Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The AET faculty can indeed learn from this by identifying the
talents of the students that are enrolled in the courses and
putting them together with other students that compliment those
talents. It is a little harder to identify the students who are
nontraditional and online, but in Masters work it should be
easier.
95%
Lower
N Mean SE Mean Bound Z P
8 127.000 0.707 125.837 2.83 0.002
3. (A machine is used to fill containers with a liquid product. Fill volume can be
assumed to be normally distributed. A random sample of 10 containers is
selected, and the net contents (oz) are as follows: 12.03, 12.01, 12.04,
12.02, 12.05, 11.98, 11.96, 12.02, 12.05, and 11.99.
(a) Suppose that the manufacturer wants to be sure that the mean net
content exceeds 12 oz. What conclusions can be drawn from the data
(use =0.01)?
One-Sample Z: C1
Test of mu = 12 vs > 12
The assumed standard deviation = 0.0303
99%
Lower
Variable N Mean StDev SE Mean Bound Z P
C1 10 12.0150 0.0303 0.0096 11.9927 1.57 0.059
fill volume.
One-Sample Z: C1
Test of mu = 12 vs not = 12
The assumed standard deviation = 0.0303
4. Using the data bellow (Table 7.1 at your text) answer the
following question (Using Minitab).
a. Calculate mean, mode, median, standard deviation and
variance for the data in Table 7.1.
Variable Maximum
Width 4.0210
Variable Q3 Maximum
Gauge 0.25000 0.27300
Histogram of Width
Normal
35 Mean 3.995
StDev 0.008083
N 93
30
25
Frequency
20
15
10
0
3.97 3.98 3.99 4.00 4.01 4.02
Width
The distribution is normal and the bulk of the pieces falls at 3.99.
The correlation coefficient of -.092 means that width and gauge are very loosely
inversely proportional. That is, generally speaking, width and gauge move in
opposite directions and are loosely correlated.
5. Determine the trial central line and control limits for a p chart
using the following data, which are for the payment of dental
insurance claims. Plot the values on graph paper and determine
if the process is stable. If there are any out -of-control points,
assume an assignable cause and determine the revised central
line and control limits.
P Chart of No. N.C
0.07 1
0.06
0.05
Proportion
0.04 UCL=0.04016
0.03
0.02 _
P=0.01747
0.01
0.00 LCL=0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
Sample
0.03
Proportion
0.02
_
P=0.01542
0.01
0.00 LCL=0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
Sample
6. Determine the trial limits and revised control limits for a u chart
using the data in the table for the surface finish of rolls of white
paper. Assume any out -of-control points have assignable
causes.
U Chart of Total N.C
6
1
1
5 UCL=5.043
Sample Count Per Unit
4
_
U=3.315
3
2
LCL=1.588
1
1
1
0
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28
Sample
Tests performed with unequal sample sizes
U Chart of Total N.C
5 UCL=5.097
Sample Count Per Unit
4
_
U=3.358
3
2
LCL=1.620
1
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
Sample
Tests performed with unequal sample sizes
30
Sample Count
20
10
UCL=6.31
__
NP=2.1
0 LCL=0
1
Sample
If the data has been compared to the original data done for testing and
all of the data indicates there are no out of spec process controls, then
the revised control limits will have to be moved to fit the newly gathered
data for the next run. If the nonconformities occurred on the low side of
the spectrum, then move the revised control limits lower. If the
phenomenon occurred on the high side, then move the control limits up.