Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
To cite this Article Thomas, Jobin , Joseph, Sabu andThrivikramaji, K. P.(2010) 'Morphometric aspects of a small tropical
mountain river system, the southern Western Ghats, India', International Journal of Digital Earth, 3: 2, 135 — 156, First
published on: 08 January 2010 (iFirst)
To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/17538940903464370
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17538940903464370
This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or
systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or
distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents
will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses
should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss,
actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly
or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
International Journal of Digital Earth,
Vol. 3, No. 2, June 2010, 135156
Introduction
Since the early research investigations of Horton (1945), Thornbury (1954), and
Strahler (1964) emphasized the advantages of drainage pattern analysis in
characterizing geomorphic features and inferring the degree of structural and
lithological controls in the evolution of fluvial landforms. Geology, relief, and
climate are the key determinants of running water ecosystems functioning at the
basin scale (Lotspeich and Platts 1982, Frissel et al. 1986). Morphometric
descriptors represent relatively simple approaches to describe basin processes and
to compare basin characteristics (Mesa 2006) and enable an enhanced understanding
of the geological and geomorphic history of a drainage basin (Strahler 1964). The
morphometric assessment helps to elaborate a primary hydrological diagnosis in
order to predict approximate behavior of a watershed if correctly coupled with
geomorphology and geology (Esper 2008). The hydrological response of a river basin
can be interrelated with the physiographic characteristics of the drainage basin, such
as size, shape, slope, drainage density and size, and length of the streams, etc.
(Chorley 1969, Gregory and Walling 1973). Hence, morphometric analysis of a
watershed is an essential first step, toward basic understanding of watershed
dynamics.
In terrain characterization studies, and especially on spatial variabilities of
morphometric parameters, the contributions of Mather and Doornkamp (1970),
Gardiner (1978), and Gregory (1978) are considered immensely important. In the
Indian regional context, morphometric analysis was employed for characterizing
watersheds (Nag 1998, Vittala et al. 2004), for the prioritization of micro watersheds
(Ratnam et al. 2005) and for the development of groundwater resources (Sreedevi
et al. 2004, 2009). Locally in Kerala, examples of similar approaches have been
applied in the Kuttiyadi (James and Padmini 1983), Chalakkudy (Maya 1997), and
in Pamba (Rajendran 1982) watersheds. Recently, Vijith and Satheesh (2006) as well
as Manu and Anirudhan (2008) analyzed the drainage characteristics of Meenachil
and Achankovil Rivers using remote sensing and Geographic Information System
(GIS) as tools.
Downloaded By: [Thomas, Jobin] At: 16:06 17 May 2010
Study area
The MW (n6th, L 37.81 km, Area275.71 km2; N Lat. 108 01? 55ƒ to 108 11?
31ƒ and E Long. 768 59? 45ƒ to 778 14? 52ƒ), a major sub-watershed (at elevations
spanning between 740 and 2690 m) of the west flowing Periyar in Kerala, India
(Figures 1 and 2), is etched in the Precambrian rocks of the southern Western Ghats
and specifically those of the Munnar Plateau, which is home to an important peak,
viz., Anai Mudi (2690 m) which is the tallest peak south of the Himalayas.
The sixth order Muthirapuzha main stem trends approximately in a NESW
direction, while its two fifth order tributaries, viz., Kannimala creek follows an
approximately southerly trend while Gudrale creek has established an essentially
westerly trend. Stream network of the MW dissects nearly 75% of the Munnar
plateau a cardinal motif of the southern Western Ghats with a roughly EW
trending long axis and bounded to the north by the Kannan Devan hills and
International Journal of Digital Earth 137
Downloaded By: [Thomas, Jobin] At: 16:06 17 May 2010
Cardamom hills in the south. According to Soman (2002), the Munnar plateau is
portion of an extensive plantation surface with a southwesterly slope tending to
descend in a stepped manner. While U shaped valleys and broad ridges characterize
the plateau, the MW has two other local plantation surfaces.
addition, both concordant and discordant patches and veins of non-foliated granite
and aplite are present in the granitic gneiss. Granite is seen exposed as WNWESE
trending linear body with irregular outline surrounded by granitic gneiss, migmatite,
and calc-granulite. In the area, south of Devikulam, the granite is exposed in the core
of a major fold. The calc-granulite is a medium grained rock and the weathered
surfaces are puckered, particularly near contact with migmatite, due to resistant
veins of quartzo-feldspathic material (Thampi 1987). A thin layer of laterite of about
15.0 cm has developed in the high plateau around Eravikulam, 12.0 km to the NNE
of Munnar.
The foliation trends indicate the presence of a major synclinal-axial trace,
contained mostly in the hornblende-biotite gneiss, displaying a high amplitude plan
view which is a characteristic of Precambrian terrains. A minor anticlinal-axial trace
of NWSE orientation appears within an enclave of granitic gneiss to the immediate
south of the center in Figure 3. Two major lineaments, crossing roughly at right
angle, have been discerned in area-one trends NESW, while the other (though only a
portion appears in the map) has a NWSE alignment. A third minor lineament of
nearly EW trend is noticed toward the southwestern border of the MW.
The soils of MW are categorized into major soil taxonomic units as fine loamy,
mixed, thermic family of Mollic Paleudalfs, clayey mixed, thermic family of Typic
Palehumults, and clayey skeletal, mixed, isohyperthermic family of Ustic Palehu-
mults. These are very deep, well-drained hill soils developed on gneissic parent
material where in the former, gneissic material occupy 3040% of the volume below
100125 cm (Anon 2006). The O horizon, highly enriched in organic matter, is dark
and reddish brown to black in color. The soil under forest cover is quite fertile and
Downloaded By: [Thomas, Jobin] At: 16:06 17 May 2010
Strahler (1964). The morphometric parameters were divided into three categories:
linear, areal, and relief aspects and these parameters. The basic parameters such as
basin area, perimeter, length, and stream length were extracted from the geodatabase
and other parameters were derived from these basic parameters by means of various
mathematical equations (Table 1).
Results
Figure 1 is a sketch of MW boundary including the stream network and the 14 fourth
order sub-watersheds. The linear, areal, and relief parameters have been examined and
detailed in the following along with the highlights of the results.
Drainage pattern
The MW in general, exhibits a dominantly parallel pattern; while semi-centripetal,
trellis, and rectangular patterns co-exist. The parallel pattern with low order
sub-parallel streams forms slopes joining higher order streams at nearly uniform
Downloaded By: [Thomas, Jobin] At: 16:06 17 May 2010
intervals are a characteristic of areas with steep slopes where channels are controlled
by structure, though departure from the former also appears. Semi-centripetal pattern
is inferred toward the head of Devikulam valley, where lower order streams head to a
central depression before draining out. The drainage system upstream of the
Maduppatty reservoir (SW1 and SW2), is rectangular and the mainstream makes
several sharp and nearly right-angled bends.
Barbed drainage pattern is noticed in Kannimala creek watershed and at the
confluence of the mainstream with Gudrale creek. Thampi (1987) reported that to the
west of Munnar (Figure 1), i.e. in SW12, third order streams frequently bend at near-
right angles to cut through ridges resulting in a trellis pattern of drainage. Further,
straight channel segments and preferred direction of alignment of streams reflect
fracture/lineament control on drainage. Diverse stream orientations like NS, NW
SE, NESW, etc. observed in the MW. The ‘boat hook bend’ shape of channel at the
confluence of Kannimala creek with Muthirapuzha at Munnar is a relict of paleo
drainage (Thampi 1987). The asymmetry of the MW, with eight left bank fourth order
sub-watersheds and six right bank fourth order sub-watersheds, is an attribution to the
tectonic history of the Munnar plateau, and Soman (2002) assigns a late Paleocene age
to the latter.
Linear aspects
Perimeter (P)
The data on perimeter of MW (109.93 km) and that of 14 fourth order
sub-watersheds are given in Table 2. Among the sub-watersheds, SW10 has the
largest P (24.45 km), registering a larger basin area (23.07), while the perimeter of
SW8 (7.16 km) is the smallest of all.
Linear aspects
1. Perimeter (P) Length of the km
watershed boundary
2. Basin length (Lb) Maximum length of the km
watershed measured
parallel to the main
drainage line
3. Stream order Hierarchical ordering Dimensionless Strahler (1957)
(Nu)
4. Stream length Length of the major km Horton (1945)
(Lu) stream
5. Bifurcation ratio Rb Nu/N(u1), Dimensionless Horton (1945)
(Rb) where Nu is number of
streams of any given
order and N(u1) is
Downloaded By: [Thomas, Jobin] At: 16:06 17 May 2010
9. Drainage density
aLt where aLt km km2 Horton (1945)
Dd
/ ;
(Dd) A
is the total length of all
the ordered streams
aNt
10. Stream frequency /Fs ; where Nt is km 2 Horton (1945)
A
(Fs) total number of stream
segments of all orders
11. Drainage texture TDd Fs km km 4 Smith (1950)
(T)
12. Length of Lg1/2Dd km Horton (1945)
overland flow
(Lg)
13. Constant of C 1/Dd km Schumm
channel (1956)
maintenance (C)
14. Form factor (Ff) Ff A/Lb2 Dimensionless Horton (1945)
15. Circularity ratio Rc 4pA/P2 Dimensionless Miller (1953)
(Rc)
142 J. Thomas et al.
Table 1 (Continued)
Sl. No. Parameters Definition Units References
pffiffiffiffi
1:128 A
16. Elongation ratio /Re Dimensionless Schumm
Lb
(Re) (1956)
17. Shape index (Sw) Sw 1/Ff Dimensionless Horton (1932)
Relief aspects
18. Bain relief (R) R Hh, where H is km Schumm
maximum elevation and (1956)
h is minimum
elevation within the
basin
19. Relief ratio (Rr) Rr R/Lb Dimensionless Schumm
(1956)
20. Ruggedness Rn R Dd Dimensionless Strahler (1958)
number (Rn)
21. Dissection index DI R/Ra, where Ra Dimensionless Singh and
Downloaded By: [Thomas, Jobin] At: 16:06 17 May 2010
are of short values (Lb 53 km). Further, the sub-watersheds are relatively elongate,
consequently covering larger basin areas (r0.96), and hence affirming the role of
head-ward erosion in making lengthy channels.
Parameters SW1 SW2 SW3 SW4 SW5 SW6 SW7 SW8 SW9 SW10 SW11 SW12 SW13 SW14 MW
P 15.66 15.29 11.21 18.32 19.41 17.52 9.02 7.16 14.65 24.45 9.36 19.49 21.16 10.69 109.93
Lb 5.29 5.35 4.43 6.12 8.23 6.45 2.68 2.34 4.01 8.18 4.09 8.39 8.92 3.69 37.81
Number of streams N1 62 61 26 41 86 62 21 15 27 113 33 94 94 27 1243
N2 15 16 7 9 16 17 5 4 6 26 8 23 29 6 320
N3 3 6 2 3 3 4 2 2 2 4 2 3 5 2 81
N4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14
143
Rl 21 1.12 1.02 1.22 1.50 1.12 0.96 1.45 0.98 1.05 1.21 1.20 1.00 1.02 0.80 1.08
Downloaded By: [Thomas, Jobin] At: 16:06 17 May 2010
144
Table 2 (Continued)
Parameters SW1 SW2 SW3 SW4 SW5 SW6 SW7 SW8 SW9 SW10 SW11 SW12 SW13 SW14 MW
J. Thomas et al.
Rl 32 2.96 1.27 2.58 1.38 6.70 3.47 0.91 1.41 1.88 2.52 2.21 2.90 1.63 2.75 2.02
Rl 43 0.95 4.79 0.52 1.97 0.29 1.73 0.22 0.35 0.71 3.15 0.95 5.15 8.12 0.31 2.15
Rl 54 2.68
Rl 65 2.71
Rl 1.68 2.36 1.44 1.62 2.70 2.05 0.86 0.91 1.21 2.29 1.45 3.02 3.59 1.29 2.13
Rho 0.42 0.57 0.47 0.46 0.59 0.52 0.30 0.35 0.38 0.46 0.43 0.61 0.77 0.41 0.50
Note: P, perimeter; Lb, basin length; Rb, bifurcation ratio; Rl, stream length ratio; and Rho, Rho coefficient.
International Journal of Digital Earth 145
anomalous development of catchments. The mean length in SW10, SW12, and SW13
increased abruptly from the general trend, which is indicative of consequences of
exertion of pressure by structural elements. Hack (1957) empirically defined the
relationship between watershed area and stream length as L 1.4 A0.6, while in this
study, though a similar relation (L 1.238 A0.63) manifests, but with different
intercept and exponent, which also indicates head-ward erosion as the driver of
channel network growth and extension. This confirms the significant role of rainfall
in the drainage network development.
other (Mekel 1970, Chow et al. 1988). The shape of watersheds also exerts a significant
control on Rb (Verstappen 1983). The variations in Rb values are a reflection of the
differences in the shape of stream network (Ghosh and Chhibber 1984). In respect of
MW, Rb attains a value of 4.26, while the values for the 14 sub-watersheds vary from
2.58 to 4.95 (Table 2), which is comparable to that of mountainous or highly dissected
areas (Horton 1945). The closer range, in the variations of mean bifurcation ratio of
the sub-watersheds (SW1, SW2 and SW6; SW3, SW4, SW9, SW 11, and SW14; SW10
and SW12; SW7 and SW8; SW5 and SW13) is ascribed to the geometrical similarities
among the watersheds. High Rb values in SW5, SW10, SW12, and SW13 may indicate
high overland flow and discharge due to hilly nature of terrain plus steeper disposition
of slopes, while low Rb values in SW3, SW7, and SW8 can be a reflection high
infiltration rate and lesser number of channels.
The Rb of the successive stream orders (in SW2, SW5, SW10, SW12, and SW13),
with much larger spread is interpreted as a predominant outcome from geological
attributes (Strahler 1952). The hypothesis proposed by Giusti and Schneider (1965)
suggests that the general trend of the bifurcation ratios confirms that the Rb values
within a region decreases with increase in order. The deviation from the above
hypothesis in the sub-watersheds (SW1, SW2, SW6, SW10, SW12, and SW13)
indicates that geology and relief have affected the branching of streams. The second
postulation implies that the basins of equal order, but variable areas tend to have the
smallest Rbs in the smallest areas and a high positive correlation between basin area
and Rb (r 0.96) confirms the same. The morphometric analysis of Achankovil
River, flowing through the Achankovil Shear Zone in the Southern Kerala reported
Rb values in the range of 3.46 and 5.50 (Manu and Anirudhan 2008). Further, the
poor correlation reflected by low correlation coefficients for Rb with Dd (r 0.09),
with Fs (r 0.10), and with Lb (r0.38) clearly demonstrate the axiom
that stream organization depends on variables like overall geological structure,
lithological characteristics, climate, and vegetation.
146 J. Thomas et al.
Areal aspects
Area (A)
The MW drains an area of 271.75 km2 and the area of each fourth order
sub-watersheds are specified in Table 3. Among the 14 sub-watersheds, SW8 is the
smallest of all (A 2.89 km2), whereas SW10 is the largest (A 23.07 km2). Six
sub-watersheds have areas less than 10 km2 while SW10 and SW13 have areas in
excess of 20 km2. The mean area of fourth order watershed stands at 11.43 km2.
A 12.28 11.68 6.29 10.50 17.72 12.04 4.41 2.89 7.87 23.07 4.63 18.62 22.09 5.98 271.75
Dd 3.83 3.65 3.92 3.33 3.61 3.99 3.58 3.45 2.73 3.73 4.36 3.69 3.45 3.92 3.57
Fs 6.60 7.19 5.72 5.14 5.98 6.98 6.58 7.61 4.57 6.24 9.50 6.50 5.84 6.02 6.12
T 25.28 26.24 22.42 17.12 21.59 27.85 23.56 26.25 12.48 23.28 41.42 23.99 20.15 23.60 21.85
Lg 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.18 0.13 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.14
C 0.26 0.27 0.26 0.30 0.28 0.25 0.28 0.29 0.37 0.27 0.23 0.27 0.29 0.26 0.28
Ff 0.44 0.41 0.32 0.28 0.26 0.29 0.61 0.53 0.49 0.34 0.28 0.26 0.28 0.44 0.19
Rc 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.39 0.59 0.49 0.68 0.71 0.46 0.48 0.66 0.62 0.62 0.66 0.28
Re 0.75 0.72 0.64 0.60 0.58 0.61 0.88 0.82 0.79 0.66 0.59 0.58 0.59 0.75 0.49
Sw 2.28 2.45 3.12 3.57 3.82 3.46 1.63 1.89 2.04 2.90 3.61 3.78 3.60 2.28 5.26
Note: A, area; Dd, drainage density; Fs, stream frequency; T, drainage texture; Lg, length of overland flow; C, constant of channel maintenance; Ff, form factor; Rc,
circularity ratio; Re, elongation ratio; and Sw, shape index.
147
148 J. Thomas et al.
results of all sub-watersheds, suggesting that terrain is steep and impervious and
highly dissected as well as the region receives high precipitation (Horton 1932,
Langbein 1947). SW11 has the highest (4.36) value and SW9 possesses the lowest
(2.73). The MW and its fourth order sub-watersheds are moderate to well-drained,
wherein geological factors, particularly lithology, resistance of rocks to erosion, and
infiltration capacity determine the drainage density variations.
lithology, soil type, relief, and stage of development of a watershed. The T values of
MW and 14 sub-watersheds appear in Table 3. Smith (1950) identified five different
texture classes based on Dd values viz., very coarse (B2), coarse (24), moderate
(46), fine (68), and very fine (8). In the report here, MW and the sub-watersheds
like SW1, SW2, SW5, SW10, SW12, and SW13 group under moderate texture, while
rest of the sub-watersheds are texturally coarse.
indicating higher flow peaks but of shorter duration, while SW4, SW5, SW6, SW11,
SW12, and SW13 have low Ff (50.30) implying a more elongate plan view of
watersheds and suggesting consequent flatter peak flows of longer duration.
Relief aspects
Basin relief (R)
R is a parameter that determines the stream gradient and influences flood pattern
and volume of sediment that can be transported (Hadley and Schumm 1961). It may
be unduly influenced by one isolated peak within the watershed. Basin relief is an
important factor in understanding denudational characteristics of the basin
(Sreedevi et al. 2004). The MW is endowed with an R of 1950 m, while that of
150 J. Thomas et al.
14 sub-watersheds are given in Table 4. The larger R values are a result of the paleo
and neo tectonic regimen of the southern Western Ghats.
tabulated in Table 4. The Rn values for the sub-watersheds range between 1.46
(SW2) and 4.44 (SW10). The high ruggedness value of MW and sub-watersheds
implies that these tracts are more prone to soil erosion and have intrinsic structural
complexity in association with relief and drainage density (Vijith and Satheesh 2006).
Parameters SW1 SW2 SW3 SW4 SW5 SW6 SW7 SW8 SW9 SW10 SW11 SW12 SW13 SW14 MW
R 760 400 880 890 1070 950 560 600 725 1190 742 490 743 1096 1950
Rr 0.14 0.07 0.20 0.15 0.13 0.15 0.21 0.26 0.18 0.15 0.18 0.06 0.08 0.30 0.05
Rn 2.91 1.46 3.45 2.96 3.86 3.79 2.00 2.07 1.98 4.44 3.24 1.81 2.56 4.30 6.96
DI 0.36 0.20 0.44 0.42 0.50 0.43 0.30 0.29 0.37 0.59 0.40 0.30 0.44 0.73 0.87
Es (m) 2122 2203 2468 2640 2600 2593 1834 2058 2249 2556 2053 1848 1822 1880 2122
Em (m) 1760 1760 1620 1760 1580 1700 1560 1700 1580 1500 1500 1440 1440 960 740
Rg 0.07 0.08 0.19 0.14 0.12 0.14 0.10 0.15 0.17 0.13 0.14 0.05 0.04 0.25 0.04
MRn 0.22 0.12 0.35 0.27 0.25 0.27 0.27 0.35 0.26 0.25 0.34 0.11 0.16 0.45 0.12
Note: R, basin relief; Rr, relief ratio; Rn, ruggedness number; DI, dissection index; Es, elevation at source; Em, elevation at mouth; Rg, gradient ratio; and MRn, Melton
ruggedness number.
151
152 J. Thomas et al.
in the sub-watersheds, MRn ranges from 0.11 to 0.45 (Table 4). These values are
comparable to the results of Marchi et al. (1993) in the Eastern Italian Alps.
According to the classification of Wilford et al. (2004), SW3, SW8, SW11, and SW14
are debris flood watersheds where bed load component dominates sediment under
transport, while the remainder of sub-watersheds and MW are water flood
watersheds. But incidence of debris flows or fluvial sediment transport obviously
depends on availability of debris and yet low ruggedness of landscape indicates the
availability of loci suitable to trap debris from upstream areas and out of tributaries
dominated by debris flow, causing a transition from debris flows to bed load
transport (Marchi and Fontana 2005).
Hydrological implications
The stream network development in MW is asymmetric in that eight tributaries
originate from the left bank while only six rise from the right bank of the watershed,
creating a hydrologic disparity within the watershed. So, it can be assumed that
watershed geometry and drainage properties influenced the hydrologic regime in the
Downloaded By: [Thomas, Jobin] At: 16:06 17 May 2010
same magnitude within and among the sub-watersheds. Though many approaches
have been adopted for watershed development and management by providing
attention toward physical hydrology; parametric methods, including deciphering of
relationships among morphometric parameters and their control on hydrologic
variables earned very little consideration. The hydrological system is very complex
and morphometric analysis provides adequate information on the hydrological
behavior of the drainage watershed. An understanding of how the watershed
responds to different natural processes is one component of the essential knowledge
base for applying principles of watershed management. But this knowledge needs to
be applied in the context of how morphometrical parameters will also affect the
stream flow, sediment transport, and debris flows.
Summary
The evaluation of drainage characteristics of MW and its fourth order
sub-watersheds unveiled the importance of morphometric studies in terrain
characterization and basin evolution studies, which led to the following points.
The drainage network of the MW is well-developed and systematically organized
to provide sufficient draining, with a large number of first and second order streams.
The results emphasize the fact that the terrain, underlying the Muthirapuzha, the
chief drainage system of Munnar Plateau, is a tectonically active and uplifted
landmass exercising structural control on the drainage pattern. The results of
Horton analysis ratify Horton’s laws. The MW confirms the drainage network
development through homogeneous weathering and head-ward erosion. The Rb
values of MW characterize highly dissected mountainous watersheds with mature
topography and higher drainage integration. A high proportion of first order streams
(70%) indicates structural breaks, chiefly as, lineaments, fractures, and antiforms
and synforms, of rocky basement of the watershed. The Dd values provide sufficient
insight into surface geology (i.e. impervious basement and steeper slopes) causing
International Journal of Digital Earth 153
higher surface run off, and humid climate resulting in a moderate to well-drained
basin and a higher level or degree of dissection. The relief parameters indicate that
MW is structurally complex with mountain landscape and how the latter influences
development of stream segments. Again, it is inferred that the drainage pattern in the
watershed is controlled by relief and structure.
MW and its sub-watersheds are elongate in shape and hence the sub-units will
tend to have lower flood peaks but longer duration flood flows hence affording
flood management. These shape parameters may aid in the flow forecasting of
streams in the basin, where data are lacking or the watersheds are inaccessible. The
spatial variations in the distribution of tributary channels of Muthirapuzha, is
indicative of the role of the drainage network in determining the hydrological regime.
The higher bifurcation ratios, along with higher drainage density and low elongation
ratios and form factors suggest the geological control of later (neo) tectonic activities
on drainage organization. The watershed ‘enjoys’ sheet, rill and gully erosion, and as
a consequence a large volume of sediment is under transport. The extensive
monoculture plantations of tea and secondary eucalyptus, maintained in the
watershed may severely augment the impact. Though the hydrological system is
Downloaded By: [Thomas, Jobin] At: 16:06 17 May 2010
Acknowledgements
I (JT) am indebted to late Dr. R. Satheesh (Reader, School of Environmental Sciences,
Mahatma Gandhi University, Kerala) for strongly motivating me in high altitude mountain
research, Dr. Rajesh Raghunath (Department of Geology, University of Kerala), Mr. George
Abe (CWRDM, Kottayam) for help rendered at various stages of this study, and Dr. A.P.
Thomas (Director) and Mr. H. Vijith (Centralized Remote Sensing and GIS facility, School of
Environmental Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kerala), for rendering immense
assistance during data analysis. Finally, we are grateful to Kerala Forest Department (for
permission and logistic support in the field studies) and Kerala State Council for Science,
Technology, and Environment (KSCSTE), Thiruvananthapuram (financial support).
Notes on contributors
Jobin Thomas is currently doing his Ph.D. as a Junior Research Fellow in the Department of
Environmental Sciences, University of Kerala. He was awarded the M.Sc. in Environmental
Sciences from Mahatma Gandhi University, Kerala. The broad goal of his contemporary
research is to understand the influence of various environmental variables on river channel
morphology. His broad research interests range from river channel morphology to applica-
tions of remote sensing and GIS.
Dr. Sabu Joseph is currently working as Senior Lecturer in the Department of Environmental
Sciences, University of Kerala. He acquired his M.Sc. in Geology and Ph.D. in Sedimentology
from University of Kerala. His current research addresses the process geomorphology of
154 J. Thomas et al.
fluvial systems and his lab projects range from hydrogeochemical analysis of river systems to
isotopic applications in environmental studies.
Prof. Thrivikramji is presently working as the Project Director, Climate Change & Energy,
Centre for Environment and Development, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. He took his
M.S. in Geology (Computer applications in stratigraphic analysis) and Ph.D. in Sedimento-
logy (Paleo-hydraulics) from Syracuse University, New York. His research programs center on
the study of river metamorphosis due to human interventions and paleoclimatic significance of
sediments.
References
Anonymous, 2006. Major soil map of Idukki district, Kerala, India. Geomatics division, Soil
Survey Department, Government of Kerala.
Chorley, R.J., 1969. Introduction to fluvial processes. Bungay, UK: Methuen & Co Ltd.
Chow, V.T., Maidment, D., and Mays, L.W., 1988. Applied hydrology. New York: McGraw
Hill.
Esper, A.M.Y., 2008. Morphometric analysis of Colanguil river basin and flash flood hazard,
San Juan, Argentina. Environmental Geology, 55, 107111.
Downloaded By: [Thomas, Jobin] At: 16:06 17 May 2010
Frissel, C.A., et al., 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification-viewing
streams in a watershed context. Environment Management, 10, 199214.
Gardiner, V., 1978. Redundancy and spatial organization of drainage basin form indices.
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series, 3, 416431.
Ghosh, D.K. and Chhibber, I.B., 1984. Aid of photo interpretation in the identification of
geomorphic and geologic features around Chamba-Dharmasala area, Himachal Pradesh.
Journal of the Indian Society of Photo-Interpretation and Remote Sensing, 12 (1), 5564.
Giusti, E.V. and Schneider, W.J., 1965. The distribution of branches in river networks. USGS
professional paper, 422 G, US Geological Survey.
Gregory, K.J., 1978. Fluvial processes in British basins. In: C. Embleton, D. Brunsden, and
D.K.C. Jones, eds. Geomorphology present problems and future prospects. New York:
Oxford University Press, 4072.
Gregory, K.J. and Walling, D.E., 1973. Drainage basin form and process a geomorphological
approach. London: Edward Arnold.
Hack, J.T., 1957. Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland. USGS
professional paper, 294 B, US Geological Survey.
Hadley, R.F. and Schumm, S.A., 1961. Sediment sources and drainage basin characteristics in
upper Cheyenne River basin. USGS water supply paper, 1531-B, US Geological Survey.
Hooker, J.D., 1907. Sketch of flora of British India. Imperial gazetteer of India, 3 (1&4),
157212.
Horton, R.E., 1932. Drainage basin characteristics. Transactions of American Geophysics
Union, 13, 350361.
Horton, R.E., 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins
hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin,
56 (3), 275370.
James, E.J. and Padmini, V., 1983. Quantitative geomorphologic studies of the Kuttiyadi River
Basin on the Malabar Coast. Journal of the Institution of Engineers, 63, 266271.
Langbein, W.B., 1947. Topographic characteristics of drainage basins. USGS water supply
paper, 986 C, US Geological Survey, 125157.
Lotspeich, F.B. and Platts, W.S., 1982. An integrated land-aquatic classification system. North
American Journal of Fisheries Management, 2, 138149.
Manu, M.S. and Anirudhan, S., 2008. Drainage characteristics of Achankovil River Basin,
Kerala. Journal of Geological Society of India, 71, 841850.
Marchi, L. and Fontana, G.D., 2005. GIS morphometric indicators for the analysis of
sediment dynamics in mountain basins. Environmental Geology, 48, 218228.
Marchi, L., Pasuto, A., and Tecca, P.R., 1993. Flow processes on alluvial fans in the Eastern
Italian Alps. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie, 37, 447458.
International Journal of Digital Earth 155
Mather, P. and Doornkamp, J.C., 1970. Multivariate analysis in geography with particular
reference to drainage basin morphometry. Transactions of the Institute of British
Geographers, 51, 163187.
Maya, K., 1997. Morphometric and geomorphic aspects of Chalakkudy River Basin. Technical
Report 97-1. Thiruvananthapuram, India: Centre for Earth Science Studies.
Mekel, J.F.M., 1970. The use of aerial photographs in geological mapping. ITC text book of
photo-interpretations, 8, 1169.
Melton, M.A., 1965. The geomorphic and paleoclimatic significance of alluvial deposits in
Southern Arizona. Journal of Geology, 73, 138.
Mesa, L.M., 2006. Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucuman,
Argentina). Environmental Geology, 50, 12351242.
Miller, V.C., 1953. A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the
Clinch mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee. Technical report 3. Columbia University, New
York: Office of Naval Research, Department of Geology.
Nag, S.K., 1998. Morphometric analysis using remote sensing techniques in the Chaka sub-
watershed, Purulia district, West Bengal. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 26
(1&2), 6976.
Nag, S.K. and Chakraborty, S., 2003. Influence of rock types and structures in the
development of drainage network in hard rock area. Journal of the Indian Society of
Downloaded By: [Thomas, Jobin] At: 16:06 17 May 2010
Vittala, S.S., Govindaiah, S., and Gowda, H.H., 2004. Morphometric analysis of the
sub-watersheds in the Pavagada area of Tumkur district, South India using remote sensing
and GIS techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 32 (4), 351361.
Wilford, D.J., et al., 2004. Recognition of debris flow, debris flood and flood hazard through
watershed morphometrics. Landslides, 1, 6166.
WWF, 1997. Natural resources of Kerala. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India: World Wide
Fund for Nature.
Downloaded By: [Thomas, Jobin] At: 16:06 17 May 2010