Aquino v COMELEC

On 20 March 1995, Agapito A. Aquino filed his Certificate of Candidacy for the
position of Representative for the new Second Legislative District of Makati
City. In his certificate of candidacy, Aquino stated that he was a resident of
the aforementioned district for 10 months. Faced with a petition for
disqualification, he amended the entry on his residency in his certificate of
candidacy to 1 year and 13 days. The Commission on Elections dismissed the
petition on 6 May and allowed Aquino to run in the election of 8 May. Aquino
won. Acting on amotion for reconsideration of the above dismissal, the
Commission on Election later issued an order suspending the proclamation of
Aquino until the Commission resolved the issue. On 2 June, the Commission
on Elections found Aquino ineligible and disqualified for the elective office for
lack of constitutional qualification of residence

on the ground that the latter lacked the residence qualification as a candidate for
congressman which, under Section 6, Art. VI of the 1987 the Constitution, should be for
a period not less than one (1) year immediately preceding the May 8, 1995 elections.
On May 15, 1995, COMELEC en banc issued an Order suspending petitioner's
proclamation. The dispositive portion of the order reads:

WHEREFORE, pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of Republic Act No.

6646, the Board of Canvassers of the City of Makati is hereby directed to
complete the canvassing of election returns of the Second District of Makati,
but to suspend the proclamation of respondent Agapito A. Aquino should he
obtain the winning number of votes for the position of Representative of the
Second District of the City of Makati, until the motion for reconsideration filed
by the petitioners on May 7, 1995, shall have been resolved by the
Commission.

The Executive Director, this Commission, is directed to cause the immediate

implementation of this Order. The Clerk of Court of the Commission is
likewise directed to inform the parties by the fastest means available of this
Order, and to calendar the hearing of the Motion for Reconsideration on May
17, 1995, at 10:00 in the morning, PICC Press Center, Pasay City.

On May 16, 1995, petitioner filed his Comment/Opposition with urgent motion to lift order of
suspension of proclamation.

On June 1, 1995, petitioner filed a "Motion to File Supplemental Memorandum and Motion to
Resolve Urgent Motion to Resolve Motion to Lift Suspension of Proclamation" wherein he
manifested his intention to raise, among others, the issue of whether of not the determination
of the qualifications of petitioner after the elections is lodged exclusively in the House of
Representatives Electoral Tribunal pursuant to Section 17, Article VI of the 1987 Constitution.

Resolving petitioner's motion to lift suspension of his proclamation, the COMELEC en

banc issued an Order on June 2, 1995, the decretal portion thereof residing:

Pursuant to the said provisions and considering the attendant circumstances

of the case, the Commission RESOLVED to proceed with the promulgation
but to suspend its rules, to accept the filing of the aforesaid motion, and to
allow the parties to be heard thereon because the issue of jurisdiction now
before the Commission has to be studied with more reflection and
judiciousness. 12

On the same day, June 2, 1995, the COMELEC en banc issued a Resolution reversing the
resolution of the Second Division dated May 6, 1995. The fallo reads as follows:

WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, petitioners' Motion for

Reconsideration of the Resolution of the Second Division, promulgated on
May 6, 1995, is GRANTED. Respondent Agapito A. Aquino is declared
ineligible and thus disqualified as a candidate for the Office of Representative
 of the Second Legislative District of Makati City in the May 8, 1995 elections,
for lack of the constitutional qualification of residence. Consequently, the
order of suspension of proclamation of the respondent should he obtain the
winning number of votes, issued by this Commission on May 15, 1995 is now
made permanent.

Upon the finality of this Resolution, the Board of Canvassers of the City of
Makati shall immediately reconvene and, on the basis of the completed
canvass of election returns, determine the winner out of the remaining
qualified candidates, who shall be immediately be proclaimed.

SO ORDERED. 13

RA 6646
Section 6. Effect of Disqualification Case. - Any candidate who has been declared by final
judgment to be disqualified shall not be voted for, and the votes cast for him shall not be
counted. If for any reason a candidate is not declared by final judgment before an election to
be disqualified and he is voted for and receives the winning number of votes in such election,
the Court or Commission shall continue with the trial and hearing of the action, inquiry, or
protest and, upon motion of the complainant or any intervenor, may during the pendency
thereof order the suspension of the proclamation of such candidate whenever the evidence
of his guilt is strong.
Section 17, Article VI of the 1987 Constitution.

Section 17. The Senate and the House of Representatives shall each
have an Electoral Tribunal which shall be the sole judge of all contests
relating to the election, returns, and qualifications of their respective
Members. Each Electoral Tribunal shall be composed of nine Members,
three of whom shall be Justices of the Supreme Court to be designated
by the Chief Justice, and the remaining six shall be Members of the
Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case may be, who shall
be chosen on the basis of proportional representation from the political
parties and the parties or organizations registered under the party-list
system represented therein. The senior Justice in the Electoral Tribunal
shall be its Chairman.