of the pan member and each pintle mount extends through one of the openings formed in

the pan member. See FIGs. F, G and H.

54. The central hub of the Ethos Chair base assembly forms a substantially flat top

surface and an opening in the top surface for receiving a lower portion of the mounting

assembly. See FIGs. F (above), L and M (below):

FIG. L FIG. M

- 12 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.13 Page 13 of 41

55. Moreover, the Ethos Chair base assembly also has a plurality of leg members that

extend upward and inward from spaced apart locations of the bottom ring to the central hub to

support the central hub above the central portion of the pan member. See FIGs. C and F.

56. The Ethos Chair base assembly also has a plurality of casters mounted to each of

the pintle mounts. See FIGs. C, F, G, and H.

57. Since at least as early as January 2016, Haskell and certain of its officers, agents,

and employees have been aware of the existence of the 609 patent and, despite such knowledge,

Haskell has continued to willfully make, have made, use, sell, offer for sale and/or import the

Ethos Chair into the United States knowing those acts to infringe at least one claim of the 609

patent.

58. Upon information and belief, Haskells acts of infringement have been, and

continue to be, undertaken with knowledge of the 609 patent. Such acts constitute willful

infringement and make this case exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and 285, and entitle

Steelcase to enhanced damages and reasonable attorney fees.

59. On information and belief, Haskell has also indirectly infringed the 609 patent by

way of inducing infringement of one or more claims of the 609 patent by its customers,

including, but not limited, to Haskells dealers, distributors, re-sellers, and direct end-customers

to use, sell, offer for sale and/or import the Ethos Chair into the United States knowing it

infringes one or more claims of the 609 patent.

60. On information and belief, Haskell has engaged in such actions with the specific

intent to cause infringement or with willful blindness to the resulting infringement of the 609

patent because Haskell had actual knowledge of the 609 patent and knowledge that its acts were

inducing infringement of the 609 patent.

- 13 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.14 Page 14 of 41

61. Steelcase has been and continues to be injured and damaged by Haskells

infringement of the 609 patent in an amount to be determined at trial.

62. Haskells infringement has also caused irreparable harm to Steelcase for which

Steelcase has no adequate remedies at law and Steelcase will continue to suffer such irreparable

harm unless and until Haskells infringement is permanently enjoined by this Court.

COUNT II
(PATENT INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 9,414,686)

63. Steelcase incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs and allegations as if fully

set forth herein.

64. Steelcase is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the design covered

by the 686 patent. Steelcase is entitled to enforce the 686 patent and to receive all damages and

the benefits of all other remedies, including injunctive relief, for Haskells infringement.

65. As a complete and first ground for relief, Steelcase hereby charges Haskell with

infringement of the 686 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq.

66. Haskell has at no time been licensed under the 686 patent.

67. On information and belief, Haskell has and continues to directly infringe the 686

patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell in the United States and/or importing into the

United States, without authority, office and classroom furniture and seating solutions, including,

but not limited to, the Ethos Chair, that are covered by one or more claims of the 686 patent.

68. For example, Haskell infringes at least claim 1 of the 686 patent, which states:

The invention claimed is:

1. A seating assembly comprising:

a seating structure including a seat member having an undersurface and a seat


edge;

a mounting bracket mounted to the undersurface of the seat member;

- 14 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.15 Page 15 of 41

a base including a central hub and plurality of leg members extending downward
from the central hub to lower leg ends, the mounting bracket mounted to the base
spaced above the central hub, a first vertical axis passing through the central hub;

a base tube mounted to and extending upward along the first vertical axis from the
central hub;

a mounting collar mounted to the base tube for rotation about the first vertical
axis, the mounting collar positioned proximate and below the mounting bracket
and located at the least in part between the mounting bracket and the central hub;

a support arm having first and second ends, the first end mounted to the mounting
collar for rotation therewith about the vertical axis, the support arm extending
radially outward from the mounting collar along the under-surface of the seat
member and upward to the second end;

a tablet member having a top surface, the tablet member mounted to the second
end of the support arm with the top surface substantially horizontal; and

at least one storage pan mounted to at least first and second of the plurality of leg
members, an upward facing surface of the storage pan providing a support surface
for storing items.

Exhibit 2 (686 patent) at 10:1-38.

69. Specifically, but without limitation, the Ethos Chair is a seating assembly that

includes a seat structure, a mounting bracket, a base, a base tube, a mounting collar, a support

arm, a tablet member, and at least one storage pan. See FIGs. B and C.

70. The Ethos Chair has a seat structure that includes a seat member having an

undersurface and a seat edge, as well as a mounting bracket mounted to the undersurface of the

seat member. See e.g., FIGs. B, C, and L.

71. The Ethos Chair has a base that includes a central hub and a plurality of legs

extending downward from the central hub to the lower leg ends. See e.g., FIGs. C and F.

72. The mounting bracket of the Ethos Chair is mounted to the base that is spaced

above the central hub of the Ethos Chair, which has a vertical axis passing through it. See e.g.,

FIGs. F and L.

- 15 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.16 Page 16 of 41

73. The Ethos Chair also includes a base tube mounted to and extending upward

along the vertical axis from the central hub. See e.g., FIGs. F, L, and M.

74. The Ethos Chair also includes a mounting collar mounted to the base tube for

rotation about the vertical axis, where the mounting collar is positioned proximate and below the

mounting bracket. The mounting collar is located at least in part between the mounting bracket

and the central hub of the Ethos Chair. See e.g., FIGs. F, L, and M.

75. The Ethos Chair includes a support arm with a first and second end. The first end

of the support arm is mounted to the mounting collar for rotation about the vertical axis. The

support arm of the Ethos Chair extends radially outward from the mounting collar along the

undersurface of the seat member of the Ethos Chair. The support arm of the Ethos Chair seating

assembly also extends upward to the second end upon which a tablet member is mounted with

the top surface of the table member is substantially horizontal. See e.g., FIGs. B, C (above) and

N (pictured below):

FIG. N

76. The Ethos Chair also includes at least one storage pan that is mounted to at least

first and second of the plurality of leg members and is upward facing to provide a support

surface for storing items. See e.g., FIGs. C and F.

- 16 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.17 Page 17 of 41

77. Upon information and belief, Haskells acts of infringement have been, and

continues to be, undertaken with knowledge of the 686 patent and knowing those acts infringe at

least one claim of the 686 patent. Such acts constitute willful infringement and make this case

exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and 285, and entitle Steelcase to enhanced damages

and reasonable attorney fees.

78. On information and belief, Haskell has also indirectly infringed the 686 patent by

way of inducing infringement of one or more claims of the 686 patent by its customers,

including, but not limited, to Haskells dealers, distributors, re-sellers, and direct end-customers

to use, sell, offer for sale and/or import the Ethos Chair into the United States knowing it

infringes one or more claims of the 686 patent.

79. On information and belief, Haskell has engaged in such actions with the specific

intent to cause infringement or with willful blindness to the resulting infringement of the 686

patent because Haskell had actual knowledge of the 686 patent and knowledge that its acts were

inducing infringement of the 686 patent.

80. Steelcase has been and continues to be injured and damaged by Haskells

infringement of the 686 patent in an amount to be determined at trial.

81. Haskells infringement has also caused irreparable harm to Steelcase for which

Steelcase has no adequate remedies at law and Steelcase will continue to suffer such irreparable

harm unless and until Haskells infringement is permanently enjoined by this Court.

COUNT III
(PATENT INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO 9,044,087)

82. Steelcase incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs and allegations as if fully

set forth herein.

- 17 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.18 Page 18 of 41

83. Steelcase is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the design covered

by the 087 patent. Steelcase is entitled to enforce the 087 patent and to receive all damages and

the benefits of all other remedies, including injunctive relief, for Haskells infringement.

84. As a complete and first ground for relief, Steelcase hereby charges Haskell with

infringement of the 087 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq.

85. Haskell has at no time been licensed under the 087 patent.

86. On information and belief, Haskell has and continues to directly infringe the 087

patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell in the United States and/or importing into the

United States, without authority, office and classroom furniture and seating solutions, including,

but not limited to, the Ethos Chair, that are covered by one or more claims of the 087 patent.

87. For example, Haskell infringes at least claim 1 of the 087 patent, which states:

The invention claimed is:

1. a seating assembly comprising:

a base comprising:

a plurality of casters;

a bottom ring supported by the casters;

a pan supported by the bottom ring and adapted to support articles above the floor
surface;

a central hub forming an upwardly opening cavity;

a plurality of legs extending outward and downward from the central hub to the
bottom ring and wherein the locations at which the legs connect to the bottom ring
are offset from the positions of the casters;

a one-piece molded seat shell comprising:

a seat member having an undersurface and four protrusions molded into and
extending downward from the undersurface of the seat member, each protrusion
adapted to receive a fastener;

a backrest; and

- 18 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.19 Page 19 of 41

first and second armrests;

a mounting bracket forming four apertures and including a female connector and
at least one rib member that extends downward adjacent the female connector, the
at least one rib member including end edges that forms first and second stop
surfaces, the mounting bracket attached to the bottom on the seat by passing
fasteners through the apertures and into the protrusions;

a support arm having first and second ends;

a mounting assembly including:

a cup member received in the upwardly opening cavity formed by the central hub,
the cup member forming an upwardly opening cavity;

a base tube having upper and lower ends, the lower end received in the upwardly
opening cavity formed by the cup member and the upper end engaging the female
connector;

a annular mounting collar supported by the cup member for rotation about a
substantially vertical axis, the support arm connected to the mounting collar and
extending to one side of an external surface of the mounting collar; and

a pivot cover forming an upwardly opening annular channel and an inverted U-


shaped opening, the pivot cover attached to the mounting collar with the first end
of the support arm extending through the inverted U-shaped opening and the at
least one rib member received within the annular channel; and

a tablet supported at the second end of the support arm.

Exhibit 3 (the 087 patent) at 9:62-10:44.

88. Specifically, but without limitation, the Ethos Chair is a seating assembly that

includes a base, a pan adapted to support articles above the floor and is supported by a bottom

ring, which is supported by a plurality of casters. See e.g., FIGs. C, F, and G.

89. The Ethos Chair also has a central hub that forms an upwardly opening cavity

with a plurality of legs extending outward and downward from the central hub to the bottom

ring. The plurality of legs are connected to the bottom ring but the locations at which the legs

connect are offset from the positions of the casters. See e.g., FIGs. F, G, and H.

- 19 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.20 Page 20 of 41

90. The Ethos Chair includes a seat member, which is a one-piece molded seat shell

with an undersurface, a backrest and two armrests. The seat member also has four protrusions

which are molded into and extending downward from the undersurface and adapted to receive a

fastener. See e.g., I, J and K (below):

FIG. I FIG. J FIG. K

91. The Ethos Chair includes a support arm having first and second ends. See e.g.,

FIGs. B, C and N.

92. The Ethos Chair also includes a mounting bracket that forms four apertures, a

female connector and at least one rib member that extends downward adjacent the female

connector. The mounting bracket is attached to the bottom of the seat by passing fasteners

through the apertures and into the protrusions. The rib member includes end edges that forms

first and second stop surfaces. See e.g., FIGs. F, K, and M (below):

FIG. F FIG. K FIG. M

- 20 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.21 Page 21 of 41

93. The Ethos Chair has a mounting assembly that includes a cup member which

forms an upwardly opening cavity formed by the central hub, a base tube where the lower end of

the tube is received in the upwardly opening cavity of the cup member and the upper end of the

tube is received by the female connector. The cup member supports an annular mounting collar

for rotation about a substantially vertical axis. The mounting collar is attached to a pivot cover

that forms an upwardly opening annular channel and an inverted U-shaped opening. See e.g.,

FIGs. F, K, and M.

94. Finally, the Ethos Chair has a tablet supported at the end of the support arm. See

e.g., FIGs. B, C and N.

95. Upon information and belief, Haskells acts of infringement have been, and

continues to be, undertaken with knowledge of the 087 patent and knowing those acts infringe at

least one claim of the 087 patent. Such acts constitute willful infringement and make this case

exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and 285, and entitle Steelcase to enhanced damages

and reasonable attorney fees.

96. On information and belief, Haskell has also indirectly infringed the 087 patent by

way of inducing infringement of one or more claims of the 087 patent by its customers,

including, but not limited, to Haskells dealers, distributors, re-sellers, and direct end-customers

to use, sell, offer for sale and/or import the Ethos Chair into the United States knowing it

infringes one or more claims of the 087 patent.

97. On information and belief, Haskell has engaged in such actions with the specific

intent to cause infringement or with willful blindness to the resulting infringement of the 087

patent because Haskell had actual knowledge of the 087 patent and knowledge that its acts were

inducing infringement of the 087 patent.

- 21 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.22 Page 22 of 41

98. Steelcase has been and continues to be injured and damaged by Haskells

infringement of the 087 patent in an amount to be determined at trial.

99. Haskells infringement has also caused irreparable harm to Steelcase for which

Steelcase has no adequate remedies at law and Steelcase will continue to suffer such irreparable

harm unless and until Haskells infringement is permanently enjoined by this Court

COUNT IV
(PATENT INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO 9,277,825)

100. Steelcase incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs and allegations as if fully

set forth herein.

101. Steelcase is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the design covered

by the 825 patent. Steelcase is entitled to enforce the 825 patent and to receive all damages and

the benefits of all other remedies, including injunctive relief, for Haskells infringement.

102. As a complete and first ground for relief, Steelcase hereby charges Haskell with

infringement of the 825 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq.

103. Haskell has at no time been licensed under the 825 patent.

104. On information and belief, Haskell has and continues to directly infringe the 825

patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell in the United States and/or importing into the

United States, without authority, office and classroom furniture and seating solutions, including,

but not limited to, the Ethos Chair, that are covered by one or more claims of the 825 patent.

105. For example, Haskell infringes at least claim 1 of the 825 patent, which states:

The invention claimed is:

1. A seating unit for use in a space including a supporting floor surface, the
seating unit comprising:

a seat structure comprising a mounting bracket having a female connector;

- 22 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.23 Page 23 of 41

a tablet assembly comprising a support arm having a mounting collar on an end;


and

a base having a lower end to be supported by the floor surface and including a
base mounting assembly; and

wherein the base mounting assembly comprises a cup attached to the base, a base
tube having a first end inserted into the cup and a second end extending through
the mounting collar and mateably engaging the female connector; and

wherein the tablet assembly further comprises a bushing inserted into a bottom of
the mounting collar and a pivot cover nested over a top of the mounting collar and
the end of the support arm.

Exhibit 4 (the 825 patent) at 9:63-10:13.

106. Specifically, but without limitation, the Ethos Chair is a seating unit with a

supporting floor surface. The Ethos Chair has a seat structure that includes a mounting bracket

with a connector, a tablet assembly with a support arm and a mounting collar, and a base. See

e.g., FIGs. A-C, F, and M.

107. The base of the Ethos Chair has a lower end supported by the floor surface and

includes a base mounting assembly. See e.g., FIG. F.

108. The base mounting assembly of the Ethos Chair has a cup attached to the base

with one end of a base tube inserted into the cup while the other end extends through the

mounting collar to the connector. See e.g., FIGs. F, L, and M.

109. The Ethos Chair further includes a tablet assembly. See e.g., B, C, and N.

110. Upon information and belief, Haskells acts of infringement have been, and

continues to be, undertaken with knowledge of the 825 patent and knowing those acts infringe at

least one claim of the 825 patent. Such acts constitute willful infringement and make this case

exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and 285, and entitle Steelcase to enhanced damages

and reasonable attorney fees.

- 23 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.24 Page 24 of 41

111. On information and belief, Haskell has also indirectly infringed the 686 patent by

way of inducing infringement of one or more claims of the 825 patent by its customers,

including, but not limited, to Haskells dealers, distributors, re-sellers, and direct end-customers

to use, sell, offer for sale and/or import the Ethos Chair into the United States knowing it

infringes one or more claims of the 825 patent.

112. On information and belief, Haskell has engaged in such actions with the specific

intent to cause infringement or with willful blindness to the resulting infringement of the 825

patent because Haskell had actual knowledge of the 825 patent and knowledge that its acts were

inducing infringement of the 825 patent.

113. Steelcase has been and continues to be injured and damaged by Haskells

infringement of the 825 patent in an amount to be determined at trial.

114. Haskells infringement has also caused irreparable harm to Steelcase for which

Steelcase has no adequate remedies at law and Steelcase will continue to suffer such irreparable

harm unless and until Haskells infringement is permanently enjoined by this Court.

COUNT V
(PATENT INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 9,414,685)

115. Steelcase incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs and allegations as if fully

set forth herein.

116. Steelcase is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the design covered

by the 685 patent. Steelcase is entitled to enforce the 685 patent and to receive all damages and

the benefits of all other remedies, including injunctive relief, for Haskells infringement.

117. As a complete and first ground for relief, Steelcase hereby charges Haskell with

infringement of the 685 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq.

118. Haskell has at no time been licensed under the 685 patent.

- 24 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.25 Page 25 of 41

119. Haskell had actual notice of the 237 Application under 35 U.S.C. 154(d).

120. On information and belief, Haskell has and continues to directly infringe the 685

patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell in the United States, and/or importing into the

United States, without authority, office and classroom furniture and seating solutions including,

but not limited to, the Ethos Chair, that are covered by one or more claims of the 685 patent.

121. For example, Haskell directly infringes at least claim 1 of the 685 patent, which

states:

The invention claimed is

1. A seating unit for use in a space including a floor surface, the seating unit
comprising:

a base including a continuous bottom ring adapted to be supported above the floor
surface, a pan attached to the bottom ring and including a top pan surface adapted
to support articles above the floor surface, the continuous bottom ring forming a
continuous and unbroken peripheral barrier about the top pan surface that extends
upward from the top pan surface and forming a top ring surface at a height above
the top pan surface, a central hub positioned above the pan and legs extending
from the central hub and connected at lower ends to the top ring surface, the top
pan surface disposed at a height lower than the top ring surface, the base further
including casters mounted below the bottom ring and supporting the bottom ring
above the floor surface; and

a seat structure comprising a one-piece seat shell rotatably attached to and


positioned above the central hub for rotation about a first vertical axis.

Exhibit 5 (685 patent) at col. 10:1-21.

122. Specifically, but without limitation, the Ethos Chair is a seating unit for use in a

space including a floor surface. See e.g., FIGs. A-C.

123. The Ethos Chair has a base with a continuous bottom ring adapted to be supported

above the surface of the floor and a pan attached to the bottom ring. See e.g., FIGs. C and F.

124. The pan attached to the bottom ring of the Ethos Chair base has a top surface

adapted to support articles above the floor. See e.g., FIGs. C and F.

- 25 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.26 Page 26 of 41

125. The bottom ring of the Ethos Chair base is continuous and forms an unbroken

peripheral barrier about the top pan surface that extends upward from the top pan surface and

forms a top ring surface above the top pan surface. See e.g., FIG. F.

126. The Ethos Chair base includes a central hub positioned above the pan and has

legs extending from it and connected at lower ends to the top ring surface. See e.g., FIG. F.

127. The top pan surface of the Ethos Chair base is disposed at a height lower than the

top ring surface. See e.g., FIG. F.

128. The base of the Ethos Chair base includes casters mounted below the bottom ring

and supports the bottom ring above the floor surface. See e.g., FIGs. C, F, G and H.

129. The Ethos Chair includes a seat structure that includes a one-piece seat shell

rotatably attached to and positioned above the central hub for rotation about a vertical axis. See

e.g., FIGs. A, F, I, J, and M.

130. Haskell and certain of its officers, agents, and employees have been aware of the

existence of the 237 Application since at least October 10, 2014, and the 685 patent since

March 8, 2016. Despite such knowledge, Haskell has continued to willfully engage in acts of

infringement without regard to the 237 Application and without regard to the 685 patent and

knowing those acts to infringe at least one claim of the 685 patent.

131. Upon information and belief, Haskells acts of infringement have been and

continues to be undertaken with knowledge of the 685 patent. Such acts constitute willful

infringement and make this case exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and 285, and entitle

Steelcase to enhanced damages and reasonable attorney fees.

132. On information and belief, Haskell has also indirectly infringed the 685 patent by

way of inducing infringement of one or more claims of the 685 patent by its customers,

- 26 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.27 Page 27 of 41

including, but not limited, to Haskells dealers, distributors, re-sellers, and direct end-customers

to use, sell, offer for sale and/or import the Ethos Chair into the United States knowing it

infringes one or more claims of the 685 patent.

133. On information and belief, Haskell has engaged in such actions with the specific

intent to cause infringement or with willful blindness to the resulting infringement of the 685

patent because Haskell had actual knowledge of the 685 patent and knowledge that its acts were

inducing infringement of the 685 patent.

134. Steelcase has been and continues to be injured and damaged by Haskells

infringement in an amount to be determined at trial.

135. Haskells infringement has also caused irreparable harm to Steelcase for which

Steelcase has no adequate remedies at law and Steelcase will continue to suffer such irreparable

harm unless and until Haskells infringement is permanently enjoined by this Court.

COUNT VI
(PATENT INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. DESIGN PATENT NO. D679,923)

136. Steelcase incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs and allegations as if fully

set forth herein.

137. The 923 patent is valid and enforceable.

138. Steelcase is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the design covered

by the 923 patent. Steelcase is entitled to enforce the 923 patent and to receive all damages and

the benefits of all other remedies, including injunctive relief, for Haskells infringement.

139. As a complete and first ground for relief, Steelcase hereby charges Haskell with

infringement of the 923 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq.

140. Haskell has at no time been licensed under the 923 patent.

- 27 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.28 Page 28 of 41

141. On information and belief, Haskell has and continues to directly infringe the 923

patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell in the United States, and/or importing into the

United States, without authority, office and classroom furniture and seating solutions that are

covered by one or more claims of the 923 patent, including but not limited to the Ethos Chair.

See Exhibit 16.

142. Haskells Ethos Chair base has an overall appearance that is substantially the

same as the claimed design in the 923 patent and incorporates the ornamental features claimed

therein.

143. An ordinary observer, giving such attention as a purchaser usually gives, would

be deceived and induced into purchasing the Ethos Chair believing it to be the design claimed in

the 923 patent.

144. Since at least October 11, 2013, Haskell and certain of its officers, agents, and

employees have been aware of the existence of the 923 patent and, despite such knowledge, has

continued to willfully engage in acts of infringement without regard to the 923 patent and

knowing those acts to infringe the claimed design of the 923 patent.

145. Upon information and belief, Haskells acts of infringement have been or will be

undertaken with knowledge of the 923 patent. Such acts constitute willful infringement and

make this case exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and 285, and entitle Steelcase to

enhanced damages and reasonable attorney fees.

146. On information and belief, Haskell has also indirectly infringed the 923 patent by

way of inducing infringement of one or more claims of the 923 patent by its customers,

including, but not limited, to Haskells dealers, distributors, re-sellers, and direct end-customers

- 28 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.29 Page 29 of 41

to use, sell, offer for sale and/or import the Ethos Chair into the United States knowing it

infringes the 923 patent.

147. On information and belief, Haskell has engaged in such actions with the specific

intent to cause infringement or with willful blindness to the resulting infringement of the 923

patent because Haskell had actual knowledge of the 923 patent and knowledge that its acts were

inducing infringement of the 923 patent.

148. Steelcase has been and continues to be injured and damaged by Haskells

infringement of the 923 patent in an amount to be determined at trial.

149. Haskells infringement has also caused irreparable harm to Steelcase for which

Steelcase has no adequate remedies at law and Steelcase will continue to suffer such irreparable

harm unless and until Haskells infringement is permanently enjoined by this Court.

COUNT VII
(PATENT INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 9,226,578)

150. Steelcase incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs and allegations as if fully

set forth herein.

151. Steelcase is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the design covered

by the 578 patent. Steelcase is entitled to enforce the 578 patent and to receive all damages and

the benefits of all other remedies, including injunctive relief, for Haskells infringement.

152. As a complete and first ground for relief, Steelcase hereby charges Haskell with

infringement of the 578 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq.

153. Haskell has at no time been licensed under the 578 patent.

154. On information and belief, Haskell has and continues to directly infringe the 578

patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell in the United States, and/or importing into the

United States, without authority, office and classroom furniture and seating solutions, including,

- 29 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.30 Page 30 of 41

but not limited to, the Echo Series products, that are covered by one or more claims of the 578

patent.

155. For example, Haskell infringes at least claim 1 of the 578 patent, which states:

What is claimed is:

1. A display board system comprising:

a table including a top member and at least a first leg support member, the top
member forming a substantially flat top surface and circumscribed by an outer
edge, the at least one leg support member supporting the top member in a
substantially horizontal position;

a table dock secured to the top member adjacent a portion of the outer edge with a
portion of the table dock extending upward adjacent the outer edge, the table dock
forming an elongated table dock channel having a dock length dimension between
first and second ends, the dock channel opening upwardly and opening
horizontally at the first and second ends and having a base wall member at a
height below the substantially flat top surface of the top member, the dock
channel unobstructed by the top member; and

at least a first substantially flat display panel including a display surface on at


least a first of first and second oppositely facing and substantially parallel side
surfaces, the panel circumscribed by a panel edge, the panel edge having at least
one straight edge having a panel length dimension, the dock length dimension less
than panel length dimension;

wherein at least a portion of the straight edge of the panel is receivable within the
table dock channel with the panel extending out the open first and second ends of
the channel to support the display panel in a substantially upright orientation with
at least a portion of the display panel extending to a height above the flat top
surface.

Exhibit 7 (578 patent) at col. 21:54-22:17.

156. Specifically, but without limitation, the Echo Series products include a display

board system that has a top member with at least a leg support member, a table dock secured to

the top member, and at least a first substantially flat display panel wherein at least a portion of

the straight edge of the panel is receivable within the table dock. See Exhibit 11; see also, FIGs.

D-E (above), O and P (below):

- 30 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.31 Page 31 of 41

FIG. O FIG. P

157. The Echo Series display board system has a table that includes a top member with

a substantially flat top surface with an outer edge and at least one leg support member supporting

the table in a substantially horizontal position. See e.g., FIGs. D, E, O and P; see Exhibit 11.

158. The Echo Series display board system further includes a table dock that is secured

to the top member. The table dock of the Echo Series display board system is adjacent to the

portion of the outer edge of the top member and a portion of the table dock extends upward

adjacent to the outer edge. See Exhibit 11; see e.g., FIGs. Q and R (below):

FIG. Q FIG. R

159. The table dock of the Echo Series display board system has two ends (a first and

second) that forms an elongated table dock channel that opens upwardly and horizontally. The

- 31 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.32 Page 32 of 41

dock channel of the Echo Series display board system has a base wall member that is below the

substantially flat top surface of the top member and is unobstructed by the top member. See e.g.,

FIGs. Q and R; see also Exhibit 11.

160. The Echo Series display board system also includes at least a first substantially

flat display panel. The display panel of the Echo Series display board system is circumstanced

by a panel edge and has a display surface on at least a first of first and second oppositely facing

and substantially parallel side surfaces. The display panel edge has at least one straight edge that

is the length of the display panel and the dimension of the table dock is less than the display

panel length. See e.g., FIGs. D-E (above) and S (below); see also Exhibit 11.

FIG. S

161. At least a portion of the straight edge of the display panel of the Echo Series

display board system is receivable within the table dock channel with the display panel extending

out of the open first and second ends of the dock channel to support the display panel in a

substantially upright orientation and at least a portion of the display panel extending to a height

above the flat top surface. See e.g., FIGs. D-E, and S; see also Exhibit 11.

162. Since at least January 2016, Haskell and certain of its officers, agents, and

employees have been aware of the existence of the 578 patent and, despite such knowledge, has

continued to willfully engage in acts of infringement without regard to the 578 patent and

knowing those acts infringe at least one claim of the 578 patent.

- 32 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.33 Page 33 of 41

163. Upon information and belief, Haskells acts of infringement have been or will be

undertaken with knowledge of the 578 patent. Such acts constitute willful infringement and

make this case exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and 285, and entitle Steelcase to

enhanced damages and reasonable attorney fees.

164. On information and belief, Haskell has also indirectly infringed the 578 patent by

way of inducing infringement of one or more claims of the 578 patent by its customers,

including, but not limited, to Haskells dealers, distributors, re-sellers, and direct end-customers

to use, sell, offer for sale and/or import the Echo Series products, including the display board

system, into the United States knowing it infringes the 578 patent.

165. On information and belief, Haskell has also indirectly infringed the 578 patent by

way of contributing to the infringement of one or more claims of the 578 patent by its

customers, including, but not limited, to Haskells dealers, distributors, re-sellers, and direct end-

customers to use, sell, offer for sale and/or import Haskells Echo Series products, including the

display board system and any component thereof into the United States knowing it infringes one

or more claims of the 578 patent. For example, Haskell contributes to this infringement by

making, using, selling, offering for sale and importing into the United States its Echo Series

products as well as by promoting, advertising, and/or instructing customers and potential

customers about its Echo Series products. See e.g., Exhibit 11.

166. On information and belief, Haskell has engaged in such actions with the specific

intent to cause infringement or with willful blindness to the resulting infringement of the 578

patent because Haskell had actual knowledge of the 578 patent and knowledge that its acts were

inducing infringement of the 578 patent.

- 33 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.34 Page 34 of 41

167. Steelcase has been and continues to be injured and damaged by Haskells

infringement of the 578 patent in an amount to be determined at trial.

168. Haskells infringement has also caused irreparable harm to Steelcase for which

Steelcase has no adequate remedies at law and Steelcase will continue to suffer such irreparable

harm unless and until Haskells infringement is permanently enjoined by this Court.

COUNT VIII
(PATENT INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 9,066,589)

169. Steelcase incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs and allegations as if fully

set forth herein.

170. Steelcase is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the design covered

by the 589 patent. Steelcase is entitled to enforce the 589 patent and to receive all damages and

the benefits of all other remedies, including injunctive relief, for Haskells infringement.

171. As a complete and first ground for relief, Steelcase hereby charges Haskell with

infringement of the 589 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq.

172. Haskell has at no time been licensed under the 589 patent.

173. On information and belief, Haskell has and continues to directly infringe the 589

patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell in the United States, and/or importing into the

United States, without authority, office and classroom furniture and seating solutions, including,

but not limited to, the Echo Series products, that are covered by one or more claims of the 589

patent.

174. For example, Haskell infringes at least claim 18 of the 589 patent, which states:

A furniture configuration comprising:

a table assembly including a top member and a leg structure, the top member
forming a substantially flat top surface and circumscribed by an outer edge, the
leg structure supporting the top member in a substantially horizontal position at a
first height;

- 34 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.35 Page 35 of 41

a first table dock supported by the table assembly adjacent the top surface and
forming a table dock channel that opens upwardly that is unobstructed by the top
member;

at least a first substantially flat display panel having a display surface on at least a
first of first and second oppositely facing and substantially parallel side surfaces,
the panel circumscribed by a panel edge; and

a first storage coupler supported by the table assembly at a second height below
the first height, the first storage coupler configured to releaseably receive at the
least a first panel;

Wherein the display panel is positionable in at least a first use position with a
portion of the panel edge gripped in the dock channel and the display panel
extending vertically upward adjacent the top surface of the top member and a
second storage position with the display panel engaged by the first storage coupler
and located below the top member and below the first height.

Exhibit 6 (the 589 patent) at col. 23:59-24:17.

175. Specifically, but without limitation, the Echo Series is a furniture configuration

that includes a table assembly, a first table dock, at least a first substantially flat display panel,

and first storage coupler. See e.g., FIGs. D-E, Q-S (above), T and U (below); see also Exhibit

11.

FIG. T FIG. U

176. The Echo Series furniture configuration includes a table assembly that has a top

member that has a substantially flat top surface that is circumscribed by an outer edge, and a leg

structure that supports the top member in a substantially horizontal position. See e.g., FIGs. D-E,

and O-P; see also Exhibit 11.

- 35 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.36 Page 36 of 41

177. The Echo Series furniture configuration further includes a first table dock that is

supported by the table assembly adjacent to the top surface of the table assembly of the Echo

Series furniture configuration. The first table dock of the Echo Series furniture configuration

forms a table dock channel that opens upwardly and is unobstructed by the top member. See

e.g., FIGs. D-E, O-P, and Q-R; see also Exhibit 11.

178. The Echo Series furniture configuration includes at least a first substantially flat

display panel that is circumscribed by a panel edge and has a display surface on at least a first of

a first and second oppositely facing and substantially parallel side surfaces. See e.g., FIGs. D-E,

and S; see also Exhibit 11.

179. The table assembly of the Echo Series furniture configuration supports a first

storage coupler that is configured to releaseably receive at least the first display panel. The first

storage coupler is at a second height below the first height. See e.g., FIGs. E, U (above), and T

(below); see also Exhibit 11.

FIG. T

180. The display panel of the Echo Series furniture configuration is positionable in at

least a first use position with a portion of the display panel edge gripped in the dock channel and

extending vertically upward adjacent the top surface of the top member of the Echo Series

furniture configuration. See e.g., FIGs. S (below); see also Exhibit 11.

- 36 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.37 Page 37 of 41

FIG. S

181. The display panel of the Echo Series furniture configuration provides a second

storage position with the display panel engaged by the first storage coupler and located below the

top member and below the first height. See e.g., FIG. U (below); see also Exhibit 11.

FIG. U

182. Since at least January 2016, Haskell and certain of its officers, agents, and

employees have been aware of the existence of the 589 patent and, despite such knowledge, has

continued to willfully engage in acts of infringement without regard to the 589 patent and

knowing those acts to infringe at least one claim of the 589 patent.

183. Upon information and belief, Haskells acts of infringement have been or will be

undertaken with knowledge of the 589 patent. Such acts constitute willful infringement and

make this case exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and 285, and entitle Steelcase to

enhanced damages and reasonable attorney fees.

184. On information and belief, Haskell has also indirectly infringed the 589 patent by

way of inducing infringement of one or more claims of the 589 patent by its customers,

- 37 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.38 Page 38 of 41

including, but not limited, to Haskells dealers, distributors, re-sellers, and direct end-customers

to use, sell, offer for sale and/or import the Echo Series products into the United States knowing

it infringes the 589 patent.

185. On information and belief, Haskell has also indirectly infringed the 589 patent by

way of contributing to the infringement of one or more claims of the 589 patent by its

customers, including, but not limited, to Haskells dealers, distributors, re-sellers, and direct end-

customers to use, sell, offer for sale and/or import Haskells Echo Series products and any

component thereof into the United States knowing it infringes one or more claims of the 589

patent. For example, Haskell contributes to this infringement by making, using, selling, offering

for sale and importing into the United States its Echo Series products as well as by promoting,

advertising, and/or instructing customers and potential customers about its Echo Series products

and the infringing Echo Series furniture configuration. See e.g., Exhibit 11.

186. On information and belief, Haskell has engaged in such actions with the specific

intent to cause infringement or with willful blindness to the resulting infringement of the 589

patent because Haskell had actual knowledge of the 589 patent and knowledge that its acts were

inducing infringement of the 589 patent.

187. Steelcase has been and continues to be injured and damaged by Haskells

infringement of the 589 patent in an amount to be determined at trial.

188. Haskells infringement has also caused irreparable harm to Steelcase for which

Steelcase has no adequate remedies at law and Steelcase will continue to suffer such irreparable

harm unless and until Haskells infringement is permanently enjoined by this Court.

- 38 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.39 Page 39 of 41

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Steelcase prays for a Judgment that:

A. Haskell has infringed the 609 patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale

in the United States and/or importing into the United States products that are covered by the

claim of the 609 patent;

B. Haskell has infringed the 686 patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale

in the United States and/or importing into the United States products that are covered by the

claim of the 686 patent;

C. Haskell has infringed the 087 patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale

in the United States and/or importing into the United States products that are covered by the

claim of the 087 patent;

D. Haskell has infringed the 825 patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale

in the United States and/or importing into the United States products that are covered by the

claim of the 825 patent;

E. Haskell has infringed the 685 patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale

in the United States and/or importing into the United States products that are covered by the

claim of the 685 patent;

F. Haskell has infringed the 923 patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale

in the United States and/or importing into the United States products that are covered by the

claim of the 923 patent;

G. Haskell has infringed the 578 patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale

in the United States and/or importing into the United States products that are covered by the

claim of the 578 patent;

- 39 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.40 Page 40 of 41

H. Haskell has infringed the 589 patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale

in the United States and/or importing into the United States products that are covered by the

claim of the 589 patent;

Haskell, its officers, directors, employees, agents, subsidiaries, licensees, servants,

successors and assigns, and any and all persons acting in privity or in concert or participation

with Defendant, be preliminarily and permanently enjoined from infringement all and/or any of

the Steelcase Patents under 35 U.S.C. 283;

I. An award of monetary damages adequate to compensate Steelcase for Haskells

infringement of all and/or any of the Steelcase Patents pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, including

provisional damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 154(d), together with pre-judgment and post-

judgment interest.

J. Additional remedies under 35 U.S.C. 289 for Haskells infringement of the 923

patent.

K. Enhanced damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 of up to three times the amount

found or assessed based on Haskells willful infringement;

L. An award of Steelcases reasonable attorneys fees and costs pursuant to 35

U.S.C. 285 or as otherwise permitted by law; and

M. For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

- 40 -
Case 1:17-cv-00182 ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/17 PageID.41 Page 41 of 41

JURY DEMAND

Steelcase hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues triable by jury.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: February 27, 2017 By: /s/ Mark S. Pendery


Mark S. Pendery
MILLER, JOHNSON, SNELL & CUMMISKEY, P.L.C.
45 Ottawa Ave, SW Suite 1100
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
Telephone: 616.831.1700
Facsimile: 616.831.1701

Brent A. Hawkins (pro hac pending)


Teri H.P. Nguyen (pro hac pending)
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: 650.815.7400
Facsimile: 650.815.7401

Attorneys for Plaintiff Steelcase, Inc.

- 41 -
MJ_DMS 28547664v1 88100-636

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen